Podcasts about critics

The IRS just dropped a bombshell, effectively kneecapping the Johnson Amendment and letting religious organizations openly politick from the pulpit without losing their tax-exempt status. Critics warn this could turn churches into tax-free PACs, funneling dark money into elections and further blurring the lines between church and state. While rarely enforced, this move exposes a glaring double standard, eroding fundamental principles of separation and allowing unchecked religious influence in politics. It's a classic case of religious overreach, threatening the integrity of both institutions and democracy itself, all while secular organizations play by stricter rules. The implications for public policy and fair elections are concerning, as accountability vanishes.News Source:IRS Now Says Pastors Can Endorse Political CandidatesBy NPRJuly 8, 2025

Zo just witnessed the most fascinating news conference: the most famous man in the world: neurosurgeon, rock star, physicist and martial arts expert, Dr. Buckaroo Banzai, had just announced that he and his tightknit crew - the Hong Kong Cavaliers recently perfected a way to cross into a completely different dimension. While in this strange new dimension Dr. Banzai had seen strange beings and fantastic landscapes. Dr. Banzai even captured one of the creatures from this other dimension and brought it back to Earth, but, from the way it looks, Zo believed that it was better to leave the dimensional barrier shut. We have enough troubles right here on Earth; there's no need to invite more trouble from an entirely different reality. Episode Segments00:03:45 Opening Credits for Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension starring: Peter Weller, John Lithgow and Ellen Barkin00:17:53 Favorite Parts of the 1984 film: Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension01:02:05 Trivia from the sci-fi action comedy movie: Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension01:16:34 Critics' Thoughts on W.D. Richter's Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension #BuckarooBanzai #Whereeveryougothereyouare Please leave a comment, suggestion or question on our social media: Back Look Cinema: The Podcast Links:Website: www.backlookcinema.comEmail: fanmail@backlookcinema.comYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@backlookcinemaTwitter: https://twitter.com/backlookcinemaFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/BackLookCinemaInstagram: https://instagram.com/backlookcinemaThreads: https://www.threads.net/@backlookcinemaTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@backlookcinemaTwitch https://www.twitch.tv/backlookcinemaBlue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/backlookcinema.bsky.socialMastodon: https://mstdn.party/@backlookcinemaBack Look Cinema Merch at Teespring.comBack Look Cinema Merch at Teepublic.com Again, thanks for listening.

President Donald Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics just hours after the release of a weaker-than-expected jobs report. Critics say the termination of Erika McEntarfer could undermine confidence in the U.S. economy. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis joins The Weekend to discuss the impact of the recent jobs report and the President's tariff wars.. There are lots of new developments in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's accomplice and convicted sex trafficker, was transferred from a low-security federal prison in Florida to a smaller, less restrictive prison camp in Texas. Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansar joins The Weekend to discuss the latest developments of the scandal.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been quietly moved from the low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida to a minimum-security facility in Bryan, Texas—a shift that has raised serious questions. The timing of her transfer, which occurred shortly after a closed-door meeting with senior officials at the Department of Justice, is especially suspect. That meeting, reportedly centered on Maxwell providing names connected to Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network, was followed by this abrupt relocation to a prison camp known for its lighter restrictions and more comfortable conditions. It's not hard to see this for what it looks like: a reward, not a coincidence.The prison camp in Bryan, Texas is a far cry from even the modest constraints of Tallahassee. Dormitory housing, no perimeter fencing, minimal supervision—this is not where you send someone convicted of trafficking girls to billionaires. While survivors continue to fight for accountability and answers, Maxwell is being eased into a facility that resembles a quiet retreat more than a prison. Critics argue this reeks of backroom deals and institutional privilege—further proof that in the American justice system, those with connections can still trade secrets for comfort while the people they helped exploit remain invisible and unheard.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell quietly moved out of Fla. prison

Friday - Clark Stinks day! Christa shares Clark Stinks posts with Clark. Submit yours at Clark.com/ClarkStinks. Also in this episode,  a Christmas pricing preview - and word to Amazon Prime loyalists about new pricing, and cheaper alternatives. Clark Stinks: Segments 1 & 2 Amazon Price Changes: Segment 3 Ask Clark: Segment 4 Mentioned on the show: Why You Should Never Mail a Check  /  What Is FedNow? What Is a Roth 401(k) and How Does It Work? Social Security Survivor Benefits Amazon Raised Prices on Hundreds of Essentials After Trump Unveiled Tariffs Amazon Prime vs. Sam's Club: Which membership is a better deal? Walmart+ Membership Program: 4 Things To Know Best Credit Cards to Use at Walmart in 2025 The Platinum Card® from American Express Review: Is It Worth It? What Is a Fiduciary Financial Advisor and Do I Need One? Clark.com resources Episode transcripts Community.Clark.com  /  Ask Clark Clark.com daily money newsletter Consumer Action Center Free Helpline: 636-492-5275 Learn more about your ad choices: megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

 DownloadWelcome to LOTC Presents DD 67 episode 438. This week the show starts with Ian Irza and GregaMortis finishing their review of Vinegar Syndromes volume 3 Crazy Desires Of A Murderer as well as The Perfume Of The Lady In Black. We hope you enjoy our discussion on this one, you can also check out Ian and Greg on YouTube for the video version of this review. Click the YouTube link below under Greg's links. Lastly the Twisted Temptress and GregaMortis are interviewing author and filmmaker Brian Luciano Barsuglia about his newest novel, Seven Rivers The Darkness. We want to thank Brina for being on the show. We hope each and every one will purchase this book today. Links below for ordering.  Thank You for checking this episode out.Sit back and grab those favorite snacks and beverages as you journey with us through the Land Of The Creeps!!HELP KEEP HORROR ALIVE!!MOVIE REVIEWS1974 THE PERFUME OF THE LADY IN BLACKIAN : 10GREG : 91977 CRAZY DESIRES OF A MURDERERIAN : 6GREG : 6.5BRIAN LUCIANO BARSUGLIA LINKSBOOK WEBSITEAMAZON LINK FOR BOOKLINKS FOR DOUBLE DOUBLEGregaMortisFacebookTwitterLand Of The Creeps Group PageLand Of The Creeps Fan PageJay Of  The Dead's New Horror Movie PodcastYoutubeInstagramEmailLetterboxdTwisted Temptress LinkLetterboxdIAN IRZA LINKSBLOG SITEFACEBOOKTWITTERINSTAGRAMLETTERBOXDLOTC Hotline Number1-804-569-56821-804-569-LOTCLOTC Intro is provided by Andy Ussery, Below are links to his social mediaEmail:FacebookTwitterLespecial FacebookLespecial Website

Jeffrey Epstein maintained an unusually close and long-standing relationship with his two most trusted financial lieutenants: Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn. Indyke, Epstein's longtime personal attorney, served not only as legal counsel but also as a key architect of Epstein's complex web of shell companies, trusts, and offshore accounts. He helped set up many of the financial and corporate structures that shielded Epstein's wealth and facilitated his operations. Richard Kahn, a former accountant at a firm connected to Indyke, acted as Epstein's financial fixer, later becoming co-executor of Epstein's estate alongside Indyke. Both men were not merely peripheral aides—they were integral to Epstein's inner circle, privy to his assets, movements, and network, and heavily involved in managing his wealth both before and after his death.Following Epstein's 2019 death, Indyke and Kahn became central figures in administering his $600+ million estate through the creation of the “1953 Trust.” They faced intense scrutiny over their roles in shielding Epstein's finances and for allegedly facilitating hush money payments to silence survivors. Although both denied wrongdoing, court documents, depositions, and victim testimony repeatedly identified them as enablers who played a hands-on role in maintaining Epstein's system of control. Critics argue that their deep entanglement in Epstein's financial operations raises serious questions about their own liability and ethical conduct. Despite calls for their removal, they remained in control of the estate for years—distributing assets, settling lawsuits, and holding the keys to Epstein's secrets.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.longislandpress.com/2021/03/01/how-feds-say-2-long-islanders-helped-jeffrey-epstein-run-a-sex-trafficking-ring/

"Gary Unmarried" aired on CBS from 2008-2010. Created by Ed Yeager, the show starred Jay Mohr as Gary Brooks, a recently divorced painting contractor navigating life as a single dad while re0e for the first time in thirty years. This was used as one of the shows in CBS's effort to build a solid comedy block. "Gary Unmarried" received mixed-to-positive reviews. Critics often praised Jay Mohr's likability and comic timing, but some found the writing predictable and derivative. It earned a 2009 People's Choice Award for Favorite New TV Comedy, suggesting it had some fan support. Despite its early promise, CBS canceled the show after two seasons due to declining ratings. Despite never being on any of the S1E1 boys' radar originally will they take an interest in this one? Listen as they deep dive the show's pilot episode. Starring: Jay Mohr, Paula Marshall, Jaime King, Al Madrigal, Ryan Malgarini, Laura Marano, Ashley Farley, & Ed Bagley Jr. www.S1E1POD.com Instagram & X (Twitter): @S1E1POD

Two weeks ago, when Paramount cancelled “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” insiders in Hollywood and Washington alike deemed the move suspicious: Colbert had just called his parent company's payout to Trump a “big fat bribe” on air. Paramount, for its part, claims that the decision was purely financial—Colbert's show is losing forty million dollars a year. But both the political and economic explanations reveal how the landscape of late night has changed since Johnny Carson's day. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider Colbert's body of work and the state of the genre more generally, from the so-called late-night wars of the nineties through to the modern challenge of making comedy in a country where nothing feels funny anymore. “Late-night hosting is an art, but it's also business. So, if your job is to get as many eyeballs on you as is humanly possible, what do you do?” Schwartz says. “It's not easy to have fun with the news, as it is. And if you are having fun with it, something may very well be wrong.”Read, watch, and listen with the critics:“Strangers with Candy” (1999–2000)“The Daily Show” (1996–)“The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” (2015–26)“The Staying Power of the ‘S.N.L.' Machine” (The New Yorker)“Lessons from ‘Sesame Street' ” (The New Yorker)“The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson” (1962–92)“David Letterman's Revolutionary Comedy,” by Emily Nussbaum (The New Yorker)“The Colbert Rapport,” by Emily Nussbaum (The New Yorker)“Carpool Karaoke” (2017–23)“What the Cancellation of Stephen Colbert's ‘Late Show' Means,” by Vinson Cunningham (The New Yorker)“After Midnight” (2024–25)New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Leon Black, the former cofounder of Apollo Global Management with deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein, has donated significant sums to the IPI—reportedly at least $950,000—in a pattern that closely mirrors Epstein's own shadowy funding of the institute. Even though Black has attempted to distance himself publicly, the conduit appears to have been deliberately opaque: donations through intermediaries, anonymity, and minimal disclosure have raised flags among those investigating Epstein's network. These contributions come under scrutiny not only because Epstein was involved in brokering them but also because the donations were structured to conceal the true source and avoid public recognition.Meanwhile, Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden has escalated concerns by requesting documents from the DOJ, Treasury, and FBI about Black's financing of Epstein's operations. Wyden's investigation revealed that Black transferred at least $170 million to Epstein between 2012 and 2017—far exceeding the $158 million previously acknowledged—and that some of those funds directly supported Epstein's operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. In 2023, Black settled claims with the USVI by paying $62.5 million—a case that stated some of his payments were used to fund Epstein's illicit activities on Little St. James Island. Critics argue that the use of IPI and other charitable vehicles to mask these funds reflects a deliberate effort to launder legitimacy onto Epstein's network.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dn.no/politikk/the-international-peace-institute/jeffrey-epstein/terje-rod-larsen/leon-black-did-like-his-adviser-jeffrey-epstein-gave-anonymously-to-un-affiliated-think-tank/2-1-897114

France and Canada have promised to formally recognize Palestine at the U.N. General Assembly in September. The U.K. will join them if Israel doesn’t agree to a ceasefire with Hamas. Humans are extracting fresh water from underground aquifers, accelerating the drying of land all over the world and driving sea level rise, according to a new study. Critics review the latest film releases: “The Naked Gun,” “Bad Guys 2,” “Together,” and “Folktales.” Consider these cold soup recipes: One from Eastern Europe, one from Spain, and one starring the summer ingredient corn. 

Want to reach out to us? Want to leave a comment or review? Want to give us a suggestion or berate Anthony? Send us a text by clicking this link!This episode dives deep into a controversial topic that's increasingly dividing Catholic circles: Is it acceptable to criticize post-conciliar popes? We examine how modern Church leaders often seem reluctant to boldly proclaim traditional Catholic teachings, instead offering apologies for historical Church actions like the Crusades and Inquisition.The cultural divide between cradle Catholics and converts becomes evident as we discuss how differently they perceive papal criticism. Many who entered the Church under Pope Francis's pontificate struggle with the concept that one can question certain papal statements while remaining faithful to the Church herself. This dynamic creates fascinating tensions in how Catholics understand their relationship with Church authority.Between theological discussions, we explore broader cultural phenomena that reflect similar themes of institutional weakness. From a woman wanting to divorce her "perfect" husband because she "can't find herself," to fitness influencer Joey Swoll's groveling apology for commemorating Hulk Hogan, we witness how quickly people abandon reasonable positions when faced with criticism or emotional discomfort.Whether examining Cardinal Tagle leading jean-clad influencers in prayer at the Vatican or the differences between traditional and progressive Catholic approaches, this episode provides a thoughtful, nuanced exploration of how to remain faithful while engaging critically with Church leadership. Join us as we navigate the delicate balance between respectful obedience and necessary critique in today's complex Catholic landscape.Support the showSponsored by Recusant Cellars, an unapologetically Catholic and pro-life winery from Washington state. Use code BASED at checkout for 10% off! https://recusantcellars.com/********************************************************Please subscribe! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKsxnv80ByFV4OGvt_kImjQ?sub_confirmation=1https://www.avoidingbabylon.comLocals Community: https://avoidingbabylon.locals.comRSS Feed for Podcast Apps: https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/1987412.rssRumble: https://rumble.com/c/AvoidingBabylon

Mike Marcangelo and Rayshawn Buchanan return on Kayfabe Critics with a heavyweight episode that opens with a clear-eyed, layered discussion of Hulk Hogan's passing and legacy, then pivots into a full preview of WWE SummerSlam 2025, the first ever two-night Premium Live Event from MetLife Stadium, with predictions, booking analysis, celebrity involvement breakdowns, and cross-era context.What's covered in this episode:Hulk Hogan's death and legacyThe hosts wrestle with how to separate Terry Bollea the person from Hulk Hogan the cultural icon, examining his role in transforming pro wrestling into mainstream entertainment, the contradictions in his public and private life, and why his death marks a pivotal moment in sports entertainment history. The episode incorporates the most recent reporting on his sudden passing on July 24, 2025, the confirmed cause being a heart attack amid underlying health struggles, and the global reaction from fans, peers, and family. WWE's new documentary series and kayfabe evolutionMike and Rayshawn dig into the reception and implications of WWE: Unreal on Netflix, the behind-the-scenes docuseries that launched July 29, 2025, exposing creative processes, hidden tensions, star development, and the ongoing debate between traditional kayfabe preservation and full transparency. They unpack fan backlash, talent reactions, notable revelations about story shaping, and what this means for future storytelling in WWE. SummerSlam 2025 comprehensive breakdownThe heart of the episode is a match-by-match analysis and prediction slate for SummerSlam 2025 across both nights, including:Cody Rhodes vs John Cena street fight for the undisputed WWE title, double turn possibilities, legacy finishes, and speculation on final opponents and special guest refereesCM Punk vs Gunther for the World Heavyweight Championship, with a speculative Seth Rollins Money in the Bank cash-in finish that would reshape momentum heading into WrestleManiaRoman Reigns & Jey Uso vs Bron Breaker & Bronson Reed and the tension between established dynasties and breakthrough new starsJade Cargill vs Tiffany Stratton, risk/reward storytelling and whether Stratton can carry big momentsCelebrity crossover matches including Jelly Roll teaming with Randy Orton against Drew McIntyre & Logan Paul, examining credibility, preparation, and why modern celebrity integrations (excluding outliers) have evolved into substantive contributions rather than distractionsKarrion Kross's momentum and mid-card title opportunity thesis, Sami Zayn's positioning, and the utility of authentic promos in building investmentWomen's tag dynamics with Charlotte Flair & Alexa Bliss, and the broader women's title scene, including Rhea Ripley, Theo Sky, Naomi and how previous classic rivalries inform the current storytelling.

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Donate (no account necessary) | Subscribe (account required) Join Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Operations Officer, as he dives into today's top stories shaping America and the world. In today's episode, we cover Fed Interest Rate Decision and AI's Impact on Jobs The Federal Reserve will announce today whether it will cut interest rates. Meanwhile, new data shows that artificial intelligence is displacing young college graduates across industries, pushing many into unemployment and reshaping the labor market. Trump EPA Targets Climate Rules for Vehicles The EPA moves to eliminate the Obama-era policy that declared vehicle emissions a threat to public health. If approved, automakers would no longer be bound by federal climate regulations. Supporters call it a win for consumer choice and industrial growth. Critics claim it ignores climate risks. Sun-Dimming Geoengineering Experiment Revealed A University of Washington team quietly launched a project in California to create a giant cloud that would reflect sunlight and cool the Earth. Local officials shut it down, but documents reveal plans for a 4,000-square-mile version visible from space. Bryan details the long, surprising history of geoengineering experiments in the United States and abroad. Tsunami Alerts Following Russian Earthquake A massive 8.8 earthquake strikes off the Russian coast, triggering tsunami warnings across the Pacific. Concerns mount over possible impacts to Japan's Fukushima nuclear site, as well as U.S. coastlines and island territories. "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

This Day in Legal History: Medicare and Medicaid Signed into BeingOn July 30, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Amendments of 1965 into law, creating the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The signing took place at the Truman Library in Independence, Missouri, with former President Harry S. Truman—an early advocate for national health insurance—present and symbolically receiving the first Medicare card. Medicare was designed to provide hospital and medical insurance to Americans aged 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history. Medicaid, created alongside Medicare, offered healthcare assistance to low-income individuals and families.At the time, nearly half of Americans over 65 had no health insurance. The passage of Medicare was a landmark achievement of Johnson's Great Society initiative and built on decades of political struggle over healthcare reform. The legislation amended Title XVIII of the Social Security Act and was strongly opposed by many in the medical establishment and conservative politicians who labeled it as “socialized medicine.” Nevertheless, the program gained rapid popularity and provided immediate relief to millions.Administered by the federal government, Medicare initially had two parts: Part A, covering hospital insurance, and Part B, covering outpatient and physician services. It has since evolved to include prescription drug coverage (Part D) and options for private plans (Medicare Advantage). The law reshaped the American healthcare landscape and established the principle that access to healthcare for seniors was a federal responsibility.The U.S. Senate confirmed Emil Bove, a former lawyer for Donald Trump and senior Justice Department official, to a lifetime seat on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a narrow 50-49 vote. Bove faced unified Democratic opposition and criticism from over 900 former DOJ employees, who claimed he undermined the department's integrity. His nomination prompted a Democratic walkout during the Senate Judiciary Committee's vote and drew sharp condemnation from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.Despite controversy, Republicans praised Bove's background as a federal terrorism prosecutor and his legal work defending Trump in several criminal cases. His confirmation shifts the appellate court's balance back in favor of Republican appointees. Critics cited Bove's alleged directives that defied judicial authority and political interference in a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. Bove denied wrongdoing in both instances. His confirmation is part of Trump's renewed effort in his second term to reshape the judiciary, following over 230 appointments in his first term. Trump has also nominated another close adviser, Jennifer Mascott, to the same court.Trump lawyer Bove confirmed to US appeals court, overcoming Democratic opposition | ReutersBove Confirmed to Appeals Court After Whistleblowers Emerge (1)A White House crypto task force established by President Trump is set to release a highly anticipated report outlining the administration's policy goals for the digital asset sector. The report, expected Wednesday, will address tokenization, market structure legislation, and a regulatory framework for blockchain-based financial products. Created by executive order shortly after Trump took office in January, the group is led by Bo Hines and includes top officials such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and SEC Chair Paul Atkins.The document is expected to support expanded use of tokenization, which converts traditional assets like stocks and real estate into blockchain-based tokens. The report may call on the SEC to create a framework enabling firms like Coinbase to offer tokenized securities, though specific language remains under wraps. It will also outline the White House's preferences for crypto legislation currently advancing in Congress, including follow-up to the recently passed stablecoin law.Trump has made pro-crypto policies a centerpiece of his administration, reversing many of the enforcement actions taken under President Biden, such as lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance. While the industry sees the report as a roadmap for mainstream integration, concerns remain about conflicts of interest, particularly given Trump's financial ties to crypto ventures and meme coins. The administration has denied any ethical violations.White House set to unveil closely watched crypto policy report | ReutersThe Trump administration has formally requested the release of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, citing public interest and mounting pressure over the government's handling of the sex trafficking cases. Prosecutors filed late-night motions with U.S. District Judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer, arguing that the sealed testimony should now be disclosed, though the judges had previously asked for stronger legal justification. Grand jury records are typically secret, with limited exceptions for disclosure.Trump said he directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the unsealing after the Justice Department reaffirmed its conclusion that Epstein died by suicide and that there was no list of elite clients—a stance that frustrated some Trump supporters who suspect a cover-up. Epstein died in 2019 before his trial; Maxwell, convicted in 2021, is serving a 20-year sentence and has appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn her conviction.In a related effort, a Florida judge recently denied a separate request to release grand jury records from earlier state investigations into Epstein, ruling they did not meet legal exceptions. Even if the federal judges allow the current transcripts to be unsealed, the documents may not reveal new information, since much of the testimony was covered during Maxwell's trial. The transcripts also wouldn't encompass the full scope of investigative material held by the government.Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former Trump lawyer, recently met with Maxwell for two days, reportedly seeking any names or evidence she could provide about others potentially involved. Neither Blanche nor Maxwell's attorney has commented in detail on those meetings.Trump administration asks judges to release Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts | ReutersA Massachusetts jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay over $42 million to Paul Lovell, who developed mesothelioma after decades of using the company's talc products. Lovell and his wife sued in 2021, claiming the talc contained asbestos that he unknowingly inhaled, and accused J&J of failing to warn consumers despite knowing the risks. The jury awarded damages for pain, suffering, and medical costs.J&J denied any wrongdoing, calling the verdict “junk science” and saying its products are asbestos-free and safe, with plans to appeal the decision. The company ended U.S. sales of talc-based baby powder in 2020. This case adds to a string of multi-million-dollar verdicts against J&J in talc-related mesothelioma lawsuits, although some have been overturned on appeal.J&J is facing over 63,000 active lawsuits, and possibly up to 100,000 claims in total, most alleging ovarian cancer from talc use. The company's attempts to resolve the claims through bankruptcy have failed in court three times, including a $10 billion settlement proposal rejected in March. The Lovell case is part of ongoing litigation that continues to test J&J's legal strategy and product safety claims.Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $42M after jury finds talc caused man's cancer | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Nashville announces partnership with Elon Musk's Boring Company for an underground transit tunnel.Project aims to connect downtown Nashville directly to Nashville International Airport (BNA).Proposed 10-mile Tesla tunnel expected to reduce travel time from 30 minutes to under 10 minutes.Tunnel seeks to ease heavy traffic on the busy I-40 corridor.Boring Company will conduct detailed feasibility studies before construction begins.Project cost may approach hundreds of millions of dollars, based on similar ventures in other cities.Nashville officials anticipate economic and tourism benefits from efficient transit solution.Critics question capacity, scalability, and long-term viability based on past projects.Next step: Nashville awaits feasibility results before formal approval.City officials see the project as key to managing growing traffic and boosting local appeal.

Justin Bieber BioSnap a weekly updated Biography.Justin Bieber is making bigger headlines than ever as he settles firmly into family life and stages a career resurgence that has the music world buzzing. The most talked-about development this week is Bieber's heartwarming Instagram posts sharing glimpses of life with his 11-month-old son Jack Blues Bieber. Ahead of Jack's first birthday, Justin gave fans two new photos this past Sunday—always careful not to show Jack's face, keeping the promise he and wife Hailey Bieber made to protect their son's privacy. In an email interview with Elle, Justin described fatherhood as walking in the days he always dreamed of. Hailey, meanwhile, opened up to Vogue about the emotional challenges of unexpected motherhood and described Jack as her life's greatest teacher.Professionally, Justin's comeback keeps gathering steam following his surprise July 11 release of Swag, his seventh studio album and first in four years. Critics have widely praised the album's more soulful sound and explorations of love and family, a notable shift from his early pop catalog. Swag debuted at number two on the Billboard 200, racking up 163,000 equivalent album units its opening week, and its lead single Daisies became his 27th US top ten single, tying him with Janet Jackson on the all-time list. Swag has been streamed more than 198 million times and the buzz is carrying over to new business activity—his recent business insights and predictions for 2025 are trending on TikTok, while Diplo praised the Swag project's cutting-edge production on Billboard's Instagram news reel.Public appearances lately saw Justin keeping things low-key and family-focused, including a private album launch party in Los Angeles last week with close friends. Paparazzi trailed him and Hailey arriving at the Maybourne Hotel in Beverly Hills, noting his ultra-relaxed, signature streetwear look and his tendency to keep a distance from photographers—a likely lingering effect of his past run-ins with the press. On social media, he's been consistently active, mostly sharing intimate moments at home rather than promotional content.Business-wise, The Street recaps his diverse investments: after selling his entire music catalog to Hipgnosis for over 200 million dollars and stepping away from the Drew House streetwear brand, Bieber has been investing in tech and cryptocurrency ventures. Major headlines this week? Justin Bieber shares new family photos, keeps Swag album at the top of streaming charts, and continues to carefully balance fame with fiercely guarded privacy as both father and pop icon. No evidence of scandals, breakups, or major controversy—just a reinvigorated superstar playing out his next act on his own terms. Speculation about new tours or collaborations remains unconfirmed, but the buzz is that the next chapter could be his most significant yet.Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Estee gave up her career to become a full-time housewife—and proudly lets her husband make all the decisions. Critics say she's turning back the clock on women's rights. Supporters say she's redefining modern femininity. Dr. Phil sits down with Estee and her husband Conner to unpack the “tradwife” movement. Is it submission—or empowerment? Neha calls it a dangerous setback. Mara runs a company and can't imagine ever “submitting” to a man—let alone being one's wife. Conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey backs stay-at-home moms, but questions if tradwives are being honest. Meanwhile, Austin says he had to leave the U.S. to find a woman with traditional values. Is this trend a threat to feminism—or a radical form of it? Subscribe | Rate | Review | Share: YouTube: https://bit.ly/3H3lJ8n Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/4jVk6rX Spotify: https://bit.ly/4n6PCVZ Website: https://www.drphilpodcast.com  #Tradwife #TradwifeMovement #FeminismDebate #AntiFeminism? #DrPhil #StayAtHomeWife #WomenSupportingWomen #GirlBoss #HotTake #UnpopularOpinion #ControversialConvo #LetWomenChoose

[00:00:00] Eli Lake   [00:18:27] Allen West   [00:36:50] Kevin Roberts   [01:13:37] Paul Mauro   [01:32:01] Nina Teicholz Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

Andrew Walworth, Tom Bevan and Carl Cannon discuss Monday's mass shooting in midtown and its political impact of New York on the city's mayoral race. And, they discuss Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu disagreeing on the severity of the food crisis in Gaza. What has been the role of misleading and fake images in shaping public opinion? Then, they talk about a New York Times report that Harvard is the next Ivy League school to consider settling with the federal government over accusations of violating civil rights laws, one week after Columbia University agreed to pay $220 million to reinstate its federal grants and end investigations. Plus, they chat about the controversy over a new set of ads from American Eagle featuring actress Sydney Sweeney. Critics have denounced the ads for including what they see as racist dog whistles, while supporters say the commercials signal the “death of woke advertising”. And finally, Carl talks to former congressman Brad Carson, head of Americans for Responsible Innovation, about President Trump's “AI Action Plan” and how regulation of artificial intelligence will help shape America's future economy and security.

Critics are decrying the reorganization plan for USDA announced last week by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. NAFB News ServiceSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE on:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watchdog-on-wall-street-with-chris-markowski/id570687608 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2PtgPvJvqc2gkpGIkNMR5i WATCH and SUBSCRIBE on:https://www.youtube.com/@WatchdogOnWallstreet/featuredIn this episode of Watchdog on Wall Street, we dig into the proposed Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger that would create the first coast-to-coast rail monopoly in U.S. history. Supporters say it'll streamline shipping. Critics warn: higher prices, job losses, and a stranglehold on critical infrastructure.Here's what you'll hear:Why this $85 billion deal could reshape American transportationHow private monopolies lead to price hikes and weaker safety standardsWhy labor unions and major shippers are sounding the alarmHow autonomous trucking could disrupt the entire freight landscapeAnd why rail giants may be scrambling to survive the futureThis isn't just a merger—it's a power grab. And the stakes go far beyond the tracks.

As hunger reaches new levels in Gaza, society is on the brink of collapse. Even doctors are struggling to find the energy to treat patients without enough food themselves. At least 147 people have died of malnutrition, including 88 children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Medics have said that is probably an undercount. In recent months, more than 1,000 Palestinians have also been killed while waiting for aid distributed in Israeli-controlled combat zones.Israel has tightened its control of humanitarian aid going into Gaza in recent months to pressure Hamas. Israel has blamed Hamas for the crisis and its refusal to release the remaining hostages. The latest round of ceasefire talks involving the United States broke down last week. International pressure is mounting on Israel to lift its near total blockade on Gaza. President Donald Trump recently voiced concerns about the situation. Israel has started allowing more aid trucks in, and it resumed power to a critical water treatment plant. Critics worry about whether enough is being done. Today, host Colby Itkowitz speaks with Louisa Loveluck, a foreign correspondent for The Washington Post who has been reporting for months about the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and what the future holds. Today's show was produced by Rennie Svirnovskiy with help from Elana Gordon. It was edited by Maggie Penman and Erin Cunningham. It was mixed by Sean Carter. Subscribe to The Washington Post.

Hello and welcome to the Enchanted Ears Podcast, where we discuss anything and everything Disney. This week, Disney announced some more changes for Hollywood Studios. Plus Angela gets way too excited for popcorn buckets. Today, we're taking a look back at one of the biggest misfires in movie history - the 2015 version of Fantastic Four. What seemed like a promising movie, with a solid cast and rising director, ultimately failed to live up to even the lowest expectations. Critics hated it, fans hated it, no one went to see it.  But we wanted to know - was it really that bad? So we come to you this week, having watched it, with the details behind its demise and whether the Fantastic Four is worth your time. Submit a question/topic for us to discuss on a future episode. Don't forget to check us out on: -Instagram -Facebook  -Youtube Missing the smell of the parks? Check out Magic Candle Company and use code Enchanted at checkout to save 15% off your next order. Timestamps Welcome 00:00 Disney News 01:02 A Fantastic History 6:49 This Should Have Succeeded 16:02 But It Didn't 23:32 Fantastic Four Recap 25:05 Fantastic Four “Snyder Cut” 31:57 The Problem With the Ending 33:31 The Problem With the Rest of the Movie 38:45 How To Fix the Movie 44:59

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

Ghislaine Maxwell has repeatedly painted herself as a victim of circumstance, alleging that she was manipulated and coerced by Jeffrey Epstein—rather than acknowledging her own active role in his abuse network. In court filings and interviews, she claimed to have suffered under Epstein's influence, often suggesting that her privileged background and intelligence made her easy prey to his coercive control. Maxwell also described harsh pretrial incarceration conditions—complaining of being placed on suicide watch, denied basic comforts, and isolated—portraying herself as someone enduring mistreatment rather than someone who enabled it. Critics, however, see this narrative as a deflection: she's not expressing remorse but rather attempting to recast her identity from enabler to victim.Survivors, prosecutors, and journalists overwhelmingly reject Maxwell's self-victimization. As reporting emphasizes, Maxwell was not only a close confidante but the chief architect of many of Epstein's abuses—actively recruiting, grooming, and even participating in sexual misconduct with underage girls. Victims have described her as more manipulative than Epstein, noting that she preyed on their trust with charm, social status, and false promises. The narrative that she is merely a victim undermines their trauma and the clear weight of evidence demonstrating her culpability. It's seen not as accountability or contrition, but another attempt to soften her public image and elicit sympathy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8129617/Virginia-Giuffre-slams-sadistic-Ghislaine-Maxwell-playing-victim-card.html

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloud

Ghislaine Maxwell originally signaled she was ready to comply with the congressional subpoena demanding her testimony before the House Oversight Committee tentatively scheduled for the week of August 11. Her legal team had framed her cooperation with the Department of Justice—during a two‑day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, in which she reportedly answered questions about nearly 100 individuals without invoking privilege—as a sign of willingness to come forward fully. That earlier posture suggested Maxwell might walk the halls of Capitol Hill to finally provide insight into Epstein's network and operations.But following that DOJ sit‑down, she is now openly "undecided" about whether she will testify before Congress. Despite praising her own “truthful” and unrestricted cooperation in front of federal prosecutors, Maxwell has refused to commit to congressional testimony, leaving open the possibility of invoking her Fifth Amendment rights absent formal immunity. Critics are quick to suggest this move is a calculated pivot—falling back into legal limbo just as the political temperature rises. Rather than embracing transparency, she's pulling back into silence until she sees whether immunity or clemency might eventually materialize—casting further doubt on the sincerity of her earlier so-called "willingness."to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Maxwell's lawyer says she's undecided on appearing for congressional testimony - POLITICO

The U.S. economy is demonstrating resilience with strong consumer spending and low unemployment filings, despite looming inflation and tariff pressures. Retail sales rose by 0.6% in June, surpassing expectations and indicating solid growth in gross domestic product for the second quarter. However, concerns about rising import costs, which saw their largest monthly increase in over a year, continue to cast a shadow over the economic outlook. While manufacturers anticipate growth and increased hiring, the uncertainty surrounding tariffs remains a significant concern.IBM's CEO, Arvind Krishna, argues that fears of artificial intelligence (AI) eliminating jobs are exaggerated, suggesting that AI will actually enhance employment opportunities by increasing productivity. He notes that while some clerical roles may be phased out, new job creation will occur in programming and sales. Meanwhile, Gartner forecasts a substantial rise in global IT spending, projected to reach $5.43 trillion in 2025, driven largely by investments in AI infrastructure. This shift indicates a growing trend where companies must adapt to the changing landscape or risk being left behind.The podcast also discusses recent layoffs at major tech firms, including Microsoft, Tata Consultancy Services, and Intel, as they navigate the challenges posed by AI and automation. Microsoft has laid off approximately 9,000 employees while reporting significant revenue growth, highlighting the paradox of job cuts amid financial success. Similarly, TCS plans to cut 12,000 jobs, primarily affecting senior and mid-level positions, as clients demand AI-driven services and cost reductions. This trend underscores the rapid transformation of the workforce as companies pivot towards automation and higher-margin activities.Legislative updates include the Federal Communications Commission's review of state laws on AI, aimed at reducing regulations to promote American AI systems. Critics argue that this approach lacks a comprehensive vision for AI innovation. In the UK, a court has denied WhatsApp's intervention in a case involving Apple's compliance with government orders to access encrypted data, raising concerns about privacy. Additionally, New York has announced stricter cybersecurity regulations for water utilities, emphasizing the need for enhanced security measures in critical infrastructure. These developments reflect a broader struggle between regulatory frameworks and the fast-evolving tech landscape. Four things to know today 00:00 U.S. Economy Grows Steadily as AI Reshapes Labor and IT Spend Soars to $5.43 Trillion04:45 Global Policy Divide on AI and Cybersecurity Widens as U.S., UK, and New York Take Conflicting Regulatory Paths07:54 Layoffs Mount Across Tech and Services as AI Drives Shift Toward Margin, Not Manpower12:09 Intel Restructures for AI Future with Major Layoffs, Factory Slowdown, and Network Division Spinoff Supported by:  https://scalepad.com/dave/ https://businessof.tech/sponsor/moovila/  Tell us about a newsletter!https://bit.ly/biztechnewsletter All our Sponsors: https://businessof.tech/sponsors/ Do you want the show on your podcast app or the written versions of the stories? Subscribe to the Business of Tech: https://www.businessof.tech/subscribe/Looking for a link from the stories? The entire script of the show, with links to articles, are posted in each story on https://www.businessof.tech/ Support the show on Patreon: https://patreon.com/mspradio/ Want to be a guest on Business of Tech: Daily 10-Minute IT Services Insights? Send Dave Sobel a message on PodMatch, here: https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/businessoftech Want our stuff? Cool Merch? Wear “Why Do We Care?” - Visit https://mspradio.myspreadshop.com Follow us on:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079/YouTube: https://youtube.com/mspradio/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@businessoftechBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/businessof.tech

Ghislaine Maxwell has repeatedly painted herself as a victim of circumstance, alleging that she was manipulated and coerced by Jeffrey Epstein—rather than acknowledging her own active role in his abuse network. In court filings and interviews, she claimed to have suffered under Epstein's influence, often suggesting that her privileged background and intelligence made her easy prey to his coercive control. Maxwell also described harsh pretrial incarceration conditions—complaining of being placed on suicide watch, denied basic comforts, and isolated—portraying herself as someone enduring mistreatment rather than someone who enabled it. Critics, however, see this narrative as a deflection: she's not expressing remorse but rather attempting to recast her identity from enabler to victim.Survivors, prosecutors, and journalists overwhelmingly reject Maxwell's self-victimization. As reporting emphasizes, Maxwell was not only a close confidante but the chief architect of many of Epstein's abuses—actively recruiting, grooming, and even participating in sexual misconduct with underage girls. Victims have described her as more manipulative than Epstein, noting that she preyed on their trust with charm, social status, and false promises. The narrative that she is merely a victim undermines their trauma and the clear weight of evidence demonstrating her culpability. It's seen not as accountability or contrition, but another attempt to soften her public image and elicit sympathy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8129617/Virginia-Giuffre-slams-sadistic-Ghislaine-Maxwell-playing-victim-card.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Just two days before his death, Jeffrey Epstein signed a last will and testament placing more than $577 million in assets into a trust known as The 1953 Trust, named after his birth year. The will, filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, listed his extensive holdings, including cash, equities, hedge fund investments, and high-end real estate in Manhattan, Palm Beach, Paris, New Mexico, and the Caribbean. By moving his fortune into a trust, Epstein made it significantly harder for his victims or prosecutors to access the assets directly through legal action, shielding his wealth behind layers of privacy.The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comDisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a videotaped deposition taken in April 2016, Maxwell was questioned under oath about Giuffre's allegations of being groomed and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell—allegations that she vehemently denied, calling Giuffre an “absolute liar” and asserting she had no involvement in recruiting or abusing her. Maxwell repeatedly refused to answer questions about alleged sexual activity with minors—labeling them as inquiries into “consensual adult sex”—and insisted she had no knowledge of underage abuse. She denied any wrongdoing or participation in Epstein's trafficking network, attempting to distance herself from all aspects of Giuffre's claims.Critics and federal prosecutors later pointed to this deposition as a key piece of evidence in her criminal indictment: they argue Maxwell knowingly made false statements under oath, which became the basis for two counts of perjury in her 2021 criminal charges. Despite her denials, corroborating evidence—including testimony about threesomes with minor girls, flight logs, and recruitment patterns—cast serious doubt on her credibility. Giuffre's suit was ultimately settled in 2017, reportedly for millions of dollars, but the unsealed deposition—and Maxwell's fierce denials—now serve as a stark contrast to the weight of testimony and documentation later vetted in court.source:Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition Transcript - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Since Donald Trump's reelection, the Justice Department is undergoing a dramatic transformation. Once guided by norms of independence from the White House, the department now appears closely aligned with the president's personal agenda. NPR's Ayesha Rascoe and Justice Correspondent Ryan Lucas look at how Trump's new team—many of them his former personal attorneys—are reshaping the DOJ's mission, from the handling of specific prosecutions to sweeping changes in the Civil Rights Division. Critics call it the weaponization of justice; supporters say it's a long-overdue course correction.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Black Sabbath are solely responsible for conjuring the diabolical power of heavy metal. When guitarist Tony Iommi lost his fingertips as a teenager, he turned to a less painful style of playing— a style that produced a new, genre-defining type of gloom and heaviness. The band climbed through the seven circles of British podunk hell to international rock star success, but the lore of their dark imagery compelled the freaks to flood out of the woodwork and to their shows. Despite composing songs that warned against the evils of the occult, Black Sabbath attracted legions of devil worshippers, occultists and 1970s freak-flag-flying practitioners of the dark arts. Kids went mad for their metal. Critics hated it. And much to the band's dismay, Satanists found their battle cry in the heavy gloom that Black Sabbath had awakened. This episode was originally published on October 26, 2021. To see the full list of contributors, see the show notes at ⁠www.disgracelandpod.com⁠. To listen to Disgraceland ad free and get access to a monthly exclusive episode, weekly bonus content and more, become a Disgraceland All Access member at ⁠disgracelandpod.com/membership⁠. Sign up for our newsletter and get the inside dirt on events, merch and other awesomeness - ⁠GET THE NEWSLETTER⁠ Follow Jake and DISGRACELAND: ⁠Instagram⁠ ⁠YouTube⁠ ⁠X⁠ (formerly Twitter)  ⁠Facebook Fan Group⁠ ⁠TikTok To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It was marketed as a voyage for the boldest among us - a ticket to the bottom of the world, where only a handful of humans had ever dared to go. But what began as a high-tech adventure turned into an unthinkable tragedy, and at the center of it all was one man: Stockton Rush. He called it innovation. Critics called it recklessness. And five people would pay the ultimate price. In this series, we're diving deep into the story behind the Titan submersible disaster. From the birth of OceanGate and Stockton Rush's obsession with rewriting the rules of deep-sea exploration, to ignored warnings, missing safety certifications, and a catastrophic implosion that sent shockwaves across the globe. Who was Stockton Rush- visionary pioneer or dangerous idealist? What happened in the final hours of the Titan's descent? And how did a vessel built for discovery become a tomb in the dark silence of the Atlantic? This is not just a story about engineering failure; it's a story about ego, ambition, and the fatal cost of a man with a god complex who gambled with human lives in the name of legacy. We're coming to CrimeCon Denver! Use our code CRIMEWEEKLY for 10% off your tickets! https://www.crimecon.com/CC25 Try our coffee!! - www.CriminalCoffeeCo.com Become a Patreon member -- > https://www.patreon.com/CrimeWeekly Shop for your Crime Weekly gear here --> https://crimeweeklypodcast.com/shop Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CrimeWeeklyPodcast Website: CrimeWeeklyPodcast.com Instagram: @CrimeWeeklyPod Twitter: @CrimeWeeklyPod Facebook: @CrimeWeeklyPod ADS: 1. https://www.Smalls.com/CrimeWeekly - Get 60% off your first Smalls order PLUS free shipping! 2. https://www.HelixSleep.com/CrimeWeekly - Get 27% off sitewide! 3. https://www.PDSDebt.com/CrimeWeekly - Get your FREE debt assessment today! 4. https://www.EatIQBAR.com - Text WEEKLY to 64000 for 20% off ALL IQBAR products and FREE shipping!

Friday - Clark Stinks day! Christa shares Clark Stinks posts with Clark. Submit yours at Clark.com/ClarkStinks. Also in this episode, Clark discusses some unusual developments happening with air travel right now, including lower fares to Europe, and explains how reshopping advance bookings can save frequent flyers big money.   Clark Stinks: Segments 1 & 2 Airfares to Europe: Segment 3 Ask Clark: Segment 4 Mentioned on the show: 12 Things You Never Knew You Could Get From Your Local Library Transatlantic airfares slump as Europeans continue to shun travel to America It will soon be possible to fly for just $5, but with one condition, and it's not something you'll like.   How To Save on Travel With Google Flights Should I Tip on a Cruise?  /  Tipping on a cruise. What to do, what to expect Cheapest Way to Rent a Car: Expert Tips How To Dispute a Charge on Your Credit Card The Secret Technology Rental Car Companies Are Using Against You Clark.com resources Episode transcripts Community.Clark.com  /  Ask Clark Clark.com daily money newsletter Consumer Action Center Free Helpline: 636-492-5275 Learn more about your ad choices: megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Wednesday, President Trump signed three A.I.-related executive orders, and the White House released “America's A.I. Action Plan.” We break down what's in them, how the federal government intends to target “political bias” in chatbot output, and whether anyone will stand up against it. Then, do we hype up A.I. too much? Are we downplaying potential harms? We reached out to several prominent researchers and writers and asked for their critiques about how we cover A.I. For a limited time, you can get a special-edition “Hard Fork” hat when you purchase an annual New York Times Audio subscription for the first time. Get your hat at nytimes.com/hardforkhatGuests:Brian Merchant, author of the book and newsletter “Blood in the Machine”Alison Gopnik, professor at the University of California, BerkeleyRoss Douthat, New York Times opinion columnist and host of the podcast “Interesting Times”Claire Leibowicz, head of A.I. and media integrity at the Partnership on AIMax Read, author of the newsletter “Read Max”Additional Reading:Trump Plans to Give A.I. Developers a Free HandThe Chatbot Culture Wars Are Here We want to hear from you. Email us at hardfork@nytimes.com. Find “Hard Fork” on YouTube and TikTok.  Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Award-winning actress Jurnee Smollett is a veteran of the big and small screen, and she’s not even 40 yet! The actress started her career when she was still in diapers and won a Critics' Choice award by the time she was eleven years old. Now she’s turning up the heat with her new Apple TV+ crime drama, “Smoke.” No stranger to tackling complex roles, Jurnee joins Sophia to talk about playing a brilliant but troubled detective in her new show, including her prep and research, the behind-the-scenes process of creating a world for her character, and what it was like watching it in front of an audience for the first time! She also opens up about her divorce, early childhood acting experiences, overcoming major working mom guilt, and her relationship with her siblings. New episodes of “Smoke” drop every Friday on AppleTV+.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.