POPULARITY
Categories
Why Did It Take So Long to Arrest An SC Lawmaker Charged With Distributing Videos of Men Raping Babies? Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell are accustomed to being disgusted by politicians who happily take part in the Good Ole Boy system when it comes to protecting bad actors from taking accountability. But this latest case has them screaming with anger. Last month, South Carolina state Rep. Robert John “RJ” May III was arrested and charged with 10 federal counts of distributing child sex abuse materials. So why is it taking so long for RJ May to be removed from office? Why was there so much hesitation and delay before arresting him? And why was his case given to two agencies that had very personal ties to him? Mandy and Liz explore the answers to those questions, as well as the biggest question of all: Why aren't men accused of perpetuating such vile and heinous abuse of children — including babies — not seen as immediate potential threats to society? Plus, (24:30) Part Two of our real-time coverage of the Scott Spivey shooting (AKA the Horry County Police Department corruption case) about Weldon Boyd's star witness, Witness No. 1. Mandy and Liz continue connecting the dots and digging into the inconsistencies in witness testimony and have found themselves at a complete loss for why the South Carolina Attorney General's Office continues to refuse to appoint a special prosecutor to the state's biggest “Stand Your Ground” case. Let's dive in!
On today's show Torres talks a BUSY couple days in the world of college sports. We have reports that NCAA Tournament expansion could be coming - and Torres tells you why he HATES it! From there, he talks about John Calipari's Wednesday media availability and a quiet confidence coming out of Arkansas. Plus, Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark gets BOLD and did you see what new UCF coach Scott Frost said about his former school - Nebraska?! Is NCAA Tournament expansion coming (2:00): Torres opens the show by discussing a report that NCAA Tournament expansion COULD be coming - and explains why it'd be a TERRIBLE idea! John Calipari discusses his 2026 squad - and are we all underrating the Hogs (22:00): Next, John Calipari held a mid-summer press conference to discuss his 2025-2026 squad - and based on what Coach Cal said, are we all underrating the Hogs? The Big 12 commish makes a BOLD statement (37:00): From there, Torres discusses a BOLD statement from Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark. What did he said? And is Yormark correct?! Finally, Torres talks Scott Frost's return to UCF - and a statement he made about his former school Nebraska. Did Frost CROSS A LINE discussing his alma mater (49:00) Fioboc is giving listeners of the Aaron Torres Pod 20% on their next purchase - for their FULL STORE of beautiful new clothes: Check out their entire store here Also, thank you to Caulipuffs, the healthy, yet delicious snack that is taking over your grocery isle! Visit Caulipuffs.com - and use code "TORRES" for 15 percent off your purchase! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Are you using "I statements" as a cheat sheet to dump your feelings on your partner?If you've ever tried to communicate better in your relationship using “I statements,” you might be surprised to learn they can actually backfire when used the wrong way.Having the tool of owning your feelings only works if you use it properly – otherwise, it breaks something. In this episode, I offer a psychological insight for us all to snack on and ask if we are really using the "I statement" appropriately.We will look at how to talk without triggering each other, and the difference between owning your personal feelings effectively and simply using the sh*t sandwich that can be the "I statement" to project your feelings onto others.This episode also contains the reminder that if you're not having the goal of connection and greater understanding with your partner, then no amount of "I statements" is going to get you there. Over 90% of communication is non-verbal, so your body language might be saying something completely different too!Please join me, as we explore healthy ways to get your feelings heard and your needs met.We'll unpack:How “I statements” can be misused to blame or shame your partnerThe real goal of connection behind effective communicationHow to share your feelings without triggering defensivenessWhy 90% of communication is nonverbal—and how to use that to your advantageThe subtle difference between owning your feelings and projecting them“If you're not aiming for true connection and understanding, no amount of ‘I statements' will get you there.” - Dr. Kavetha SundaramoorthyWhether you're talking to a partner, parent, or friend, these insights will help you make every tough conversation a little safer and more constructive.FREE tools:Get FREE access to my ‘Conflict Cure' mini-course, plus weekly relationship tools delivered straight to your inbox —> https://bit.ly/RelationalIQ-NewsletterNeed more customized support? Apply for a Relationship Breakthrough Call with Dr. Kavetha Sun —> https://go.oncehub.com/BreakthroughCallwithDrKavethaSun
Mark Epstein was openly scathing in response to the DOJ and FBI's declaration that Epstein died by suicide and that no evidence remains to pursue further investigation. He mocked the federal agencies' conclusions, stating he “laughed” at the characterization of the findings as definitive, calling the explanations “stupid.” He criticized FBI Director Kash Patel in particular, questioning whether Patel even has the medical background—or a basic first-aid qualification—to determine the cause of death and emphasizing that Patel wasn't present during the autopsy or at the prison at the time of Jeffrey's death.Mark also highlighted the opinions of two medical examiners present at the autopsy, Drs. Kristin Roman and Michael Baden, both of whom reportedly found the death less consistent with suicide and more indicative of possible foul play. He pointed to inconsistencies like a missing minute in the surveillance video outside Epstein's cell and multiple camera malfunctions, suggesting these anomalies point toward a coverup rather than closure. By challenging both the expertise of officials and the integrity of the investigative process, Mark Epstein signaled he believes the real story is far from over.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein's brother reveals why he refuses to believe death was suicide despite Pam Bondi claims | Daily Mail Online
Breaking news in the mining space today, specifically with the Mountain Pass operation in California, owned by MP Materials. New drill results from American Pacific, Intrepid Metals and Ero Copper. Valkea share their exploration plans. Koryx Copper approaches a financing. This episode of Mining Stock Daily is brought to you by... Revival Gold is one of the largest pure gold mine developer operating in the United States. The Company is advancing the Mercur Gold Project in Utah and mine permitting preparations and ongoing exploration at the Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project located in Idaho. Revival Gold is listed on the TSX Venture Exchange under the ticker symbol “RVG” and trades on the OTCQX Market under the ticker symbol “RVLGF”. Learn more about the company at revival-dash-gold.comVizsla Silver is focused on becoming one of the world's largest single-asset silver producers through the exploration and development of the 100% owned Panuco-Copala silver-gold district in Sinaloa, Mexico. The company consolidated this historic district in 2019 and has now completed over 325,000 meters of drilling. The company has the world's largest, undeveloped high-grade silver resource. Learn more at https://vizslasilvercorp.com/Equinox has recently completed the business combination with Calibre Mining to create an Americas-focused diversified gold producer with a portfolio of mines in five countries, anchored by two high-profile, long-life Canadian gold mines, Greenstone and Valentine. Learn more about the business and its operations at equinoxgold.com Integra is a growing precious metals producer in the Great Basin of the Western United States. Integra is focused on demonstrating profitability and operational excellence at its principal operating asset, the Florida Canyon Mine, located in Nevada. In addition, Integra is committed to advancing its flagship development-stage heap leach projects: the past producing DeLamar Project located in southwestern Idaho, and the Nevada North Project located in western Nevada. Learn more about the business and their high industry standards over at integraresources.com
Our Free Life Without Payments Workshop is on July 15th. You can sign up here: https://www.debtfreedad.com/pl/2148605132Subscribe to Simplify My Money: https://www.debtfreedad.com/newsletters/simplify-my-moneyIn this episode of the Debt-Free Dad podcast, host Amber discusses the importance of aligning your spending with your values. Amber shares a simple reflection exercise to help you analyze your bank statements, categorize your spending, and identify discrepancies between your financial habits and your true priorities. By taking small, actionable steps, you can start to redirect your money towards what genuinely matters to you, potentially giving yourself a 'pay raise' in the process. Tune in to learn how to bring your spending in sync with your values and take control of your financial future. Support the showThe Totally Awesome Debt Freedom Planner https://www.debtfreedad.com/planner Connect With Brad Website- https://www.debtfreedad.com Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/thedebtfreedad Private Facebook Group - https://www.facebook.com/groups/debtfreedad Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/debtfreedad/ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@debt_free_dad YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@bradnelson-debtfreedad2751/featured Thanks For Listening Like what you hear? Please, subscribe on the platform you listen to most: Apple Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Tune-In, Stitcher, YouTube Music, YouTube We LOVE feedback, and also helps us grow our podcast! Please leave us an honest review in Apple Podcasts, we read every single one. Is there someone that you think would benefit from the Debt Free Dad podcast? Please, share this episode with them on your favorite social network!
