Yale Law Journal

In this Commentary, Josh Chafetz responds to Paul M. Thompson's criticisms of his proposal for a Congressional ethics oversight body. Chafetz argues that Thompson's position relies on the inapplicable paradigm of criminal law as a model for ethics enforcement. Instead, Chafetz claims, "Congressional ethics is not simply about punishing rulebreakers; rather, it aims to promote public trust in Congress and its members." Under this framework, "it is clear not only that our current system is in shambles, but also that the creation of Congressional Commissioners would be a useful corrective."

In this Commentary, Paul M. Thompson argues that Josh Chafetz's proposal for a Congressional ethics oversight board is unnecessary. Contrary to Chafetz, Thompson argues that recent ethics scandals are signs that a system that is functioning well.

In this Commentary, Jeffrey M. Hirsch argues for the elimination of state authority to regulate the workplace. Read by Christopher L. Griffin.

In this Commentary, Mitchell M. Gans, Bridget J. Crawford & Jonathan G. Blattmachr observe that new state laws establishing descendible rights of publicity may have unforeseen federal estate tax consequences. Read by Seth Hanlon.

Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard of the Indiana Supreme Court and Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court discuss emerging issues in state law from the role of the academy in state judicial decision-making to the practical challenges facing state judiciaries. Moderated by Embry Kidd, editor, The Yale Law Journal.

Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard discusses the leading role that state courts have taken in efforts to reform our historic jury system.

Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court discusses administrative reforms that are bringing true justice within Massachusetts state courts. Read by Embry Kidd.