Physics to God

Physics to God is a guided journey through modern physics to discover God. We start from the fine tuning of the constants of nature, travel through the multiverse, and ultimately arrive at a compelling idea of God.

The first objective of this podcast series is to clearly explain the following claim: When probing the universe at its most fundamental levels, physicists have discovered many constants of nature which present a major challenge to the pursuit of a theory of everything. To do this, we use helpful analogies to explain the idea of fundamental physics and explain the roles of fundamental particles and laws. Then, we introduce the idea of constants of nature, specific numbers which are built into the fundamental particles and laws of nature. Lastly, we explain physicists' dream of finding a theory of everything, one set of laws that explains everything in our universe. Join the discussion on our website https://www.physicstogod.com/ or  our Facebook group, Physics to God. 

This episode shows how the specific values of the constants present a serious problem for the realization of physicists' dream of finding a Theory of Everything. It explains the mystery of constants, a problem which Richard Feynman called “one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics.” The mystery is that the numbers seem completely arbitrary with no seeming reason for their values. From the perspective of physics, these numbers could have taken on any value whatsoever. So how can physicists explain these numbers? Join the discussion on our website https://www.physicstogod.com/ or  our Facebook group, Physics to God. 

In this episode, we explain fine tuning, the major clue that physicists have discovered to help solve the mystery of the constants. The idea of fine tuning is that the constants of nature are not just arbitrary numbers, but there's something special about their values. Only numbers within a certain range of values will yield a universe with atoms, molecules, planets, stars, galaxies, etc. Join the discussion on our website https://www.physicstogod.com/ or  our Facebook group, Physics to God. 

This episode illustrates how fine tuning presents a major problem to the ordinary scientific method for explaining phenomena in our universe. Through an analogy from ethical systems, it demonstrates why a paradigm shift is needed to solve the mystery of the constants. Join the discussion on our website https://www.physicstogod.com/ or  our Facebook group, Physics to God.

This episode presents the climax of the fine tuning argument. Through simple analogies, it explains the definition of efficient and teleological causes, and why they are so vital for interpreting fine tuning and completing the journey from physics to God. It demonstrates how fine tuning indicates that the values of the constants were chosen by an intelligent cause, God, for the purpose of bringing about a complex universe which is full of atoms, molecules, stars, planets, and life.  If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

This episode discusses the differences between the design argument in biology and the fine tuning argument in physics. First, we present the design argument in biology. Then, we discuss how the theory of evolution explains the apparent design of life without an intelligent cause. We explain why that solution doesn't work in physics, and show how, even in the framework of biology, it merely pushes the design question back to the origin of life  - the design of the first DNA molecule.  We then discuss the scientific answer to the origin of life problem: the multiplanet solution. We show how this type of explanation isn't justified in physics. Lastly, we go even further and show that fine tuning in physics can shed new light on design in biology. All this will clarify the major advantages of the fine tuning argument in physics over the design argument in biology. If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

In this episode, we move on from the fine tuning argument which focused on the quantities in the laws of nature (such as how big an electron is) and turn to the design of the qualitative laws of nature themselves (like the law of gravity that all masses attract). We present a design argument from physics and argue that the qualitative laws of physics, quantum mechanics and general relativity, exhibit clear signs of being designed.  Once again, we do not argue about science, as the intelligent design argument does in biology. Rather we accept the scientific position about the laws of physics and only argue about the proper philosophical conclusion to be inferred from these laws. This leads to an independent support for the existence of an intelligent cause of our universe. If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

Even with the right laws and constants, it is still very unlikely that chance alone could be responsible for our complex universe. In order to get a universe like our own, the spacetime and matter that comprise it must be arranged in a very improbable state. We discuss entropy and the second law of thermodynamics, and illustrate how they shed light on the ordered initial conditions of our universe. This leads to a third, independent argument for how we know that our universe has an intelligent cause. If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

In this episode, we complete our final argument and convincingly show that the low entropy initial conditions at the big bang point directly to an intelligent cause for the order in our universe - what we'll call an intelligent orderer. In doing so, we'll encounter an amazing, mind-bogglingly gargantuan number. Once we explain how massive this number actually is, you'll see how massively unlikely it is that our universe emerged by chance alone. If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

In this series, we've presented three arguments for an intelligent cause: the first from the fine tuning of the constants, the second from the design of the laws, and the third from the initial conditions at the big bang. In this episode, the final one in this series, we'll summarize the prior episodes so that you can clearly see the logical line of reasoning that flows through all three arguments. Then, we'll address many frequently asked questions on these arguments. Finally, we'll explain the need and motivation for the next two series about God and the multiverse. If you have any comments or questions, join the discussion on our website PhysicstoGod.com, or on our Facebook group, Physics to God.

Many people are already familiar with various presentations of the fine-tuning argument in discussions about the existence of God. Standard forms of the argument are often lacking and leave much room for skepticism and debate. Critics often point to the limitations of existing forms, such as when fine-tuning is presented as an “argument from elimination” that fails to demonstrate that the list of possibilities is either fully eliminated or whether the list of possibilities is truly exhaustive. Likewise, the “probabilistic approach” is often beset by unconvincing and speculative probabilities. These can lead to unsatisfactory conclusions for those seeking a more definitive understanding of our universe's precise constants and the implications of their existence. In this episode, Aaron and Elie offer a fresh perspective that is tailored to a more advanced audience that is already familiar with the conventional treatments of the fine-tuning argument, focusing on the intrinsic mystery of the constants and suggesting that fine-tuning is not the problem, but is rather the all-important clue to the solution of the mystery. They articulate why their approach avoids the pitfalls of other arguments, such as the God-of-the-gaps critique, and present fine-tuning as an answer to one of physics' fundamental questions, establishing a robust case for an intelligently designed universe that is compelling even to an audience well-versed in the topic. This presentation, a bit more advanced and informal than other episodes of Physics to God, was made to a group of scholars from Reasons to Believe. If you're interested in a good summary of the three core arguments in series one, see: https://www.physicstogod.com/3-proofs-of-god-from-science