Global Poverty: Philosophical Questions

Follow Global Poverty: Philosophical Questions
Share on
Copy link to clipboard

These lectures are about the moral obligations that well-off people have toward poor people living in other countries. Poverty kills about one-third of humankind. Many philosophers argue that the average person in a rich country has a moral obligation to do something about this. These lectures intro…

Oxford University


    • Aug 8, 2011 LATEST EPISODE
    • infrequent NEW EPISODES
    • 52m AVG DURATION
    • 8 EPISODES


    Search for episodes from Global Poverty: Philosophical Questions with a specific topic:

    Latest episodes from Global Poverty: Philosophical Questions

    4. Arguments from Harm

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011 53:14


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses arguments that claim citizens of rich countries are responsible for harming poor people in other countries. He focuses on Thomas Pogge's influential argument for this conclusion, as well as Pogge's proposals for reforming international institutions.

    4. Arguments from Harm (Other Resource)

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses arguments that claim citizens of rich countries are responsible for harming poor people in other countries. He focuses on Thomas Pogge's influential argument for this conclusion, as well as Pogge's proposals for reforming international institutions.

    3. Arguments from Distributive Justice

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011 51:22


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses the debate over whether distributive justice requires that well-off people do something about poverty in other countries. 'Cosmopolitan' philosophers, such as Charles Beitz and Simon Caney, argue that it does. Anti-cosmopolitans, such as John Rawls and Thomas Nagel, deny this.

    3. Arguments from Distributive Justice (Other Resource)

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses the debate over whether distributive justice requires that well-off people do something about poverty in other countries. 'Cosmopolitan' philosophers, such as Charles Beitz and Simon Caney, argue that it does. Anti-cosmopolitans, such as John Rawls and Thomas Nagel, deny this.

    2. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 2

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011 52:28


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses objections to the belief that well-off people have extremely demanding obligations to poor people in other countries. The views of J. L. Mackie, Bernard Williams, Samuel Scheffler, Liam Murphy and Garrett Cullity are considered. He then considers Murphy and Cullity's arguments that well-off people have less demanding obligations to poor people in other countries.

    2. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 2 (Other Resource)

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, discusses objections to the belief that well-off people have extremely demanding obligations to poor people in other countries. The views of J. L. Mackie, Bernard Williams, Samuel Scheffler, Liam Murphy and Garrett Cullity are considered. He then considers Murphy and Cullity's arguments that well-off people have less demanding obligations to poor people in other countries.

    1. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 1

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011 52:24


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at Oxford University, introduces some of the key concepts in philosophical debates about global poverty. He then discusses Peter Singer's argument that not donating to aid agencies is as wrong as letting a drowning child die.

    1. Arguments from Beneficence, Part 1 (Other Resource)

    Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2011


    James Grant, Lecturer in Philosophy at Oxford University, introduces some of the key concepts in philosophical debates about global poverty. He then discusses Peter Singer's argument that not donating to aid agencies is as wrong as letting a drowning child die.

    Claim Global Poverty: Philosophical Questions

    In order to claim this podcast we'll send an email to with a verification link. Simply click the link and you will be able to edit tags, request a refresh, and other features to take control of your podcast page!

    Claim Cancel