Podcasts about Scotus

Louisiana, Alabama, and Arkansas have filed two lawsuits targeting abortion shield laws and the providers who mail abortion pills into states where abortion is banned. Imani examines how the states use fetal personhood to describe their alleged injuries, whether the Supreme Court is likely to hear their case, and what today's shield-law fight has in common with the personal liberty laws Northern states used to resist the Fugitive Slave Act. Also: why Louisiana put mifepristone, anthrax, and mail bombs in the same sentence. Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires. Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Baby Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. B*itch, Listen now has its own dedicated feed on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you get your podcasts. If you already subscribe to Baby Boom! Lawyered, sign up for B*tch, Listen so you won't miss it.

What were Republicans thinking going after Jack Smith again? Kyle Cheney, Conor Lamb, and Mimi Rocah join Harry to discuss that and the week's cascade of big legal news. Will the Department of Justice actually pursue perjury charges against Smith? Will Judge Williams and Judge Boasberg get to push ahead toward contempt proceedings against Trump and the administration? And will Trump come to regret the acceleration of his deportation drive—boosted this week by SCOTUS—when midterm votes are tallied? Mentioned in this episode:Kyle's reporting.Conor's Substack.Mimi's Substack.Mimi's forthcoming book.Harry's column about the latest in Judge Williams's slush fund case.The New Yorker's reporting about the hard choices facing DOJ attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today on AirTalk: SCOTUS to review mandatory detention policy (0:30) AI detectors (18:46) A Librarian's War (37:48) CNN gubernatorial debate (51:42) MLB postseason (1:07:14) TV Talk (1:24:36)

This Day in Legal History: The Nuremberg VerdictsOn October 1, 1946, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg delivered its sentences on the surviving leaders of Nazi Germany. Of the 22 defendants, 19 were convicted and three were acquitted. Twelve were sentenced to death, three to life imprisonment, and four to prison terms of 10 to 20 years. Hermann Göring killed himself the night before his scheduled execution. Martin Bormann, tried in absentia, was never found to face his sentence. The other death sentences were carried out on October 16.The legal achievement of Nuremberg was the decision to hold a trial at all. The Allies could have simply executed the Nazi leadership; some officials argued for exactly that. Instead, at the urging of figures like U.S. Justice Robert Jackson, who left the Supreme Court to serve as chief prosecutor, they built a court, allowed defense counsel, admitted evidence, and let the outcome turn on proof. The acquittals mattered as much as the convictions: they showed the tribunal was deciding cases, not ratifying a foregone conclusion. Nuremberg also established principles that still anchor international law, most importantly that “following orders” is not a defense to crimes against humanity, and that individuals, not just states, can be held criminally responsible for aggression and atrocities.The significance of October 1, 1946 is the idea in today's opening quote, from Jackson's opening statement: that even when dealing with the worst crimes imaginable, the state submits to legal process rather than acting on raw power. That idea, that the government must work through courts and procedure, especially when it is detaining, removing, or putting people to death, runs through every story we cover today.The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether the administration can detain millions of immigrants for the entire length of their deportation proceedings without a bond hearing. In July 2025, the Department of Homeland Security issued guidance saying that immigrants who entered the country illegally are subject to mandatory detention with no bond hearing while their cases proceed, a process that can take months or years. The legal fight is about which section of the immigration statute applies. The law has one provision that requires detention for “applicants for admission,” historically understood to mean people arriving at the border. A separate provision governs people already living in the country and generally lets them ask an immigration judge for release on bond. The administration's new position is that anyone who entered without inspection remains an “applicant for admission” no matter how long they've lived here, which would move them into the mandatory-detention category. The case the Court took involves Ricardo Aparecido Barbosa da Cunha, a Brazilian national who authorities say entered illegally two decades ago and applied for asylum in 2016. The Second Circuit ruled against the government. And according to the reporting, appeals judges in nine of the eleven federal circuits to consider the question have concluded that detention without a bond hearing violates federal law. That makes the administration's position an outlier among the lower courts, which is part of why the Supreme Court stepped in. The stakes are very large. A bond hearing doesn't guarantee release; it just means a judge decides whether a person is a flight risk or a danger. If the Court sides with the administration, millions of long-term residents could be held without that individualized review for the length of their cases. The Court will hear it in the term that opens Monday.US Supreme Court to hear clash over Trump's immigration detention policy | Reuters · Yahoo News · National Immigration ForumThe U.S. Court of International Trade heard arguments in a challenge to the President's “forced labor” tariffs, and opponents say the case is a test of whether he can rebuild the tariff power the Supreme Court took away in February. Imposed in late July, the tariffs range from 10% to 12.5% on goods from 60 trading partners, including the European Union and China, and they cover more than 99% of goods imported into the United States. The stated justification is that those countries have failed to stop imports made with forced labor. Four small businesses and 25 Democratic-led states sued, and their three cases were consolidated before a three-judge panel with appointees of Presidents Trump, Obama, and Biden. Their argument is that the trade statute the administration relied on requires country-specific findings of unfair trade practices, reached through a real investigation. In their telling, “forced labor” is a pretext: a label stretched over nearly all imports from 60 countries to recreate the broad, global tariff authority the Supreme Court rejected when it struck down the emergency-powers tariffs. The legal question is how closely courts will examine the factual basis for a statutory trade remedy. If the statute requires findings and the findings are thin or generic, the tariffs are vulnerable. If the court defers to the executive's judgment on trade practices, they likely survive. The panel isn't expected to rule from the bench. This connects directly to my column from last week on building an unwinding mechanism into tariffs from the start. If these tariffs fall too, importers will be back in the refund line, and consumers who paid higher prices will again have no clear way to get that money back.US trade court to weigh challenge to Trump's forced labor tariffs | Reuters · CNBC · Foreign PolicyAnd finally, a story that took a turn no one expected. Tennessee tried to execute Christa Pike on Wednesday night, and the execution failed. Pike was the only woman on Tennessee's death row, convicted of the 1995 torture and murder of 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer, a fellow student at a Knoxville Job Corps program. Pike was 18 at the time of the crime. The legal path to Wednesday night was itself dramatic. On Wednesday morning, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit granted a short stay to consider her claim that evidence of severe childhood sexual abuse was never adequately considered at sentencing. Tennessee went to the Supreme Court, which vacated the stay Wednesday evening, with Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissenting. Officials then administered two doses of the lethal drug, but Pike's heart was still beating, and she was taken to a hospital. Governor Bill Lee has ordered a comprehensive third-party review and said the remaining execution scheduled for this year will not go forward. Now the legal questions are unusual and difficult. The closest Supreme Court precedent is from 1947, Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, when the state's electric chair failed to kill Willie Francis and the Court held, 5 to 4, that Louisiana could try again without violating the Eighth Amendment. Modern lethal-injection cases like Baze v. Rees and Bucklew v. Precythe focus on whether a method creates a substantial risk of severe pain, but they don't squarely address what happens after an execution has actually been attempted and failed. Pike's lawyers will almost certainly argue that a second attempt would be cruel and unusual. There are also the issues that were already in the case: her age at the time of the crime, just past the line the Supreme Court drew in Roper v. Simmons barring execution for crimes committed under 18, and the abuse evidence the Sixth Circuit wanted time to examine. Whatever one's view of the death penalty, a failed execution is exactly the kind of event the Eighth Amendment was written to make courts confront, and this case will now test what the Constitution requires when the state's ultimate punishment doesn't work.Tennessee due to execute woman for first time in two centuries | Reuters · NPR · CBS News This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Hour 3- The Mighty Pines will host Pines Fest on October 17, Neil Salsich joins the studio to preview the event. How do you feel about phones at concerts? Former special operations aviator Anthony Dye weighs-in on the cockpit fight on a Fly Dubai flight this week. Trump is angry at his SCOTUS nominations.

President Trump told AI executives they can police themselves and signed an order branding the technology “super intelligence,” even as some of those same companies say the rules for keeping it safe are still a work in progress.More than two decades after the U.S. first invaded Iraq, American forces have now left the country as Iran-backed militias remain powerful and some U.S. partners warn they are being left vulnerable.The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to resume deporting some immigrants to countries they have no ties to while the justices consider whether the policy is legal.Want more analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.Support public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show's perks include sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.Today's episode of Up First was edited by Rebekah Metzler, Alina Hartounian, Tina Kraja, Mohamad ElBardicy and Alice Woelfle.It was produced by Ziad Buchh and Ben Abrams.Our director is Christopher Thomas.We get engineering support from Neisha Heinis and Patrick Murray.Our technical director is Carleigh Strange.And our Supervising Producer is Michael Lipkin.(0:00) Introduction(01:50) Trump AI Summit(05:40) US Pulls Out Of Iraq(09:16) SCOTUS Third Country DeportationsSee pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Dave Rubin of "The Rubin Report" gives a first look at the stories you need to know to start your day, including the Supreme Court allowing the Trump administration to resume rapid third-country deportations while the case proceeds toward December arguments, restoring an enforcement tool already used to remove more than 25,000 migrants; Iran's rial crashing to a record low of more than 2.5 million to the dollar as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns its economy could collapse, Hormuz negotiations intensify, and the IRGC urges Americans to protest before the midterms; Lindsay Clancy's attorney Kevin Reddington questioning whether prosecutors proved she killed her three children after previously basing her defense on postpartum psychosis and criminal insanity; and much more. #rubinreport #scotus #deportation #iranwar #rial #lindsayclancytrial #daverubin

In this episode:“That's Propaganda,” says former DOJ senior ethics attorney, Joseph W. Tirrell, on the Trump administration's re-airing of their 2024 campaign ad, on the taxpayer's dimeWhy Mary and Andrew think SCOTUS' decision to uphold Trump's SAVE voter database will have a greater effect on the next electionHow irked the high court is about having to reject the Trump-back Missouri congressional map for a third timeThe legal status of the attempted media ban by the White HouseAnthropic's heated fight with the government over being labeled a “supply chain risk”The “hot mess” surrounding FBI agents reportedly being subpoenaed to testify in the grand conspiracy investigation in the Southern District of Florida, all while Jack Smith testifies in front of Congress yet again Sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts to listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads. You'll also get exclusive bonus content from this and other shows. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Kate and Josh talk September surprises for some Republican incumbents, SCOTUS' return to Trump's side, and Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt's rake step.Have polling questions ahead of the 2026 midterms? Email us, and we'll answer them on our new web show on YouTube every Tuesday from now til Election Day!To watch this episode on video, go to our YouTube page.We also have newsletters: subscribe here!Follow us on:Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/talkingpointsmemo.comFacebook: https://facebook.com/talkingpointsmemoTwitter: https://twitter.com/tpmInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkingpointsmemo/See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Today's Headlines: Republicans dragged Jack Smith back to Congress to testify about his Trump investigations, tried to catch him in a lie about attending a basketball game, and got the team name wrong — so he wasn't even at the game they accused him of attending, which is a new low for congressional gotcha moments. Meanwhile, Trump is personally handpicking the taxpayer-funded TV ads praising himself that DHS is airing before the midterms using $20 million from Customs and Border Protection funding. Trump also held a day-long AI summit he's calling "SI," had tech executives sign what he called a "morally binding" voluntary self-policing agreement, and launched America.gov — an AI-powered government website that initially answered that Trump lost the 2020 election before being updated to refuse the question entirely. Of course. Hegseth announced he's cutting over 20% of admirals and generals across the Army, Navy, and Air Force. In other news, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to let deportations to third countries continue while they decide whether it's constitutional — which is the judicial equivalent of "keep doing it while we figure out if you're allowed to." The Venezuelan DoorDash driver ICE shot ten days ago, who still has a bullet in his back because ICE rushed him out of the hospital, was charged with assaulting an agent for allegedly swiping him with a side mirror while trying to drive away. California banned ICE's electric shock gloves the same week. The Senate passed the Protect College Sports Act 77-22 in a rare bipartisan moment overhauling college athletics and NIL rules, though it still needs to pass the House after midterms. And New York Governor Hochul called the Cornell gang rape allegations "nothing short of horrifying" and requested an independent review, as USA Today revealed Cornell received 1,200 sexual assault reports between 2018 and 2024, filed disciplinary charges in 162, and expelled only 7 people. Resources/Articles mentioned: NYT: Jack Smith, Former Special Counsel Who Charged Trump, Appears Before Congress: Live Updates Axios: Scoop: Trump's hand-picked, taxpayer-funded ads about to ramp up AP News: Homeland Security taps $20M in taxpayer funds for pro-Trump ads Axios: Exclusive: Full list of attendees at White House AI lunch Axios: Trump, top AI leaders agree to voluntary ​AI ​standards AP News: Live updates: Trump says top tech firms have signed accord to 'self-police' AI development The Hill: Hegseth to cut 20 percent of admirals, generals in major Pentagon overhaul Axios: Senate passes sweeping college sports package AP News: Supreme Court lets quick deportations to third countries resume for now while it weighs Trump policy AP News: New California law bans officers from using gloves that deliver electric shocks AP News: Federal prosecutors charge Venezuelan man shot by ICE agent in Texas with assaulting an officer Cornell Sun: Gov. Kathy Hochul Requests ‘Independent Review' of Cornell's Response to Alleged Chi Phi Gang Rape Cornell Alumni Petition: Petition · CORNELL ALUMNI SUPPORTING JANE DOE - United States Subscribe to the Betches News Room and join the Morning Announcements group chat. Go to: betchesnews.substack.com Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Breitbart's Mike Slater is BACK with another great podcast about why YOU should stay positive about the 2026 Midterm Elections! The economy is actually great and Republicans can WIN BIG! Don't be fooled!After that opener, Mike speaks with AWR Hawkins, Breitbart Second Amendment Correspondent, about some recent news stories related to firearms and the American right to bear them. Things are looking SOLID there, too! Find out why!MAGA! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

For the Good of the Public brings you news and weekly conversations at the intersection of faith and civic life. Monday through Thursday, The Morning Five starts your day off with scripture and prayer, as we also catch up on the news together. Throughout the year, we air limited series on Fridays to dive deeper into conversations with civic leaders, thinkers, and public servants reimagining public life for the good of the public.Today's host was Michael Wear. Thanks for listening to The Morning Five! Please subscribe to and rate The Morning Five on your favorite podcast platform. Learn more about the work of the Center for Christianity and Public Life at www.ccpubliclife.org.Today's scripture: James 4:1-10 (ESV)News sources:https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/us/politics/supreme-court-deportations-third-country.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/world/asia/openai-australia-government-hack-apology.html https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/09/29/congress/democrats-ai-rogue-agents-cyberattack-01096455 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/us/politics/senate-college-sports.html https://www.wsj.com/sports/protect-college-sports-act-explained-22015f29?mod=hp_lead_pos11 Join the conversation and follow us at: Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@michaelwear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclife Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@MichaelRWear⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, @ccpubliclifeMusic by: King Sis#politics #faith #prayer #scripture #news #immigration #deportation #AI #OpenAI #Australia #Congress #collegesports #athletes #NIL

On this episode, we have a special guest from the AFJ Justice team. We are joined by our colleague Morgan Flitt an Alliance for Justice Senior Dorot Fellow. With Morgan we will be covering the upcoming cases that will be heard by the US Supreme Court this session. Many of these cases – affect everyday people and the issues they care about,  climate change, gun rights, voting, immigration and LGBTQ+ rights. Then we will talk about how nonprofits can get involved with supreme court advocacy, nominees, and more while staying nonpartisan and being mindful of lobbying limits. Attorneys for this Episode Brittany Leonard Susan Finkle Sourlis Morgan Flitt   Intro to Justice Program: Brittany ·      Our justice team works on both federal and state judicial appointments and elections and runs numerous invaluable resources including our judicial vacancy tracker and helps keep us and the public informed about nominees. This includes the decisions they make after they've been confirmed, and how cases in federal courts – especially the supreme court – are impacting our civil rights and democracy.   ·      Today, we are thrilled to be joined on the pod by our friend and colleague Morgan Flitt. Morgan is a fellow attorney who serves as the Senior Dorot Fellow on the Federal Courts team. ·      Today we want to talk about the upcoming cases in this supreme court term, what we should be keeping an eye on, the potential impacts for our c3 partners, and what nonprofits can do during this term and future terms to advocate.   Cases to watch out for this term (4 across 4 differenttt critical issue areas) ·      Climate Change o      Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder County (No. 25-170) §     Issue: Whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking relief for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate; and (2) whether this court has statutory and Article III jurisdiction to hear this case §     Brief context: The Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County and the City of Boulder sued Exxon Mobil and Suncor, arguing that they should share in the costs of mitigating climate change because they knowingly contributed to causing it through producing, marketing, and selling fossil fuels while misrepresenting its dangers. The companies argued federal law preempted these claims, but the lower court agreed with the Board and the City of Boulder. §     Consequences: If the Supreme Court sides with Big Oil and Gas Companies, giving them blanket federal immunity from state tort law, this could potentially wipe out the dozens of climate deception cases that states and localities have filed around the country. §     Argument: Oct 5, 2026   ·      Voting and democracy o      Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota (No. 25-1017) §     Issue: (1) Whether the National Voter Registration Act or a federal consent decree prohibits Arizona from requiring voter-registration applicants to produce "satisfactory evidence" of U.S. citizenship when registering with a state registration form; and (2) whether the NVRA prohibits Arizona from implementing a program within 90 days of a federal election to cancel the registrations of voters who are not U.S. citizens. §     Brief context: In 2022, Arizona passed two additional hurdles to voting. First, they required new voter registrants to provide a physical "documentary proof of citizenship." Secondly, Arizona enabled county recorders to conduct citizenship audits of voter registration rolls against both state and federal databases. Mi Familia Vota and others filed suit against the Republican National Committee (RNC) to block these state laws from going into effect. The Ninth Circuit sided with Mi Familia Vota. §     Consequences: Siding with the RNC to greenlight these additional hurdles would render another blow to voting access and our democracy. Such demands would screen out lower income voters, people who have changed their names, naturalized citizens, and anyone who doesn't happen to have easy ways to obtain a passport or their birth certificate. It would also open the door for other states to impose similar inequitable requirements. §     Argument: December 8, 2026   ·      LGBTQ+ Rights o      International Partners for Ethical Care, Inc. v. Ferguson (No. 25-840) §     Issue: Whether parents have standing to challenge a law or policy that deliberately displaces their decisionmaking role as to "gender transitions" of their children, and in so doing creates present and likely future impediments to their ability to parent their children as they deem best for them. §     Brief context: Washington took "modest steps to address the crisis of transgender youth homelessness" by updating its laws to allow minors in shelters to access "health care — including gender-affirming care — without contacting their parents." Staff must still make good faith efforts to notify the minor's parents and are only allowed to withhold information if sharing it would cause harm to the minor. In response, the International Partners for Ethical Care and a group of parents challenged these laws, claiming they chill speech and "deliberately displace their decision-making role." The Ninth Circuit court of appeals dismissed their case for lack of legal standing. §     Consequences: The issue of legal standing is often political, and if the Court grants these parents standing, it could open the door for special interest groups to manufacture so-called grievances to bring challenges to school curricula, library books, vaccination policies, and confidential reproductive care. ·      It would also advance yet another challenge to the medical necessity of gender-affirming care for transgender people while protecting the abuse of anti-LGBTQ+ parental rejection. §     Argument: December 7, 2026   ·      Gun Safety o      Viramontes v. Cook County (No. 25-238), consolidated with Grant v. Higgins (No. 25-566) §     Issue: Whether the Second and 14th Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles. §     Brief context: When Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya were barred from owning AR-15 style weapons after they were banned in Cook County, Illinois, they joined two gun-rights organizations and filed a suit arguing that the law banning the sale, transfer, and possession of semiautomatic rifles violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. Both an Illinois district court and the Seventh Circuit sided with Cook County and upheld the assault weapons ban. What will happen if the ban is overturned? §     Consequences: A decision overturning this ban could void other assault weapons bans in Connecticut, California, New York, and a dozen other states — bans that have drastically reduced mass shootings, including school shootings, compared to states without such bans. §     Argument: December 2, 2026   What c3s can do: ·      Supreme court advocacy is nonpartisan—you are free to stand for or against cases before any court or get involved in the cases. o      Litigation at the supreme court o      Amicus briefs o      Educating the public about cases and impacts of opinions Advocacy and lobbying work about the courts: ·      Nominee advocacy—Advocate for or against nominees to supreme court (lobbying) o      Remember the lower district courts and circuit courts as well o      Remember the lobbying rules if you are a c3: must track and report your lobbying the IRS and stay within your lobbying limits. Great place for c4s to get involved because they can lobbying in an unlimited amount. ·      Ethics advocacy—ask congress for more oversight or ethics rules (Lobbying if it will require a legislative vote). ·      Supreme court reform: increasing the size of the bench, retirement requirements, and more   Resources ·      Alliance for Justice, Being a Player ·      Alliance for Justice, Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices ·      Alliance for Justice, Judicial Nominee Tracker ·      Alliance for Justice, Supreme Court Reform ·      See more of our coverage of critical Supreme Court cases this term here.

This Day in Legal History: The Integration of Ole MissOn September 30, 1962, James Meredith, a Black Air Force veteran, was escorted onto the campus of the University of Mississippi by federal marshals to enroll under a federal court order. The university had rejected him for no reason other than his race. The Fifth Circuit ordered him admitted, and Justice Hugo Black refused to let that order be delayed. Mississippi's governor, Ross Barnett, personally blocked Meredith's registration anyway. The federal appeals court held him in contempt.After nightfall on the 30th, a crowd of students, locals, and segregationists attacked the roughly 120 marshals guarding Meredith. That night President Kennedy went on national television to explain why the federal government would enforce the order, the address today's opening quote comes from. The riot killed two people, including a French journalist, and injured hundreds. It took thousands of federal troops to end it. The next morning, Meredith registered.Listeners may remember we covered Little Rock earlier this month. Ole Miss is the same principle five years later: a federal court order is binding, even on a state determined to resist it, and the federal government will enforce it. The Constitution's guarantees mean what courts say they mean, and a governor doesn't get to veto them. That idea of judicial orders as binding law, not suggestions, has come up again and again on this show this month.The Supreme Court has let the administration resume deporting migrants to so-called third countries: nations that aren't named in their removal orders and that many of them have no connection to. In a brief order, with the three liberal justices objecting, the Court paused a February ruling by a federal district judge. That ruling required immigration authorities to give people more due process before sending them to a third country, and a federal appeals court had largely upheld it earlier this month. The administration says it has used the policy to deport tens of thousands of people to Mexico and to countries in Africa and Latin America, often after their home countries refused to take them back. The legal issue is notice and an opportunity to be heard. The challengers argue that if the government plans to send someone to a country where they may face persecution or torture, due process and the Convention Against Torture require that the person be told where they're going and get a real chance to object first. The government's position is that it has broad authority over removals and that lower courts overstepped. The Court also agreed to hear the case in full in December, and it asked the parties to brief several questions: whether the lower courts had jurisdiction at all, whether they could order nationwide relief, and whether the policy violates due process or the torture convention. Those first two questions matter well beyond immigration, because they go to the reach of federal judges' power over executive policy. For now, the deportations resume while those questions are decided. As with the SAVE voter-verification order last week, the emergency docket has put the risk of error on the people affected while the case is pending.Supreme Court lets Trump resume third-country deportations | Reuters · NPR · CBS NewsFormer special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing its Republican chairman, Chuck Grassley, titled an oversight hearing into Smith's “abuse of authority.” Smith brought the two federal criminal cases against Donald Trump: one over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and one over his handling of classified documents after his first term. Both cases were dismissed after Trump won the 2024 election. Grassley accused Smith of “rampant abuse of authority and political targeting” funded by taxpayers. Smith defended the investigations as based on evidence and Justice Department policy, not politics. He told senators he would not be silenced by “continued threats of prosecution,” and he condemned the firing and vilification of the agents and prosecutors who worked for him. Live coverage also reported him saying his investigation had shown, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Trump engaged in serious crimes. Here's the legal significance. A special counsel operates under Justice Department regulations designed to give some independence in politically sensitive investigations. When a former prosecutor faces open talk of prosecution for his own charging decisions, and his former staff are fired, the concern is less about Smith himself than about future prosecutors. Every prosecutor considering a case against a powerful person will now know that the charging decision itself can bring personal and professional consequences. Congress does have legitimate oversight power over the Justice Department. But oversight turning into retaliation is exactly what Justice Department independence norms are supposed to prevent. The hearing is another sign of how politicized federal prosecution has become.Former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith faces Senate hearing over abuse of authority accusations | Reuters · NBC News · CNNAnd finally, in my column for Bloomberg Tax this week, I take on one of the most common arguments against California's proposed wealth tax. Proposition 40 would impose a one-time 5% levy on the net worth of Californians who were billionaires at the start of this year. Opponents warn that a tax on the ultra-rich will eventually trickle down to ordinary households. My response is that ordinary households already pay a recurring tax on their largest store of wealth. It's called the property tax. Think about how it works: the government values an asset you own, applies a rate to that value, and bills you every year simply for continuing to own it. That's a tax on a stock of wealth, not on income. I ran some back-of-the-envelope numbers using Tax Foundation and Federal Reserve data. The national effective property tax rate on owner-occupied homes was about 0.91% in 2022. The median primary residence was worth about $323,000, and median housing equity was about $200,000. That works out to a property tax bill of roughly $2,900 a year, or close to 1.5% of the typical homeowner's actual equity, every year. And unlike Proposition 40, the property tax doesn't subtract your mortgage. It's charged on the full assessed value, so with a big mortgage, a nominal 1% rate can equal 5% or more of your real equity. The billionaire's wealth tax would be calculated on assets minus debts, which is more lenient on that point. My conclusion is that many homeowners would gladly trade their recurring 1.5% for a one-time 5%. So the real question isn't whether taxing wealth is acceptable in principle. It's why our appetite for it changes so much depending on what kind of wealth it is and who owns it. I'm not saying Proposition 40 is well designed. Valuing private company shares is much harder than valuing a house, and billionaires can move in a way houses can't. If the objection is really to the size and one-time structure, the better debate is whether a recurring, lower-rate tax, say 1% a year above a very high threshold, would be workable. That would look much more like the property tax system homeowners already live with, and over ten years it would raise roughly double the revenue.California Wealth Tax Trickle-Down Concerns Are Unconvincing | Bloomberg Tax This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

092926 SCOTUS Deports, Garvaghy Road March, Airbase Busts, Jack Smith Stands By by The News with Paul DeRienzo

The Supreme Court did something nice for Black voters. I'm as shocked as you are. On Sept. 25, the Court told the Eighth Circuit to knock it off and stop trying to force Missouri to use a gerrymandered 2025 congressional map that Republicans drew at Trump's urging. Imani Gandy breaks down how Missouri's secretary of state gambled and ran the primary on the wrong map, and why the Supreme Court had to tell Republicans in Missouri three times that they can't use the 2025 map—they have to use the 2022 map. Also, she explains what the Purcell principle is so you can dazzle your friends in the group chat when talking about these messy midterms. Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires. Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Baby Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. B*itch, Listen now has its own dedicated feed on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you get your podcasts. If you already subscribe to Baby Boom! Lawyered, sign up for B*tch, Listen so you won't miss it.

The Supreme Court did something nice for Black voters. I'm as shocked as you are. On Sept. 25, the Court told the Eighth Circuit to knock it off and stop trying to force Missouri to use a gerrymandered 2025 congressional map that Republicans drew at Trump's urging. Imani Gandy breaks down how Missouri's secretary of state gambled and ran the primary on the wrong map, and why the Supreme Court had to tell Republicans in Missouri three times that they can't use the 2025 map—they have to use the 2022 map. Also, she explains what the Purcell principle is so you can dazzle your friends in the group chat when talking about these messy midterms. Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires. Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Baby Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. B*itch, Listen now has its own dedicated feed on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you get your podcasts. If you already subscribe to Baby Boom! Lawyered, sign up for B*tch, Listen so you won't miss it.

This week, the NatCon Squad discusses: 00:00 - Intro 00:50 - SCOTUS Allows Voter Citizenship Verification 12:03 - Sarah Huckabee-Sanders Picks on White Men 21:16 - American Pope Awakens France 32:00 - Trump Cuts Student Loans for Degrees that Don't Pay Off 44:15 - Final Thoughts With Inez Stepman, Ben Weingarten, Will Chamberlain, and Nathan Pinkoski. Produced by the Edmund Burke Foundation.  For the latest updates, follow us on X: @natcontalk www.nationalconservatism.org

The Supreme Court's new term is packed with cases that could reshape the legal landscape on climate change, gun rights and voting.In our annual SCOTUS preview, we break down three of the term's most pivotal cases and explore how they reflect the high court's growing role in our most consequential policy disputes.First, a high-stakes climate showdown. Does Boulder County's lawsuit against fossil fuel giants Exxon and Suncor mean local governments can make energy companies pay for the costs of climate change?Next, what does the justices' Second Amendment history-and-tradition test mean for state and local bans on AR-15s?Lastly, just in time for midterms: Can Arizona require proof of citizenship to register to vote and purge voters from the rolls just before an election?Buckle up as we dive into the legal battles set to reach Washington.Special guests: Michael Gerrard, founder of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law SchoolDeirdre Macnab, Colorado rancherAdam Winkler, professor at UCLA School of LawMaureen Edobor, professor at Washington and Lee University Schol of LawThis episode was produced by Kirk McDaniel. Intro music by The Dead Pens. Editorial staff is Ryan Abbott, Sean Duffy and Jamie Ross.

The Tuesday broadcast of The Marc Cox Morning Show hosted by Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge opens with coverage of former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey stepping down as co-deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, alongside public statements released by Michael Péguy Desronvil, the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. On the St. Louis Morning Brief, the hosts report on 30-year-old Donovan Baucum Jr.'s second-degree murder guilty plea in the 2024 Interstate 55 shooting death of 16-year-old CBC hockey player Colin Brown, St. Louis's bid competing against 26 cities to host matches for the 2031 Men's Rugby World Cup at The Dome at America's Center, and courtroom security incidents at the Carnahan Courthouse. Former Missouri State Senator John Lamping evaluates state executive appointments, political strategy following the U.S. Supreme Court's redistricting order in People Not Politicians v. Onder, and reflections on the beatification Mass of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen. Fox & Friends First anchor Todd Pyro examines international security detentions, cashless bail policies, and campus safety investigations. On 2A Tuesday, Armed American Radio host Mark Walters details shifts in federal firearms enforcement under ATF Director Robert Cekada, including significant reductions in Federal Firearms License (FFL) revocations, and legal challenges against California firearm legislation. Former U.S. Ambassador to Denmark Carla Sands, Chair of Foreign Policy at the America First Policy Institute, provides geostrategic analysis on the U.S.-Greenland security agreement, Arctic defense infrastructure, and international trade relations regarding China and Canada. Wiggins America host Ryan Wiggins discusses political rhetoric from Canadian leader Mark Carney, regional sovereignty movements in Alberta, and CNN midterm election turnout polling. On Kim on a Whim (sponsored by Missouri Brush Control), the hosts analyze proposed Department of Education earnings accountability regulations for higher education loans, closing the show on In Other News (sponsored by Zerorez St. Louis) honoring actor Dennis Haskins following his passing at age 75. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #JohnLamping #AndrewBailey #CarlaSands

Hour 2 opens with Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge previewing diplomatic updates regarding Greenland agreements with Former U.S. Ambassador to Denmark Carla Sands, alongside an upcoming interview with XXXY Athletics founder Jennifer Sey. On the St. Louis Morning Brief, the hosts cover 30-year-old Donovan Baucum Jr.'s guilty plea to second-degree murder in the 2024 Interstate 55 shooting death of 16-year-old CBC High School hockey player Colin Brown, St. Louis's bid for the 2031 Men's Rugby World Cup at The Dome at America's Center, and courtroom security incidents at the Carnahan Courthouse. Former Missouri State Senator John Lamping joins the show to analyze former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey's September 28, 2026 announcement stepping down as co-deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Lamping evaluates state executive appointments under former Governor Mike Parson, the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25, 2026 redistricting order in People Not Politicians v. Onder, and the September 24, 2026 beatification Mass of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen at The Dome at America's Center. The hour closes on In Other News, sponsored by Zerorez St. Louis, honoring the life of actor Dennis Haskins following his passing at age 75. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #JohnLamping #AndrewBailey #DennisHaskins

Send us Fan MailFirst Half: Multiple lawsuits filed against states that have banned the sale of Glock pistols to the citizenry, while the majority of those states' police departments use Glocks as their duty pistol.Second Half: The DOJ is bringing suit against Minnesota and their permit-to-purchase scheme that amounts to an approximate 30-day waiting period. Then, 27 states file amicus briefs with the SCOTUS in support of the Constitution and against the "assault weapons" bans in Illinois and Connecticut, hoping to assist in attaining a Constitutional ruling when the Supreme Court takes up that landmark case soon.Freedom GunsFirearms, Ammunition, Accessories, Training classes The Gun Site9-Lane 25 yard indoor Shooting Range, Gun Store, Training classesFuel FixFilter, clean and restore fuel to prevent ignition failure and engine shutdown with Fuel Fix.Sicarios Gun ShopFirearms, Accessories, Ammo, Safes, and more!WJS GunsGun and Outdoor Shop, ammo, accessories, fishing tackle, moreSHOOTINGCLASSES.COMOnline business operations platform for firearms instructors, trainees, and Shooting RangesGlover Orndorf and Flanagan Wealth Mgmt.Wealth management servicesCounter Strike TacticalBest Little Gun Store in Melbourne, Florida! Veteran Owned and Operated 321-499-4949Ear Care of MelbourneNeed hearing aids? Go to the audiologists that gave Royce his hearing back!Control Jiu-Jitsu/MMAJiu-Jitsu/MMA Training in Melbourne, FLDisclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the showThe Watch Floor - YouTubeAskari Media GroupBuy Paul Eberle's book "Look at the Dirt"Paul Eberle (lookatthedirt.com)

On today's episode, Legal Tuesday with James, Dwayne, and Ben on the phone. Glenn is stuck on mute and cussing on the drive back from the Illuminati conference, so the green room reboots the Roadie mic and rolls without him. The guys open on the opposite of Musk: Bill Gates as an overrated Silicon Valley pirate, Ben's man-on-the-street chatter about GMO ticks and alpha-gal bioterror, and Dwayne's Grok cleanup showing three different tick species got mixed together. Then the real rocket story. Yesterday's Starbase flight lost a Raptor, burned the rest longer, dispensed 26 V3 Starlinks, hit real orbit, and still got painted as a blowup, plus a 50-foot French bronze Prometheus now guarding the Starbase gate like a half-size Statue of Liberty. DOGE's NGO money hose, teens trending straight again, Trump's swimming-pool meme for the briefing room, the Fox, Dominion, and Tucker fallout, and Bartiromo with Nick Shirley on X set up the pocketbook and case cards. That includes Abbott's 90-day red-dye diesel relief for farmers, Louisiana's push for a 90-day diesel export pause, the higher-ed bubble with Tech's Henderson out and Trump's ban on loans for degrees that don't pay, D.C.'s CVS-unlock crime index, Fetterman's "lifelong Republican" slip, SCOTUS knocking Missouri's map back, and the voter-database green light that keeps the rolls in play. Add midterm optimism, Dearborn, pocket rescission, and PJ's Exit 33 on Maple Street. Don't miss it!

Supreme Court clears way for Trump administration to use modified voter verification database#cnn #trump #theview #illegalimmigration #midterms #reactionvideo

The US government warns Americans to be cautious in the UK – after officials thwart a suspected terror attack near an air force base. Trump notches a win on voter rolls with the Supreme Court, while he prepares for aggressive campaigning in dozens of states. And, are ICE agents being told to pull back ahead of the midterms? We have the exclusive – and Homeland Security's response. Reporting from Megan Basham, Tim Rice and Jennie Taer. Get the facts first with Morning Wire.- - -Ep. 3113- - -Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3- - -Today's Sponsors:Balance of Nature - Cozy season is here... but pumpkin spice doesn't exactly count as a vegetable.

The Pour Over is a Christ-first, politically neutral news podcast. Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we cover the day's biggest stories in ~10 minutes, and pair the biggest headlines with brief biblical reminders. Looking to support us? You can choose to pay ⁠here⁠. On today's episode: Nor'easter Causes Widespread Damage SCOTUS Greenlights Voter Verification System WNBA Playoffs Tip Off Five Men Arrested on Suspected Terrorism President Trump Rejects Iran Ceasefire Plan Pope Draws Crowd of 800k Gas Explosion Kills Six in Athens U.S.-China Summit Wraps Up Thanks to our sponsors: The Voice of the Martyrs: Get a free copy of Tortured for Christ | vom.org/TPO Wild Alaskan: $35 off your first box | code: TPO Safe House Project: Give now | SafeHouseProject.org/TPO New Living Translation: Get your copy | https://links.thepourover.org/NLT_Pod Quince: Free shipping | quince.com/tpo AdelFi: Apply for the Harvest Bundle | https://adelfibanking.com/pourover Upside: extra 25 cents back for every gallon on your first tank of gas | code: TPO Life Recovery Bible: Get your copy | https://links.thepourover.org/Tyndale_Sept2026 LMNT: free 8-pack with purchase | https://links.thepourover.org/LMNT_Podcast Serving Orphans Worldwide: Give a gift to feed a child for a month | https://servingorphans.org/thepourover MORE FROM TPO: ⁠Free newsletter⁠ ⁠Watch TPO on YouTube⁠ ⁠Download the TPO App⁠ Unless otherwise noted, all scripture references are from the Christian Standard Bible (CSB) translation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's Headlines: So NATO is preparing for war, aka potential Russian aggression, with Poland and Lithuania developing cross-border civilian evacuation plans for the Baltic states and practice exercises scheduled for next week. Meanwhile, five people were arrested near a UK Royal Air Force base used by the US during the Iran war, on suspicion of planning a terrorist attack after someone spotted three suspicious vehicles heading toward the base after midnight — no names released, no country claimed responsibility, and the US embassy issued a security alert for Americans traveling in the UK. On Iran, Trump rejected Iran's latest peace proposal while claiming negotiations are continuing in New York, which sounds like nothing really. In potential voter suppression news, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 (of course)  that the Trump administration can move forward with its centralized voter citizenship verification database using Social Security data — with six weeks until the midterms, the timing is almost certainly the point. The Trump administration is scouting Grand Teton National Park for a baseball stadium because the MLB wants to host a game there, which would require major construction on some of the most protected land in the country. On the scary tech beat, OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of problematic AI security incidents — not a few rogue hacking episodes, tens of thousands — and ProPublica's investigation found that DraftKings actively recruited a journalist mimicking compulsive gambling behavior into its VIP program after he lost $1,800 in one night chasing losses. And finally, RFK Jr. accepted over $4 million in book advances and $270,000 in gifts during his year as Health Secretary, with his wife separately receiving $210,000 in "consulting fees" from the same MAHA-connected friend, because public health leadership is a great side hustle. Resources/Articles mentioned: Euronews: Poland and Lithuania preparing cross-border evacuation plan for Baltic states WaPo: 5 arrested in U.K. near base used by U.S. on suspicion of planning terror act Axios: Trump says he rejected the latest Iranian proposal SCOTUS Blog: Supreme Court clears way for Trump administration to use modified voter verification database WaPo: Trump officials weigh MLB game at Grand Teton National Park Axios: Scoop: Top AI companies probing tens of thousands of security incidents ProPublica: I Posed as a Problem Gambler. DraftKings Made Me a VIP NYT: RFK Jr. Drew $4 Million in Book Advances From Publisher Who Also Monetized MAHA Subscribe to the Betches News Room and join the Morning Announcements group chat. Go to: betchesnews.substack.com Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

A former Cornell University student is suing the university and others alleging that she was drugged and sexually assaulted by members of the Chi Phi fraternity. The Tompkins County District Attorney has now reopened the criminal investigation. We break down what the lawsuit actually alleges, why criminal charges weren't filed originally, what changed, Cornell's response, and the legal questions surrounding the university's potential liability. Then, we explain the Supreme Court's latest ruling involving the federal SAVE voter-verification database, the State Department wanting to expand the use of passport data for voter-eligibility checks, the U.S. military planning for potential action involving Cuba, and President Trump's pocket rescission of $810 million. Today's episode: 1. Everything You Need to Know About the Cornell Lawsuit (0:31) 2. Supreme Court's SAVE Voter-Verification Ruling (~27:57) 3. State Department Proposes Using Passport Records for Voter Verification (~36:47) 4. U.S. Military Plans for Possible Action in Cuba (~43:48) 5. Trump's $810M "Pocket Rescission" Explained (~47:57) 6. Quick Hitters (~56:30) 7. Critical Thinking (~1:01:41) ⁠Watch⁠ this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠TikTok⁠. All sources for this episode can be found ⁠here.⁠  PilePad: Get 10% off and FREE Shipping at ⁠PilePad.com⁠. Use promo code UNBIASED. Incogni: Scammers are everywhere! But they can't harm you, if they can't find you! Use code JORDAN at ⁠https://incogni.com/jordan⁠ and get 60% off an annual plan! Bombas: Get 20% off your first purchase by going to Bombas.com/UNBIASED and using code UNBIASED at checkout. Quince: Quince.com/UNBIASED for FREE Shipping and 365-day returns. Monarch: Use code UNBIASED at Monarch.com com to get your first year of Monarch Core half off at just $50. Rocket Money: Join at RocketMoney.com/UNBIASED. Cozy Earth: Please let them know you heard it here on UNBIASED POLITICS. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a rare win for President Trump, the Supreme Court rules in his favor that social security data can be used to verify voter citizenship in elections, as the Deep State scrambles for a reason to decry the ruling. Trump Is A Threat To Democracy! doesn't have the same ring to it that it used to. The Nor'easter that battered the east coast this weekend unearthed a 142 year old treasure on Nantucket Island off the Massachusetts coast. And a fascinating comparison of what $4 per gallon gas really buys us when stacked up against other well known liquids we all use every day.  

24:22 - Matt Rooney, Founder and Editor-in-Chief of SaveJersey.com Topic: Lt. Gov. Caldwell's resignation; Debate between Tom Kean and Rebecca Bennett 35:02 - Sheriff Shaun Golden, Monmouth County SheriffTopic: Flooding in Monmouth County and overall impact o the nor'easter 49:02 - Daniel Hoffman, Ret. CIA Senior Clandestine Services Officer and a Fox News ContributorTopic: Terror probe into UK air base used by US Air Force 58:44 - Pasquale Loporcaro, Executive Directorof the Emergency Children’s Help Organization Topic: Staten Island Spotlight 1:03:43 - Christopher Hoenig, Spokesman for JCP&L Topic: Power outages in New Jersey 1:18:10 - Jim McLaughlin, pollster for President Donald Trump, strategic consultant, and CEO and Partner of McLaughlin & Associates Topic: Polling going into the midterms; SCOTUS voter verification ruling 1:26:21- Christina Farrell, Commissioner of the NYC Office of Emergency Management Topic: Nor'easter in New York 1:29:38 - Timmy McWilliams Topic: Nor'easter in New York 1:36:09 - Hogan Gidley, Former National Press Secretary for the Trump campaign and former White House Deputy Press Secretary Topic: Recap of Trump's meeting with Xi 1:58:07 - Major James Boland, Commanding Officer for Emergency Management of New Jersey State Police Topic: Nor'easter impact in NJSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today on the show: Jonathan O'Brien on the vaping issue in Georgia schools. A former FBI agent joins us on the possible UK terror incident. Peter Charalambous from ABC News breaks down the SCOTUS voter roll ruling. Erick Erickson live on the Georgia races. Plus, a Grand for Groceries! 9am-noon on 95.5 WSB.

Today on the show: Jonathan O'Brien on the vaping issue in Georgia schools. A former FBI agent joins us on the possible UK terror incident. Peter Charalambous from ABC News breaks down the SCOTUS voter roll ruling. Erick Erickson live on the Georgia races. Plus, a Grand for Groceries! 9am-noon on 95.5 WSB.

Today on the show: Jonathan O'Brien on the vaping issue in Georgia schools. A former FBI agent joins us on the possible UK terror incident. Peter Charalambous from ABC News breaks down the SCOTUS voter roll ruling. Erick Erickson live on the Georgia races. Plus, a Grand for Groceries! 9am-noon on 95.5 WSB.

Hour 2 opens with reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25, 2026 order in People Not Politicians v. Onder, upholding Missouri's 6-2 congressional map configuration for the November 2026 general election. Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge examine judicial retention efforts organized by Freedom Principle MO regarding Missouri Supreme Court Justice Paul C. Wilson on the November 3, 2026 ballot, alongside campaign statements from MO-02 Democratic nominee Fred Wellman. On the St. Louis Morning Brief, the hosts discuss local coverage from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch regarding an immigration awareness rally in Overland organized with the Archdiocese of St. Louis, alongside controlled demolition plans by the Missouri Department of Transportation for the Chester Bridge connecting Perryville, Missouri to Chester, Illinois. Financial reporter Nicole Murray presents market analysis on Oliver Properties' $7 million Cordovan on the Park loft renovation in downtown St. Louis, energy futures, and dynamic digital price label deployment at major retailers like Walmart and Schnucks. The hour closes on In Other News, sponsored by Zerorez St. Louis, covering the passing of professional wrestler Benjamin Satterley (PAC) and viral entertainment highlights. For official voter registration resources, election district lookup tools, and sample ballots, consult the Missouri Secretary of State Elections Division. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #Redistricting #PaulWilson #NicoleMurray

Hour 3 opens with Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge reviewing national media commentary from HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher regarding border security enforcement, law enforcement metrics, and international drug interdiction operations. Senior legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation joins the broadcast to analyze the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25, 2026 emergency stay order in People Not Politicians v. Onder, confirming that Missouri will conduct its November 2026 elections under the 2022 congressional map layout. Von Spakovsky also evaluates a concurrent Supreme Court order granting state access to the Department of Homeland Security's Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database to maintain voter rolls. The hour continues with an analysis of interview excerpts broadcast on KSDK's Today in St. Louis featuring Democratic candidate Fred Wellman discussing healthcare funding policies, congressional oversight, and campaign positions in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District against incumbent U.S. Representative Ann Wagner. The segment closes on Kim on a Whim, sponsored by Missouri Brush Control, reviewing post-trial legal developments following the September 2026 mistrial declaration in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial in Massachusetts. For official voter registration resources, election district lookup tools, and sample ballots, consult the Missouri Secretary of State Elections Division. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #HansvonSpakovsky #FredWellman #AnnWagner

Hour 1 of The Marc Cox Morning Show opens with reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25, 2026 ruling in People Not Politicians v. Onder. Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge analyze the decision staying the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's mandate, establishing that Missouri's November 2026 congressional elections will proceed under the 2022 map boundaries. The hosts evaluate political fallout in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District between incumbent U.S. Representative Ann Wagner and Democratic challenger Fred Wellman. On the Marc Cox Shortlist (sponsored by RhinoShield), the hosts review Sunday morning news program exchanges featuring Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on ABC News' This Week regarding White House press access guidelines, alongside counterterrorism arrests near RAF Fairford in the United Kingdom. On Kim on a Whim, sponsored by Missouri Brush Control, the hosts discuss digital authentication and image ethics following reporting from The Stanford Review regarding AI-altered promotional materials created by Stanford Dining Services. The hour closes with analysis of financial analyst Larry Kudlow's commentary on third-quarter 2026 GDP projections from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and national wage growth. For official election information, voter registration resources, and district lookup tools, visit the Missouri Secretary of State Elections Division. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #Redistricting #ToddBlanche #LarryKudlow

Marc Cox and Kim St. Onge host the St. Louis Morning Brief, opening with reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court's September 25, 2026 ruling staying an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals order, upholding Missouri's 6-2 congressional district map layout for the November 2026 general election. The segment reviews local reporting from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch regarding an immigration awareness march in Overland organized alongside the Archdiocese of St. Louis during the World Day of Migrants and Refugees. Additional regional brief stories cover infrastructure vandalism investigations involving damaged fire hydrants across North St. Louis, controlled demolition plans by the Missouri Department of Transportation for the historic Chester Bridge connecting Perryville, Missouri to Chester, Illinois, and well wishes for community members recovering from motor vehicle accidents. For official election information, voter registration resources, and district lookup tools, visit the Missouri Secretary of State Elections Division. LISTEN TO 97.1 FM TALK LIVE IN ST LOUIS OR STREAM WORLDWIDE AT 971TALK.COM Hashtags: #971FMTalk #StLouis #STLNews #Redistricting #ArchdioceseSTL #ChesterBridge

Amy King hosts your Monday morning Wake Up Call. ABC News investigative reporter Peter Charalambous opens the show talking about SCOTUS giving the green light for Trump admin to verify voter citizenship. Amy talks with Bloomberg’s Erica Herskowitz about what we can expect from Wall Street this week. The show closes with ABC News national correspondent Jim Ryan discussing traveling and if you plan on doing so for the holidays, why you better start saving now. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: The Black Sox IndictmentOn September 28, 1920, a Chicago grand jury indicted eight members of the Chicago White Sox for conspiring to throw the 1919 World Series in exchange for money from a gambling syndicate. That morning, pitcher Eddie Cicotte and “Shoeless” Joe Jackson had reportedly confessed. The scandal—forever after known as the “Black Sox”—remains one of the most famous intersections of crime, sport, and law in American history, and its legal legacy is more instructive than the folklore suggests.Here's the twist that every law student should sit with. The eight players went to trial on criminal conspiracy charges, and in 1921, a jury acquitted all of them. But the very next day, baseball's newly installed commissioner, federal judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis, banned all eight from organized baseball for life—famously declaring that regardless of any jury verdict, no player who fixes games or consorts with gamblers would ever play professional baseball again. So you have a stark divergence: the criminal-justice system, applying its high beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard, found them not guilty, while a private governing body, applying its own rules and lower burden of proof, imposed the harshest sanction it could.The significance of September 28, 1920 is that lesson in parallel systems of accountability. Being cleared in a court of law is not the same as being cleared everywhere—private institutions, licensing bodies, and employers routinely impose their own consequences under their own standards, and they're generally entitled to. It's a theme that runs straight through today's episode, where we'll see companies held to account not by criminal courts but by state consumer-protection laws and civil juries—the many rooms, beyond the criminal courthouse, in which accountability actually happens.A jury in Santa Fe has found that Meta misled New Mexico residents about how it protected their data—and the potential penalties are genuinely staggering. This case traces back to the Cambridge Analytica scandal: the 2018 revelation that the political consulting firm, tied to the 2016 Trump campaign, harvested personal data from as many as 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app without their consent. New Mexico's attorney general sued in 2021, and after a two-week trial, the jury found that 26 of 29 statements Meta made were misleading, adding up to tens of millions of violations of the state's Unfair Practices Act—affecting essentially the entire population of the state, more than two million people. Here's where it gets eye-popping. The judge, not the jury, will now set penalties, and New Mexico is seeking the statutory maximum of $5,000 per violation. Do the math on tens of millions of violations and you get a theoretical exposure reaching into the billions—some coverage has floated figures over $200 billion, though the actual number the judge lands on will almost certainly be far lower, because courts have discretion and because due-process principles cap grossly excessive aggregate statutory penalties. That's the real legal drama here: the collision between per-violation statutory damages, designed for individual harms, and mass digital conduct affecting millions, where mechanical multiplication produces astronomical, arguably unconstitutional numbers. The significance is twofold. First, it's a powerful demonstration of state consumer-protection law as a weapon against Big Tech—New Mexico didn't need a federal privacy statute, it used its own deceptive-practices act. And second, it feeds directly into the trend we keep tracking: after years of Cambridge Analytica settlements, a jury has now actually found Meta liable to a state's entire population for deceiving them about privacy. Meta says it disagrees and will keep fighting.Meta misled consumers in case over Cambridge Analytica scandal, New Mexico jury says | Reuters · PBS News · EngadgetTikTok has settled with Alabama for at least $100 million—and up to $300 million if certain conditions are met—just days before what would have been the first state trial in the country over the platform's alleged harms to teenagers. This is a significant development in a fight we've followed closely. At least 27 other states and D.C. have sued TikTok on similar theories: that it deliberately designed its platform to be addictive to children and misled the public about how safe it is. Alabama's case was set to go before a Montgomery jury this Monday, in a trial expected to run two to three weeks and to pry open TikTok's internal workings—which is exactly the kind of exposure that tends to concentrate a company's mind on settling. And this settlement is notable not just for the money but for the injunctive relief, because the platform changes are substantial: overnight access restrictions for teen users between midnight and 6 a.m., limits on messaging and notifications overnight and during school hours, stronger age-verification, a ban on cosmetic filters for teens, a default non-personalized feed, beefed-up parental controls, and measures to keep adults from discovering teen accounts. From a legal standpoint, that injunctive component is arguably the more important half—money is a one-time cost a company TikTok's size can absorb, but forced design changes go to the heart of the business model the lawsuits target. It also connects to the whole ecosystem we've covered: the Texas ruling that TikTok misled users on child safety, the Meta addiction cases, California's Adam's Law. The significance is that TikTok, facing the prospect of airing its internal documents before a jury, chose to pay and change its product rather than risk a verdict—and it sets an expensive template that the other 27-plus states will now be measuring their own cases against.TikTok settles with Alabama ahead of first state trial over claims of teen harms | Reuters · CNBC · US NewsAnd finally, a major reversal in an arc we've tracked all month: the Supreme Court has restored the administration's mass voter-verification system, clearing states to use it ahead of the November midterms. In an unsigned emergency order, with the Court's three liberal justices dissenting, the justices blocked a lower-court order that had stopped officials from using the Department of Homeland Security's revamped SAVE system—the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database—to run sweeping citizenship checks against voter rolls. This is the very system whose block we celebrated as upheld back in early September, when the D.C. Circuit kept it frozen; now the Supreme Court has lifted that freeze, at least while the litigation continues. Recall the design: at the President's March 2025 direction, DHS linked the 40-year-old SAVE program with Social Security records to enable bulk citizenship checks identifying supposed noncitizen voters. And recall the core objections, which haven't gone away. First, privacy—the League of Women Voters and the Electronic Privacy Information Center argue the revamp violates federal privacy laws by exposing Social Security data. Second, and most alarming, accuracy—investigations in Travis County, Texas, found that somewhere between 10% and 21% of voters flagged by SAVE were actually U.S. citizens. Sit with that: a tool being used to police voter rolls weeks before an election that may wrongly flag up to one in five as noncitizens, forcing real citizens to prove their status or risk removal. Now, an emergency-docket order like this is not a ruling on the merits—it's a decision about who bears the risk while the case proceeds, and the 6-3 split tells you the majority was willing to let the system run for now. The significance is heavy: after a month of courts repeatedly blocking federal efforts to centralize control over voter rolls, the Supreme Court has, on the shadow docket and over dissent, let the most sweeping of those tools go live for the midterms—accuracy concerns and all.Supreme Court restores Trump's mass voter verification system | Reuters · NPR · CNBC This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In hour 1 of The Mark Reardon Show, Mark discusses how his weekend went, Mizzou football's loss against Mississippi State and more. Mark is later joined by Josh Hammer, syndicated columnist, Article 3 Project senior counsel, and author of Israel and Civilization, to discuss Donald Trump's strategic approach and "Art of the Deal" tactics regarding Greenland. Hammer also shares his analysis on the ongoing interest rate debate between Donald Trump and former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh. In hour 2, Sue hosts, "Sue's News" where she discusses the latest trending entertainment news, this day in history, the random fact of the day and more. Mark is later joined by Andrew Bailey, former Assistant Director of the FBI and former Missouri Attorney General, to discuss his decision to step down from his role at the FBI and return home to his family in Missouri. Bailey shares his thoughts on the agency's recent accomplishments, the importance of focusing on core law enforcement missions, and his transition back to his home state. Mark and Ethan wrap up the hour discussing Mizzou football's loss to Mississippi State and more local sports. In hour 3, Mark is joined by Brad Young, 97.1 FM Talk Chief Legal Analyst and partner at Harris, Young and Kayser, to discuss the legal aftermath of the Lindsay Clancy trial and the media attention on the holdout juror. Young also breaks down the U.S. Supreme Court's decision regarding Missouri's congressional redistricting map and examines ongoing legislative challenges in the state. Mark is later joined by Scott Warmann, local Cardinals TV host, to discuss the St. Louis Cardinals' end-of-season wrap-up and press conference. Warmann breaks down the team's performance, evaluates the development and potential of their young core players, analyzes the pitching rotation, and shares his thoughts on the upcoming Major League Baseball postseason matchups. He wraps up the show with the Audio Cut of the Day.

Dan talks about Trump's visit to Knoxville, and how busy he was the rest of the weekend, and Dan plays an interview from Friday he had with legal expert Hans Von Spakovsky | aired on Monday, September 28th, 2026 on Nashville's Morning News with Dan Mandis Produced by Samuel RutherfordSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

TERROR PLOT TARGETS U.S. BOMBER BASE IN BRITAIN! Were Iran or Islamists behind it? Why Iran is the likely motivation. And why the UK didn’t stop it earlier. SCOTUS HANDS TRUMP A MAJOR ELECTION-INTEGRITY VICTORY! Could this change how states clean their voter rolls? What can states now do with their voter rolls? And what can they do before the midterms? What’s the catch? SOCIALISM IS GAINING SUPPORT—BUT DO AMERICANS UNDERSTAND WHAT IT WOULD CHANGE? What happens to individual liberty when government power expands? What’s really at stake in America’s political shift? CALIFORNIA CREATES NEW STATE-FUNDED BENEFITS FOR TRANSGENDER AMERICANS! And for troops discharged under Trump’s trans military policy. Why should taxpayers pick up the tab? WITH FORMER CONGRESSMAN KEN BUCK & JENNIFER KELLY, GOP STRATEGIST.Support Our Mission: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=ZMGRBFGDJKRS8See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Casey McNerthney with "Crime and Punishment": A report from the King County Prosecutor's Office // Peter Charalambous on a SCOTUS ruling on voter registration // Steve Roberts on how things are shaping up as we head for the midterms // Charlie Harger Commentary on the extreme number of money the state spends on tort claim lawsuits // Listen to the final broadcast moments for Rick Rizzs // Gee Scott on the Seahawks loss yesterday in DC

Episode 5691: SCOTUS Restores President Trump's Voter Verification System; Mainstream Meltdown

SCOTUS gives Trump a win on election security, an Indianapolis teacher gets busted for running a child fight club, and a powerful Nor-easter could make landfall this weekend from New York to Massachusetts. Get the facts first with Evening Wire. - - - Ep. 3110 - - - Wake up with new Morning Wire merch: https://bit.ly/4lIubt3   - - - Privacy Policy: ⁠https://www.dailywire.com/privacy⁠ morning wire,morning wire podcast,the morning wire podcast,Georgia Howe,John Bickley,daily wire podcast,podcast,news podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Trump pulled out all the stops at the state dinner to regale the guy who is working with our enemy: Not only has China been helping Iran target and kill American soldiers, it's also been shipping Tehran component parts for drones and missile guidance systems. Senate Republicans, of course, blocked an effort to end the war as one of their last votes before the midterms. Meanwhile, election deniers keep showing us that they're going to try to monkey around with the election results in November. Plus: Alex discusses her new book about the origin story behind today's supermajority Supreme Court, and warns that Republicans may try to steal another SCOTUS seat in the lame duck Congress. Alex Wagner joins Tim Miller for the weekend pod.show notes: Alex's book, “The Steal” Tim's ‘Take' on Republican candidates trying to run from their record on the Iran war The WSJ on China shipping drone parts to Iran Tim's playlist The Bulwark's campaign to help the Haitian community of Springfield The Bulwark store

September 25, 2026, 4pm; In an emergency ruling, the Supreme Court will allow the federal government to use the SAVE citizenship database in coordination with states to find noncitizens. For more from Nicolle, follow and download her podcast, “The Best People with Nicolle Wallace,” wherever you get your podcasts.To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

SCOTUS hands President Trump a big win, and then Grace discusses why she thinks Megyn Kelly's latest take is way off. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Many Americans are losing faith in elections. Proposed solutions from across the political spectrum to restore faith in the process — early voting, mail-in ballot restrictions and voter ID laws — seem to have the opposite effect.But lack of trust in elections is a symptom of a broader problem: America is living through an era of democratic dissatisfaction. That's what the New York University law professor Richard Pildes argues on this episode of “Interesting Times.” He and the guest host, Sarah Isgur, the editor of SCOTUSblog, discuss why Americans are so worried about the midterms and how to fix our electoral system and restore trust.00:00 Existential Election Anxiety02:38 Era of Democratic Dissatisfaction04:21 Were Recent Election Reforms a Mistake?06:09 Campaign Finance Reform09:22 SCOTUS and Trump's Mail-In Ballot Executive Order13:57 Why Did Trump Target Absentee Ballots?20:32 Should There Be a National Voter Database?23:58 Proof Of Citizenship Debate29:48 What Should SCOTUS Do?35:47 Partisan Manipulation in Elections42:24 Can the Midterms Be Stolen?44:51 Closing Thoughts(A full transcript of this episode is available on the Times website.)Thoughts? Email us at interestingtimes@nytimes.com. Please subscribe to our YouTube Channel, Interesting Times with Ross Douthat. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Amazon Music. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In the fourth installment of our Hot Supreme Court Reform September series, Leah sits down with former FTC Chair Lina Khan and Lev Menand, both of Columbia Law School, to talk through ways to limit how much SCOTUS can mess with federal agencies. Lev makes the case for stripping SCOTUS of its jurisdiction over administrative law and sending those cases to a specialized court, and Lina discusses venue and standing issues—reforming who gets to sue and where.Take the Strict Scrutiny survey.New Strict merch available here.You can now listen to Strict Scrutiny for CLE credits in California, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Washington, and Oregon! More info at crooked.com/strict_cleGet tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE on November 6th in Washington, DC: Crookedcon.comBuy Melissa's book, The U.S. Constitution: A Comprehensive and Annotated Guide for the Modern ReaderBuy Leah's book, Lawless, now out in paperbackFollow us on Instagram, Threads, and BlueskyFor a transcript of an episode of Strict Scrutiny please email transcripts@crooked.com