Fact Checking Darwin

Darwin demands that we disprove his theory–thats not how science works. Darwin’s Finches and the Peppered Moths experiments are attempts to prove Darwin’s theory of evolution but are embarrassing failures.

Darwin demands that we disprove his theory–thats not how science works. Darwin’s Finches and the Peppered Moths experiments are attempts […]

Evolution and Adaptations are two separate and distinct concepts often misused by Neo-Darwinists. The existence of over-engineered systems defeats Darwin's theory.

Evolution and Adaptations are two separate and distinct concepts often misused by Neo-Darwinists. The existence of over-engineered systems defeats Darwin's theory.

The Mitochondrial Eve Unit provides a unit of time in which no evolutionary changes occur, and demonstrates that the geological times we have to deal with are insufficient for Darwinian evolution.

The Mitochondrial Eve Unit provides a unit of time in which no evolutionary changes occur, and demonstrates that the geological times we have to deal with are insufficient for Darwinian evolution.

A fetus is created in a high pressure liquid environment, but will live in a low pressure gas environment. Three shunts in the heart allow this to happen. It is not possible that the DNA, which codes for these shunts, was created by the natural selection of random mutations.

A fetus is created in a high pressure liquid environment, but will live in a low pressure gas environment. Three […]

3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies and with a few examples from science authors including Richard Dawkins, Arthur Wallace, Georg Striedter and others, we see circular reasoning, ad hominem attacks, invalid arguments and arguments from authority.

3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies and with a few examples from science authors including Richard Dawkins, Arthur Wallace, […]

Darwinian literature is filled with logical fallacies. I wanted to have a discussion with a philosopher, but the responses were more logical fallacies

Darwinian literature is filled with logical fallacies. I wanted to have a discussion with a philosopher, but the responses were more logical fallacies

Darwinism—evolution by the natural selection of random mutations—is a failed 1800's theory, created with no knowledge of modern science. Neo-Darwinists, who allegedly understand modern science, are intrepidly attempting to resuscitate this moribund theory. Darwin started off on the wrong foot. He assumes organs evolve singularly. He uses the eye as an example of how optics can change slowly. But the eye is not a vision. Vision is the optics of an eye coupled with systems of muscles, nerves, arteries and extremely complex neuropathways and neurochemistry. Darwin and Neo-Darwinists ignore the fact that the human body is an astronomically complex collection of organs, systems, and networks all communicating and interdependent.

Darwinism—evolution by the natural selection of random mutations—is a failed 1800’s theory, created with no knowledge of modern science. Neo-Darwinists, who allegedly understand modern science, are intrepidly attempting to resuscitate this moribund theory. Darwin started off on the wrong foot. He assumes organs evolve singularly. He uses the eye as an example of how optics can change slowly. But the eye is not a vision. Vision is the optics of an eye coupled with systems of muscles, nerves, arteries and extremely complex neuropathways and neurochemistry. Darwin and Neo-Darwinists ignore the fact that the human body is an astronomically complex collection of organs, systems, and networks all communicating and interdependent.