Podcasts about rabinbach

Welcome to our second episode for Y2K GROUP CHAT. We recorded on two separate days in June 2020. fields delves into: COVID-19, the history of the spirometer, the study of labor and fatigue, his relationship with science, fact-checking, Taco Tuesdays, urban gardening, the history of medical theater, and biases in science. fields harrington is an emerging artist based in Brooklyn, New York. Follow us on Instagram: @y2kgroup Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more content about contemporary art Stay up-to-date with our Y2K Blog on our website for more news. Audio timestamps below: 1:17 - Intro with fields 2:16 - Y2K's reason for starting a podcast 3:20 - The podcast music introduction 5:17 - First question: how has your work and life changed since the pandemic? 6:36 - Whitney ISP catalog 7:44 - Braun text on the spirometer 8:56 - Rabinbach text on the human motor (thermodynamics, labor power and fatigue) 10:15 - Labor/work and fatigue in the body 11:17 - fields' mapping of physics and science and its origins 14:37 - Second question: how did the spirometer become the starting point for fields' research? 15:40 - fields' relationship with science 18:12 - Round 2 19:02 - News 19:42 - Twitter/Social Media 21:50 - Fact-checking 23:49 - Deepfake 25:21 - Taco Tuesdays 25:57 - Texas and High School 27:05 - Moving to New York in 2011 27:28 - The Black Beyond Zoom Artist Talk reference 28:52 - Y2K's casual podcast format 30:32 - Community college (finding photography and food ads) 33:23 - Photography at UNT 35:37 - Road trip / couch surfing to New York 37:43 - Working in urban food start-ups and problem solving 39:10 - Beginnings of a career as an artist 39:31 - UNT thesis 40:49 - Food and advertisement 44:31 - Produce Manager and researching solutions 49:06 - Back to school 52:07 - Types of work at UPENN 55:07 - Performing with acoustic levitation 56:53 - S-CURL in high school 1:00:43 - Performance at UPENN using S-CURL 1:03:48 - Reaction to performance 1:05:09 - Medical theater introduction 1:06:40 - UPENN and medical history 1:07:35 - Paintings of medical theater 1:09:54 - Hogarth's The Reward of Cruelty painting 1:11:13 - Robert Thom painting 1:12:36 - J. Marion Simms racist legacy 1:15:31 - "What remains is constant" by fields harrington 1:16:02 - Braun and Rabinbach texts 1:17:18 - The history of the study of fatigue for labor/work 1:19:01 - Benjamin Gould report 1:23:20 - Etienne-Jules Marey 1:25:07 - fields' essay as artwork 1:26:50 - COVID-19 and spirometer having similar biases 1:28:30 - Race table from Gould's report 1:30:23 - Statistics as surveillance 1:30:55 - Biases in science 1:32:57 - Approximation of a Mix performance question 1:37:40 - Protests and Uprising 1:41:31 - Future work

Primary source readers represent an unusual historical genre. Unlike editions, their aim is not to enable the reader to hear, as clearly as possible, the voice of a single historical personage or institution. Nor are they purely interpretive works in which the author’s voice is foregrounded. In this conversation with Princeton University historian Anson Rabinbach, we learn what methodological, but also what moral challenges faced him and coeditor Sander Gilman in crafting The Third Reich Sourcebook (University of California Press, 2013). We learn how they selected and how they decided to preface the voices of Nazi ideologues, politicians, fellow travellers and victims. With 411 primary documents that take the reader systematically through the key cultural fields and criminal activities of the regime, the Sourcebook represents a major engagement with the Nazi worldview by two leading intellectual historians. They found this worldview less uniform and internally consistent than others have surmised. Beyond the exaltation of the German Volk and the demonization of Jewry, much was up for grabs, including the epistemological framework meant to ground these core concepts. In this interview, Rabinbach paints a picture of German intellectual life under the Third Reich that was contradictory and complex, yet above all impoverished. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Primary source readers represent an unusual historical genre. Unlike editions, their aim is not to enable the reader to hear, as clearly as possible, the voice of a single historical personage or institution. Nor are they purely interpretive works in which the author’s voice is foregrounded. In this conversation with Princeton University historian Anson Rabinbach, we learn what methodological, but also what moral challenges faced him and coeditor Sander Gilman in crafting The Third Reich Sourcebook (University of California Press, 2013). We learn how they selected and how they decided to preface the voices of Nazi ideologues, politicians, fellow travellers and victims. With 411 primary documents that take the reader systematically through the key cultural fields and criminal activities of the regime, the Sourcebook represents a major engagement with the Nazi worldview by two leading intellectual historians. They found this worldview less uniform and internally consistent than others have surmised. Beyond the exaltation of the German Volk and the demonization of Jewry, much was up for grabs, including the epistemological framework meant to ground these core concepts. In this interview, Rabinbach paints a picture of German intellectual life under the Third Reich that was contradictory and complex, yet above all impoverished. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Primary source readers represent an unusual historical genre. Unlike editions, their aim is not to enable the reader to hear, as clearly as possible, the voice of a single historical personage or institution. Nor are they purely interpretive works in which the author’s voice is foregrounded. In this conversation with Princeton University historian Anson Rabinbach, we learn what methodological, but also what moral challenges faced him and coeditor Sander Gilman in crafting The Third Reich Sourcebook (University of California Press, 2013). We learn how they selected and how they decided to preface the voices of Nazi ideologues, politicians, fellow travellers and victims. With 411 primary documents that take the reader systematically through the key cultural fields and criminal activities of the regime, the Sourcebook represents a major engagement with the Nazi worldview by two leading intellectual historians. They found this worldview less uniform and internally consistent than others have surmised. Beyond the exaltation of the German Volk and the demonization of Jewry, much was up for grabs, including the epistemological framework meant to ground these core concepts. In this interview, Rabinbach paints a picture of German intellectual life under the Third Reich that was contradictory and complex, yet above all impoverished. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Primary source readers represent an unusual historical genre. Unlike editions, their aim is not to enable the reader to hear, as clearly as possible, the voice of a single historical personage or institution. Nor are they purely interpretive works in which the author’s voice is foregrounded. In this conversation with Princeton University historian Anson Rabinbach, we learn what methodological, but also what moral challenges faced him and coeditor Sander Gilman in crafting The Third Reich Sourcebook (University of California Press, 2013). We learn how they selected and how they decided to preface the voices of Nazi ideologues, politicians, fellow travellers and victims. With 411 primary documents that take the reader systematically through the key cultural fields and criminal activities of the regime, the Sourcebook represents a major engagement with the Nazi worldview by two leading intellectual historians. They found this worldview less uniform and internally consistent than others have surmised. Beyond the exaltation of the German Volk and the demonization of Jewry, much was up for grabs, including the epistemological framework meant to ground these core concepts. In this interview, Rabinbach paints a picture of German intellectual life under the Third Reich that was contradictory and complex, yet above all impoverished. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Primary source readers represent an unusual historical genre. Unlike editions, their aim is not to enable the reader to hear, as clearly as possible, the voice of a single historical personage or institution. Nor are they purely interpretive works in which the author’s voice is foregrounded. In this conversation with Princeton University historian Anson Rabinbach, we learn what methodological, but also what moral challenges faced him and coeditor Sander Gilman in crafting The Third Reich Sourcebook (University of California Press, 2013). We learn how they selected and how they decided to preface the voices of Nazi ideologues, politicians, fellow travellers and victims. With 411 primary documents that take the reader systematically through the key cultural fields and criminal activities of the regime, the Sourcebook represents a major engagement with the Nazi worldview by two leading intellectual historians. They found this worldview less uniform and internally consistent than others have surmised. Beyond the exaltation of the German Volk and the demonization of Jewry, much was up for grabs, including the epistemological framework meant to ground these core concepts. In this interview, Rabinbach paints a picture of German intellectual life under the Third Reich that was contradictory and complex, yet above all impoverished. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices