POPULARITY
During President Biden's first year in office, Attorney General Merrick Garland rescinded two key memos that were part of the Trump Administration's stated regulatory reform agenda: the Sessions Memo, which prohibited Department of Justice (DOJ) components from issuing “guidance documents” that effectively bound the public without undergoing notice-and-comment rulemaking, and the Brand Memo, which prohibited the Department from using noncompliance with DOJ's or other agencies' nonbinding guidance documents as a basis for affirmative civil enforcement actions. Calling the procedures laid out in the Sessions and Brand memos “overly restrictive,” Attorney General Garland replaced these memos with the Garland memo, which largely makes it easier for the Department to issue guidance and to rely on its own or other agencies' guidance documents in enforcement actions. What will be the impacts and effects of the Garland memo? Is this a sea change in favor of regulation by guidance, or a recognition by DOJ that guidance documents do not have the force of law? How have regulated entities responded? Acting Associate Attorney General (2017-2019) Jesse Panuccio and Assistant U.S. Attorney (2011-2019) Christopher Sabis will discuss these issues, moderated by Assistant Attorney General (2017-2020) Beth Williams. Featuring: --Jesse Panuccio, Partner, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP --Christopher Sabis, Member, Sherrard Roe Voigt Harbison --Moderator: Hon. Beth A. Williams, Board Member, U.S. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board; Former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Policy, U.S. Department of Justice --- To register, click the link above.
In this episode the Chuckleheads take on a topic that is so critical to healthcare organizations but, people make disturbing decisions every day and lead them down the road to significant problems. Don't miss a moment of this serious discussion that could have far reaching effects on you and your organization! A major challenge is issued at the end of the show and the questions is will it be accepted???
How to get a bank account for your cannabis business? You may need a Cannabis Banking Consultant.Cannabis banking has lots to do with the Cole memo, which we discuss how the Cole Memo survived the Sessions Memo in 2018. We also discuss the FinCEN guidance from department of treasury. The Marijuana:“marijuana limited” SARs with limited information for otherwise legitimate banking clients;"marijuana priority” SARs, for banking clients which implicate the Cole Memo concerns like non-cannabis crime, and; “marijuana termination” SARs, where there’s clear criminal activity like money laundering.https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/cannabis-banking-consultant/Support the show (https://www.youtube.com/cannabislegalizationnews)
Recorded on the day of the Cole & Ogden Memo’s rescission, Jonathan Blanks from the Cato Institute joins us and shares that from his vantage point, the Sessions Memo reverses a very sane practice of limiting the federal government’s power to intervene in state legal cannabis. In his words “the people of Colorado think we’ve spent too much money, wasted too much energy and jailed entirely too many people for smoking marijuana, so we’re not gonna do it any more, the federal government shouldn’t come in and interfere with that." So that puts us in a place where the voters asked for legal cannabis but instead of tax dollars from that industry going back to building that community, that communities tax dollars are being used in enforcement against the very will of we the people.
On January 4, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memo to all U.S. Attorneys discussing marijuana enforcement. The one-page memo rescinds previous DOJ guidance on marijuana enforcement, and has been seen by some as Sessions' crackdown on the legal cannabis industry. This podcast is a discussion with Alva Mather and Jay Dubow, leaders of Pepper's Cannabis Industry Group, about the Sessions memo and its impact. Topics discussed include how will the new DOJ guidance affect legal recreational marijuana; how does the Session's memo affect industries that support cannabis industries; and the political impact of the Sessions memo.
Today's episode tackles a number of breaking legal issues. First, the guys break down the recent memorandum by Attorney General Jeff Sessions on marijuana. What does this mean for the average recreational user in a state where pot is legal, like California? Listen and find out! Next, Andrew walks us through the recent decision by a three-judge panel in North Carolina invalidating that state's electoral districts. After that, the guys tackle a question from listener Jeremy Feldman about Net Neutrality and the Congressional Review Act. Finally, we end with an all-new Thomas (and Cara Santa Maria!) Take the Bar Exam Question #58 about the hottest new gadget, the Mitsubishi Walk-and-Talkman! Remember that you can play along with #TTTBE by retweeting our episode on Twitter or sharing it on Facebook along with your guess. We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Andrew was a guest on This Week In News With Kevin and Benedict, talking felon voting rights; give it a listen! Show Notes & Links The Controlled Substances Act is 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. You can read the Cole Memo here, and then the Sessions Memo rescinding it. This is the US Attorney's Manual discussed on the show. We first discussed gerrymandering back in OA 54, and then again in OA 72 and OA 80. Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
Far North Tokers, Sessions expert, comes back to discuss Sessions Memo 2018 rescinding all previous MJ Guidance from Feds. We started with Sessions, moved to US Attorney Schroder, and finally to resigned AK CCB Chair Mlynarik.