Podcast appearances and mentions of Barron V Baltimore

*Note: The audio quality of the earliest episodes (like this one) is not the best. Sorry. Don't worry, the quality gets better in the episodes ahead as I learn the new skillset required. Audio of the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Barron v. Baltimore (1833). In a lawsuit attempting to recover financial loss, Baltimore wharf owner John Barron alleged that construction initiated by the city beginning in 1815 redirected water flow and caused so much sand to accumulate that it eventually deprived the harbor of the deep waters necessary for larger ships to use the wharf, resulting in a significant loss of profits for Mr. Barron. He sued the city to try to recover some of his financial losses. The trial court awarded him $4,500 in damages, which the Maryland appellate court struck down. The question before the Court in this case was whether the Fifth Amendment denies the states as well as the national government the right to take private property for public use without justly compensating the property owner (a.k.a. the taking clause). I omit citations when reading SCOTUS opinions to provide a better listening experience. You may access the opinion here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/32us243   Music by Epidemic Sound

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChVMA7h_JAx3pyY52-OoI4Q/join Google: FreeMe Podcast for all listening platforms. www.cominghomecoalition.com When we say that the Constitution is a racist document, this is in part of what that means. Not so much as the document itself but how white men in positions of power have opined on the meanings and twisted the narratives to fit into their agendas of control and power and most importantly protection of government over the people. The case arose from a series of street improvements made by the city of Baltimore that required diverting several small streams. As a result, large quantities of dirt and sand were swept downstream into the harbor, causing problems for wharf owners, including John Barron, who depended on deep water to accommodate vessels. His business damaged, Barron sued the city of Baltimore to compensate for his financial losses. Barron claimed that the city's activities violated the Fifth Amendment takings clause—that is, the city's development efforts effectively allowed it to take his property without just compensation. Barron sued for $20,000, but the county court awarded him only $4,500. #constitution #rights #breakingnews #news #education #mental #podcast #educationalpodcast #justice #court #crime #criminal #crimepodcast #truecrime #truecrimepodcast #truedetectives #law #attorney #state #florida #thethomasfreemeshow #freemepodcast #community #politics #america #usa #talkradio @iheartradio @applepodcasts @spotify @pandora @googlepodcasts @stitcher @spotify @tunein #thethomasfreemeshow #trendingvideos #fypapp #fyptiktok #podcastenglish #podcastflow #podcastandchill #podcastsaboutlife #podcaststolistento #podcasttofallasleepto #podcastsforselfimprovement #podcastsaboutselflove #podcastseducational #podcaststruecrime #podcastsaboutpsychology #truecrimestories #truecrimedocumentary #truecrimepodcast #truecrimeyoutubers #*youtube*22# #youtubechannel #topvideo #topvideosonyoutube #followme #crimepatrol #podcasttruehorrostories #prisonbreak #prisondocumentary --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/support

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChVMA7h_JAx3pyY52-OoI4Q/join Google: FreeMe Podcast for all listening platforms. www.cominghomecoalition.com If you havent heard yet, Tanawah Downing is the hottest thing out right now in challenging the Supreme Court in these draconian rulings we still preside under and operate on today and you can hear him on my podcast breaking down the Constitution (which will be aired on this channel very soon..) When we say that the Constitution is a racist document, this is in part of what that means. Not so much as the document itself but how white men in positions of power have opined on the meanings and twisted the narratives to fit into their agendas of control and power and most importantly protection of government over the people. The case arose from a series of street improvements made by the city of Baltimore that required diverting several small streams. As a result, large quantities of dirt and sand were swept downstream into the harbor, causing problems for wharf owners, including John Barron, who depended on deep water to accommodate vessels. His business damaged, Barron sued the city of Baltimore to compensate for his financial losses. Barron claimed that the city's activities violated the Fifth Amendment takings clause—that is, the city's development efforts effectively allowed it to take his property without just compensation. Barron sued for $20,000, but the county court awarded him only $4,500. #constitution #rights #breakingnews #news #education #mental #podcast #educationalpodcast #justice #court #crime #criminal #crimepodcast #truecrime #truecrimepodcast #truedetectives #law #attorney #state #florida #thethomasfreemeshow #freemepodcast #community #politics #america #usa #talkradio @iheartradio @applepodcasts @spotify @pandora @googlepodcasts @stitcher @spotify @tunein #thethomasfreemeshow #trendingvideos #fypapp #fyptiktok #podcastenglish #podcastflow #podcastandchill #podcastsaboutlife #podcaststolistento #podcasttofallasleepto #podcastsforselfimprovement #podcastsaboutselflove #podcastseducational #podcaststruecrime #podcastsaboutpsychology #truecrimestories #truecrimedocumentary #truecrimepodcast #truecrimeyoutubers #*youtube*22# #youtubechannel #topvideo #topvideosonyoutube #followme #crimepatrol #podcasttruehorrostories #prisonbreak #prisondocumentary --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/support

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChVMA7h_JAx3pyY52-OoI4Q/join Google: FreeMe Podcast for all listening platforms. www.cominghomecoalition.com When we say that the Constitution is a racist document, this is in part of what that means. Not so much as the document itself but how white men in positions of power have opined on the meanings and twisted the narratives to fit into their agendas of control and power and most importantly protection of government over the people. The case arose from a series of street improvements made by the city of Baltimore that required diverting several small streams. As a result, large quantities of dirt and sand were swept downstream into the harbor, causing problems for wharf owners, including John Barron, who depended on deep water to accommodate vessels. His business damaged, Barron sued the city of Baltimore to compensate for his financial losses. Barron claimed that the city's activities violated the Fifth Amendment takings clause—that is, the city's development efforts effectively allowed it to take his property without just compensation. Barron sued for $20,000, but the county court awarded him only $4,500. #constitution #rights #breakingnews #news #education #mental #podcast #educationalpodcast #justice #court #crime #criminal #crimepodcast #truecrime #truecrimepodcast #truedetectives #law #attorney #state #florida #thethomasfreemeshow #freemepodcast #community #politics #america #usa #talkradio @iheartradio @applepodcasts @spotify @pandora @googlepodcasts @stitcher @spotify @tunein #thethomasfreemeshow #trendingvideos #fypapp #fyptiktok #podcastenglish #podcastflow #podcastandchill #podcastsaboutlife #podcaststolistento #podcasttofallasleepto #podcastsforselfimprovement #podcastsaboutselflove #podcastseducational #podcaststruecrime #podcastsaboutpsychology #truecrimestories #truecrimedocumentary #truecrimepodcast #truecrimeyoutubers #*youtube*22# #youtubechannel #topvideo #topvideosonyoutube #followme #crimepatrol #podcasttruehorrostories #prisonbreak #prisondocumentary --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/support

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChVMA7h_JAx3pyY52-OoI4Q/join Google: FreeMe Podcast for all listening platforms. www.cominghomecoalition.com If you havent heard yet, Tanawah Downing is the hottest thing out right now in challenging the Supreme Court in these draconian rulings we still preside under and operate on today and you can hear him on my podcast breaking down the Constitution (which will be aired on this channel very soon..) When we say that the Constitution is a racist document, this is in part of what that means. Not so much as the document itself but how white men in positions of power have opined on the meanings and twisted the narratives to fit into their agendas of control and power and most importantly protection of government over the people. The case arose from a series of street improvements made by the city of Baltimore that required diverting several small streams. As a result, large quantities of dirt and sand were swept downstream into the harbor, causing problems for wharf owners, including John Barron, who depended on deep water to accommodate vessels. His business damaged, Barron sued the city of Baltimore to compensate for his financial losses. Barron claimed that the city's activities violated the Fifth Amendment takings clause—that is, the city's development efforts effectively allowed it to take his property without just compensation. Barron sued for $20,000, but the county court awarded him only $4,500. #constitution #rights #breakingnews #news #education #mental #podcast #educationalpodcast #justice #court #crime #criminal #crimepodcast #truecrime #truecrimepodcast #truedetectives #law #attorney #state #florida #thethomasfreemeshow #freemepodcast #community #politics #america #usa #talkradio @iheartradio @applepodcasts @spotify @pandora @googlepodcasts @stitcher @spotify @tunein #thethomasfreemeshow #trendingvideos #fypapp #fyptiktok #podcastenglish #podcastflow #podcastandchill #podcastsaboutlife #podcaststolistento #podcasttofallasleepto #podcastsforselfimprovement #podcastsaboutselflove #podcastseducational #podcaststruecrime #podcastsaboutpsychology #truecrimestories #truecrimedocumentary #truecrimepodcast #truecrimeyoutubers #*youtube*22# #youtubechannel #topvideo #topvideosonyoutube #followme #crimepatrol #podcasttruehorrostories #prisonbreak #prisondocumentary --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thethomasfreemepodcast/support

    Back on Slam the Gavel is a return guest, Michael Sayen, author,  who enlightens us on the historical evolution of corruption within the Family Court System.  From the 1857 Matrimonial Clause in England, women wanted the right to Divorce and Parliament agreed and that took the authority away from the church. This action found it's way to the United States shortly after.     Michael explains how Marriage Licenses evolved and how the Marriage License is Unconstitutional.   We also talked about Barron v. Baltimore of 1833 and how it defiled our unalienable rights by making it limited to Federal issues.     The evolution of Family Court by design was originally through Civil Courts called "Special Interest Courts."  However, Troxel v Granville made family court regarding parents rights a federal issue. This had a big impact in the Family Court System.  The government began to infiltrate the family home. The object was to take the child out of the family home and incentivize with Title IV-D and E.      On a positive note, 50/50 Shared Custody  Bills would be put into the hands of the Federal Court for regulation to prosecute Judges and reverse decisions. To reach Michael Sayen: mikesayen@hotmail.comMusic Provided by: mictechmusic@yahoo.com

Back on Slam the Gavel is a return guest, Michael Sayen, author, who enlightens us on the historical evolution of corruption within the Family Court System. From the 1857 Matrimonial Clause in England, women wanted the right to Divorce and Parliament agreed and that took the authority away from the church. This action found it's way to the United States shortly after. Michael explains how Marriage Licenses evolved and how the Marriage License is Unconstitutional. We also talked about Barron v. Baltimore of 1833 and that it is a landmark case which helped define the concept of federalism in the US constitutional law. The evolution of Family Court by design was originally through Civil Courts called "Special Interest Courts." However, supremacy with Federal Government was not the case in the year 2000 with the case Troxel v. Granville. This had a big impact in the Family Court System. The government began to infiltrate the family home. The object was to take the child out of the family home and incentivize with Title IV-D and E. On a positive note, 50/50 Shared Custody Bills would be put into the hands of the Federal Court for regulation to prosecute Judges and reverse decisions. To reach Michael Sayen: mikesayen@hotmail.com Music Provided by: mictechmusic@yahoo.com https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig's wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig’s wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig’s wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig’s wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig’s wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

William Davenport Mercer‘s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. Baltimore and the Foundations of American Liberty (University of Oklahoma Press, 2017) argues that if we want to understand how Americans in the early Republic viewed the sources of their rights, we need look no further than the mud at the bottom of Baltimore harbor. In the early nineteenth century, two men, John Barron, Jr. and John Craig, decided to buy a Baltimore wharf on credit. They were hoping to capitalize on rapidly-expanding commercial growth in city in the wake of the War of 1812. Instead, the city diverted water into the harbor, leaving Barron and Craig’s wharf silted up and the pair with a pile of debt. The men sued, and eventually their case was argued before the Supreme Court. The decision in Barron v. Baltimore, as William Davenport Mercer shows, marked a key development in the history of American constitutionalism. In arguing that the Bill of Rights (and thus, the Fifth Amendment) applied only at the Federal level, the court rejected a multi-sourced view of liberties. The contentious politics of the era, Dr. Mercer argues, precipitated our modern turn toward locating the sources of rights exclusively in documents. Dr. Mercer teaches history and law at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices