Podcasts about Argument

Woman finds maggots in her croissant — and cafe gives ‘dismissive' apology - Woman finds maggots in her croissant — and cafe gives 'dismissive' apology | New York PostWinning ticket for $980 million jackpot sold in Georgia, Mega Millions - Winning ticket for $980 million jackpot sold in Georgia, Mega Millions saysHoliday Tipping Guide 2025: Who to Tip, How Much, and What to Give - Holiday Tipping Guide 2025: Who to Tip, How Much, and What to GiveLast US pennies could fetch up to $5 million after mint shuts down production - Last US pennies could fetch up to $5M after mint shuts down production | New York PostMan Discovers Treasure Worth More Than $800K While Digging a Swimming Pool in His Yard. What Happens Next Is Shocking - Man Discovers Gold Worth $800K While Digging a Swimming Pool in His YardTrouble in Toyland 2025: A.I. bots and toxics present hidden dangers - Trouble in Toyland 2025: A.I. bots and toxics present hidden dangersThe Avett Brothers, Mike Patton Team For First Album - The Avett Brothers, Mike Patton Team For First Album - SPINThe foods that make you smell more attractive - The foods that make you smell more attractiveRussian honeypot reveals how Putin's sex spies seduce Silicon Valley nerds to learn secrets - Exclusive | Russian honeypot reveals how Putin's sex spies seduce Silicon Valley nerds | New York PostSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Scripture Reading: Mark 2:13-17, I. The Object of the Call of Jesus A. The Description of the Object B. The Lesson from the ObjectII. The Nature of the Call of Jesus A. An Authoritative Call B. An Effectual Call C. A Radical CallIII. The Confrontation concerning the Call of Jesus A. The Source of the Confrontation B. The Argument in the Confrontation C. The Response to the ConfrontationRev. Greg Lubbers

In this free-for-all-Friday Trent sits down with Protestant Sean McDowell to compare their surveys on the arguments for the existence of God.

Things got tense between Joe Giglio of the 94 WIP Midday Show and a caller over the current AJ Brown situation. Giglio has completely had enough of Brown's semantics, saying that he constantly talks about himself and only himself. Dominating his matchup is the only thing that matters to Brown. Congratulations are in order for a WIP host as he achieves an accomplishment on-air. Also, listen for this week's segment of Guess the Takes, as Joe, Hugh, and Kyle try to predict what the NFL headlines will be after this weekend's slate of games.

Don't miss Eubank Jr vs Benn 2, November 15th, only on DAZN. Click here to buy the PPV and get a 7-day free trial: https://www.dazn.com/ifltv Eddie Hearn erupts in a heated exchange with Gareth A. Davies after the journalist's comments about a potential Anthony Joshua vs Jake Paul fight.

Jeff Fox and Brooke Dillman are here and they have a new disagreement, one that results in us calling a restaurant for intel. Daniel is full of Alf factoids and I share the old commercial that's inspiring me lately. We learn about Rula Lenska and I need to know about the guy Jeff and Brooke absolutely don't want to see while high. Plus we did a round of JMOE, HGFY and Podcast Pals Product Picks. Get yourself some new ARIYNBF merch here: https://alison-rosen-shop.fourthwall.com/ Subscribe to my Substack: http://alisonrosen.substack.com Podcast Palz Product Picks: https://www.amazon.com/shop/alisonrosen/list/2CS1QRYTRP6ER?ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_aipsflist_aipsfalisonrosen_0K0AJFYP84PF1Z61QW2H Products I Use/Recommend/Love: http://amazon.com/shop/alisonrosen Check us out on Patreon: http://patreon.com/alisonrosen   This episode is brought to you by RULA. Buy Alison's Fifth Anniversary Edition Book (with new material): Tropical Attire Encouraged (and Other Phrases That Scare Me) https://amzn.to/2JuOqcd You probably need to buy the HGFY ringtone! https://www.alisonrosen.com/store/ Try Amazon Prime Free 30 Day Trial

November 12th, 2025 Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and X Listen to past episodes on The Ticket’s Website And follow The Ticket Top 10 on Apple, Spotify or Amazon MusicSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The U.S. government has reopened after the longest shutdown in American history. Futures still slid ahead of the opening bell. Kevin Hincks says some of the weakness may come from the lack of economic data markets will receive, signaled by the White House stating no October CPI is coming. It also complicates the Fed's interest rate picture due to the FOMC's data dependence.======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day. Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/ About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about

If your students stare blankly at rubrics or ignore them altogether, this episode is for you. In this episode of Two Middle School ELA Teachers, Shannon shares a fun, low-stakes, and unforgettable way to introduce students to what a rubric really is—by blowing bubbles. You'll hear how she uses a bubble-blowing challenge to teach the two essential parts of a rubric (criteria and levels) and how that experience gives students the confidence to understand and use the SC READY argumentative writing rubric. In this episode, you'll learn: How to set up the bubblegum rubric activity  How to transition into the real writing rubric using student-friendly language How to run a fishbowl scoring activity that helps students internalize rubric expectations Why rubrics give students power—and how to make that message stick Grab our free bubble gum rubric here! 

Raphael Rohner:Es geht um Geld, um richtig, richtig viel Geld. Eigentlich müsste man meinen, dass jeder und jede in der Schweiz früher oder später über Nacht ein paar hundert Millionen Franken mehr auf seinem Konto hat und dann in Saus und Braus leben könnte. Zumindest wenn wir den Gegnerinnen und Gegnern der neuen Juso-Initiative zuhören, dann bekommt man das Gefühl, dass viele Leute von dieser neuen Initiative betroffen sind. Das ist aber nicht so. Nur wenige Leute haben überhaupt so viel Geld, dass sie zur Kasse beten würden. Ein durchaus emotionales Thema, wie immer, wenn es ums Geld geht. Ihr hört hinter der Schlagzeile diesen Podcast von CH Media. Am Mikrofon Raphael Rohner. Bei mir im Studio ist Politchefin von CH Media Doris Kleck. Worum geht es bei dieser Initiative genau? Doris Kleck:Die Juso will mit ihrer Initiative, dass grosse Erbschaften bestürzt werden. Genau geht es um Erbschaften ab 50 Mio. Franken. Für diese soll ein Steuersatz von 50% gelten. Ich kann ein Beispiel machen. Wenn du 60 Mio. Franken erbst, dann ist das 10 Mio. über einem Freibetrag. Dann müsstest du 50% auf 10 Mio. zahlen. Das heisst, du würdest eine Erbschaftsteuer von 5 Mio. entrichten müssen. Findest du nicht so viel? Wenn sie 1 Mio. sind, dann musst du die Hälfte von 950 Mio. steuern. Dann sind wir bei 475 Mio. Franken. Das ist der eine Teil. Die Juso will eine nationale Erbschaftsteuer-Initiative einführen. Bis jetzt haben wir kantonale Erbschaftsteuern. Die sind kantonal geregelt. Das Zweite ist, weil die Juso sagt, sie will, dass die Einnahmen für die Bekämpfung der Klimakrise und den besseren Klimaschutz verwendet werden. Die zusätzlichen Einnahmen wären zweckbund. Das sind die zwei Ziele der Initiative. Darum heisst sie auch «Initiative für eine Zukunft». Raphael Rohner:«Initiative für eine Zukunft». Das ist spannend. Wie viele Leute werden betroffen? Du hast gesagt, wenn ich jetzt so viel erbe, was wahrscheinlich nicht passieren würde, wirst du so viel Geld erben? Doris Kleck:Nein, ich werde auch nicht so viel Geld erben. Ich bin nicht direkt betroffen von dieser Initiative. Laut Steuerverwaltung sind 2500 Personen direkt betroffen. In der Schweiz leben 2500 Personen mit einem Vermögen von über 50 Mio. Franken. Aber diese Initiative wird indirekte Effekte haben. Das ist ein grosser Streitpunkt zwischen Befürworter und Gegner. Der Bund geht davon aus, dass ein grosser Teil der «Superreichen», wie die Juso sagt, wegziehen würde. Damit würden andere Einnahmen fehlen. Die Supervermögen zahlen Einkommensteuern und heute schon Vermögensteuern. Raphael Rohner:Ist es nicht so, dass die «Superreichen» zum Teil auch pauschal besteuert werden und keine grosse Wertschöpfung auf unsere Gesellschaft haben? Doris Kleck:Das ist etwas anderes. Nicht alle «Superreichen» werden pauschal besteuert. Vor allem nicht die Schweizer. Peter Spuler wird nicht pauschal besteuert in der Schweiz. Auch Willi Michel nicht. Pauschal besteuert werden können nur Ausländer. Die haben keinen Job oder Arbeitseinkommen mehr in der Schweiz. Darum werden sie nach Aufwand besteuert. Das ist etwas, was die Juso kritisiert. Die pauschal Besteuerten sind superreich und haben ein Vermögen auf der ganzen Welt. Das hat man bei den Datengrundlagen nicht berücksichtigt, dass es die pauschal Besteuerten auch gibt. Das Problem ist, dass die Kantone keinen Zugriff auf die Daten haben. Die werden nach Aufwand besteuert. Was man davon ausgehen kann, die pauschal Besteuerten kommen in die Schweiz, um Steuern zu sparen. Das sind extrem mobile Personen. Die haben drei Wohnsitze. Einen in Italien, einen in Dubai, einen irgendwo. Das sind auch Leute, die zum Steueroptimieren kommen. Das sind auch die ersten, die weg sind. Raphael Rohner:Aber es sind wahrscheinlich auch nicht die, die etwas vererben. Doris Kleck:Heute ist es in der Schweiz bei den kantonalen Erbschaftssteuern, dass du als Erbe bezahlst. Bei dieser Initiative wäre es so, dass der Erblasser, der besteuert wird, auf einem Nachlass erhoben wird. Das stimmt. Wenn ein pauschal Besteuerter mit einem Vermögen von 2 Mrd. in der Schweiz sterben würde, ist die Vorstellung, dass sein Nachlass, sein Vermögen von den 2 Mrd. in der Schweiz besteuert wird. Auch wenn seine Erben auf der ganzen Welt verteilt werden. Das ist ein anderer Mechanismus, wie die Erbschaftssteuer berechnet wird. Raphael Rohner:Wie gefährlich ist die Initiative wirklich? Doris Kleck:Die Gegner dieser Initiative sagen, sie treffe v.a. Unternehmer. Unternehmer haben ihr Vermögen. Das liegt nicht einfach auf dem Bankkonto. Das haben sie investiert in ein Unternehmen, in Anlagen, das ist Betriebsvermögen. Sie sagen, wenn wir die Erbschaftssteuer entrichten müssten, müssten wir die Unternehmen verkaufen, damit die Erbschaftssteuer bezahlt werden könnte. Das ist das eine. Wieso sich v.a. die in der Schweiz verankerten Unternehmen wehren, ich weiss nicht, vor einem Jahr oder im Sommer sagte Peter Spuler, der Bahnunternehmer aus Thurgau, er überlege sich schon wegzuziehen wegen dieser Initiative. Diese Initiative löste bei vielen reichen Leuten Nervosität aus. Das ist das eine. Das andere ist, wieso wir indirekt von diesen Unternehmen betroffen wären, wenn diese superreichen weggehen und Bund und Kantone andere Einnahmen fehlen. Die Schweiz hat z.B. eine recht hohe Vermögensteuer. Ich glaube, 1% der top Haushalte, der reichsten Haushalte, zahlen auf Vermögensteuer in der Schweiz. Sie bringt ca. 9 Mrd. Fr. ein. Das ist eine Steuer, die die Kantone sehr gerne haben, weil sie sehr konstant und gut berechenbar ist. 1% der vermögendsten Haushalte in der Schweiz zahlen 51% der Vermögensteuer. Die 5% der reichsten Haushalte zahlen sogar 87% der Vermögensteuer. Raphael Rohner:Also ein Haufen Geld, das am Schluss fehlen könnte. Doris Kleck:Genau. Die Schweiz hat eine hohe Progression bei den Einkommen. Raphael Rohner:Was heisst Progression? Doris Kleck:Je reicher du bist, desto grösser ist der Anteil des Einkommens, den du steuern zahlen musst. Je reicher, desto mehr beteiligst du dich an der Finanzierung des öffentlichen Lebens. Die Angst der Gegner ist auch, dass ein Teilhalt dieser Einnahmen wegfallen würde. Es gibt konservative Schätzungen des Bundes. Sie gehen davon aus, dass der Schweiz 1,3 bis 1,7 Mrd. Fr. entgehen würde, wenn diese Initiative angenommen wird. Die Frage ist, wie die Finanzierungslücke entdeckt wird, die entsteht. Es ist befürchtet, dass wir als Mittelstand geschröpft werden, wenn die Reichen weggehen. Die JUSO sagt, das sei alles Angstmacherei. Es ist doch ganz einfach. Je höher die Steuern sind, desto höher sind die Einnahmen. Raphael Rohner:Aber die JUSO sagt, dass umso mehr solche Steuern erhoben werden, umso mehr Geld reinkommt. Sie haben ja auch die Zahlen. Das zeigt mir auch der Rundschau, der heftig diskutiert wurde. Gibt es nicht auch mehr Geld, wenn man mehr Steuern einzieht? Doris Kleck:Bei den Steuern spricht man von Elastizität. Dieses Konzept gibt es auch in anderen Bereichen der Ökonomie. Du kannst die Steuern bis zu einem gewissen Grad erhöhen. Dann gibt es vielleicht höhere Einnahmen. Aber irgendwann kommt der Effekt, dass die Leute ihr Verhalten anpassen. Wenn du einen Steuersatz von 50 % hast, kannst du davon ausgehen, dass sie reichen. Sie haben auch die Mittel dazu, dass sie ihr Verhalten anpassen. Du kannst die Leute ja nicht in der Schweiz physisch festhalten. Die JUSO sagt, dass der Bundesrat schauen kann, dass die Steuern nicht umgehen. Aber du kannst diesen Leuten nicht den Pass wegnehmen und sagen, sie dürften nicht auswandern. Das geht einfach nicht. Wir haben keine Kapitalkontrolle. Auch wenn jemand von diesen Reichen auswandert, kann es sein, dass er wegen etwas anderem geht, weil er heiratet oder den Guggen war. Und gar nicht wegen dieser Erbschaftssteuer. Es ist extrem schwierig, das zu verhindern. Der Bund hat diese Elastizität auch berechnen lassen. Marius Brühlhardt, der Ökonom aus Lausanne, kennt sich wahrscheinlich am besten in der Schweiz mit den Erbschaftssteuern aus. Er ist ein Befürworter einer moderaten Erbschaftssteuer. Aber er kam auch zum Schluss, dass viele ihr Verhalten anpassen würden und weggehen würden. Ich würde sagen, das ist ein unverdächtiger Kronzeuge auf der Seite des Bundes. Raphael Rohner:Aber wie schlimm wäre es, wenn die reichen Leute gehen würden? Da würden sie viel Geld fehlen. Andererseits kommen sie vielleicht auch mehr Leute her, weil sie finden, es sei ein faires System. Doris Kleck:Boah, das glaube ich nicht. Sie könnten ja schon heute kommen und sagen, die Vermögenssteuer ist weltweit nicht verbreitet. Wenn jemand gerne Steuern zahlen will, ist es nicht so, dass die Schweiz die Reichen überhaupt nicht hart anlangt oder ihnen das Geld nicht nimmt. Die Schweiz hat auch hohe Steuern für vermögende Personen. Und wenn jemand findet, er würde gerne Vermögenssteuer zahlen, ist er da herzlich willkommen. Raphael Rohner:Fassen wir nochmals schnell zusammen. Die JUSO verlangt bei ihrer neuen Initiative, dass bei Erbschaften über 50 Mio. Fr. die Hälfte des Betrags an Bund geht. Und das Geld wird nicht für etwas ausgehen wie für Bildung. Nein, das Geld ist zweckgebunden und soll in den Klimaschutz fliessen. Schnell einen Blick auf die Befürworter. Welche Argumente haben sie? Haben sie auch gute Argumente für diese Initiative? Wie siehst du das? Doris Kleck:Sie sagen, die Reichen seien diejenigen, die unser Klima, unsere Umwelt kaputt machen. Und die sollen jetzt auch zahlen. Sie verbinden die Vermögensungleichheiten, die es gibt, die auch zunimmt, auch in der Schweiz. Das ist etwas, das sie anprangern. Und das Zweite ist die Klimakrise und der ganze Klimawandel. Und sie verbinden diese zwei Elemente. Sie sagen, die Reichen mit ihren Yachten und Privatschätzen verursachen mehr CO2-Emissionen. Und darum sollen sie auch für den Klimaschutz aufkommen. Das ist ihr Argument. Es ist tatsächlich so, wenn du reich bist, kannst du mehr konsumieren. Raphael Rohner:Aber es ist schon etwas so. Die reichen Leute mit ihren Yachten sorgen einfach auch beweisenermassen dafür, für eine grössere Umweltbelastung, für eine grössere Umweltzerstörung und für einen grösseren CO2-Ausstoss. Es ist ja eigentlich so. Dazu gibt es Fakten. Doris Kleck:Ja gut, es gibt verschiedene Studien. Ich gebe dir grundsätzlich recht. Je reicher du bist, desto mehr konsumierst du, fliegst du, hast du einen grösseren CO2-Ausstoss. Was aber interessant ist, die reichen Leute für den Franken, den sie konsumieren, ist der grösste Teil. Sie konsumieren nachhaltiger, als wahrscheinlich du und ich oder irgendjemand, der wenig Geld hat. Weil sie sich auch mehr leisten können. Sie gehen dann wahrscheinlich in den Naturwiegenposten oder das Biofleisch zum Beispiel zum Nahrungsmittel nehmen. Oder sie kaufen nachhaltiger produzierte Kleider, weil sie einfach teurer sind. Raphael Rohner:Aber dafür dreimal im Jahr neue Kleider? Doris Kleck:Das ist die Frage. Es gibt auch viele, die nicht so viel Geld haben, die dreimal im Jahr neue Kleider kaufen. Einfach billige Produkte aus China, die überhaupt nicht nachhaltig sind. Ich finde, ich warne einfach davon, zum... Ich meine, es ist auch extrem polemisch. Die haben einfach alle Yachts und Yachten und Privatjet und unbestritten, wenn man mehr Geld hat, konsumiert man mehr, aber man konsumiert vielleicht auch nachhaltiger. Das ist das eine. Und was mich etwas stört, ist, der Bund gibt 2 Mrd. pro Jahr für Klimaschutzmassnahmen aus. Zum Beispiel, wenn du dein Haus sanieren möchtest oder deine Höhenheizung ersetzen möchtest, kannst du dir Subventionen abholen. Es passiert einiges in diesem Bereich. Jetzt kann man sagen, 2 Mrd. ist uns zu wenig. Aber diese 2 Mrd. kommen aus dem Haushalt. Es sind Steuereinnahmen, die man dafür braucht. Und wer zahlt mehr Steuern? Das sind wieder die Reichen und die Vermögenden. Sie beteiligen sich heute überproportional an diesen Ausgaben für den Klimaschutz. Das passiert schon. Raphael Rohner:Braucht diese Initiative deiner Meinung nach gar nicht? Doris Kleck:Ich finde, diese Initiative hat Nebeneffekte, die nicht cool sind, die nicht gut sind. Ich finde, man sollte Unternehmertum in der Schweiz nicht anbürgen. Ich finde, die Vorstellungen der Juso sind einfach. Sie haben das Gefühl, wenn man die Unternehmen nichts für den Klimaschutz macht. Ich glaube, der Staat muss molenkend eingreifen und Klimaschutzmassnahmen fördern. Aber die Juso stellt alles am Pranger, wie wenn jedes Unternehmen und jeder Unternehmer extrem klimaschädigend wäre. Dass der Staat das besser könnte, das glaube ich nicht. Ich meine nur das Weltbild, das sie haben. Es schwirren auch Umsetzungsmassnahmen herum. Es gibt ein Papier der SP-Fraktion oder der Fraktion Spitze, das sagt, wir wollen gar nicht Familienunternehmen zerstören. Wir können das anders machen. Sie haben einen Vorschlag, dass sie die Unternehmen-Aktien dem Staat abgeben. Raphael Rohner:Das wäre eine Enteignung. Doris Kleck:Ja, bei aller Liebe, das ist wie Planwirtschaft pur. Dass der Staat, vielleicht ist das Geld besser, wenn das Geld im Unternehmen bleibt und das Unternehmen sich klimafreundlich verhält. Dort die Transformation investieren. Ich weiss nicht, ob du die Rundschau geschaut hast. Dort wurde die Juso-Präsidentin Hostetmana gefragt, wie sie sich die neue Wirtschaft vorstellt. Die Juso will nicht nur den Klimawandel bekämpfen, sondern sie will einen Totalumbau der Wirtschaft. Raphael Rohner:Das habe ich gesehen. Doris Kleck:Dann sagt sie, sie wollen weg vom Turbo-Kapitalismus, und wir wollen eine nachhaltigere Wirtschaft. Zum Beispiel müssen nachhaltige Sektoren wie der Care-Sektor massiv ausgebaut werden. Care-Arbeit ist wahrscheinlich die Kita-Betreuer und die ganze Pflege. Unsere Wirtschaft oder unsere Gesellschaft kann nicht bestehen, indem wir einfach mehr Leute... Ich sage nicht, dass der Care-Sektor nicht wichtig ist, aber wir können ja nicht die Leute einfach für den Care-Sektor ausbilden. Das kann auch nicht unsere Wirtschaft sein. Wir müssen ja Wertschöpfung erwirtschaften. Es ist auch ein komisches Bild, dass wenn ein paar Leute reicher werden, dass alle anderen ärmer werden. Sie machen einfach Milchbüchelrechnungen, die nicht stimmen. Sie haben wirklich ein komisches Bild unserer Wirtschaft. Ich glaube, das ist so... Ja... Das finde ich schwierig an dieser Initiative. Raphael Rohner:Was hättest du anders formuliert, wenn du diese Initiative lanciert hättest? Doris Kleck:Ich meine, die Diskussion über die Erbschaft steuert sich immer wieder. Die Kantone hatten früher noch höhere Erbschaftssteuern. Respektive sie haben früher noch Kinder noch bezahlen lassen. Viele Kantone sind davon weggekommen. Ich glaube ausser Kanton Waadt und Kanton Jura. Es kann funktionieren mit einer Erbschaftssteuer. Unsere Wirtschaft bricht nicht zusammen, aber dann muss es ein sehr moderater Satz sein. 50% ist wirklich einfach... Ja, das ist wirklich einfach so viel. Das funktioniert so nicht. Wenn man eine solche Steuer erhebt, gibt es viele negative Effekte. Die Initiative kann uns dazu bewegen, dass wir uns überlegen, wie unser Steuersystem aussehen würde, wenn wir es auf der grünen Wiese bauen würden. Raphael Rohner:Also komplett neu. Doris Kleck:Komplett neu. Dann kann man sich schon überlegen, wie es nicht sein würde, eine moderate Erbschaftsteuer zu haben. Aber dann muss man sich auch überlegen, wie sich das mit unserer Vermögenssteuer vertreibt. Vermögenssteuer ist von den Unternehmern auch nicht geliebt, weil es an der Substanz zerrt. Könnte man eine neue Mischform machen, eine moderate Erbschaftsteuer, um die Vermögenssteuer zu senken? Man könnte sich auch überlegen, ob es sinnvoll ist, immer nur unsere Mehrwertsteuer zu erhöhen. Raphael Rohner:Das wäre ein Ansatz. Doris Kleck:Da bin ich auch nicht sicher. Das Problem ist einfach, es gibt verschiedene Argumente für und gegen jede Steuer. Bei den Vermögenssteuern ist es so, dass die Kantone es sehr gerne haben, weil sie konstant fliessen. Bei den Erbschaften wird es viel volatiler, weil du nicht weisst, wenn in deinem Kanton eine hohe Erbschaft anfällt. So gibt es immer dafür und dann wieder. Ich finde es eine tolle, theoretische Überlegungsschiebung, ein neues Steuersystem zu schaffen. Aber wir sind nicht an diesem Punkt. Raphael Rohner:Wir sind an dem Punkt, wo es darum geht, ob wir die Juso-Initiative annehmen oder ablehnen. Danke für das Gespräch. Doris Kleck:Danke für die Einladung. Tschüss. 

11-12-25 - Emailer Asks If We Get Credit For Out Of State App Listeners - Golden State Killer Was ID'd By His Freakishly Small Junk As Brady UTurns The Show With His Oral Rape Argument - Loving The New Vince Gilligan Show Pluribus As We Discuss Hive MindSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Turns out chickens aren't working as hard as we thought. Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Every few years, conversations about education in the U.S. circle back to the same refrain: Why can't we be more like Finland?In this episode, I sit down with Dr. Chrishawn Finister from Your Joy Psychological, PLLC to unpack this comparison.We dig into the nuanced relationship between educational eligibility and clinical diagnosis, which often overlap but aren't interchangeable. From there, we widen the lens to explore the broader systems-level challenges that shape how students are identified, supported, and served.Some key themes we discuss:✅ Orthographic density and literacy: Why differences in written language systems matter when comparing reading outcomes across countries.✅ Population homogeneity and “education tracks”: When we look at instructional outcomes data, the students included in the education system and the numbers matter. Are the same individuals “counting” when we compare results across countries? ✅ Teacher pay and professional identity: What Finland's investment in teacher preparation and salary looks like compared to the U.S. (spoiler alert: Dr. Finister and I both think the US should be more like Finland on this one). ✅ Cultural perceptions of medicine vs. education: Why recommendations from evaluations are perceived differently depending on the setting and who is making decisions about services.✅ Housing instability and socioeconomic factors: We're educating students with complex needs in the US who have varying experiences outside of school. With this in mind, has the education system made more progress than what the media is saying? Rather than looking for a one-size-fits-all solution, we highlight why U.S. educators, policymakers, and clinicians need to understand the challenges and opportunities when designing systems of support.If you've ever wondered where the lines between clinical diagnosis and educational eligibility blur, this conversation will give you a grounded perspective.Dr. Chrishawn Finister is an Independent Practicing Licensed Psychological Associate and a Licensed Specialist in School Psychology, possessing over a decade of experience in the role of School Psychologist. Recognized as a Nationally Certified School Psychologist, she is committed to utilizing diagnostically sound assessments to identify learning barriers and implementing research-based interventions to amend challenging behaviors effectively. Dr. Finister is an advocate of culturally competent practices and is dedicated to training future practitioners in the field. She received her foundational training in psychological pedagogy and assessments at Texas Woman's University, where she completed her Master's degree in 2010. While working in a prominent North Texas public school district, she advanced her education by earning a Doctoral degree in Educational Leadership and Policy from the University of Texas at Arlington in 2019. Her contributions to the field extend to academia, where she has served as a guest lecturer at the College of Education at Texas Christian University.Places to connect with Dr. Finister:Her private practice, Your Joy Psychological, PLLCWebsite: https://yourjoypsych.com/Business Instagram: @yourjoypsychHer NonProfit, Texas Psychological Hive: https://thetexaspsychhive.org/Non-profit Instagram: @texaxpsychhiveAdditional Resources Mentioned in this episode:Steven Pinker: https://stevenpinker.com/Mark Manson: https://markmanson.net/Dr. Tim Shanahan: https://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/In this episode, I mention Language Therapy Advance Foundations, my program that gives SLPs and other service providers a system for language therapy. You can learn more about the program here: https://drkarenspeech.com/languagetherapy/ We're thrilled to be sponsored by IXL. IXL's comprehensive teaching and learning platform for math, language arts, science, and social studies is accelerating achievement in 95 of the top 100 U.S. school districts. Loved by teachers and backed by independent research from Johns Hopkins University, IXL can help you do the following and more:Simplify and streamline technologySave teachers' timeReliably meet Tier 1 standardsImprove student performance on state assessments

11-12-25 - Emailer Asks If We Get Credit For Out Of State App Listeners - Golden State Killer Was ID'd By His Freakishly Small Junk As Brady UTurns The Show With His Oral Rape Argument - Loving The New Vince Gilligan Show Pluribus As We Discuss Hive MindSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Can you really end ANY argument with ANY person, in 90 seconds — even with a killer..?Doug Noll says yes. And he has the prison-tested, neuroscience-backed method to prove it.In this episode of Journey to Legacy, we sit down with Doug Noll, a former trial lawyer turned international peacemaker, to explore the emotional skills that dissolve conflict, build unbreakable trust, and transform lives.Doug has trained over 100,000 people, from inmates in maximum-security prisons to analysts in Congress. His 3-step method can instantly calm conflict by doing one surprising thing: listening to emotions, not words.Whether you're a leader, coach, parent, or partner, this will change the way you communicate forever.

Ara, the sassy AI co-host, spars with the psychologist host on human error, workplace rest, and why zero-error dreams are a myth. Fun, fiery and full of truth bombs. To learn more, visit:https://humanerrorsolutions.com/Listen to more episodes on Mission Matters:https://missionmatters.com/author/ginette-collazo/

Turns out chickens aren't working as hard as we thought. Chicago’s best morning radio show now has a podcast! Don’t forget to rate, review, and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts and remember that the conversation always lives on the Q101 Facebook page. Brian & Kenzie are live every morning from 6a-10a on Q101. Subscribe to our channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/@Q101 Like Q101 on Facebook HERE: https://www.facebook.com/q101chicago Follow Q101 on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/Q101Chicago Follow Q101 on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/q101chicago/?hl=en Follow Q101 on TikTok HERE: https://www.tiktok.com/@q101chicago?lang=enSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

November 11th, 2025 - We welcome back Steve Cunningham of Sensus Fidelium to talk the banning of altar rails in the Diocese of Charlotte. Plus: monogamy vs. polygamy. TheStationOfTheCross.com/ACT  

In this episode of 5 Fresh Tips, therapist and life coach Laura Fink, a trusted Fresh Starts Expert, shares evidence-based communication strategies to help listeners navigate heated arguments with their spouse or partner—without making things worse. Drawing on her background in emotional regulation and relationship dynamics, Laura breaks down how to pause before reacting, identify emotional triggers, and reframe defensive language to create space for understanding. Her clear and practical insights give listeners the tools to transform conflict into connection and self-awareness.Listeners will learn how to regulate their nervous systems during conflict, a crucial skill for emotional resilience and healthy communication—especially during high-stress moments like divorce recovery or co-parenting. Laura explains how physical cues like a raised voice or clenched jaw can signal fight-or-flight activation, and offers real-world grounding techniques to restore calm. She also emphasizes that “taking space is not avoidance,” but rather a form of self-respect and relational safety that allows couples and co-parents to engage with clarity instead of reactivity.Finally, Laura explores the importance of repair after rupture—how to return to your partner or co-parent after an argument to rebuild trust and emotional safety. Listeners will leave this episode with actionable steps for de-escalation, reflective communication, and repairing relationships after conflict. Whether you're navigating divorce, learning co-parenting strategies, or simply aiming for more peaceful communication, Laura's five fresh tips offer practical, compassionate tools for staying grounded and connected even when emotions run high.

Veronique de Rugy critiques the administration's legal argument at the Supreme Court that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. She argues the term "emergency" is used too loosely, defining 50 years of trade deficits as an emergency, potentially granting the President immense, unchecked power to tax. Tariffs are taxes, which Congress should control. De Rugy notes tariffs are already causing damage by raising prices for consumers or forcing companies to cut profits and investment. 1882 NYSE

FLORIDA FRIDAY - Floridaman makes 45 calls to the police, demanding they release his wife from jail, threatens to shoot them. Floridaman opens fire over argument on how many eggs a chicken lays. Florida is being sued over recent law allowing pregnant women to park in handicapped spaces. Pro hockey team roll out the "Floridaman Cam" to make fun of opposing fans. // Weird AF News is the only daily weird news podcast in the world. Weird news 5 days/week and on Friday it's only Floridaman. SUPPORT by joining the Weird AF News Patreon http://patreon.com/weirdafnews - OR buy Jonesy a coffee at http://buymeacoffee.com/funnyjones Buy MERCH: https://weirdafnews.merchmake.com/ - Check out the official website https://WeirdAFnews.com and FOLLOW host Jonesy at http://instagram.com/funnyjones - wants Jonesy to come perform standup comedy in your city? Fill out the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfvYbm8Wgz3Oc2KSDg0-C6EtSlx369bvi7xdUpx_7UNGA_fIw/viewform

James D'Angelo, founder of the D.C.-based think tank, Congressional Research Institute, explains the reasoning behind his (and his think tank's) push for more secrecy and less transparency in Congressional Committee meetings in order to, as his Institute's website states, "improve democratic outcomes with respect to race, justice, income and wealth."

Support the Show!||SCB Twitter||Chevar's Twitter||Discord||Youtube||Facebook||Instagram||Twitch-God of War: Ragnarok-Playstation Network Card-Xbox Marketplace Card-Nintendo E-Shop CardSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/super-chevy-bros. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

DEBORAH TANNEN, best known for YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND: Women and Men in Conversation, 4 years on the NYTimes bestseller list, 8 months at #1. This conversation is about 2 later books: First, I ONLY SAY THIS BECAUSE I LOVE YOU on why we have so much trouble communicating within families - could be helpful with Thanksgiving coming up. The second, THE ARGUMENT CULTURE focuses on public discourse. Way back in 2002, she made the point that our society had become overwhelmingly adversarial, with consequences not only in our ability to solve problems but also in our personal relationships. We have all been the victims of how that has played out in the two decades since. 

Jefferson Fisher is a renowned trial attorney, bestselling author, and communication expert dedicated to helping people navigate difficult conversations with empathy and impact. As the author of "The Next Conversation: Argue Less, Talk More," Jefferson blends his legal expertise with practical insights on effective communication, emotional intelligence, and leadership. With a passion for leaving a legacy for his children and empowering others to connect rather than compete, Jefferson's approach is grounded in authenticity, the power of words, and mastering moments of high stakes with grace. His teachings resonate across boardrooms and family rooms alike, making him a trusted voice for leaders seeking real-world strategies for better conversations. Takeaways Winning an argument shouldn't be the goal—meaningful connection and understanding are far more powerful outcomes. Effective communication isn't just about the words you choose, but also about timing, tone, and emotional regulation. Leaders can transform relationships and culture by mastering control over themselves, the moment, and the pace of conversation. Sound Bites “Let your breath be the first word that you say.” “Have something to learn, not something to prove.” “When you control the pace, you are the one that has the power in the conversation.” Connect & Discover Jefferson: Instagram: @jefferson_fisher Facebook: @justaskjefferson LinkedIn: @jeffersonfisher TikTok: @justaskjefferson X: @jefferson_fishr Podcast: @TheJeffersonFisherPodcast Website: jeffersonfisher.com Book: The Next Conversation: Argue Less, Talk More 

Un creștin autentic și iubitor este cel mai puternic argument ce poate fi adus în favoarea adevărului biblic. Un asemenea om este reprezentantul lui Hristos. Viața lui este cea mai convingătoare dovadă în sprijinul puterii harului divin.Citește acest devoțional și multe alte meditații biblice pe https://devotionale.ro#devotionale #devotionaleaudio

Dans sa nouvelle création, le metteur en scène Pascal Rambert brosse le portrait d'une famille chic sur plusieurs générations.  Des enterrements, des mariages, des enfants à venir, des règlements de comptes, des amours abimés, Pascal Rambert nous raconte aussi un monde qui vacille. Plus qu'une pièce, Les Conséquences fera partie d'une trilogie dans laquelle l'on retrouvera personnages et comédiens jusqu'en 2029.  La pièce commence par un enterrement, celui de l'aïeule qui avait 106 ans et dont l'urne est sur scène, une introduction qui donne le ton d'une pièce qui est parfois très drôle, mais qui est profondément triste et désenchantée : Une pièce au ton caustique précise le metteur en scène.   Je ne fais pas des pièces à "sujets". Je fais parler des gens.  Je mets des mots sur des énergies, sur des acteurs.  Pascal Rambert   Les conséquences aborde la question du temps qui transforme les êtres, en tant que corps, mondes psychiques, collections de comportements, pour examiner de près les retentissements de nos actes. J'ai besoin de m'adresser à mon temps, j'ai envie de parler aux gens, et que ce qu'ils voient sur le plateau leur parle de ce qu'ils sont en train de penser. La pièce interroge aussi sur les conflits de génération.    Le texte de Les Conséquences est disponible aux éditions les Solitaires Intempestifs. Invité : Pascal Rambert, auteur et metteur en scène français né en 1962. De 2007 à 2016, il a dirigé le T2G (Théâtre de Gennevilliers), il travaille en France et à l'international. Ses pièces les plus connues, Clôture de l'amour et Argument explorent les rapports humains, le langage et la rupture.    Programmation musicale : Le duo Nous étions une armée avec le titre Ne pas regarder en bas.

Dans sa nouvelle création, le metteur en scène Pascal Rambert brosse le portrait d'une famille chic sur plusieurs générations.  Des enterrements, des mariages, des enfants à venir, des règlements de comptes, des amours abimés, Pascal Rambert nous raconte aussi un monde qui vacille. Plus qu'une pièce, Les Conséquences fera partie d'une trilogie dans laquelle l'on retrouvera personnages et comédiens jusqu'en 2029.  La pièce commence par un enterrement, celui de l'aïeule qui avait 106 ans et dont l'urne est sur scène, une introduction qui donne le ton d'une pièce qui est parfois très drôle, mais qui est profondément triste et désenchantée : Une pièce au ton caustique précise le metteur en scène.   Je ne fais pas des pièces à "sujets". Je fais parler des gens.  Je mets des mots sur des énergies, sur des acteurs.  Pascal Rambert   Les conséquences aborde la question du temps qui transforme les êtres, en tant que corps, mondes psychiques, collections de comportements, pour examiner de près les retentissements de nos actes. J'ai besoin de m'adresser à mon temps, j'ai envie de parler aux gens, et que ce qu'ils voient sur le plateau leur parle de ce qu'ils sont en train de penser. La pièce interroge aussi sur les conflits de génération.    Le texte de Les Conséquences est disponible aux éditions les Solitaires Intempestifs. Invité : Pascal Rambert, auteur et metteur en scène français né en 1962. De 2007 à 2016, il a dirigé le T2G (Théâtre de Gennevilliers), il travaille en France et à l'international. Ses pièces les plus connues, Clôture de l'amour et Argument explorent les rapports humains, le langage et la rupture.    Programmation musicale : Le duo Nous étions une armée avec le titre Ne pas regarder en bas.

Story 1: Last night's sweeping Democratic victory wasn't a surprise, but it is still worth talking about. Support for New York socialist Zohran Mamdani isn't just a local trend anymore as it's spreading through the Democratic Party like wildfire. Will breaks down why this wave of socialism is resonating with voters, what's fueling it, and the defining choice America will soon face. Story 2: Host of ‘Making the Argument' and Virginia House Delegate Nick Freitas joins Will to unpack what Mamdani's rise really says about America. They dive into how education, culture, and decades of Democratic policies have alienated young men, while pulling young women further Left than ever before. Nick also explains why the GOP must evolve fast or risk becoming irrelevant to the next generation. Story 3: Comedian and Host of ‘The Boyscast' & ‘Low Value Mail' Danny Polishchuk sits down with Will to share his concerns about Mamdani's victory, explaining where the quaint, simple life image of communist countries portrayed in media differs from reality. Danny and Will also discuss whether Mamdani's victory is genuine embrace of socialism or simply a middle finger to President Trump.   Subscribe to ‘Will Cain Country' on YouTube here: ⁠⁠⁠Watch Will Cain Country!⁠ Follow ‘Will Cain Country' on X (⁠@willcainshow⁠), Instagram (⁠@willcainshow⁠), TikTok (⁠@willcainshow⁠), and Facebook (⁠@willcainnews⁠) Follow Will on X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A Netflix rom-com jokes that Judaism "encourages me to argue." Turns out, that's not a joke—it's what set Abraham apart. A Netflix rom-com gives us a throwaway line that might be the most Jewish thing ever said on screen. When a young rabbi admits that Judaism loves two opposing opinions, his girlfriend lights up: "A religion that encourages me to argue? Love that." It's meant as a joke, but this week's Torah portion proves her right. Sarah laughs at divine promises, Abraham bargains with God over justice, and on Mount Moriah, even silence feels like protest. Judaism doesn't shy from disagreement—it builds holiness out of it. In Nobody Wants This Argument With God, we explore how faith, laughter, and dissent became inseparable in the Jewish imagination. Key Takeaways From Sarah's laughter to Abraham's debate, the Torah's heroes don't obey blindly — they question boldly. In Judaism, arguing with God isn't heresy — it's how prayer begins. Laughter is not only a survival mechanism its an act of defiance. Timestamps [00:00:00] Opening story – bingeing "Nobody Wants That" and connecting its theme of argument to the Abraham story. [00:01:22] Framing the Torah portions – arguing as Judaism's "love language." [00:02:19] Introduction to the podcast and this week's Parsha topic. [00:05:34] Beginning analysis of Genesis 18 – Sarah's laughter and disbelief. [00:08:09] Discussion of women's Torah commentary and reinterpretation of Sarah's fear. [00:12:30] Transition to the Sodom narrative – Abraham arguing with God. [00:17:41] Exploration of rabbinic interpretations that amplify Abraham's argument. [00:20:07] "Prayer as battle" – how the rabbis turned debate with God into daily practice. [00:26:13] Transition to the Binding of Isaac – silent inner arguments and faith. [00:30:44] Closing reflections – dialogue with God as Judaism's defining feature and farewell. Links & Learnings Sign up for free and get more from our weekly newsletter https://madlik.com/ Sefaria Source Sheet:https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/686496 Transcript here: https://madlik.substack.com/  

Heyyyy Tinies!This week, Melissa's feeling broody, Sophie's pregnancy rage is back in a BIG way and the girls debrief on their iconic Halloween couples costumes. Plus, Sophie's got a steamy book recommendation for anyone who's in the mood for a spicy read.And apparently, the wedge trainer is making a comeback?! It gets the girls thinking about all things fashion... which trends they'd wear again and which ones should stay firmly in the past.In this week's dilemmas, one Tiny has trust issues after her boyfriend slept with another girl while they were on a break. Should she give him a second chance? Another listener needs help styling her bump for her baby shower, so Sophie shares her fave pregnancy looks and outfit inspo.And we've got a special treat!! Sophie and Melissa are joined by Amanda Cronin and Nessie Welschinger from the Real Housewives of London. They chat about everything from friendship drama to filming secrets and of course, Amanda spills all about that iconic "Back to Paddington" scene...Enjoy the episode xFor more on Amanda Caroline Skincare, head to: https://amandacarolinebeauty.com/ You can order Nessie's children's cookbook, Dinosaur Cookbook here: https://www.austinmacauley.com/book/dinosaur-cookbook Got a dilemma, some personal advice for a fellow Tiny, or a follow-up to a previous one? Send us a voice note or message on Insta @wednesdayspodcast, or drop us an email at wednesdays@jampotproductions.co.uk--Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/wednesdayspodcast/TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@wednesdayspodcastEmail | wednesdays@jampotproductions.co.uk--Credits:Executive Producer: Jemima RathboneProducer: Helen BurkeAssistant Producer: Lydia BrownellVideo: Lizzie McCarthy & Jake Ji Social: Laura Coughlan Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

--

Weenis Penis Dingle Dong. Red On Air Deaf Woman. What The Fork!? How About the LA Law Way: Dr Pulaski Down the Elevator Shaft? I love a lil'whip. Most Science Is Out of Spite. Pecker inspired drone. I Don't Like Goats With CTEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. Harry Dean Stockwell. Pinball Dreams. The Over Under Chicken Sandwich. I am aware this is murder, but... Those Damn Poutines. Creamy Heist. Spite Science with Dr. Niki and more on this episode of The Morning Stream. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Leave an Amazon Rating or Review for my New York Times Bestselling book, Make Money Easy!Check out the full episode: https://greatness.lnk.to/1300Chris Voss highlights the significance of recognizing and acknowledging the emotions and underlying motivations behind an argument. By demonstrating empathy, individuals can establish a connection and create an atmosphere conducive to constructive dialogue.Sign up for the Greatness newsletter: http://www.greatness.com/newsletter Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jerusalem Demsas is one of Cardiff's favorite econ and housing journalists, a previous New Bazaar guest, and now the founder and editor of The Argument, a new magazine dedicated to making “a positive, combative case for liberalism through sharp, well-argued opinion pieces, original reporting, and multimedia content that confronts the illiberal drift in our politics.” Jerusalem and Cardiff discuss: Her meaning of liberalismHow (if?) persuasion works The politics of immigration and why it matters for the economy Drawing lines vs reaching across themIf Twitter really is “acid on community” How to societally deal with short-form video addiction…… and how Jerusalem broke her own TikTok problemWhy asking if something is cringe is itself the most cringe Finally, Jerusalem makes Cardiff look and feel super old when his reference to Reality Bites flies right by her. They close by reflecting on a hopeful trend. Related links: The ArgumentOn the Housing Crisis (Jerusalem's book of essays)Ezra Klein's podcast interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Weenis Penis Dingle Dong. Red On Air Deaf Woman. What The Fork!? How About the LA Law Way: Dr Pulaski Down the Elevator Shaft? I love a lil'whip. Most Science Is Out of Spite. Pecker inspired drone. I Don't Like Goats With CTEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. Harry Dean Stockwell. Pinball Dreams. The Over Under Chicken Sandwich. I am aware this is murder, but... Those Damn Poutines. Creamy Heist. Spite Science with Dr. Niki and more on this episode of The Morning Stream. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Tuesday Show Debates A Bunch Of Topics In Honor Of Election Day

Argument about Neglected Faithfulness | Malachi 3:13-4:3

In this episode I debunk the recurring media claim that your zodiac sign has changed by explaining the 2,000-year history of why western astrologers have deliberately used the tropical zodiac. Every few years, headlines circulate claiming that your zodiac sign has changed due to the precession of the equinoxes. Following a recent New York Times article making this claim, I decided to set the record straight. In this episode of The Astrology Podcast, I explain the history behind this recurring narrative and demonstrate why these claims are misleading. We'll explore the difference between the three zodiacs (constellational, sidereal, and tropical) and show how Western astrologers, starting with Claudius Ptolemy nearly 2,000 years ago, made a deliberate and conscious choice to use the tropical zodiac, which is aligned with the seasons, not the constellations. This is not a recent mistake or discovery; it's a foundational principle of the Western astrological tradition that has been understood for centuries by history's most prominent astrologers and astronomers. We will also touch on the issue of the so-called 13th sign, Ophiuchus, and why it doesn't apply to the system most Western astrologers use. My goal is to clarify the history so that you can better understand why your zodiac sign has not changed and feel more equipped to respond to these arguments. This is episode 509 of The Astrology Podcast. Timestamps 00:00:00 - Introduction00:00:23 - Recent New York Times Article00:00:52 - A Common Narrative That Goes Viral Every Few Years00:02:22 - The Five Main Talking Points in Anti-Astrology Articles00:02:54 - The Fundamental Problem & Rhetorical Goal of These Articles00:05:20 - Explaining the Three Zodiacs00:05:52 - The Origin of the Zodiac00:07:12 - The First Zodiac: The Constellational Zodiac00:08:22 - The Second Zodiac: The Sidereal Zodiac00:10:50 - The Foundation of Western Astrology in Hellenistic Egypt00:13:47 - How Planetary Rulers Were Assigned to Signs Based on the Seasons00:16:48 - The Third Zodiac: The Tropical Zodiac00:22:41 - The Discovery of Precession by Hipparchus00:23:56 - Ptolemy's Deliberate Choice to Use the Tropical Zodiac00:28:43 - The Source of Confusion: Using Constellation Names for Tropical Signs00:30:18 - How Ptolemy's Influence Cemented the Tropical Zodiac in the West00:32:34 - Historical Aside: Why Indian Astrology Uses the Sidereal Zodiac00:36:51 - Famous Astronomers Deliberately Used the Tropical Zodiac00:40:06 - Why the "Astrologers Made a Mistake" Argument is Flawed00:42:31 - Rebuttal: Your Zodiac Sign Has Not Changed00:43:29 - Rebuttal: The Ophiuchus "13th Sign" Argument00:44:41 - The Underlying Goal of Skeptical Articles00:50:43 - The Legitimate Internal Debate Among Astrologers00:51:51 - Conclusion and Final Thoughts00:53:32 - End cards Watch the Video Version of This Episode https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KPfvsYPv9I - Listen to the Audio Version of This Episode Listen to the audio version of this episode or download it as an MP3:

Is being "divisive" a bad thing? Our tenacious host, Mike Slater, doesn't think so when it comes to modern America's insane political and cultural climate and he's gonna tell you all about it!Following that opener, Slater gabs with U.S. Congressman Chip Roy (R-TX-21) about the ongoing government shutdown and his legislation that's aiming to combat Sharia Law in the United States of America! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Dr. James Cassidy speaks at the Reformed Forum Annual Theology Conference, held at Lakeland Church in Gurnee, Illinois on September 27, 2025. The lecture, titled "The Seed of Abraham, Christ in the patriarchs and the promise" by Dr. James Cassidy, addresses the common theological perception that New Testament authors, particularly the Apostle Paul in Galatians 3, give a "surprise ending" to the Old Testament, seemingly reading it against its original intent. Dr. Cassidy argues against this view by showing that the Abrahamic Covenant is fundamentally a covenant of grace, centered on Christ as the singular "offspring" of promise. He explains that the promise is both individual (Christ himself) and collective (all those redeemed through him from every nation), a subtlety Paul rightly handles without misinterpreting Genesis. Crucially, the address highlights that the subsequent giving of the Mosaic Law 430 years later did not and could not annul the original promise of justification by faith, thereby maintaining the primacy and immutability of God's covenant of grace. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Introduction 00:23 - Greetings and Reading of Galatians 3:15–20 02:20 - The "Surprise Ending" View of the New Testament Reading the Old Testament 04:13 - Three Parts of the Address: Paul's Theology, Eschatology, and Primacy of the New Testament Reading 04:35 - Part 1: Paul's Theology of Abraham's Offspring (Galatians 3) 05:25 - Argument from the Lesser to the Greater: Human vs. Divine Covenants 07:13 - Paul's Interpretation: Offspring is Singular (Christ) and not Plural (Ethnic Israel) 08:24 - The Grammatical Ambiguity of "Offspring" (Collective and Individual) 11:12 - The Individual and Collective Scope of the Offspring (Christ and the Church) 11:35 - The Law's Function: It Did Not Annul the Promise to Abraham 13:30 - The True Seed of Abraham is Christ and Those In Him 14:13 - Part 2: The Eschatology of Abraham's Promise 15:35 - The Delay in Fulfillment: Hope Against Hope (Romans 4) 18:24 - Abraham as the Archetypal Believer and the Nature of Saving Faith 20:18 - The Promised Land and the City Whose Builder is God (Heavenly Fulfillment) 22:15 - Christ is the Mediator of the Abrahamic Covenant 23:43 - The Abrahamic Covenant's Fulfillment in the New Covenant 25:27 - **Part 3:** The Primacy of the New Testament's Reading of the Old 26:40 - Reading the Old Testament Through the Lens of Christ 28:13 - The New Testament is the Proper Hermeneutical Key to the Old 30:17 - Application: Gospel Living and World Missions 32:00 - Conclusion and The Blessings to All Nations 35:55 - Final Exhortation

We tackle ten common arguments against free speech. FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff and FIRE Senior Fellow and former ACLU President Nadine Strossen are the co-authors of the new book, "War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail."   Timestamps:  00:00 Intro  01:18 Book's origins 04:25 Argument #1: Words are violence 20:27 Argument #2: Words are dangerous 25:09 Argument #3: Hate speech isn't free speech 31:06 Argument #4: About shoutdowns 37:18 Argument #5: Free speech is outdated 45:41 Argument #6 Free speech is right-wing 50:14 Argument #7: About that crowded theater and marketplace of ideas 59:27 Argument #9: Misinformation and disinformation 01:03:53 Argument #8: Free speech protects power 01:09:30 Argument #10: About the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide 01:13:35 Outro Get the Book:Purchase War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail. Enjoy listening to the podcast? Donate to FIRE today (https://www.thefire.org/) and get exclusive content like member webinars, special episodes, and more. If you became a FIRE Member through a donation to FIRE at thefire.org and would like access to Substack's paid subscriber podcast feed, please email sotospeak@thefire.org.

Pramila Jayapal says entering the country illegally isn’t criminal. Amazon announced it will layoff about 10 percent of its corporate workforce. Guest: Mukilteo Police Chief Andy Illyn on their upcoming annual ‘Cuts with Cops’ event. // Big Local: Redmond is using new AI technology to solve crimes. An Issaquah woman was detained outside of a preschool. Stanwood police says that it will consider pedal-free e-bikes as motorcycles. // You Pick the Topic: A woman says she and her husband quit their jobs to oppose Trump.

Cessationism vs. Continuationism: Which side is right? Are spiritual gifts really a thing of the past? We're continuing our review and response to cessationist arguments that the spiritual gifts have ceased. We're tackling Pastor Tom Pennington's claims from G3 Ministries, exposing flaws in the logic of his arguments and championing the ongoing reality of spiritual gifts by examining Scripture. In this episode we'll address his arguments about the spiritual gifts in church history, the sufficiency of Scripture, and New Testament rules for spiritual gifts.If you missed part 1 of our review, you can watch that episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCCSiTMkHAY0:00 – Introduction1:38 – Recent Testimonies of Prophecy and Healing5:25 – Episode Overview: Pennington's Arguments 5-77:15 – Argument 5: Testimony of Church History10:59 – Refuting Hebrews 2 and NT Mentions25:15 – Early Church Fathers on Continuing Gifts37:09 – Argument 6: Sufficiency of Scripture44:38 – Responding to Heresies and Sufficiency45:14 – Argument 7: NT Rules for Miraculous Gifts51:14 – Closing Thoughts Subscribe to The Remnant Radio newsletter and receive our FREE introduction to spiritual gifts eBook. Plus, get access to: discounts, news about upcoming shows, courses and conferences - and more. Subscribe now at TheRemnantRadio.com.Support the showABOUT THE REMNANT RADIO:

Digital Drama 10-28-2025 …Don't ruin my concert experience with your iPhone …Argument over Skinny Jeans ends in Divorce

In this episode, Robert Llewellyn sits down with Feann Torr from  @carsales  to unpack the electric vehicle revolution transforming Australia. From BYD and MG to Tesla and Hyundai, they discuss how Chinese automakers are shaking up the industry and driving EVs to become the most affordable option on the market. Feann shares his insights into the rapid rise of EV interest — growing from 30% to 37% of Australian car buyers — and explains how China has become the country's third-largest source of car imports. They also discuss how Chinese EVs are winning the price war, the psychological shift that's making electric cars feel like “just another car” to new buyers, and why the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is converting even the most loyal V8 fans. Finally, Feann and Robert couldn't help but get just a little excited about the groundbreaking potential of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology and what it could mean for an energy-independent Australia.  https://www.carsales.com.au/ 00:00:07 - Global EV Adoption: Norway, China, and the General State of Growth 00:01:47 - Introducing Feann Torr & Carsales Australia's Editorial Focus 00:02:38 - EV Price Parity: The Electric Car is Becoming the Cheapest Option 00:04:30 - Feann's Background, from Video Games to the Automotive Crossroads 00:06:08 - The Chinese EV Invasion in Australia (BYD, GWM) 00:08:45 - The Psychology of EV Adoption: EVs as "Just Cars" 00:09:52 - Country of Origin: Dealing with Geopolitical Pushback 00:12:06 - The Shifting Mindset: Diminishing EV Resistance (Australia's 8% Market) 00:14:14 - The Narrowing Cost Gap & The Arrival of Sub-$30,000 EVs 00:16:17 - Chinese Cars Overtake Korean Brands in Australian Imports 00:18:20 - Shock at the Shanghai Motor Show & Chinese Tech Dominance 00:20:51 - Mainstream Japanese Brands (Mazda/Toyota) Partnering for EV Platforms 00:23:49 - The Rapid Growth of Australia's Charging Network (EVIE, Charge Fox) 00:27:07 - On-Street Charging Rules and Innovative Lamppost Chargers in Sydney 00:30:16 - Tesla's Dominance Challenged by New, Affordable Chinese Rivals 00:33:38 - The Value of the Everything Electric Test Drive Experience (130k Drives) 00:37:07 - Carsales Survey Data: Rising EV Consideration (30% to 37%) 00:39:06 - The Secondhand EV Market & Steep Depreciation (Good for Buyers) 00:43:57 - Busting the Battery Replacement Myth (CATL's 90-Year Battery) 00:50:31 - The Enthusiast Market: V8s vs. High-Performance EVs (Hyundai Ioniq 5 N) 00:56:45 - The Argument for Energy Independence & Australia's Solar Capacity 01:03:00 - The Future: Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) and Powering Your Home from Your Car 01:05:01 - Beyond Cars: Electric Skateboards, Ferries, and Flying Vehicles 01:08:29 - Final Thoughts and Conclusion Why not come and join us at our next Everything Electric expo: https://everythingelectric.show Check out our sister channel Everything Electric CARS: https://www.youtube.com/@fullychargedshow Support our StopBurningStuff campaign: https://www.patreon.com/STOPBurningStuff Become an Everything Electric Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/fullychargedshow Buy the Fully Charged Guide to Electric Vehicles & Clean Energy : https://buff.ly/2GybGt0 Subscribe for episode alerts and the Everything Electric newsletter: https://fullycharged.show/zap-sign-up/ Visit: https://FullyCharged.Show Find us on X: https://x.com/Everyth1ngElec Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/officialeverythingelectric To partner, exhibit or sponsor at our award-winning expos email: commercial@fullycharged.show Everything Electric MELBOURNE - Melbourne Showgrounds 14th, 15th & 16th November 2025 Everything Electric SYDNEY - Sydney Olympic Park 6th, 7th & 8th March 2026 EE NORTH (Harrogate) - 8th & 9th May 2026 EE WEST (Cheltenham) - 12th & 13th June 2026 EE GREATER LONDON (Twickenham) - 11th & 12th Sept 2026   #fullychargedshow #everythingelectricshow #homeenergy #cleanenergy #battery #electriccars #electric-vehicles-uk #australia #byd #tesla #hyundai

Topics covered in this episode: Cyclopts: A CLI library * The future of Python web services looks GIL-free* * Free-threaded GC* * Polite lazy imports for Python package maintainers* Extras Joke Watch on YouTube About the show Sponsored by us! Support our work through: Our courses at Talk Python Training The Complete pytest Course Patreon Supporters Connect with the hosts Michael: @mkennedy@fosstodon.org / @mkennedy.codes (bsky) Brian: @brianokken@fosstodon.org / @brianokken.bsky.social Show: @pythonbytes@fosstodon.org / @pythonbytes.fm (bsky) Join us on YouTube at pythonbytes.fm/live to be part of the audience. Usually Monday at 10am PT. Older video versions available there too. Finally, if you want an artisanal, hand-crafted digest of every week of the show notes in email form? Add your name and email to our friends of the show list, we'll never share it. Michael #1: Cyclopts: A CLI library A CLI library that fixes 13 annoying issues in Typer Much of Cyclopts was inspired by the excellent Typer library. Despite its popularity, Typer has some traits that I (and others) find less than ideal. Part of this stems from Typer's age, with its first release in late 2019, soon after Python 3.8's release. Because of this, most of its API was initially designed around assigning proxy default values to function parameters. This made the decorated command functions difficult to use outside of Typer. With the introduction of Annotated in python3.9, type-hints were able to be directly annotated, allowing for the removal of these proxy defaults. The 13: Argument vs Option Positional or Keyword Arguments Choices Default Command Docstring Parsing Decorator Parentheses Optional Lists Keyword Multiple Values Flag Negation Help Defaults Validation Union/Optional Support Adding a Version Flag Documentation Brian #2: The future of Python web services looks GIL-free Giovanni Barillari “Python 3.14 was released at the beginning of the month. This release was particularly interesting to me because of the improvements on the "free-threaded" variant of the interpreter. Specifically, the two major changes when compared to the free-threaded variant of Python 3.13 are: Free-threaded support now reached phase II, meaning it's no longer considered experimental The implementation is now completed, meaning that the workarounds introduced in Python 3.13 to make code sound without the GIL are now gone, and the free-threaded implementation now uses the adaptive interpreter as the GIL enabled variant. These facts, plus additional optimizations make the performance penalty now way better, moving from a 35% penalty to a 5-10% difference.” Lots of benchmark data, both ASGI and WSGI Lots of great thoughts in the “Final Thoughts” section, including “On asynchronous protocols like ASGI, despite the fact the concurrency model doesn't change that much – we shift from one event loop per process, to one event loop per thread – just the fact we no longer need to scale memory allocations just to use more CPU is a massive improvement. ” “… for everybody out there coding a web application in Python: simplifying the concurrency paradigms and the deployment process of such applications is a good thing.” “… to me the future of Python web services looks GIL-free.” Michael #3: Free-threaded GC The free-threaded build of Python uses a different garbage collector implementation than the default GIL-enabled build. The Default GC: In the standard CPython build, every object that supports garbage collection (like lists or dictionaries) is part of a per-interpreter, doubly-linked list. The list pointers are contained in a PyGC_Head structure. The Free-Threaded GC: Takes a different approach. It scraps the PyGC_Head structure and the linked list entirely. Instead, it allocates these objects from a special memory heap managed by the "mimalloc" library. This allows the GC to find and iterate over all collectible objects using mimalloc's data structures, without needing to link them together manually. The free-threaded GC does NOT support "generations” By marking all objects reachable from these known roots, we can identify a large set of objects that are definitely alive and exclude them from the more expensive cycle-finding part of the GC process. Overall speedup of the free-threaded GC collection is between 2 and 12 times faster than the 3.13 version. Brian #4: Polite lazy imports for Python package maintainers Will McGugan commented on a LI post by Bob Belderbos regarding lazy importing “I'm excited about this PEP. I wrote a lazy loading mechanism for Textual's widgets. Without it, the entire widget library would be imported even if you needed just one widget. Having this as a core language feature would make me very happy.” https://github.com/Textualize/textual/blob/main/src/textual/widgets/__init__.py Well, I was excited about Will's example for how to, essentially, allow users of your package to import only the part they need, when they need it. So I wrote up my thoughts and an explainer for how this works. Special thanks to Trey Hunner's Every dunder method in Python, which I referenced to understand the difference between __getattr__() and __getattribute__(). Extras Brian: Started writing a book on Test Driven Development. Should have an announcement in a week or so. I want to give folks access while I'm writing it, so I'll be opening it up for early access as soon as I have 2-3 chapters ready to review. Sign up for the pythontest newsletter if you'd like to be informed right away when it's ready. Or stay tuned here. Michael: New course!!! Agentic AI Programming for Python I'll be on Vanishing Gradients as a guest talking book + ai for data scientists OpenAI launches ChatGPT Atlas https://github.com/jamesabel/ismain by James Abel Pets in PyCharm Joke: You're absolutely right

3. Supply vs. Demand: Economic Shocks, Entitlements, and the Invisible Population Nicholas Eberstadt Book: Men Without Work (Post-Pandemic Edition) Eberstadt explores the competing explanations for the ghost army, contrasting his supply-side argument (men holding back labor/unpreparedness) with demand-side views from critics Henry Olsen and Jared Bernstein. Olsen highlights the role of economic shocks and structural changes, like the 1970s stagflation and deindustrialization (the Rust Belt). The role of entitlements is significant, as over half of NILF men receive at least one benefit, often disability payments like SSDI. Regional differences in labor force participation (e.g., high inactivity in West Virginia adjacent to low inactivity in Maryland) mitigate a purely national demand-side case. The source stresses the lack of data on the estimated 25 million ex-convicts, who are an "invisible population" largely untracked by labor statistics. 1929

Man Pulls Gun During Argument then he gets Beatdown