Mark Epstein was openly scathing in response to the DOJ and FBI's declaration that Epstein died by suicide and that no evidence remains to pursue further investigation. He mocked the federal agencies' conclusions, stating he “laughed” at the characterization of the findings as definitive, calling the explanations “stupid.” He criticized FBI Director Kash Patel in particular, questioning whether Patel even has the medical background—or a basic first-aid qualification—to determine the cause of death and emphasizing that Patel wasn't present during the autopsy or at the prison at the time of Jeffrey's death.Mark also highlighted the opinions of two medical examiners present at the autopsy, Drs. Kristin Roman and Michael Baden, both of whom reportedly found the death less consistent with suicide and more indicative of possible foul play. He pointed to inconsistencies like a missing minute in the surveillance video outside Epstein's cell and multiple camera malfunctions, suggesting these anomalies point toward a coverup rather than closure. By challenging both the expertise of officials and the integrity of the investigative process, Mark Epstein signaled he believes the real story is far from over.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein's brother reveals why he refuses to believe death was suicide despite Pam Bondi claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In today's episode, I'm joined by my new friend Katy Bone, a wife and mother whose story is marked by both profound loss and enduring hope. In this first part of our conversation, Katy shares the early chapters of her motherhood journey—beginning with the heartbreaking miscarriage of her first son, whom she affectionately nicknamed “Little Bit.” She speaks about the grief that followed, the anxiety of pregnancy after loss, and the joy of welcoming her daughter Poppy.Katy then invites us into the story of her son Barrett. From a concerning 20-week ultrasound to a complicated delivery and three challenging weeks in the NICU, Katy and her husband walked through a season of emotional whiplash—clinging to hope, praying for healing, and ultimately facing Barrett's homegoing.Through it all, Katy's faith shines. She shares how the love of family, the compassion of medical staff, and the promises of Scripture sustained her through the hardest days of her life. This episode is a powerful testament to the strength of a mother's love and the unwavering presence of God in the midst of suffering.Topics Covered:Miscarriage and pregnancy after lossChoosing Barrett's nameComplications during pregnancy and deliveryLife in the NICU and the emotional toll of uncertaintyBarrett's diagnosis and their final days togetherMaking precious memories in the midst of griefThe nearness of God in deep sorrowScriptures Mentioned:John 11:35 – “Jesus wept.”Psalm 34:18 – “The Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in spirit.”Connect with Katy:
ill communication: copywriting tips & sales strategies for small businesses
If you tuned in to last week's episode, you know we discussed the importance of being bold and clear in your messaging and marketing. Right now, one of the biggest trends is having a clear point of view. Nothing helps you stand out more in your marketing than knowing how to articulate what you do and whom you help in a clear and compelling way. Some call this the elevator pitch, some call it a power statement, but I like to call it a BFD or Big Frigging Deal statement. If you want to attract your ideal buyers in the remainder of the year, you need to be bold and compelling with your BFD statement. Listen in for the full details on how to create yours. Resources Mentioned:Listen to the episode all about writing your bio: https://www.kimkiel.com/podcast-1/how-to-write-your-bio-with-the-5-sentence-formula Text me a question or comment!
Composed by a group of Black feminist lesbian socialists in Boston, the Combahee River Collective Statement is credited with first using the term, identity politics. It's a good one. We manage to shoehorn a mention or two of Gloria Steinem and the CIA. Thea joins us.
Big O talks Drew Rosenhaus 070725
Episode 289: Recorded on Lori's birthday, Lori and Vonda are joined by the one and only Marlin Hargrove—freelance designer, industry educator, and master storyteller. What begins with bus-ride memories from a trip to Holland quickly unfolds into a deeply moving and wildly entertaining conversation. Marlin opens up about his 44-year journey through every corner of the floral industry—from shop floors and wholesale warehouses to addiction, recovery, and finding his place again through laughter, connection, and courage. His story is filled with grace, wisdom, and humor as he shares what it truly means to live authentically, shine in your own lane, and “make a statement or stay in the house.” This is an episode that will make you laugh, reflect, and maybe even raise your hand. Sponsored by: Flower CliqueFlower Clique Prep SchoolReal Life Retail Florist
- The Houston Astros traveled to Hollywood and swept the Los Angeles Dodgers for the first time in Dodger Stadium since 2008.- Statement series win!- Recap LAD series- Astros handed the Dodgers largest defeat in franchise history at Dodger Stadium- Astros scored 18 runs in the series opener- Jose Altuve had an incredible series, including a multi-homer game- Christian Walker makes history at Dodger Stadium- Victor Caratini cashes in his second Grand Slam this road trip- Lance McCullers Jr. continues to thrive against the Dodgers- Framber Valdez pitches six innings, while Ryan Gusto pitches his best outing so far in his career- Team win- Jeremy Pena, Hunter Brown, and Josh Hader are headed to the Midsummer Classic- Which Astros players were snubs?- CLE Preview- Astros injury updates- Reinforcements are coming- Much, much, more!YouTube link: https://youtube.com/live/GoH-bAJ0bWwHave you subscribed to the Full Seam Ahead YouTube Channel yet? Make sure to hit that subscribe button and hit that notification bell to stay up to date on all the latest Astros news, rumors, interviews, live streams, and much more all year long!
Off the holiday weekend, Luke Mauro, Criss Partee, and Figgy Fig (in for Reggie and Lopez) react to the Astros whooping the Dodgers — was that a statement series, and are the Astros officially the best team in baseball right now? Meanwhile, the Rockets made a big move by trading Cam Whitmore — will his presence be missed, or was it the right call? QOTD: What's something that isn't a sport, but you treat like one? From arguing over TV shows to grocery store strategies, the crew and listeners get competitive.
Download the notes here:https://esm.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Congregational-Notes-07.05.25.pdf____________________________________Website: esm.usPastor Mark BiltzMission Statement: (https://esm.us/about/)El Shaddai Ministries exists to take Torah to the nations by restoring the Biblical and historical perspectives that have been lost over the last 2000 years, uncovering replacement theology, and healing our Christian-Jewish relationships.Statement of Beliefs:https://tinyurl.com/4ks6eznu
Today, Calvin of Answers in Genesis Canada bemoans the fact that humanism is compatible with a secular education.Original Video: https://tinyurl.com/2cz8xdswSources:Rohingya genocide: https://tinyurl.com/uwlj7r6We Are Losing Our Children: https://tinyurl.com/28mq5765Are Young People Really Leaving Christianity?: https://tinyurl.com/uvllo4bChurch Dropouts: How Many Leave Church between ages 18-22 and Why?: https://tinyurl.com/2cqag23aChurch Dropouts Have Risen to 64%—But What About Those Who Stay?: https://tinyurl.com/wjkb3m3The Hobby Lobby Case: Contraception and Religious Freedom: https://tinyurl.com/25ag7n2gHumanist Manifesto I: https://tinyurl.com/zhsr463Humanist Manifesto II: https://tinyurl.com/y6nnffdzHumanism and Its Aspirations: Humanist Manifesto III: https://tinyurl.com/y7g96y84An introduction to evolution: https://tinyurl.com/ydghgo79National Association of Biology Teachers (2000) Statement on Teaching Evolution: https://tinyurl.com/28uw5gumA Righteous Lie: https://tinyurl.com/22zdfm27Is Lying Justified?: https://tinyurl.com/2a8f3qnqMartyn Iles Departs Answers in Genesis to Launch New Ministry Venture: https://tinyurl.com/2bqhqwt2ICE Allegedly Using Children As Bait To Deport Their Parents: https://tinyurl.com/23lhb5bbTrump authorizes additional 2,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles, US officials say: https://tinyurl.com/245v9q5vProject 2025 Tracker: https://www.project2025.observer/John J. Dunphy: https://tinyurl.com/24jx4839Humanism, a new religion: https://tinyurl.com/26y6zfwyClassroom Crusades: The Danger of Christian Nationalism in Public Schools: https://tinyurl.com/25dvmxnhExpanding Educational Freedom and Opportunity for Families: https://tinyurl.com/2yp4lxavIt's Torture Not Therapy: A Global Overview of Conversion Therapy: https://tinyurl.com/2l24tdc5All my various links can be found here:http://links.vicedrhino.comThis content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.orgBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/viced-rhino-the-podcast--4623273/support.
Get the latest entertainment news & gossip from Smallzy's The Hot Minute. For more listen live on the Nova Player & follow Smallzy on Instagram, TikTok & Facebook.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this Geek Freaks Headlines episode, we break down the sweeping layoffs hitting Microsoft's gaming division. Host Frank Lourence dives into the cancellation of major titles like Everwild and the Perfect Dark reboot, the studios impacted (including Bethesda's London office), and why King and Blizzard are taking heavy hits. We also take a moment to reflect on how repeated layoffs are reshaping the industry, with 9,100 employees affected in this latest round. All info sourced from Polygon, IGN, and internal memos.Timestamps and Topics:00:00 Microsoft lays off 9,100 employees, 4% of its workforce00:10 King reportedly hit hardest by the cuts00:18 Statement from Phil Spencer and industry-wide challenges00:23 Rare cancels Everwild, Perfect Dark reboot scrapped00:30 Bethesda London and Blizzard impacted00:36 Warcraft Rumble deprioritized00:41 A pattern of layoffs: January 2024, September 2024, May 202500:51 Closing thoughts and what's nextKey Takeaways:Microsoft has laid off 9,100 employees, with many from Xbox Game Studios.King, Rare, Blizzard, and Bethesda were among the hardest hit.Everwild and the Perfect Dark reboot have been cancelled.Warcraft Rumble is being shelved.This is one of several large rounds of layoffs Microsoft has done since early 2024.The gaming industry is in a precarious state, with restructuring happening across major publishers.Quotes:“Rare had to cancel their upcoming Everwild game. The Perfect Dark reboot is scrapped. That whole studio gone now.”“Blizzard... they're going to be putting Warcraft Rumble on the backburner.”“We're seeing these layoffs, and it's hard times hitting across the entire gaming sector.”Call to Action:If you want to stay updated on major gaming industry changes like this one, make sure to subscribe to Geek Freaks Headlines. Leave us a review, share the episode, and join the conversation using #GeekFreaksPodcast.Links and Resources:News Source: https://geekfreakspodcast.comFollow Us:
Here are all the segments: Marcus reveals his top moment from his high school football days Big Ben on Mahomes JD on Trey Hendrickson Potential CB trade? Omenihu is ready to rock Use promo code CHIEFCONCERNS to claim your Free Pick + First Time Deposit offer up to $1,000 in bonus cash! https://play.underdogfantasy.com/p-chief-concerns NEW CHIEF CONCERNS Jason Dunn Jersey – https://www.chief-concerns.com/merch/p/otro-quest-t-shirt-6ga92 USE LINK BELOW & PROMO CODE SODALOVE FOR 15% OFF OLIPOP ORDER https://tinyurl.com/OliPopChiefs Track Your Bets & Get Free Money NOW – Promo Code: Chiefs https://links.pikkit.com/user/chiefconcerns
July 3rd, 2025 MADISON -- First up, be greeted by WLRN's founder, Thistle Pettersen before she hands the baton to WLRN's newest member, Ms. Cat Bradfield, who delivers the world news segment. After enjoying Tracy Chapman's song "The Promise", hear Arianne of LGB Alliance USA speak with Thistle about Pride 2025 just before Arianne hopped into the woods for a RadFem summer camp in the Pacific Northwest this June and July. Then, hear a rendition of aurora linnea's first piece she turned in to WLRN in 2021 that April Neault loved so much, she made into this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiJGYYpXhWo After the reading of aurora's essay entitled "Pride: Corporate Patriarchy's Celebration in the Streets", we end our show by thanking our guest, Arianne of LGB Alliance USA, and signing off. This month's artwork is by WLRN's graphic designer and artist, Margaret Moss. Edition 111 Artist's Statement : "I started the featured image with an oil sketch Berthe Morisot created in 1885. The drawing/painting she made is a self-portrait that includes a portrait of her daughter. All loosely rendered. I kept the background of Berthe Morisot's oil sketch, and I digitally sketched an image of our guest Arianne of LGB Alliance USA, and Tracy Chapman, whose song, ‘The Promise' is included in this month's podcast. I included purple and green because I especially like those colors - and I appreciate that they have a connection to (British) suffragists. I enjoyed interacting with Berthe Morisot's artwork. Even though she created her painting in 1885, it has a modern feel. I expect that Morisot had a greater influence on Modern Art than she is given credit for. I appreciate women such as Berthe Morisot, all the suffragists, Arianne, and Tracy Chapman for their contributions to our culture. And I appreciate WLRN for lifting up women so their voices can be heard more widely."
Welcome back to the second half of my conversation with Greg and Cathy Buffkin.In today's episode, the Buffkins speak directly to the grieving parent—especially the one who has lost a child to suicide and is wondering how to take the next breath, let alone the next step. With transparency and tenderness, they offer hard-won wisdom from their own journey, sharing what sustained them through the darkest days and how God's presence, along with the support of others, helped carry them forward.They share honestly about the emotional weight of guilt, the unique struggles of grieving as a couple, and the often-overlooked pain of surviving siblings. They also introduce us to their beautiful ministry, The Empty Chair Endeavor, and the purpose it's brought in the wake of devastating loss.This episode is filled with insight, encouragement, and a message of enduring hope for anyone navigating the deep waters of grief.Click HERE to listen to the first half of my conversation with the Buffkins.Click HERE to listen to the Empty Chair Endeavor podcast with Greg Buffkin. Click HERE to visit the Empty Chair Endeavor website, and HERE to follow their Facebook page. I would love to hear your thoughts on the show. Click here to send me a message! (Though I read every message, I am unable to respond through this format.) ** IMPORTANT** - All views expressed by guests on this podcast are theirs alone, and may not represent the Statement of Faith and Statement of Beliefs of the While We're Waiting ministry. We'd love for you to connect with us here at While We're Waiting! Click HERE to visit our website and learn about our free While We're Waiting Weekends for bereaved parentsClick HERE to learn more about our network of While We're Waiting support groups all across the country. Click HERE to subscribe to our YouTube channelClick HERE to follow our public Facebook pageClick HERE to follow us on Instagram Click HERE to follow us on Twitter Click HERE to make a tax-deductible donation to the While We're Waiting ministryContact Jill by email at: jill@whilewerewaiting.org
Hour 3: Nic Barlage on WNBA in Cleveland + Haslams statement on Brook Park + How many Browns will make it to Brook Park? full 2269 Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:21:29 +0000 7i3Rv7ZnZHOYqcPPoKzHJ0FtHEg0PuoJ sports The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima sports Hour 3: Nic Barlage on WNBA in Cleveland + Haslams statement on Brook Park + How many Browns will make it to Brook Park? The only place to talk about the Cleveland sports scene is with Ken Carman and Anthony Lima. The two guide listeners through the ups and downs of being a fan of the Browns, Cavaliers, Guardians and Ohio State Buckeyes in Northeast Ohio. They'll help you stay informed with breaking news, game coverage, and interviews with top personalities.Catch The Ken Carman Show with Anthony Lima live Monday through Friday (6 a.m. - 10 a.m ET) on 92.3 The Fan, the exclusive audio home of the Browns, or on the Audacy app. For more, follow the show on X @KenCarmanShow. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False
Ken Carman and Anthony Lima discuss WNBA expansion, react to a statement from Jimmy and Dee Haslam over the Browns' new dome, and talk about why Ty Jerome is the most interesting player the Cavs had in a long time.
In this episode Garth interviews Dan Ariely from Duke University in Durham, NC. Dan shares insights on motivation, fairness in the workplace, and the importance of subjective measures in understanding human interactions. He elaborates on his work during the COVID-19 pandemic and the challenges he faced, including receiving death threats. He emphasizes the role of empathy and understanding in dealing with misbeliefs and polarizing behavior. He also discusses the importance of gratitude, making the invisible visible, and creating more conducive environments for human motivation. The episode concludes with Dan's reflections on the importance of social science in addressing current global challenges. [Note. Portions of the show notes were generated by Descript AI.] Statement from Duke University April 2 2024 About the investigation of my work Dear friends, partners, and colleagues: After almost three years, Duke University recently concluded its investigation into my conduct as an academic and researcher. The Investigation Committee assembled by Duke's administration looked thoroughly at my work and found no evidence to support claims that I falsified data or knowingly used falsified data in general and specifically as coauthor of a 2012 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The Investigation Committee determined that I should have done more to prevent faulty data from being published in the 2012 paper. Hindsight is 20/20, and upon much reflection, indeed there were extra steps I could have taken to prevent such data from being published. I appreciate the opportunity to learn from this experience, and I would like to reaffirm my commitment to ensuring that my research methodologies at the Center for Advanced Hindsight remain in lockstep with values of integrity, transparency, and accuracy. I am happy to say I've put this matter behind me and resumed my work at Duke at full speed. To my dear friends and colleagues: Thank you for your continued support. With all my love and enthusiasm for what lies ahead, Dan Replications of the 2012 study in question: "How Pledges Reduce Dishonesty: The Role of Involvement and Identification" Paper: https://tinyurl.com/ycpumrtk Video discussion with some of the co-authors of the paper https://youtu.be/B_AbAJHRw54 "I Solemnly Swear I'm Up To Good: A Megastudy Investigating the Effectiveness of Honesty Oaths on Curbing Dishonesty": Paper: https://tinyurl.com/53mbn5ws Video discussion with a co-author of the paper: https://youtu.be/AjQ58irCZGg
Ever feel like a failure after a project doesn't go as planned? Discover how Maurice reframes failure as a valuable feedback mechanism, turning setbacks into stepping stones for growth.Chapter Summary:00:00 Redefining Failure01:20 The Importance of Branding03:54 Embracing Feedback as Growth06:10 Lessons from Mistakes08:19 Winners and MistakesFeatured Quotes:“Branding is about what others say you are.” - Maurice“Treat failure like it's the feedback loop.” - Maurice“Winners don't avoid mistakes… They analyze the situation, and then they adjust appropriately.” - MauriceBehind the Story:Maurice shares how viewing failures as feedback can help businesses and individuals refine their approach and build a stronger brand. The episode dives into real-world examples, from sports to entrepreneurship, to illustrate the power of adapting and adjusting strategies based on perceived missteps.Resources:Well Why Not Workbook: https://bit.ly/authormauricechismPodmatch: https://bit.ly/joinpodmatchwithmauriceConnect With:Maurice Chism: https://bit.ly/CoachMauriceWebsite: https://bit.ly/mauricechismPatreon: https://bit.ly/CoachMauriceonPatreonTo be a guest: https://bit.ly/beaguestonthatwillnevrworkpodcastBusiness Email: mchism@chismgroup.netBusiness Address: PO Box 460, Secane, PA 19018Subscribe to That Will Nevr Work Podcast:Spreaker: https://bit.ly/TWNWSpreakerSupport the channelPurchase our apparel: https://bit.ly/ThatWillNevrWorkPodcastapparel
Commentary by Dr. Jian'an Wang.
On this week's episode of Days of Roar, Evan Petzold flies solo — sharing an update about the show and his personal life. We break down Tarik Skubal's dominant Sunday Night Baseball performance, reminding everyone that he is the best pitcher in the world. We also make the case for — and against — a contract extension for Gleyber Torres, who is set to become a free agent after the 2025 season.Chris Castellani of Chris and Company joins the show to talk about the Tigers' success as the best team in the American League, what he wants president of baseball operations Scott Harris to do at the July 31 trade deadline, and what it's like being a fan (and a content creator) of a World Series-caliber team.We also discuss the journey of Dietrich Enns, the Matt Vierling and Trey Sweeney roster moves, the plan for Reese Olson's return from injury and the potential All-Star Game starters for the Tigers. Follow Evan on X/Twitter here. Read Evan's most recent work here
Statement of Joel and Kat reviewing The Magnus Archives, a horror/mystery podcast from the Rusty Quill, recorded direct from subjects Statement begins Well friends, we completed the first season of The Magnus Archives and we have a lot to discuss! From attacks by bugs, a werewolf man, creepy clown dolls and more! We also get new mysteries to ponder as we head deeper into the labyrinth of mysteries. Supplemental: We have decided to record more episodes detailing our continuing listen-through of this podcast. We'll report back once we know more 4:03 Succinct Summaries 8:55 Overall Plot Synopsis 30:27 Scariest episodes 35:52 Favorite Episodes 41:10 Free Fall 44:01 Lost and Found 50:01 Werewolf 55:21 The Killing Floor 59:21 Cheating Death 1:04:52 Strange Music 1:08:56 A Sturdy Lock 1:10:11 Properties of the Horrors 1:11:51 Random Thoughts 1:32:38 Miscellaneous Questions 1:40:18 NotSasha 1:46:19 The Traitor 1:50:16 Conspiracy Theories 1:51:31 Predictions for Season 2 1:54:11 Joel writes Poetry and song 1:55:52 Ode to the Horrors (Joel writes Songs) 1:57:55 Man versus Horrors (Joel writes Poetry) 1:59:27 Season 1 Q&A 2:02:37 Gertrude Robinson's Death 2:07:06 Research Notes from fans
In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress
Download the notes here:https://tinyurl.com/062825notes______________________________________________Torah Portion:פָּרָּ שַׁ ת קֹרַׁ חKorach“Korah”I”Numbers 16:1-18:321 Samuel 11:14-12:22John 19:1-17Website: esm.usPastor Mark BiltzMission Statement: (https://esm.us/about/)El Shaddai Ministries exists to take Torah to the nations by restoring the Biblical and historical perspectives that have been lost over the last 2000 years, uncovering replacement theology, and healing our Christian-Jewish relationships.Statement of Beliefs:https://tinyurl.com/4ks6eznuCCLI License #1931787stream license #CSPL051670we have the rights to play/stream all music in this service.Website: esm.usPastor Mark BiltzMission Statement: (https://esm.us/about/)El Shaddai Ministries exists to take Torah to the nations by restoring the Biblical and historical perspectives that have been lost over the last 2000 years, uncovering replacement theology, and healing our Christian-Jewish relationships.Statement of Beliefs:https://tinyurl.com/4ks6eznuDownload the notes here:https://tinyurl.com/062125notes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Torah Portion:Shelach“Send”I”Numbers 13-15Joshua 2:1-24Matthew 10:1-14Deuteronomy 1:24 And they turned and went up into themountain, and came unto the valley of Eshcol, and searched(ragal) it out.Genesis 48:19 And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son,I know it: He also shall become a people, and he also shall be great:But truly his younger brother shall be greater than he.Romans 10:14,15 How then shall they call on him in whom theyhave not believed? And how shall they believe in him of whomthey have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?And how shall they preach, except they be sent? As it is written,How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace,and bring glad tidings of good things!CCLI License #1931787stream license #CSPL051670we have the rights to play/stream all music in this service.
In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On episode 197 of The Compound and Friends, Michael Batnick and Downtown Josh Brown are joined by Cole Wilcox, Founder, CEO and CIO of Longboard Asset Management to discuss: all things trend following, using systems to overcome emotion, technical analysis, Nvidia, the new generation of investors, and much more! This episode is sponsored by Public. Find out more at: https://public.com/compound Sign up for The Compound Newsletter and never miss out: thecompoundnews.com/subscribe Instagram: instagram.com/thecompoundnews Twitter: twitter.com/thecompoundnews LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/the-compound-media/ TikTok: tiktok.com/@thecompoundnews Public disclosure: All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for US-listed, registered securities, options and bonds in a self-directed account are offered by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA & SIPC. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1890144), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC. *Rate as of 3/5/25. APY is variable and subject to change. **Terms and Conditions apply. Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Josh Brown are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information. Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
After lunch, Slavik resumed by delving deeper into the case of the witness known as “Jane,” outlining the four stages of her relationship with Combs—from early “love‑bombing” to repeated “hotel nights” (or “freak‑offs”) orchestrated under Combs's control via lies, threats, and the looming possibility of losing housing or having intimate recordings released. She emphasized that even a single coerced encounter—if facilitated by his enterprise—met the legal definition of sex trafficking. “You do not need to find that all of the freak‑offs… were force or coercion,” she told jurors; “if there was one time, one single freak‑off, when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that [Jane] was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence—then that's it. He's guilty”Shifting focus, Slavik then tackled the transportation-for-prostitution counts, showing how Combs and his aides paid for male escorts to travel—through flights, hotels, and bank records—to facilitate these encounters. She dismissed the notion of consensual participation, arguing that it “doesn't matter” whether the escorts consented—the crime lies in transporting them for paid sexual activity. She underscored that the enterprise facilitated this process, reinforcing the RICO charge's breadth. Shortly before the afternoon break, Slavik turned back to Cassie Ventura's situation, pointing to the strategic use of text messages and fear-based threats—recalling that Combs blackmailed her with videos and deployed violence and control tactics—to show the jury how a pattern of coercion extended across relationshipsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: @innercitypress
Slavik began by hammering home that Sean “Diddy” Combs was the unquestioned leader of a criminal enterprise—a “kingdom” built on wealth, fame, and a loyal inner circle ready to do his bidding. She painted a picture of Combs as empowered by his status and surrounded by lieutenants—assistants and security personnel—who enabled violent and criminal conduct. Addressing the racketeering conspiracy, she reminded jurors that the law views group crime as more dangerous, arguing that Combs's enterprise committed hundreds of predicate acts: from drug distribution and bribery to witness tampering and forced labor. She emphasized that Combs “doesn't take no for an answer” and “used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,” spotlighting the relationship between his authority and the alleged crimes.Slavik then pivoted to the heart of the case—the sex‑trafficking and “freak‑off” allegations. She revisited testimony from former partners Cassie Ventura and Jane, underlining how they were allegedly drugged and coerced into participating in orgies with escorts, all orchestrated by Combs. She stressed that “drugs were an essential ingredient” in these events, part of how Combs maintained control and compliance, procuring substances through his enterprise. ith stark imagery and ferocity, she alleged that he repeatedly “forced, threatened and manipulated” victims—making it clear that this was a pattern of exploitation, not isolated incidents.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: @innercitypress
After lunch, Marc Agnifilo sharpened his focus on reframing the core allegations as nothing more than the product of consensual, if unconventional, relationships. He argued that what the government described as trafficking was in fact a mutual lifestyle choice embraced by Combs and his partners, particularly Cassie Ventura and “Jane.” He portrayed the so-called “freak-offs” not as coercive events, but as expressions of intimacy, repeating that “this is how they're close.” He told jurors that Cassie willingly participated, highlighting video stills of her appearing relaxed and smiling in a hotel suite. His argument hinged on the notion that proximity, emotional connection, and shared sexual experiences were being weaponized into crimes by prosecutors bent on sensationalism.Agnifilo then turned to dismantling the narrative around the more violent or incendiary allegations. He admitted Combs had a temper and was at times abusive but insisted that this did not constitute racketeering or sex trafficking. He called the accusation that Combs burned Kid Cudi's car “nonsense,” dismissing it as an exaggerated lover's spat. He also attacked the claim that Combs attempted to bribe his employees to delete security footage, arguing that his behavior reflected paranoia, not criminal intent. Addressing the testimony of “Mia,” he downplayed her account by pointing to photos of her smiling alongside Combs and others, insinuating that her story lacked the gravity and consistency of a real trafficking survivor. His overarching theme was that the prosecution had cherry-picked moments of dysfunction and exaggerated them into a federal case.He left the jury with one final statement:"America is great because between each citizen and the government there is a jury. This is your house. I am asking you to summon that courage to to do the right thing and acquit Sean Combs on all counts. He is not a racketeer. He is innocent. Let him go home to his family."to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress
Marc Agnifilo opened the defense's closing argument by sharply criticizing the government's characterization of Combs's private life as criminal. He jeered at the federal agents for seizing large quantities of Astroglyde and baby oil, sarcastically applauding, “Way to go, fellas,” and insisted that the case had been “badly exaggerated”. Agnifilo argued that what the prosecution portrayed as a racketeering enterprise was nothing more than consensual behavior—a swingers' lifestyle with drug use—and proclaimed that Combs “did not do racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking."Before the morning break, Agnifilo portrayed Combs not as a felon but as “a self‑made, successful Black entrepreneur,” emphasizing that the relationships at issue were voluntary, if “toxic,” rather than coerced. He reframed the case as one driven by financial motives, asserting that the accusers, particularly Cassie Ventura, pursued the criminal lawsuit for money—highlighting her multi‑million‑dollar settlement—as opposed to genuine grievances.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress
Right after the lunch recess, Slavik resumed by focusing on Combs's relationship with “Jane,” the pseudonymous ex-girlfriend. She recapped how Combs escalated from “love‑bombing” with gifts and trips to coercive “hotel-night” sessions, leveraging his control over Jane's living situation and finances. She emphasized that even a single coerced “freak-off” session is enough for a sex-trafficking conviction, reminding the jury that Jane testified: “I didn't want it to feel too real… it just made things easier,” indicating she participated out of fear and manipulation.Slavik then turned to racketeering and witness tampering, detailing how Combs and associates reached out to Jane and former assistant “Mia” after Cassie Ventura's lawsuit—playing recordings of calls where he encouraged Jane to downplay her experiences and used D‑Roc's presence to intimidate Mia, who testified she felt “terrified”Christy Slavik concluded her nearly five-hour closing argument with a powerful, emotional plea that marked a clear turning point in her case. First, she reminded the jury that regardless of how disturbing the evidence was, it “proves to you that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Then, with quiet force, she directly appealed to the jurors: “Up until today, the defendant was able to get away with his crimes because of his money, power and influence. It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. It's time to find the defendant guilty.”By ending her summation this way, Slavik framed the jury's role sharply: Combs's fame, wealth, and the influence that once shielded him must no longer be a barrier to accountability. Her closing words repositioned the deliberation as a matter of principle—justice over privilege—and underscored the gravity of the decision now entrusted to the twelve jurors. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress
After lunch, Slavik resumed by delving deeper into the case of the witness known as “Jane,” outlining the four stages of her relationship with Combs—from early “love‑bombing” to repeated “hotel nights” (or “freak‑offs”) orchestrated under Combs's control via lies, threats, and the looming possibility of losing housing or having intimate recordings released. She emphasized that even a single coerced encounter—if facilitated by his enterprise—met the legal definition of sex trafficking. “You do not need to find that all of the freak‑offs… were force or coercion,” she told jurors; “if there was one time, one single freak‑off, when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that [Jane] was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence—then that's it. He's guilty”Shifting focus, Slavik then tackled the transportation-for-prostitution counts, showing how Combs and his aides paid for male escorts to travel—through flights, hotels, and bank records—to facilitate these encounters. She dismissed the notion of consensual participation, arguing that it “doesn't matter” whether the escorts consented—the crime lies in transporting them for paid sexual activity. She underscored that the enterprise facilitated this process, reinforcing the RICO charge's breadth. Shortly before the afternoon break, Slavik turned back to Cassie Ventura's situation, pointing to the strategic use of text messages and fear-based threats—recalling that Combs blackmailed her with videos and deployed violence and control tactics—to show the jury how a pattern of coercion extended across relationshipsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: @innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
After lunch, Marc Agnifilo sharpened his focus on reframing the core allegations as nothing more than the product of consensual, if unconventional, relationships. He argued that what the government described as trafficking was in fact a mutual lifestyle choice embraced by Combs and his partners, particularly Cassie Ventura and “Jane.” He portrayed the so-called “freak-offs” not as coercive events, but as expressions of intimacy, repeating that “this is how they're close.” He told jurors that Cassie willingly participated, highlighting video stills of her appearing relaxed and smiling in a hotel suite. His argument hinged on the notion that proximity, emotional connection, and shared sexual experiences were being weaponized into crimes by prosecutors bent on sensationalism.Agnifilo then turned to dismantling the narrative around the more violent or incendiary allegations. He admitted Combs had a temper and was at times abusive but insisted that this did not constitute racketeering or sex trafficking. He called the accusation that Combs burned Kid Cudi's car “nonsense,” dismissing it as an exaggerated lover's spat. He also attacked the claim that Combs attempted to bribe his employees to delete security footage, arguing that his behavior reflected paranoia, not criminal intent. Addressing the testimony of “Mia,” he downplayed her account by pointing to photos of her smiling alongside Combs and others, insinuating that her story lacked the gravity and consistency of a real trafficking survivor. His overarching theme was that the prosecution had cherry-picked moments of dysfunction and exaggerated them into a federal case.He left the jury with one final statement:"America is great because between each citizen and the government there is a jury. This is your house. I am asking you to summon that courage to to do the right thing and acquit Sean Combs on all counts. He is not a racketeer. He is innocent. Let him go home to his family."to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Right after the lunch recess, Slavik resumed by focusing on Combs's relationship with “Jane,” the pseudonymous ex-girlfriend. She recapped how Combs escalated from “love‑bombing” with gifts and trips to coercive “hotel-night” sessions, leveraging his control over Jane's living situation and finances. She emphasized that even a single coerced “freak-off” session is enough for a sex-trafficking conviction, reminding the jury that Jane testified: “I didn't want it to feel too real… it just made things easier,” indicating she participated out of fear and manipulation.Slavik then turned to racketeering and witness tampering, detailing how Combs and associates reached out to Jane and former assistant “Mia” after Cassie Ventura's lawsuit—playing recordings of calls where he encouraged Jane to downplay her experiences and used D‑Roc's presence to intimidate Mia, who testified she felt “terrified”Christy Slavik concluded her nearly five-hour closing argument with a powerful, emotional plea that marked a clear turning point in her case. First, she reminded the jury that regardless of how disturbing the evidence was, it “proves to you that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Then, with quiet force, she directly appealed to the jurors: “Up until today, the defendant was able to get away with his crimes because of his money, power and influence. It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. It's time to find the defendant guilty.”By ending her summation this way, Slavik framed the jury's role sharply: Combs's fame, wealth, and the influence that once shielded him must no longer be a barrier to accountability. Her closing words repositioned the deliberation as a matter of principle—justice over privilege—and underscored the gravity of the decision now entrusted to the twelve jurors. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Marc Agnifilo opened the defense's closing argument by sharply criticizing the government's characterization of Combs's private life as criminal. He jeered at the federal agents for seizing large quantities of Astroglyde and baby oil, sarcastically applauding, “Way to go, fellas,” and insisted that the case had been “badly exaggerated”. Agnifilo argued that what the prosecution portrayed as a racketeering enterprise was nothing more than consensual behavior—a swingers' lifestyle with drug use—and proclaimed that Combs “did not do racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking."Before the morning break, Agnifilo portrayed Combs not as a felon but as “a self‑made, successful Black entrepreneur,” emphasizing that the relationships at issue were voluntary, if “toxic,” rather than coerced. He reframed the case as one driven by financial motives, asserting that the accusers, particularly Cassie Ventura, pursued the criminal lawsuit for money—highlighting her multi‑million‑dollar settlement—as opposed to genuine grievances.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
The wife of Vance Boelter — the man charged in the killing of State Rep. Melissa Hortman — has released her first public statement since the shootings. More rain is expected across central and southern Minnesota today, following storms that caused flash flooding yesterday.Those stories and more in today's evening update. Hosted by Emily Reese. Music by Gary Meister.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/i7IdKgUQoDUAfter Karen Read was acquitted of the Murder charges on June 18, 2025, DA Michael Morrissey, & Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan gave statements to the media that prompted Alan Jackson counter."The jury has spoken," DA Michael Morrissey simply states.Hank Brennan expresses disappointment in the verdict and states that his independent review, along with a closed federal investigation, led him to conclude that only one person was responsible for John O'Keefe's death, and no other suspects were identified. If Brennan believed only one person was responsible, a prosecutor's job is to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, which was not achieved. He also condemns a "campaign of intimidation and abuse" against witnesses. That sentiment is agreeable but incomplete because he doesn't also condemn it also against the witness, jurors and other participates. Jackson blasts Brennan for an "egregious breach of prosecutorial ethics" by attempting to publicly shame and discredit the jury and supplant his personal views for that of the jury. Jackson argues that Brennan's claims of a thorough investigation are false, given the defense uncovered hidden exculpatory evidence, lies, and perjury by the Commonwealth's own witnesses, cops covering for other cops, a biased and corrupt lead investigator with personal ties to witnesses, and inculpatory and suspicious conduct by a myriad of witnesses. Jackson asserts that the prosecution's effort was a personal vendetta against Karen Read, not a pursuit of justice for John O'Keefe, and that the case never should have gone to trial in the first place. He directly accuses DA Michael Morrissey of having no interest in actually seeking justice for John O'Keefe.RESOURCESDA Michael Morrissey's Statement - https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/norfolk-da-michael-morrissey-gives-statement-karen-read-verdict/6N6N23YM25AQPMEXRLR6HAOTOM/Hank Brennan's Statement - https://x.com/TedDanielnews/status/1937134441505096022Alan Jackson's Statement - https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/karen-read-attorney-alan-jackson-blasts-special-prosecutor-new-statement/NY7R26CSFJETXGFLIEKHRQE6Y4/This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Greg and Cathy Buffkin join me on the podcast today to share the story of their son Ryan—a funny and tenderhearted young man who brought joy and laughter to everyone around him. As we get to know Ryan through their memories, we also learn about the hidden struggles he carried and the heartbreaking loss they experienced when he died by suicide in the fall of 2015.With honesty and grace, Greg and Cathy open up about the complicated grief that comes with suicide loss, including the misconceptions that often surround it. They speak directly to the false belief that suicide is the unforgivable sin, offering reassurance that Ryan knew the Lord and is with Him now. Our conversation is both tender and powerful, offering hope, truth, and the comforting reminder that God's love never lets go—even in our deepest sorrow.In this conversation, you'll hear:Stories of Ryan's life and personalityThe events leading up to his deathThe discovery of deeply painful truths after his passingHow Greg and Kathy have processed their grief over the past ten yearsThe impact of sibling loss on their surviving daughterGentle, faith-filled advice for parents grieving a suicideA reminder that God's love reaches even into our darkest placesThis episode is tender, honest, and full of hope. If you've lost a child—or know someone who has—Greg and Cathy's story will remind you that you are not alone and that God is present, even in the pain.Resources & Links:While We're Waiting – Support for bereaved parentsScripture References:Romans 8:1 – “There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.”Romans 8:38-39 – “Nothing in all creation will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”Romans 8:28 – “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him…”Connect with Us:Subscribe to the podcast so you never miss an episodeLeave a review to help others find hopeVisit whilewerewaiting.org to learn more about our ministry for bereaved parentsCome back next week to hear the rest of the Buffkins' storyI would love to hear your thoughts on the show. Click here to send me a message! (Though I read every message, I am unable to respond through this format.) ** IMPORTANT** - All views expressed by guests on this podcast are theirs alone, and may not represent the Statement of Faith and Statement of Beliefs of the While We're Waiting ministry. We'd love for you to connect with us here at While We're Waiting! Click HERE to visit our website and learn about our free While We're Waiting Weekends for bereaved parentsClick HERE to learn more about our network of While We're Waiting support groups all across the country. Click HERE to subscribe to our YouTube channelClick HERE to follow our public Facebook pageClick HERE to follow us on Instagram Click HERE to follow us on Twitter Click HERE to make a tax-deductible donation to the While We're Waiting ministryContact Jill by email at: jill@whilewerewaiting.org
On Episode 976 of Hittin' Season, powered by WHYY, John Stolnis of The Good Phight, Justin Klugh from Baseball Prospectus and SABR's Editor of the Baseball Research Journal, Liz Roscher, recap the Phillies' emphatic series win over the Mets this weekend. Is this now officially a two-team race in the NL East? Did the Phils make a statement with their two blowout wins? Also, John, Justin and Liz talk about which Phillies are deserving of an All Star nod.
President Donald Trump says he'll decide whether or not to attack Iran within the next two weeks. On this week's On the Media, hear why the right is split on what the president should do. Plus, scrutiny on student journalists has intensified.[01:00] Host Brooke Gladstone on the recent narratives forming around the ‘No Kings' protest and President Trump's military parade. Plus, a look at the lie that the left is more politically violent than the right – a falsehood that has emerged in rightwing narratives about ICE being victimized.[14:03] Brooke speaks with Andrew Prokop, senior politics correspondent at Vox, about the bitter divide growing within the MAGA ranks – between the “America First” faction, who advocate against war with Iran and helping Ukraine, and GOP hawks who want Trump to attack. [30:44] Host Micah Loewinger sits down with Gregorio Olivares Gutierrez, a rising junior at the University of Texas Dallas and editor-in-chief of The Retrograde, to discuss his brief tenure as editor-in-chief of his school's official paper, The Mercury. They examine how The Mercury's coverage of a pro-Palestine encampment last spring ignited a chain of events that led to the university firing him and the entire staff, and the de facto shuttering of the paper. Mike Hiestand, Senior Legal Counsel at the Student Press Law Center, on the chilling effect experienced by student journalists across the country after ICE arrested Tufts grad student Rümeysa Öztürk.Statement from Barnard College: "Barnard respects and supports a robust student press. As students present in Butler Library during the disruption have been confirmed to be working as journalists, we have notified them that their interim suspensions have been lifted. As our review continues, we will issue additional notifications as appropriate." Statement from Columbia University: “The interim suspension on the Columbia student journalist was lifted within hours after it was issued once it was determined that the individual was a member of the student press who was covering the protest as a reporter, not a participant in the disruptions to academic activities that were in violation of University policies and Rules. Columbia University continues to strongly believe in the value of a vibrant and independent student press."Statement from University of Texas Dallas: “UT Dallas has always supported student journalists' editorial control and wants to create an environment where they can learn best journalistic practices and follow professional standards and guidelines. For clarification, the former editor was not removed for editorial content, but because he violated student media bylaws. Over the past few months, a group of university faculty, students, and staff has worked together to establish a new advisory committee for student media. Its goals included reviving the campus newspaper and ensuring the staff has necessary resources to operate with the editorial independence critical for student journalists.”UT Dallas Student Media Memo: “Removal of The Mercury Editor-in-Chief” by Lydia LumGregorio Olivares Gutierrez's Appeal to the UT Dallas Student Media Memo regarding his removal Further reading:“Parsing ICE's mixed-up, hard-to-believe assault claims,” by Philip Bump“‘They're Taking Shirly': An Army Sergeant Thought His Family Was Safe. Then ICE Deported His Wife,” by Sonner Kehrt“The surprising right-wing push to keep us out of war,” by Andrew ProkopQuestion Everything with Brian Reed: “Rümeysa Öztürk is Locked Up for an Op-ed: An Urgent Summit with the Student Newspaper that Published It”The Eagle: A Times Union Podcast, “The Future of Journalism”The Mercury's May 20, 2025 Edition: “Welcome to UTD” On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org.