Podcasts about Clause

────────────────────────────────────────[00:02:34]Federal Time Control Is Based on the Commerce Clause — the Same Justification Used for the Drug WarThey couldn't prohibit alcohol without a constitutional amendment but wave the commerce clause at everything else; the 10th Amendment was put there to close that loophole.────────────────────────────────────────[00:14:18]Gas Prices Back Above Four Dollars — White House Claims They'll Plummet Once Iran Is DegradedThey said the same thing months ago about Iran having no missiles left; Maria Bartiromo is still bewildered attacks keep happening after Trump declared victory.────────────────────────────────────────[00:19:29]CIA Director Woolsey Laughs on Fox About Rigging Foreign Elections — He Also Played the President in Dark WinterHe admits the CIA rigs elections "for a good cause"; he's the same man who played Trump's role in the pandemic rehearsal two decades before COVID.────────────────────────────────────────[00:43:44]CDC Paid Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More mRNA Shots — the Same Amount Trump Wants for His Entire AI Manhattan Project$600M per year; more goes to pediatric doses than adult; Knight: the same people targeting children with everything else have made kids the primary vaccine target.────────────────────────────────────────[00:57:30]Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Can Cause Uterine Cancer — Fluoroquinolones Can Cause Permanent Nerve DamageNeither pharmacists nor physicians warn patients; when Lance was damaged by fluoroquinolones, a doctor in their Bible study didn't even know it carried a black box label.────────────────────────────────────────[01:20:47]Pentagon Lied — US Military Casualties in the Iran War Have Risen to Nearly 100Three earlier attacks were never disclosed; Iran's mid-flight speed-changing missiles defeat trajectory-based defense systems; Iran blinded the billion-dollar radar array first.────────────────────────────────────────[01:25:26]Israel Approved a Settlement That Would Destroy 11,000 Predominantly Christian Homes Near BethlehemThe mayor says Christians get under 50 liters of water daily while settlers get over 400; 80% of their land has been taken; he needs permission to visit the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.────────────────────────────────────────[01:38:43]Barry Goldwater in the 1970s: "When Israel Gives a Command, Congress Jumps" — He Called for Cutting All AidOn a Buchanan firing-line segment, every participant agreed Israel was running America; Goldwater said cut the $3B if necessary.────────────────────────────────────────[01:51:37]Houthis Now Threatening a Maritime Embargo on Saudi Arabia — the Last Relief Valve for Global Oil MarketsSaudis redirected millions of barrels through a Red Sea pipeline to bypass Hormuz; blocking it would compound the disruption; two more tankers exploded this week.────────────────────────────────────────[01:57:45]Flock Camera Network Expanded Nationwide Through Secret NDAs With Town CouncilsErin Brockovich found tech companies placed city council members under non-disclosure agreements across the country; residents woke up to surveillance construction with no warning and no vote. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

────────────────────────────────────────[00:02:34]Federal Time Control Is Based on the Commerce Clause — the Same Justification Used for the Drug WarThey couldn't prohibit alcohol without a constitutional amendment but wave the commerce clause at everything else; the 10th Amendment was put there to close that loophole.────────────────────────────────────────[00:14:18]Gas Prices Back Above Four Dollars — White House Claims They'll Plummet Once Iran Is DegradedThey said the same thing months ago about Iran having no missiles left; Maria Bartiromo is still bewildered attacks keep happening after Trump declared victory.────────────────────────────────────────[00:19:29]CIA Director Woolsey Laughs on Fox About Rigging Foreign Elections — He Also Played the President in Dark WinterHe admits the CIA rigs elections "for a good cause"; he's the same man who played Trump's role in the pandemic rehearsal two decades before COVID.────────────────────────────────────────[00:43:44]CDC Paid Pfizer $1.2 Billion for More mRNA Shots — the Same Amount Trump Wants for His Entire AI Manhattan Project$600M per year; more goes to pediatric doses than adult; Knight: the same people targeting children with everything else have made kids the primary vaccine target.────────────────────────────────────────[00:57:30]Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Can Cause Uterine Cancer — Fluoroquinolones Can Cause Permanent Nerve DamageNeither pharmacists nor physicians warn patients; when Lance was damaged by fluoroquinolones, a doctor in their Bible study didn't even know it carried a black box label.────────────────────────────────────────[01:20:47]Pentagon Lied — US Military Casualties in the Iran War Have Risen to Nearly 100Three earlier attacks were never disclosed; Iran's mid-flight speed-changing missiles defeat trajectory-based defense systems; Iran blinded the billion-dollar radar array first.────────────────────────────────────────[01:25:26]Israel Approved a Settlement That Would Destroy 11,000 Predominantly Christian Homes Near BethlehemThe mayor says Christians get under 50 liters of water daily while settlers get over 400; 80% of their land has been taken; he needs permission to visit the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.────────────────────────────────────────[01:38:43]Barry Goldwater in the 1970s: "When Israel Gives a Command, Congress Jumps" — He Called for Cutting All AidOn a Buchanan firing-line segment, every participant agreed Israel was running America; Goldwater said cut the $3B if necessary.────────────────────────────────────────[01:51:37]Houthis Now Threatening a Maritime Embargo on Saudi Arabia — the Last Relief Valve for Global Oil MarketsSaudis redirected millions of barrels through a Red Sea pipeline to bypass Hormuz; blocking it would compound the disruption; two more tankers exploded this week.────────────────────────────────────────[01:57:45]Flock Camera Network Expanded Nationwide Through Secret NDAs With Town CouncilsErin Brockovich found tech companies placed city council members under non-disclosure agreements across the country; residents woke up to surveillance construction with no warning and no vote. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-david-knight-show--5282736/support.

Constitutional Deep Dives with Eric: Article 6-Section 1: The Debts and Engagements Clause! Conversations centered around the American Experiment and our Constitution and Bill of Rights! Our goal is to provide different perspectives - give historical context - model how to talk with those whom we may disagree with - tie foundational principals to today's headlines - PLUS, have some fun along the way. Please leave us a review and share with your friends! (A PODCAST PROVIDED AND OWNED BY DURING THE BREAK PODCASTS) Brought to you by Eric Buchanan and Associates: www.buchanandisability.com This podcast is hosted by ZenCast.fm

Transfer season is in full swing, England are out of the World Cup, and Chelsea's board is once again €20 million short of common sense. We get into all of it.Church is in session this week as we run through everything that's happened — and pointedly not happened — in Chelsea's transfer window. Trevoh Chalobah looks bound for Como, the Pep Chavarría saga has gone fully sideways, and we're now officially linked to Porto's Diogo Costa, which naturally means the board thinks he's worth €20m less than his release clause. We also debut a brand new segment: the Shitty Transfer Rumor of the Week. It goes about as well as you'd expect.Farewell, TrevChalobah has finally said yes to Como — except now Como might be getting cold feet, having never actually met our valuation. We're both sad to see him go: Chelsea through and through, a solid role player who did a lot for the club. Jason floats a theory that Como is waiting on England's third-place match to see if Trev finally gets minutes (and stays healthy) before dropping the cash. Also on the record: if Thomas Tuchel plays Reece James in that match, we are both going to lose it.The Left-Back Saga: Chavarría vs. CarrerasRayo Vallecano has gone from wanting €21m for Pep Chavarría to demanding his full €42 million release clause — for a 28-year-old with zero Spain caps whose market value sits around €10m. Meanwhile we've bid €25m for Real Madrid's Álvaro Carreras, a player Xabi Alonso has actually managed and might actually want. We go back and forth on which link is real, but land in the same place: if the prices are comparable, go get the guy your manager knows. And half of Chelsea Twitter screaming “back Xabi” over a Rayo left-back needs to log off.Diogo Costa and the €20 Million ProblemHere's the one that sends Daniel over the edge. Chelsea are linked to Porto keeper Diogo Costa — Portugal's starting goalkeeper at this World Cup — who has a €60m release clause. The board's position? He's worth more like 40. Just pay the extra €20 million and lock down the position for the next five to seven years. Get a shirt sponsor — you know, like every other club in the Premier League has — and you've found the money. Five sporting directors, and this is the M.O. every time: wildly overpay (Cucurella, Mudryk, Gittens, Delap, Fofana, Badiashile, Disasi) or nickel-and-dime a deal to death. There's no in-between.John Stones on a Free?Joe Cole and Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink both say Chelsea should sign John Stones on a free after City let him walk. Jason's initially in — then remembers Stones is 32 and, in Daniel's words, “can't jump anymore.” But with Chalobah leaving and our record buying defenders in their prime, we grudgingly agree: he started every England match at the World Cup while Fofana, Disasi and Badiashile sat at home. He can't make the back line worse. The fact that we're seriously weighing this — and might lose the bidding war to Leeds — tells you exactly where this club is right now.Shitty Transfer Rumor of the Week (New Segment!)Our new favorite thing. Jason brings a single-sourced Egyptian TV report that Mo Salah wants to come home to Chelsea. Daniel counters with PSG — the two-time defending Champions League winners — preparing a €65m bid for Nicolas Jackson. Both are complete nonsense. Both are exactly why this segment exists. We close with the Disasi-to-West-Ham rumor (£25m reported) and whether this board will ever move the players nobody wants. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit redwhitebluesfc.substack.com

They Said It kicks off with Rob Bradford asking Willson Contreras about his thoughts on the city of Boston and Willson Contreras expresses his feelings and says he won't waive his no-trade clause.

(00:00) Beetle, Zolak, and McKone talk about the midsummer reminder with the All-Star Game and how the players aren't amped up to play in the game. Is the MLB All-Star Game dead?(9:23) The guys talk about Willson Contreras wanting to finish his career in Boston and will not waive his no trade clause.(22:17) Fake Boston Survey Day begins. What is your favorite Boston sports team?(29:45) Fake Boston Survey: Favorite Boston ownership group?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

We talked about the Nick Pivetta contract clause, previewed the NFC fantasy football options, and a Mini 5.

Après plus d'un an de crise aiguë, le Mali et l'Algérie ont annoncé vendredi dernier le rétablissement de leurs liens diplomatiques. Une décrispation qui a surpris, alors qu'aucun signal ne l'avait laissé présager et que le Mali accusait avec virulence l'Algérie de « complicité » avec les « groupes terroristes » actifs à la frontière entre les deux pays : les jihadistes du Jnim, liés à al-Qaïda, et les indépendantistes du FLA. Quel rôle ont joué la Russie ou le Niger dans ce dégel ? La stratégie essentiellement militaire du Mali face aux groupes armés pourrait-elle évoluer avec l'implication d'Alger, qui prône le dialogue ? Ce rapprochement est-il crédible ou s'agit-il d'une énième péripétie diplomatique ? Michaël Béchir Ayari est analyste principal sur l'Algérie au sein de l'International Crisis Group (ICG), et auteur d'un rapport à paraître ce mercredi, intitulé Algérie-Mali : consolider la détente.   RFI : Après plus d'un an de rupture diplomatique, le Mali et l'Algérie ont annoncé le retour de leurs ambassadeurs et la réouverture de leurs espaces aériens mutuels. Un dégel que l'on n'avait pas vraiment vu venir. Beaucoup d'observateurs y voient la main de la Russie, qui aurait exigé de Bamako une position plus conciliante avec son voisin algérien. Est-ce que c'est le cas ?  Michaël Ayari : Il y a beaucoup de suppositions. D'après nos sources, il semblerait qu'il y ait déjà depuis un moment, même avant avril, c'est-à-dire les attaques coordonnées d'avril [menées conjointement par le Jnim et le FLA, NDLR], et surtout après avril, une médiation claire et nette du Niger.  Le Niger qui a lui-même renoué récemment avec l'Algérie.  Exactement, en début d'année. Donc ça partirait de là. Mais bon, il y a beaucoup de rumeurs, vous savez, il y a tellement d'acteurs investis au Mali... Les Russes, à mon avis, n'ont pas joué de rôle direct, même si évidemment il y a eu certainement des discussions entre Alger et Moscou, ça c'est clair.  Bamako a rompu l'accord de paix de 2015, qui avait été conclu entre l'État malien et les groupes armés indépendantistes du Nord, et qui avait été largement négocié à Alger. Les autorités maliennes de transition refusent tout dialogue avec les groupes armés, djihadistes ou indépendantistes, et n'envisagent qu'une réponse militaire. Cette position pourrait-elle évoluer à la faveur du dégel entre le Mali et l'Algérie ?  Forcément, il y a eu un deal quelque part. Il y a un contenu de ce deal. Forcément, le primat de la logique politique sur la logique militaire doit être une des clauses. À mon avis, c'est clair. Le retour à l'accord d'Alger, ça m'étonnerait beaucoup. Mais qu'il y ait une initiative politique, directement, pour une discussion, notamment avec le FLA... parce que l'État se délite. Et personne n'a intérêt à ce que le Mali tombe, y compris l'Algérie.  Donc vous pensez que, malgré leur discours guerrier, les militaires au pouvoir à Bamako depuis bientôt six ans pourraient faire un pas vers les rebelles indépendantistes du FLA ?  C'est peut-être un peu prématuré de dire ça. Vous savez, il y a plein de choses qui peuvent empêcher cela. Il faudra voir quelle forme ça prend. Si donc il y a eu un deal et qu'il est respecté, les prochaines étapes du deal, c'est : un retour de la coordination sécuritaire, un renforcement de l'échange de renseignements et une implication d'Alger, qui a quand même des contacts avec certains leaders du FLA, pour peut-être calmer les choses. Mais tout ça reste quand même conditionné. Beaucoup de choses peuvent arriver. Il peut y avoir des spoilers [des éléments perturbateurs, NDLR] au niveau international, il peut y avoir une opinion publique au Mali totalement opposée à ça, il peut y avoir aussi à l'intérieur du régime, ou du système, des forces qui refusent ça aussi... Donc on est à un moment où le choc frontal n'a pas l'air de marcher, et tout le monde essaie de mettre de l'eau dans son vin pour donner une chance à la paix, ce qui est très positif.  Vous envisagez une reprise de la coopération sécuritaire entre les deux États, mais il faut quand même rappeler que le pic de la crise avait été atteint en avril 2025, lorsque le Mali avait accusé l'Algérie d'avoir abattu un drone sur son territoire. L'Algérie assurait que le drone se trouvait dans le ciel algérien. L'affaire est donc soldée ? Ou enterrée ?  Il y a beaucoup de dossiers qui sont encore en suspens. Alors, ce qu'il y a d'intéressant, c'est qu'entre le Mali et l'Algérie, il n'y a pas de gros dossiers historiques. On est surtout sur du conjoncturel. Mais par contre, ce qui s'est passé ces quinze mois, les accusations qui ont été lancées de part et d'autre, il y aura des choses à clarifier, c'est sûr.  Justement, il est notoire que l'Algérie sert de refuge à des combattants et à des chefs du Jnim, liés à al-Qaïda, ou à des indépendantistes du FLA, depuis des années. Et ça exaspère les autorités maliennes de transition, qui ont accusé l'Algérie de « complicité » avec les « groupes terroristes ». Est-ce que quelque chose a changé ?  En fait, ça a toujours été pareil. Vous avez une Algérie qui, dès les années 1980, a essayé de se positionner entre les rebelles et les autorités maliennes. S'ils sont trop du côté des autorités maliennes, ils perdent toute influence auprès des rebelles. Et s'ils sont trop près des rebelles, ils perdent toute influence par rapport aux autorités maliennes et toute crédibilité. Donc ils essaient d'être entre les deux, parce qu'ils savent très bien que ce qui se passe au Mali concerne le sud de leur territoire et que tout mouvement indépendantiste ou séparatiste peut, à un moment donné, commencer à revendiquer une partie du sud de l'Algérie. Et donc de ce point de vue, ils veulent être au milieu. Ça veut dire que de temps en temps, on ferme les yeux sur certaines activités, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu'on soutient totalement les acteurs qui veulent en découdre avec le gouvernement malien ou alors qui veulent atteindre à l'unité du pays.  La présence en Algérie de l'imam Dicko, opposant malien en exil qui prône la chute des militaires au pouvoir, est-ce qu'elle pourrait être remise en cause ?  Il va devoir être plus discret, tout simplement. Si l'accord tient, évidemment, on n'entendra pas parler de l'imam Dicko. À mon avis, il n'y aura pas d'extradition, ça c'est sûr. Et si par contre l'accord ne tient pas, on entendra parler de lui, voilà !  La reconnaissance récente par le Mali du plan marocain pour le Sahara occidental : Alger n'en tient pas trop rigueur à Bamako, c'est sans conséquence ?  Ça a été très mal perçu, évidemment. Tout le monde s'est dit : « Voilà, c'est une concession faite au Maroc, peut-être que le Maroc a promis quelque chose », et on se rend compte que le Maroc n'a pas donné grand-chose. Donc ils ne vont pas revenir et reconnaître à nouveau la République arabe sahraouie démocratique, mais ils ne vont pas non plus avoir une voix très active sur le dossier sahraoui.  Ce dégel Mali-Algérie, en fin de compte, vous y croyez ou c'est une énième péripétie ?  Quand il y a des communiqués comme ça qui sortent, c'est qu'il y a quelque chose de profond qui a été réglé. Mais ça ne veut pas dire que ça va être linéaire. Il peut y avoir des rechutes et puis ça dépend du terrain aussi. Il peut y avoir un Jnim qui tout d'un coup devient incontrôlable, un Jnim qui gagne des batailles, il peut y avoir des tensions internes à droite et à gauche... Donc voilà, les choses maintenant sont à faire et il faut attendre les prochaines étapes. Et si le deal a été conclu, la première chose qu'on verra, c'est un accroissement et une amélioration de la coopération sécuritaire entre le Mali et l'Algérie.  À lire aussiAlgérie-Mali: comment expliquer le dégel diplomatique? Algérie-Mali : consolider la détente, à lire sur le site d'International Crisis Group

(0:00) The third hour begins with the guys discussing the relationship between Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum. (14:58) Thoughts on comments made by Bill Chisholm last week about the decision to trade Jaylen Brown. (24:27) The callers continue the conversation around the Celtics.(34:55) The guys react to breaking news that Willson Contreras will not waive his no-trade clause. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

(0:00) Matt McCarthy joins Mazz on The Baseball Hour and the guys open the show with their thoughts on Wilson Contreras saying he will not waive his no-trade clause. (15:12) Discussing Marcelo Mayer and his injury history. (22:22) Thoughts on the Red Sox recent hot streak and how they've gotten back into the A.L. wild card race. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Pippa Hudson speaks to Bradley Workman-Davies, Director at Werksmans Attorneys about restraint of trade as there have been several recent court judgments which have put it under the spotlight. Lunch with Pippa Hudson is CapeTalk’s mid-afternoon show. This 2-hour respite from hard news encourages the audience to take the time to explore, taste, read and reflect. The show - presented by former journalist, baker and water sports enthusiast Pippa Hudson - is unashamedly lifestyle driven. Popular features include a daily profile interview #OnTheCouch at 1:10pm. Consumer issues are in the spotlight every Wednesday while the team also unpacks all things related to health, wealth & the environment. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Lunch with Pippa Hudson Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays between 13:00 and 15:00 (SA Time) to Lunch with Pippa Hudson broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/MdSlWEs or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/fDJWe69 Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's the middle of summer, but we have plenty to talk about. What should we make of the NBA buyout clause in Tommy Lloyd's contract? Does Jaden Bradley rank among the best point guards in UA history? Is Arizona football really going to go 4-8 next season? And, oh yeah, that Kerr Kriisa thing.

Stanford's Fred Smith examines the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship decision, its historical roots in the Fourteenth Amendment, and the questions the Court leaves unresolved. --- The Fourteenth Amendment opens with a simple constitutional promise: that anyone born in the United States is a citizen. In a closely divided Supreme Court decision, that understanding of birthright citizenship is once again tested through competing readings of text, history, and precedent. In this episode of Stanford Legal, Professor Fred Smith, a leading scholar of the federal courts, joins Pam Karlan to examine the Court's ruling in Trump v. Barbara and the history behind the Citizenship Clause. The discussion traces the Clause to Dred Scott v. Sandford, which denied citizenship to Black Americans, and to the Reconstruction-era effort to overturn it, as well as United States v. Wong Kim Ark, long understood to affirm birthright citizenship for those born on U.S. soil. The discussion highlights deeper disagreements over how that history should shape constitutional meaning today. Smith and Karlan explore tensions between originalist approaches, reliance on precedent, and questions about congressional authority over citizenship. At stake is not only the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, but the broader question of who the Constitution recognizes as part of the American political community—and who gets to decide. Links: Fred Smith  >>> Stanford Law School Page Connect: Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X Stanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Spurs Chat: Discussing all Things Tottenham Hotspur: Hosted by Chris Cowlin: The Daily Tottenham/Spurs Podcast Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We're nearly halfway through the WNBA season and we're talking about it all! The New York Liberty humiliation season! The longest WNBA game in history! The Fogo de Chão clause in the new CBA agreement! #newyorkliberty #LasVegasAces #SeattleStorm #IndianaFever #ConnecticutSun #PhoenixMercury #DallasWings #ChicagoSky #MinnesotaLynx #WashingtonMystics #LosAngelesSparks #AtlantaDream #TorontoTempo #GoldenStateValkyries #UConnHuskies #Paigebueckers #azzifudd

Tama Potaka has been forced to do a complete u-turn and ditch a controversial clause in the Conservation Amendment bill that would have allowed the sale of some conservation land. Last week Forest and Bird released a series of maps that suggest up to 60 percent of the DOC estate could be sold or exchanged under the proposed law. Now the Conservation Minister has announced he is axing the clause, saying he hadn't been clear enough. Tama Potaka spoke to Lisa Owen.

On today's show, we offer a closer examination of nondisclosure agreements, the Freedom of Information Act and city governments. Plus, we explore new data that shows child well-being in Arkansas remains an issue. We also speak with the "Rebel With a Clause."

In this Federalist Society America 250 series, experts analyze modern legal and policy debates through the lens of the Founding generation. The Founders gave us the tools to answer many contemporary questions; join us as we explore those answers.Innovation is at the heart of the American economy, fueled by a patent system that represented a deliberate radical break from the British model. Under English practice, the Crown granted patents as royal favors, monopolies awarded at the sovereign's pleasure, with no requirement of genuine novelty or utility. The Framers rejected this. They believed that intellectual property rights should both reward ingenuity and advance society. By drawing Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 almost verbatim from the South Carolina Constitution, they tied the grant of patents to the mandate to "promote the progress of science and the useful arts."This system democratized invention, where anyone could apply for a patent, and set the stage for centuries of American innovative dominance. The U.S. model has largely been adopted globally.As we approach the Semiquincentennial, join our panel to explore the inventive spirit unleashed after the Founding. How did the Constitution break with British common law? Why did the Framers embed IP rights in the Constitution itself rather than the Bill of Rights? What does it mean that the provision passed without recorded controversy? And how healthy are those rights today?Featuring:Prof. Adam Mossoff, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason UniversityProf. David S. Olson, Associate Professor, Boston College Law SchoolProf. Zvi Rosen, Associate Professor, UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law(Moderator) Hon. John D. Love, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas

In this Federalist Society America 250 series, experts analyze modern legal and policy debates through the lens of the Founding generation. The Founders gave us the tools to answer many contemporary questions; join us as we explore those answers.Innovation is at the heart of the American economy, fueled by a patent system that represented a deliberate radical break from the British model. Under English practice, the Crown granted patents as royal favors, monopolies awarded at the sovereign's pleasure, with no requirement of genuine novelty or utility. The Framers rejected this. They believed that intellectual property rights should both reward ingenuity and advance society. By drawing Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 almost verbatim from the South Carolina Constitution, they tied the grant of patents to the mandate to "promote the progress of science and the useful arts."This system democratized invention, where anyone could apply for a patent, and set the stage for centuries of American innovative dominance. The U.S. model has largely been adopted globally.As we approach the Semiquincentennial, join our panel to explore the inventive spirit unleashed after the Founding. How did the Constitution break with British common law? Why did the Framers embed IP rights in the Constitution itself rather than the Bill of Rights? What does it mean that the provision passed without recorded controversy? And how healthy are those rights today?Featuring:Prof. Adam Mossoff, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason UniversityProf. David S. Olson, Associate Professor, Boston College Law SchoolProf. Zvi Rosen, Associate Professor, UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law(Moderator) Hon. John D. Love, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas

Nick Reiner trust payout — his trust reportedly had no clause to stop a distribution after a murder charge. Does your family's trust have one? Most don't.The probate petition filed in the Nick Reiner case exposes something that goes well beyond one family. The trust Rob and Michele Reiner established for their son in 1993 allegedly used the most common settings in estate planning — mandatory distributions at fixed ages, no behavioral conditions, no trustee discretion to withhold. Those default settings are the reason Nick Reiner's legal team can now argue that more than $1.5 million was his before anyone died, and that neither the trustee nor the slayer statute can take it back.According to reporting, the trustee is now preparing to ask a judge to release the funds. A hearing is reportedly on the calendar for August. High-profile defense attorney Alan Jackson has filed a declaration saying he stands ready to return to the case if the money comes through.This is not an episode about the Reiner case alone. It's about the document sitting in your filing cabinet right now. The trust your attorney drafted when your kids were small. The one you haven't opened since you signed it.Three provisions — an indictment freeze, a discretionary trust structure, and a behavioral trigger — are available to any family working with an estate attorney. They don't require predicting violence. They exist for the situations families actually deal with: addiction, instability, irresponsibility. The fact that they also protect against the unimaginable is the entire point.The Reiners reportedly had none of them. Most families don't. This episode walks through all three and explains exactly how each one would have changed the outcome in the Reiner case. Nick Reiner is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #MicheleReiner #TrustFund #EstatePlanning #SlayerStatute #FamilyTrust #NickReinerUpdate #TrueCrime

Washington Gun Law's William Kirk joins Cam to discuss a variety of topics, including today's hearing in Curtis v. Katz, where plaintiffs are raising a challenge to Virginia's gun and magazine ban based on the militia clause in the Virginia Constitution.

Pajak is here with today's news. An update on Mo Salah, Rayan's release clause and Inter Milan make their first offer for Curtis Jones. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Your weekly guide to the music biz and how it all works. This week, Stu and Joe go football crazy and stick a reducer early doors on this week's music biz news:→ 270. That's how many ‘unofficial anthems' called ‘World Cup 2026' have been uploaded to Deezer… and 70% of them are AI slop.→ YouTube reckons that its terms of service allow it to use independent musicians' uploads to train AI models. Is that really true?→ Tupac Shakur has been dead for 30 years – or HAS he, etc etc – but if you think that will stop him returning to his acting career for a new console game, you're wrong…→ Say You, Say Me… just don't Say It In My Voice Without Permission. Why has Lionel Richie been filing trademarks for some of his most famous sung phrases?→ UK indie streaming service Cantilever has raised £250,000 of funding from a group of independent labels. Can it carve out a niche for itself against giants like Spotify though?→ Ariana Grande is one of the ‘good eggs' of the pop world, and this week brought more evidence of that: her new charitable foundation, and beef with the White House…→ The Happy Mondays want to sell you a giant pill. But wait, it's not what it seems! This is the latest, very literal meeting of physical music and merchandise…And in the special post-show lock-in section just for our ⁠⁠Patreon Superfans⁠⁠, Stu and Joe prop themselves up at the bar – in this week's bonus material: Stu has used AI to make a stereotypical England-oriented World Cup song. But is it any good? (No.) We listen anyway.Joe and Stu dig into the weird and wonderful Official FIFA World Cup AlbumWhat other overly-literal packaging could be made? (Stu has ideas for 'Revolver' and Portishead's 'Dummy')Last week, Stu saw Rufus Wainwright and Joe saw Mike D – but which had the sparkliest shoes? And which one brought out a Pussycat Doll to do a duet?Joe explains why he only buys his gravy and chips on The Strand===================================As ever, we welcome your feedback, emails and – in particular – any questions you might have about how the music biz works!Email us: ⁠⁠thepriceofmusicpodcast@gmail.com⁠⁠See you next week!Stuart and Joe======TPOM online: http://tpom.uk/Support The Price of Music on Patreon:⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/ThePriceofMusic⁠⁠Follow Stuart on X - @stuartdredgeFollow The Price of Music on X - @PriceofMusicpodFor sponsorship opportunities, please email - ⁠⁠joe@musically.com

Voice Of GO(r)D is very happy to bring you an in depth discussion with Roleigh Martin, a lifelong data systems analyst and inventor, who has written an as yet unpublished book which will be of great interest to many of my listeners.”The Forgotten Half of The Patent Clause” advertises itself as a ‘constitutional law litigation strategy and a citizen's playbook' and Mr Martin joins the show to explain his thesis on how two words in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, ‘time limited', have been left out of the equation within the only monopoly the Constitution grants, patents for new products. With time limitations being abandoned in the understanding and execution of patent law, Roleigh explains that 58% of our economy are effectively protected from the free market competition that the founders had envisioned for America when they wrote the Constitution. Amongst that 58% includes the manufacture of cars, trucks, and other types of equipment, and a series of past judicial rulings has vaporized the market for remanufacture of patent expired equipment which should, constitutionally, pass into the public domain. This situation is, in part, why we see the prices of cars and trucks have become totally untethered from reality, and way out of the budgets for most people to purchase them, a problem that has created a drag on the economy and radically increased the cost of living for everyone. This problem with abandoning the time limitation on patents has combined with the wicked incursion of the regulatory state into every facet of life, and turned every new vehicle into an expensive surveillance liability that most people wouldn't purchase - if they had a choice.Roleigh goes through the history of a number of cases that brought us to this problem, and then a number of more recent cases, which, when combined with the 2024 Chevron Deference ruling, have created an opportunity to correct this unconstitutional incursion into our economy, and give competing manufacturers access to expired patents as originally envisioned in the Constitution.I sure would like to buy an inexpensive brand new version of a 1983 Ford F-150 or a 1999 Peterbilt rather than a wildly overpriced and larded down with unnecessary surveillance and automation tech 2026 model, wouldn't you?Roleigh's book shows us how we might re-orient industry towards making these offerings a legal reality, and you will enjoy this conversation greatly.You can find Roleigh on Twitter, and read this summary of his idea and his book -https://x.com/RoleighMartin/status/2042726307931287738You can also read over 30 Twitter Articles he has published explaining various aspects of his proposal -https://x.com/RoleighMartin/articlesHow I initially found Roleigh was through this article he wrote connecting truckers to his larger idea -https://x.com/RoleighMartin/status/2039522355702100013I've been honored to be asked to write a foreword to Roleigh's book, and as soon as he figures out a publisher and gets it out into the universe, the listeners of my podcast and readers of this Substack will be amongst the first to know.https://autonomoustruckers.substack.com/I am always open to questions and comments, and especially look forward to any you might have regards this episode and Mr Martin's ideas.Send them here - gordilocks@protonmail.comAnd if you enjoyed the show, tell a friend and send it to them! Word of mouth is the best advertising, and the only type I can afford.Roleigh quite liked my own book, End of The Road - Inside The War on Truckers and if you have yet to avail yourself of a copy, please visit my publishers website, where you can find options for a hardcover, e-reader, or audiobook narrated by me.https://creedandculture.com/books/end-of-the-road-inside-the-war-on-truckers/Thanks for listening!

Richard Epstein examines the 14th Amendment's opening clause, distinguishing the robust rights of citizens from the conditional privileges of aliens. He argues that naturalization was historically a federal prerogative, noting that early statutes, influenced by Thomas Jefferson, included explicit racial exclusions for persons of African or Asian descent.18751

Paul Hamilton joins WGR to discuss the possibility of the Buffalo Sabres acquiring Dylan Larkin this offseason. They evaluate Larkin's potential fit with Tage Thompson and the trade assets required to land a top-line center. Additionally, the conversation touches on the team's defensive core, the ongoing Stanley Cup Finals, and recent officiating controversies in the NHL playoffs. 01:42 - Yankees and Knicks update 03:20 - Dylan Larkin trade rumors 09:38 - Sabres trade currency 12:10 - Buffalo's defensive core 19:10 - Stanley Cup Finals analysis

Welcome back to Transfer Hub, your home of Aston Villa's transfer news, rumours, noise, murmerings, incoming and outgoings. On the show Luke is discussing the unraveling transfer saga of Morgan Rogers and reacting to Ben Jacobs comments on Morgan Rogers having a buy back clause to Manchester City. Im calling it out and wanting the respect on Aston Villa's name. #astonvilla #morganrogers #premierleague

Kevin Mack, the new president of Via Licensing Alliance, joins Eli for the Clause 8 season finale.Kevin talks about Via's plans to build its next patent pools around "de facto" standards — technology the market adopted on its own, with no standards body behind it — which would push collaborative licensing into territory it has never touched. Mack also takes a hard look at the royalty-free models spreading through tech and AI, from AV1 to the new Shared AI License Foundation (SAIL), argues that "free" rarely stays free, and explains why he's optimistic about where the patent system is heading.Kevin and Eli also discuss:*Via's model and the "tipping point" that turns a pool from a few licensors into thousands of licensees*"De facto" standards: pooling patents for technology no standards body ever blessed*Leadership turnover at Via, the HEVC pool's move to Access Advance, and a new strategy-and-growth group*The push into semiconductors, including a new DRAM memory program*AV1, SAIL, and why Mack thinks royalty-free rarely stays free*Whether AI patents are as "foundational" as advertised — and why "AI is not new"*Efficient infringement, patents as property rights, and why companies ultimately take a license*The mood out of Via's Rome summit and a US patent system tilting back toward ownersNotable names, companies & standardsPeople: Kevin Mack (president, Via Licensing Alliance); Heath Hoglund (former Via president); John Amster (Jamster Capital; RPX co-founder)Organizations: Via Licensing Alliance (Via LA), MPEG LA, Dolby, Access Advance, Alliance for Open Media, Shared AI License Foundation (SAIL), WIPO (PatentScope), DOJ, USPTOSAIL founders / board (public): Anthropic, Genentech, IBM, Meta, Microsoft; board observers eBay and TD Bank Group; members include Block and FigmaStandards & technologies: AAC, AVC (H.264), HEVC (H.265), AV1, MPEG-2, Qi wireless charging, DRAM memory, SEP / FRANDDisclaimer This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.voiceofip.com

In this Federalist Society America250 series, experts analyze modern legal and policy debates through the lens of the Founding generation. The Founders gave us the tools to answer many contemporary questions; join us as we explore those answers.In 2022, the Supreme Court overruled the "Lemon Test" for interpreting the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, holding that the Clause must instead be interpreted by reference to "historical practices and understandings." To do this, the Court suggested it would look to certain historical "hallmarks of religious establishments the framers sought to prohibit when they adopted the First Amendment." This has kicked off a vigorous debate, in both caselaw and scholarship, about what constituted "an establishment of religion" at the time of the Founding, and how that history should inform interpretation of the Establishment Clause today. Join a gathering of the foremost scholars and litigators of the Establishment Clause to discuss the Clause's historical meaning both as a matter of originalist theory and in its application to current church-state controversies, such as displays of the Ten Commandments in public schools.Featuring:Joe Davis, Senior Counsel, The Becket Fund for Religious LibertyDouglas Laycock, Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Virginia; Alice McKean Young Regents Chair in Law Emeritus, University of TexasMichael McConnell, Richard and Frances Mallery Professor of Law, Stanford Law School(Moderator) Hon. Ryan D. Nelson, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Some people want love to be a laugh a minute. Others want it to be malleable like a balloon. And others think love is a monster lying in wait in a sewer to devour them. And we're celebrating all of those today with Clowns! For this circus of an episode we read "Clause, Clown & Ferret" by Meghan Amy, and "Stop Me If You've Heard This One: A Novel" by Kristen Arnett. Our buffoonish hosts discuss self-sabotage, moms with kinks, and at one point they get so worked up that they had to pause recording for a second. Support us on Patreon! patreon.com/fmklitpod

EP — Adam Pope on why Manchester outperforms cities twice its size.Manchester's business culture is built on graft, confidence and doing things without waiting for permission. Adam Pope explains why the city's attitude consistently turns small firms into serious operators and why founders underestimate the Northern Powerhouse region at their cost.The conversation covers how Greater Manchester's geography, talent pool, transport links and industrial heritage shape commercial behaviour, plus the practical realities of scaling outside London. We also look at hiring, governance, legal blind spots and how AI is already changing professional services.What You'll Learn in This Episode:• Spot the cultural traits that drive Manchester's commercial confidence• Judge when to base operations inside or outside the city centre• Avoid common legal and governance gaps that derail SMEs• Use AI without weakening decision‑making or risk controls• Build trust in a region where people value straight dealingThis episode is for UK founders deciding where to build, scale or expand — especially if you're considering life outside the M25.*For Apple Podcast chapters, access them from the menu in the bottom right corner of your player*Spotify Video Chapters:0:00 Manchester isn't trying to be London01:34 Industrial heritage and tech investment04:02 Greater Manchester's expansion06:23 Culture, friendliness and swagger10:11 Wealth, influence and the city's vibe15:21 Starting and hiring in Manchester18:10 Northern Powerhouse and regional funding22:47 HS2, infrastructure and wasted budgets24:58 What high‑speed rail would really change32:18 Scaling across the North33:24 Trust, class and regional attitudes39:04 Legal sector differences48:35 AI, law and Adam's Clause platform57:13 Automation, headcount and future roles1:03:43 Where SMEs go wrong legally1:13:33 Business or BullshitWatch and subscribe to us on YouTubeFollow us:InstagramTikTokLinkedInTwitterFacebookIf you'd like to be on the show, get in contact - mail@businesswithoutbullshit.me

Bruce Lehman, head of USPTO from 1993 to 1998, joins Clause 8 for a wide-ranging conversation about the modern IP system, the internet boom, and why the AI era may require a new copyright response from Congress.Lehman helped shape internet-era copyright policy from the USPTO, including the work that led to the WIPO Copyright Treaties and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). He also played a major role in the broader 1990s pro-IP moment, when the United States was strengthening IP rights globally through TRIPS, WIPO, and trade policy.Now, Lehman argues that courts have spent the last two decades weakening copyright through an expansive view of fair use — creating a system where AI companies can train on massive amounts of human-created content without giving creators a meaningful stake. Asked whether new legislation is needed to protect creators in the AI age, Lehman does not hesitate: “The short answer is yes.”The episode also covers:*Lehman's “patent pendulum” theory and why he believes the US is now in a low-protection IP era*How the DMCA emerged from the Clinton administration's internet copyright work*TRIPS, WIPO, and the globalization of IP rights in the 1990s*Bayh-Dole and the rise of the university-to-startup pipeline*Lehman's historic confirmation as the first openly gay man confirmed by the Senate*His role in turning the USPTO into a “prominent perch” for national IP policy*Gilbert Hyatt, submarine patents, and SAWS*USPTO telework, examiner retention, and modernization*His message that current leadership should “stop tormenting the Patent Corps”*The limits of AI — and why Lehman thinks it lacks the "metaphysical" spark behind true invention*Judge Pauline Newman and her pro-patent legacyWatch the full episode and read the companion post on Voice of IP: https://voiceofip.com/Subscribe to the Clause 8 YouTube channel for bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/@clause8Disclaimer This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.voiceofip.com

Guest: Tess Lynch, Founding Attorney, Clause and AffectWhen Crimson Desert announced "no AI in our game," the internet applauded. But does anyone agree on what that actually means? Tess Lynch — gaming and IP attorney, founder of Clause and Affect, and one of the more practical legal voices covering this space — joined Greg to untangle what studios are really promising when they make that pledge, and what they're leaving dangerously undefined.What we get into:The three tiers of AI in games that almost nobody distinguishes clearly — procedural generation (been here forever, deterministic, mostly fine), machine learning trained on licensed data (DLSS, Adobe Firefly, getting complicated), and generative AI trained on scraped data (the one everyone's actually upset about, and for good reason).Why "no AI" policies get weird fast — no Gmail, no Copilot, no AI meeting notes — and why the real target is almost always generative AI replacing human creative work, not automation tools embedded in software you're already using.The consent problem hiding inside "licensed" datasets. Adobe Firefly is built on licensed images, but did those photographers consent to having their work used to train the model? Tess breaks down where that gets legally murky, and why the Scarlett Johansson standard she uses is a useful gut check.UGC platforms and the IP trap studios don't see coming. When players generate content in your game — especially with AI tools — the question of who owns it, who's liable for it, and whether you can even copyright it is almost entirely unsettled law right now.Why purely AI-generated work can't be copyrighted (current U.S. law requires human authorship), and what that means for studios shipping games with AI-generated assets as placeholders they forgot to swap out. Clair Obscure and Crimson Desert both came up.The patchwork regulatory problem. Every state has its own privacy laws, its own AI laws, its own age assurance rules. Tess calls it what it is: an amalgamation that will never get cleaner until it becomes a federal issue — which she doesn't expect soon.When should you actually talk to a lawyer? Her answer: yesterday. But more practically — before you touch sensitive data, before you go live with anything using AI in a novel way, and definitely before you sign contractor agreements that don't address it.And on the business side: what it's actually like to build a solo law firm serving indie devs and creatives who can't pay BigLaw rates. Billing, time management, and figuring out what your work is worth.Tess Lynch: LinkedIn | Clause and Affect website | Your AI NPC Might Be IllegalPlayer Driven: Discord | Newsletter

Ade Oladipo and Spencer Oliver are reporting live from the Dave Allen v Fillip Hrgovic weigh-ins as part of the Fight Night Daily Podcast and Allen's homecoming fight in Doncaster. Aswell as this fight, they also discuss Fabio Wardley activating the rematch clause for his fight with Daniel Dubois!Check out talkSPORT's Socials:

Sai Prakash joins to discuss his new book, The Presidential Pardon: The Short Clause with a Long, Troubled History. The Constitution's Pardon Clause grants the president a power unmatched in scope and consequence. In The Presidential Pardon, Prakash explores how this brief clause has grown into the most expansive and controversial tool of the modern presidency. Thomas Donnelly, lead scholar at the National Constitution Center, moderates. Additional Resources  Sai Prakash, The Presidential Pardon: The Short Clause with a Long, Troubled History National Constitution Center, Article II and the Pardon Clause National Constitution Center, The Nixon pardon in constitutional retrospect National Constitution Center, 10 famous people who received presidential pardons Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠podcast@constitutioncenter.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr Explore the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠America at 250 Civic Toolkit⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate Subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen Join us for an upcoming ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠live program⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or watch recordings on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Support our important work ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Donate

Tom Bartlett spent 22 years inside the NHS. For three and a half years, he led the 150-person engineering team at NHS England that built the £330M Federated Data Platform with Palantir.He a month ago and he's the only insider speaking publicly about what the platform actually does, what it costs, and whether the NHS has any credible alternative.We cover the architecture, the cost, the CLOUD Act, the BMJ exposé, the conflicts of interest at Chelsea & Westminster, and whether ministers should trigger the break clause.

Rex Heuermann's guilty plea resolved eight murder charges in one proceeding. But the structure of the deal itself raises questions that go beyond the confession. During a confidential session with prosecutors, Heuermann raised the name Karen Vergata — a woman he was never charged with killing. Her case was absorbed into the plea agreement, effectively closing it without a separate prosecution or public evidentiary hearing. The cooperation agreement with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit reportedly includes no mechanism to compel truthful participation or penalize refusal.This week's True Crime Today review revisits the most significant Gilgo Beach developments — the legal architecture of the plea, the evidentiary rulings that forced it, and the psychological dimensions revealed through documentary footage.Every defense motion had been denied. Whole genome sequencing — the forensic technique that matched Heuermann's DNA to evidence recovered from victim remains — was ruled admissible. The court ordered all charges tried in a single proceeding, eliminating any possibility of severance. Heuermann's defense had exhausted its options. The plea, framed by his attorney as a calculated pivot, followed a thousand days of maintained innocence.The Peacock documentary captured the private aftermath. Asa Ellerup, Heuermann's ex-wife, heard him describe the killings during a jailhouse visit — including confirmation of dismemberment conducted inside their shared residence. His daughter Victoria confronted him directly about whether the victims registered as human to him. He said they did not. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott analyzes the family dynamics under that level of sustained psychological exposure — the denial structures, the trauma responses, and what Heuermann's clinical detachment during these conversations reveals about how he processed decades of violence.The DA's office has acknowledged reviewing hundreds of cold cases across Suffolk County. Sentencing is pending. Whether this plea represents justice or an engineered exit remains the central unresolved question.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #GilgoBeachKiller #KarenVergata #SuffolkCounty #LISK #GuiltyPlea #SerialKiller #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

When Alice came down in 2014, much of the patent prosecution bar reacted with denial. Most practitioners hoped the USPTO, the Federal Circuit, or Congress would clean things up — and that adding some magic language to claims and specifications would eventually be enough.Eli Mazour and Ngai Zhang, separately, came to a different conclusion: there had to be a new, better way to obtain strong patents in the post-Alice world. They started comparing notes more than a decade ago, eventually converged on a shared approach, and now implement these strategies together at Foley & Lardner.On this episode of Clause 8, Eli and Ngai walk through what they actually do — their unique strategies for avoiding and overcoming Section 101 issues, why it's difficult for other attorneys to implement these strategies, and how they think their practice will be impacted in the age of AI.In this episode:* Why relying only on art unit prediction tools & wordsmithing is a losing strategy for § 101* Why claim 1 shouldn't be your broadest claim* How taking features out of independent claims helps advance prosecution - and how the strategy also leaves clients routinely surprised by how broad their issued claims end up* Examiner interviews as hostage negotiations: Ngai's framework based on Chris Voss's Never Split the Difference* Differing approaches that Ngai and Eli have on whether to push for an explicit on-the-record agreement before ending an interview* AI as a collaborator for patent drafting and prosecution* The importance of human interactions and communication for patent prosecution even in the age of AIWatch the full episode and read the companion post on Voice of IP: https://voiceofip.com/Subscribe to the Clause 8 YouTube channel for bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/@clause8

Send us Fan Mail

One business group alleges language in the proposed bill that would give the legislature power to change the threshold on the wealth tax ideaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Constitutional Deep Dive with Eric: Article 4 - Section 4 - The Guarantee Clause! www.buchanandisability.com or www.headlinesandopinions.com Conversations centered around the American Experiment and our Constitution and Bill of Rights! Our goal is to provide different perspectives - give historical context - model how to talk with those whom we may disagree with - tie foundational principals to today's headlines - PLUS, have some fun along the way. Please leave us a review and share with your friends! (A PODCAST PROVIDED AND OWNED BY DURING THE BREAK PODCASTS) Brought to you by Eric Buchanan and Associates: www.buchanandisability.com This podcast is hosted by ZenCast.fm

In today's conversation, you'll hear two friends talk through a super real (and super frustrating) situation: trying to cancel a gym membership and getting blocked at every step. You'll listen to natural, emotional English that native speakers use when they're venting and pushing back.You'll learn:clause: a specific rule or condition written into a contract“give someone the runaround”: to keep sending someone from person to person (or step to step) without actually solving the problemfluency tip: choose one line from the dialogue and say it three different ways, changing only your tone to practice sounding more naturalKeep listening, repeat out loud, and don't worry about being perfect—focus on sounding clear, confident, and natural one step at a time.

Date with a Debut is a podcast hosted by writer Nick Wasiliev: shining a light on debut authors, their incredible books, and their journeys to publication. In our second episode of series four, Nick sits down with Bridie Blake, the debut author of romance novel The Boyfriend Clause. WARNING: This podcast contains coarse language. Enjoy the show? Drop us a review, it really helps the show out! You can also subscribe to our new monthly newsletter: https://nickwasiliev.substack.com/ Check out our brand new podcast website: https://dwad.podpixels.com/ Check out the 2026 sponsor of the podcast, Pod Pixels: https://bit.ly/4cbG1Zt Subscribe on Podbean to never miss an episode: https://www.podbean.com/site/podcatcher/index/blog/3mRME5IMoSJx Date with a Debut is featured as part of the Australian literary platform Words & Nerds. Check out all shows on the platform here: https://danivee.com.au/podcasts/ BOOKS: Debut: The Boyfriend Clause / Bridie Blake: https://booktopia.kh4ffx.net/QYKVaz Additional books mentioned: The Butterfly Women / Madeleine Cleary: https://booktopia.kh4ffx.net/9VevmY What Did I Miss? / Holly Brunnbauer: https://booktopia.kh4ffx.net/Vx5MZj Looking For Alibrandi / Melina Marchetta: https://booktopia.kh4ffx.net/bay9Jb ADDITIONAL LINKS: Bridie's piece with the Australian Writers Centre: https://www.writerscentre.com.au/blog/bridie-blake-the-boyfriend-clause/ PRODUCTION NOTES: Host: Nick Wasiliev Guest: Bridie Blake Editing & Production: Nick Wasiliev Podcast Theme: ‘Chill' by Sakura Hz Production Code: 4.2 Episode Number: #60 Additional Credits: Dani Vee (Words & Nerds), Aideen Gallagher, Fruzsi Gal (Text Publishing) FOLLOW NICK WASILIEV (+ DATE WITH A DEBUT): A LITTLE IDEA PODCAST: Feed NEWSLETTER: nickwasiliev.substack.com WEBSITE: www.nicholaswasiliev.com YOUTUBE: @NickWasiliev_Official INSTAGRAM: @nickwasiliev TWITTER/X: @Nick_Wasiliev FACEBOOK: Nick Wasiliev TIKTOK: @nickwasiliev © 2026 Nick Wasiliev and Breathe Art Holdings ‘Date With A Debut' is a Words and Nerds and Breathe Art Podcasts co-production recorded and edited on Awabakal Country, and we pay our respects to all elders past and present.

President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick pride themselves on being dealmakers and on making the kind of unconventional deals for America no one else could have gotten done. Gil Hyatt is offering them one that sounds like a no-brainer. However, the question remains whether that dealmaking reputation is enough to overcome thirty years of inertia from prior administrations focused on opposing Hyatt, including most notably on keeping any more of his patents from ever issuing.Inventor Gil Hyatt returns to Clause 8 to discuss his proposal to donate foundational AI patents to the Pioneering AI Foundation, a nonprofit he says could help give the U.S. government new leverage to advance American interests. Hyatt also reflects on his decades-long battle with the USPTO, the motivation behind the foundation, and why he sees the project as a gift to America ahead of the nation's 250th birthday.Will America accept the gift?The episode covers:* 00:23 — the ongoing battle with the USPTO* 02:44 — the Pioneering AI Foundation* 05:35 — using the ITC and trade agreements as leverage* 07:11 — human rights and labor unions: leveling the global playing field* 10:24 — AI in the classroom: the “super headstart” for children* 12:35 — relieving drudgery: AI as a catalyst for creative thinking* 14:27 — addressing skepticism: motives and financials* 16:16 — repaying the dream: the legacy of immigrant parents* 17:34 — advice for the next generation of inventors* 18:22 — final thoughts: destiny and helping America

In this episode of JJ Meets World, JJ and Tucker finally tackle one of the most important topics of our time: pizza. From Chicago deep dish vs New York style to thin crust, Detroit-style, and stuffed crust, nothing is off limits. The conversation dives into the origins of pizza obsession (shoutout to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), the evolution of crust styles, and why pizza might be the ultimate "canvas food." Along the way, things take a surprising turn into the U.S. judicial system, including a real-life court opinion that uses pizza to explain federal law.

Chaque jour, en quelques minutes, un résumé de l'actualité culturelle. Rapide, facile, accessible.Notre compte InstagramDES LIENS POUR EN SAVOIR PLUSAUTEURS CLAUSE GRASSET: LeHuffpost, Marianne, RadioFrance, LibérationRETOUR WIL AIME : Wil Aime, Kultur AUTEURS TRIBUNE : Le Huffpost, Marianne LANA DEL REY JAMES BOND : RadioFrance, BBC FESTIVAL DU LIVRES : FranceInfo, Le Figaro DOC GYNECO : Le Figaro, Charts In FranceÉcriture : Mathys DebrilIncarnation : Mathys Debril Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Austin shares how you can increase your email response rate by 3X by giving the recipient a way out!Time Stamped Show Notes:[0:25] - Triple your response rate by using an “exit clause”[1:11] - Why typical sign-offs are a bad idea[2:27] - First impressions matter [2:52] - What to do instead - give them an out[5:05] - Try it for yourself and track the outcomesHave questions about how to use an exit clause? Text them to Austin at (201) 479-9511.Exit Clause Mentioned In Today's Episode:“Lastly, I know your time is valuable and I know this is a big ask coming from a stranger. If it's too much right now, that's totally fine! Feel free to say no. I'm grateful for whatever info you're able to share here or over the phone. Either way, have a fantastic week.”Want To Level Up Your Job Search?Click here to learn more about 1:1 career coaching to help you land your dream job without applying online.Check out Austin's courses and, as a thank you for listening to the show, use the code PODCAST to get 5% off any digital course:The Interview Preparation System - Austin's proven, all-in-one process for turning your next job interview into a job offer.Value Validation Project Starter Kit - Everything you need to create a job-winning VVP that will blow hiring managers away and set you apart from the competition.No Experience, No Problem - Austin's proven framework for building the skills and experience you need to break into a new industry (even if you have *zero* experience right now).Try Austin's Job Search ToolsResyBuild.io - Build a beautiful, job-winning resume in minutes.ResyMatch.io - Score your resume vs. your target job description and get feedback.ResyBullet.io - Learn how to write attention grabbing resume bullets.Mailscoop.io - Find anyone's professional email in seconds.Connect with Austin for daily job search content:Cultivated CultureLinkedInTwitterThanks for listening!

Is anything in the patent world ever really free?That question anchors a new Clause 8 conversation between host Eli Mazour and Professor Kristen Osenga, a University of Richmond law professor and one of the leading academic voices on standard essential patents.At the center of the discussion is the rise of so-called “royalty-free” technology standards. Osenga's point is straightforward: “free” often comes with strings attached — particularly for smaller innovators that may be required to cross-license valuable patent rights or accept terms they may later regret.Her main example is the Alliance for Open Media, the tech consortium behind a “royalty-free” video compression standard. The pitch sounds simple: use the standard without paying royalties. But, as Osenga explains, the real question is what companies may be giving up in return — and whether they fully understand the long-term cost of joining.She offers a simple analogy: a store gives away free croissants to get customers in the door. Customers build habits around it. Then one day the sign changes. In Osenga's view, the same risk exists here. Companies can build products and business models around terms that may not remain as favorable as they first appeared.From there, the discussion broadens into the wider ecosystem of royalty-free standards, cross-licensing organizations, defensive patent pledges, and emerging AI-related IP initiatives. What is driving these arrangements? Collaboration? Public relations? Strategic control? And what, exactly, should companies think through before signing on?As Osenga puts it: “Follow the money … where are these groups making their money? Because it's probably coming from some other part of their business model.”The episode also covers:* what the pattern of withdrawals from major cross-licensing organizations reveals about how these arrangements play out over time* SEP policy whiplash across US administrations, the Standard Essential Royalties Act (SERA), and where things stand now* the EU's proposed SEP framework, and why it stalled* the litigation funding debate, including why Osenga founded The Inventors Defense Alliance* the Tillis-Schiff letter to ANSI, China's push to shape global standards bodies, and the implications for US innovation leadership* why Osenga believes the RESTORE Act is critical to preserving US innovation leadershipIt is a conversation worth sharing with anyone focused on licensing, standards, or innovation policy.

A crafty new breed of social engineering attack is tricking users into launching malware straight from their clipboard, exposing a fresh vulnerability in Windows that even tech pros could fall for. Leo Laporte and Steve Gibson break down how the latest ClickFix and CrashFix exploits are outsmarting traditional defenses. The lowdown on last week's "no turn" picture of the week. Is an AI-driven hacking campaign a big deal now. Clause used in multiple Mexican government attacks. Apple continues to be confronted with age restrictions. COPPA needs an exception to allow age collection. Meta swamps law enforcement with AI-slop CSAM reports. Roskomnadzor has been busy blocking VPNs. Guess how many. The UK tries to report their self-scanning success. Remember that hacker who extorted the psychotherapy patients. Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters is actively recruiting women. Cisco lands another breathtakingly rare 10.0 CVSS. VulnCheck's report on 2025 vulnerabilities and exploits. Steve discovers a fabulous $72 Hardware Security Module. A listener shares an interesting AI service discovery. The very potent "ClickFix" exploit evolves Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-1067-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte Download or subscribe to Security Now at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: meter.com/securitynow guardsquare.com threatlocker.com/twit adaptivesecurity.com outsystems.com/twit