Podcast appearances and mentions of Miller V California

I read this ordinance on https://www.franklinlegal.net and discuss its ramifications here. I reference the Nolo book Legal Research: How to Find and Understand the Law. I reference the U.S. Supreme Court Case Miller v. California (413 U.S. 15). --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/FreePressMediaPressInc./support

On June 21, 1932, the landmark SCOTUS ruling in Miller v. California redefined what makes something legally obscene. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Julia Sugarbaker takes on her most formidable opponent yet: the U.S. Constitution! Is pornography protected under free speech? Is it obscenity, or capitalism, or both? And what does TROOP BEVERLY HILLS have to do with any of this? Join your hosts, the women of Sugarbaker and Associates, Anthony, and a very aggrieved newsman in our Season 3 finale to find out! Show: DESIGNING WOMEN “Julia Drives Over the First Amendment,” Season 3, Episode 22 Air Date: May 22, 1989 Find it: on Hulu Snack: Trader Joe’s Peanut Butter Filled Pretzel Nuggets Further Reading: Joe Coulombe, Who Founded Trader Joe’s, Dies at 89 | New York Times Miller v. California | Wikipedia Pornography has deeply troubling effects on young people, but there are ways we can minimise the harm | The Conversation How to be an ethical porn consumer in nine easy steps | Independent 7 Things the First Amendment Doesn’t Protect

Marvin Miller was convicted of violating California’s criminal obscenity law when he sent unsolicited mailings advertising the availability of some dirty books and a movie. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld his conviction. This is one of several cases from this era where the Court struggled to define the limits of free speech under the First Amendment. The post The Law episode 57: Miller v. California appeared first on Speakeasy Ideas.