Podcasts about congressional

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

On Monday, Oregon Democratic U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and Alaska Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski led a group of Democratic Senators to urge the National Science Foundation to stop its plans to dismantle a nearly $400 million ocean monitoring network. The Associated Press reported on the letter Sens. Merkley and Murkowski wrote to the NSF, which was signed by nine other U.S. Senators, including Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell of Washington. More than two dozen Democratic U.S. Representatives signed onto a separate letter, per the AP’s reporting, to warn against the “illegal decommissioning” of the Ocean Observatories Initiative.    The OOI is a network of 900 sensors anchored off Oregon, Washington, Alaska, North Carolina and in the North Atlantic. For more than a decade, the instruments have transmitted real-time data that has helped detect coastal flooding events, manage sustainable fisheries, track marine heat waves and more.  A memo from the NSF posted last month said the “major descoping” is already underway for the array of instruments managed by Oregon State University, with the removal of most of the rest of the network expected to be completed next summer.   Sen. Merkley joins us to discuss his and other Democratic lawmakers’ efforts to protect the OOI, along with other federal issues affecting his Oregon constituents.    

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

House Democrats on the Oversight Committee are seeking testimony from three private investigators—Paul Lavery, Stephen Kiraly, and William Riley—who allegedly removed a significant amount of material from Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home before law enforcement executed a search in 2005. According to letters sent by the committee, lawmakers want detailed accounts of what was taken, how it was handled, and where it is now, raising concerns that potentially critical evidence may have been diverted or hidden before authorities could access it.Lawmakers say it is “incredibly troubling” that Epstein's computers, hard drives, and other materials may have been in private hands rather than secured by law enforcement, potentially limiting what investigators—and now Congress—have been able to review. The committee has requested the preservation and production of all related materials, including digital storage, financial records, communications, and any documentation showing the chain of custody, as part of a broader effort to understand whether key evidence was effectively shielded during the early stages of the Epstein investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:House Oversight panel seeks testimony from private investigators who removed evidence from Epstein's home - ABC NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

FCPS Superintendent Demetrus Liggins is placed on paid administrative leave after a confusing couple of days, Gov. Beshear says the gas tax will likely return for all Kentucky communities, data centers are being debated in more Kentucky cities, how high school students are learning about career opportunities during the summer, and U.S. Rep. McGarvey goes 4/4 in the Congressional baseball game.

Primaries to lock in candidates in the November elections begin June 18. Primary Election Day is now Aug. 4, 2026.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 14, 1777, the Continental Congress approved the design of a national flag for the newly created United States of America. In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson issued a presidential proclamation establishing a national Flag Day on June 14, with Congressional legislation designating that date as Flag Day — signed into law by President Harry Truman in 1949. Check out the YouTube version of this episode at https://youtu.be/64WqoHykcjc which has accompanying visuals including maps, charts, timelines, photos, illustrations, and diagrams. PragerU podcast available at https://amzn.to/3MRvsz0 PragerU books at https://amzn.to/3APDaWN Flag Day books available at https://amzn.to/4xzPEuT Books about Pledge of Allegiance at https://amzn.to/4uA5Ucu 9/11 books at https://amzn.to/4vGP8cy ENJOY Ad-Free content, Bonus episodes, and Extra materials when joining our growing community on https://patreon.com/markvinet SUPPORT this channel by purchasing any product on Amazon using this FREE entry LINK https://amzn.to/3POlrUD (Amazon gives us credit at NO extra charge to you). Mark Vinet's TIMELINE video channel: https://youtube.com/c/TIMELINE_MarkVinet Mark's HISTORICAL JESUS podcast: https://parthenonpodcast.com/historical-jesus Mark's History of North America podcast: www.parthenonpodcast.com/history-of-north-america Website: https://markvinet.com/podcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mark.vinet.9 X (twitter): https://twitter.com/MarkVinet_HNA & https://twitter.com/HistoricalJesu Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/denarynovels Mark's books: https://amzn.to/3k8qrGM Audio credits: PragerU - American Flag Cork Board (Craftory, 14june2022). All audio excerpts reproduced under the Fair Use (Fair Dealings) Legal Doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, teaching, education, scholarship, research and news reporting.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Should the United States end foreign aid to Israel?In this powerful Pulse of Israel interview, Congressman Stutzman explains why he has introduced a groundbreaking resolution in Congress to phase out U.S. foreign aid to Israel and replace it with a new model based on trade, strategic partnership, joint development projects, and mutual national interests.For decades, the U.S.-Israel relationship has been framed around aid packages. Congressman Stutzman argues that it is time to move beyond the outdated donor-recipient model and strengthen the alliance as a true partnership between two sovereign nations. Instead of foreign aid, he proposes expanding economic cooperation, technological innovation, defense collaboration, and bilateral investment that benefits both Americans and Israelis.This interview is especially significant because the idea did not emerge overnight. More than a year ago, Avi Abelow as part of our Yes! Israel project, together with Israeli Knesset Member Amit Halevi, began presenting the "Aid to Trade" concept in meetings with members of Congress and U.S. Senators in Washington DC. The goal was simple: strengthen the U.S.-Israel strategic alliance while removing the stigma that Israel is dependent on American handouts.Congressman Stutzman has also participated in Yes! Israel Project missions to Israel, where he witnessed firsthand the security challenges facing the Jewish state and the importance of a strong U.S.-Israel partnership based on shared values and common interests.Topics discussed include:• Ending U.S. foreign aid to Israel• The future of the U.S.-Israel alliance• Aid-to-trade proposals• Strategic cooperation between America and Israel• Defense and technology partnerships• Congressional support for Israel• Israel's economic and military strength• Middle East security challenges• Conservative foreign policy perspectivesWhat do you think? Should the U.S.-Israel relationship move from foreign aid to strategic partnership and trade?Join Our Whatsapp Channel: https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkavRznXy731nxxRyptCMvFollow us on Twitter: https://x.com/AviAbelowJoin our Telegram Channel: https://t.me/aviabelowpulseFollow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pulse_of_israel/?hl=enPulse of Israel on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/IsraelVideoNetworkVisit Our Website - https://pulseofisrael.com/Donate to Pulse of Israel: https://pulseofisrael.com/boost-this-video/

Welcome to Last Call, a look at the biggest stories Jim and Greg covered over the past week on the 3 Martini Lunch.This week they discuss Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico's reversal on transgender surgeries for minors, a congressional report showing Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz repeatedly failed or refused to stop rampant fraud, Social Security running dry by 2032, and the Congressional Baseball Game.First, Jim and Greg examine the hypocrisy of James Talarico, who now suddenly opposes gender reassignment surgery for minors. In 2023, he argued against a bill that would ban “medical and surgical procedures” for minors with gender dysphoria. They also address recent reports that Talarico dated two of his staffers.Next, they review a House Oversight Committee report that alleges Gov. Walz and his administration ignored repeated warnings from whistleblowers about massive fraud and, in some cases, retaliated against those who raised concerns. Next, they cover the looming threat of the Social Security trust fund running dry by 2032. Despite a national debt of $39 trillion, cuts to entitlements remain deeply unpopular with voters, preventing any political solution. But soon politicians will not have a choice.Finally, they highlight Wednesday's Congressional Baseball Game, and how the media rarely mention the 2017 shooting at a GOP practice that nearly killed Rep. Steve Scalise. Please visit our great sponsors:IncogniTake control of your digital footprint today.  Use code 3ML at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/3ML Noble GoldDownload the free investor kit. No pressure. No obligation. Just the information.  https://noblegoldinvestments.com/3mlFast Growing TreesBetter plants, better growing, and an extra 20% off with code MARTINI at https://FastGrowingTrees.com/Martini for a limited time; terms and conditions may apply.New episodes every weekday. 

Congressional reporter Laura Weiss breaks down her interview with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and what he said about endorsing Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan and the Maine Senate race. This story was featured in The Readback, our weekend digest featuring the best of Punchbowl News this week. Want more in-depth daily coverage from Congress? Subscribe to our free Punchbowl News AM newsletter at punchbowl.news. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Michael Lange - a writer, strategist, and organizer - returned to the show to discuss the major New York City-based congressional primaries to watch in the June 2026 elections, just ahead of the start of early voting (June 13-21) and primary day (June 23). Lange, who writes The Narrative Wars on substack, and host Ben Max discussed Mayor Mamdani's endorsements, DSA's growing electoral efforts, and other interesting themes of the primaries, as well as specifics in the Democratic races in New York's 13th, 7th, 10th, and 12th House districts. They also touched on the State Comptroller primary, and more. (Ep 592)

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

THE POLITICS OF FIRE  Fires in Utah in full swing this week Tooele County, multiple fires, arson arrest SLC Capitol Hill Fire - State says started by homeless, City says they don't know Mike Lee ignites controversy after adding roadless rule repeal to a wildfire bill 13-year-old girl dies at Pineview after dead tree falls: Would Pineview Reservoir be safer if it were a state park? Not US Forest Service land   Pentagon Classification of Latter-day Saints   Election Day 11 days out - Drama between campaigns ramps up   PAC cash flowing into Congressional races   Trevor Lee Race - voters get video text describing fraud allegations   Senator Dan McCay sends out mailer with endorsement from Senator John Curtis - Curtis said he is neutral on the race    Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, warned states involved in Colorado River disputes could lose access to remaining federal conservation funding if they pursue litigation over water rights.   SLC Council picks new member with a coin flip    SLC, Salt Lake County sue DHS over planned Detention Center   House GOP Vice Chair Blake Moore will host the annual NRCC summer meeting in Utah this weekend

OA1269 - It's official: Donald Trump has nominated Acting Attorney General “Two Taint” Todd Blanche to run the Department of Justice for real. We review Blanche's three-year career as Trump's personal defense attorney before considering the questions the Senate Judiciary Committee should be asking to determine just who Blanche has been really working for in his time at DOJ so far. Then: the U.S. is hosting the world's biggest international sports event at a time when our immigration system has never been less hospitable, and even before the first World Cup kickoff Trump's CBP has been giving red cards to players, coaches, support staff, and fans who had  already been cleared by the refs at U.S. consulates abroad. Matt explains the immigration law logistics of international tournaments, and how this administration's harsh immigration policies are actively working against the system's efforts to make things easier for World Cup visitors. Finally, in this week's listener-requested footnote: why an outdoor sportswear brand is reluctantly suing a drag queen, and our predictions for one of the strangest trademark lawsuits in U.S. history. “Trump Trial Opening Statements (Defendant),” Gavel Gavel (11/1/2024) “People v. Trump 5-28,” Gavel Gavel (12/1/2024) “The Ghislaine Maxwell Interview was Institutional Corruption Like We've Never Seen Before. Truly,” Opening Arguments (8/26/2025)(Youtube version) Acting AG Todd Blanche's Congressional testimony on 6/2/2026 “CPAC 2026 ‘Fireside Chat' with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche,” Youtube (3/26/2026) “Dai Dai (Official Video),” Shakira & Burna Boy Complaint in Patagonia, Inc v. Entrepreneur Enterprises, Inc. dba Pattie Gonia Productions and Wyn Wiley (1/21/2026) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

Congressional races across the state are heating up: with the gloves coming off in the Democratic primary for Colorado's newest, and swingiest, district; other longtime Colorado Democrats facing challenges from more progressive candidates; and a Republican freshman trying to defend his seat from his right flank.CPR's Bente Birkeland and Caitlyn Kim, along with Kiara DeMare and Rae Solomon, discuss who's on the ballot, as well as the dynamics of these races and what it says about politics right now.Catch up with our latest coverage: CPR News: 2026 Colorado Primary Election Voter Guide CPR News: A new season of the Who's Gonna Govern podcast CPR News: Melat Kiros says she'll bring change, lower costs in bid for Congressional District 1 seat CPR News: Rep. Diana DeGette is focused on healthcare in bid for 30th year in Congress  CPR News: Wanda James brings military experience to Congressional District 1 campaign as war in Iran rages Denverite: Denver congressional candidate Wanda James sues other CU Regents over censure CPR News: What voters in Colorado's newest and most competitive congressional district are thinking about right now Purplish is produced by CPR News and the Capitol News Alliance, a collaboration between KUNC News, Colorado Public Radio, Rocky Mountain PBS, and The Colorado Sun, and shared with Rocky Mountain Community Radio and other news organizations across the state. Startup funding for the Alliance was provided, in part, by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.Purplish's producer is Stephanie Wolf. Sound design and engineering by Shane Rumsey. The theme music is by Brad Turner. Other music in this episode is courtesy of Blue Dot Sessions. Megan Verlee is CPR News' executive producer of podcasts.

**Found: How the Trump Administration Rescued 146,000 Migrant Children Abandoned by Biden's Border Policies** In this explosive segment, the hosts review a striking announcement from Senator Markwayne Mullin and the Department of Homeland Security regarding a massive operation to locate unaccompanied migrant children. According to congressional whistleblowers and current investigations, the Biden administration allegedly lost track of up to 450,000 children, many of whom were systematically handed over to cartel gang members posing as family members. The monologue highlights the grim realities discovered on the ground, particularly within sanctuary cities, where law enforcement agencies like ICE, HSI, and CBP have successfully located 146,000 children so far. The commentary slams the previous administration's decision to cancel border DNA testing contracts—which previously served as a crucial defense against human traffickers—and zeroes in on shocking congressional testimony revealing that a designated emergency helpline for these children received 65,000 unanswered calls because it was staffed by only a single person. Contrastingly, the host targets corporate media distractions, arguing that while partisan critics lobbed baseless accusations at Donald Trump, a real, systemic humanitarian disaster was actively ignored under their noses. Markwayne Mullin, Department of Homeland Security, Migrant children, Human trafficking, Border security, Sanctuary cities, ICE, CBP, Congressional testimony, DNA testing, Jeffrey Epstein, Political commentary

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

Join CCL's Sr. Director of Field Operations Elli Sparks for a training that specifically addresses how to prepare yourself for a successful meeting with a member of Congress. You will learn about CCL's methodology, research tips, available tools, lobby meeting roles and parts, the value of practice, and the power of listening. Skip ahead to the following section(s): (0:00) Intro & Agenda (1:29) Purpose of Citizen Lobbyist (5:55) Building Relationships (18:52) Lobby Team Roles (24:52) Meeting Outline Presentation Slides: https://cclusa.org/prepare-to-lobby   Training Page: https://community.citizensclimate.org/events/item/24/21052  Log Your Training:  https://community.citizensclimate.org/log_training?sf_id=a5y8X0000005xWOQAY  

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen told Congress that she was not a willing architect of Jeffrey Epstein's operation but one of his victims, claiming Epstein groomed, abused, isolated, and controlled her for years. She described herself as trapped inside his world through sexual, psychological, and emotional coercion, and said Epstein continued to exert power over her even while he was incarcerated. That testimony matters because Kellen has long been one of the most controversial names in the Epstein case: she was not some distant acquaintance or occasional employee, but a close assistant whose name appeared in the non-prosecution agreement and whose alleged role has been described by survivors as central to the scheduling, travel, and logistics that made Epstein's abuse machine function.The skeptical read is that Kellen's testimony may explain parts of her relationship with Epstein, but it does not automatically erase the serious questions about what she did, what she knew, and how long she remained embedded in his operation. Being abused by Epstein and enabling Epstein's access to other victims are not mutually exclusive possibilities, and that is the uncomfortable center of the issue. Her testimony shifts the frame from co-conspirator to coerced participant, but Congress and the public still have to weigh that against the survivor accounts, the documented logistics, the years of proximity, and the fact that Epstein's criminal enterprise required trusted people to keep the appointments, movements, and access points running. In plain terms, Kellen may have been victimized by Epstein, but that does not settle the question of whether she also helped him victimize others.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:2026-05-21 Sarah Kellen - Transcript.pdf - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, Tom Bevan, Richard Porter and Carolina Lumetta discuss the House GOP's failure to pass the FISA extension, Trump's comment that he "loves the inflation," and the press's preview of the UFC "Claw" on the South Lawn of the White House.  Then, Tom Bevan, Richard Porter and Emily Jashinsky discuss the CEO of ActBlue taking the 5th Amendment 21 times in yesterday's House testimony. We also discuss the new excerpt from Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan's new book on the Trump administration featuring the crisis over its handling of the Epstein Files. In the final block, Tom Bevan, Richard Porter and Emily Jashinsky discuss the start of the World Cup, the GOP's 6th straight win in the Congressional baseball.  This episode is a must-listen for anyone wanting to understand the current political climate as we approach the midterms.   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Marc Cox Morning Show brings you everything St. Louis needs to know this Friday morning — and it is a packed house. A bombshell source tells Dan Buck that St. Louis County Executive Sam Page — facing two felonies and two misdemeanors — may hand in his resignation today as part of a plea deal, and good riddance. A Six Flags Skyscreamer malfunction left four people — including two children — dangling 150 feet in the air for two and a half hours. Senator Eric Schmidt's diving catch at the Congressional baseball game made ESPN's Top 10. And the St. Louis murder rate is on pace to blow past 150 kills before year's end — and the city barely blinks. The St. Louis Morning Brief on the Marc Cox Morning Show — because somebody has to tell you what's really happening in your own backyard. Hashtags: #MarcCoxMorningShow #DanBuck #KimStOnge #StLouisMorningBrief #SamPage #StLouisCounty #SixFlags #Skyscreamer #EricSchmidt #StLouisCrime #MurderRate #StLouis #ConservativeRadio #PatriotRadio #MorningShow #TGIF #STL

Welcome to the latest episode of Lunch with Shelley with our superstar special guest Congresswoman Elise Stefanik.  Elise proudly represents New York's 21st District and is the most senior elected Republican in New York. She is also the author of the number one best seller “Poisoned Ivies",  which is an incredible read that I highly recommend! Elise made history as the youngest woman ever elected to Congress, and she is the youngest woman in history to serve in top elected House leadership, as well as the highest-ranking woman in Congress in her role as House Republican Conference Chair.  She also serves as a senior Member of the House Armed Services Committee, the Committee on Education and the Workforce, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and she was a founding Member of the China Task Force. Elise is widely recognized as one of the most effective questioners in Congressional hearings, most notably when she set off a global reckoning addressing antisemitism in higher education. Her questions to Ivy League university presidents forced multiple resignations and set the record for the most viewed Congressional testimony in history, with billions of views worldwide. Because of this strong moral leadership and her extensive policy record, Elise Stefanik is an internationally recognized leader in combating antisemitism. Join us at the delicious and healthy Ama restaurant in the Navy Yard as we discuss how Elise became interested in politics, her run for Congress, her experiences as an undergrad at Harvard, the infamous hearing watched around the world, what she does to relax, what might be next for her in her career, and much much more! Check us out at www.lunchwithshelley.com or wherever you get your favorite podcast, and in the meantime Peace, Love and Lunch!

Back in 2025, the Department of Justice issued a legal opinion stating that presidents may have authority not only to create but also to revoke national monuments established by prior presidents. So what does this mean for protections for national monuments and public lands like the Grand Staircase and Bears Ears National Monument? On this Lawyer 2 Lawyer episode, Craig welcomes professor of law, Mark Squillace from the University of Colorado Law School, as they spotlight national monuments, public lands, and presidential power. Craig & Mark discuss the DOJ's legal opinion on national monuments, monument and public land protections, Congressional authority, the Antiquities Act of 1906, conservation law, and federal land management. Subscribe to Lawyer 2 Lawyer: https://play.megaphone.fm/6kyeqlhety25kgmgqdr7cw Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Colorado Rep. Jason Crow (D) sits down with Jake Sherman and Anna Palmer to break down FISA, his work on the Intelligence and Armed Services committees and much more! Stick around: NOTUS' Daniella Diaz and our own Anthony Adragna stop by for townhouse fun! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Knock Down the House is a 2019 American documentary film directed by Rachel Lears.[1] It revolves around the 2018 congressional primary campaigns of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Amy Vilela, Cori Bush and Paula Jean Swearengin, four progressive Democrats endorsed by Justice Democrats and Brand New Congress who ran in that year's midterm elections.[2][3] The film had its world premiere at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival on January 27, 2019.[4][5] It was released on May 1, 2019, by Netflix[6] and received acclaim from critics.SynopsisThe film follows four female Democrats who decided to run for Congress in the 2018 United States elections: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Amy Vilela of Nevada, Cori Bush of Missouri, and Paula Jean Swearengin of West Virginia. The film charts their campaigns in their respective Democratic primaries. The four candidates each run grassroots campaigns against long-time incumbents.[7] Vilela, Bush, and Swearengin lost their primary elections, but Ocasio-Cortez won her primary and went on to win the general election.However, two years later in 2020, during the next Congressional election cycle, Bush went on to win her primary and the general election in Missouri's 1st congressional district. Swearengin was the Democratic nominee for West Virginia's Senate race, where she lost to the incumbent by over 40 points. Four years later in 2024, Bush also lost renomination.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

There was an era in Oregon politics where moderate Republicans were very influential. One of them was Bob Packwood. Packwood died last week and he leaves a very messy legacy. On this week’s episode of OPB Politics Now, reporters Lauren Dake, Dirk VanderHart and special guest Jeff Mapes talk about Packwood’s political history and his downfall, which was one of the more stunning scandals in Congressional history. Find the show wherever you get your podcasts.

Pam Bondi's congressional transcript showed her trying to defend the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files while repeatedly distancing herself from the day-to-day mechanics of the review. She told House Oversight lawmakers that Todd Blanche was the official “in charge” of the Epstein records process, saying she did not personally conduct the document review and that the work had been delegated to him. Bondi acknowledged that mistakes were made, including redaction problems, but framed the release as a massive and difficult undertaking rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct transparency. At the same time, she insisted the department was committed to accountability, even as lawmakers pressed her on why the disclosures remained incomplete, flawed, or slow-moving.The transcript also showed Bondi trying to avoid directly blaming Blanche while making clear that he was the person managing the release. She praised him as ethical and capable, but Democrats seized on her answers as evidence that Blanche, along with other DOJ and FBI officials, should be brought before Congress to explain the process in detail. Bondi also said she learned about Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer from news reports, denied involvement in that decision, rejected the idea of a Maxwell pardon, and refused to discuss private conversations with Donald Trump. The result was a transcript that did not settle the Epstein files controversy, but instead widened the accountability fight by making clear that Congress still does not have a clean answer on who controlled the review, why errors happened, and whether the public has truly received the full record.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Final-Bondi-Transcript.pdf

On today's podcast, Executive Editor Natalie Orpett speaks with Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson about what Congress can do to direct the president to end the war in Iran. Scott's recent article in Lawfare, “What Congressional Resolutions Mean for the War in Iran,” explained why a likely presidential veto of a War Powers Resolution is not the end of the story. The War Powers Resolution gives Congress other tools—including some procedural tricks—that could have a meaningful influence on ending the war. They talk about Scott's article, why he thinks a concurrent resolution is the best option, and how congressional action may be more than just political messaging—it could have real legal significance.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

-Congressional hearings provide plenty of ammunition when Rob highlights allegations involving the Southern Poverty Law Center, joking that some of the testimony sounds less like an anti-extremism organization and more like the world's most dysfunctional networking event for white supremacists. -Brig. Gen. Blaine Holt: Blaine Holt joins Rob for an expansive discussion on Iran, national security, military technology, and domestic threats. Holt argues that Iran's regime is weakened, isolated, and nearing a breaking point, while warning that the U.S. must remain vigilant against potential terror threats at home. Today's podcast is sponsored by : RELIEF FACTOR - You don't need to live with aches & pains! Reduce muscle & joint inflammation and live a pain-free life by visiting http://ReliefFactor.com  GHOSTBED - I used to think a mattress was just furniture, until I got my GhostBed! GhostBed is offering my audience their lowest prices of the season, plus an extra 10% off. Go to http://GhostBed.com/CARSON and use promo code CARSON BIRCH GOLD - Protect and grow your retirement savings with gold. Text ROB to 98 98 98 for your FREE information kit! To call in and speak with Rob Carson live on the show, dial 1-800-922-6680 between the hours of 12 Noon and 3:00 pm Eastern Time Monday through Friday… Musical parodies provided by Jim Gossett (http://patreon.com/JimGossettComedy) You can now WATCH and chat with The Rob Carson Show LIVE on Newsmax's social media channels (Facebook, X/Twitter, YouTube, Rumble) Listen to Newsmax LIVE and see our entire podcast lineup at http://Newsmax.com/Listen Make the switch to NEWSMAX today! Get your 15 day free trial of NEWSMAX+ at http://NewsmaxPlus.com Looking for NEWSMAX caps, tees, mugs & more? Check out the Newsmax merchandise shop at : http://nws.mx/shop Follow NEWSMAX on Social Media:  -Facebook: http://nws.mx/FB  -X/Twitter: http://nws.mx/twitter -Instagram: http://nws.mx/IG -YouTube: https://youtube.com/NewsmaxTV -Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/NewsmaxTV -TRUTH Social: https://truthsocial.com/@NEWSMAX -GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/newsmax -Threads: http://threads.net/@NEWSMAX  -Telegram: http://t.me/newsmax  -BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/newsmax.com -Parler: http://app.parler.com/newsmax Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We start with President Donald Trump's latest threat against Iran as strikes from both sides test peace deal. Congressional investigators zero in on Bill Gates' relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. We have an update on a months-long fight over ICE and border patrol funding. Federal agents are searching the site of a chemical tank crisis. Plus, a controversial vote on churches with women pastors. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A verdict is imminent in the Karmelo Anthony trial, and outrage has hit critical mass. Is there any chance the accused teen killer walks free or faces significantly lessened charges? Will examines the most recent developments in the case and see where public opinion currently lies. Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) then breaks down the true extent of the fraud within the H1-B Visa program and previews his role pitching in the upcoming Congressional baseball game.Plus, Host of ‘The Kirk Cameron Show,' Kirk Cameron joins Will to discuss his efforts to restore patriotism to America's youth through his latest book, ‘Built by the Brave.'Subscribe to ‘Will Cain Country' on YouTube here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Watch Will Cain Country!⁠⁠⁠Follow ‘Will Cain Country' on X (⁠⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠⁠), Instagram (⁠⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠⁠), TikTok (⁠⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠⁠), and Facebook (⁠⁠⁠@WillCainNews)Follow Will on X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices