Podcasts about distributive justice

What does it mean to have respect for the goods of others? Fr. Mike unpacks the Catechism's answer to this question and what it teaches about the seventh commandment in regards to respect for persons and their goods. We learn that it comes down to the dignity of persons and the virtues of temperance, justice, and solidarity. Today's readings are Catechism paragraphs 2407-2414. This episode has been found to be in conformity with the Catechism by the Institute on the Catechism, under the Subcommittee on the Catechism, USCCB. For the complete reading plan, visit ascensionpress.com/ciy Please note: The Catechism of the Catholic Church contains adult themes that may not be suitable for children - parental discretion is advised.

In Episode 152 Ben chats with Courtney Copeland, a doctoral student in counseling psychology at the University of Buffalo and an Enrolled Member of the Seneca Nation and Dr. Katy Leigh-Osroosh, an Assistant Professor in the School of Counselling, School, and Educational Psychology at the University of Buffalo.   Continuing Education Credits (https://www.cbiconsultants.com/shop) BACB: 1.5 Learning IBAO: 1.5 Cultural QABA: 1.5 DEI Check out Courtney's awesome podcast!!  https://thedsmpodcast.podbean.com/   Contact: Courtney Copeland https://www.linkedin.com/in/courtneysiricopeland/ Katy Leigh-Osroosh https://ed.buffalo.edu/about/directory/faculty/profile.html?uid=kosroosh Links Native American Concerns Group https://www.multiculturalcounselingdevelopment.org/nativeamerican The Society for Indian Psychologists https://www.nativepsychs.org/ Kim Tallbear https://kimtallbear.com/ Behaviour Speak Podcast Episodes Referenced Episode 130 Jordyn Burleson https://www.behaviourspeak.com/e/episode-130-the-tonowanda-seneca-behavior-technician-with-jordyn-burleson-rbt/ Articles Referenced  Leigh-Osroosh, K. T., & Copeland, C. (2024). Distributive Justice for Native American Indigenous Peoples within Counseling. Counseling and Values, 69(1), 21-46. https://brill.com/view/journals/cvj/69/1/article-p21_3.xml Leigh-Osroosh, Katheryne T. and Hutchison, Brian (2019) "Cultural Identity Silencing of Native Americans in Education," Race and Pedagogy Journal: Teaching and Learning for Justice: Vol. 4: No. 1, Article 3. Available at: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/rpj/vol4/iss1/3  

What does it mean to have respect for the goods of others? Fr. Mike unpacks the Catechism's answer to this question and what it teaches about the seventh commandment in regards to respect for persons and their goods. We learn that it comes down to the dignity of persons and the virtues of temperance, justice, and solidarity. Today's readings are Catechism paragraphs 2407-2414. This episode has been found to be in conformity with the Catechism by the Institute on the Catechism, under the Subcommittee on the Catechism, USCCB. For the complete reading plan, visit ascensionpress.com/ciy Please note: The Catechism of the Catholic Church contains adult themes that may not be suitable for children - parental discretion is advised.

Today's "social justice" masquerades as truth but is completely untethered from God and his self-revelation in Scripture. To rightly understand justice, we must ground our thinking firmly in the Word of God. Timestamps Introduction - 00:28 What's the Big Picture that We Need on Justice? - 04:16 Justice Is a Moral and Essential Attribute of God - 06:44 Key Texts, Acts, & Events to Help Us Define God's Justice - 14:37 The Different Types of Justice and the Law of God - 19:52 Distributive Justice vs. Social Justice - 25:53 Thomas Sowell & Justice - 33:33 Doctrinal Clarity on Justice - 37:40 Vertical and Horizontal Implications of God's Justice - 42:40 Where Can Pastors Go to Feed the Flock on God's Justice? - 46:57 Outro - 53:09 Resources to Click Thinking Biblically and Theologically About Justice by Stephen Wellum   Books to Read Why Social Justice Is Not Biblical Justice: An Urgent Appeal to Fellow Christians in a Time of Social Crisis – Scott David Allen Reformed Dogmatics – Geerhardus Vos Systematic Theology – Louis Berkhof The Doctrine of God – John Frame

