POPULARITY
22 episodes with assistant u
10 episodes with assistant u
9 episodes with assistant u
5 episodes with assistant u
9 episodes with assistant u
8 episodes with assistant u
3 episodes with assistant u
3 episodes with assistant u
8 episodes with assistant u
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
What does it really mean to be brave at work, and how can practicing bravery transform not just individuals, but entire organizations? In this powerful episode of The Quiet And Strong Podcast, host David Hall sits down with keynote speaker, crisis advisor, and author Jim Moorhead to unpack the true nature of bravery and why it's a critical—and learnable—skill for leaders and teams alike.You'll discover how bravery isn't reserved for heroes or reserved for dramatic moments, but can show up in everyday actions like speaking up, supporting colleagues, and trying new approaches. Jim shares strategies for fostering a culture of sustained bravery, practical steps leaders can take to encourage courageous behavior within their teams, and explains why psychological safety is essential for growth and innovation.This episode is packed with practical insights and inspiring stories for anyone who wants to foster a workplace where people feel empowered to speak up, innovate, and make a difference. Tune in to elevate your understanding of bravery, learn how you can cultivate it in your daily life and leadership, and be strong.Episode Link: QuietandStrong.com/231Jim Moorhead is a keynote speaker, Fortune 500 crisis advisor, and the author of The Instant Survivor: Right Ways To Respond When Things Go Wrong. With experience as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Goldman Sachs investment banker, and law firm partner, he helps leaders navigate uncertainty, spark innovation, and build cultures where employees are empowered to share their best ideas.Connect with Jim:Website | LinkedIn | TwitterX | Facebook- - -Contact the Host of the Quiet and Strong Podcast:David Hall Author, Speaker, Educator, Podcaster quietandstrong.comGobio.link/quietandstrongdavid [at] quietandstrong.com Take the FREE Personality Assessment: Typefinder Personality Assessment Follow David on your favorite social platform: Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | Youtube Get David's book:Minding Your Time: Time Management, Productivity, and Success, Especially for Introverts You may also like:Quiet & Strong Merchandise
On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .On the afternoon of Monday, June 2, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the prosecution's key witness, known by the pseudonym "Mia," concluded her testimony. Under cross-examination, defense attorney Brian Steel highlighted affectionate messages Mia had sent to Combs after her employment ended in 2017, including a 2019 text describing a dream where Combs rescued her from R. Kelly. Mia explained that she was "brainwashed" during that period, describing her relationship with Combs as one where "the highs were really high and the lows were really low," leading to confusion in trusting her instinctsFollowing Mia's testimony, the prosecution called Sylvia Oken, a custodian at The Beverly Hills Hotel, who testified about additional cleaning fees charged to Combs' hotel account, including a $500 charge for "oil damage." Oken noted that Combs often used aliases such as "Phillip Pines" during his stays . The trial, now in its fourth week, continues with Combs facing multiple charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. If convicted, he could face a life sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsshow lessCommentsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Prosecutors concluded their seven‑week case by presenting stark portrayals of Combs as the ringleader of a decades‑long criminal operation. They alleged he used fame and wealth to coerce ex‑girlfriends Cassie Ventura and “Jane” into drug‑fueled “freak‑offs” with hired escorts, and accused him of orchestrating violent acts—ranging from arson and kidnapping to bribery and forced labor—to enforce compliance. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik reiterated that one coerced sexual act could establish sex trafficking, and she urged the jury to hold Combs accountable for seeing himself as above the law.In contrast, defense attorney Marc Agnifilo attacked the government's case as an overreach into private consensual behavior, ridiculing the seizure of personal lubricants and framing the case as an attempt to criminalize a “swingers' lifestyle.” While acknowledging Combs' temper and violence, the defense argued those incidents did not amount to federal trafficking or racketeering offenses. Agnifilo emphasized consent and alleged financial incentives behind the accusations. The case is now in the hands of the jury, set to begin deliberating on Monday after receiving legal instructions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Key moments from the closing arguments at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Andrew McCarthy, Fox News Contributor, former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot To Rig An Election And Destroy A Presidency, joined The Guy Benson Show today to weigh in on the rise of radical leftism, including New York mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani's insane communist ideas. McCarthy also broke down last week's major Supreme Court rulings, including Donald Trump's significant victory on nationwide injunctions., and McCarthy unpacked Justice Kagan's surprising alignment with the progressive bloc. Andy then defended President Trump's legal authority to order strikes on Iran, although he suggested that he should have gone to Congress for the optics - and you can listen to the full interview below! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNN
Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witnessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypress
In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the final rebuttal of the government's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey delivered a sharp, surgical dismantling of the defense's narrative. She told the jury that Sean Combs' legal team had spent more time attacking the victims than actually refuting the charges. Comey emphasized that the defense wanted the jury to fixate on distractions—on credibility issues, sex, fame, and salacious details—rather than the through-line of abuse and control that ran across every victim's testimony. She asserted that the witnesses' imperfections didn't negate the consistency of their stories, but rather underscored how real and raw their trauma was. According to Comey, the defense's case relied not on innocence, but on shame—shaming the victims, questioning their motives, and hoping the jury would do the same.Comey then turned her focus to the broader implications of the case, urging jurors not to be seduced by the glitz and chaos that surrounded Combs' world. She reminded them that at its core, this wasn't about celebrity—it was about a man who used money, violence, and manipulation to maintain control over his inner circle. She walked them back through key testimony, highlighting how the accounts independently aligned on themes of fear, coercion, and isolation. In her final moments, Comey made a direct appeal to the jury's sense of duty—not to be dazzled, not to be intimidated, but to see the case for what it was: a clear, prosecutable pattern of criminal conduct under the law. Her tone was resolute, leaving the jury with a piercing reminder: the law doesn't bend for fame.And now...Diddy is on the clock as verdict watch is set to begin starating next week. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:@innercitypressBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Andrew McCarthy, Fox News Contributor, former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency, joined The Guy Benson Show today to weigh in on Senator Alex Padilla's removal from a DHS briefing, and McCarthy explained why Padilla's claims of oversight don't hold legal water when he isn't in the legislature. McCarthy also unpacked the legal merits of President Trump's mobilization of the National Guard in California amid the LA riots, pushing back on claims from Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass that the move is unlawful. Finally, McCarthy and Benson sounded the alarm on NYC Councilman Zohran Mamdani's radical leftist positions and discussed the risks if Mamdani is elected to be the mayor of NYC. Listen to the full interview below. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
On June 11, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey addressed the court privately, stating that the prosecution had uncovered what it believed to be a serious issue with Juror No. 6, which they described as a “lack of candor.” The government asserted that the juror had failed to be fully honest during the jury selection process and had possibly withheld important information that should have been disclosed to the court. Comey stressed that the prosecution was very reluctant to raise this concern but felt obligated to bring it forward after verifying the issue through further review.Defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro responded forcefully, arguing that the prosecution's move was a thinly veiled attempt to strike a Black juror from the panel in an effort to influence the jury's racial composition. Shapiro called the government's request improper and requested additional time to prepare a detailed written response citing legal precedent. Judge Subramanian granted the request, allowing both sides to submit written arguments and indicating that he would reserve a ruling on the matter until later in the week after reviewing all submissions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Expert weighs in on what Diddy juror's alleged 'lack of candor' means for trial | Fox News
On June 11, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey addressed the court privately, stating that the prosecution had uncovered what it believed to be a serious issue with Juror No. 6, which they described as a “lack of candor.” The government asserted that the juror had failed to be fully honest during the jury selection process and had possibly withheld important information that should have been disclosed to the court. Comey stressed that the prosecution was very reluctant to raise this concern but felt obligated to bring it forward after verifying the issue through further review.Defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro responded forcefully, arguing that the prosecution's move was a thinly veiled attempt to strike a Black juror from the panel in an effort to influence the jury's racial composition. Shapiro called the government's request improper and requested additional time to prepare a detailed written response citing legal precedent. Judge Subramanian granted the request, allowing both sides to submit written arguments and indicating that he would reserve a ruling on the matter until later in the week after reviewing all submissions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Expert weighs in on what Diddy juror's alleged 'lack of candor' means for trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On June 11, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey addressed the court privately, stating that the prosecution had uncovered what it believed to be a serious issue with Juror No. 6, which they described as a “lack of candor.” The government asserted that the juror had failed to be fully honest during the jury selection process and had possibly withheld important information that should have been disclosed to the court. Comey stressed that the prosecution was very reluctant to raise this concern but felt obligated to bring it forward after verifying the issue through further review.Defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro responded forcefully, arguing that the prosecution's move was a thinly veiled attempt to strike a Black juror from the panel in an effort to influence the jury's racial composition. Shapiro called the government's request improper and requested additional time to prepare a detailed written response citing legal precedent. Judge Subramanian granted the request, allowing both sides to submit written arguments and indicating that he would reserve a ruling on the matter until later in the week after reviewing all submissions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Expert weighs in on what Diddy juror's alleged 'lack of candor' means for trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Music journalist Touré has publicly criticized Jaguar Wright for spreading unsubstantiated claims about Sean "Diddy" Combs, particularly her assertions of rescuing women from his alleged "freak-off" parties. In a TikTok video, Touré questioned the credibility of Wright's statements, noting that these gatherings reportedly involved only Combs, his then-girlfriend Cassie, and male sex workers, leaving no evidence of Wright's involvement or of her aiding any victims. He emphasized that these events were intimate affairs held in hotel rooms, not large-scale parties where someone could intervene unnoticed. Touré has previously labeled Wright a conspiracy theorist, especially after her unfounded allegations against Jay-Z and Beyoncé on Piers Morgan's show, which led to legal action and a public apology from Morgan. He contends that Wright's claims lack factual basis and contribute to the spread of misinformation surrounding Combs' ongoing legal issues.Defense attorney Brian Steel faced significant criticism for his aggressive cross-examination of "Mia," a key witness in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Over two days, Steel's questioning was described by prosecutors as "harassing" and "humiliating," with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing him of yelling, sarcasm, and suggesting Mia was lying. The judge, while not finding the tone overtly inappropriate, cautioned Steel against being repetitive and noted concerns about his approach. Steel's tactics, including highlighting Mia's past affectionate messages to Combs and suggesting financial motives, were seen by some as potentially deterring other victims from coming forward. Despite the intense scrutiny, Mia maintained her allegations, explaining that her past communications were a result of being "brainwashed" during her employment with Combs .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Touré Slams Jaguar Wright For Claims About Diddy's Alleged "Feak-Offs"Sean 'Diddy' Combs' 'sarcastic' defense attorneys slammed for 'harassing' sex assault accuser with 'humiliating' questions
Music journalist Touré has publicly criticized Jaguar Wright for spreading unsubstantiated claims about Sean "Diddy" Combs, particularly her assertions of rescuing women from his alleged "freak-off" parties. In a TikTok video, Touré questioned the credibility of Wright's statements, noting that these gatherings reportedly involved only Combs, his then-girlfriend Cassie, and male sex workers, leaving no evidence of Wright's involvement or of her aiding any victims. He emphasized that these events were intimate affairs held in hotel rooms, not large-scale parties where someone could intervene unnoticed. Touré has previously labeled Wright a conspiracy theorist, especially after her unfounded allegations against Jay-Z and Beyoncé on Piers Morgan's show, which led to legal action and a public apology from Morgan. He contends that Wright's claims lack factual basis and contribute to the spread of misinformation surrounding Combs' ongoing legal issues.Defense attorney Brian Steel faced significant criticism for his aggressive cross-examination of "Mia," a key witness in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Over two days, Steel's questioning was described by prosecutors as "harassing" and "humiliating," with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing him of yelling, sarcasm, and suggesting Mia was lying. The judge, while not finding the tone overtly inappropriate, cautioned Steel against being repetitive and noted concerns about his approach. Steel's tactics, including highlighting Mia's past affectionate messages to Combs and suggesting financial motives, were seen by some as potentially deterring other victims from coming forward. Despite the intense scrutiny, Mia maintained her allegations, explaining that her past communications were a result of being "brainwashed" during her employment with Combs .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Touré Slams Jaguar Wright For Claims About Diddy's Alleged "Feak-Offs"Sean 'Diddy' Combs' 'sarcastic' defense attorneys slammed for 'harassing' sex assault accuser with 'humiliating' questionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Music journalist Touré has publicly criticized Jaguar Wright for spreading unsubstantiated claims about Sean "Diddy" Combs, particularly her assertions of rescuing women from his alleged "freak-off" parties. In a TikTok video, Touré questioned the credibility of Wright's statements, noting that these gatherings reportedly involved only Combs, his then-girlfriend Cassie, and male sex workers, leaving no evidence of Wright's involvement or of her aiding any victims. He emphasized that these events were intimate affairs held in hotel rooms, not large-scale parties where someone could intervene unnoticed. Touré has previously labeled Wright a conspiracy theorist, especially after her unfounded allegations against Jay-Z and Beyoncé on Piers Morgan's show, which led to legal action and a public apology from Morgan. He contends that Wright's claims lack factual basis and contribute to the spread of misinformation surrounding Combs' ongoing legal issues.Defense attorney Brian Steel faced significant criticism for his aggressive cross-examination of "Mia," a key witness in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Over two days, Steel's questioning was described by prosecutors as "harassing" and "humiliating," with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing him of yelling, sarcasm, and suggesting Mia was lying. The judge, while not finding the tone overtly inappropriate, cautioned Steel against being repetitive and noted concerns about his approach. Steel's tactics, including highlighting Mia's past affectionate messages to Combs and suggesting financial motives, were seen by some as potentially deterring other victims from coming forward. Despite the intense scrutiny, Mia maintained her allegations, explaining that her past communications were a result of being "brainwashed" during her employment with Combs .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Touré Slams Jaguar Wright For Claims About Diddy's Alleged "Feak-Offs"Sean 'Diddy' Combs' 'sarcastic' defense attorneys slammed for 'harassing' sex assault accuser with 'humiliating' questionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs
How the FBI Used 1,000 Bottles of Baby Oil to Build a RICO Case Against Diddy: Digital Evidence Breakdown The federal investigation that brought down Sean "Diddy" Combs represents one of the most sophisticated law enforcement operations in entertainment history. This comprehensive analysis examines how federal agents from Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI, DEA, and ATF coordinated a multi-agency takedown that began with Cassie Ventura's explosive lawsuit and culminated in RICO charges carrying a potential life sentence. Our investigation reveals the intricate timeline from November 2023 when Cassie filed her $20 million settlement lawsuit to the dramatic March 2024 simultaneous raids on Diddy's Los Angeles and Miami mansions. Federal agents discovered over 1,000 bottles of baby oil allegedly used in "Freak-Off" parties, three AR-15 rifles with defaced serial numbers, and thousands of videos that prosecutors claim Diddy used for blackmail. This video breaks down the digital forensics operation that analyzed over 10,500 terabytes of data from seized phones and computers. We explore how the FBI's Computer Analysis and Response Team, consisting of nearly 500 highly trained agents, extracted evidence even from devices Diddy thought were secure. The investigation utilized cutting-edge cell phone forensics tools, GPS tracking, metadata analysis, and social media enhancement techniques to build an airtight case. The Southern District of New York's prosecution strategy transforms individual allegations into a comprehensive RICO conspiracy case, treating Diddy's business empire as a criminal enterprise. Led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily Johnson, and their team, prosecutors argue that Bad Boy Entertainment, Combs Enterprises, and related businesses facilitated sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, and witness intimidation. We analyze the legal significance of charging a celebrity under racketeering laws typically reserved for organized crime families. The case demonstrates how modern federal investigators approach complex criminal enterprises in the digital age, using sophisticated analytical tools to map relationships, track communications, and visualize criminal operations spanning decades. Expert commentary from former federal prosecutors explains why this case could result in a life sentence and how it compares to other high-profile RICO prosecutions like R. Kelly and Harvey Weinstein. The investigation's speed—from initial lawsuit to federal indictment in less than a year—reveals either pre-existing intelligence or the extensive nature of the alleged criminal activity. #DiddyInvestigation #FederalRICO #DigitalForensics #LawEnforcement #SouthernDistrictNY #HSIRaids #CelebryJustice #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FederalCharges #CriminalEnterprise Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claims
On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful .The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In an Opinion and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, the court addressed the handling of Sean "Diddy" Combs's notes seized during a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center between October 28, 2024, and November 1, 2024. During the operation, a BOP investigator, referred to as Investigator-1, took photographs of nineteen pages of Combs's handwritten notes and sent them to the Government's filter team. The filter team is composed of Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) who are not involved in the prosecution of the case. Their role was to review and redact any privileged or irrelevant material before passing the documents to the prosecution team.The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court's scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution's access to evidence in this high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdf
In an Opinion and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, the court addressed the handling of Sean "Diddy" Combs's notes seized during a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center between October 28, 2024, and November 1, 2024. During the operation, a BOP investigator, referred to as Investigator-1, took photographs of nineteen pages of Combs's handwritten notes and sent them to the Government's filter team. The filter team is composed of Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) who are not involved in the prosecution of the case. Their role was to review and redact any privileged or irrelevant material before passing the documents to the prosecution team.The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court's scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution's access to evidence in this high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In an Opinion and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, the court addressed the handling of Sean "Diddy" Combs's notes seized during a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sweep at the Metropolitan Detention Center between October 28, 2024, and November 1, 2024. During the operation, a BOP investigator, referred to as Investigator-1, took photographs of nineteen pages of Combs's handwritten notes and sent them to the Government's filter team. The filter team is composed of Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) who are not involved in the prosecution of the case. Their role was to review and redact any privileged or irrelevant material before passing the documents to the prosecution team.The case team, which includes the agents and AUSAs directly responsible for investigating and prosecuting Combs, received the redacted notes from the filter team. This procedural safeguard is meant to ensure that privileged or irrelevant information is not improperly accessed by prosecutors handling the case. The ruling underscores the court's scrutiny over how seized evidence is handled, particularly when it involves sensitive materials belonging to the defendant. The order may influence future legal arguments about attorney-client privilege, due process, and the integrity of the prosecution's access to evidence in this high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.148.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNN
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Prosecution: During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witness
Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witnessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Ep. 228: Get excited for the Kentucky Derby with Spectrum Vice President Mark Kornegay! “Horses are like people—they can burn themselves out trying to keep up with the fastest ones, instead of running their own race,” he shared on this episode. Mark's career also includes leadership roles at Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, and he served as a Special Agent for the FBI and an Assistant U.S. Attorney. You will learn why preparation is everything and the best performers understand their strengths and craft a strategy that suits them. Our BONUS RESOURCE for this episode includes Don's favorite quotes from today's episode and a reflection question so you can apply today's insights. Do you want to write a book? In my new role as Publisher at Forbes Books and with the incredible resources and expertise of their team, we're making it easier than ever to help YOU to tell your story. Send us a message here to get started: https://books.forbes.com/don/ Looking for a speaker for your next event? From more than 30 years of interviewing and studying the greatest winners of all time Don offers these live and virtual presentations built to inspire your team towards personal and professional greatness. Special thanks to Samantha Clark and Guillermo Orellana for making this episode possible.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this episode, A'ndre speaks with Mark Linscott, former Assistant U.S. Trade Representative and one of Washington's most experienced trade negotiators, for an in-depth discussion on the logic and implications of President Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs.With decades of experience leading U.S. trade policy across multilateral institutions and bilateral platforms, Linscott offers expert analysis on how tariffs are being used as both an economic and geopolitical tool. The conversation covers the legal basis for executive tariff authority, the mechanics behind President Trump's “reciprocal tariffs,” and how Trump administration's actions will impact the global trade landscape.Topics covered include:• The fundamentals of tariff policy and the legal tools used to implement them• The scope and possible strategy behind Trump's April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs• Escalating U.S.-China trade tensions and the role of 145% tariffs• Reactions from key partners such as India, and the broader global economic impact• How tariffs are being increasingly intertwined with national security concernsMark Linscott brings a uniquely informed perspective on how current tariff policies may redefine America's role in global trade — and what to watch as the economic and political consequences unfold.
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst. For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Is the Trump Justice Department establishing a precedent that those who promote the administration's agenda can evade criminal accountability? In an excerpt from the CAFE Insider podcast, Joyce Vance and CAFE Contributor Elie Honig, former SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney, break down the alleged quid pro quo between the Trump administration and NYC Mayor Eric Adams. In a recent letter, former interim SDNY U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon accused acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove of seeking dismissal of the Adams case to further President Trump's hardline immigration policies. In the full episode, Joyce and Elie further discuss the turmoil at DOJ stemming from the Adams case: – The resignations of Sassoon, Assistant U.S. Attorney Hagan Scotten, and leaders of DOJ's public integrity unit after they refused to comply with Bove's demands; and – The procedure for federal prosecutors to seek dismissal of criminal charges and the upcoming court hearing on the Adams dismissal request. CAFE Insiders click HERE to listen to the full analysis. To become a member of CAFE Insider head to cafe.com/insider. You'll get access to full episodes of the podcast and other exclusive content. Subscribe to our YouTube channel. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
