Podcasts about Federal

Luigi Mangione getting ready to stand trial for the shooting of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson will reportedly be pleady guilty to Fedral charges. Pleading guilty to Federal charges will alleviate the need to be prosecuted by the State. Why is this being done? Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

It's Thursday, August 13th, A.D. 2026. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Jonathan Clark and Adam McManus Haitian gangs target churches Violent gangs in Haiti are increasingly targeting churches. These gangs control up to 90 percent of the capital of Port-au-Prince. They have killed and kidnapped religious leaders and shut down dozens of churches.  Catholic Bishop Joseph Gontrand Décoste told Aid to the Church in Need, “We are the last remaining retaining wall: moral, ethical, spiritual, and prophetic. … That is why they want to eliminate us.” Christians help victims of Columbia's earthquake Christians are bringing disaster relief to Colombia.  A 7.4-magnitude earthquake struck the South American country on Monday. The quake killed 250 people and injured thousands more.  Many Christian relief organizations are sending aid to the country, including Samaritan's Purse. Franklin Graham, the president, wrote on X, “We … are currently working to put together an airlift of relief supplies, including emergency shelter tarp and hygiene kits. I encourage you to pray for the people of this country.” Hebrews 13:16 says, “Do not forget to do good and to share, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased.” Send a much-needed donation to the Columbian victims of this earthquake through Samaritan's Purse. You'll find the donation link in our transcript today at www.TheWorldview.com. Mexican Bible Society translates Scriptures into 8 local languages The Bible Society of Mexico is celebrating six decades of ministry this year. The Bible has been translated into eight indigenous languages in the country. And the demand for Bibles is growing as Protestant churches expand their presence.  Efraín Amaro is the head of distribution of the Bible society. He told Christian Daily International, “In 60 years, more than 374 million biblical materials have been distributed. We have reached 13 cities across the country with service and distribution centers.” Revelation 7:9-10 says, “After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, saying, ‘Salvation belongs to our God Who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!'” White House Press Secretary Karolien Leavitt embraces motherhood White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, age 28, will be leaving her position to fully embrace motherhood. She and her 60-year-old husband, Nicholas Riccio, have two children together -- their son Niko, 2, and Viviana who is three months. In a Truth Social post, President Donald Trump explained that she “will be departing her role at the end of the month so she can spend more time with her beautiful young children and family, a decision I totally understand and respect!” In a statement on X, Leavitt added, “Serving as the White House Press Secretary over the past year and a half has been the honor and adventure of a lifetime. I am incredibly grateful to President Trump for granting me so many extraordinary opportunities, such as working in the West Wing and spending countless hours in the Oval Office, flying around the world and meeting foreign leaders, and traveling across our beautiful country and meeting Americans from all walks of life. “The truth is, since returning to the White House after the birth of my daughter, I have felt in my heart that I cannot be the best mom my two young children deserve while devoting the constant time, energy, and attention required of the White House Press Secretary. And that is why I have ultimately made the bittersweet decision to depart the White House.” Titus 2:4-5 says, “Train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled.” Democrat socialist barely defeated in Wisconsin Socialist Democrats suffered a setback in Wisconsin on Tuesday. Moderate David Crowley barely defeated socialist Francesca Hong in the Democrat primary election for governor. According to NBC, the vote was 39.8% vs 39.3%. Just 3,796 votes separated the two in the statewide race. Leftist candidates had been winning many Democrat primaries this year. Despite being considered a moderate, Crowley believes that killing unborn babies is “healthcare” and must be “protected at all costs.” He made this comment in his victory speech. CROWLEY: “Every one of us has something much bigger to unite around. And that is keeping [Make America Great Again] extremism from bringing the chaos we see in Washington into our neighborhoods right here in the state of Wisconsin. From the very first day that I announced this campaign, I said the real threat wasn't any of my primary opponents. The real opponent has always been Tom Tiffany. That remains true today.” Tiffany, the Republican nominee for Wisconsin governor, is currently a member of Congress. The Washington Examiner reports that new Democratic-affiliated polling shows Crowley beating Tiffany by three points this fall, though the race is within the margin of error. Crowley leads Tiffany 47% to 44%, according to the poll by Protect Our Wisconsin, a group backed by the Democratic Governors Association.  Federal gov't gave mega money to religious migrant resettlement groups The federal government funded major religious groups with hundreds of millions of dollars in migrant resettlement grants. The data comes from Brian Chau, the founder of Efforts News. Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk brought attention to this research in a post on X this week. In one case, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops received over $180 million dollars in migrant resettlement grants in 2024. That was over 80 percent of the group's revenue at the time. The contracts ended last year after the Trump administration cut funding to such programs.  Women hold more jobs than men in America Women now hold more jobs than men in the U.S economy.  A report from Indeed's Hiring Lab found the number of jobs held by men declined by 142,000 between February 2025 and February 2026. Over the same period, the number of jobs held by women grew by 298,000.   The report noted, “More jobs are held by women than men in the non-farm economy, not because of a recession, but because of years of eroding male labor force participation.” Americans become skeptical of capitalism Americans are becoming less positive toward capitalism. A new Gallup survey found 54 percent of U.S. adults said they have a positive image of capitalism. That's down from 61 percent in 2010. Thirty-nine percent said they have a positive image of socialism. That's up from 36 percent in 2010. The drop in positivity toward capitalism has accelerated since 2021. Americans trust small, local businesses and churches And finally, Americans tend to trust small, local institutions, according to research from the Barna Group.  U.S. adults put some of their highest trust in local businesses, individual Christians, and small churches. They put moderate trust in Christian pastors, Christian non-profits, and Christian businesses. But they had little trust for megachurches and celebrity pastors.  Compared to 2024, Christian non-profits, charities, and small churches saw the largest growth on the trust index.  Close And that's The Worldview on this Thursday, August 13th, in the year of our Lord 2026. Subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  Plus, you can get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

Federal buyers control only one part of a contract, the requirement, and most program staff have never been trained to write a performance work statement, so the document that decides the winner is often written before a solicitation ever posts. Ryan breaks down how a small vendor shapes that requirement through market research and a sources sought response, so the eventual bid is scoped so tightly that competitors read it and walk away. What you'll learn in this episode: The one part of the contract the government customer actually controls, and why it decides the winner How to hand a customer a sample performance work statement they can drop straight into the solicitation The difference between market research you can share and the requirement you legally cannot write for them Why a woman-owned small business set-aside is one of the strongest scoping tools available, and how agencies use it How to read a posted solicitation and spot when it was already lined up for a specific vendor Chapters: 0:00 - Finding the contract across 70 places most vendors miss 1:00 - Why the commander cannot sign a contract and who can 1:30 - The only thing the customer controls is the requirement 2:15 - Handing over a sample requirement as market research 3:30 - Building a hyperscoped statement so only you qualify 5:30 - Nudging a contract toward a WOSB or SDVOSB set-aside 6:40 - Why agencies never meet their woman-owned goals 8:00 - Reading a solicitation that was already scoped for someone   Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

Jeffrey Epstein was reportedly in possession of firearms at his Zorro Ranch in New Mexico even after his 2008 Florida felony conviction, raising questions about why he was never prosecuted for what authorities themselves had identified as potentially illegal gun possession. The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission cited documentation indicating that Epstein maintained control over firearms at the ranch after becoming a convicted felon. A July 2009 policy concerning security at Epstein's properties specifically noted his felony status and acknowledged that federal law prohibited convicted felons from knowingly possessing firearms or ammunition. The commission also reported that Epstein had weapons spread across multiple properties, including residences in Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and that he had previously held a concealed-carry license.The records suggested Epstein was well aware that his conviction created problems for his ability to legally possess guns. In 2014, he emailed attorney Erika Kellerhals asking whether his civil rights could be restored so that he could own a firearm, and she reportedly told him that he could not and instead suggested hiring armed security. Other records indicated that Epstein closely tracked where weapons were stored and had previously instructed employees regarding firearms at his properties. The revelations add another unanswered question to Epstein's post-conviction treatment: despite documentation suggesting that authorities knew a convicted felon continued to exercise control over firearms, there was apparently no resulting federal firearms prosecution before his 2019 arrest on sex-trafficking charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Was in 'Possession of Firearms' Even After 2008 ConvictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Today on The Amber May Show, we're following the stories that raise serious questions about government accountability, the economy, immigration, education and the direction of the Democratic Party. Newly released documents reveal the FBI treated Biden-Ukraine allegations as potential Russian disinformation without first fully investigating whether the claims were true. We'll break down what the “Round River” operation reportedly uncovered and why the FBI's handling of that information matters. We'll also look at encouraging economic numbers. Inflation cooled in July, gasoline and grocery prices fell, and prescription drug prices dropped for the fifth month this year. Then we turn to immigration fraud. Federal prosecutors say they busted a massive operation that allegedly arranged around 1,000 sham marriages, primarily involving Chinese nationals seeking immigration status. At the same time, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says a new birth-tourism task force has revoked more than 600 visas in roughly one month. We'll also discuss a bipartisan proposal that would increase benefits for severely disabled veterans by $833 a month, and why the legislation has stalled in the Senate. Plus, California has lost nearly half a million public-school students in about a decade. We'll examine falling birth rates, families leaving the state, school choice and the growing connection between housing costs and where your children can attend school. Join Me On Telegram https://t.me/theambermayshow Podcast Like A PRO https://podcast-like-a-pro.trainercentralsite.com Promocode Amber Discord https://discord.gg/kUsDba4zRj https://discord.com/channels/1331829063400034435/1331829063869792308 The Amber May Show Theme Song https://suno.com/song/87e27080-4ddb-47f7-8722-b00b251e6c84 Get AMAZING Amber May Merchandise https://www.ambermayshow.com/amazing-products Follow Me on Pickax https://pickax.com/?referralCode=gb4e11n&refSource=copy Get all your My Pillow Products at a DISCOUNT www.mypillow.com/amber Use Promo Code AMBER and save up to 66% off Promo code-AMBER 800-957-2123 Get Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and SAVE Dr Stella Immanuel https://marketplace.drstellamd.com/amber-may Use Promo Code AmberMay and save Become An Affiliate with Dr Stella https://rehoboth-medical-cli.trackdesk.com/sign-up?referralAccountId=1f8c94aa-933e-4aa8-ac5b-5a8d9a0d4508 Save Money When Using A Patient Advocate In The Medical System https://www.graithcare.com/?ref=Amber Take Control of Your Health & Healing! Get the full celebration of solutions that happened at Healing For The A.G.E.S. Over 20 hours of ground-breaking, life-changing, information you've never heard before, and can't get anywhere else! https://healingfortheages.com/ use promocode Amber Patriot Mobile- Free Activation When you become a Patriot Mobile member, your dollars are helping to fund our God-given right to freedom. A portion of every dollar we earn is given back to the causes that support organizations that fight for First Amendment Religious Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms, Sanctity of Life, and the needs of our Veterans and First Responders. https://www.patriotmobile.com/amber/ Use Promocode AMBER Our Exodus supplement nourishes your body with potent biblical ingredients, supporting your physical and spiritual journey. Https://exodusstrong.com?a_aid=Amber Become an Exodus Affilate Https://exodusstrong.com/pages/champions?a_aid=Amber The Flynn Movie https://www.flynnmovie.com/ref/azladyz/ War On Truth Movie You've been told that J6 was a violent insurrection against the United States by a group of angry, fringe, MAGA supporters… What if it wasn't? What if there really was a War on Truth? https://hisglory.tv/?ref=448 Promocode MAY Patrick Byrne, the founder/CEO of Overstock.com, rose to the height of financial success and was once heralded as a Wall Street prophet. However, in 2019, Byrne seemingly slipped into madness — stepping down from his multi-billion dollar company, claiming to be a covert government asset trapped in a deadly game of political espionage https://enemywithindocuseries.com/ref/amber Promocode AMBER Is it possible with Turbo Cancers on the rise and Big Pharma's reputation at zero, that Americans are finally ready to hear the truth about Cancer? Are you ready? In the 70's a Doctor working for a National Cancer Institute discovered that Apricot seeds, which contain B-17, actually slowed the growth of tumors. https://rncstore.com/ambermay Ensure the health of the indoor air quality in your home investing in good air purifiers to eliminate pollutants and allergens. Find adjunctive therapies to cancer and better health with red light and methylene blue found in the link below! https://airwaterhealing.com/#May Promocode May Supermassive Black Coffee Use Promocode AMBER https://www.supermassiveblackcoffee.com/ Find Where we air our show here: https://www.ambermayshow.com/

Today on The Amber May Show, we're following the stories that raise serious questions about government accountability, the economy, immigration, education and the direction of the Democratic Party. Newly released documents reveal the FBI treated Biden-Ukraine allegations as potential Russian disinformation without first fully investigating whether the claims were true. We'll break down what the “Round River” operation reportedly uncovered and why the FBI's handling of that information matters. We'll also look at encouraging economic numbers. Inflation cooled in July, gasoline and grocery prices fell, and prescription drug prices dropped for the fifth month this year. Then we turn to immigration fraud. Federal prosecutors say they busted a massive operation that allegedly arranged around 1,000 sham marriages, primarily involving Chinese nationals seeking immigration status. At the same time, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says a new birth-tourism task force has revoked more than 600 visas in roughly one month. We'll also discuss a bipartisan proposal that would increase benefits for severely disabled veterans by $833 a month, and why the legislation has stalled in the Senate. Plus, California has lost nearly half a million public-school students in about a decade. We'll examine falling birth rates, families leaving the state, school choice and the growing connection between housing costs and where your children can attend school. Join Me On Telegram https://t.me/theambermayshow Podcast Like A PRO https://podcast-like-a-pro.trainercentralsite.com Promocode Amber Discord https://discord.gg/kUsDba4zRj https://discord.com/channels/1331829063400034435/1331829063869792308 The Amber May Show Theme Song https://suno.com/song/87e27080-4ddb-47f7-8722-b00b251e6c84 Get AMAZING Amber May Merchandise https://www.ambermayshow.com/amazing-products Follow Me on Pickax https://pickax.com/?referralCode=gb4e11n&refSource=copy Get all your My Pillow Products at a DISCOUNT www.mypillow.com/amber Use Promo Code AMBER and save up to 66% off Promo code-AMBER 800-957-2123 Get Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and SAVE Dr Stella Immanuel https://marketplace.drstellamd.com/amber-may Use Promo Code AmberMay and save Become An Affiliate with Dr Stella https://rehoboth-medical-cli.trackdesk.com/sign-up?referralAccountId=1f8c94aa-933e-4aa8-ac5b-5a8d9a0d4508 Save Money When Using A Patient Advocate In The Medical System https://www.graithcare.com/?ref=Amber Take Control of Your Health & Healing! Get the full celebration of solutions that happened at Healing For The A.G.E.S. Over 20 hours of ground-breaking, life-changing, information you've never heard before, and can't get anywhere else! https://healingfortheages.com/ use promocode Amber Patriot Mobile- Free Activation When you become a Patriot Mobile member, your dollars are helping to fund our God-given right to freedom. A portion of every dollar we earn is given back to the causes that support organizations that fight for First Amendment Religious Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms, Sanctity of Life, and the needs of our Veterans and First Responders. https://www.patriotmobile.com/amber/ Use Promocode AMBER Our Exodus supplement nourishes your body with potent biblical ingredients, supporting your physical and spiritual journey. Https://exodusstrong.com?a_aid=Amber Become an Exodus Affilate Https://exodusstrong.com/pages/champions?a_aid=Amber The Flynn Movie https://www.flynnmovie.com/ref/azladyz/ War On Truth Movie You've been told that J6 was a violent insurrection against the United States by a group of angry, fringe, MAGA supporters… What if it wasn't? What if there really was a War on Truth? https://hisglory.tv/?ref=448 Promocode MAY Patrick Byrne, the founder/CEO of Overstock.com, rose to the height of financial success and was once heralded as a Wall Street prophet. However, in 2019, Byrne seemingly slipped into madness — stepping down from his multi-billion dollar company, claiming to be a covert government asset trapped in a deadly game of political espionage https://enemywithindocuseries.com/ref/amber Promocode AMBER Is it possible with Turbo Cancers on the rise and Big Pharma's reputation at zero, that Americans are finally ready to hear the truth about Cancer? Are you ready? In the 70's a Doctor working for a National Cancer Institute discovered that Apricot seeds, which contain B-17, actually slowed the growth of tumors. https://rncstore.com/ambermay Ensure the health of the indoor air quality in your home investing in good air purifiers to eliminate pollutants and allergens. Find adjunctive therapies to cancer and better health with red light and methylene blue found in the link below! https://airwaterhealing.com/#May Promocode May Supermassive Black Coffee Use Promocode AMBER https://www.supermassiveblackcoffee.com/ Find Where we air our show here: https://www.ambermayshow.com/

Federal agencies signal upcoming contract dollars through the president's budget months before a solicitation ever posts, and the FY2027 budget was published just weeks ago. Tracy Marcinowski, a former Air Force contracting officer who rose to Assistant Commissioner for Acquisitions at GSA's Public Building Service, a $4 billion organization, walks through how a small business reads that budget to find where the money is going before competitors do. What you'll learn in this episode: Why a signed GSA schedule or OASIS Plus contract can carry zero obligated dollars, and what you still have to do after you win one How to read the president's budget to spot which agencies and programs will have money next year Where federal spending data went after SAM.gov absorbed FPDS and USASpending, and how to pull it now Which GSA vehicle actually fits your business, and why the schedules are often the wrong first move The right people to reach inside an agency, program managers and requirements owners, not the CEO Chapters: 0:00 - Tracy Marcinowski's path from Air Force to GSA 3:00 - Why the government does not buy everything 9:00 - The vendor who pitched the wrong buyer six times 11:30 - Who inside an agency actually shapes requirements 15:30 - Choosing a contract vehicle that fits what you sell 17:30 - Starting research with the president's budget 23:30 - Why GSA is the easiest agency to break into 25:00 - CMMC, NIST, and Department of War requirements 32:30 - Action steps for a first-time small business Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In this episode, Miller Johnson employment attorneys Rebecca Strauss and Sarah Willey discuss the federal government's decision to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance and why that seemingly simple change could have significant implications for employers. Tune in as we explore: • What marijuana's Schedule III classification means under federal law • Why medical marijuana may now trigger ADA accommodation obligations • Managing remote employees and impairment concerns • Policy updates employers should consider now From drug-testing programs and workplace policies to ADA accommodation requests and impairment determinations, this episode explores how employers should rethink their approach to medical marijuana in states where its use is permitted. Rebecca and Sarah break down what has changed, what has not changed, and the practical steps HR leaders should be considering now.

Listeners may be familiar with a quote from Frederick the Great, "He who defends everything, defends nothing."   Federal leaders understand this all too well. As they are deluged with data, attacks, and new technology on a daily basis, it can be confusing what to prioritize and in trying to defend everything, agencies can be left vulnerable to attack.   In this week's episode of Feds At The Edge, several thought leaders share how they set priorities, leverage existing tools, and experiment with new solutions to enhance efficiency and security.   Bridget Carper-Arnone of the Department of Energy discusses how Enterprise License Agreements and centralized governance can reduce costs and streamline compliance across multiple systems. SEC's Jeff King emphasizes the value of understanding existing tools, noting that a deeper dive with vendors can uncover capabilities agencies may already have. While Emilio Escobar from DataDog highlights observability and AI as keys to modernization, explaining how greater visibility into the technology environment can help agencies deploy resources more effectively. Tune in on your favorite podcast platform to hear federal technology leaders share practical strategies for prioritizing investments, maximizing existing tools, and modernizing with greater efficiency and security.  

In the summer of 2026, the SAS Innovate Tour arrived in Washington, DC, at Convene Hamilton Square.  50 years have gone by since SAS launched with a contract from the Department of Agriculture just down the street. It seemed appropriate to sit down with Caroline Baldwin, the Director, SAS Federal, to discuss how SAS delivers trusted AI for the federal government. Everybody reading this has seen reports of AI giving hallucinations. It is one thing to have a bad response for a doughnut company in Chicago; quite another to have the Department of War base decisions on bad data. Caroline Baldwin brings a refreshing splash of reality to the talk of applied AI to the federal government.   Instead of evaluating the nuances of AI harnessing, she makes a blunt statement, "If government can't apply AI to outcomes for an agency or improve American lives, it's just a science project." Finally, we have a practical opinion. SAS has been working with sensitive federal data for fifty years and has the experience to ingest accurate data and use it to produce practical results for federal agencies. We have heard of the "black box" of AI.  Don't ask for sources.  In Baldwin's experience, an AI system must be able to produce sources for decisions that will be held up in court. During the interview, she mentioned that SAS can leverage synthetic data to produce more accurate models. She also describes how SAS partners with federal agencies to solve complex problems, adapt commercial innovations, and accelerate adoption. As AI evolves, agencies must balance enterprise strategies with mission-level needs while continuously updating models and maintaining trust.  

PNL UPRN Seg#92 Ghost Gossip Guest Ashley "GG" Tue Aug 11,2026 at 5 pm EST Guest Bio: PNL Podcast (Paranormal NL) located in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada with Host Jen Noseworthy -S4/E32-UPRN Segment #92. “Ghost Gossip” special Pre-recorded event with a YouTube Live-Chat Watch-Party on UPRN. PNL Host Jen Noseworthy talks with Guest: Ashley (AKA “GG”) from South Carolina, USA Guest Ashley lovingly known by the Paranormal Community as “GG”, is the creator and host of Ghost Gossip. It's a Paranormal podcast she launched in 2022 while living in a haunted house. A former Federal court professional turned full-time stay-at-home mom of three, she blends curiosity, spirituality, and a love of storytelling to explore real-life hauntings and unexplained experiences. Ashley is passionate about creating a welcoming, judgment-free space for believers, skeptics, and the simply curious alike. Follow GG on her linktree https://linktr.ee/ghostgossippodcast Shout out to Paranormal Paul from Paranormal Among Us and the Island of Misfit Toys. Paul was on PNL S4/E17 (UPRN Seg#17). Big shout out to UPRN Producer, Manager Michelle Desrochers. Michelle is also host of The Outer Realm Radio & Beyond the Outer Realm on UPRN www.linktr.ee/michelledesrochers_ PNL believes in highlighting international Paranormal people, places, and things. PNL believes in promoting global Paranormal-Networking & Paranormal tourism. Thank-you to all the PNL Podcast Alumni-Network guests from season One 2023, Season Two 2024, Season Three 2025, Season Four 2026, and our UPRN & PNL subscribers. PNL Podcast is sponsored by the BOG team. It's a “Boots On Ground” (BOG) Paranormal investigation team doing local historic investigations in Newfoundland. BOG had two sold out Public Ghost hunts at the Torbay History House & Museum. PNL & BOG were also highlighted on local TV CBC & NTV news. If you find yourself coming back to the @PNL_BOG Team channel and you Like the content. Comment & Smash that SUBSCRIBE button. Gratitude. It all helps. Follow PNL Podcast & the BOG team on our Linktree ⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠https://linktr.ee/paranormalnlpodcast⁠ PNL airs every Tue at 5pm EST on all digital platforms of UPRN (United Public Radio Network) 107.7 FM New Orleans & 105.3 Gulf Coast https://www.youtube.com/@PNL_Podcast/streams and ⁠⁠⁠https://www.uprntalkradio.com⁠⁠⁠ PNL also Replays every Tue at 6pm EST on all digital platforms of PNL (Spotify, iHeart Radio, Amazon Music, Pocketcasts and their own YouTube Channel: “PNL Podcast & BOG team” https://www.youtube.com/@PNL_BOG Follow PNL Podcast & the BOG team on their Linktree & Smash those SUBSCRIBE buttons. It all helps. Gratitude. https://linktr.ee/paranormalnlpodcast The Paranormal (PNL) NL Podcast & BOG Team Official hangout is our Facebook "Group"-(not the Facebook Page-that's just for Instagram drops). Check out the “featured” section of the “Group” for upcoming guests on the show. It's a Certified safe space (via “Safe Space Alliance”). It's an inclusive, and fun paranormal place where you can interact with global like-minded paranormal people. Grab your official PNL Podcast & PNL BOG Team Merch at Tee-Public. https://www.teepublic.com/stores/paranormal-nl-podcast Get seasonal & customized Merch like hats, hoodies, T-shirts, bags, mugs, logos, pillows, cell phone covers, stickers & more. Logos & Music designed by PNL Podcast Alumni-Network & BOG Team member Robert Dumond. Download the BOG Team Music available now on all streaming music & social media platforms. Follow PNL Podcast & the BOG team on their Linktree & Smash those SUBSCRIBE buttons. Gratitude. It all helps ⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠https://linktr.ee/paranormalnlpodcast⁠ If you like the intro video and you'd like one of your own reach out to Alien8UK Andy Booth with PNL discount code "JSV" for one of your own.United Public Radio & UFO Paranormal Radio www.uprntalkradio.com

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After Anna Kepner died on a Carnival cruise ship, her stepmother made a decision that says everything. She sent her son, Timothy Hudson, to live with a relative, and per People magazine's reporting, the stated purpose was removing any risk of danger to the other children in the home. Read that timing carefully. The household measured a teenager as a possible threat to kids and acted on it, once the one who allegedly warned everyone was already gone.Hudson, sixteen, was indicted as an adult in Anna's death and pleaded not guilty. He's presumed innocent, and a September trial will decide his case. What the trial can't decide is the question this True Crime Today episode puts on the table: what do we owe the adults who were allegedly told, in detail, and chose comfort over action?The newest court filings sharpen it. Federal prosecutors have delivered Anna's complete Snapchat extraction, FBI investigative reports, and grand jury materials to the defense, sealed under a protective order, meaning the last words this eighteen-year-old ever typed are working evidence in her accused killer's file. Meanwhile the custody fight between Hudson's parents has spilled texts into the record, including a 32-hour delay before his father even learned Anna was dead.Stack the alleged pre-cruise warnings against the government's claim that this happened without any warning, add a judge's detention order invoking psychopathy, and one conclusion becomes hard to escape. Somebody could see it. The episode makes the case that pretending otherwise should start carrying a price, and Anna Kepner's story is where that argument begins.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #TrueCrimeToday #CarnivalCruise #CruiseShip #JusticeForAnna #TrueCrimeCommunity #FBI #CrimeNews #DailyTrueCrime

Federal agencies publish every contract they award, and that spending data reveals which offices buy your service and how much they paid last year, including one region where the Army alone obligated $27 million. ack Golden walks through pulling agency spending into a pivot table to find the offices actively buying, the recipients already winning, and the NAICS codes that point a small vendor toward contracts with little competition. What you'll learn in this episode: - How to turn raw federal spending data into a ranked list of which offices actually buy your service - The reverse-engineering move that starts from what you do and finds the agencies that fund it - How to read number of actions to tell a one-off contract from an office that buys repeatedly - How to surface the companies already winning in your area as competitors or teaming partners - Why more than 70 separate places hide federal opportunities, and how to stop hunting across all of them Chapters: 0:00 - Federal opportunities buried across 70+ places 0:48 - Picking an agency, NAICS code, and industry to search 1:40 - Army region with $27 million in unbid work 2:00 - Building the pivot table from raw contract data 2:38 - Ranking offices by total dollars obligated 4:05 - Following the money to the top NAICS codes 5:52 - Reading number of actions to spot repeat buyers 7:00 - Finding recipients already winning in your area 7:47 - California construction spending by agency and office Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Read more from VPM News:  Voters will decide reproductive rights' future four years after Roe  WATCH: Amending Virginia    Other links:  Federal judge rules in favor of Shenandoah students over Confederate school names (WMRA)  Oak Grove hands out 350 book bags to Richmond families 'to put people first' (WTVR)  Janet Howell, trailblazing Virginia state senator, dies at 82 (The Washington Post)*  SCC chair recused herself from earlier NextEra case (Richmond Times-Dispatch)*  Governor seeks participants for new corrections council to help shape Va. prison reforms (Virginia Mercury)  Virginia communities race to get 1% sales tax for school construction on the ballot (Cardinal News)  *This outlet uses a paywall.  Our award-winning work is made possible with your donations. Visit vpm.org/donate to support local journalism. 

It's been one year since President Donald Trump launched what he called a federal takeover of D.C., sending National Guard troops into the city and dramatically expanding the federal law enforcement presence on our streets. His stated goal was to make D.C. safer -- looking at the crime stats, it hasn't necessarily worked out that way. But it has had a huge impact on the lives of D.C. residents.Bloomberg Law reporter Keith Alexander has been reporting on the lives of those caught up in the federal crackdown. He's here to explain what happened to them, what the National Guard is doing in D.C. a year later, and what this past year tells us about the future of the federal presence in the city. Want some more DC news? Then make sure to sign up for our morning newsletter City Cast DC. You can text us or leave a voicemail at: ‪(202) 642-2654‬. You can also become a member, with ad-free listening, for as little as $10 a month. Learn more about the sponsors of this August 11th episode: DC Sustainable Energy Utility DC Department of Behavioral Health Library of Congress Interested in advertising with City Cast? Find more info HERE.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jackson County government has developed a reputation for pervasive corruption. The most recent blow was the federal indictment of Interim Jackson County Executive Phil LeVota, who is accused of trying to bribe a rival candidate.

Everyone has read about how much productivity AI can have for federal applications. That allure can lead you into a situation where you may not be as prudent as you should be. Today, we sat down with Jamie Holcomb, COO of Electrosoft, and Steve Riley, VP and Field CTO of Netskope, to better understand how to balance the promise of AIAI with practical application in the federal government. Steve Riley has looked at federal technology projects, and he thinks that the government must get out of their pilots and into operations, measuring results and impact that is meaningful to the taxpayer. They highlight the rapid advancements in AI, noting that government agencies struggle to keep pace with commercial innovation. Riley thinks agents are great for gathering, assimilating, and assessing information.  It is probably not time for them to have independent agency. A survey reveals that 78% of federal leaders believe AI tools should be managed like users or devices within zero trust frameworks. Only 31% of federal IT leaders have high visibility into public AI tools. Because of Jamie Holcomb's experience at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, he thinks success comes down to action, not architecture.  From his view, agencies need timely intelligence connected directly to operational decisions. The conversation emphasizes the need for federal agencies to balance innovation with security, particularly in predictive AI and zero trust strategies, and to prioritize AI discovery and integration.  

Washington lawmakers approved nearly $20 million to help lawfully present noncitizens retain long-term care coverage, expecting to reach about 1,200 people. Federal rule changes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mean only 173 will be covered. Around 1,500 noncitizens receiving long-term care services in Washington lose Medicaid on Oct. 1. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/20m-in-long-term-care-money-for-wa-immigrants-to-cover-fewer-than-200-people/ #WashingtonState #Medicaid #LongTermCare #Immigrants #Healthcare #SEIU775 #FederalPolicy #WashingtonStateStandard

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On a federal prime-sub relationship, a scope review is a short document a prime walks through line by line so a subcontractor commits to payment terms, performance, and deliverables before work starts.  David Rambhajan, a service-disabled veteran-owned construction contractor who built and sold his firm after 15 years, explains how that one habit prevents the price increases and missed expectations that sink most subcontractor relationships, and how small firms can partner on federal work without triggering affiliation. What you'll learn in this episode: - The three ways to partner on a federal contract and when to use each - Why a signed contract is not enough, and what a scope review adds before work begins - What the affiliation rules actually check when your subcontractor is a large business - How like-kind subcontracting lets a small firm meet self-performance requirements - How a service-disabled veteran-owned electrical sub helped deliver a $12M VA clinic Chapters: 0:00 - Three ways to partner on a federal contract 2:00 - Prime sub relationships and why clarity wins 4:00 - Scope reviews and stopping price creep 6:00 - Affiliation rules and the large business risk 8:00 - Self-performance requirements in construction 10:00 - Like-kind subcontracting with veteran-owned firms 12:00 - Inside a $12M VA design build in Minneapolis Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

Convidadas: Beatriz Rey, cientista política, pesquisadora na Universidade de Lisboa e coordenadora do estudo 'O fortalecimento do Legislativo no Brasil', da Fundação FHC; e Synthya Maia, pesquisadora do Legisla Brasil. A Constituição Federal, aprovada em 1988, indica logo em seu segundo artigo: "São Poderes da União, independentes e harmônicos entre si, o Legislativo, o Executivo e o Judiciário". O pacto firmado pela sociedade brasileira no período da redemocratização deu à figura do presidente a centralidade do poder político. Acontece que nas últimas quatro décadas, muita coisa mudou: entre alterações regimentais, impeachments de presidentes e crescente ingerência sobre o destino do Orçamento público, o Congresso aumentou a força gravitacional de seu poder – e vem, historicamente, reduzindo sua taxa de renovação. Neste episódio, Victor Boyadjian entrevista duas pesquisadoras. Primeiro, ele fala com Beatriz Rey sobre o contínuo processo de hipertrofia de poder do Parlamento – e sobre quais foram os instrumentos usados para isso nas últimas décadas. Depois, ele conversa com Synthya Maia sobre o funil para a renovação dos quadros no Congresso.

Fertilizer runoff is one reason nutrient pollution went up in U.S. waterways. Federal money will help expand flood monitoring in Iowa. And the Iowa Libertarian Party will nominate two new candidates this week to replace the ones who were kicked off the General Election ballot.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the earliest federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the scope appeared strikingly narrow compared with the breadth of the conduct surrounding him. Investigators had evidence pointing beyond Epstein himself: recruiters who helped bring young women and girls into his orbit, employees who facilitated access to his properties, financial institutions that processed enormous sums of money, pilots who transported Epstein and his associates, and a network of powerful people who repeatedly appeared around him. Yet the federal response repeatedly centered on Epstein as an individual offender rather than treating the operation surrounding him as a potentially sprawling criminal enterprise. The extraordinarily broad non-prosecution agreement reached in Florida reinforced that approach by extending protection to unnamed potential co-conspirators instead of using those individuals as investigative pressure points. When Epstein was arrested again in 2019, prosecutors charged him with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking, but his death brought the criminal case against him to an abrupt end. Ghislaine Maxwell was later prosecuted and convicted, but the broader question remained: why had a network that operated across multiple jurisdictions for years produced so few federal prosecutions? Taken together, the history created the appearance of an investigation designed to establish responsibility for specific defendants rather than systematically identify every facilitator, recruiter, financial enabler, participant, and potential co-conspirator connected to Epstein's operation.The DOJ also had an extensive collection of investigative and prosecutorial tools available that could have supported a much broader inquiry. Federal authorities could pursue conspiracy charges, money-laundering statutes, financial-record subpoenas, grand-jury testimony, immunity agreements, cooperation deals, immigration and visa investigations, tax inquiries, asset-forfeiture proceedings, obstruction cases, and, where the evidence satisfied the statutory requirements, potentially racketeering theories aimed at an ongoing enterprise rather than isolated crimes. Following Epstein's money alone could have provided investigators with a roadmap through banks, corporations, trusts, shell entities, property transactions, payments to associates, and transfers involving victims or recruiters. Aggressively flipping lower-level participants could likewise have helped prosecutors work upward through the organization instead of stopping with its most recognizable figures. None of that automatically would have produced charges against every person associated with Epstein, because association itself was not evidence of criminal conduct, but the striking issue was how rarely the government's enormous investigative arsenal appeared to be deployed publicly toward dismantling the entire ecosystem that allowed Epstein's abuse to continue. The enduring criticism, therefore, was not simply that prosecutors failed to charge more people; it was that the government never demonstrated the kind of relentless, enterprise-wide investigation routinely employed against organized crime, trafficking organizations, fraud rings, and other complex criminal networks.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This week on the Queer News podcast, fIn politics, trans troops continue fighting for their right to serve in the military and Iowa teachers receive a settlement after being suspended for a drag show. In sports, Cleveland announces a new WNBA team and transphobes have entered the WNBA chat. And last but not least, In culture and entertainment, the thrive fund has opened grant applications for gender-affirming care and you might meet the criteria. Let's get into it! Want to support this podcast?

A poop-themed dog toy took on one of America's most iconic whiskey brands and after 12 years in federal court, it helped reshape trademark law. In this episode of The Valley Current®, Jack Russo unpacks the extraordinary legal battle between Jack Daniel's and VIP Products, tracing the case from the trial court to the Supreme Court and back to the Ninth Circuit. Along the way, he explains how parody, source identifiers, and brand dilution collided in a dispute that became far bigger than a squeaky toy. More importantly, Jack explores what the case reveals about the true cost of intellectual property litigation, where persistence can be as valuable as legal strategy, and why the party that changes the law is often the one that simply refuses to quit. Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"®️  

This week host John Kruse delves into outdoors news, the Rocky Mtn Elk Fdtn's take on a new Federal grizzly bear managment rule, a huge 8.5 pound kokanee salmon caught out of Wallowa Lake in Northeast Washington, and the relationship between oil drilling and funding our public lands. www.americaoutdoorsradio.com 

Quake discusses Lil Durk getting hit with fourth superseding indictment ahead of Federal murder-for-hire trial, Diddy's prison release date being pushed back, his Ibiza tapes facing final forfeiture and his seized cash & electronics officially forfeited to the government, Keefe D denying request to post bail and saying  he won't take plea deal, Cam'ron threatening to expose Cardi B's team, Kurupt saying Eminem covered his rehab costs, Chris Brown wanting a new trial after losing dog attack case, Drake VS YG, the plot to murder Drakeo Tha Ruler, The Game's issues with Kendrick Lamar surfacing, 50 Cent clowning Rick Ross for poor sales, Ross responding and much more.(00:00) - Intro(03:22) - Lil Durk Hit With Fourth Superseding Indictment Ahead Of Federal Murder-For-Hire Trial(07:38) - Diddy's Prison Release Date Pushed Back(10:26) - Diddy's Ibiza Tapes Face Final Forfeiture As Feds Reveal Few Details About Recordings(11:59) - Diddy's Seized Cash & Electronics Officially Forfeited To The Government(13:30) - Keefe D Denied Request To Post Bail, Claims He Knows Who Killed Tupac(14:52) - Keefe D Says He Won't Take Plea Deal In Tupac Murder Trial, Suge Knight Listed As A Witness(19:20) - Cam'ron Threatens To Expose Cardi B's Team(23:08) - Kurupt Says Eminem Covered His Rehab Costs(25:22) - Chris Brown Wants A New Trial After Losing Dog Attack Case(26:47) - Drake VS YG, The Plot To Murder Drakeo Tha Ruler(35:17) - The Game's Issues With Kendrick Lamar Surface(39:57) - 50 Cent Clowns Rick Ross For Poor Sales, Ross Responds(59:16) - New Music(59:43) - Album Sales(01:00:50) - Billboard Hot 100

Reclaiming Medicine: The Ancient Practices That Offer Holistic Healing Has modern science erased a world of holistic healing? Our expert this week argues that true health must reunite scientific advancements with ancient teachings, including community, nature, and cultural traditions. She explores the root causes of why traditional wisdom was pushed to the margins of science, and how we can reclaim these historical practices. Guest: Dr. Geeta Maker-Clark, director of integrative nutrition & advocacy, Endeavor Health, co-director of the culinary medicine program, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, author, Medicine for All People Host and Producer: Kristen Farrah   Who Pays For Innovation? The Fragile State Of Federal Research Funding Universities serve as the vital engines driving groundbreaking scientific discovery. Our experts explore the cutthroat world of securing research grants and explain why the future of global innovation hinges on highly competitive federal funding. Guests:  Sally Kornbluth, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Darren Lipomi, professor & chair of the department of chemical & sustainability engineering, University of Rochester, author, Science Nonfiction Host: Greg Johnson Producer: Kristen Farrah Facebook: ingoodhealthpodX: @ ingoodhealthpodIG: @ingoodhealthpodYouTube: @ingoodhealthpodSpotify Apple Podcast In Good Health PodcastSubscribed to the newsletterFull ArchiveContact UsBecome an Affiliate Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Losing 15,000 experienced federal personnel leaves America vulnerable when seconds count, and key agencies built to safeguard the nation—including FEMA, the FBI, and the DOJ—are being systematically hollowed out under current Republican leadership. Michael Steele discusses the quiet dismantling of America's emergency infrastructure. This isn't just about party politics; it's a critical look at how weakened response systems put everyday citizens, families, and communities in direct jeopardy.Catch Michael Steele on The Weeknight Mondays - Fridays at 7pm EST on MSNBC: https://www.msnbc.com/weeknightFollow Michael on X: https://x.com/MichaelSteeleFollow Michael on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/michaelsteele.bsky.socialFollow Michael on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chairman_steele/Follow Michael on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@chairman_steeleListen to The Michael Steele Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-michael-steele-podcast/id1412905534Watch The Michael Steele Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJNKzTkCZE9uNqPiKYw5eU5YkS_mMsr6oIf you enjoyed this, be sure to share it with a friend!

Other Transaction Agreements, known as OTAs, are a federal contract vehicle that carries almost none of the standard bidding rules, and agencies now issue them at every project size rather than only for large awards. Eric Coffie breaks down how a small firm can pitch a contracting officer on using an OTA, why the same vehicle powers major technology awards like Palantir's, and how the vehicle fits alongside 8(a), WOSB, and IDIQ. What you'll learn in this episode: - What an OTA is and why it operates with far fewer rules than a standard solicitation - Why OTAs now fund contracts of all sizes, not just billion-dollar programs - How to pitch a contracting officer on the buying vehicle that gets them the least pushback from leadership - Where OTAs sit alongside 8(a), WOSB, and IDIQ as options to put in front of an agency - Why safety and Corps of Engineers standards like EM385 can keep a federal contractor on a project when others get removed Chapters: 0:00 - Finding the contract before you bid on it 1:10 - Making a requirement mandatory to bid 2:40 - OTAs fund projects of every size 3:54 - How Palantir wins work through OTAs 4:40 - Pitching the government on which vehicle to use 7:05 - OTAs for construction and the bonding question 7:24 - The $20 million safety company story 9:38 - Why the bond is really insurance Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

Derrick Mein just got back from Europe. World Cup in Italy. World Championships in Portugal. Third in the world out of nine hundred competitors. One target behind the new world champion. Chad sits down with the four-time world champion and two-time Olympian and asks the question every hunter has wondered about themselves — are you actually a good shotgunner? Derrick breaks it all down. Stance, eye dominance, sight picture, muzzle movement, follow through. Why you stop your gun and miss. Why both eyes open isn't always the right answer. Why the mental game catches up with everyone, even the best in the world. They also get into ESP Hearing Protection, Federal ammunition at competition level, what it costs to compete when most of those nine hundred shooters in Portugal paid their own way, and the 156-inch archery eight pointer hanging on the wall behind him. This episode is presented by Federal Premium Ammunition and brought to you by Benelli Shotguns, HiViz Sights, Rob Roberts Custom Gunworks, ESP Hearing Protection, Avery Outdoors, Realtree Camo, Jack Link's Protein Snacks, CamoSpace, Oakley Sunglasses, and Featherlite.

Ghislaine Maxwell had long been branded a serial liar by Epstein survivors because her public denials repeatedly collided with sworn testimony, documentary evidence and the accounts of women who said she had helped recruit, groom and abuse them. Survivors and their attorneys argued that Maxwell did not merely minimize her conduct but systematically rewrote the history of Epstein's operation, portraying herself as an innocent employee or former girlfriend who knew nothing about the exploitation occurring around her. Her credibility deteriorated further whenever she attacked the truthfulness of survivors while refusing to accept responsibility for her own role. To those who endured the abuse, Maxwell's changing stories were not incidental inconsistencies; they were part of the same strategy of deception and intimidation that had protected Epstein's network for years.That reputation was reinforced by her sworn testimony in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. Federal prosecutors later charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury, alleging that she had lied during separate depositions in April and July 2016 about matters including Epstein's sexualized massages, the presence of underage girls and her own knowledge of his conduct. Those perjury counts were ultimately separated from the sex-trafficking trial and later dismissed after her conviction, so she was not convicted of perjury. Nevertheless, the criminal charges showed that prosecutors believed her false statements under oath were deliberate and material, while her conviction on five trafficking-related counts demonstrated that the jury rejected the broader innocent-bystander narrative she had maintained. For survivors, the depositions became powerful evidence that Maxwell had continued lying even under oath when the truth threatened her freedom and reputation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Who Pays For Innovation? The Fragile State Of Federal Research Funding Universities serve as the vital engines driving groundbreaking scientific discovery. Our experts explore the cutthroat world of securing research grants and explain why the future of global innovation hinges on highly competitive federal funding. Guests:  Sally Kornbluth, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Darren Lipomi, professor & chair of the department of chemical & sustainability engineering, University of Rochester, author, Science Nonfiction Host: Greg Johnson Producer: Kristen Farrah Facebook: ingoodhealthpodX: @ ingoodhealthpodIG: @ingoodhealthpodYouTube: @ingoodhealthpodSpotify Apple Podcast In Good Health PodcastSubscribed to the newsletterFull ArchiveContact UsBecome an Affiliate Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Over the past week, a growing number of municipalities across the United States have reported that their water systems were hacked. The Times has found that the attacks were most likely perpetrated by Iran. Today, Dustin Volz, a cybersecurity and intelligence correspondent for The New York Times, explains how the hacking exposes yearslong failed efforts to shore up vulnerabilities in U.S. infrastructure, and how Iran may be seeking a new kind of leverage that could extend the war's reach to within U.S. borders and affect something as elemental as the water we drink. Guest: Dustin Volz, a cybersecurity and intelligence correspondent for The New York Times. Background reading:  Federal and state officials are racing to address an assault on the nation's water supply. Cyberattacks on water systems nationwide that affected Michigan and Minnesota also included at least five more states. Evidence points to Iranian involvement. Photo: Jenn Ackerman for The New York Times For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.  Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Federal contract opportunities are scattered across SAM.gov, agency forecasts, expiring contracts, and more than 70 other places, and the contact who decides an award is often findable before the solicitation ever posts. Randie Ward, a business development specialist, walks through how to identify the right program manager or small business specialist, pull contacts from industry day PDFs and free tools, and start the relationship before the RFP goes live. What you'll learn in this episode: The 70-plus places federal opportunities hide, and why SAM.gov alone leaves wins on the table Why industry day PDFs are contact gold mines and how to work through them Who to approach first inside an agency, and why the small business specialist opens the door How to find a hidden program manager's email using free ZoomInfo Light in under 15 minutes How to read an agency budget to learn what work is funded before it is advertised Chapters: 0:00 - Industry day PDFs as agency contact gold mines 0:52 - Small business specialist as your first agency contact 1:25 - Contracting officers, program managers, and who protects whom 2:51 - LinkedIn outreach that lands meetings with directors 3:42 - Free ZoomInfo Light to find a hidden decision maker 5:11 - Reading agency budgets to find funded work early 6:12 - Why program managers are harder to find than officers 7:33 - Capabilities briefings and reasons to keep reaching out Mindy gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them. Sign up for free Daily Alerts and get opportunities delivered to your inbox before the day starts.

Senate is on track to confirm Todd Blanche as Attorney General, after the final two undecided Republicans announced how they will vote: Lisa Murkowski (AK) is a 'no', but Bill Cassidy (LA) is a 'yes', meaning Blanche has just enough support to make it; Senate passes the 'Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia & Iran Act' with an overwhelming bipartisan vote. It gives the U.S. President power to sanction countries that import Russian oil and gas, aiming to cut off the Russia's money supply to continue its war against Ukraine; Labor Department says the U.S. economy lost 23,000 jobs in July… not what forecasters had expected; Federal appeals court panel rules construction of President Trump's White House ballroom must stop because it requires Congressional approval. President says he will appeal to the Supreme Court, calling the project necessary for presidential security and the court's decision was "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful"; What is next for the Farm Bill now that the Senate Agriculture Committee has voted it down over party disagreements about food aid funding? We will talk with Grace Yarrow, Food & Agriculture Reporter for Politico (36); House Speaker Mike Johnson predicts his Republican party will buck the historical trend of the President's party losing House seats in the midterm elections.. and he will remain Speaker after November. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Special education enrollment in the United States has reached record highs, but what's really driving the increase? Is it better diagnosis, changing academic expectations, broader legal protections, or something else entirely?(NOTE: If you don't want to hear about Jen's wild concert adventure and why her voice sounds like a 70-year-old smoker, bypass our banter and skip to the 6:50 time stamp)In Episode 2 of our special education series, we move beyond the history of IDEA and examine what's happening inside today's schools. We break down the latest enrollment trends and ask whether the education system has changed more than the students themselves.Although billions of dollars are spent every year supporting students with disabilities, reliable nationwide cost data is decades old, federal funding continues to fall short of original promises, and local school districts are increasingly forced to make up the difference.Whether you're a parent, educator, policymaker, or simply curious about the future of public education, this episode provides the numbers—and the context—to understand one of the fastest-growing challenges facing American schools.What it means that more than 8.2 million students now receive special education services.The 13 disability categories recognized under federal law and how students qualify for services.Why boys are identified for special education at much higher rates than girls.Competing theories behind rising special education enrollment.Why many Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) rely on common accommodations like extended time—and whether those supports are enough.The surprising lack of modern nationwide data on special education spending.How the federal government has consistently funded far less than the level originally envisioned under IDEA.Why educating students with disabilities costs substantially more than general education—and what those rising costs mean for school districts.Special education enrollment continues to rise nationwide, now serving approximately 15% of all public school students.Autism diagnoses represent one of the fastest-growing disability classifications in American schools.Federal funding has never fully matched the commitment originally envisioned when IDEA became law, leaving states and local districts responsible for much of the financial burden.Understanding special education requires looking beyond statistics to the legal, educational, and financial systems that shape the delivery of services."The numbers keep climbing—but the funding promised to support those students never truly caught up."RESOURCES USED IN THIS EPISODE:Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA)U.S. Department of Education special education data The Advocacy Institute California special education funding reports Special Education Stats [2023 Update]What federal education data shows about students with disabilities in the U.SPublic School Teacher Salary in California.COE - Students With Disabilities3 Reasons Why More Students Are in Special EducationWho Qualifies for an IEP in California?Dumping Kids with IEPs into General Education Classrooms is not Inclusion | by Laura J. Murphy, MFA, MEd | Age of Awareness | MediumCalifornia annually spending over $13 billion on special education California's $2.4 billion special education boost addresses critical needs, but challenges remain | EdSource  2026-27Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Funding Gaps by School District | NEA.Follow the podcast so you never miss an episode in this series exploring the history, policy, funding, and real-world impact of special education in America.If this episode helped you better understand today's education system, please leave a 5-star review, share it with a friend or colleague, and join the conversation on social media. Your support helps more educators, parents, and community members discover the podcast.

Federal changes to HeadStart under President Donald Trump could make the early education program less effective.  Democratic candidate for governor Francesca Hong is facing a controversy over her stance on Thanksgiving. And, hear how data centers and other economic issues are playing out in the primary races for governor.

A Stillwater high school student who pleaded no contest to raping and strangling two of his ex-girlfriends finished his youthful offender probation this week without a single day in prison, and a newly sworn district attorney is now asking the federal government to take the case Oklahoma no longer can.SOURCES, LINKS, AND PRINT VERSION: https://weirddarkness.com/jessebutler20260805Look for this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio, Amazon Music, Pandora, TuneIn Radio, and other podcast apps. Get a list of free listening apps here: https://pod.link/1078714736*No AI Voices Are Used In The Narration Of This Podcast*WeirdDarkness® is a registered trademark. Copyright ©2026, Weird Darkness.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.