In part one of our ongoing investigation of Ethical Leadership with Aya Musbahi and Salman Ahmed, listeners were invited to consider the concept of “ethical leadership,” as well as how this can be applied to surgeons in the modern health service. This second episode discusses the issue of efficiency in the context of healthcare, and how questions of efficiency and service delivery often become issues of ethics and leadership. The episode is structured in two segments, with the first featuring Aya and Salman discussing the realtionship between equity and efficiency in the context of issues such as employee performance; while in the second segment, Aya and Salman invite Kevin Magee, Chief Executive of Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust for a conversation on how health organisations can become ethically led, given current pressures such as resource scarcity and increasing wait times for operations. Opinions expressed in this podcast are the speakers' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Spravodlivosť je veľmi starý koncept a dnes vám chcem predstaviť a pozvať vás do rozmýšľania o spravodlivosti z pohľadu jednej relatívne nedávnej teórie. Jej autorom je americký filozof John Rawls a spravodlivosť by sme mali chápať ako férovosť.----more---- Prečítajte si túto dávku aj ako článok na SME.   Súvisiace dávky:   PD#245: Môže byť vojna spravodlivá?, http://bit.ly/davka245 PD#241: Rozhovor s Kusou a Vašečkom, http://bit.ly/davka241 PD#230: Platónov dialóg Gorgias, http://bit.ly/davka230   Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: John Rawls (SEP), https://stanford.io/3KlXSg6 Shapiro, „The Rawlsian Social Contract“, https://bit.ly/3OFxa5u   Shapiro, „Distributive Justice and the Welfare State“, https://bit.ly/3yaV5En Shapiro, „The "Political-not-Metaphysical" Legacy“, https://bit.ly/3MytIaY Philosophize This!, „John Rawls“, https://bit.ly/3KhAlNA BBC Radio 3, Arts & Ideas, „John Rawls's A Theory of Justice“, https://bbc.in/3xU6lo9 Philosophy Talk, „John Rawls“, https://bit.ly/3vNUh5e Partially Examined Life, „Rawls on Social Justice“, https://bit.ly/3KipkeR   ***   Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), podpor náš  ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar) a čo tak štýlový merč? (https://bit.ly/mercPD) Ďakujeme!  

Join us for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost with The University Church on September 12, 2021 as we look at a question posed by Jesus in one of his parables, "Am I Not Allowed To Do What I Choose With What Belongs To Me?

Join us for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost with The University Church on September 12, 2021 as we look at a question posed by Jesus in one of his parables, "Am I Not Allowed To Do What I Choose With What Belongs To Me?

In this episode we consider the limits of wealth distribution in society, inherent inequalities to life and the role of luck. We also explore the economic ideas of the commons and public goods and the role these play in free market and state capitalist societies. We also take a look at the social protection floor and why it is often conceptualised by society as something to be ashamed of. This leads us to consider the tight coupling of labour and income and the subsequent vulnerability of those without a job or in casual work, a class known as the precariat. All of this leads us to question social justice in wealth distribution and ask the question; could be another way to smooth the edges of income precarity?Show notesInequality in nature and society – Scheffer et al. 2017Iron & steel industry in Middlesbrough's historyTeesside Steel Works - WikipediaPlunder of the commons – Guy StandingWe're all state capitalists now – Niall Ferguson, Foreign PolicyThe Precariat: A dangerous new class – Guy StandingThe Here and Now Podcast on FacebookThe Here and Now Podcast on TwitterSend me an emailSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/thehereandnowpodcast)

Outside of government, most workers don’t know how much money their coworkers’ make. While such secrecy can create mistrust and turnover, an Academy of Management Journal article also finds that greater pay transparency can help boost retention in the situations where employees have a general feeling that they are being paid fairly. Dr. Peter A. Bamberger is a professor of Organizational Management at Tel Aviv University’s Coller School of Management. He’s one of the authors of the Academy of Management Journal paper “Best not to Know: Pay Secrecy, Employee Voluntary Turnover, and the Conditioning Effect of Distributive Justice.” He joined the show to talk about pay secrecy and its impacts in organizations.  

The goal of the Easy Essay is to blow the dynamite of Catholic Social Teaching by boiling down key ideas into short and simple essays. Re-introducing Easy Essays: https://tradistae.com/2019/05/30/re-introducing-easy-essays/  The full text of this Easy Essay: https://tradistae.com/2021/04/21/planning-regulation-and-distributive-justice/  The list of Easy Essays: https://tradistae.com/easy-essay-list/   

Aditi Bagchi teaches Contracts and Labor Law at Fordham University School of Law. She writes about the nature of contractual obligation, contract interpretation, and questions in political and moral philosophy as they arise in contract. She has a related interest in the comparative political economy of contract, labor and corporate law. Our conversation focused on private law, distributive justice, relational equality, and contract as procedural justice.

Carr Center Faculty Director, Mathias Risse, joins host Sushma Raman in a discussion on distributive justice, political philosophy, and human rights.

Carr Center Faculty Director, Mathias Risse, joins host Sushma Raman in a discussion on distributive justice, political philosophy, and human rights.

Professor Kedar will present his book Emptied Lands (co-authored with Amara and Yiftachel). Emptied Lands investigates the protracted legal, planning, and territorial conflict between the settler Israeli state and indigenous Bedouin citizens over traditional lands in southern Israel/Palestine. The authors place this dispute in historical, legal, geographical, and international- comparative perspectives, providing the first legal geographic analysis of the “dead Negev doctrine” used by Israel to dispossess and forcefully displace Bedouin inhabitants in order to Judaize the region. The authors reveal that through manipulative use of Ottoman, British and Israeli laws, the state has constructed its own version of terra nullius. Yet, the indigenous property and settlement system still functions, creating an ongoing resistance to the Jewish state. Emptied Lands critically examines several key land claims, court rulings, planning policies and development strategies, offering alternative local, regional, and international routes for justice. Professor Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar teaches at the Law School at the University of Haifa. He holds a Doctorate in Law (S.J.D) from Harvard Law School. He was a visiting professor at the University of Michigan Law School as well as a Grotius International Law Visiting Scholar there and a visiting associate professor at the Frankel Institute for Judaic studies in the University of Michigan. His research focuses on legal geography, legal history, law and society and land regimes in settler societies and in Israel. He served as the President of the Israeli Law and Society Association, is the co-coordinator of the Legal Geography CRN of the Law and Society Association and a member of its international committee. He is the co-founder (in 2003) and director of the Association for Distributive Justice, an Israeli NGO addressing these issues.

Professor Kedar will present his book Emptied Lands (co-authored with Amara and Yiftachel). Emptied Lands investigates the protracted legal, planning, and territorial conflict between the settler Israeli state and indigenous Bedouin citizens over traditional lands in southern Israel/Palestine. The authors place this dispute in historical, legal, geographical, and international- comparative perspectives, providing the first legal geographic analysis of the “dead Negev doctrine” used by Israel to dispossess and forcefully displace Bedouin inhabitants in order to Judaize the region. The authors reveal that through manipulative use of Ottoman, British and Israeli laws, the state has constructed its own version of terra nullius. Yet, the indigenous property and settlement system still functions, creating an ongoing resistance to the Jewish state. Emptied Lands critically examines several key land claims, court rulings, planning policies and development strategies, offering alternative local, regional, and international routes for justice. Professor Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar teaches at the Law School at the University of Haifa. He holds a Doctorate in Law (S.J.D) from Harvard Law School. He was a visiting professor at the University of Michigan Law School as well as a Grotius International Law Visiting Scholar there and a visiting associate professor at the Frankel Institute for Judaic studies in the University of Michigan. His research focuses on legal geography, legal history, law and society and land regimes in settler societies and in Israel. He served as the President of the Israeli Law and Society Association, is the co-coordinator of the Legal Geography CRN of the Law and Society Association and a member of its international committee. He is the co-founder (in 2003) and director of the Association for Distributive Justice, an Israeli NGO addressing these issues.

Prof. Sandy Kedar (Haifa) discusses his co-authored book on the legal rights of the Bedouin in the Negev. Kedar presents his book, Emptied Lands (co-authored with Amara and Yiftachel). Emptied Lands investigates the protracted legal, planning, and territorial conflict between the settler Israeli state and indigenous Bedouin citizens over traditional lands in southern Israel/Palestine. The authors place this dispute in historical, legal, geographical, and international- comparative perspectives, providing the first legal geographic analysis of the “dead Negev doctrine” used by Israel to dispossess and forcefully displace Bedouin inhabitants in order to Judaize the region. The authors reveal that through manipulative use of Ottoman, British and Israeli laws, the state has constructed its own version of terra nullius. Yet, the indigenous property and settlement system still functions, creating an ongoing resistance to the Jewish state. Emptied Lands critically examines several key land claims, court rulings, planning policies and development strategies, offering alternative local, regional, and international routes for justice. Professor Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar teaches at the Law School at the University of Haifa. He holds a Doctorate in Law (S.J.D) from Harvard Law School. He was a visiting professor at the University of Michigan Law School as well as a Grotius International Law Visiting Scholar there and a visiting associate professor at the Frankel Institute for Judaic studies in the University of Michigan. His research focuses on legal geography, legal history, law and society and land regimes in settler societies and in Israel. He served as the President of the Israeli Law and Society Association, is the co-coordinator of the Legal Geography CRN of the Law and Society Association and a member of its international committee. He is the co-founder (in 2003) and director of the Association for Distributive Justice, an Israeli NGO addressing these issues

In the recent sessions of Intersections, we have been pondering cornerstones that would mark the boundaries for the foundation of a faith and a Church relevant in this modern age. The cornerstones we set in place are: · Repentance· Respect· Humility· SacrificeSo now comes the big step of laying the foundational stones that will support our path forward into a way of life that God would gave us live. What should those foundational stones consist of: I would offer that it must be Justice. Justice in all it's many forms but in this episode we will delve into the Justice areas that we might not always consider but are desperately needed for our modern age: Distributive Justice & Restorative Justice. Support the show (https://www.facebook.com/donate/353364075293193/)

Join us for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost with The University Church on September 20, 2020 as we look at a parable in which Jesus asks (in paraphrased form), should people get only what they deserve, only what they’ve worked for, only what they’ve earned, or is there another way?

Join us for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost with The University Church on September 20, 2020 as we look at a parable in which Jesus asks (in paraphrased form), should people get only what they deserve, only what they’ve worked for, only what they’ve earned, or is there another way?

Show Notes: Privilege brings with it a sense of responsibility (4:00) Empowering others - "nurturing, supporting, and uplifting" (5:30) “Talent in unexpected locations" Levels of impact: individual and systems (7:45) Carrying people with you (8:20) POSSE Foundation (8:40) Compensatory and Distributive Justice (9:00) What she tells her students (10:45) Most proud of integrating race and gender into economics programs (11:00) What we are missing in the discourses of race and gender Difficult to reshape pre-conceived notions unless you allow everyone to explore (13:00) Interconnectedness of society and systems level thinking (14:00) A must read - Thinking in Systems by Donella Meadows Becoming more comfortable with complexity and uncertainty - Santa Fe Institute guidance during COVID-19Cecilia’s message during COVID-19 (15:00) The Top 100 from 100&Change Respond to COVID-19 (16:30) “We don’t have the luxury of backing away from challenges to focus on a single one” (18:30) MacArthur Fellows Program (19:00) Characteristics of fellows (24:30) Howard Gardner “fruitful asynchrony” and his book Creating Minds (26:00) Role of poetry in Cecilia’s life (27:50) Her published poem “Apathy" The Poetry Foundation (29:15) The On Being Project (30:00) Finding hope and despair right now (31:00) Second-line show for healthcare workers (32:15) 'Five-Cut Fridays’ series Cecilia’s list

Is it a good idea to have private security firms to carry out state justice? What is distributive justice and how does it shape ideology? Does the private sector serve society at large better than a capable state? If a government doesn't trust its citizens, what is the logical conclusion? Armed forces are trained to kill, so what happens when their barrels are aimed at their own citizens? Nando's · The Burning Platform

Is it a good idea to have private security firms to carry out state justice? What is distributive justice and how does it shape ideology? Does the private sector serve society at large better than a capable state? If a government doesn't trust its citizens, what is the logical conclusion? Armed forces are trained to kill, so what happens when their barrels are aimed at their own citizens? Nando's

