Podcasts about Indiana Supreme Court

The state of Indiana's lawsuits against TikTok can move forward after the Indiana Supreme Court decided not to take on the social media company's appeals. Advocates for federal clean energy tax credits are speaking directly to U.S. Senators through ads — including Todd Young of Indiana. Indiana University could lose hundreds of degree programs as part of compliance with an array of new laws affecting higher education. Some Franklin Township residents are concerned about the proposal for a massive data center development on the south side of Marion County. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. WFYI News Now is produced by Drew Daudelin, Zach Bundy and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

A core tenet of the U.S. legal system is that an accused person must be competent to stand trial, which means a defendant can understand the charges against them and assist their lawyer in preparing a defense. In practice, defendants who need to be evaluated for competency often spend long periods in confinement because of a shortage of behavioral health services. When they are finally released, it's usually without ongoing care. On this episode, we spoke with three people who are involved in efforts to reform the process used to determine a defendant's mental competency: Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Loretta Rush and two Colorado legislators, Senator Judy Amabile, a Democrat, and Senator Byron Pelton, a Republican.Chief Justice Rush explained the dimensions of the problem and discussed how a national task force on the issue developed. Policy recommendations. Senator Amabile, who has sponsored legislation on the issue talked about how Colorado ended up with a significant backlog of cases. Senator Pelton explained some of the unique challenges people in rural America face when dealing with behavioral health issues. Resources“Legislative Primer Series on Front-End Justice: Competency to Stand Trial,” NCSL“Juvenile Justice: States with Juvenile Competency Laws,” NCSL

Guy Relford, "The Gun Guy," joins to talk a bill firearm bill in Washinton moving forward, Indiana Supreme Court case Turner vs State, and more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Indiana Charter School Board Director was forced to resign back in January. Construction may resume on an assisted living facility for Alzheimer's patients after Indiana Supreme Court ruling. Indiana House Ways and Means Chair introduces his version of property tax reform. Changing federal immigration policy is shining a light on local immigrant communities. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. WFYI News Now is produced by Drew Daudelin, Zach Bundy and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

More disciplinary charges filed against Attorney General Todd Rokita over statements made to the Indiana Supreme Court. Governor Braun calls on local leaders to prove their claims that his property tax proposal would harm their budgets and cut public safety dollars. A controversial education bill to promote “fostering a national identity” receives little support in committee. Host Brandon Smith is joined by Republican Mike O'Brien, Democrat Lindsay Haake, Leslie Bonilla Muñiz of the Indiana Capital Chronicle, and Jon Schwantes of Indiana Lawmakers to debate and discuss this week's top stories.

Following the U-S November election results farmers are optimistic about their future, despite the threat of tariffs. A Christmas Day mass shooting on the northeast side of Indianapolis leaves one woman dead. The Indiana Supreme Court establishes a new task force to strengthen guardianship oversight. A free online program teaches Indiana residents how to use a life saving medication. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of WFYI News Now was produced by Drew Daudelin, Zach Bundy and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

Podcast host Alexa Shrake interviews attorney Charles Braun about his side hobby performing as President Benjamin Harrison. Shrake also is joined by Indiana Lawyer Managing Editor Daniel Carson and reporter Maura Johnson to provide a roundup of the latest legal news on Indiana Supreme Court oral arguments and a settlement between the City of Carmel and a business

Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy made the rounds on Capitol Hill to discuss their department of government efficiency or DOGE. They met with House and Senate Republicans. They want to cut $2 trillion from government spending.The Indiana Supreme Court hears arguments in a historic case that could impact the lives of transgender teens.And Indiana's best political team debates President Joe Biden giving a pardon to his son.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A jury has found the two IMPD officers not guilty on all counts in the death of Herman Whitfield III.  Also, By a 3-2 ruling, The Indiana Supreme Court has denied the stay of execution for Fort Wayne killer Joseph Corcoran convicted of killing 4 peopleSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What makes a man confess to a crime he swears he didn't commit? That's the haunting question hanging over the case of Richard Allen, the alleged Delphi murderer. With confessions piling up and evidence mounting, the courtroom drama unfolds like a chilling novel. Yet, behind the scenes, questions about coerced confessions, psychological manipulation, and shady courtroom tactics paint a murkier picture. What about the psychologist digging through Reddit threads or the alleged threats hurled in confinement? Did the jury really hear the whole story—or just the parts they were meant to? When this case heads to the Indiana Supreme Court, could the conditions of confinement outweigh the weight of those confessions? And what if new evidence emerges? This one's a labyrinth of legal twists and moral dilemmas. What would you believe if you were on the jury? #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #TrueCrimeCommunity #LegalTwists #ConfessionsUnderPressure #DarkCourtroomDrama #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What makes a man confess to a crime he swears he didn't commit? That's the haunting question hanging over the case of Richard Allen, the alleged Delphi murderer. With confessions piling up and evidence mounting, the courtroom drama unfolds like a chilling novel. Yet, behind the scenes, questions about coerced confessions, psychological manipulation, and shady courtroom tactics paint a murkier picture. What about the psychologist digging through Reddit threads or the alleged threats hurled in confinement? Did the jury really hear the whole story—or just the parts they were meant to? When this case heads to the Indiana Supreme Court, could the conditions of confinement outweigh the weight of those confessions? And what if new evidence emerges? This one's a labyrinth of legal twists and moral dilemmas. What would you believe if you were on the jury? #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #TrueCrimeCommunity #LegalTwists #ConfessionsUnderPressure #DarkCourtroomDrama #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What makes a man confess to a crime he swears he didn't commit? That's the haunting question hanging over the case of Richard Allen, the alleged Delphi murderer. With confessions piling up and evidence mounting, the courtroom drama unfolds like a chilling novel. Yet, behind the scenes, questions about coerced confessions, psychological manipulation, and shady courtroom tactics paint a murkier picture. What about the psychologist digging through Reddit threads or the alleged threats hurled in confinement? Did the jury really hear the whole story—or just the parts they were meant to? When this case heads to the Indiana Supreme Court, could the conditions of confinement outweigh the weight of those confessions? And what if new evidence emerges? This one's a labyrinth of legal twists and moral dilemmas. What would you believe if you were on the jury? #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #TrueCrimeCommunity #LegalTwists #ConfessionsUnderPressure #DarkCourtroomDrama #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The nation's highest court will take up a case out of Tennessee that could have ripple effects across the country concerning gender affirming care for minors. The Indiana Supreme Court is asking state lawmakers for new money to help improve security in courthouses throughout the state. A committee tasked with making legislative recommendations on Medicaid once again submitted a final report with no recommendations. Future Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith threatened Tuesday to stop Indiana University's student newspaper. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of WFYI News Now was produced by Drew Daudelin and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the  opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 8:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

In this episode we are diving into the recent opinion/ruling passed by the Indiana supreme court when it comes to Richard Allen and his legal representation. One of the main issues that was being reviewed was the removal of Rozzi and Baldwin as Allen's lawyers. This ruling reinstated them.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Opinion Issued_ Reversed and Rem | PDF | Sixth Amendment To The United States Constitution | Appeal (scribd.com)

Gubernatorial candidates Mike Braun, Jennifer McCormick and Donald Rainwater debate for the last time before the election. More than half of the Indiana Supreme Court is on the ballot as voters decide whether to keep them on the bench. Multiple felonies of a former Clark County Sheriff prompt proposal of a new ethics reform legislation in order to show more transparency. Host Brandon Smith is joined by Democrat Ann DeLaney, Republican Chris Mitchem, Jon Schwantes of Indiana Lawmakers, and Niki Kelly of the Indiana Capital Chronicle to debate and discuss this week's top stories.

In this episode, Tom Fisher, Vice President and Director of Litigation for Ed Choice, discusses the critical role of legal advocacy in the school choice movement. He shares insights from his experience as Solicitor General of Indiana, the challenges faced in defending school choice programs, and the importance of parental choice in education. Fisher highlights the successes of Indiana's voucher program and the ongoing legal battles across the nation, emphasizing the need for continued advocacy to protect educational options for families. The conversation highlights the evolution of school choice in Indiana, particularly through the voucher system, and its role in expanding educational opportunities for families. Betsy and Robert break down the common misconceptions about school vouchers and explain how these programs empower parents, particularly in underserved communities. They also discuss the future of school choice, the importance of charter schools and private schools, and the critical need for educational freedom. Takeaways Tom Fisher leads Ed Choice Legal Advocates, focusing on litigation for school choice. The partnership with the Institute for Justice has been pivotal in defending school choice. Fisher's background as Solicitor General provided valuable experience in education law. The Indiana Supreme Court's ruling was a significant victory for school choice advocates. Litigation in state supreme courts focuses on legal arguments rather than evidence. School choice programs face ongoing legal challenges in various states. Indiana's unique approach includes vouchers, ESAs, and tax credit scholarships. The success of voucher programs is linked to parental choice and responsibility. Micro schools are an emerging trend in education, offering personalized options. Fisher is optimistic about the future of school choice and its impact on families. Did you find this episode informative? Help us out! Leave a review Share it with your friends Give us a 5 Star rating on your podcatcher of choice Learn more about IQE and MySchoolOptions: https://www.i4qed.org  Learn more about Tom's work at Ed Choice: https://www.edchoice.org 

Members of the Indianapolis Jewish community gathered Monday night to commemorate the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas militants. More than half of the Indiana Supreme Court is on the ballot this fall as voters will decide whether to keep them on the bench. Funding for more nonprofit organizations is available from the United Way of Central Indiana. More than $1.6 billion in city spending was approved by the Indianapolis City-County Council Monday night. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of WFYI News Now was produced by Drew Daudelin and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

Managing Editor Daniel Carson and Reporters Maura Johnson and Alexa Shrake provide the latest legal news this week from a 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on ballot access to Chief Justice Loretta Rush being elected a third term leading the Indiana Supreme Court. In the extended interview, Alexa chats with Linda Calvin, chief impact officer at Reboot Representation about Women IN Tech Week. 

Richard Allen Denied by the Indiana Supreme Court

Loretta Rush seeks a third term as Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. Fewer Indiana high school students enroll in FAFSA, with at least some blame placed on glitches in the rollout of a new version of the application. The Gary Community School Corporation officially shifts back to local control seven years after a state takeover. Host Brandon Smith is joined by Democrat Ann DeLaney, Republican Mike O'Brien, Oseye Boyd of Mirror Indy, and Leslie Bonilla Muñiz of the Indiana Capital Chronicle to debate and discuss this week's top stories.

The superintendent of Carmel Clay Schools will retire next year. Indianapolis Public Schools has announced they will hire a new principal of George Washington Carver School 87. Loretta Rush announced Tuesday she will seek another five-year term as Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will reconsider whether to list a rare Midwest snake under the Endangered Species Act. Indiana University researchers say a key piece that fueled the opioid epidemic is the way drugs are tracked. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org/news and follow us on social media to get comprehensive analysis and local news daily. Subscribe to WFYI News Now wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of WFYI News Now was produced by Drew Daudelin and Abriana Herron, with support from News Director Sarah Neal-Estes.

Tuesday, April 9th, 2024President Biden announces a new round of student debt relief, and it's the biggest one yet; a Key Democratic group pours $186 million into the battle for the House; the Brazilian Supreme Court has opened a criminal investigation into Elon Musk; Indiana Just approved Religious Exemptions From Abortion Bans; RFK Jr says his number one goal is to get Trump elected; there are more major problems with Trump's bond in the NYAG civil fraud trail; plus Allison and Dana deliver your good news. Promo Code:Go to drinkAG1.com/dailybeans to try AG1 and get a FREE 1-year supply of Vitamin D3 AND K2 AND 5 FREE AG1 Travel Packs with your first purchase. FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces New Plans that would Provide Relief to Borrowers Disproportionately Burdened by Student Loan DebtLawsuit challenging Indiana abortion ban survives a state challenge (AP)First on CNN: Key Democratic group pours $186 million in battle for House and preps for ‘trench warfare' with GOP (CNN)Elon Musk will be investigated over fake news and obstruction in Brazil after a Supreme Court order (AP) Subscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote?utm_source=TwitterAG&utm_medium=creator_organic&utm_campaign=muellershewrote&utm_content=FollowMehttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://www.threads.net/@muellershewrotehttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/From The Good News:Voices of the Newhttps://www.voicesofascension.org/votn24San Diego Humane Societyhttps://www.sdhumane.orgUpcoming Live Show Dateshttps://allisongill.com (for tickets and show dates)Sunday, June 2nd – Chicago IL – Schubas TavernFriday June 14th – Philadelphia PA – City WinerySaturday June 15th – New York NY – City WinerySunday June 16th – Boston MA – City WineryWednesday July 10th – Portland OR – Polaris Hall(with Dana!)Thursday July 11th – Seattle WA – The Triple Door(with Dana!)6/17/2024 Boston, MA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-Bos27/25/2024 Milwaukee, WI https://tinyurl.com/Beans-MKE7/28/2024 Nashville, TN - with Phil Williams https://tinyurl.com/Beans-Tenn7/31/2024 St. Louis, MO https://tinyurl.com/Beans-STL8/16/2024 Washington, DC - with Andy McCabe, Pete Strzok, Glenn Kirschner https://tinyurl.com/Beans-in-DC8/24/2024 San Francisco, CA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-SF Live Show Ticket Links:Chicago, IL https://tinyurl.com/Beans-ChiPhiladelphia, PA https://tinyurl.com/Beans-PhillyNew York, NY https://tinyurl.com/Beans-NYCBoston, MAhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-Bos2Portland, ORhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-PDXSeattle, WAhttps://tinyurl.com/Beans-SEA Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/OrPatreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

Ten reasons why Richard Allen might be found guilty of murdering Delphi teens, Abigail Williams and Liberty German. Is the evidence stacking up? Indiana Supreme Court slammed Judge Frances Gull. Defendant admitted he was on the trail and saw the girls on the day of the murder. An unspent bullet matching Allen's gun was recovered at the crime scene. What does the staging, the wounds, the autopsy tell us and why would Allen tell his wife and mother he killed the girls. Are Odin worshippers behind this and framing the accused killer?=======================================Catch up on all things Profiling Evil at: www.ProfilingEvil.com and sign up for the BOLO, our newsletter that's only available to subscribers.SUPPORT our Podcasts: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1213394/support

In the convoluted and high-stakes Delphi murder case, the latest development raises a critical question: What are the implications of alleged evidence destruction and contempt motions? Host Tony Brueski of the "Hidden Killers" podcast delves into this matter with Bob Motta, a defense attorney and host of "Defense Diaries." The case centers around Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders, with recent allegations of evidence destruction surfacing. Motta discusses the contempt motions filed by Prosecutor Nick McLeeland against defense attorneys Rossi and Baldwin, related to the leaked evidence. Motta questions the effectiveness of these motions, citing the Indiana Supreme Court's previous decisions and the concept of "res judicata," which implies that the issue has been previously litigated and resolved. Motta expresses skepticism about the likelihood of these motions succeeding, given the Indiana Supreme Court's clear stance in earlier rulings. He suggests that McLeeland's actions could be perceived as an attempt to tarnish the defense attorneys' reputations. The defense has countered these motions, with attorney Oscott's filing challenging McLeeland's handling of the contempt charges. Regarding the evidence destruction, Motta considers the possibility of intentional deletion but acknowledges the challenge in proving such allegations. He explains that lost recordings can happen due to technical issues but that in this case, the nature of the lost evidence raises suspicion. Motta also delves into the dynamics between Judge Gull and Prosecutor McLeeland. He speculates that Gull's decisions may not be influenced by a pre-existing relationship with McLeeland but rather by her inclination towards the prosecution. He suspects her actions in removing Rossi and Baldwin from the case were motivated by a desire to delay the trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the convoluted and high-stakes Delphi murder case, the latest development raises a critical question: What are the implications of alleged evidence destruction and contempt motions? Host Tony Brueski of the "Hidden Killers" podcast delves into this matter with Bob Motta, a defense attorney and host of "Defense Diaries." The case centers around Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders, with recent allegations of evidence destruction surfacing. Motta discusses the contempt motions filed by Prosecutor Nick McLeeland against defense attorneys Rossi and Baldwin, related to the leaked evidence. Motta questions the effectiveness of these motions, citing the Indiana Supreme Court's previous decisions and the concept of "res judicata," which implies that the issue has been previously litigated and resolved. Motta expresses skepticism about the likelihood of these motions succeeding, given the Indiana Supreme Court's clear stance in earlier rulings. He suggests that McLeeland's actions could be perceived as an attempt to tarnish the defense attorneys' reputations. The defense has countered these motions, with attorney Oscott's filing challenging McLeeland's handling of the contempt charges. Regarding the evidence destruction, Motta considers the possibility of intentional deletion but acknowledges the challenge in proving such allegations. He explains that lost recordings can happen due to technical issues but that in this case, the nature of the lost evidence raises suspicion. Motta also delves into the dynamics between Judge Gull and Prosecutor McLeeland. He speculates that Gull's decisions may not be influenced by a pre-existing relationship with McLeeland but rather by her inclination towards the prosecution. He suspects her actions in removing Rossi and Baldwin from the case were motivated by a desire to delay the trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Huge news from the Indiana Supreme Court. Audio from this episode taken from a Defense Diaries YT live that aired on 01-18-24. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Could the case against Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders, be unraveling due to a series of legal missteps and ethical quandaries? This is the question that looms large in the minds of those closely following one of Indiana's most bewildering and heart-wrenching cases. Recent developments have introduced a new layer of complexity to an already convoluted legal saga, highlighting potential flaws in the justice system's pursuit of truth and accountability. The latest bombshell in the Delphi murder case involves the alleged destruction of key video evidence, a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the community and the legal world. According to reports, video interviews with two individuals, previously considered suspects due to their Odinist beliefs, have been irrevocably lost due to a DVR malfunction. This loss of potential evidence has prompted Richard Allen's defense team to file a motion for the dismissal of charges, citing the impossibility of examining possibly exculpatory material. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, discussed these startling developments with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, shedding light on the psychological and systemic factors at play. The conversation ventured into the murky waters of judicial bias, evidence handling, and the ethical responsibilities of those within the legal system. The case's progression has been anything but straightforward, marred by controversial decisions and actions by key figures, notably Judge Frances Gull. Despite repeated calls for her recusal due to perceived bias, Gull remains at the helm, her recent rulings further fueling debate over her impartiality. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to keep Gull in place, coupled with the denied motions and the addition of new charges against Allen without new evidence, underscores the contentious nature of this legal battle. This saga's twists and turns highlight not only the complexities inherent in high-profile criminal cases but also the potential for human error and bias to cloud judgment. The destruction of critical video evidence, whether accidental or not, raises serious questions about the safeguards in place to protect such materials and the implications for Allen's right to a fair trial. Scott, in her conversation with Brueski, expressed dismay at the case's developments, pointing out the disturbing trend of evidence mishandling and judicial stubbornness. "It just is one of those cases where it gets stranger and stranger by the week," Scott remarked, emphasizing the importance of ethics and transparency in the legal process. The ongoing legal saga in Delphi serves as a stark reminder of the justice system's fragility and the crucial need for integrity, fairness, and due diligence. As the community and the nation watch, the case against Richard Allen continues to be as much about the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German as it is about the integrity of the legal system tasked with serving them. As new hearings loom and the defense fights for Allen's rights amidst a sea of legal and ethical challenges, one cannot help but wonder: Can justice truly be served in the shadow of such profound systemic issues? And what does the future hold for a case mired in controversy, unanswered questions, and the haunting memory of two young lives tragically cut short? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could the case against Richard Allen, accused of the Delphi murders, be unraveling due to a series of legal missteps and ethical quandaries? This is the question that looms large in the minds of those closely following one of Indiana's most bewildering and heart-wrenching cases. Recent developments have introduced a new layer of complexity to an already convoluted legal saga, highlighting potential flaws in the justice system's pursuit of truth and accountability. The latest bombshell in the Delphi murder case involves the alleged destruction of key video evidence, a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the community and the legal world. According to reports, video interviews with two individuals, previously considered suspects due to their Odinist beliefs, have been irrevocably lost due to a DVR malfunction. This loss of potential evidence has prompted Richard Allen's defense team to file a motion for the dismissal of charges, citing the impossibility of examining possibly exculpatory material. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, discussed these startling developments with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, shedding light on the psychological and systemic factors at play. The conversation ventured into the murky waters of judicial bias, evidence handling, and the ethical responsibilities of those within the legal system. The case's progression has been anything but straightforward, marred by controversial decisions and actions by key figures, notably Judge Frances Gull. Despite repeated calls for her recusal due to perceived bias, Gull remains at the helm, her recent rulings further fueling debate over her impartiality. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to keep Gull in place, coupled with the denied motions and the addition of new charges against Allen without new evidence, underscores the contentious nature of this legal battle. This saga's twists and turns highlight not only the complexities inherent in high-profile criminal cases but also the potential for human error and bias to cloud judgment. The destruction of critical video evidence, whether accidental or not, raises serious questions about the safeguards in place to protect such materials and the implications for Allen's right to a fair trial. Scott, in her conversation with Brueski, expressed dismay at the case's developments, pointing out the disturbing trend of evidence mishandling and judicial stubbornness. "It just is one of those cases where it gets stranger and stranger by the week," Scott remarked, emphasizing the importance of ethics and transparency in the legal process. The ongoing legal saga in Delphi serves as a stark reminder of the justice system's fragility and the crucial need for integrity, fairness, and due diligence. As the community and the nation watch, the case against Richard Allen continues to be as much about the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German as it is about the integrity of the legal system tasked with serving them. As new hearings loom and the defense fights for Allen's rights amidst a sea of legal and ethical challenges, one cannot help but wonder: Can justice truly be served in the shadow of such profound systemic issues? And what does the future hold for a case mired in controversy, unanswered questions, and the haunting memory of two young lives tragically cut short? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a case already mired in controversy and confusion, the Delphi murder investigation has hit another nerve-wracking point. Richard Allen, accused of the heinous double homicide of Abby Williams and Libby German, finds his defense team grappling with the revelation of key evidence being inadvertently destroyed. This latest development raises daunting questions about the integrity of the legal process and the pursuit of justice in Delphi, Indiana. The situation unfolded when Allen's attorneys filed a motion revealing that video and audio recordings of potential suspects had been erased due to a DVR program error, effectively obliterating crucial evidence that could potentially exculpate Allen or direct suspicion elsewhere. The error, dating back to February 20, 2017, eradicated interviews conducted in the immediate aftermath of the murders, including those of individuals identified as Odinists, further complicating an already complex case. This bombshell revelation has not only shocked the community but has also brought into sharp focus the actions of Judge Frances Gull, who has remained a polarizing figure throughout the proceedings. Despite the Indiana Supreme Court's unanimous decision to deny Allen's request for Judge Gull's disqualification, the recent disclosure of lost evidence puts her under renewed scrutiny. Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and attorney, shared his astonishment and concern with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Faddis highlighted the potential significance of the lost recordings, emphasizing the defense's obligation to explore alternate suspects. "This is so absurd," Faddis remarked, pointing out the gravity of the situation and its implications for Allen's defense. The destruction of evidence, whether accidental or not, introduces a "spoliation issue," according to Faddis. This legal principle suggests that the jury, if the case goes to trial, could infer the prosecution's negligence unfavorably, potentially influencing the outcome. Yet, Faddis expressed skepticism that the case would be dismissed solely on these grounds, advocating instead for a jury instruction that could allow them to consider the loss of evidence against the prosecution. The case's twists and turns have fueled widespread speculation and debate, with some wondering about the broader implications of such errors on the legal system's credibility. The question of Judge Gull's impartiality, given her history with the case and the recent developments, looms large, further complicating an already intricate legal battle. Amidst this tumult, the quest for truth and justice seems increasingly besieged by human error and systemic flaws. The loss of potentially exculpatory evidence not only hampers Allen's defense but also undermines public confidence in the judicial process. As the community and the nation watch closely, the case against Richard Allen continues to be as much about the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German as it is about the integrity of the legal system that seeks to serve them. As this legal drama unfolds, one can't help but ponder: In the quest for justice, how many more twists can this case endure before the truth is either revealed or forever obscured? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a case already mired in controversy and confusion, the Delphi murder investigation has hit another nerve-wracking point. Richard Allen, accused of the heinous double homicide of Abby Williams and Libby German, finds his defense team grappling with the revelation of key evidence being inadvertently destroyed. This latest development raises daunting questions about the integrity of the legal process and the pursuit of justice in Delphi, Indiana. The situation unfolded when Allen's attorneys filed a motion revealing that video and audio recordings of potential suspects had been erased due to a DVR program error, effectively obliterating crucial evidence that could potentially exculpate Allen or direct suspicion elsewhere. The error, dating back to February 20, 2017, eradicated interviews conducted in the immediate aftermath of the murders, including those of individuals identified as Odinists, further complicating an already complex case. This bombshell revelation has not only shocked the community but has also brought into sharp focus the actions of Judge Frances Gull, who has remained a polarizing figure throughout the proceedings. Despite the Indiana Supreme Court's unanimous decision to deny Allen's request for Judge Gull's disqualification, the recent disclosure of lost evidence puts her under renewed scrutiny. Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and attorney, shared his astonishment and concern with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Faddis highlighted the potential significance of the lost recordings, emphasizing the defense's obligation to explore alternate suspects. "This is so absurd," Faddis remarked, pointing out the gravity of the situation and its implications for Allen's defense. The destruction of evidence, whether accidental or not, introduces a "spoliation issue," according to Faddis. This legal principle suggests that the jury, if the case goes to trial, could infer the prosecution's negligence unfavorably, potentially influencing the outcome. Yet, Faddis expressed skepticism that the case would be dismissed solely on these grounds, advocating instead for a jury instruction that could allow them to consider the loss of evidence against the prosecution. The case's twists and turns have fueled widespread speculation and debate, with some wondering about the broader implications of such errors on the legal system's credibility. The question of Judge Gull's impartiality, given her history with the case and the recent developments, looms large, further complicating an already intricate legal battle. Amidst this tumult, the quest for truth and justice seems increasingly besieged by human error and systemic flaws. The loss of potentially exculpatory evidence not only hampers Allen's defense but also undermines public confidence in the judicial process. As the community and the nation watch closely, the case against Richard Allen continues to be as much about the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German as it is about the integrity of the legal system that seeks to serve them. As this legal drama unfolds, one can't help but ponder: In the quest for justice, how many more twists can this case endure before the truth is either revealed or forever obscured? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant development in the Delphi murder case, Richard Allen, a suspect in the killings of Abby Williams and Libby German, is pushing for the dismissal of charges, citing the erasure of critical video and audio recordings. Allen's attorneys filed a motion on Wednesday, raising concerns about the destruction of evidence and alleging negligence or intentional conduct by the state. The motion revolves around the disappearance of video and audio interviews with two suspected Odinists, who Allen's attorneys believe could be linked to the girls' murders. According to court documents, the recordings of these interviews, conducted in the initial week of the investigation following the February 2017 killings, were not included in the evidence provided to the defense. "This failure to disclose on the part of the Prosecutor, if not entirely intentional, rises to the level of an untimely failure of disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence," Allen's attorneys stated in their motion, expressing concerns about the impact on Allen's defense. Special Judge Frances Gull, overseeing the case, denied Allen's request for her disqualification, referencing a prior decision by the Indiana Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the defense contends that the erasure of key suspect interviews and delayed disclosure of evidence hinder their ability to establish Allen's innocence. The motion to dismiss highlights a broader controversy surrounding the handling of evidence in the case, with Allen's attorneys asserting that the destruction of material interviews demonstrates negligence or misconduct on the part of the state. As the legal battle continues, Judge Gull is yet to rule on the defense motions to reschedule the upcoming hearing, where arguments will be presented regarding additional charges against Allen and potential contempt of court actions against his attorneys. The hearing is scheduled for Monday, to be held in Fort Wayne, under Judge Gull's jurisdiction as a presiding superior court judge. The Delphi murder case has captured national attention, prompting scrutiny over the handling of evidence and procedural matters as the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the heart of Delphi, Indiana, a legal battle as convoluted and mysterious as the murders it seeks to resolve continues to unfold, casting a long shadow over the quest for justice. At the center of this legal labyrinth is Richard Allen, accused of the tragic murders of two young girls, and Judge Frances Gull, whose decisions have sparked intense debate and scrutiny. As the case against Allen twists through motions and appeals, the dynamics between the judiciary and the defense raise critical questions about fairness, bias, and the integrity of the legal process. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves into these complexities with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis, shedding light on the latest legal maneuvers and their implications. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to reinstate Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, has reopened old wounds and reignited tensions, particularly concerning Judge Gull's stance and actions. "Back on the Delphi merry-go-round," Brueski aptly describes the situation, as the judicial and defense sides lock horns once again. With Baldwin and Rozzi's return, the focus shifts back to Judge Gull, who remains a polarizing figure in this legal saga. Her decision to deny a Frank's hearing and several other motions without hearing arguments underscores a pattern of decisions that, to many, seem to favor the prosecution, undermining the defense's efforts to ensure a fair trial for Allen. The motion filed by Baldwin and Rozzi, requesting Judge Gull to recuse herself or be removed, stands as a testament to the defense's growing concerns over judicial impartiality. Faddis articulates the crux of the issue, highlighting the absurdity of allowing a judge to determine their own impartiality in the face of serious allegations. "It just strains the mind," Faddis remarks, pointing out the inherent flaw in a system that allows such self-assessment by a judge accused of bias. The prosecution's countermove, seeking to hold Allen's attorneys in contempt, adds another layer of conflict to an already tumultuous case, signaling a relentless battle over procedural matters that detract from the heart of the case: the pursuit of justice for the murdered girls. Despite these challenges, Faddis sees merit in the defense's motion, emphasizing the unusual and questionable nature of Judge Gull's previous decision to dismiss Baldwin and Rozzi. The ongoing legal skirmish raises doubts about the possibility of an unbiased trial under Gull's supervision, fueling speculation about her motivations and the potential impact on her career aspirations. As Brueski and Faddis explore the psychological underpinnings of the case, the conversation reveals a deeper concern: the human element in judicial decision-making. The specter of negative confirmation bias looms large, suggesting that preconceived notions and personal animosities could cloud judgment and compromise the fairness of the trial. "If you seriously do not like someone, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with," Faddis points out, illustrating the peril of allowing personal biases to influence judicial decisions. The unfolding drama in Delphi not only captivates but also alarms, serving as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between justice and judicial discretion. As the case progresses, one question hangs in the balance: Can Richard Allen receive a fair trial in the shadow of controversy and bias? As the community and the nation watch closely, the final resolution of this case may offer profound insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the legal system. But for now, the merry-go-round of motions, appeals, and judicial decisions continues to spin, leaving observers to wonder: When will the pursuit of justice take center stage, free from the distractions of legal maneuvering and personal biases? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the heart of Delphi, Indiana, a legal battle as convoluted and mysterious as the murders it seeks to resolve continues to unfold, casting a long shadow over the quest for justice. At the center of this legal labyrinth is Richard Allen, accused of the tragic murders of two young girls, and Judge Frances Gull, whose decisions have sparked intense debate and scrutiny. As the case against Allen twists through motions and appeals, the dynamics between the judiciary and the defense raise critical questions about fairness, bias, and the integrity of the legal process. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves into these complexities with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis, shedding light on the latest legal maneuvers and their implications. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to reinstate Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, has reopened old wounds and reignited tensions, particularly concerning Judge Gull's stance and actions. "Back on the Delphi merry-go-round," Brueski aptly describes the situation, as the judicial and defense sides lock horns once again. With Baldwin and Rozzi's return, the focus shifts back to Judge Gull, who remains a polarizing figure in this legal saga. Her decision to deny a Frank's hearing and several other motions without hearing arguments underscores a pattern of decisions that, to many, seem to favor the prosecution, undermining the defense's efforts to ensure a fair trial for Allen. The motion filed by Baldwin and Rozzi, requesting Judge Gull to recuse herself or be removed, stands as a testament to the defense's growing concerns over judicial impartiality. Faddis articulates the crux of the issue, highlighting the absurdity of allowing a judge to determine their own impartiality in the face of serious allegations. "It just strains the mind," Faddis remarks, pointing out the inherent flaw in a system that allows such self-assessment by a judge accused of bias. The prosecution's countermove, seeking to hold Allen's attorneys in contempt, adds another layer of conflict to an already tumultuous case, signaling a relentless battle over procedural matters that detract from the heart of the case: the pursuit of justice for the murdered girls. Despite these challenges, Faddis sees merit in the defense's motion, emphasizing the unusual and questionable nature of Judge Gull's previous decision to dismiss Baldwin and Rozzi. The ongoing legal skirmish raises doubts about the possibility of an unbiased trial under Gull's supervision, fueling speculation about her motivations and the potential impact on her career aspirations. As Brueski and Faddis explore the psychological underpinnings of the case, the conversation reveals a deeper concern: the human element in judicial decision-making. The specter of negative confirmation bias looms large, suggesting that preconceived notions and personal animosities could cloud judgment and compromise the fairness of the trial. "If you seriously do not like someone, there's nothing they can say that you'll agree with," Faddis points out, illustrating the peril of allowing personal biases to influence judicial decisions. The unfolding drama in Delphi not only captivates but also alarms, serving as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between justice and judicial discretion. As the case progresses, one question hangs in the balance: Can Richard Allen receive a fair trial in the shadow of controversy and bias? As the community and the nation watch closely, the final resolution of this case may offer profound insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the legal system. But for now, the merry-go-round of motions, appeals, and judicial decisions continues to spin, leaving observers to wonder: When will the pursuit of justice take center stage, free from the distractions of legal maneuvering and personal biases? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant development in the Delphi murder case, Richard Allen, a suspect in the killings of Abby Williams and Libby German, is pushing for the dismissal of charges, citing the erasure of critical video and audio recordings. Allen's attorneys filed a motion on Wednesday, raising concerns about the destruction of evidence and alleging negligence or intentional conduct by the state. The motion revolves around the disappearance of video and audio interviews with two suspected Odinists, who Allen's attorneys believe could be linked to the girls' murders. According to court documents, the recordings of these interviews, conducted in the initial week of the investigation following the February 2017 killings, were not included in the evidence provided to the defense. "This failure to disclose on the part of the Prosecutor, if not entirely intentional, rises to the level of an untimely failure of disclosure of potentially exculpatory evidence," Allen's attorneys stated in their motion, expressing concerns about the impact on Allen's defense. Special Judge Frances Gull, overseeing the case, denied Allen's request for her disqualification, referencing a prior decision by the Indiana Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the defense contends that the erasure of key suspect interviews and delayed disclosure of evidence hinder their ability to establish Allen's innocence. The motion to dismiss highlights a broader controversy surrounding the handling of evidence in the case, with Allen's attorneys asserting that the destruction of material interviews demonstrates negligence or misconduct on the part of the state. As the legal battle continues, Judge Gull is yet to rule on the defense motions to reschedule the upcoming hearing, where arguments will be presented regarding additional charges against Allen and potential contempt of court actions against his attorneys. The hearing is scheduled for Monday, to be held in Fort Wayne, under Judge Gull's jurisdiction as a presiding superior court judge. The Delphi murder case has captured national attention, prompting scrutiny over the handling of evidence and procedural matters as the pursuit of justice for Abby Williams and Libby German continues. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Richard Allen, the accused in the Delphi murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, is seeking dismissal of his charges following the deletion of video and audio evidence. His legal team submitted a motion on Wednesday, arguing for dismissal due to the loss of crucial interviews with two individuals suspected of Odinism, who they suggest could be the actual perpetrators. Additionally, on Wednesday, Special Judge Frances Gull issued an order rejecting Allen's request for her to step down from the case. This decision was made without a hearing, in line with the Indiana Supreme Court's unanimous rejection of a similar request by Allen on January 18, 2024. The motion for dismissal highlights that the state's evidence shared with the defense last week did not include recordings of interviews conducted on February 17 and February 19, 2017, with the two Odinist suspects. According to the motion, these recordings were lost due to a DVR program error on September 20, 2017, which resulted in all recordings up to February 20, 2017, being overwritten. This loss of evidence, which includes interviews from the initial week of the investigation following the murder of the teenagers on February 13, 2017, is seen by Allen's attorneys as either negligent or intentional destruction of key evidence by the state. In a memorandum filed on September 18, 2023, Allen's defense team proposed a theory that Libby and Abby were victims of a ritual sacrifice by Odinists, not by Allen. They argue that the loss of these interviews is critical, as they could potentially exonerate Allen. Furthermore, the motion points out that an 85-page report from a Rushville police officer's investigation into Odinism was withheld for over four months and only shared with Allen's attorneys after the prosecution became aware of the defense's knowledge of a possible Odinism link. The defense contends that this delay in disclosure, which they deem either intentional or a significant oversight, amounts to a failure to provide potentially exculpatory evidence. This, coupled with the missing interviews of the two Odinist suspects, casts doubt and suspicion on the case against Allen. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest chapter of the Delphi murder case, Judge Frances Gull and the reinstated defense attorneys for Richard Allen, Baldwin and Rozzi, continue to navigate a complex legal landscape. This ongoing saga, marked by denied motions and heightened scrutiny, poses critical questions about the balance of justice and judicial discretion. The Indiana Supreme Court's decision to deny a speedy trial request for Allen, while reinstating his chosen attorneys, has thrown the case into further uncertainty. Despite this, Judge Gull maintains her position, immediately rejecting a Frank's hearing that had previously been on the brink of commencement. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and podcast host, was not surprised by these developments. "I thought that they'd get back on. I thought that they would keep her on, and I thought that the 70-day trial date was of no import to the Supreme Court," Motta stated. Gull's decisions, particularly her swift dismissal of key motions without hearings, have raised eyebrows in the legal community. The lack of a comprehensive record and her seemingly unilateral approach to the case underscore a growing concern about the impartiality of the judicial process. Motta highlighted the peculiar speed of the Supreme Court's order reinstating Baldwin and Rozzi, noting its unusual timing and the absence of a detailed opinion. The case's complexity is further deepened by the fact that Gull's decisions are under intense scrutiny, given her aspirations to join the Indiana Supreme Court. Her actions in the Delphi case could significantly impact her judicial career. Motta pondered whether Gull's ambitions might influence her decisions in the trial. "Everything that she continues to do in this has to be seen as a detriment to her bid to move up to the high court," he observed. Motta also questioned the logic behind Gull's actions following the Supreme Court's order. By denying three major motions - the Frank's hearing, the motion to suppress, and the motion in limine regarding ballistics - without substantial rationale or case law, Gull's approach appears to contrast sharply with the Supreme Court's guidance for a more detailed record. “She's flying from the hip man,” Motta remarked, emphasizing the reckless nature of such decisions in a high-profile case. The contrast between Gull's approach and the attorneys' efforts to represent Allen adequately highlights a significant disconnect. Motta expressed his concern about the potential impact of these judicial decisions on the integrity of the trial and the broader implications for the legal system. As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, questions linger about the balance between judicial discretion and the pursuit of justice. Will Judge Gull's approach to the case stand up to the scrutiny it faces, or will it ultimately prove to be a detriment to her aspirations and the legal process itself? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice being served in the Delphi murder case? This question resonates strongly as new developments emerge in the case of Richard Allen, accused of a harrowing crime. The recent handling of Allen's situation, particularly his prison conditions and denied rights, has sparked a heated debate about the integrity of the legal system in Indiana. In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski, along with attorney Eric Faddis, delved into the complexities surrounding Allen's case. The discussion highlighted the apparent violations of Allen's legal rights and the judiciary's questionable decisions. Allen's attorneys have raised alarms over his treatment in prison, likening his conditions to those of Hannibal Lecter. According to Faddis, Allen's inability to communicate privately with his legal team is “asinine” and a direct violation of his rights. “Are you telling me that there is not some secured cell in that whole incarceration facility in which Richard Allen could meet privately with his attorneys?” Faddis questions, highlighting the gravity of this oversight. Another point of contention is the denial of Allen's right to a speedy trial, a fundamental legal right. Despite requests from Allen and his attorneys, the Indiana Supreme Court has denied this motion. This decision raises serious concerns about the commitment of the legal system to uphold basic constitutional rights. “How are these things going on where we say you have these rights? It's right in front of all of us,” Brueski emphasizes. The role of Judge Gull in this case has come under intense scrutiny. Accusations of bias and unilateral decision-making without proper hearings have cast doubt on the fairness of the proceedings. Faddis points out that judges, being former lawyers, sometimes use their skills to navigate around the law, potentially leading to unjust outcomes. One of the most troubling aspects highlighted in the discussion is the lack of accountability for judges who deviate from the law. “Is there really some deterrent for these judges to not go rogue and just decide whatever they want? There isn't a huge deterrent,” Faddis admits. This lack of checks and balances in the judicial system poses a significant threat to the principle of justice. While some judges are elected and thus somewhat accountable to public opinion, Faddis notes that disciplinary actions for not following the law are rare. This raises concerns about the power judges hold and the potential for abuse of this power. As the case progresses, the legal community and the public are closely monitoring the developments. The handling of Richard Allen's case not only affects the immediate parties involved but also reflects on the broader judicial system's ability to administer justice fairly. In a legal landscape where a defendant's basic rights are being questioned, the integrity of the entire system comes under scrutiny. Will Richard Allen receive a fair trial, or will the legal system fail him? The answers to these questions will have far-reaching implications for the rule of law and public trust in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice being compromised in the Delphi murder case? This question lingers in the air as the case against Richard Allen, accused of the gruesome murders of two young girls, continues to unfold amidst controversial judicial decisions. The most recent twist – the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, by the Indiana Supreme Court – has sparked a new wave of debate and scrutiny, particularly regarding Judge Gull's actions. Former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the latest developments. Faddis's insights reveal a troubling pattern of judicial decisions that seem to favor the prosecution, raising concerns about the fairness of the trial. Judge Gull's refusal to grant a Franks hearing, along with denying several other defense motions without proper hearings, paints a picture of a judicial system potentially skewed against the defendant. Faddis observed, “When we have time after time, ruling after ruling against one side, without even so much as a hearing, people start to wonder – is this guy really getting a fair trial?” The denial of a Frank's hearing, crucial for challenging the accuracy of information in a warrant, underscores the complexity and contentious nature of this case. Faddis's experience as a prosecutor lends weight to his concern about the judge's seemingly unilateral decision-making process. “All they're asking for is a hearing... The judge is saying, ‘Hey, I'm not even going to hear you out,'” Faddis noted, indicating a potential bias in the courtroom. The defense's struggle to present their case fully is starkly apparent. The denied motions and the lack of hearings have hindered the defense's ability to challenge key pieces of evidence and police conduct. This situation raises significant doubts about the fairness and impartiality of the legal proceedings. Allen's situation is further complicated by his transfer to various incarceration facilities, a move unusual for someone not yet convicted. Faddis expressed concern about this treatment, which seems to add another layer of disadvantage to Allen's case. The discussion also veered into speculation about Judge Gull's motivations. With her known aspirations to join the Supreme Court, some wonder if her hardline stance in this high-profile case is a strategic move to bolster her career. “Is this tough law and order persona more likely to lead to advancement?” Faddis pondered, acknowledging that decisions favoring defendants are often less popular. The case's unusual turns, including the allegations of Odinist affiliations within law enforcement, have caught public attention. The inability of Allen's defense team to delve into these matters in court only fuels public skepticism about the trial's fairness. As the case proceeds, the reinstated defense attorneys face a challenging path ahead. Their ability to navigate this complex legal landscape and counteract the apparent judicial bias will be crucial in ensuring that Richard Allen receives a fair and impartial trial. The Delphi murder case continues to be a test of the American legal system's ability to uphold justice impartially. The actions of Judge Gull and the court's response to Richard Allen's defense team's efforts remain under close scrutiny as the public awaits a fair resolution. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorneys representing Richard Allen, the suspect in the Delphi murders case, have filed a motion seeking the removal of Special Judge Fran Gull from the proceedings. In a recent legal maneuver, attorneys Andrew Baldwin and Bradley Rozzi argued that Judge Gull should be replaced or should recuse herself from the case.    The motion is the latest development in a series of legal maneuvers surrounding the Delphi murders case. Richard Allen faces charges related to the deaths of Abby Williams and Libby German in February 2017 near the Monon High Bridge in Delphi, Indiana.    Baldwin and Rozzi, who were recently reinstated as Allen's defense team, are now seeking Judge Gull's removal from the case. This move follows Gull's earlier call for their removal, citing a social media leak of evidence as a factor. Although Baldwin and Rozzi initially resigned, they later contended that they did so under pressure. Subsequently, two new attorneys were appointed to represent Allen.    The reinstatement of Baldwin and Rozzi involved a legal battle that reached the Indiana Supreme Court. While the highest court in the state reinstated the defense attorneys, they also denied a motion to remove Judge Gull from the case.    In their latest motion seeking Judge Gull's removal, Baldwin and Rozzi, on behalf of their client Richard Allen, questioned Gull's impartiality and her ability to oversee the case without bias. They expressed concerns that Gull's previous actions had affected their attorney-client relationship.    The motion argued that Gull's recusal would help eliminate any perception of impropriety in the case. It questioned whether Gull, having previously removed the defense attorneys, could make rulings without raising doubts about her impartiality.    During the course of the proceedings, Gull had accused Rozzi and Baldwin of acting negligently and with incompetence in their defense of Allen, alleging violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. She also expressed "grave concerns" about their ability to represent him. The defense attorneys contended that Gull's actions had violated Allen's constitutional right to due process.    In a 22-page affidavit accompanying the motion, Richard Allen accused Judge Gull of misleading the public during the October 19 proceedings when she announced the attorneys' withdrawal from the case. He also claimed that Gull had interfered with his right to a speedy trial.    The affidavit further alleged that Gull had treated the prosecution more favorably than the defense. Allen accused Gull of allowing the prosecution to withhold potentially exculpatory evidence for months, while she had criticized the defense attorneys for their actions.    The motion argued that Judge Gull had interfered with Allen's right to a speedy trial by preventing him from having counsel of his choosing, resulting in trial delays. Additionally, Allen claimed that his confinement at Westville Correctional Facility since his arrest in October 2022 had led to both mental and physical deterioration.    Furthermore, the affidavit asserted that Judge Gull had shielded certain defense documents and records from public view, violating administrative rules from the Indiana Supreme Court and compromising public access.    The motion ultimately called for Judge Gull's removal or recusal from the case, citing concerns about her impartiality and her impact on the attorney-client relationship. It remains to be seen how this latest development will affect the ongoing legal proceedings in the Delphi murders case. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant twist in the Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated defense attorneys Baldwin and Rozzi to represent Richard Allen. This decision, although positive for Allen, leaves other key motions unresolved, creating a complex legal scenario. "It was a great experience," shares Bob Motta, a defense attorney who witnessed the proceedings. "The courtroom was packed... but Judge Gull did not show up," he adds, highlighting the tension surrounding the case.  Judge Gull, amidst controversy, remains on the case despite motions for her removal. Motta speculates on Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court and how her current role could impact her career. "She's made three applications to the court... it's a very political thing," Motta observes, pondering whether Gull might step back to focus on her new responsibilities as Allen County's chief judge.  In a surprising turn, Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland filed additional kidnapping and murder charges against Richard Allen. Motta questions the timing and motive behind this move, suggesting it might be a PR strategy rather than a legal necessity. "Nothing changed factually... it felt like just a PR move more than anything else," Motta explains, expressing skepticism over the legal impact of these new charges.  With Baldwin and Rozzi back in the game, the dynamics of the trial are set to change. Motta anticipates that they will file for a speedy trial, potentially hastening the trial date. However, the unresolved issues with Judge Gull and the new charges complicate the path ahead. "It's going to be tough for the public to not think when she's denying things left and right, that it's not personal," Motta reflects on Gull's involvement.  As the Delphi murder case progresses, it remains mired in legal complexities and personal animosities. The reinstatement of Allen's original defense attorneys marks a significant step, but the unresolved status of Judge Gull and the additional charges filed by the prosecutor add layers of uncertainty. Will these legal maneuvers bring clarity to the case, or will they further entangle it in controversy and doubt?  As the Delphi murder case unfolds, the recent developments pose more questions than answers. With Baldwin and Rozzi back on board and Judge Gull's role still contentious, the path to justice remains unclear. Can the legal system navigate these challenges to bring closure to this high-profile case, or will the complexities continue to hinder the pursuit of truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent development that has stirred the already complex Delphi murder case, the Indiana Supreme Court has reinstated Richard Allen's defense attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. This decision, while pivotal, leaves other critical motions unresolved. Defense attorney Bob Motta delves into the nuances of this situation and its potential ramifications.  The decision to keep Judge Gull on the case, despite motions for her removal, adds another layer of intrigue. Motta, who was present during the Supreme Court's oral arguments, notes, "The issue of removing Gull wasn't even brought up." With Gull's aspirations to join the Supreme Court, her future decisions in this case will likely be under intense scrutiny. Motta ponders whether this situation will lead Gull to step back voluntarily, considering her recent appointment as the chief judge in Allen County.  Although the court denied the motion for a trial within 70 days, Motta anticipates that Baldwin and Rozzi may file a demand for a speedy trial once the issues surrounding their reinstatement and Judge Gull's involvement are resolved. This move, if executed, would mark a significant shift in the case's timeline. "I anticipate that the trial date will get pushed up again," Motta predicts.  Addressing concerns about a potential delay if a new judge takes over, Motta reassures that it wouldn't necessarily slow down the case. "The judge would be starting at the exact same place that she's currently at," he explains, emphasizing that Judge Gull hasn't made any substantive rulings yet.  Motta clarifies the nuances of a speedy trial demand, highlighting that while it sets a firm trial date, the defense's motions can extend the timeframe without penalty. This aspect is crucial in understanding the defense's strategy and how it might play out in court.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the recent rulings and potential strategic moves by the defense paint a picture of a legal battle fraught with complexities. With Richard Allen's attorneys reinstated and the question of Judge Gull's involvement still lingering, the case's trajectory remains unpredictable. Will these legal maneuvers bring the case closer to a resolution, or will they add further twists to an already intricate legal saga?  The return of Baldwin and Rozzi and the unresolved status of Judge Gull's involvement in the Delphi murder case raise critical questions about the pursuit of justice. As the defense prepares its next moves, will the legal system navigate these challenges effectively, or will the complexities of the case further delay the quest for truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is justice on the horizon for Richard Allen, the man accused of the Delphi murders? Recent developments in the case present a convoluted picture, as the Indiana Supreme Court reinstates his attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, while simultaneously denying other critical motions. Defense attorney Bob Motta weighs in on the perplexing state of affairs.  In a striking decision, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of reinstating Richard Allen's preferred attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi. "It's exactly what I predicted," shares Motta, reflecting on the intense courtroom atmosphere during the oral arguments.  The judges' probing questions and the high stakes of the case made the proceedings a noteworthy experience for legal enthusiasts.  Despite the reinstatement of Allen's attorneys, Judge Gull remains on the case, raising concerns about the trial's impartiality. Motta speculates on the potential for Judge Gull to either hold a hearing regarding the removal of Baldwin and Rozzi or address the motion filed by Rozzi for her recusal. The Supreme Court's forthcoming opinion on these issues is eagerly awaited, as it will shape the future course of action.  Motta emphasizes the strategic nature of the defense's request for a speedy trial within 70 days, a motion ultimately denied by the court. This tactic, aimed at catching prosecutor McLeLand off-guard, highlights the intricate chess game unfolding within the legal framework. Motta anticipates that Allen's defense will file a demand for a speedy trial, potentially advancing the trial date.  The legal community and those closely following the case are now awaiting the Indiana Supreme Court's detailed opinion. This document is expected to shed light on the rationale behind the court's decisions and provide guidance for the next steps. "We need to see the opinion," Motta stresses, indicating that it will be pivotal in determining the case's trajectory.  As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the reinstatement of Richard Allen's attorneys marks a significant, albeit complex, development. With Judge Gull still presiding and key motions denied, the path to justice remains fraught with legal intricacies. Will the upcoming Supreme Court opinion bring clarity and direction, or will it add another layer to this already tangled case?  The Delphi murder case stands at a critical juncture, with the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions introducing new dynamics. As the legal community braces for the court's detailed opinion, questions linger about the fairness of the trial and the fate of Richard Allen. In the quest for justice, will the truth finally emerge from the shadows of legal complexity? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We dig into how oral argument works and what to expect as the Delphi case goes before the Indiana Supreme Court. Sponsors: Progressive Insurance

Tylee Ryan's remains to be released to her next of kin* Death still on the table for Chad Daybell* Ruby Franke pleads guilty* The prosecution wants a summer trial date for Bryan Kohberger* The house is set to be demolished beginning on December 28th.* Alex Murdaugh will have an evidentiary hearing next month in Columbia, SC* Colleton County Clerk Of Court becky Hill admits plagiarism from BBC article* Indiana Supreme Court will allow streaming of Richard Allen arguments on January 18, 2024Donate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibisThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4447192/advertisement