Podcasts about property rights

Bunkered down in the war room somewhere in the high desert of southern Idaho where I discuss all things firearms and self defense training... call us text us 620-794-6223 email us at info@patriotdefense13.com  like us on FB and check out our web page patriotdefense13.com Facebook Instagram Youtube TikTok

X: @KeithJKrach @ileaderssummit @americasrt1776 @NatashaSrdoc @JoelAnandUSA @supertalk @JTitMVirginia Join America's Roundtable radio co-hosts Natasha Srdoc and Joel Anand Samy with Keith Krach, CEO of Freedom 250, the national, nonpartisan initiative commemorating America's 250th anniversary launched by President Trump. He is also Chairman and Co-Founder of the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue, where he works at the intersection of technology, national security, and diplomacy. Before taking on these leadership roles, Keith Krach built an extraordinary career in the private sector. He served as Chairman and CEO of DocuSign and co-founded Ariba, where he served as Chairman and CEO, helping build companies that transformed how businesses operate and conduct commerce. Earlier in his career, he became the youngest-ever Vice President of General Motors. His career then took him to Washington D.C., where he served as U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment from 2019 to 2021. In that role, he led initiatives focused on economic security, trusted technology, resilient supply chains, and international partnerships. Today, Keith Krach brings that unique combination of business leadership, technological expertise, diplomatic experience, and civic engagement to one of the most significant national milestones of our time: America's 250th anniversary. The conversation focuses on the following topics: Reflecting on America's 250th anniversary and affirming key principles for a brighter future with freedom, trust and the courage to take risks. At the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue - Keith's efforts to advance technology diplomacy and help leaders understand how critical and emerging technologies shape national security, economic prosperity, and democratic values. Its work includes education, policy engagement, global convenings, and trusted technology partnerships. Served in President Trump's first administration as U.S. Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment from 2019 to 2021 and led economic-security initiatives focused on trusted technology, supply-chain resilience, strategic technology sectors, and cooperation among democratic partners. Led the State Department team behind the Clean Network, which began with 5G and expanded to other critical technology domains. Advanced U.S.-Taiwan economic and technology cooperation and emphasized the strategic importance of trusted semiconductor supply chains. A conversation on China's ambitions as a rival to America and the importance of strengthening US national security. americasrt.com https://ileaderssummit.org/ | https://jerusalemleaderssummit.com/ America's Roundtable on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/americas-roundtable/id1518878472 X: @KeithJKrach @ileaderssummit @americasrt1776 @NatashaSrdoc @JoelAnandUSA @supertalk @JTitMVirginia America's Roundtable is co-hosted by Natasha Srdoc and Joel Anand Samy, co-founders of International Leaders Summit and the Jerusalem Leaders Summit. America's Roundtable radio program focuses on America's economy, healthcare reform, rule of law, security and trade, and its strategic partnership with rule of law nations around the world. The radio program features high-ranking US administration officials, cabinet members, members of Congress, state government officials, distinguished diplomats, business and media leaders and influential thinkers from around the world. Tune into America's Roundtable Radio program from Washington, DC via live streaming on Saturday mornings via 68 radio stations at 7:30 A.M. (ET) on Lanser Broadcasting Corporation covering the Michigan and the Midwest market, and at 7:30 A.M. (CT) on SuperTalk Mississippi — SuperTalk.FM reaching listeners in every county within the State of Mississippi, and neighboring states in the South including Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee. Tune into WTON in Central Virginia on Sunday mornings at 9:30 A.M. (ET). Listen to America's Roundtable on digital platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon, Google and other key online platforms. Listen live, Saturdays at 7:30 A.M. (CT) on SuperTalk | https://www.supertalk.fm

Some conservatives are using the same fear-based logic they condemned during COVID—only now the target is AI data centers.Legitimate concerns about water, power, land and infrastructure deserve scrutiny. But when fear becomes the excuse for government control, liberty is at risk.Different fear. Same authoritarian reflex. #Conservatism #ArtificialIntelligence #DataCenters #Liberty #GovernmentOverreach #TheRightSide #FYPSupport the show

Capitalism—and a strong profit motivation—has driven enterprise for centuries. Two notable examples are the East India Company and the US transcontinental railroad, and the various tycoons who built it. In neither case, by today's standards, were the operations fair or ethical on a number of fronts. Can we do better in space? Dr. Rainer Zitelmann joins us to discuss capitalism and the importance of extraterrestrial land ownership as an enabler of human expansion off-Earth. He's got a lot to say, and not all of it is what you might expect. Join us for this fascinating and informative look at one business case for newspace. Headlines: • NASA's Roman Space Telescope Launches to Explore Cosmic Mysteries • SpaceX Falcon Heavy Returns to Action for Major NASA Mission • Blue Origin Selected to Build Mars Communications Relay for NASA • Japan and Europe's BepiColombo Mission Arrives at Mercury Main Topic: Who Owns the Moon? — Capitalism in Space With Dr. Rainer Zitelmann • Dr. Zitelmann Explains Market Forces Transforming the Space Industry • Historical Parallels Between Economic Reforms and the Privatization of Space • The Outer Space Treaty and Legal Uncertainty Around Private Ownership Off-Earth • Potential for Stock Markets and REITs for Off-World Real Estate and Resources • China's Rapid Advancement in Private Space and Market-Driven Innovation • Safety Zones, Artemis Accords, and the Limits of Current Legal Frameworks • First-Mover Advantage: How Initial Claims Might Play Out on the Moon and Mars • Equity, Envy, and Ethical Debates Over Colonization and Space Ownership • The Role of Commercial Incentive Versus Public Benefit in Expanding Humanity's Reach Get "New Space Capitalism" (Amazon Affiliate Link): https://amzn.to/4xEeGID Hosts: Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik Guest: Dr. Rainer Zitelmann Download or subscribe to This Week in Space at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-space. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: outsystems.com/twit helixsleep.com/space

Capitalism—and a strong profit motivation—has driven enterprise for centuries. Two notable examples are the East India Company and the US transcontinental railroad, and the various tycoons who built it. In neither case, by today's standards, were the operations fair or ethical on a number of fronts. Can we do better in space? Dr. Rainer Zitelmann joins us to discuss capitalism and the importance of extraterrestrial land ownership as an enabler of human expansion off-Earth. He's got a lot to say, and not all of it is what you might expect. Join us for this fascinating and informative look at one business case for newspace. Headlines: • NASA's Roman Space Telescope Launches to Explore Cosmic Mysteries • SpaceX Falcon Heavy Returns to Action for Major NASA Mission • Blue Origin Selected to Build Mars Communications Relay for NASA • Japan and Europe's BepiColombo Mission Arrives at Mercury Main Topic: Who Owns the Moon? — Capitalism in Space With Dr. Rainer Zitelmann • Dr. Zitelmann Explains Market Forces Transforming the Space Industry • Historical Parallels Between Economic Reforms and the Privatization of Space • The Outer Space Treaty and Legal Uncertainty Around Private Ownership Off-Earth • Potential for Stock Markets and REITs for Off-World Real Estate and Resources • China's Rapid Advancement in Private Space and Market-Driven Innovation • Safety Zones, Artemis Accords, and the Limits of Current Legal Frameworks • First-Mover Advantage: How Initial Claims Might Play Out on the Moon and Mars • Equity, Envy, and Ethical Debates Over Colonization and Space Ownership • The Role of Commercial Incentive Versus Public Benefit in Expanding Humanity's Reach Get "New Space Capitalism" (Amazon Affiliate Link): https://amzn.to/4xEeGID Hosts: Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik Guest: Dr. Rainer Zitelmann Download or subscribe to This Week in Space at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-space. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: outsystems.com/twit helixsleep.com/space

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A priest shows up. Antony doesn't confess, James doesn't convert, but they all talk about human dignity.Checkout Fr. James Martin, SJ 's book, 'Work in Progress.'https://www.amazon.com/dp/00626944800:00 Introduction and Overview0:29 The Ultimate Quiet Quitting Story4:32 Scott Bessent's $950 Billion Bond Buyback Plan8:05 Is the Treasury Conducting Its Own Monetary Policy?12:14 Foolishness of the Week: American Airlines Does It Again16:57 Father James Martin on Pope Leo, AI, and Human Dignity20:50 What Happens When AI Meets Humanlike Robots?22:48 AI, Loneliness, and Replacing Human Relationships24:57 Can Free Markets Serve the Common Good?29:22 Property Rights, Poverty, and the Role of the Church34:53 Who Gets to Define the “Common Good”?36:17 Subsidiarity, Data Centers, and Local Decision-Making41:18 Human Rights vs. Human Flourishing43:38 Wealth, Profit, and the Morality of Capitalism48:00 What Did Jesus Mean by “The Poor Will Always Be With You”?51:22 Individual Charity vs. Community Responsibility55:15 Social Media, Human Dignity, and the Loss of Community1:00:09 Father James Martin's Work in Progress

Point Reyes National Seashore sits on a foggy peninsula about an hour north of San Francisco. It is a place of trails, wildlife, and dramatic coastal scenery. What many visitors don't expect to find there are dairy farms. And yet for well over a century, family ranches have been part of this landscape, some operated by the same families for five or six generations. That coexistence has been at the heart of one of the most contentious disputes in the history of the American national park system. In January 2025, after years of litigation and closed-door negotiation, a settlement was reached: most of the ranching operations at Point Reyes would close, and the families that ran them would leave. As of April 2026, twelve ranches have departed and two remain. Depending on who you ask, this is either a long-overdue victory for wildlife and ecological restoration, or the deeply unjust displacement of a community that had been told for decades it had a future in the park. The tule elk are free to roam. The ranchers are mostly gone. The debate about what it all means is very much ongoing. In this episode, historian Laura Alice Watt, author of The Paradox of Preservation, traces the arc of this conflict from the park's founding through the Drakes Bay Oyster Company controversy and into the battle over the ranches. Her book offers a window into how the National Park Service and the Nation Parks in the United States work, and what the story of Point Reyes reveals about the contradictions of American conservation.

Property Rights in Agriculture Deciding on Final Irrigation Timing Keeping Track of Cattle Records   00:01:05 – Property Rights in Agriculture: Roger McEowen, K-State and Washburn law professor, starts the show as he talks about cases that involve farm property rights and what producers can learn from other cases.  Property Rights on the Farm Roger on AgManager.info   00:12:05 – Deciding on Final Irrigation Timing: K-State Extension agronomist, Tina Sullivan, continues today's show discussing final irrigation for crops and what water things need to be considered when making the decision. Final Irrigation of the Growing Season - Timing is Everything   00:23:05 – Keeping Track of Cattle Records: Part of the Beef Cattle Institute's Cattle Chat podcast wraps the show as Brad White, Bob Larson, Dustin Pendell and Rylee Blomenkamp explain what records they encourage cattle producers to keep track of.  BCI Cattle Chat Podcast Bovine Science with BCI Podcast Email BCI at bci@ksu.edu     Send comments, questions or requests for copies of past programs to ksrenews@ksu.edu.   Agriculture Today is a daily program featuring Kansas State University agricultural specialists and other experts examining ag issues facing Kansas and the nation. It is hosted by Shelby Varner and distributed to radio stations throughout Kansas and as a daily podcast.   K‑State Extension is a short name for the Kansas State University Cooperative Extension Service, a program designed to generate and distribute useful knowledge for the well‑being of Kansans. Supported by county, state, federal and private funds, the program has county Extension offices statewide. Its headquarters is on the K‑State campus in Manhattan. For more information, visit Extension.ksu.edu. K-State Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Artificial intelligence is moving software creation out of the gatekeepers' hands and into everyday life. Austin shows how vibe coding can build websites, automate work, create images, and even turn an idea into a physical object. Camellia Peterson joins to debate marijuana smoke, neighbors, nuisance rules, and where one person's freedom collides with another person's property rights. Jon Miltimore examines J.D. Vance's invocation of Huey Long, the rise of economic populism, wealth redistribution, inflation, federal spending, and Washington's shrinking appetite for reform. Follow Wake Up America on Apple Podcasts or Spotify so every new episode lands in your feed. Watch the full video.

A vacant property can become a nightmare when squatters use a fraudulent lease to claim tenancy. This video explores property damage, police inaction, forcible detainer, and practical steps landlords can take to protect their units.

Todd examines the case of gestational surrogate McKenna West, who refused an abortion after the unborn child was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. He considers the conflict among contractual obligations, bodily autonomy, parental authority, medical care, and the right to life, arguing that the child's birth exposes the moral stakes hidden by abstract abortion arguments. Todd then contrasts free-market capitalism with socialism, focusing on ownership, consent, coercion, and whether a political majority can justly claim the product of another person's labor.

Todd examines the case of gestational surrogate McKenna West, who refused an abortion after the unborn child was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. He considers the conflict among contractual obligations, bodily autonomy, parental authority, medical care, and the right to life, arguing that the child's birth exposes the moral stakes hidden by abstract abortion arguments. Todd then contrasts free-market capitalism with socialism, focusing on ownership, consent, coercion, and whether a political majority can justly claim the product of another person's labor.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What if the Industrial Revolution wasn't sparked by the steam engine, but by a quiet legal revolution in how England handled property rights? Ben Southwood of Works in Progress argues that the Glorious Revolution of the 1680s unleashed British growth by empowering a Parliament composed of landowners who simplified their own tangled, inefficient property rights. Through thousands of case-by-case acts, they freed up land for investment, consolidated inefficient farm ownership, and enabled a boom in privately-built roads, canals, and navigable rivers that created national markets. Along the way you'll learn why roads once moved at 1.5 miles per hour, and how these centuries-old lessons about buying off holdouts might solve today's housing and infrastructure gridlock.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 496. Matt Sands of the Nations of Sanity project and I discuss the possible interrelationship between his project and my The Universal Principles of Liberty. Recorded Aug. 14, 2026. https://youtu.be/ET2ucqFU7Ak?si=VVcdipDX-umElPxR Related The Universal Principles of Liberty  Supplemental Principles | Kinsella's Annotations and Commentary KOL442 | Together Strong Debate vs. Walter Block on Voluntary Slavery (Matthew Sands of Nations of Sanity) Fusillo on the Universal Principles of Liberty and Liberland Libertarian Nation and Related Projects Liberland KOL480 | The Liberland Constitution and Libertarian Principles (Liberland Prague, 2025) The Voluntaryist Constitution Liberland Constitution Christmas Party Prague 2025 See also draft Liberland Constitution, Art. I, §1, ¶¶3, 4: The Universal Principles of Liberty, adopted on 14 August 2025 and as they stand on the date of adoption of this Constitution, are hereby incorporated by reference and may be consulted for interpretive and suppletive purposes, to the extent that they are not incompatible with the provisions of this Constitution. Any further amendment to the Universal Principles of Liberty shall have no force within Liberland unless adopted as an amendment to this Constitution in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. Note: In the discussion we disagree on whether the standard of proof in a normal property dispute should be preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt. In subsequent offline discussion I sent the following comments to Matt (edited): Thinking more about the preponderance of the evidence issue we discussed. See for example this tweet about a property owner using force to eject someone who is a trespasser: always causing problems pic.twitter.com/mdecFjVTnW — Wolverine land (@Breaking57) August 15, 2026 Note: the property owner didn't have to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that they own the store to have the cops threaten force to eject him. Just like you don't have to "prove" "beyond a reasonable doubt" that you own your car, or your body, or are "not an aggressor," to have a right to use force against a trespasser/aggressor: someone attempting to use, alter the physical integrity of, or invade the borders of, your body or other resources that you own in accordance with principles of original appropriation and contractual transfer. Having rights, per se, has nothing to do with proof or standards. It's an if-then thing: if you have certain justified rights of exclusive control to certain resources, then you are justified in using force against the body or other resources possessed or owned by an aggressor. This general statement is not a statement about trials or proof in such fora. It's a statement about justifiable action. To return to one example I gave: if A and B claim grandpa's house (say, from his will), then if you use preponderance to award it to A, then later A can use that property claim to use force to prevent B from entering. Even that use of defensive force does not require any "proof." It is just the right of the owner. Matters of proof only apply in some later forum addressing the actions taken and seeking to recognize certain property rights claims or order punishment of a malfeasor. You have to keep in mind that things like the "right" to jury trial, due process, presumption of innocence, the exclusionary rule, beyond a reasonable doubt—none of these are actual rights. They are just "rights" that accompany being part of a political community: civil or political rights, not natural rights. They are just limits we want placed on powerful actors like the state. So, by arguing for employing the BRD standard in any forum determining ownership of a contested resource based on the general libertarian principles of self-ownership, original appropriation, contract, and rectification, you are importing standards that really meant as limits on the state's power, into how property rights are determined, applied, recognized, and enforced. There is simply no reason to do this. These things are not really even related. Property rights emerge as normative support for natural aspects of action such as control of one's body and homesteading and trading of external scarce resources. See On Property Rights in Superabundant Bananas and Property Rights as Normative Support for Possession. These principles have nothing to do with the state: only with (a) human action, praxeology, economics (descriptive); and (b) society and human interaction: norms, rights (normative). It is possible to have, and to imagine, any of the following, without a state invovled: (a) isolated Robinsonades, with human action and praxeology only (and personal, but not interpersonal, morals); (b) a non-normative society with trade and interaction, both cooperative and conflictual, a might-makes-right society; (c) a stateless normative society laws and rights that provide normative support for the natural aspects of action such as control of one's body and homesteading and trading of external scarce resources (and this society can be either pre-catallactic, or employ money). You can also have (d) something like (c) but with a state that undermines the normative role of private law and rights and is instead a sort of hybrid between (b) and (c). And when you have a state that assumes the power to create and enforce law including imposing punishment or sanctions on people for violating the state's criminal law, the state's claim of authority is usually cloaked in a variety of coverings that masque or even pretend to or maybe do blunt its nature. In other words, the balance between the state and its power and the populace it governs hinges on the great fiction of the state which is maintained by propaganda, by the state giving at least lip service to some obligations and duties that it has, some limits on its power, such as heeding the due process and other political or civil rights of its subjects; this can be done organically, as in Britain's unwritten "constitution," or in a written constitution such as the US Constitution that claims to authorize and limit a new state. The limits can be implied or stated as limits on power: such as in the enumerated powers structure of the constitution itself, (( See, e.g., Thomas B. McAffee, “Federalism and the Protection of Rights: The Modern Ninth Amendment's Spreading Confusion [2],” Brigham Young University Law Review 1996, no. 2 (1996): 351–388 (arguing that the framers regarded the Constitution's limited/enumerated powers scheme itself as a primary structural guarantor of popular rights, and that the Ninth Amendment was designed to preserve that federal structure against the risk that enumerating specific rights would be misread as creating a government of general powers limited only by the listed rights); idem, “The Bill of Rights, Social Contract Theory, and the Rights ‘Retained' by the People,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 16 (1992): 267–305  (arguing that the “other rights retained by the people” under the Ninth Amendment are those secured residually by the Constitution's grant of only limited, enumerated powers to the national government, so that the amendment protects the original limited-powers design rather than authorizing judicial enforcement of unenumerated natural rights outside the written Constitution). )) or in statements about that the government may not do, or in "rights" such as those in the Bill of Rights that also limit federal government power. But such rights are not always real rights. (( By "real rights," as I am not speaking to a civil law audience, I do not mean what the civil law means, which is property rights pertaining to a "thing," a "res" (droits réels, derechos reales, iura in re), rights enforceable against the whole world (erga omnes)—as opposed to personal rights (droits personnels, iura in personam), rights against a specific person (typically arising from obligations/contracts) (which I object to in my theory of contracts; see The Title-Transfer Theory of Contract; KOL495 | “Rothbard's Revolutionary Contract Theory,” Sociedad de la Libertad Latam (Peru): Rothbard 100: A Legacy for Future Generations). Instead I mean actual or legitimate rights, those recognized by libertarianism. )) If you wanted to limit federal power and prevent it from regulating normal crimes like murder and leave that demesne to the states, you could (attempt to) set up a government of enumerated and limited powers and just omit that power from the list. You could add something like the Tenth Amendment to emphasize the point that was already implied. This does not mean citizens have the right to commit murder, only that the fedgov has no jurisdiction over this. (( See my similar jurisdictional argument in KOL443 | Abortion: A Radically Decentralist Approach (PFS 2024). I argue that the external legal system has no jurisdiction over abortion, even if it is "murder"; it is governed by the mother's legal system itself. )) For other rights, actual rights like the right to bear arms or free speech, you could again protect this right from federal encroachment in multiple ways: you limit congress's power to regulate these activities by denying them a grant of power in an enumerated and limited powers scheme constitution; or you add a Bill of Rights limiting federal power; or both, for "great caution" as Madison said: The exceptions here or elsewhere in the Constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people, or as to enlarge the powers delegated by the Constitution; but either as actual limitations of such powers, or as inserted merely for greater caution. You could also limit the state by requiring it to respect "fake" "rights" of the citizens, like "due process,...

The hypocrisy is real!

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., the landmark decision that paved the way for ubiquitous zoning and land-use regulation by local governments across America. Under Euclid, where the Court infamously analogized an apartment building in the midst of single-family houses to “a pig in a parlor,” cities and towns could permissibly divide and regulate land by its use under their police power as they saw fit, so long as the zoning rules were reasonably related to protecting public health, safety, welfare, or morals. But even though the Court — just two years after Euclid in Nectow v. City of Cambridge — struck down a zoning ordinance because it failed to “bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare," local governments persisted in passing, and courts continued to routinely uphold, racially-discriminatory zoning laws under Euclid under the guise of protecting public welfare and economic well-being. Despite Euclid’s age and the dismantling of race-based zoning, Euclid remains the center of attention and debate, especially regarding whether zoning regulation unduly infringes upon private property rights, and therefore, demands higher and more thorough judicial scrutiny. Join our panel of experts for a lively discussion reflecting on Euclid’s effects on land use and housing over the past century and what the future may hold. Featuring: Robert Thomas, Director of Property Rights Litigation, Pacific Legal Foundation Prof. Michael Allan Wolf, Richard E. Nelson Eminent Scholar Chair in Local Government Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law (Moderator) Isaiah McKinney, Judicial Law Clerk, U.S. District Court

You paid off your home, but do you actually own it—or are you paying the government a lifetime subscription? State Representative Ryan Chamberlain joins Charisse Rivers to debate the true cost of Florida’s property tax system, exposing how escalating taxes act like an undisclosed second mortgage on everyday homeowners. We pull back the curtain on government budgets to analyze whether proposals like shifting to sales tax or tapping tourism revenue can truly deliver tax relief without sacrificing critical local services. Listen in to uncover the plain truth about tax policy, government accountability, and what it really takes to secure your home. Like this episode? Hit that Follow button and never miss an episode!

Who decides who can carry a firearm on your property and under what conditions? Does the Second Amendment presume permission or restriction? According to the Hawaiian legislature, they decide who carries and presumes restriction.

Imagine a nation where, for the residents, land is for the claiming. You walk down the street, pick out a nice looking plot of land, and just plop down a marker. No rent, no taxes, no deed – just free land. That's the communal system of property rights that governed a small Caribbean island for over a century.This week on our Summer School World Tour we make port on the small economies of island nations, a great place to explore how different experiments play out. Every small change – the good and the bad – has big consequences.First, the fascinating test case on the island of Barbuda, where the people there have found a way to run things without the usual, formal land rights.Then, we consider the vulnerabilities of small nations as we dig into a mysterious sand heist in Jamaica. A stolen beach – yes, you read that right – and something called “sand forensics” reveal the importance of this seemingly infinite resource and the challenges of protecting public spaces when there's money to be made.Along the way we found ourselves asking: Does property have to be private? What happens when it's not? How can you protect scarce resources when they're part of the vast, public spaces everyone shares?Featured Episodes:The Island No One Owns (2020)Peak Sand (2018)Featured Terms:Tragedy of the commonsProperty rightsPath dependenceOwnership in commonSupport:NPR+ (sponsor-free listening & bonus episodes) And please click “follow” in your podcast app so you don't miss an episode. Read: Our book: Planet Money: A Guide to the Economic Forces That Shape Your Life (Audiobook here) Our weekly longform Planet Money newsletterOur weekly Indicator link round-up newsletterFollow: InstagramTikTokYouTubeFacebookThis episode of Planet Money Summer School is hosted by Robert Smith. It was produced by Sophia Paliza-Carre and edited by Planet Money Executive Producer Alex Goldmark. It was fact-checked by Leyla Doss and engineered by Annlie Huang.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Pets are part of everyday life for millions of renters, but managing them fairly and consistently has become one of the biggest challenges in rental housing. In this episode of Sharkpreneur, Seth Greene interviews John R. Bradford III, Founder and CEO of PetScreening, who explains how his property management experience led him to build PetScreening as a more consistent way to manage pet policies in rental housing. He discusses how the platform helps property managers assess pet-related risk, support property owners, and set clearer expectations for pet-owning residents. He also explores broader trends in pet-inclusive housing, property rights, regulatory changes, category creation, and PetScreening's social mission through Fido Alert. Key Takeaways:→ Property managers need clear systems because pets can pose risks, liabilities, and policy challenges. → The FIDO Score helps evaluate both the pet and the owner.→ PetScreening helps property managers enforce their own rules rather than telling them what their policies should be. → PetScreening has helped housing providers rethink blanket breed restrictions.→ Creating a new software category requires persistence, education, and continuous innovation. John R. Bradford III is the Founder and CEO of PetScreening, which he launched in 2017 with a vision to promote pet inclusivity across all areas of life. Driven by his belief that breeds such as pit bulls, German shepherds, and Rottweilers should not be judged solely on breed, John sought to create a platform that provides landlords, property managers, and businesses with data-driven insights to make informed, pet-friendly decisions. His mission is simple yet powerful: to make the world more pet-inclusive, no matter where people live, work, play, or stay. Connect With John:Website: https://www.petscreening.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-r-bradford-iii-b519184/

Learn about a New York farmer's costly property dispute with squatters to Harrison Ford's real-life rescue 25 years ago and a simple travel tip for staying connected without cell service that even the kids will love. Join radio hosts Rebecca Wanner aka ‘BEC' and Jeff ‘Tigger' Erhardt (Tigger & BEC) with the latest in Outdoors & Western Lifestyle News! Farmer Says Neighbor Claimed Part of His Cornfield Through "Squatter's Rights" A New York farmer is fighting to reclaim part of his cornfield after a neighbor claimed ownership through a legal process known as adverse possession, often called "squatter's rights." A little back history,the parcel in the case is a 300-acre farm that was leased by the brothers in the 1970s up until 2009, when the landlord offered to sell the ground. They purchased the property, continuing to farm the ground. Directly adjacent to the 300-acre farm sat a private residence—an older, but well-maintained house on a 2.5-acre lot. The house was fronted by a highway and surrounded on three sides by Hoskins' newly-acquired farmland. Stan Hoskins, 79, says what started as a small garden crossing onto his property gradually expanded over the years. According to Hoskins, the neighbor added a fence, a greenhouse, and several maple trees, eventually taking over about 60 feet of the field. The man the Hoskins purchased the farm had property line disputes with the owners of this house, according to Hoskins. When they went from being a tenant to being an owner, the property line dispute became ours. The Hoskins thought basic reason and decency would solve things, but were dead wrong. Instead they walked into a wall of entitlement. When Hoskins asked the neighbor to remove the structures in 2024, the neighbor argued the land now belonged  to him under adverse possession laws. Those laws can allow someone to gain ownership of property if they openly use it for a certain period of time and meet specific legal requirements, which vary by state. The dispute has led to an expensive court battle. Hoskins says he has spent about $75,000 in legal fees trying to recover the land. He even offered a compromise that would allow the garden to remain temporarily while preventing future ownership claims, but the offer was rejected. The case is scheduled to go before a judge in late July 2026. Hoskins hopes his experience serves as a warning to other landowners. His advice: don't ignore small property line disputes, because they can grow into costly legal battles over time. Reference: https://www.agweb.com/news/business/farmland/farmer-fights-squatters-rights-after-neighbor-takes-chunk-cornfield 25-Year Flashback: When Harrison Ford Rescued a Lost Boy Scout It's hard to believe but this July we celebrate 25 years ago when actor Harrison Ford saved a missing 13-year-old boy scout, Cody Clawson, in Yellowstone National Park as a Volunteer Rescue Pilot. If you remember, the teen had become separated from his troop, spending the night in a cave. The next morning the boy scout used his belt buckle to reflect sunlight into the sky, catching the attention of Harrison Ford, an avid helicopter pilot, landed - picking up the teen and safely flew him back to his troop. The year before in 2020, Harrison Ford had assisted another rescue. This time a climber who suffered from altitude sickness climbing the Table Mountain in Idaho Falls, Idaho. During that rescue Ford helped the hiker into his helicopter, then flew to an area hospital. Can you imagine Indiana Jones or Hans Solo actually saving you?! Summer Tip Trip: Don't Count on Cell Service Ever find yourself visiting high trafficked areas only to be in zero cell service? For example, a recent tourist in Yellowstone when driving up to one of the popular locations. The husband, thanks to walkie talkies, would pull up and drop off the family, always taking along a walkie talkie. Once parked they were able to meet up easily via directions on the walkie.  Another use for walkie talkies? Use on cruise ships when cell service plans don't cover while at sea or if you don't want to spend the extra money for an internet plan. OUTDOORS FIELD REPORTS & COMMENTS We want to hear from you! If you have any questions, comments, or stories to share about bighorn sheep, outdoor adventures, or wildlife conservation, don't hesitate to reach out. Call or text us at 305-900-BEND (305-900-2363), or send an email to BendRadioShow@gmail.com. Stay connected by following us on social media at Facebook/Instagram @thebendshow or by subscribing to The Bend Show on YouTube. Visit our website at TheBendShow.com for more exciting content and updates! https://thebendshow.com/ https://www.facebook.com/thebendshow WESTERN LIFESTYLE & THE OUTDOORS Jeff ‘Tigger' Erhardt & Rebecca ‘BEC' Wanner are passionate news broadcasters who represent the working ranch world, rodeo, and the Western way of life. They are also staunch advocates for the outdoors and wildlife conservation. As outdoorsmen themselves, Tigger and BEC provide valuable insight and education to hunters, adventurers, ranchers, and anyone interested in agriculture and conservation. With a shared love for the outdoors, Tigger & BEC are committed to bringing high-quality beef and wild game from the field to your table. They understand the importance of sharing meals with family, cooking the fruits of your labor, and making memories in the great outdoors. Through their work, they aim to educate and inspire those who appreciate God's Country and life on the land. United by a common mission, Tigger & BEC offer a glimpse into life beyond the beaten path and down dirt roads. They're here to share knowledge, answer your questions, and join you in your own success story. Adventure awaits around the bend. With The Outdoors, the Western Heritage, Rural America, and Wildlife Conservation at the forefront, Tigger and BEC live this lifestyle every day. To learn more about Tigger & BEC's journey and their passion for the outdoors, visit TiggerandBEC.com.  

While the democratic socialists are claiming to just want a society like they have in Denmark, their real aims are the seizure of all or most private property and especially private capital.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-democratic-socialists-want-soviet-style-control-capital

While the democratic socialists are claiming to just want a society like they have in Denmark, their real aims are the seizure of all or most private property and especially private capital.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/yes-democratic-socialists-want-soviet-style-control-capital

Guest Segment: Franz Borghardt on Drones, Property Rights, and the Law Drone Takedown Legality: Borghardt explores whether homeowners can legally shoot down a drone hovering over their property, noting firearm use risks violating state and federal airspace laws. Curtilage vs. Altitude: Higher-altitude drones flying lawfully are legally similar to commercial jets passing overhead, but low-altitude drones actively surveying or recording property raise real privacy concerns. Layered Regulation: Drone law spans FAA federal guidelines, state statutes, and a growing patchwork of city ordinances, plus apps that show where flying is legally permitted. Law Enforcement Drone Conflicts: When police use a warranted drone to surveil a property, destroying it likely won't trigger property-damage charges, paralleling precedent on removing warranted GPS trackers. Amazon Delivery Drone Concerns: Delivery drones raise noise and surveillance complaints from uninvolved neighbors along the flight path who never consented to being recorded or having data monetized. Drone Impersonation Crime: The hosts discuss whether criminals could disguise drones as commercial ones (like Amazon) to commit theft, surveillance, or industrial espionage undetected. Advanced Sensing Tech Risk: Ground-penetrating radar (used to study pyramid substructures) could theoretically be miniaturized for drones to see through walls, raising serious future privacy and security threats. Emerging Child Safety Angle: Borghardt predicts espionage-focused drone laws will eventually expand to address predators using drone-mounted cameras to surveil homes and children, not just corporate targets.

Why did so many American colonials take arms against the ruling British, even when the odds were stacked against them? Dr. Wanjiru Njoya looks into the competing ideological claims that go with analyzing the American Revolution.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/ideology-behind-american-revolution

Why did so many American colonials take arms against the ruling British, even when the odds were stacked against them? Dr. Wanjiru Njoya looks into the competing ideological claims that go with analyzing the American Revolution.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/ideology-behind-american-revolution

Send us Fan Mail

Contrary to age-old prejudices, the wealth of the rich is not the cause of the poverty of the poor, but helps to alleviate that poverty. No matter whether it is their intention or not, almost anything that the rich can legally do tends to help the poor.

Campaign donation limits look strict. Super PACs can make those limits feel almost meaningless. James Harrigan and Antony Davies join Josh Martens to debate who really controls American elections: donors, politicians, parties, or voters. How much does it cost to win a House or Senate seat? The Words and Numbers hosts explain individual contribution limits, candidate committees, political action committees, independent expenditures, and the unlimited spending available through super PACs. The conversation examines campaign finance, political incentives, the Thomas Massie race, outside spending, foreign influence, publicly funded elections, mandatory voting, gerrymandering, the Republican and Democratic duopoly, and the direct election of senators. The uncomfortable conclusion might be that campaign money is only a symptom. When government has enough power to sell favors, people will spend enormous amounts trying to control it. https://x.com/antonydavies https://x.com/JamesRHarrigan https://wordsandnumbers.org/ Chapters 00:00 James Harrigan and Antony Davies Join GML 02:00 The Thomas Massie Race and Outside Spending 03:30 What American Elections Really Cost 05:45 Campaign Money, Speech, and Property Rights 07:15 Are Voters Responsible for Selling Their Votes? 10:15 Unlimited Government and the Rise of Oligarchy 13:00 Donation Limits and the Super PAC Loophole 18:15 Political Spoils, Corporations, and Union Money 22:45 Libertarians Debate Public Election Funding 27:30 The Massie Race and Foreign Influence 31:15 Stupid Voters, Mandatory Voting, and the Party Duopoly 42:00 One Change That Could Fix American Elections Links Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Join GML: https://joingml.com [Martens Minute]: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ All links @ gml.bio.link Subscribe to Good Morning Liberty, like the video, and tell us who deserves more blame: donors, politicians, or voters. Share this conversation with someone who thinks contribution limits solved campaign finance. Please also leave GML a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rural Route: Local Control, Property Rights, and Standing Up for Rural Communities This week on Rural Route, Trent Loos is joined by Shane Eaton from Terry, Montana, for an in-depth discussion on the growing tensions between local governments, landowners, and corporate interests. Shane explains…

Send us Fan MailWhat if we've been asking the wrong question about America's housing crisis?Congress has passed one of the most significant housing bills in decades, with the stated goal of making housing more affordable by encouraging more construction, higher-density development, and changes to local zoning policies. But is building more homes really the solution?In this episode of Dishin' Dirt, I take a non-political, fact-based look at what the legislation actually does, how it could influence local communities, and why every homeowner, REALTOR®, builder, and buyer should understand the issues.Topics include:What is actually in the new federal housing billWhy zoning has traditionally been controlled by local governmentsHow federal incentives could influence future developmentThe debate over higher-density housing and neighborhood characterInfrastructure, traffic, schools, and who pays for growthDoes South Carolina really have a housing shortage?Are housing shortages different in the South than in the Northeast and West Coast?Why builders across South Carolina are offering incentives, rate buydowns, and price reductionsThe difference between a housing shortage and a homeownership affordability crisisThe one question every policymaker, REALTOR®, and homeowner should be askingWhether you support the legislation or have concerns about its long-term impact, this episode is designed to educate—not advocate. I will explore both sides of the debate while challenging listeners to think critically about the future of housing, property rights, local control, and the American Dream of homeownership.What do you think?Does South Carolina actually have a housing shortage?Should zoning decisions remain local, or should the federal government play a larger role in encouraging housing development?And most importantly...Have we confused a housing shortage with a homeownership crisis?Share your thoughts in the comments—we'd love to hear from you.

Key Takeaways: Understand Market Emotions: Markets often move between fear and greed. Learning to recognize these emotional cycles can help you make better investment decisions instead of reacting to the crowd. Bitcoin as an Alternative Financial System: Some investors view Bitcoin as a more predictable financial system than traditional currencies because it follows fixed rules and has a limited supply. Stay Emotionally Balanced: Habits like meditation, journaling, and walking can help you stay calm during market swings, making it easier to think clearly and avoid emotional decisions. Use Tools to Stay Objective: Valuation tools and market indicators can help you understand when emotions may be driving prices, allowing you to make more thoughtful investment choices. Clear Communication Leads to Better Decisions: The way we talk about money shapes how we think about it. Using clear, simple language makes it easier to understand complex financial ideas and build sound investment strategies.   Chapters: Timestamp Summary 0:00 Mastering Emotional Cycles for Successful Investing 2:15 Bitcoin and Property Rights as Universal Attractors of Wealth 4:51 Expanding Wealth Beyond Political Divisions 5:53 The Impact of Currency Devaluation on Investment and Society 9:45 Understanding Fear and Greed in Insurance and Bitcoin Markets 13:17 Understanding Human Instincts and Emotional Regulation in Investing 17:08 Balancing Market Volatility and Social Media's Negative Influence 22:52 Balancing Financial Anxiety with Mindfulness and Empathy 28:10 Balancing Inner Peace and the Beast Within   Powered by Stone Hill Wealth Management   Social Media Handles    Follow Phillip Washington, Jr. on Instagram (@askphillip)   Subscribe to Wealth Building Made Simple newsletter https://www.wealthbuildingmadesimple.us/   Ready to turn your investing dreams into reality? Our "Wealth Building Made Simple" premium newsletter is your secret weapon. We break down investing in a way that's easy to understand, even if you're just starting out. Learn the tricks the wealthy use, discover exciting opportunities, and start building the future YOU want. Sign up now, and let's make those dreams happen!   WBMS Premium Subscription   Phillip Washington, Jr. is a registered investment adviser. Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies. Investments involve risk and, unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 494. This is my interview by Alex Buxeda of at Schweizer Monat [Swiss Monthly; linktree]; recorded June 22, 2026. Youtube shownotes: Stephan Kinsella, patent attorney, legal theorist, and one of the leading critics of intellectual property sits with Alex Buxeda to explore whether ideas can be owned. Starting from first principles, they discuss why Kinsella argues that patents and copyrights are incompatible with property rights, the role of scarcity in economics, innovation without intellectual property, pharmaceutical patents, entrepreneurship, pricing, and the philosophical foundations of ownership. Grok summary: We discussed why intellectual property is fundamentally incompatible with genuine property rights. Stephan Kinsella argued that patents and copyrights are not legitimate property but state-granted monopolies that violate real ownership of scarce, physical resources. He explained that ideas and knowledge are non-scarce and non-rivalrous — one person's use does not prevent another's — so enforcing IP requires aggression against others' tangible property. We explored the flaws in common justifications for patents (especially in pharmaceuticals), the arbitrary nature of IP law, the myth that “creation” grants ownership, and how free competition and open knowledge flows drive far more innovation than government-protected monopolies. Kinsella also addressed the ethics of piracy, the distorting effects of the FDA and tariffs, and why emerging technologies like 3D printing and AI will increasingly undermine IP systems. https://youtu.be/Q4SD8pmpv1U?si=gtx2KN2CcsAbIl5s Related links/publications (Grok assist) For further discussion of the issues raised in this conversation, see the following resources by Stephan Kinsella, grouped by topic: Core Case Against IP & Property Rights Fundamentals Against Intellectual Property (2001/2008) — Kinsella's foundational monograph making the case that patents and copyrights are incompatible with libertarian property rights based on scarcity and homesteading. The Problem with Intellectual Property (2025) — A comprehensive recent paper arguing that IP rights are unjust state-granted monopolies that violate legitimate property rights in scarce resources. Against Intellectual Property After Twenty Years: Looking Back and Looking Forward (2022) — Updated reflections on the original arguments, addressing common objections and developments since 2001. Intellectual Property Rights as Negative Servitudes (2011) — Argues that IP functions as non-consensual negative servitudes on others' physical property, violating true property rights. Another Way to Explain the Problem with IP: Resources v. Knowledge; Ownership v. Possession (2017) — Clear distinction between scarce resources (subject to ownership) and non-scarce knowledge/ideas. The Prior-Later Distinction (2026) — Clarifies the foundational role of first-use (prior appropriation) in property rights theory. Structural Unity of Real and Intellectual Property? (2025) — Examines (and rejects) attempts to unify real and intellectual property conceptually. Scarcity, Ideas, Labor Theory & Creationism Critiques Ideas are Free: The Case Against Intellectual Property (2010) — Explains why ideas and knowledge are non-scarce and why libertarians were mistaken in supporting IP. Libertarian Lockean Creationism (2025) — Critique of the mistaken “creation” theory of property rights often used to defend IP. Locke's Big Mistake: How the Labor Theory of Property Ruined Political Theory Locke's Big Mistake (Transcript) (2013) Hume on Intellectual Property and the Problematic Labor Metaphor (2011) On the Danger of Metaphors in Scientific Discourse (2011) Objectivist Law Prof Mossoff on Copyright; or, the Misuse of Labor, Value, and Creation Metaphors (2008) How We Come to Own Ourselves (2006) — Explains self-ownership and original appropriation, central to why IP conflicts with libertarian property theory. Superabundant Bananas & Property Rights as Normative Support for Possession (2025) — Further clarification on scarcity, superabundance, and the nature of property rights. Pharmaceuticals, FDA & Market Distortions Patents and Pharmaceuticals (2023) Are Patents Needed to Make Up for FDA Kneecapping? (2011) FDA and Patent Reform: A Modest Proposal (2023) Milton Friedman on the Distorting Effect of Patents (2011) Drug Reimportation (2009) — Discussion of reimportation, free trade, and how patents distort pharmaceutical pricing. Tabarrok: Patent Policy on the Back of a Napkin (2012) — Critique of simplistic patent policy arguments. KOL469 | Tabarrok on Patents, Price Controls, and Drug Reimportation Practical & Reform Topics Do Business Without Intellectual Property (2014) How to Improve Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Law (2011) The American Invents Act and Patent Reform (2011) IP Law and Market Failure (2022) Intellectual Nonsense: Fallacious Arguments for IP (2012/2021) — Critique of common fallacious pro-IP arguments. Copyright Absurdities & Other Examples Libraries Prepare to Burn Foreign Books, Courtesy Copyright Law (2011) — Striking example of the absurd real-world effects of copyright enforcement. Historical Libertarian & Objectivist Views on IP Rothbard and the Galambosians (2005) — Discussion of extreme pro-IP views within libertarian circles and Rothbard's perspective. The Galambosians Strike Back (2015) Around This Time I Met the Galambosian (2013) Rand Chose IP: Death Over Life (2025) — Critique of Ayn Rand's strong support for IP. IP: The Objectivists Strike Back (2009) — Response to Objectivist defenses of IP. Why Objectivists Hate Anarchy (2009) — