Podcasts about Argument

Send us Fan MailWhat happens when the most powerful politician on earth picks up the phone to dispute a referee's call?Gavin Tighe and Stephen Thiele step away from Canadian courtrooms and onto the World Cup pitch, examining FIFA's controversial reversal of a red card suspension following a phone call from U.S. President Donald Trump to FIFA president Gianni Infantino. What begins as sports talk becomes sharp legal commentary on due process, transparency, and the rule of law… the same principles that underpin the Canadian legal system and every functional democracy. From FIFA's opaque Article 27 to Belgium's dismissed appeal and historical precedents dating back to 1962, Gavin and Stephen reveal why arbitrary decision-making erodes public trust, whether in a stadium or a courtroom. Listeners will come away understanding why process, not outcomes, is what earns respect for institutions.  Listen For:5:04 What did Gianni Infantino admit about Trump's phone call?9:07 What precedent did Brazil's 1962 Garrincha red card set?12:32 How did FIFA use Article 27 to suspend Balogun's suspension?13:35 Why does FIFA's reversal reveal a lack of rule of law?20:21 What would genuine due process for red card appeals require? Leave a rating/review for this podcast with one click Contact UsGardiner Roberts website | Gavin email | Stephen email  

BONUS PODCAST EPISODES HERE - https://www.patreon.com/zaneandheathSUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEW SHOW! -  https://www.youtube.com/@UCJR-nbRSN8g4VJMYJDxPY4wThanks to our sponsors: SeatGeek, BetterHelp, and DripDrop!SeatGeek:Use our code for 10% off your next SeatGeek order*: https://seatgeek.onelink.me/RrnK/UNFILTERED2026 Sponsored by SeatGeek. *Restrictions apply. Max $20 discountBetterHelp:Don't let stigma stand in the way of support. Start therapy with BetterHelp! Sign up and get 10% your first month at https://www.betterhelp.com/zaneandheathDripDrop:DripDrop is doctor-developed, proven fast hydration that helps your body and mind work better. Right now, DripDrop is offering our listeners 20% off your first order. Go to https://www.dripdrop.com and use promo code UNFILTERED.For any business inquiries, email us here: zaneandheathpodcast@gmail.comKEEP UP WITH US ON SNAPCHAT:Zane - @zaneHeath - @heath_hussarSUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHANNELS:Zane -    @ZaneHijaziHeath -     @HeathHussarFOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM:Zane - https://www.instagram.com/zaneHeath - https://www.instagram.com/heathhussarMariah - https://www.instagram.com/mariahamatoMatt - https://www.instagram.com/mattrking

The veneration of saints in the logic of the Incarnation, the infallible interpretation of Scripture, catechizing my kids and more on today's Called to Communion with Dr. David Anders.

The Hotlanta peaches are keeping things spicy in Scotland as the aftermath of Porsha Williams and Shamea Morton's mama drama plays out. Our "Virtual Reali-Tea" co-hosts, Danny Murphy and Evan Real, are reunited to unpack all the drama from season 17, episode 15. The ladies head to a club for Phaedra Parks' birthday celebration, which ended abruptly when Porsha Irish exited after Shamea's arrival. K. Michelle opens up about her near-death experience, leading to an emotional dinner. Check out the full recap now! "Real Housewives of Atlanta" airs Sundays at 8 p.m. ET on Bravo and is available to stream the next day on Peacock. Follow us on Instagram! Sign up for our newsletter! Check us out on YouTube! Head to our show page for more tea! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A gem of a mid-July podcast with The Sage and Joe. Enjoy! The wisdom and fun of Ira and Joe is presented by Bill Currie Ford. Click play above or listen at Apple Podcasts or Podbean.com. Many other platforms, too, […] The post Ira Kaufman Talks Alex Anzalone Diss, Roster Value, Jake Browning, The Other Side Of The Mayfield Argument, Fresh “Quarterback” Insights, And More appeared first on JoeBucsFan.com.

Sunday July 5th 7am (pst) / 10am (est) LIVE-Stream Bible Study on Sunday Mornings... Romans 16:1: We explore the "straw man" & "steel man" arguments regarding a female deacon. Is it an office or just another servant role, and is Acts 6 a solid biblical prototype for a deacon? That and much more as we unpack Biblical  thought on today's topic.

Shaun and Tiki talk about the possibility of the Yankees making an offer for Francisco Lindor.

You’re listening to American Ground Radio with Stephen Parr and Louis R. Avallone. This is the full show for July 16, 2026. We open with a story that should trigger Logan Act investigations — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch has revealed that New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani attempted to arrange a secret meeting with the Iranian government while the United States is actively engaged in military operations against Iran. We walk through the constitutional principle at stake: the United States speaks with one voice in foreign affairs, that voice belongs to the federal government, and a city mayor has no more authority to conduct foreign policy than he has to declare war. We also connect it to a pattern — from Obama's hot mic moment with Medvedev to John Kerry's shadow diplomacy during Trump's first term — of people who want the power of the presidency without the accountability of holding it. In our Top 3 Things You Need to Know, the U.S. launched strikes against Iran for the sixth consecutive day — targeting air defenses, rocket and drone facilities, and ports, with reports of 35 killed and 300 wounded in Iran, and a blockade-running ship disabled after repeated warnings. Then President Trump fired a newly appointed federal prosecutor in Seattle less than an hour into his first day on the job — a position filled by federal judges after Democrat Senate obstruction left the slot unconfirmed for more than 120 days. And a former Marine and congressional candidate in Florida was arrested for posting videos to social media calling for the murder of President Trump, describing him as the Antichrist, and advising what weapons and shooting patterns should be used — the latest of more than 20 documented assassination plots against the president, by far the most in American history. We also cover the Trump administration restoring the public charge rule — requiring that applicants for lawful permanent residence demonstrate they can support themselves without depending on government assistance. We explain why this was standard immigration practice throughout most of American history, why it is the policy of virtually every developed nation on earth, and why the most compassionate thing you can say to someone who wants to become an American is that we believe you can make it here on your own. Our American Mama Teri Netterville responds to a podcast host who said she doesn't trust any mother who wants to be with her children all day — and that homeschooling is weird. Teri's answer is simple and devastating: children are not a burden. They are a reward from God, an inheritance, arrows that parents are called to form and launch into the world for impact. The proof showed up at a stoplight on the way to the studio — Psalm 127, in a bumper sticker, on a car Teri had never seen before, minutes before a segment she didn't know she'd be having. She calls it a God thing. We do too. We dig deep into Senator Elissa Slotkin's remarks at a Michigan town hall — where she explained her opposition to the SAVE Act by saying it would make it impossible for any Democrat to win any election anywhere. We play the clip. We let her words sit. And we point out that if requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote is what makes Democrats lose elections, Senator Slotkin has just told you everything you need to know about who has been voting in Democratic primaries. The SAVE Act doesn't prevent anyone who is legally entitled to vote from voting. It just makes sure people who aren't legally entitled to vote don't get to cancel out the votes of those who are. We also cover Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego and reports that he had relationships with multiple congressional staffers before his marriage — and use it to return to the core principle that power causes brain damage. The part of the brain that processes empathy is measurably suppressed in people who accumulate power and believe they deserve it. The only people largely immune to this effect are those who genuinely believe they don't deserve the power they have. Public office is a public trust — and the people underneath you in that office are not perks of the position. We also cover a White House teleprompter technician who allegedly fed Trump's speech content into prediction markets before the speeches were delivered — trading on insider access to profit from words she was trusted to keep confidential. Every position of trust comes with an obligation of restraint. Some people just haven't figured that out yet. For our Bright Spot, the New York Times ran a piece headlined Mom, Dad, I Want to Be a Welder — following young Americans in their twenties who had the grades for college, chose trade school instead, and are thriving. Trade school enrollment is up nearly 20% since 2020. Starting salaries for skilled tradespeople now beat many college-educated entry-level positions. And a 23-year-old welder from Arkansas named LaDonna Glass said it best — she felt like if she didn't go to college she would be a failure. She isn't. We close with Earl Nightingale's definition of success — the progressive realization of a worthy goal — and note that success begins the moment you commit to something worthy of your time, your talents, and your character. And we close with a 2007 photograph taken at a Barcelona charity raffle — a baby boy named Lamin Yamal posing with a young Argentine footballer named Lionel Messi. Eighteen years later, Lamin Yamal is on the Spanish World Cup team and Messi is considered the greatest of all time — and the two people in that photo are about to face each other in the World Cup final. May your pursuit of happiness bring you joy. Listen now wherever you get your podcasts, visit AmericanGroundRadio.com, and join the conversation at 866-AGR-1776!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Caitlin Clark struggled Wednesday night...in the Indiana Fever loss to the Golden State Valkyries. But the biggest story coming out of the game...is Caitlin Clark crashing out in the second quarter. Caitlin Clark got into a tense exchange with WNBA officials...after referees missed an obvious call on a play that injured Caitlin Clark. We reveal and react to Caitlin Clark crashing out...and having a meltdown. We discuss the increased frequency of Caitlin Clark meltdowns...and explain why Caitlin Clark is increasingly frustrated. We question how much more Caitlin Clark can take...and whether Caitlin Clark could walk away from the WNBA. SUBSCRIBE TO BEHIND THE LINE - SHORTS: https://www.youtube.com/@btlshorts-84

Yesterday, Miller High Life, a Molson Coors brand, announced an interesting new position. The beermaker is looking for a Mayor of the "Champagne of Beers" region—and that region is oddly specific.​Odd jobs work as PR stunts. Remember when Custom Cones USA offered a $70,000 salary for the "Ultimate Stoner Dream Job,' which was basically a content creator who smoked weed every day—they reportedly had so many applicants that they were overwhelmed by the response.​Well, this one isn't as lucrative, but it would be a banger for the resume. The winner will be the candidate who "best embodies the passion for High Life—and what it means to call the home of Miller High Life your own."​The prize package is ... fine. It includes an exclusive dinner for eight at the Miller Caves, a historic part of the Miller Brewery dating back to 1849. The winner also receives a pair of High Life t-shirts, two hats, and a $2,000 check to basically pay the taxes on the prize. The winner also walks away with two cases of High Life, which seems low. I feel like the Mayor of the Champagne of Beers Region should score a few more than 48 beers.​Furthermore, the winner must also attend an “honorary Mayor Inauguration” at the Miller Visitor's Center in Milwaukee on September 19, 2026, or the prize will be forfeited in its entirety. All told, the Mayor of the "Champagne of Beers" region will land a salary valued at $6,500.​Molson Coors is technically a sponsor, and Merkle, a company that specializes in digital marketing experiences, is running the show.​To enter, you must live in one of about 86 zip codes, not mine, and be 25 years old—or older.​To win, you must not only be eligible but also submit to a confidential background check. Miller needs to make sure the winner hasn't engaged in any brand-damaging conduct. They certainly don't want to trigger a negative viral response — looking at you, Bud Light.​The contest began yesterday at noon CT and will end on August 23, 2026, at midnight.​Each contestant must include an original essay -- which is loose given that it's 250 words or less -- describing why they should be the mayor of the High Life, as well as a photo of them living the “High Life”. What would that be? Given that it's summer in Wisconsin, I figure it's some sort of tubing or pontoon-related photo. Oh, and it can't be AI-generated, any of it.​Of course, there are a host of rules that you can break with this essay, but they seem straightforward. For example, you can't make any deceptive or unsubstantiated claims about Molson Coors products, you can't mention any brand or trademark not owned by the company, and you can even get DQ'd if you have unauthorized third-party content or art in the background of your photo.​The winner will be chosen by a panel of "qualified judges" who will score each submission based on the following.50%: Passion for High Life25%: Originality (stands out as memorable)25%: Strength of Argument (why you should be picked over everyone else).​Do you have what it takes to be the Mayor of the "Champagne of Beers" region? If so, good luck.#MillerHighLife, #MolsonCoors, #Beer, #Wisconsin, #Milwaukee, #Manufacturing, #FoodManufacturing, #Marketing, #Branding, #Contest, #Jobs, #PRStunt, #Brewery, #MadeInWisconsin, #ChampagneOfBeers

Modelle wie die von OpenAI oder Anthropic werden zur Commodity. Wer ein bisschen wartet, bekommt die gleiche Qualität ohnehin von mehreren Anbietern. Was bleibt, ist die Architektur drumherum, der Harness. Oliver und Alois erklären, wie Unternehmen General-Purpose-Modelle mit Speicher, Prompts und Agenten so einbetten, dass ein verlässliches eigenes System entsteht. Für manche Startups ist das schon die neue Core IT der Firma.Ein Thema ist das Geschäftsmodell dahinter: günstige Einstiegszugänge für 100 bis 300 Dollar im Monat binden Early Adopter in Teams, bis am Ende die großen Enterprise-Tickets über die API laufen.Lizenzchaos als Symptom: Kontingente wechseln wöchentlich, Power User werden automatisch gedrosselt, SLAs sind kaum planbar. Was früher eine feste DSL-Leitung war, ist heute eine Blackbox mit wechselnder Durchsatzrate. Wer eine verlässliche Entwicklungsstrecke bauen will, baut sie momentan auf Treibsand.Für Oliver und Alois ist das ein Argument für Dezentralisierung: eigene On-Prem-Architekturen, eingefrorene Modelle für stabile Use Cases, das Frontier-Modell nur noch als Dispatcher. Gerade im Verteidigungssektor, mit verteilten Datenquellen und Sensorik, wird daraus ein hierarchischer oder asymmetrischer Harness aus Spezialmodellen.China im Vergleich: weniger Brute Force, mehr Smart Force, dazu eine Open-Source-Szene, die mit weniger Rechenleistung mehr rausholt. Für europäische Anwender sind chinesische und amerikanische Modelle inzwischen ähnlich compliant. Bei sensiblen Workloads bleibt trotzdem die eigene Infrastruktur die sicherere Wahl.Für den Einstieg raten beide zu fertigen Plattformlösungen mit fester Modellauswahl. Das senkt die Hürde und liefert schnell ein erstes Ergebnis. Je klarer der eigene Use Case wird und je mehr proprietäre Daten und Geschäftslogik einfließen, desto mehr lohnt sich der Wechsel zum eigenen Harness statt der fremden One-Click-Lösung.Fazit: Harnessing ist am Ende eine Make-or-Buy-Entscheidung. Die großen Anbieter liefern den Göffel, die Mischung aus Löffel und Gabel für fast alles. Wer sein eigenes Besteck zusammenstellt, tauscht die stumpfe Gabel gegen ein schärferes Werkzeug, sobald der Use Case es verlangt. Wenn du wissen willst, wie das geht, ist diese Folge für dich.

Ken and Anthony try to figure out whether or not it's better to stay in permanent Daylight Savings Time, or if we should continue to change our clocks twice a year.

Why do so many argument scenes feel strangely lifeless, even when characters are shouting, interrupting each other, and making excellent points?Because conflict isn't about disagreement.It's about change.In this episode of Master Fiction Writing, I'll explore why professional argument scenes feel so compelling, why amateur ones often become disguised exposition, and what readers are really looking for when two characters collide.You'll discover why characters rarely argue about the thing they're actually arguing about, why objectives matter more than opinions, how identity drives conflict, and why the best arguments permanently alter relationships rather than simply exchange information.Whether you're writing literary fiction, crime, fantasy, romance, historical fiction or memoir, this episode will change the way you think about dialogue, conflict and scene construction.Why arguments aren't conversations - they're attempts to change another person.The hidden reason most fictional arguments fall flat.Why readers care more about emotional change than who's right.How objectives create dramatic momentum.Why characters defend identity more fiercely than opinions.The psychology behind memorable conflict.How every argument should function as a miniature story.Why winning almost always comes at a cost.The importance of reversals, emotional movement and consequences.Great argument scenes aren't built around disagreement.They're built around incompatible futures.When two characters argue, each is trying to reshape the other's world in some way. Every line of dialogue should pursue an objective, every tactic should evolve when it fails, and every scene should leave the relationship changed.Readers don't become invested because someone wins the debate.They become invested because something valuable is at risk.Try this exercise:Choose one argument scene from your current manuscript and ask yourself:What does each character want before the conversation begins?What future is each character trying to create?What identity is each character protecting?What changes by the end of the scene?If the argument disappeared completely, would the story still work?If you struggle to answer those questions, you've probably found the scene's biggest opportunity for revision.The next time you write an argument, stop asking:“What are my characters talking about?”Instead ask:“Who is trying to change whom—and what happens if they fail?”That single shift in perspective will transform the way you approach dialogue.If you'd like coaching, visit: www.thebookcoach.coIn the next episode, ee'll move from theory into practice, exploring the tactics characters use when they're trying to win: humour, guilt, silence, interruption, subtext, emotional escalation and the invisible strategies that make dialogue feel alive.If you enjoyed this episode, please consider subscribing to Master Fiction Writing. Reviews and recommendations help other writers discover the show, and if you know someone wrestling with dialogue or conflict, send this episode their way.After all, every writer has written an argument scene where two perfectly intelligent people calmly explain the theme of the novel to one another.You don't have to keep doing that.

Avec : Benjamin Amar, professeur d'histoire-géographie. Yael Mellul, ancienne avocate. Et Juliette Briens, journaliste à L'Incorrect. - Accompagnée de Charles Magnien et sa bande, Estelle Denis s'invite à la table des français pour traiter des sujets qui font leur quotidien. Société, conso, actualité, débats, coup de gueule, coups de cœurs… En simultané sur RMC Story.

Everywhere Rome fell, civilization transformed. In Britain, it stopped.That's not a myth. That's what actually happened. Everywhere else the empire fell — Gaul, Hispania, Italy, North Africa — the barbarian successor kingdoms absorbed Roman administration and kept the machine running. The Franks kept Roman law. The Visigoths kept the Christian church. The Ostrogoths kept the Senate and the aqueducts. Even the Vandals in North Africa kept Roman urban life going.In Britain, none of that happened. The Roman garrisons pulled out in 407. The emperor told the Britons to defend themselves in 410. And when the Anglo-Saxons arrived, they didn't do what every other post-Roman successor group did. They didn't inherit. They built wooden halls next to abandoned Roman villas and let the villas fall down. Latin didn't evolve into a Romance language the way it did in Gaul and Hispania — it just vanished. Christianity didn't survive the transition — Pope Gregory the Great had to send Augustine of Canterbury in 597 to start over from pagan ground. Cities didn't get built on top of the old Roman ones — they got built somewhere else while Colchester sat empty for centuries.This is Episode 4 of the "Life After the Fall of Rome" series. Britain is the comparison case for the whole thesis. Everywhere else Rome fell, it transformed. Britain is the exception that proves the rule — the one place where the Hollywood version of the fall (villas abandoned, libraries lost, languages disappeared, lights actually going out) turned out to be true. And the reason it happened is quieter and more dangerous than any invasion narrative: successors who chose not to inherit.The barbarians didn't destroy Roman Britain. Roman Britain was already failing on its own. What the Anglo-Saxons did was build something entirely different on top of it — a new culture with no interest in preserving what came before. That indifference, more than any battle, is what real collapse actually looks like.If you're new to the series, start with Episode 1 ("Rome Didn't Fall — Here's What Actually Happened") linked below.

Are Yankees fans allowed to complain about their team since they make the playoffs every year? Bart & Ty argue over sports fandom. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The episode delves into the biology of conflict, destructive conflict behaviors, preparing for hard conversations, fighting fair in conflict, money conversations in relationships, and concludes with a call to identify reoccurring conflict patterns in relationships.TakeawaysUnderstanding the biology of conflictIdentifying and addressing destructive conflict behaviorsChapters00:00 The Biology of Conflict03:23 Destructive Conflict Behaviors07:22 Preparing for Hard Conversations10:49 Fighting Fair in Conflict16:58 Money Conversations in Relationships18:55 Conclusion and Homework

In a world that pushes us toward division, Jesus calls us to something different: leading with humility, love, and belonging even when we disagree. This message explores how we can engage in difficult conversations with the heart of Christ, remembering that relationships matter more than winning arguments.

It sounds like a legal thriller, but it's real. Rex Heuermann confessed to eight murders during family sessions run by Allison Winter, a counselor now facing eighteen felonies for allegedly practicing without a license and billing insurance for more than sixty thousand dollars. Legal analyst Eric Faddis lays out why that detail could give Heuermann's defense a genuine argument on appeal, even though undoing a guilty plea is far harder than winning after a trial verdict.Faddis breaks down the privilege fight too, whether confidentiality still protects sessions with someone who wasn't actually licensed, and what that could mean for everything Heuermann said behind those walls.From there we move to the D4VD case, where a status conference and a new Hulu documentary landed at nearly the same moment in the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Faddis explains why the documentary's confident, on-camera commentary from an LAPD detective and the district attorney could actually help the defense during jury selection, and why moving the trial out of California could genuinely be on the table. We also dig into the purchase history investigators have flagged, chainsaws, a burn box, bags, and what Faddis says it suggests about how many people may have been involved, with the preliminary hearing set for the twenty-first.Every time one of these cases looks buttoned up, a new thread pulls it back open. We cover all three.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #D4VD #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #AllisonWinter #CelesteRivasHernandez #AppealTheory #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #PreliminaryHearing

 It sounds like a legal thriller, but it's real. Rex Heuermann confessed to eight murders during family sessions run by a woman with no license to be in the room, and now that detail might give his defense something to work with. Legal analyst Eric Faddis lays out the theory: Heuermann may have pled guilty in large part to spare his ex-wife and daughter from testifying about that confession, and if the confession itself was obtained through a fraudulent setup, the reasoning behind the plea could be challenged.Faddis is careful to note this wouldn't be an easy win. Undoing a guilty plea is far harder than winning an appeal after a trial verdict, but he calls it a creative avenue worth watching. From there, the conversation turns to privilege. Does confidentiality still protect conversations with someone who wasn't actually a licensed therapist? Faddis breaks down both sides of that fight, the government likely arguing the protection only covers real clinicians, the defense arguing it protects the patient regardless of the other person's paperwork.We also dig into the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and why it probably doesn't apply here since Winter wasn't a government employee acting on the state's behalf. Every time this case looks buttoned up, a new thread pulls it back open, and this might be one of the more consequential ones yet.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #AllisonWinter #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #GilgoBeach #AppealTheory #SuffolkCounty #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis #CriminalCase

Comedy and Westerns on a FridayFirst, a look at the events of the day.Then, Granby's Green Acres starring Gale Gordon and Bea Benederet, originally broadcast  July 10, 1950, 76 years ago, Granby Plants a Crop. What to plant? Corn? Wheat?Followed by Have Gun Wlll Travel starring John Dehner, originally broadcast July 10, 1960, 66 years ago, Five Days to Yuma.  Paladin is hired to deliver a British prisoner named Jeremy Thompson to the Carson City jail. Jeremy's drunken mother proves an unexpected problem. Then, Lux Radio Theater, originally broadcast July 10, 1939, 87 years ago, Ruggles of Red Gap starring Charles Laughton and Charlie Ruggles with Zasu Pitts. A proper British butler finds himself achieving a sense of equality in the wild American west. The last show of the season. Finally, Lum and Abner, originally broadcast July 10, 1935, 91 years ago, Lum and Abner Get Into an Argument.  Lum is planning to start Screen-O games at the Pine Ridge Planetarium. Lum dissolves the partnership. He will own all the movie theatre, Abner will own all the Jot 'Em Down Store! Thanks to Debbie B. for supporting our podcast by using the Buy Me a Coffee function at http://classicradio.streamIf you like what we do here, visit our friend Jay at http://radio.macinmind.com for great old-time radio shows 24 hours a day

Hour 2 of Jake & Ben on July 10, 2026 BYU Insider Mitch Harper joined the show to talk about BYU's upcoming season. It's a big year for Bear Bachmeier, can he live up to the hype? Who's Side do you take on this Donovan Mitchell Argument? Jake's or PK's? Audio Vault: Remember when the City of Cleveland Made a Song for LeBron James?

Seth and Luke discuss Luke's frustration with the obvious argument pundits keep making that we're seeing the best ever right now. It's obvious, right? Everything's the best ever right now.

Argument over stolen underwear on the way to weed dispensary ends with assault charge, Women is caught digging up plants outside a mall and stealing them, We've got a 93-year-old man who is still putting the hammer down on his big rig for trucking companySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 1 in full

Hier geht's zu Robert Steffen: https://www.robertsteffen.de/https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-steffen-wortarchitekt/https://www.instagram.com/robert_steffen_wortarchitekt/Hier geht's zum Verhandlungs-Bootcamp: https://verhandlungs-bootcamp.com/Wer überzeugend wirkt, verhandelt besser. Nicht weil er lügt — sondern weil er seinen Wert sichtbar macht. Keynote-Coach Robert Steffen zeigt, wie Präsenz, Stimme und klare Botschaft direkt auf den Verhandlungstisch einzahlen.In dieser Folge erfährst du:Warum Präsenz oft mehr entscheidet als das ArgumentWie deine Story deinen Preis beeinflusstWas Keynote-Speaker über Auftreten wissen — und du sofort anwenden kannstWie eine klare Botschaft Preisdiskussionen verhindertHier geht's zum Verhandlungs-Bootcamp: https://verhandlungs-bootcamp.com/Sichere dir deinen Platz und starte durch!Wenn du mit mir mal persönlich und live sprechen willst, dann buche dir hier einen Termin für deine kostenlose Verhandlungsstrategie:Abonniere diesen PodcastVernetzen wir uns auf Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericmathier/Termin mit Frédéric buchen: www.fredericmathier.comDanke für deine ***** Bewertung auf iTunes oder SpotifyInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/frederic_mathier/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@frederic_mathier/Wünsche dir erfolgreiche VerhandlungenFrédéric Mathier

Across the world, a familiar story is being retold with striking success: that stagnant wages, housing crises and crumbling public services are the fault of migrants and outsiders - not the billionaires and global systems quietly getting richer. It's a story reshaping elections, hardening divisions, and in some places, fuelling violence.In this episode of Think Change, Sara Pantuliano is joined by Dimi Reider (Othering and Belonging Institute / Shared Futures Institute), Tania Cheung, Libby Lenkinski and Kathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou to ask: why do stories so often beat facts? Why has fact-checking failed to stop divisive narratives from taking hold? And what would it actually take to build a competing story - one rooted in justice and redistribution, not nostalgia for a status quo that wasn't working either?The conversation ranges from the mechanics of how harmful narratives spread, to what's breaking down in how NGOs and philanthropy communicate, to where power, money and attention need to shift if progressive narratives are ever going to compete.Guests:Sara Pantuliano (host), Chief Executive, ODI GlobalTania Cheung, Head of the Shifting the Power Programme at Comic Relief Dimi Reider, journalist, policy analyst and facilitator at the Othering and Belonging Institute and Shared Futures Institute Libby Lenkinski, Founding President of Albi and Vice President for Public Engagement at the New Israel FundKathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou, Director Politics and Governance, ODI Global Related resources:Building Narratives for Change: where culture strategy meets policy (Event recording, ODI Global)ODI Global Strategy, 2026-2031Shifting Narratives: From Aid to Agency Shifting the Power Comms Lab Report (Report, Comic Relief)

Andie is tired of James leaving breakable items in peril! He plates, microwave dishes full of hot food, and even his ipad hanging on the edge of their countertops and tables. James says it's easier to pick up items when they are not flush with the surface. But it stresses Andie out! She's worried one errant hip bump will send all the hot food flying. James argues that saving a plate from crashing to the floor is the ULTIMATE thrill. Who's right? Thanks to reddit user u/banjo_solo for naming this week's case! To suggest a title for a future episode, keep an eye on the Maximum Fun subreddit at reddit.com/r/maximumfun! ---Judge John Hodgman is member-supported! Become a member to unlock special bonus episodes and more. Memberships start at just $5 a month. Just tap here!

Got some sh!t to say?In this ENCORE episode, Marko and Steve dive into the all-too-common experience of having the same argument repeatedly with your partner. They explore how these recurring conflicts can lead to frustration and emotional fatigue, especially when the core issue remains unresolved. The conversation highlights the importance of genuine listening and emotional presence in relationships, emphasizing that without true understanding and communication, couples can find themselves stuck in a cycle of repetition. Marko and Steve also offer insights into why these patterns form and suggest strategies for breaking the loop and fostering healthier dialogue. To wrap things up, they tackle the week's Listener Sh!tuation, offering their thoughts and guidance on a real life dilemma from the audience.-Articles:Psychology Today | 4 Reasons Couples Keep Repeating the Same ArgumentsWell + Good | How To Get Off the Hamster Wheel of Having the Same Argument on RepeatSupport the showSh!t | Leave us a voicemail with your relationship sh!tuation at (903) POD- SHIT.  That's (903) 763-7448.  You can also fill out a Listener Sh!tuation on our website, podrelationshit.com, or email us at relationshitquestions@gmail.com. Visit Us |www.podrelationshit.com for more Relationsh!t content and information about the podcast.Donate | Head over to patreon.com/podrelationshit and start donating today!  Your donations will give you early access to the podcast,  behind-the-scenes interviews with our weekly guests, and merchandise.Rate Us | Go to your favorite podcast directory and give Relationsh!t a 5-Star rating, and a fantastic review!Follow Us | Instagram and Facebook: @podrelationshit

Some best bits while the boys are on break Most annoying thing someone can borrow Will's Reddit A silent argument Hot Takes New wiggles has Woody cracking up Who took the bins? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Suncorp Humble Pie Show: The panel unloads on Queensland's inept, mediocre decider performance. The New King of NSW: Nathan Cleary's untouchable 15-minute blitz and why the Immortal debate is officially over. Calling Out Gus Gould: Why Gould is dead wrong about "owning Origin". Mitchell Moses Silences the Panel: Readie pulls out the receipts on the hosts wanting Moses dropped. The Forward Monster Class: How Payne Haas, Mitch Barnett, and Addin Fonua-Blake completely destroyed the Queensland pack. Daley vs. Slater: Laurie Daley’s ultimate tactical vindication. The Bunker Robbery Debate: Breaking down the "very dodgy" Bradman Best try and the hidden camera angle home viewers didn't see.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

 Hi, Welcome back to the ValuationPodcast! I'm Melissa Gragg, and in this episode, I'm joined by Scott Zucker, an experienced commercial mediator, attorney, and author of The Mediation Minute. Together, we're exploring a side of dispute resolution that often gets overlooked—the psychology behind successful mediation.While legal arguments and financial facts are important, many business disputes are ultimately driven by emotions, communication, and the way people perceive fairness and control. Scott shares valuable insights from decades of litigation and mediation experience, explaining why preparation, self-determination, and understanding human behavior can make all the difference in resolving conflicts before they become costly courtroom battles.Whether you're dealing with a business partnership dispute, contract disagreement, valuation conflict, or simply want to understand how mediation creates better outcomes, this conversation offers practical strategies that every business owner, attorney, and financial professional can benefit from. Let's dive in.Key Takeaways:Psychology Often Drives Business Disputes More Than Legal ArgumentsSuccessful mediation requires understanding emotions, motivations, and human behavior—not just legal positions and financial numbers.Preparation Significantly Increases the Chances of SettlementEntering mediation with organized financial information, valuation data, evidence, and clearly defined objectives leads to more productive negotiations.Mediation Gives Parties Control Over the OutcomeUnlike litigation, mediation allows business owners to make their own decisions rather than leaving critical outcomes to a judge or jury.Experienced, Specialized Mediators Add Greater ValueComplex business disputes often benefit from mediators who understand specific industries, financial issues, business valuation, and commercial litigation.Success Isn't Always Immediate SettlementEven when a dispute isn't fully resolved in one session, mediation provides valuable information, clarifies priorities, improves communication, and often lays the groundwork for future resolution.Q&As from episode:1. What is the psychology of mediation in business disputes?The psychology of mediation focuses on understanding the emotions, motivations, communication styles, and decision-making processes that influence negotiations. Addressing these human factors often leads to more successful business dispute resolutions than relying solely on legal arguments.2. How should business owners prepare for commercial mediation?Business owners should prepare by organizing financial records, understanding business valuations, identifying key negotiation goals, gathering supporting evidence, and working with experienced legal and financial advisors before the mediation begins.3. Why is mediation often better than going to court for business disputes?Mediation allows business owners to maintain control over the outcome, protect confidentiality, reduce legal expenses, preserve business relationships, and reach customized solutions much faster than traditional litigation.4. Why is business valuation important during mediation?Business valuation provides an objective financial foundation for negotiations. Accurate valuation helps parties understand the true value of assets, ownership interests, or damages, making settlement discussions more productive and evidence-based.5. Does every mediation have to end with a settlement?No. A successful mediation doesn't always result in an immediate agreement. It can help clarify issues, improve communication, narrow disagreements, exchange valuable information, and create a stronger path toward resolving the dispute in future negotiations.Scott Zucker https://www.linkedin.com/in/scott-zucker-3643b712/ scott@wzlegal.com Melissa Gragghttps://www.valuationmediation.com/https://www.youtube.com/@BusinessValuationStL Support the show

In a new episode of Project NIL with Anthony Gargano & Daniel DiBerardinis discuss the Boston Celtics trading All-NBA Guard Jaylen Brown to the Philadelphia 76ers, they then make the argument for NIL as a positive in college football, give predictions for Team USA’s upcoming matchup in the Round of 16 against Belgium & MORE! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Full BeheCast episode: https://youtu.be/97qWu3hMiWQ Subscribe here: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/saeder/subscribe to access this episode & all exclusive Sae Bae Casts! Sae Bae Merch: https://sae-bae-shop.fourthwall.com

This week starts with a forgotten backpack... and somehow ends with one of the biggest conversations we've ever had about anger, entitlement, parenting, and why surviving today's world sometimes means swallowing your pride. We also get into how one shocking real-life murder of Anne's friend over a landlord dispute reminds us that not everyone is playing by the same rules anymore. Why expecting rational behavior from irrational people can be one of the biggest mistakes we make. And why winning an argument is becoming less and less worth it. Then we discuss, how growing up in Boston taught different rules about respect, consequences, and conflict. Why today's culture often rewards outrage over accountability. How **"paying the vig"—accepting a small loss to avoid a catastrophic one—** might be one of the smartest life strategies you'll ever adopt. Then the backpack. We talk about traveling light but always being prepared, surviving Hollywood, the increasing need to curb road rage, the Soup Nazi's surprisingly brilliant life lesson, raising kids who understand boundaries, why discipline can be one of the greatest forms of love, and why Kev is learning to say "no" to Athena. RGF Bonus: Joey Chestnut, Fourth of July traditions, squatter videos, Greek family cookouts, why Kev still carries a Mary Poppins backpack everywhere he goes, and why sometimes the bravest thing you can do... is quietly shuffle off to Buffalo. HEAL SQUAD SOCIALS IG: https://www.instagram.com/healsquad/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@healsquadxmaria HEAL SQUAD RESOURCES: Heal Squad Website:https://www.healsquad.com/ Heal Squad x Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/HealSquad/membership Maria Menounos Website: https://www.mariamenounos.com My Curated Macy's Page: Shop My Macy's Storefront EMR-Tek Red Light: https://emr-tek.com/discount/Maria30 for 30% off Airbnb: https://www.airbnb.com/host ABOUT MARIA MENOUNOS: Emmy Award-winning journalist, TV personality, actress, 2x NYT best-selling author, former pro-wrestler and brain tumor survivor, Maria Menounos' passion is to see others heal and to get better in all areas of life. ABOUT HEAL SQUAD x MARIA MENOUNOS: A daily digital talk-show that brings you the world's leading healers, experts, and celebrities to share groundbreaking secrets and tips to getting better in all areas of life. DISCLAIMER: This Podcast and all related content (published or distributed by or on behalf of Maria Menounos or http://Mariamenounos.com and http://healsquad.com) is for informational purposes only and may include information that is general in nature and that is not specific to you. Any information or opinions provided by guest experts or hosts featured within website or on Company's Podcast are their own; not those of Maria Menounos or the Company. Accordingly, Maria Menounos and the Company cannot be responsible for any results or consequences or actions you may take based on such information or opinions. This podcast is presented for exploratory purposes only. Published content is not intended to be used for preventing, diagnosing, or treating a specific illness. If you have, or suspect you may have, a health-care emergency, please contact a qualified health care professional for treatment.

No player in the NFL generates more heat, more takes, more arguments, and more split screens than Brock Purdy. System quarterback or legitimate star? Lucky beneficiary of Kyle Shanahan's genius or the reason the whole thing works? Every conversation about the 49ers eventually ends up here — and nobody ever walks away with the other side convinced. In this stream we're diving into why Purdy has become the most polarizing, most debated, most fascinating player in football right now and what that argument actually tells us about how we evaluate quarterbacks in the modern NFL.  Subscribe to DB+ for the Bay Area's most unfiltered sports coverage.  Sign up for PrizePicks with code: HMA and get $50 in lineups instantly when you play your first $5+ lineup! https://link.prizepicks.com/LME0/DAMON  Snapp AI: Use code "DamonBruceFree" when you sign up at: https://www.trysnapp.ai/  For advertising opportunities: contact@hogmedia.co Support the show by becoming a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcs13VXhiObJg6jGDw2xbZg/join  All Damon Bruce Plus content is available on your favorite podcast platform: https://pod.link/1681177856. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Tuesday, June 30, 2026; 8pm: Tonight, birthright citizenship hangs on by a thread while the court says even more dark money can buy our elections. Then, the ongoing debacle that is Trump's empty state fair. Plus, new razor thin margins in two key Senate races. Want more of Chris? Download and follow his podcast, “Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes podcast” wherever you get your podcasts.To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In This Hour:-- For the second time in a week the U.S. Supreme Court crushed a gun control law.  This time it was Hawaii's ban on concealed carry almost everywhere in the state, but it goes much father than that.  Kostas Moros, of the Second Amendment Foundation, reveals what others may not understand about this important move to restore constitutional rights. --  Why take a 100-year old rifle to Africa for a hunting trip?  Because it's fun!--  Tom takes a 15-year old boy shooting, and they ran through several pistols and rifles. Gun Talk 06.28.26 Hour 1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gun-talk--6185159/support.

What if the fastest way to end an argument with your child is to refuse to join it? When emotions are running high, most parents instinctively step into the conflict, hoping to teach a lesson, fix the behaviour, or set things straight. But what if that's exactly the wrong move? In this episode, Justin and Kylie explore why children often invite us into arguments, why it's so tempting to accept, and how learning to pause can transform family relationships. Discover the simple mindset shift that helps parents stay calm, avoid power struggles, and create space for better conversations. Sometimes the most powerful parenting response is not responding at all. KEY POINTS Why children often bait parents into arguments The hidden cost of reacting in the heat of the moment How "high emotions = low intelligence" affects family conflict The power of self-regulation during challenging interactions A simple phrase that can instantly de-escalate tension Why many arguments don't need to be revisited later How calm, delayed conversations lead to better outcomes Teaching children emotional regulation by modelling it yourself QUOTE OF THE EPISODE "You don't have to attend every argument you're invited to." RESOURCES MENTIONED The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen Covey The Happy Families approach to self-regulation and emotional coaching ACTION STEPS FOR PARENTS The next time your child invites you into an argument, pause before responding. Use a calm phrase such as, "We'll talk about this later." Keep your tone soft and reassuring, even when emotions are high. Create space for everyone to cool down before revisiting the issue. Ask yourself whether the problem still needs solving once emotions have settled. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Dr. Robin Collins joins me to discuss some of his new work on a new argument for Christianity. Dr. Collins: https://www.messiah.edu/dept-brps/our-faculty/profiles/collins-robin SOCIAL MEDIA: Twitter: https://twitter.com/AApologetics Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adherentapol... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adherentapo... TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@adherentapologetics

HOUR 4- The Wolves of Glendale, Buc-ees Argument Rages on and MORE full 1546 Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:39:00 +0000 p8j6ZtclKdmkVf7xzQ5f1rapBnNaDAgM society & culture Klein/Ally Show: The Podcast society & culture HOUR 4- The Wolves of Glendale, Buc-ees Argument Rages on and MORE Klein.Ally.Show on KROQ is more than just a "dynamic, irreverent morning radio show that mixes humor, pop culture, and unpredictable conversation with a heavy dose of realness." (but thanks for that quote anyway). Hosted by Klein, Ally, and a cast of weirdos (both on the team and from their audience), the show is known for its raw, offbeat style, offering a mix of sarcastic banter, candid interviews, and an unfiltered take on everything from culture to the chaos of everyday life. With a loyal, engaged fanbase and an addiction for pushing boundaries, the show delivers the perfect blend of humor and insight, all while keeping things fun, fresh, and sometimes a little bit illegal. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Society & Culture https://player.amperwavepodc

Dave Rubin of "The Rubin Report" talks about "The View's" Sara Haines' tense showdown with Sunny Hostin and Joy Behar over the danger of Democrats supporting far-left extremist candidates like Democrat Socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier, who won her election after being endorsed by Zohran Mamdani; CNN's Abby Phillip having her attempt to compare the extreme rhetoric of Democrat Socialists like Darializa Avila Chevalier to Donald Trump blow up in her face after Scott Jennings brought receipts of how dangerous these candidates really are; Donald Trump telling Fox News' Peter Doocy his reaction to Zohran Mamdani having more power over Democratic voters than Hakeem Jeffries; MSNOW's Ali Velshi asking Darializa Avila Chevalier if she is a communist; Squawk Box's Joe Kernen trying to get Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester to name one place where socialism has worked; Senator Tommy Tuberville revealing to Fox News' Martha MacCallum what really happened behind closed doors when Donald Trump backed away from signing the 21st Century Road to Housing Bill and ripped into Republicans for not getting the SAVE Act passed; and much more. Dave also hosts a special "ask me anything" question-and-answer session on a wide range of topics, answering questions from the Rubin Report Locals community. To celebrate Dave's birthday, we're giving you 50% OFF Copal from now through June 26. Don't miss this gift: https://drinkcopal.com/products/reposado WATCH the MEMBER-EXCLUSIVE segment of the show here: https://rubinreport.locals.com/ Check out the NEW RUBIN REPORT MERCH here: https://daverubin.store/ ---------- Today's Sponsors: Relief Factor - Relief Factor is an alternative to help your body's natural inflammatory response so you can keep doing the things you love. Try Relief Factor's 3-Week QuickStart—just $17.76.  Go to: https://www.relieffactor.com or call 800-4-RELIEF. Angel Studios - Choose entertainment that is focused on stories about perseverance and real human experiences. If you go premium, you'll get 2 free tickets to see Young Washington in theaters this Independence Day, and be part of making this film the #1 movie in America for our nation's 250th birthday. Go to: http://Angel.com/rubin Prolon- Prolon's Fasting Mimicking Diet is a revolutionary, plant-based nutrition program that nourishes the body while keeping it in a fasting state. Prolon is offering 15% off their 5-day nutrition program for your post-holiday glow-up. Go to: http://ProlonLife.com/DAVE Shopify - Turn your big business idea into money with Shopify on your side. Go to Shopify and sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial and start selling today at Go to: http://shopify.com/rubin Polymarket -Go to http://polymarket.com to trade on the outcomes of live events from politics, pop culture, to sports and more!

Abundance liberals want a politics focused on delivering more homes, energy projects, infrastructure, and innovation, and will even countenance deregulation to achieve it. Cato's Ryan Bourne talks to Ilya Somin and Jeremiah Johnson about whether libertarians should ally with this movement—or whether shared ground on housing, permitting, trade, and immigration masks irreconcilable disagreements over the role and size of government. Ilya Somin, "Two Cheers for Abundance Liberalism," The Volokh Conspiracy, April 23, 2026.Matt Yglesias, "What Libertarians Get Wrong About Freedom," The Argument, May 20, 2026.Ilya Somin, "Matt Yglesias on Libertarianism, Abundance Liberalism, and a Possible Alliance Between the Two," The Volokh Conspiracy, May 20, 2026.David Friedman, "Libertarians and Abundance Liberals," David Friedman's Substack, May 28, 2026.Ryan Bourne, "One and a Half Cheers for Supply-Side Progressivism," The War on Prices, September 16, 2022. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of For The Dads with Former NFL Linebacker Will Compton, hosts Will and Sherm congratulate friend of the show Nick on his recent news, joke with Will about his odds to make no reading mistakes about breakdown the discussion that got Sherm to go to Atlanta! — all while keeping the episode fun, fresh and of course, under an hour. The episode kicks off with Sherm having Dad Brain before diving into some hilarious topics, including: Will’s inlaws let him down! Sherm is making it to the Baylor game Chef stands his ground against an all out attack Other highlights include: Tell the story of Bryan Clark’s recovery A hard hitting lesson of the week

Brian Geltzeiler joins to weigh in on a possible Evan Mobley for Jaylen Brown swap and says he'd make the deal as Boston but isn't convinced as Cleveland, arguing Mobley's offensive ceiling has been capped by usage rather than talent. The segment derails into a heated argument when Anthony pushes back on Geltzeiler calling James Harden's Eastern Conference Finals performance "humiliating," comparing it unfavorably to Victor Wembanyama, and Geltzeiler abruptly threatens to hang up over the disrespect before the call actually drops. After patching things up, Geltzeiler argues the Cavs have a roster structure problem, with Mobley miscast next to Jarrett Allen instead of playing center outright, and says running the same group back next year guarantees the same result. He closes things out on a lighter note, confirming AJ Dybantsa was the right pick at number one in last night's draft.

Malthusian Logic and the "Check" of Hunger. Guest: Patrick Scanlan. Scanlan discusses the influence of economist Thomas Robert Malthus on Victorian policy, noting his argument that population growth would inevitably outstrip food production. Malthus viewed famine as nature's "last most dreadful resource" to restore balance. For Victorian policymakers, this logic justified a refusal to provide direct aid to the poor, fearing it would encourage "imprudent" reproduction and laziness. They believed that without the "check" of hunger, the Irish would refuse to work for low wages. Malthus specifically viewed the potato as "too generous" because it allowed the poor to survive with minimal labor, bypassing the "civilizational checks" on population seen in other societies. Consequently, many British officials viewed the famine as an inevitable consequence of Irish behavior and population growth. This ideological framework heavily influenced the British Empire's preoccupation with maintaining a "work ethic" even amidst mass starvation. 51868

Get 40% off select Lola Blankets products at https://lolablankets.com with code LAWNERD at checkout. #ad Get 40% off your first Hungryroot box plus a free item in every box for life at https://hungryroot.com/LAWNERD with code LAWNERD. This episode discusses several upcoming criminal and civil court dates, including a murder case for Alex Murdaugh set for June 29, 2026, and his civil suit against Becky Hill. Legal proceedings regarding the Karen Read case are active on both the civil and criminal dockets. A wrongful death hearing continued on June 22, 2026, to determine a deposition date for Colin Albert, who must be produced before the August discovery deadline. There's also highlights developments in cases involving D4VD, whose preliminary hearing was rescheduled for July 21, 2026, and "Reckless Ben," who faces multiple upcoming hearings for civil RICO, stalking, and trespassing charges. RESOURCES Alex Murdaugh Assigned a Judge - https://youtu.be/ojT2fNd11Lk Alex Murdaugh Financial Crimes Plea - https://youtu.be/_TF3LcVMiKo Reckless Ben Lawsuit Stream - https://youtu.be/MPD8UXEqMgg Bryan Kohberger Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKASBczV3CsUx-t5oRAK0ca Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Progressives are highly critical of America, and for good reason. But we are losing more than problematic idols and ideals when we abandon patriotism. Jerusalem Demsas, founder and editor of “The Argument,” argues that if we're going to save America, we'll have to start loving it first.  She joins Offline to explain how liberals have ceded patriotism to the right, why No Kings is starting to fix this, and how to talk about our country's issues without undermining hope that America still holds promise.For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast, episode title, and episode date.

1.

“What was the best argument against Catholicism?” This question leads to a discussion on the challenges faced by Catholics, including how to reconcile difficult moments in Church history, such as the Inquisition, and the role of priests in absolution. Additionally, the conversation touches on maintaining faith during tough times, providing a well-rounded exploration of these important topics. Join the Catholic Answers Live Club Newsletter Invite our apologists to speak at your parish! Visit Catholicanswersspeakers.com Questions Covered: 17:10 – What did you think was the best argument against Catholicism when you were protestant? 22:45 – How do we justify bad things in Church history like the inquisition and bad things that popes did? 33:55 – Why can't priests absolve themselves? 36:25 – In light of Mark 11:24, how can I maintain faith when things are hard?