Featured Interview: Deepening inequality due to COVID-19 -코로나19로 인한 불평등 심화 Guest: Professor Ju Byung-gi, Department of Economics at Seoul National University, Director of the Center for Distributive Justice

In Episode 5 of Dr. Dave On Call, we discuss medical ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic with Dr. Lisa Anderson-Shaw. She is the Former Director of the Clinical Ethics Consult Service, Assistant Clinical Professor at The University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused us to scrutinize our healthcare capacity, as we all try to do our own part to "flatten the curve". Some key questions arise: 1) What happens if I get COVID-19 and go to a hospital with limited healthcare resources? 2) What happens if there are a limited number of mechanical ventilators? 3) What protocols are in place during the COVID-19 pandemic to help guide these decisions? During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals will utilize the concepts of "Beneficence", an ethical principle that all actions are intended to benefit the patients. Beneficence of a patient must be balanced with the group of individuals who are affected. Further, "Distributive Justice" according to the Principles of Biomedical Ethics, refers to fair, equitable and appropriate distribution determined by justified norms that structure the terms of social cooperation. These 2 principles can help provide a foundation for a clinical decision model that providers will use during pandemics. A clinical model for decision making was created by Dr. Anderson-Shaw with Dr. Lin at The University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago in response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. This clinical model for decision making serves as a foundation for many hospital systems in our country today and will be an example model for the COVID-19 pandemic: This clinical decision model includes: 1) Formation of a Pandemic Triage Committee: This Committee would be a neutral and impartial entity serving as the supervising body when a medical center faces resource allocation decisions. 2) Phased allocation of resources: Maximize the utility of resources as dictated by the nature and severity of the situation. 3) Clinical evaluation: The pandemic triage protocol, defined based on levels of severity (3 levels in total) if resources are not exhausted, at capacity or over capacity. 4) Checklist of clinical progress: Using objective findings like SOFA scores and critical care color coded triage tools. 5) Palliative care protocol: For those who do not initially qualify for critical care and those who may not qualify for any reason. 6) Appeals process: The patient or decision maker has the ability to speak with the Attending Physician if there is a question/concern regarding the treatment plan. Also, a patients or decision maker could appeal to the Pandemic Triage Committee regarding decisions about who should or should not receive mechanical ventilators. 7) Early family involvement: Families of patients must be aware of the protocol and engaged into the clinical decision model from the beginning. If we reach our healthcare capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic and there is a shortage of mechanical ventilators, there will be a clinical decision model implemented by hospitals. This allows patients and their families clarity on how the resources are allocated during the COVID-19 pandemic. More questions, please visit us: https://drdaveoncall.com/wp/ (https://drdaveoncall.com/) Email us: hello@drdaveoncall.com Tweet us: https://twitter.com/drdaveoncall (https://twitter.com/drdaveoncall) Call us and leave us a voicemail: 1-877-DrDave5 Citations: Lin J., Anderson-Shaw L. Rationing of resources: Ethical issues in Disasters and Epidemic Situations. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X0000683X

In Episode #14, Leader, Communicator, Author and Social Justice Activist Danielle Strickland leads us into a conversation around the The Tri-Justice Model:  1) Egalitarian Justice, 2) Distributive Justice, & 3) Legislative Justice. Danielle brings us on a journey to discover how to actually bring about transformation in our world, what it really takes to get off the sidelines and and how to boldly step forward to be voices of hope in our culture today.

What can social scientists tell us about the world? How do psychology and history enrich economics? In this episode of the Governance Podcast, Jon Elster sits down with Mark Pennington to discuss the essential tasks and limitations of social science. Subscribe on iTunes and Spotify Subscribe to the Governance Podcast on iTunes and Spotify today and get all our latest episodes directly in your pocket. Follow Us For more information about our upcoming podcasts and events, follow us on facebook or twitter (@csgskcl). The Guest Jon Elster is the Robert K. Merton Professor of the Social Sciences at Columbia University. Before coming to Columbia, he taught in Paris, Oslo and Chicago. His publications include Ulysses and the Sirens (1979), Sour Grapes (1983), Making Sense of Marx (1985), The Cement of Society (1989), Solomonic Judgements (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (1989), Local Justice (1992) and Political Psychology (1993). His research interests include the theory of rational choice, the theory of distributive justice and the history of social thought (Marx and Tocqueville). He is currently working on a comparative study of constitution-making processes from the Federal Convention to the present and on a study of retroactive justice in countries that have recently emerged from authoritarian or totalitarian rule. Research interests include Theory of Rational Choice and the Theory of Distributive Justice. Skip Ahead 0:57: You're giving a talk at our Centre called ‘Emotions in History.' Can you explain the argument? 3:54: A lot of your work in the past has been engaged with rational choice models or economic models applied to various social phenomena in one form or another. You're now mentioning the role of psychology. What role should psychology play in relation to the kind of rationality-oriented work you've done in the past? 6:04: So you're saying that common sense rationality can play a role in understanding political institutions or economic institutions, or individual behaviour within them? 7:38: You say that about some of the Chicago-school understandings of institutions which imply that the institutions that are chosen are efficient in some sense—because if they weren't, rational agents would change them. Then it's hard to account for any sort of institutional change because equilibrium is built into the model. 8:50: If we don't explain the origin of institutions through a rational choice model, or at least if that model has quite serious limitations, is there any way in which a model that focuses on the psychological dimension or the emotional dimension provides a better explanation? 10:38: Would your view of institutions be more along the kind of model that recognizes that institutions are often the products of accidents that arise from conjunctions of all kinds of eventualities that really don't necessarily have more universal implications? 11:32: What can we say—or can we say anything—about whether certain kinds of institutions have beneficial properties relative to other kinds of institutions? 13:54: If we go back to this role of emotion: if emotion is an important factor in shaping institutions, the way they're formed and perhaps even the way they persist, that strikes me to imply that… people, because of emotion, create certain institutional structures that could be inefficient or malfunction in various ways… 16:49: What I was wondering was whether you were working with a model where emotional choice influences the way in which institutions are originally created, but then within that set of rules, is that the level at which a more rational choice type model kicks in? Or is it emotions all the way down? 18:26: I want to come to some of what you've written on the role of prediction within social science… but what I take from what you've just said there about the importance of specific cases and not generalizing too much is that you would be against the idea that even if we recognize the role of emotions in forming institutions, we can have a notion of institutional design to deal with the effects of emotional decision making … 21:52: Would it be fair to say that we might not know necessarily what are good decisions – certainly not in some optimizing sense, but can we say about what might be bad decisions? 23:23: So the next question I wanted to ask you is, given the role of indeterminacy, can you say a bit more about what you think are the excessive ambitions of contemporary social science? This is a theme that you've developed in your recent work: a lot of social science is about prediction… much of what you're saying is pushing back against that. 26:50: If prediction is limited, can we nevertheless have a model of social science which is based on understanding in very context-specific circumstances? 28:38: I think that one of the interesting things to think about regarding uncertainty is that there are different views within political economy about this. As I understand, Keynes' view was that uncertainty was very much with us and that the role of statecraft is to manage that uncertainty in a creative way… 30:25: Can we speak a little more about the importance of history? One of the pieces that some of our students read in one of our courses on political economy has some criticisms that you made of the analytic narrative model in political economy—and that's often an attempt to use rational choice type models to understand particular historical episodes. And the argument you made there, as I understand it, is that they are sort of retrofit models. People are picking the history to fit the rational choice type explanation. 34:46: So that sounds very much to be part of what I take of what you're saying here, which is that there needs to be a lot more humility from various analysts about what they claim for their particular models, given the nature of the subject matter. 36:28: One of the authors we're studying at our research centre is Elinor Ostrom and her account of common pool resource management. She is famous for challenging some of the implications that came from one simple model of rational choice: the idea that there is a commons problem—that whenever you don't have ownership rights of some kind, you have a tragedy of the commons. 40:23: Earlier, you were reflecting on areas where you think you've been wrong over what's been a very distinguished career… 42:41: One of the areas where you've applied this notion is giving micro-foundations to Marxist-style explanations. You're one of the influencers behind the analytical Marxist movement. Did that turn out to be a fruitful research paradigm or not? 43:48: In what sense does the early part of Marx remain with us? What's the residual power of the insight? 46:28: Are there any other areas you'd like to talk about where you think what you were writing about in the past wasn't right? 47:40: What are you working on at the moment?