Podcasts about legal

With a landmark court case in California hearing from a woman who says tech giants Meta and YouTube's owner Google harmed her mental health as a child, we catch up with our correspondent in Los Angeles, Peter Bowes, on the legal proceedings and discuss how damaging and addictive social media websites can be during a person's formative years. Elsewhere, as Netflix squabbles with Paramount for control of Warner Brothers Discovery and its worldwide franchises including Harry Potter and Superman, we hear from former Paramount executive Guy Petty on why Netflix's CEO Ted Sarandos is heading to the White House. Rahul Tandon speaks to Moritz Riesinger of the IG Metall union in Germany as it comes to a temporary agreement with Elon Musk over its Tesla factory near Berlin. And economist Cary Leahey of Columbia University explains why the latest unemployment figures in the United States has risen once again.Global business news, with live guests and contributions from Europe, Latin America and the USA. (Picture: Supporters of plaintiff Kaley G.M. hold signs as they stand outside the courthouse in Los Angeles, California, on the day she takes the stand at a trial in a key test case accusing Meta and Google's YouTube of harming children's mental health through addictive social media platforms. Credit: Reuters / Mike Blake.)

As February comes to a close, Trey tackles questions on the case that gripped the nation: the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. He discusses the jurisdictional limits of the FBI in local cases and the constitutional necessity of the Grand Jury, breaking down how the justice system actually functions versus how it's often perceived. Plus, Trey shares an exclusive update on the highly-anticipated sequel to his debut novel The Color of Death! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, we delve into the ongoing fallout from Hillary Clinton's deposition regarding her knowledge of her husband's ties to Jeffrey Epstein. As Clinton faces scrutiny, we highlight a surprising incident involving Congresswoman Lauren Boebert that adds an unexpected twist to the day's events.Shifting focus, we break down a significant scoop involving Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, revealing her close coordination with the Biden White House and the January 6th committee. Solomon discusses the implications of this alleged political collusion and the potential for double jeopardy as Trump faces charges on multiple fronts.Joining us are key voices in the conversation, starting with Chairman Barry Loudermilk of the House select subcommittee on January 6th, who shares insights on the investigation's trajectory. Legal analyst Mike Davis follows, providing his perspective on the legal ramifications of these developments.To wrap up the episode, Congressman Mark Harris from North Carolina discusses the real-life consequences of policy failures and the importance of remembering victims of crime. He emphasizes the stark difference between patriotism and hatred, a theme that will resonate as the 2026 election approaches.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On February 12, the Environmental Protection Agency dealt a major blow to the government's power to fight climate change by rescinding a key piece of research called the endangerment finding. The finding, issued in 2009, basically says: Greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare—and because they're harmful, they must be regulated. It's the legal basis for the federal government's regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. So what does it mean that this finding has been thrown out? Host Flora Lichtman digs into this question with Andy Miller, an original author on the endangerment finding who spent more than 30 years working for the EPA. Guest: Dr. Andy Miller worked on air pollution and climate change at the EPA for more than 30 years. He was an original author on Endangerment Finding. Transcripts for each episode are available within 1-3 days at sciencefriday.com. Subscribe to this podcast. Plus, to stay updated on all things science, sign up for Science Friday's newsletters.

In case you're worried that the federal courts - the federal judges - are weakening in their resolved to hold Donald Trump and his flunkies accountable for their lawlessness and unconstitutional conduct, a federal judge of more than 30 years has said that, regarding masked federal agents roaming the street of American cities: "An anonymous government is no government at all." Longtime federal judge, Joseph Goodwin, excoriated the Trump administration for sending masked agents into the streets of American cities to deprive people of their 4th Amendment right against an unreasonable searches and seizures and their 5th Amendment right to due process of law.The courts continue to be points of light – beacons of light – amidst the Trump-induced darkness.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Send a textThis Daily Drop is all movement, no filler.The Army is doubling down on its auction-style warrant officer retention bonus experiment. Market-driven talent management? Maybe. Hunger Games for CW5s? Also maybe. At the same time, lessons from Ukraine are reshaping armored warfare training, drone integration, and electronic warfare acquisition speed.The Navy installs a new Submarine Force Atlantic commander and rehearses an anti-ship strike with a B-2 off California. Targeting ships at sea isn't the same as dropping bombs on dirt—and that joint integration matters.The Air Force mobility enterprise is waving red flags. Aging tankers and airlift fleets aren't getting replaced fast enough, and timelines stretching into the 2030s aren't comforting. Meanwhile, Reserve and Guard leaders are pushing for equal benefits when serving identical missions.Space Force pauses Vulcan rocket launches over an anomaly—national security missions now in holding.And at the policy level, legal tension continues over military speech and disciplinary authority.A lot moving. A lot worth watching.⏱️ Timestamps: 00:00 Intro and sponsor 02:00 Warrant officer retention bonus auction system 04:30 Ukraine armored warfare lessons 06:30 Electronic warfare acquisition overhaul 08:30 New Submarine Force Atlantic commander 10:00 B-2 and Navy anti-ship strike rehearsal 12:30 Mobility fleet modernization concerns 15:00 Equal benefits push for Guard and Reserve 17:30 Space Force Vulcan rocket launch pause 19:00 Legal dispute over military speech limits

It's Quibi Time (tm) with Jenessa! (Don't worry, I'll explain...) It's 2 debunks for the price of 1, or actually 5 debunks for the price of 2, because this is a two-parter! Here are the first two: AI girlfriend Caramela, S. (2025, January 31). Most Men Would Marry Their AI Girlfriend if it were Legal. Vice. Fiorillo, C. & Bartlett, S. (2025, January 28). AI girlfriends could be a thing of the future as men admit they would marry robot lovers. The Mirror. Koetsier, J. (2025, April 29). 80% Of Gen Zers Would Marry An AI: Study. Forbes. Mashable. (2025, May 22). Majority of Gen Z would marry an AI, survey says. Yahoo!Life. (2025, May 11). GenZ Believes They Could Marry AI, Replace Human Connections: Report. NDTV World. Ulanoff, L. (2025, May 22). Would you marry an AI? A recent survey says most Gen Z-ers would - here's why that's a ridiculous idea. Techradar. Texas voter registration (2025, August 7). Texas. Independent Voter Project. (Thomas saw this viral Reddit post about it) Texas by the Numbers. L2. January 2025 Voter Registration Figures. Texas Secretary of State. Turnout and Voter Registration Figures (1970 - current). Texas Secretary of State. Are you an expert in something and want to be on the show? Apply here!  

Unpacking the regulatory path forward for prediction markets with Coinbase Litigation Head Ryan VanGrack. Coinbase's VP of Legal and Global Head of Litigation, Ryan VanGrack, joins Jennifer Sanasie and Renato Mariotti to discuss why the company is challenging state regulators to ensure a unified federal framework for prediction markets. He also shares why he believes bipartisan market structure legislation is still on the table despite recent setbacks. - Timestamps: 01:10 - The CFTC's Response to Kalshi's Insider Trading Accusations02:38 - Why Coinbase is Suing the States03:41 - Prediction Markets vs. Sports Betting08:14 - The States Are "Gaslighting" the Public on Prediction Markets11:31 - Is Market Structure Still Possible?15:58 - Addressing Concerns About Coinbase's Role in Stalled Market Structure Legislation - This episode was hosted by Jennifer Sanasie and Renato Mariotti .

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Eric Richins suspected his wife was trying to kill him. He reportedly told friends. He told family. He consulted divorce lawyers and estate planners. He removed Kouri from his life insurance policy. He transferred business assets to a trust controlled by his sister.He took precautions. He didn't take the final step. He stayed.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins True Crime Today to analyze the psychology that keeps victims in dangerous relationships. This isn't about blaming Eric—it's about understanding forces most people never encounter.Suspecting your spouse wants you dead isn't comparable to other marital suspicions. It's existential. It requires accepting that the person you share a bed with, the parent of your children, could end your life. The human mind fights that conclusion with everything it has.We examine the protective measures Eric reportedly took while staying married. Legal consultations. Insurance changes. Asset transfers. He wasn't ignoring the threat—he was preparing for it. But defensive measures without leaving meant staying within reach.We analyze the isolation of an unbelievable suspicion. "I think my wife is poisoning me" sounds like paranoia to outsiders. How do you get help when your truth sounds like delusion?We discuss how children factor in. Eric and Kouri had three kids together. Does that keep victims close? Make leaving harder? Create a need to monitor the threat?And we identify warning signs others should recognize. What behaviors suggest someone you know might be in real danger from a partner? What should you do?Part 2 of a two-part series. Essential for anyone who might see themselves in Eric's situation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#EricRichins #KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #VictimPsychology #WhyVictimsStay #ShavaunScott #DomesticViolence #PoisoningVictim #PartnerAbuse

The Tim Conway Jr. Show Hour (2.25) Conway breaks down the hazmat response and FBI investigation sparked by suspicious items found at an Irvine home, plus a high-speed stolen vehicle chase tearing through the Norwalk and Cerritos area. Meanwhile, a local couple turns their kitchen into a buzzing coffee hotspot thanks to a new Los Angeles County program—just as Bellio’s secret about selling food from home comes out! The show also dives into the newly announced Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominees, including Shakira, The Black Crowes, Jeff Buckley, Billy Idol, and Pink, plus practical tips on keeping ice from flying off your car—and Stef “The Foosh” embraces his serial dating era!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta delivers expert analysis on three high-profile cases: the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation stalling at day 23, the Kouri Richins murder trial in week one, and the Colin Gray prosecution that could reshape parental liability law.The Guthrie case has problems. Four hundred investigators, forty thousand tips—no arrest. DNA evidence stuck for potentially a year. Sources say the investigation is scaling back. Bob breaks down what that signals and how a defense attorney would exploit every weakness.The Richins trial is underway with powerful evidence on both sides. Carmen Lauber—the housekeeper who claims she sold Kouri fentanyl—has immunity, but her supplier recanted. Eric's friends will testify he said "I think my wife tried to poison me" eighteen days before his death. The 15-minute gap before the 911 call. The orange notebook. Bob analyzes where this case will be won or lost.The Colin Gray prosecution is precedent-setting. Second-degree murder instead of manslaughter. 180 years versus the Crumbleys' 10-15. The FBI warned him in May 2023. Body cam shows "God, I knew it." Georgia has no safe storage law—so the underlying conduct was legal. Bob explains how you charge murder anyway and whether this opens the floodgates for parental prosecutions nationwide.Karen McDonald—the Crumbley prosecutor—said her reaction to Colin Gray being charged was "rage." She never meant to create this.Three cases representing the full spectrum of criminal defense challenges: a stalled investigation, a trial hinging on compromised witnesses, and a prosecution pushing legal boundaries.Bob Motta's expert breakdown of what's really happening.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BobMotta #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #ColinGray #HiddenKillers #DefenseAttorney #LegalAnalysis #ParentalLiability #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime

Tara breaks down explosive revelations from the State of the Union and recent investigations. FBI surveillance reportedly targeted White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Kash Patel, and over 1,200 political figures, journalists, and clergy — many without evidence of a crime. Ten FBI employees have been fired so far, with more potentially to come. Former Obama adviser Susan Rice allegedly warned corporate leaders that political consequences could follow future power shifts — sparking moves by tech giants and CEOs to Florida for legal protection. Tara also highlights Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile ambitions, warning of the potential threat to U.S. bases and allies in Europe and the Middle East, and the risks of assassination attempts targeting U.S. political figures. Plus, insights on the Future Scholar program for South Carolina residents — a tax-smart way to save for K-12, college, and certifications. A packed episode covering domestic surveillance, geopolitical danger, and financial strategies Americans are overlooking.

Have you stopped to consider the number of lies Democrats tell themselves?It's enormous.I don't know how they live themselves, except to say they're scared to leave the cult.Blatant lies.Covid. Vaccine effectiveness. Masks. Etc.Guns. Border policy. 2020 election. 2022 midterms. J6.The strangest thing about the hypothetical was not the shouting. It was the silence.At precisely midnight, something shifted. No executive order. No Supreme Court ruling. No viral hashtag. Just an inexplicable civic condition: every Democrat in America, from city council to Capitol Hill, suddenly lost the ability to lie.Not exaggerate. Not deflect. Not rebrand. Lie.By sunrise, the cable news studios looked like aquariums after someone forgot to oxygenate the tank. Pundits opened their mouths with the usual choreography, but what came out was unfiltered oxygen. Raw. Bracing. Occasionally fatal to reputations.The first hearings convened before breakfast.A senior Democrat, long fond of describing January 6 as an existential threat on par with Pearl Harbor and 9/11, leaned toward the microphone and admitted that while the riot was disgraceful, the apocalyptic rhetoric proved politically invaluable. It unified a fractured caucus. It redirected scrutiny away from pandemic policy failures. It froze debate. “Most secure election in history,” another repeated, before clarifying that security and public confidence are not synonyms, particularly after states rewrote voting procedures under emergency authority while private actors poured hundreds of millions into local election administration.He even cited the now well documented “Zuckerberg grants,” the $419 million channeled through the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a figure reported widely in 2021 and dissected in state legislatures thereafter. What had once been framed as “philanthropy” was now described, under duress of honesty, as asymmetrical infrastructure. Legal, perhaps. Neutral, not exactly.Then the conversation pivoted to COVID.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In a recent episode of the award-winning Consumer Finance Monitor podcast, Alan Kaplinsky was joined by Nick Bourke, Kate Griffin, and Ballard Spahr partner Joseph Schuster to discuss a groundbreaking new report from the Aspen Institute Financial Security Program: United We Stand: A National Strategy to Prevent Scams. The episode builds on Nick and Kate's prior appearance on the podcast last July, when the report was still in development. Now finalized, the report offers one of the most comprehensive frameworks to date for addressing what has become a systemic threat to American households and the broader financial system. The Scope of the Problem: A Systemic Threat Frauds and scams are no longer isolated consumer protection issues. According to the report, U.S. households are losing an estimated $196 billion annually to scams — roughly $1 billion every couple of days. One in five American adults reports having lost money to an online scam. As Nick Bourke explained, today's scams are: ·                 Technology-enabled ·                 Highly organized and industrialized ·                 Often operated by transnational criminal organizations ·                 Accelerating due to AI and faster payment systems The so-called scam "lifecycle" includes four stages: 1.     Lead – Hooking the victim 2.     Deceive – Building trust (often through impersonation or relationship-building) 3.     Bleed – Extracting funds 4.     Clean – Laundering proceeds, often through cryptocurrency or offshore channels Different sectors see only fragments of this lifecycle; social media platforms may see the "lead," financial institutions the "bleed," and law enforcement the "clean." That fragmentation allows criminals to scale operations while defenders remain siloed. Why Scams Are Rising Despite Heavy Investment As Kate Griffin noted, industry and government are investing heavily in prevention. Yet scams continue to grow. Why? ·                 Fragmentation across sectors: No single actor sees the entire attack sequence. ·                 Outdated reporting infrastructure: Federal systems at agencies like the FBI and FTC remain manual and technologically antiquated. ·                 Regulatory uncertainty: Financial institutions and technology platforms face unclear expectations about what data they can use and share. ·                 Speed of modern payments: Faster money movement means faster losses. Joseph Schuster emphasized that many financial institutions are strongly incentivized to prevent fraud as they often bear reputational and financial risk when scams succeed. But legal ambiguity, especially under statutes like the Fair Credit Reporting Act, can chill data-sharing and innovation. Core Recommendations from the Aspen Report The report outlines both high-level national reforms and granular operational improvements with more than 180 specific ideas. 1. Elevate Scam Prevention to a National Priority The report calls for: ·                 A designated federal lead (or "czar") to coordinate strategy ·                 A whole-of-government approach ·                 Clear national goals and metrics Without centralized leadership, enforcement and regulatory actions remain fragmented.  2. Modernize Law Enforcement Reporting Systems Federal reporting portals, including Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), the FBI's complaint systems, and the FTC's databases, require modernization. The report recommends: ·                 Streamlined, automated reporting ·                 Backend data interoperability across agencies ·                 Advanced analytics and AI tools for enforcement 3. Establish Clear Duties to Act Paired with Safe Harbors One of the most important themes discussed was the need for: ·                 Clear expectations for banks, telecom companies, and digital platforms ·                 Safe harbors that protect companies when sharing scam intelligence in good faith Countries like Australia have already codified such frameworks. The U.S. has yet to establish similarly coordinated standards. 4. Build a Cross-Sector Information-Sharing Ecosystem Effective scam prevention requires: ·                 Exchange of scam indicators (malicious URLs, compromised phone numbers, device patterns) ·                 Interoperable information-sharing platforms ·                 Privacy-preserving architecture ·                 Legal clarity to mitigate antitrust and consumer reporting concerns Joseph noted that industry appetite for collaboration is strong but clarity and guardrails are essential. 5. Consider a U.S. National Anti-Scam Center The report explores the idea of a centralized "front door", potentially something like stopscams.gov, that would: ·                 Serve as a national reporting hub ·                 Provide victim resources ·                 Facilitate coordination among law enforcement ·                 Support public education campaigns Social Media and Platform Responsibility The discussion also addressed the evolving role of digital platforms. Scam activity frequently originates through: ·                 Paid advertisements ·                 Dating applications ·                 Direct messaging ·                 Fake investment websites Compared to banks, social media companies operate within a less clearly defined regulatory structure. Courts are increasingly developing theories of "platform liability," but statutory clarity is lacking. The report urges policymakers to define reasonable expectations for platforms — paired with safe harbors and practical tools that empower prevention rather than merely assign blame. What Happens Next? The key question: who implements this strategy? Kate Griffin emphasized that this is a whole-of-society problem requiring coordinated action by: ·                 Federal leadership ·                 Congress ·                 Financial institutions ·                 Telecom and digital platforms ·                 Law enforcement ·                 Civil society There have been encouraging developments, including: ·                 Treasury and State Department sanctions targeting transnational scam networks ·                 A joint DOJ–FBI–Secret Service initiative targeting Southeast Asian scam operations o   But much more remains to be done. Nick Bourke suggested that, one year from now, real success would include: ·                 A designated federal anti-scam lead ·                 A congressional commission ·                 Measurable national prevention goals ·                 Corporate adoption of formalized anti-scam strategies Joseph Schuster added that industry innovation is ongoing, particularly in artificial intelligence, biometrics, and authentication, but warned that fragmented state-level regulation could complicate progress. Key Takeaways Alan Kaplinsky closed the episode with several important observations: ·                 Fraud and scams are now a systemic threat, not a niche compliance issue. ·                 Prevention, not just reimbursement, must be the organizing principle. ·                 Coordination matters as much as authority. ·                 Good-faith companies need regulatory clarity, not just enforcement pressure. ·                 Reducing scams strengthens trust in the U.S. financial system and digital economy. The Aspen report reframes the debate. Rather than assigning blame, it calls for aligned incentives, shared responsibility, and coordinated national action. If the title of the report, United We Stand, becomes reality, the United States may finally begin to bend the curve on one of the most costly and fast-growing threats facing consumers today. For more insights on consumer financial services developments, visit Ballard Spahr's Consumer Finance Monitor blog and explore the full Aspen Institute report here. Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

Advocates are scrambling to raise money for rent for the families that are still in hiding and losing income due to the Minnesota ICE surge. A coalition of unions in Minnesota is calling for a rent strike in solidarity with those families starting March 1. Others are asking Governor Tim Walz to enact an eviction moratorium and rent relief payments for people unable to work during the surge of federal agents in the state. Advocates said they have crowdsourced hundreds of thousands of dollars to support the people in hiding, but that it is not sustainable for the long term. Gov. Walz said he can't enact a statewide eviction moratorium without declaring a peacetime emergency. So far, he has been unwilling to make that move. Professor Larry Jacobs, the founder and director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, broke down the legal and political considerations facing the governor around an eviction moratorium.

In case you're worried that the federal courts - the federal judges - are weakening in their resolved to hold Donald Trump and his flunkies accountable for their lawlessness and unconstitutional conduct, a federal judge of more than 30 years has said that, regarding masked federal agents roaming the street of American cities: "An anonymous government is no government at all." Longtime federal judge, Joseph Goodwin, excoriated the Trump administration for sending masked agents into the streets of American cities to deprive people of their 4th Amendment right against an unreasonable searches and seizures and their 5th Amendment right to due process of law.The courts continue to be points of light – beacons of light – amidst the Trump-induced darkness.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode, Maddy Roche and Bri Conn, CFP®, explain why legal documents alone aren't enough. Estate plans grant authority. Care plans provide direction. They spell out the details that make real-world care possible: where to find your mailbox key, your alarm code, how to feed your pets, what medical history your doctors should know, and what living with dignity truly means to you.They also discuss documenting cultural or religious preferences and why these plans should be treated as living documents, updated as your life, relationships, and values evolve.Key Takeaways:Estate plans give the who, care plans give the how. Legal documents grant someone the power to make decisions. Care plans outline what those decisions should actually look like, from daily routines to end-of-life wishes.Document the everyday details others wouldn't know. Alarm codes, mailbox locations, pet feeding routines, storage facilities, and where to find important items are all critical for someone stepping into your life.Define what life with dignity means to you. Cultural preferences, religious practices, LGBTQ+ identity, and personal boundaries should be clearly stated so your wishes are honored, not someone else's assumptions.Build a team to support you as you age. Financial planners, doctors, and aging care managers all play a role in ensuring your care plan can actually be executed when you need it.Treat your care plan as a living document. Update it as your life changes. New pet, new home, new diagnosis, new preferences. The goal is to keep it current so it reflects who you are now.Episode Hosts:Maddy Roche - Chief Growth Officer at Childfree Trust® and responsible for all sales & marketing initiatives.Bri Conn, CFP® - Customer Experience Manager at Childfree Trust®. Bri coaches clients through estate planning and care plan development, helping them document their wishes and build support teams.About Childfree InsightsChildfree Insights is a trusted resource for life planning without children. It explores financial planning, estate planning, relationships, and long-term decisions for adults building a future without kids. Home of Childfree Wealth® and Childfree Trust®.Connect with Us: Ready to work on building better financial habits? Connect with our financial planning team at childfreewealth.com or learn more about estate planning at childfreetrust.com. Follow Childfree Life by Design on your favorite podcast platform and join the conversation on social media: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/childfreeinsightsFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ChildfreeInsights/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/childfreeinsightsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ChildfreeInsights Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational & entertainment purposes. Please consult your advisor before implementing any ideas heard on this podcast.

A lawyer representing a woman who says she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein has publicly stated that Prince Andrew should be “very concerned” about new allegations linked to Epstein's sex-trafficking network. The attorney, who has represented several Epstein survivors, pointed to court documents and depositions that describe the accuser's claims that she was trafficked by Epstein and forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including the former prince, while she was underage. The lawyer urged Andrew to cooperate fully with authorities rather than continue to deny the accusations, suggesting that his past statements and resistance to submitting testimony have raised serious legal concerns.These remarks come amid broader scrutiny of Andrew's ties to Epstein and continuing legal pressure from survivors' attorneys. Although Andrew has consistently denied involvement in any illegal conduct and previously settled a civil lawsuit with one of Epstein's accusers without admitting guilt, the lawyer's comments underscore the ongoing tension between the former royal's public denials and the detailed allegations surfaced in litigation and public filings. The situation reflects the enduring fallout from Epstein's network and the continuing efforts by victims and their representatives to seek accountability from those they say were part of or enabled his abuses.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew could be held 'criminally liable for sex trafficking after introducing abuse victim to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell', lawyer claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Are the Epstein files creeping closer to Donald Trump and other rich, powerful, influential, privileged people? Well, look at what happened to the person formerly known as Prince Andrew.Once a criminal gets caught in the grips of the rule of law - things often start to happen. Being arrested and facing the prospect of prosecution for your crimes tends to have a way of focusing the mind on one thing in particular: 'how in the hell do I get out of this jam? What can I do to save myself?' One of the things criminals do is begin to tell law enforcement authorities about the crimes of others in hopes of reducing their own charges or criminal exposure.What might Former Prince Andrew and other influential people who are being criminally investigated in countries around the world do with information they might have about the crimes of OTHER influential people? What might they do to try to save themselves? Are the Epstein walls finally closing in on Donald Trump?Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Supreme Court heard the long-awaited case on the legality of President Donald Trump's tariffs, and its decision fell somewhere in the middle. Trump is now expanding the tariffs using other methods. Yet now, there are also questions of whether America could be forced to pay back money from the tariffs.We'll discuss this topic and others in this episode of Crossroads.Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

The hosts spotlight Alpha Schools' exponential leap: AI mastery academics in 2 hours daily - top 1% SATs - plus life skills workshops to thrive in an AI world. With CEO Mackenzie Price and principal Joe Lamont, they dismantle failing systems for a 10X future. Get access to metatrends 10+ years before anyone else - https://qr.diamandis.com/metatrends   Learn about Alpha School: https://alpha.school/  Peter H. Diamandis, MD, is the Founder of XPRIZE, Singularity University, ZeroG, and A360 MacKenzie Price is the co-founder of Alpha School Joe Liemandt is principal at Alpha School Salim Ismail is the founder of OpenExO Dave Blundin is the founder & GP of Link Ventures Dr. Alexander Wissner-Gross is a computer scientist and founder of Reified – My companies: Apply to Dave's and my new fund:https://qr.diamandis.com/linkventureslanding      Go to Blitzy to book a free demo and start building today: https://qr.diamandis.com/blitzy   _ Connect with Peter: X Instagram Connect with Dave: X LinkedIn Connect with Salim: X Join Salim's Workshop to build your ExO  Connect with Alex Website LinkedIn X Email Substack  Spotify Threads Connect with McKenzie X Instagram Linkedin Connect with Joe X  Linkedin Listen to MOONSHOTS: Apple YouTube – *Recorded on December 9th, 2025 *The views expressed by me and all guests are personal opinions and do not constitute Financial, Medical, or Legal advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Georgia has no safe storage law. A 14-year-old can legally possess a long gun. Colin Gray didn't technically break any gun laws by giving his son an AR-15 for Christmas. So how is he now facing 180 years on second-degree murder charges?Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down the legal strategy prosecutors are using against Colin Gray—and whether it can survive scrutiny.The facts are bad. The FBI visited Colin Gray's home in May 2023 after his son made threats on Discord. Body cam footage shows Gray telling deputies "God, I knew it" within minutes of the Apalachee High School shooting. He also said he'd been trying to get his son into counseling. Bob analyzes how those statements play with a jury—and whether they're admission of knowledge or a father's horror.The Crumbleys set a precedent in Michigan with manslaughter convictions—10 to 15 years each. Georgia went further with second-degree murder. Colin Gray faces 180 years. That gap shows how Georgia views this case—and what it could mean for parents nationwide.Karen McDonald—the prosecutor who got the Crumbley convictions—said her reaction to Colin Gray being charged was "rage." She said the Crumbley case was never meant to open the floodgates. Legal experts warn this precedent could be applied unevenly, potentially disproportionately against families without resources. Bob addresses whether there's any limiting principle.The kid's history is chaotic: DFCS involvement, school-hopping, swastikas, searched "how to kill your dad" on a school computer, missed his entire eighth-grade year. Does all that make the father look negligent—or create reasonable doubt he could have predicted this?Bob breaks down whether we're watching the rules change in real time.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ColinGray #ApalacheeHighSchool #NoGunLaws #ParentalLiability #CrumbleyCase #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #SchoolShooting #GeorgiaTrial #SecondDegreeMurder

Two words in a Los Angeles courtroom today. Not guilty. Entered by Nick Reiner's public defender as he sat slumped behind glass, charged with stabbing both of his parents to death.Rob Reiner. Michele Singer Reiner. Found in their bedroom with multiple stab wounds on the first night of Hanukkah. Their 32-year-old son arrested the same day, now facing two counts of first-degree murder with special circumstances.Today's plea triggered the expected outrage. But here's what most people don't understand: that plea wasn't a defense. It was a door. The real strategy hasn't been revealed yet.California's system requires defendants pursuing insanity defenses to enter dual pleas, triggering bifurcated trials where guilt and sanity are determined separately. Today was procedural. The psychiatric evaluations are ongoing. The defense is still deciding which path to take.Three options remain open. Full insanity under M'Naghten—proving Nick didn't know what he was doing or that it was wrong. Diminished actuality—using his documented schizoaffective disorder to challenge the premeditation required for first-degree murder. Or incompetence to stand trial—arguing he can't participate in his own defense right now.Legal experts are skeptical about full insanity. Nick was at a Christmas party hours before the killings, arguing with his father in front of witnesses. If you can argue, you're not legally insane.The more likely play? Reduced charges. Second-degree murder. Manslaughter. A different name for what happened, and different consequences.April 29th. Preliminary hearing. The real fight begins.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #NotGuiltyPlea #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #MurderTrial #HiddenKillers #Parricide #CriminalJustice

Most people think the tax code is confusing or unfair. In this episode, you'll learn why it's actually a tool designed to help business owners and investors keep more of their money. We break down legal tax strategies the wealthy have used for years, including real estate deductions, cost segregation, bonus depreciation, and smart business write-offs. You'll hear how tax planning, money decisions, and smart strategies can lower your tax bill and help you build long-term wealth. These are real, legal moves—not scams—and they're available to you if you know how the rules work. Listen now to learn how to use the tax code to protect your income and grow your wealth.   Next Steps:

(February 25, 2026) Amy King and Neil Saavedra join Bill for Handel on the News. Takeaways from President Trump’s State of the Union Address. DOJ appears to have withheld some Epstein documents. EX-LAFD Chief Crowley files whistleblower retaliation lawsuit against city of L.A. Legal fight ahead as court allows Ten Commandments in classrooms.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Joe Piscopo Show 2-25-26 50:28 - Corey Lewandowski, Trump 2024 Senior Official Topic: State of the Union 59:36 - Congressman Mike Haridopolos, Republican representing Florida's 8th Congressional District Topic: State of the Union 1:12:09 - Stephen Moore, "Joe Piscopo Show" Resident Scholar of Economics, Chairman of FreedomWorks Task Force on Economic Revival, former Trump economic adviser and the author of "The Trump Economic Miracle: And the Plan to Unleash Prosperity Again" Topic: Economy in the State of the Union address 1:19:29 - Vincent J. Vallelong, President of the Sergeants Benevolent Association Topic: Cops assaulted with snowballs in New York 1:32:51 - Rob Chadwick, Retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent and Former Director of Tactical Training in Quantico and the Principal Training Advisor to the United States Concealed Carry Association (USCCA) Topic: $1 million reward offered by Savannah Guthrie in Nancy Guthrie investigation 1:45:00- Gregg Jarrett, Legal and political analyst for Fox News Channel and the author of "The Trial Of The Century" Topic: State of the Union; DOJ suing New Jersey over executive order limiting ICE operation and expansion of sanctuary status 2:05:00- Miranda Devine, columnist for the New York Post and the author of "The Big Guy" Topic: State of the Union and the Democratic responseSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The word “family” refers to a group of people that are related to one another by birth, marriage, law or choice. But, cultural diversity can also play a big role in how we define and experience family, particularly who is determined to be within the familial network when it comes to providing support to one another. A new research paper published today by the Pew Research Center focuses on how Black Americans in particular understand this meaning, as the analysis finds many Black Americans share emotional and financial support with relatives and non-relatives they consider to be their family. Today on AirTalk, we are joined by lead author of the study and senior researcher for race and ethnicity at Pew Research Center, Kiana Cox to go over her findings on the importance of identity, relationships and family for Black Americans. We also want to hear from you! How did your family define itself growing up? Give us a call at 866-893-5722 or email us at atcomments@laist.com.

Are the Epstein files creeping closer to Donald Trump and other rich, powerful, influential, privileged people? Well, look at what happened to the person formerly known as Prince Andrew.Once a criminal gets caught in the grips of the rule of law - things often start to happen. Being arrested and facing the prospect of prosecution for your crimes tends to have a way of focusing the mind on one thing in particular: 'how in the hell do I get out of this jam? What can I do to save myself?' One of the things criminals do is begin to tell law enforcement authorities about the crimes of others in hopes of reducing their own charges or criminal exposure.What might Former Prince Andrew and other influential people who are being criminally investigated in countries around the world do with information they might have about the crimes of OTHER influential people? What might they do to try to save themselves? Are the Epstein walls finally closing in on Donald Trump?Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Episode 032 of DEFCON ZERQ, Alpha Warrior and Josh Reid unpack the strategic landscape following recent legal and political developments, focusing on timing, optics, and narrative control. The hosts analyze how court rulings, executive responses, and media amplification interact to shape public perception in high-stakes moments. They revisit key themes surrounding institutional authority, questioning whether apparent setbacks are tactical pivots rather than defeats. The discussion emphasizes discernment over emotional reaction, encouraging listeners to evaluate moves within a broader strategic framework rather than through isolated headlines. Alpha and Josh also explore the role of public patience, the importance of understanding legal pathways, and how information is selectively framed to influence momentum. Throughout the episode, they stress the value of staying grounded, maintaining perspective, and recognizing patterns over personalities. Ep. 032 continues the DEFCON ZERQ tradition of blending current events with strategic analysis, challenging the audience to look beyond surface narratives and consider the deeper positioning at play.

A lawyer representing a woman who says she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein has publicly stated that Prince Andrew should be “very concerned” about new allegations linked to Epstein's sex-trafficking network. The attorney, who has represented several Epstein survivors, pointed to court documents and depositions that describe the accuser's claims that she was trafficked by Epstein and forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including the former prince, while she was underage. The lawyer urged Andrew to cooperate fully with authorities rather than continue to deny the accusations, suggesting that his past statements and resistance to submitting testimony have raised serious legal concerns.These remarks come amid broader scrutiny of Andrew's ties to Epstein and continuing legal pressure from survivors' attorneys. Although Andrew has consistently denied involvement in any illegal conduct and previously settled a civil lawsuit with one of Epstein's accusers without admitting guilt, the lawyer's comments underscore the ongoing tension between the former royal's public denials and the detailed allegations surfaced in litigation and public filings. The situation reflects the enduring fallout from Epstein's network and the continuing efforts by victims and their representatives to seek accountability from those they say were part of or enabled his abuses.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew could be held 'criminally liable for sex trafficking after introducing abuse victim to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell', lawyer claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode of the Level Up Claims Podcast, host Galen Hair sits down with business attorney Matthew Fornaro, a commercial litigation and business law attorney who left Big Law to help small and mid-sized businesses prevent legal disasters before they start.   Matthew shares what business owners get wrong about contracts, compliance, and professional budgeting—and why DIY agreements, AI-generated contracts, and "take it or leave it" commercial leases are ticking time bombs. He also breaks down the mindset shift required to treat your business like a profession—not a hobby—and why proactive legal strategy is always cheaper than reactive litigation.   Highlights: • Why Big Law overstaffing creates hidden inefficiencies • The danger of AI-generated and DIY contracts • Common red flags in commercial leases • Why small businesses must budget for legal professionals • Proactive vs reactive legal strategy • How to build loyalty and long-term client relationships • Managing compliance before enforcement actions begin • Representing lawyers as clients (and why some can't turn it off) • Integrating AI responsibly into a law firm • What it really means to level up as a business owner   Episode Resources: • Connect with Matthew Fornaro • https://fornarolegal.com • Connect with Galen M. Hair • https://insuranceclaimhq.com • hair@hairshunnarah.com • https://levelupclaim.com/

Immigrants with asylum cases are missing their court hearings in higher numbers - and that's leading to MORE deportation orders.

Legal operations is growing fast, but there's no standardized pathway for professionals entering the field. That's the gap Colin S. McCarthy and Anne Graue are working to close with Our Legal Community (OLC). On this episode, Colin and Anne share why they created OLC—a global community focused on certification, knowledge sharing, and career growth for legal ops professionals. They pair newcomers with experienced coaches who've built legal ops programs from the ground up, creating the certification standards the industry has been missing. We also talked about AI's role in legal teams, the future of in-house legal departments, and what makes OLC different from other networking groups. If you're in legal ops or thinking about starting a legal ops function, this one's worth your time.

Mit dem EU-AML-Paket reformiert die EU ihr Geldwäscherecht strukturell und institutionell grundlegend. Im „Alles Legal“-Podcast ordnen Sebastian Glaab (Annerton) und Dr. Camillo Werdich (Sinpex) ein, warum viele Verpflichtete operativ noch nicht auf den kommenden Rechtsrahmen ausgerichtet sind.

Last week, the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's expansive tariffs, ruling that they exceeded the authority given to him by Congress. The 6-3 decision saw conservative Justices Gorsuch, Coney Barrett, and Chief Justice Roberts align with the court's three liberal justices, though as Mary and Andrew explain, through different pathways: the conservative justices using the “major questions doctrine” as their guiding principle, while the liberal justices arrived at the same result through statutory interpretation and good ‘ole “common sense.” The co-hosts spend most of this episode walking through key parts of the ruling, noting Justice Gorsuch's opinion that the legislative process ought to reflect the will of elected representatives, “not just that of one faction or man.” Then, Mary and Andrew turn to a significant ruling against ICE in West Virginia, where a federal judge admonished agents for wearing masks and using unmarked cars, a presence akin to a “secret police force." And last up, a scathing review of Judge Eileen Cannon's decision not to release Jack Smith's report in the classified documents case. Sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts to listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads. You'll also get exclusive bonus content from this and other shows. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As reported by CNN, "Supreme Court rules that Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal."Wait, Donald Trump did something illegal? Who could've seen THAT coming?Glenn covers the new Supreme Court ruling striking down Donald Trump's tariffs as illegal and unconstitutional.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

SPECIAL GUESTS Brooke and Tess of Psych Legal Pop Podcast join us this week to catch up on what the Brown - Woolley & Co. Families have been up to, as well as the deepest of weekly dives on any and all things SISTER WIVES!SHOW LINEUP:-An Off Season KIKI with Brooke and Tess!-Cooking with Christine (and David...apparantly)-That Padron MERCH that nobody asked for-Taeda Farms progress-We hold space for Meri's press tour-Salty Birches hoodie merch series continues-A check in with MSWC and Robyn's gridCheck out Psych Legal Pop Podcast here!!!https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/psych-legal-pop-podcast/id1646287507LEAVE US A VOICEMAIL AND SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS!https://www.speakpipe.com/lovetohateSnark and sarcasm is highly encouraged as we see what our favorite family is up to, as well as a dip into the latest pop culture news and highlights. Subscribe on YouTube, Patreon, and your favorite podcast app!Please like and subscribe on Youtube!Join our private Facebook Group "We Love to Hate Everything"Coming up this week on Patreon:patreon.com/lovetohatetv + patreon.com/trpod*THE ENTIRE BACKLOG OF AMANDA LOVES TO HATE TEEN MOM IS AVAILABLE FOR only $3*WE LOVE TO HATE TV*Tier 1+: Frasier S6 E14 "Three Valentines”*Tiers 2+: Sister Wives S16 E2 "Four Wives, Three Fires"TOTAL REQUEST PODCASTFrasier S6 E14 "Three Valentines"GIRL DINNERGirl Dinner Episode 81 “Unexpected & Love is Blind”CHECK OUT AMANDA'S OTHER PODCAST POD AND THE CITY!!! Available on Itunes/Spotify etc, Youtube, and Patreon! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

When Donald Trump returned to office, he pledged the largest immigration crackdown in U.S. history. While public debate centered on mass deportations, a quieter — and potentially more consequential — transformation has taken shape: the rapid expansion of immigrant detention capacity inside the United States. New 2025 data shows that 77% of people newly placed into deportation proceedings had no criminal conviction. At the same time, ICE is consolidating more than 200 detention sites into 34 massive facilities — including proposed “mega-centers” capable of holding up to 10,000 people each. Planned sites span Georgia, Maryland, Texas, and Arizona, with total capacity projected to approach 100,000 beds. A controversial Department of Homeland Security memo now directs mandatory “re-vetting” of refugees at the one-year mark, allowing detention during inspection with no defined time limit. Critics argue this creates the risk of prolonged — even indefinite — confinement for people lawfully admitted to the United States. Federal judges have rebuked elements of the policy, citing constitutional concerns and unlawful detention practices. Meanwhile, fatal encounters involving federal immigration officers and a wave of collapsed federal prosecutions have intensified scrutiny. Supporters call the overhaul modernization and a restoration of order. Opponents see the construction of a permanent detention infrastructure that could outlast any single administration. Independent media has never been more important. Please support this channel by subscribing here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g?sub_confirmation=1 Join this channel with a membership for exclusive early access and bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g/join Five Minute News is an Evergreen Podcast, covering politics, inequality, health and climate - delivering independent, unbiased and essential news for the US and across the world. Visit us online at http://www.fiveminute.news Follow us on Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/fiveminutenews.bsky.social Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/fiveminnews Support us on Patreon http://www.patreon.com/fiveminutenews You can subscribe to Five Minute News with your preferred podcast app, ask your smart speaker, or enable Five Minute News as your Amazon Alexa Flash Briefing skill. CONTENT DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed on this channel are those of the guests and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Anthony Davis or Five Minute News LLC. Any content provided by our hosts, guests or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything, in line with the First Amendment right to free and protected speech. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Governments at all levels abuse their “privilege” of eminent domain, the taking of private property for government use. Murray Rothbard understood that government was not justified to seize property for such use in the first place.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/rothbard-and-eminent-domain-confused-history-and-legal-sleight-hand

Jeremy Keil explains the 5 RMD (Required Minimum Distribution) mistakes in Retirement and how to avoid them. A retiree recently called for help. It was their first year taking Required Minimum Distributions. They had delayed their first RMD until April of the following year — which meant taking two distributions in one tax year. That part was allowed. In some cases, it can even be strategic. But when they called their IRA custodian and asked, “How much should I withhold for taxes?” they were given the default answer: 10% federal withholding. They assumed that must be right. It wasn't. They ended up short on taxes by more than $10,000 — and owed penalties on top of that. That situation wasn't caused by breaking a rule. It was caused by following the rule without a plan. And that's where most RMD mistakes begin. I recently wrote an article for Kiplinger magazine titled “5 RMD Mistakes That Could Cost You Big-Time: Even Seasoned Retirees Slip Up” and for this week's episode of the “Retire Today” podcast I decided to talk through each of these mistakes in detail. Mistake #1: Waiting Until Age 73 to Create a Plan Turning 73 is not a strategy. If you wait until the government forces your first RMD to think about it, you've already missed years of opportunity. The window between retirement and RMD age is often the most flexible tax-planning period of your life. In those years, you may have: Lower earned income No required withdrawals yet Control over when and how you take distributions That's prime territory for intentional tax planning. Once RMDs begin, you've lost some flexibility. In the KEEP step of the Retirement Master Plan, tax timing matters. RMDs don't happen in isolation. They interact with Social Security, pensions, and brokerage income. Planning ahead—sometimes a decade ahead—can dramatically change the long-term outcome. Mistake #2: Failing to Make Use of Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) This one surprises me every year. RMDs currently begin at age 73 (moving to 75 for those born in 1960 or later). But Qualified Charitable Distributions still start at 70½. That means you can send money directly from your IRA to a charity before RMDs even begin. Why does that matter? Because a QCD: Reduces your IRA balance (lowering future RMDs) Keeps the distribution out of your taxable income May help limit Social Security taxation May help reduce Medicare premium surcharges Many retirees continue writing checks to charities from their checking account, hoping for a deduction. With today's larger standard deduction, many people don't itemize at all. Going directly from IRA to charity is often more tax-efficient—and sometimes dramatically so. If charitable giving is already part of your plan, the tax strategy should be part of it too. Mistake #3: Doing the Wrong Tax Withholding When retirees call their custodian to take their RMD, they're often asked: “How much would you like withheld for taxes?” The default federal withholding is often 10% for IRAs and 20% for 401(k)s. Many people assume, “That must be right.” It often isn't. I recently saw a retiree who delayed their first RMD until April of the following year—which meant taking two distributions in one year. They defaulted to 10% withholding. They ended up underpaying taxes by more than $10,000 and owed penalties. The custodian can't provide tax planning. That's not their role. Before taking an RMD, you need to project: What tax bracket you'll land in Whether additional withholding is necessary How this affects your overall estimated payments Again, this falls under the KEEP step. Don't let the default settings dictate your tax bill. Mistake #4: Not Realizing How Your RMD Income Affects the Rest of Your Tax Return RMDs don't just increase taxable income. They can: Make more of your Social Security taxable Push capital gains from 0% into taxable territory Trigger Medicare IRMAA surcharges Many retirees focus only on their marginal bracket. But the real issue is tax cost, not tax bracket. An extra $20,000 RMD might not just be taxed at 22%. It could cascade into additional taxation elsewhere. That's why projections matter. You don't want to discover these ripple effects after the fact. Mistake #5: Forgetting That the M in RMD means ‘Minimum,' not ‘Maximum' The M in RMD stands for minimum. It does not mean that's the only amount you're allowed to withdraw. You can: Withdraw more than your RMD Complete Roth conversions after satisfying the RMD Send more than your RMD amount to charity (subject to QCD limits) Sometimes taking more than the minimum makes sense—especially if it smooths taxes over multiple years. RMDs are a rule. They are not a retirement strategy. The Bigger Lesson RMDs are not just a government requirement. They are a planning opportunity—or a planning hazard. They affect your income plan (MAKE), your spending plan (SPEND), your tax strategy (KEEP), and even what you ultimately LEAVE behind. The biggest mistake isn't misunderstanding a rule. It's treating RMDs as an isolated event instead of part of a coordinated retirement master plan. Because in retirement, small tax decisions compound just like investment returns may do. And when handled intentionally, RMDs don't have to derail anything at all. Don't forget to leave a rating for the “Retire Today” podcast if you've been enjoying these episodes! Subscribe to Retire Today to get new episodes every Wednesday. Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/retire-today/id1488769337  Spotify Podcasts: https://bit.ly/RetireTodaySpotify About the Author: Jeremy Keil, CFP®, CFA is a retirement financial advisor with Keil Financial Partners, author of Retire Today: Create Your Retirement Income Plan in 5 Simple Steps, and host of the Retirement Today blog and podcast, as well as the Mr. Retirement YouTube channel. Jeremy is a contributor to Kiplinger and is frequently cited in publications like the Wall Street Journal and New York Times. Additional Links: – Buy Jeremy's book – Retire Today: Create Your Retirement Master Plan in 5 Simple Steps – “5 RMD Mistakes That Could Cost You Big-Time: Even Seasoned Retirees Slip Up” by Jeremy Keil, Kiplinger Magazine – https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/required-minimum-distributions-rmds/rmd-mistakes-that-even-seasoned-retirees-can-make – Create Your Retirement Master Plan in 5 Simple Steps – 5StepRetirementPlan.com  Connect With Jeremy Keil: Keil Financial Partners LinkedIn: Jeremy Keil Facebook: Jeremy Keil LinkedIn: Keil Financial Partners YouTube: Mr. Retirement Book an Intro Call with Jeremy's Team Media Disclosures: Disclosures This media is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not consider the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any consumer. Nothing in this program should be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice, nor as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. The views and opinions expressed are those of the host and any guest, current as of the date of recording, and may change without notice as market, political or economic conditions evolve. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Legal & Tax Disclosure Consumers should consult their own qualified attorney, CPA, or other professional advisor regarding their specific legal and tax situations. Advisor Disclosures Alongside, LLC, doing business as Keil Financial Partners, is an SEC-registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or expertise. Advisory services are delivered through the Alongside, LLC platform. Keil Financial Partners is independent, not owned or operated by Alongside, LLC. Additional information about Alongside, LLC – including its services, fees and any material conflicts of interest – can be found at https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/summary/333587 or by requesting Form ADV Part 2A. The content of this media should not be reproduced or redistributed without the firm’s written consent. Any trademarks or service marks mentioned belong to their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. Additional Important Disclosures

In this episode, the hosts discuss various topics related to the delivery industry, including the challenges faced by drivers due to weather conditions, the recent UPS buyout program, and the ongoing legal battles between UPS and the Teamsters. They also touch on Olympic sports highlights and share personal anecdotes about their experiences as delivery drivers. The conversation emphasizes the importance of knowledge and awareness in navigating the complexities of the job, especially in light of management tactics aimed at discipline and performance monitoring. Join the Patreon Family Join our Discord TAKEAWAYS: Knowledge is power when it comes to our job. The UPS buyout program is a significant change for drivers. Weather conditions can greatly impact delivery routes. Olympic sports can bring excitement and national pride. Management tactics are increasingly focused on discipline and performance monitoring. Teamsters are actively fighting against UPS's management practices. Drivers need to be aware of their rights and protections. Personal experiences can highlight the challenges of the delivery job. Community support among drivers is crucial during tough times. Understanding the contract and company policies is essential for drivers. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction and Technical Setup 00:04 Navigating Challenges in Delivery Driving 03:14 The Impact of Weather on Delivery Routes 08:55 The UPS Buyout Program: What You Need to Know 16:59 Teamsters vs. UPS: Legal Battles and Management Tactics 26:41 Understanding UPS Management's Guide to Discipline 29:16 Understanding Selection Areas and Training Methods 33:52 The Evolution of Driver Training and Management Tactics 37:36 Navigating New Rules and Regulations 40:57 Management's Role in Driver Performance 44:34 The Importance of Knowledge and Union Support 46:15 Final Thoughts and Reflections on the Industry Thank you to our TOP RATE LEGENDS, Tony & Starla! THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED OR VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PODCAST ARE THOSE OF THE HOSTS AND GUESTS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT ANY DELIVERY COMPANY    

As reported by CNN, "Supreme Court rules that Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal."Wait, Donald Trump did something illegal? Who could've seen THAT coming?Glenn covers the new Supreme Court ruling striking down Donald Trump's tariffs as illegal and unconstitutional.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Welcome to another episode of the Legal Nurse Podcast, hosted by Pat Iyer. In today's episode, “Mastering Your Fees,” Pat Iyer focuses on one of the most challenging and often overlooked aspects of running a successful Legal Nurse Consulting (LNC) business: understanding and managing your money mindset. If you've ever found yourself hesitating to quote your rates, worried about chasing overdue invoices, or feeling uneasy about asking for what you're truly worth, this episode is for you. Pat Iyer unpacks the deep-rooted beliefs that influence how LNCs handle billing, collections, and client negotiations, tracing these habits back to early life experiences and learned behaviors around money. She discusses the emotional and psychological hurdles that can hold consultants back and shares practical strategies to help you confidently set boundaries, enforce retainer agreements, and maintain professional respect in your financial dealings. You'll learn actionable steps for improving your cash flow, asserting your value, and steering clear of the pitfalls that come with undercharging or negotiating your worth. Whether you're new to the field or a seasoned consultant looking to reinforce your financial foundation, this episode is filled with insights and exercises that will help you build a healthier relationship with money and ultimately, a stronger business. Join Pat Iyer for a candid conversation packed with wisdom and actionable advice for every LNC striving for both professional satisfaction and financial success. What You'll Learn in This Episode on Building Financial Confidence as a Legal Nurse Consultant Here are 5 discussion questions answered in the podcast: What are some practical steps LNCs can take to enforce payment boundaries without damaging client relationships? Pat Iyer suggests tracking where your clients come from and analyzing patterns in fee resistance. How could this approach influence your marketing and client selection? How do you typically handle slow or late payments, and what could you change about your follow-up process to achieve better results? Why is it important to avoid negotiating your fees or underpricing your services, according to Pat Iyer, and what are the potential long-term consequences? How can practicing your rate statements in advance help build confidence, and what other techniques might strengthen your negotiation skills? Listen to our podcasts or watch them using our app, Expert.edu, available at legalnursebusiness.com/expertedu. Get the free transcripts and also learn about other ways to subscribe. Go to Legal Nurse Podcasts subscribe options by using this short link: http://LNC.tips/subscribepodcast. Grow Your LNC Business 13th LNC SUCCESS® ONLINE CONFERENCE April 23, 24, and 25, 2026 Skills, Strategy, Results Gain deposition mastery, marketing confidence, and clinical–legal insight from industry leaders you can apply to your next case and client call. Build a Practice Attorneys Remember Learn exactly how to showcase expertise, attract referrals, and turn complex medical records into clear, defensible stories that win trust. Learn From the Best—Then Ask Them Anything Get step-by-step training, live “hot seat” solutions, and exclusive VIP Q&A time with Pat Iyer to accelerate your LNC growth. Register now- Limited spots available https://youtu.be/xVVhCVm9btg Your Presenter for Building Financial Confidence as a Legal Nurse Consultant Pat Iyer Pat Iyer is a seasoned legal nurse consultant and business coach, renowned for her expertise in guiding new legal nurse consultants to successfully break into the field. As the host of the Legal Nurse Podcast, Pat addresses critical challenges that legal nurse consultants face, such as difficulty in landing clients and a lack of response from attorneys. Through her insightful episodes, she emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating one's value to potential clients. With a wealth of experience, Pat has empowered countless consultants to overcome these hurdles and thrive in their careers. Connect with Pat Iyer by email at patiyer@legalnusebusiness.com

Are you tired of the hype, confusion, and conflicting advice dominating short-term rental investing? What if the real secret to real estate freedom isn't just how you operate, but how you buy?In this solo episode, Kenny Bedwell gets brutally honest about the surprising ways investors lose money by overpaying, believing guru projections, and missing the “money on the buy” formula. He shreds industry misconceptions and unpacks the exact math and legal details behind ARV (After Repair Value), showing how cash flow and forced appreciation are the double-headed dragon of breakthrough investing.Tune in now to sidestep costly mistakes, stop relying on rumors, and get exclusive, actionable clarity you won't hear from brokers, TikTok gurus, or random Facebook groups. Listen before you make your next offer or risk losing your shot at financial freedom!Timestamped Highlights[00:00] – Why operating isn't enough: The unseen risk of buying wrong[00:01:29] – Do you really have to be a top operator, or is buying right the real unlock?[00:03:02] – The two proven ways properties actually make money and where most get it wrong[00:04:21] – ARV exposed: How emotional upgrades mislead you (and what counts as real value)[00:05:35] – The appraisal rollercoaster: Millionaires or victims of ‘desk appraisals'?[00:06:33] – Savvy investors spot the difference: How to cut through market myths[00:10:14] – Buying at the top of the market—why every improvement becomes worthless[00:13:31] – Legal bedroom drama: Why adding beds can blow up your deal[00:16:49] – Pools, game rooms, and garages: What really moves the needle (and what's a sunk cost)[00:18:13] – Are you using the wrong comps? How one tweak can save or sink your entire investment[00:24:25] – The price per square foot strategy: How real pros calculate ARV (step-by-step)[00:25:30] – The 70% rule and double-headed approach: Protecting your cash flow and upside for 2026Mentioned ResourcesPrice Per Square FootARV (After Repair Value) CalculationLegal bedroom requirements (egress window, heating, cooling, etc.)Desk appraisal70% RuleCash flow and appreciation modelsImportant LinksWant us to find the deals for you? https://strinsights.com

In this episode, Carly and Joe sit down with Bobby Klinck, Harvard Law grad and founder of Plainly Legal, to break down the legal basics every solopreneur should handle early without getting scared, overwhelmed, or spending $5,000 on day one. Bobby explains the “prevention vs cure” approach to legal protection, the fast checks that can save you from a painful rebrand, and the biggest copyright mistakes that trigger expensive demand letters.You'll learn what to prioritize first, what you can safely DIY, and how to avoid the most common traps (like using a brand name without a trademark search, grabbing images from the internet, skipping contractor agreements, and misunderstanding what an LLC actually protects).Plus: Bobby shares how to get a free legal audit so you can see what you need, without paying a lawyer just to understand the basics.Links & Resources: Plainly Legal (look for “Start Free” to run the free legal audit)FAQsDo I need a privacy policy on my website? In most cases, yes, especially if you collect visitor data (analytics, email opt-ins, cookies). A privacy policy is the one website document Bobby says is typically legally required.Can I use images I find online if I give credit? Usually no. Most images are protected by copyright, and “credit” doesn't equal permission. Use licensed images, free-use sites, or your own/AI-generated visuals.Can an LLC stop someone from suing me personally? Not for your own actions. An LLC can help limit certain business liabilities, but it doesn't make you lawsuit-proof, especially if the claim is tied to what you did.

Governments at all levels abuse their “privilege” of eminent domain, the taking of private property for government use. Murray Rothbard understood that government was not justified to seize property for such use in the first place.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/rothbard-and-eminent-domain-confused-history-and-legal-sleight-hand

Helping you diagnose a common cause of hypertension!Hypertension is a growing disease globally, affecting millions of individuals and increasing the risk of heart disease and stroke. Along with the expert help of Dr. Vaidya (Brigham and Women's Hospital), we help reimagine the approach of clinicians in terms of hypertension and help them navigate common diagnostic dilemmas! @AnandVaidya17 (Bluesky) @AnandVaidya17 (X)Claim CME for this episode at curbsiders.vcuhealth.org!Patreon | Episodes | Subscribe | Spotify | YouTube | Newsletter | Contact | Swag! | CMEShow Segments Introduction and Personal Interests Advice and Wisdom in Medicine  Case 1 Defining Primary Aldosteronism Screening for Primary Aldosteronism How common is Primary Aldosteronism Challenges in Diagnosis and Testing Medication Management and Testing Protocols Managing indeterminate cases Aldosterone Suppression Testing and its role Discussing treatment options with patients Case 2 Considering genetic causes of Primary Aldosteronism The need for AVS for lateralization Upcoming imaging modalities for Primary Aldosteronism Case 3 Medical Management of Primary Aldosteronism Future Directions in Treatment Credits Producer, Writer, Show Notes:Mobeen Ahmad MBBS  Infographic:Kate Grant MBChB MRCGP Cover Art:Kate Grant MBChB MRCGP Hosts: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP    Reviewer: Emi Okamoto MD Showrunners: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP Technical Production: PodPaste Guest:  Anand Vaidya MD, MMSc DisclosuresDr. Vaidya has disclosed the following: Financial Relationships: Astra Zeneca-Consulting Fee and Corcept-Consulting Fee, relationships have not ended. The Curbsiders report no relevant financial disclosures. Sponsor: The Sanford GuideCurbsiders listeners can get 20% off the already very moderately priced yearly subscriptions directly at sanfordguide.com. Go to sanfordguide.com and use the code, CURB at checkout.Sponsor: MedStudy PodcastCurbsiders listeners get 15% off with code CURB15 atmedstudy.comSponsor: Panacea Legal Visit Panacea.Legal and use code CURB20 for 20% off contract review services.Sponsor: DeleteMeGet 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to joindeleteme.com/CURB and use promo code CURB at checkout.

We are seeing repercussions around the world as a result of the release of even just some of the Epstein files. There are criminal investigations underweight in multiple countries. In the United Kingdom a UK ambassador to the US has had multiple search warrants executed on his properties. A former prince has been placed under arrest. Yet here in the United States, from our Department of Justice we get crickets and coverups.Covering up the crimes of others constitutes a crime itself, accessory after the fact, as Glenn explains.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Following Friday's Supreme Court decision striking down a number of President Trump's tariffs, the administration is moving to impose a global 15% tariff, with some exceptions for countries like Canada and Mexico. The tariffs, which are being levied temporarily under a statutory authority known as Section 122, will bring the average effective tariff rate to 13.7%, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Also on the program: Spain's new plan to bolster its workforce by granting legal status to migrants living in the country illegally.