POPULARITY
This theoretical conversation is an E-publication and not encyclopaedic but framed in ISBN978-976-96294-0-0 titled Social Psychology of Culture in 20 chapters and 385 pages. Historically, and metaphorically, although the links of culture and psychology from antiquity to the present time the roots of interest in culture are traced to the social practices of travel—exploration, trade, conquest, and administration that lead to experiencing other human beings living by very different practices.The annals of history have unearthed the fact that Psychology emerged in the eighteenth and nineteenth century although there is a perception that in the European space it was thought that the same carried various cultural prejudices into its mainstream. Conversely, this took place in the context of basic philosophical tension between nature and nurture as causal streams resulting in cultural differences. What is uniquely interesting over most of the period nurture predominated, with a sharp reversal during the nineteenth century when race came to the fore. Yet it was after the middle of that century that the terminology began to change and culture, the name, not the concept entered the vocabulary. In view of the aforesaid has set in motion the ethos whereby Cultural psychology of today is in a position to see mind and culture as mutually constituted. Arguably, Social Psychology is an accumulative nuance and a scientific study of social behaviour. Metaphorically global citizens are consider conduits whereby this nuance is dispensed and discussed in a practical and theoretical context. It also considers how global citizens perceive other people and social situations, how we respond to others and they to us, and in general how we are affected by social situations. Presumably other in this context is premise on Edward Said’s theory Orientalism and the Study of the Self and the Other in Orwell’s Burmese Days argues Orientalism is affiliated with the representation of the Self or Occident and the Other or Orient in which the Self is privileged and has upper hand to define, reconstruct the passive, silent and weak Other. While Kenneth L. Karst also argues In America, at least from its colonial beginnings, race, religion, and ethnicity have been major sources of self-identification and identification by others. Edward Said’s theory combined together with Kenneth L. Karst creates the framework for this conversation Social Psychology of Culture. Further it should be noted that Kenneth L. Karst also argues, Predictably, religious differences appeared early in colonial history, and in some colonies these differences were the source of conflicts that were not limited to religious doctrine. In this context the roots of these conflicts can be found in the fear of outsiders that are part of the process of personality formation in every human tribe. Members of cultural groups often regard themselves as the "true" people and regard outsiders as inferior.1CHAPTER 1 SOCIAL FRAMEWORK- CHAPTER 2 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY FRAMEWORK ,CHAPTER 3 CULTURE FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 4 PERSON PERCEPTION Social perceptionCHAPTER 5 SOCIAL COGNITION Members of different culturesCHAPTER 3 CULTURE FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 6 HUMAN BEHAVIOUR People within organizationsChapter 7 CULTURAL EFFECTS ON BEHAVIOUR CHAPTER 8 SOCIAL CHANGE-SocietiesCHAPTER 10 ATTRIBUTION CHAPTER 11 ATTITUDES How Your Culture Affects Your Work AttitudeCHAPTER 12 PREJUDICE CHAPTER 14 GENDER Culture and societyCHAPTER 15 BEHAVIOUR IN GROUPS CHAPTER 16 PRO SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR Culture and Group BSupport the show (http://www.buzzsprout.com/429292)