Podcasts about hj res

We welcome Aaron back on the show as he recovers from his surgery.  We then hit on some current threats to the 2nd Amendment, how article 5 of the constitution provides remedies to the current derailment of our federal government, Aaron's pistol mods, Eric's shotgun improvements and much more.   Contact your congressman in regards to HJ Res. 44 https://www.house.gov/representatives Van Comp Shotgun Cards  https://www.vangcomp.com/product/spare-carrier/ Jack Carr's new book Only the Dead Mark Levin The Liberty Amendments  We welcome Aaron back on the show as he recovers from his  Intro and Outro Music by: The Tactical Twins, Jason Bieler and The Baron Von Bielski Orchestra and Tim Alexander/Fata Morgana Please subscribe and share our podcast with friends and family.  Visit our website for bios, future events and info at www.evosec.org  Like, follow and share us on Facebook and Instagram @evosecusa WE ARE PUMPED TO HAVE A NEW AFFILIATE LINK FOR ORIGIN AND JOCKO FUEL!!!  Help support this show by purchasing any of your JiuJitsu gear, Jocko Supplements, books clothing and more... link below. Origin/Jocko Fuel – Bringing back American manufacturing, producing the best Jiu-Jitsu Gis on the market, Jeans, rash guards, and world class supplements to help you on the path.  Use EvoSec10 at checkout for 10% off, this helps us greatly.  EVOSEC Originusa.com AFFILIATE LINK Tenicor – www.tenicor.com they are educators, and innovators in the holster market.  They are firearms instructors themselves, pressure testing their gear in multiple force on force events every year.  We support those who do the work.   Again, patronizing our sponsors helps us greatly. 

This is an intermediate episode clarifying some things said on the previous podcast episode with a guest and our mention of Noahide Law. In the episode I stated the wrong title. I said HR104. Then corrected it to HJ Res. 104. We also stated that the action was not law. Upon further investigation, I found it considered public law under Public Law No. 102-14. So I stand corrected. In this clarification I state the appearance of the law as to recognize observance of Education Day in honor of Rabbi Schneerson, with a mention of Noahide as an ethical standard. In I don't see an enforcement of it, but certainly a consideration for International example. Does this mean persecution for the Christian saints? It could. But regardless of Noahide, genocide could be taken freely by the Elite and their forces at any time they desire. In the hands of the antichrist. But only when God allows.Here is the lawhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-joint-resolution/104/textSee this episode on videohttps://youtu.be/iLPPs44PBvg

This is an intermediate episode clarifying some things said on the previous podcast episode with a guest and our mention of Noahide Law. In the episode I stated the wrong title. I said HR104. Then corrected it to HJ Res. 104. We also stated that the action was not law. Upon further investigation, I found it considered public law under Public Law No. 102-14. So I stand corrected. In this clarification I state the appearance of the law as to recognize observance of Education Day in honor of Rabbi Schneerson, with a mention of Noahide as an ethical standard. In I don't see an enforcement of it, but certainly a consideration for International example. Does this mean persecution for the Christian saints? It could. But regardless of Noahide, genocide could be taken freely by the Elite and their forces at any time they desire. In the hands of the antichrist. But only when God allows.Here is the lawhttps://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-joint-resolution/104/textSee this episode on videohttps://youtu.be/iLPPs44PBvg

Listen in this month as we review currently endorsed legislation (S 123/HR 12, HR 280 and HR 281, and HJ Res 44), legislation under consideration (S 2516 and HR 148), and candidate endorsements of Eliott Faucz and Tate McCall.

The right to vote is the foundation of any democracy, yet the Supreme Court has just struck down a central provision of the Voting Rights Act. Unlike the citizens of all but 11 nations, Americans do not have an explicit right to vote in their constitution. Congressman Mark Pocan is a lead sponsor of HJ Res. 44 in the U.S. House of Representatives to strengthen the claims of all citizens to exercise their suffrage rights. American cities have also begun to consider resolutions to support a constitutional right to vote and changes designed to promote, protect and expand voting. What would a right to vote in the Constitution mean for particular voting rights struggles? How would it affect the future of the Voting Rights Act and voting rights for the people of Washington, D.C.? Congressman Pocan will make the case for an explicit right to vote in the Constitution. Discussing what the amendment may mean for enhancing a voting rights movement are Washington Correspondent for The Nation John Nichols, Advancement Project co-director Judith Browne Dianis and Color of Change executive director Rashad Robinson. Takoma Park city councilor Tim Male and FairVote's PromoteOurVote.com director Patricia Hart will outline one strategy launched at a local level that holds promise for a realistic roadmap for reform. Mark Schmitt, Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute moderated the discussion. Held at NYU DC

The right to vote is the foundation of any democracy, yet the Supreme Court has just struck down a central provision of the Voting Rights Act. Unlike the citizens of all but 11 nations, Americans do not have an explicit right to vote in their constitution. Congressman Mark Pocan is a lead sponsor of HJ Res. 44 in the U.S. House of Representatives to strengthen the claims of all citizens to exercise their suffrage rights. American cities have also begun to consider resolutions to support a constitutional right to vote and changes designed to promote, protect and expand voting. What would a right to vote in the Constitution mean for particular voting rights struggles? How would it affect the future of the Voting Rights Act and voting rights for the people of Washington, D.C.? Congressman Pocan will make the case for an explicit right to vote in the Constitution. Discussing what the amendment may mean for enhancing a voting rights movement are Washington Correspondent for The Nation John Nichols, Advancement Project co-director Judith Browne Dianis and Color of Change executive director Rashad Robinson. Takoma Park city councilor Tim Male and FairVote's PromoteOurVote.com director Patricia Hart will outline one strategy launched at a local level that holds promise for a realistic roadmap for reform. Mark Schmitt, Senior Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute moderated the discussion. Held at NYU DC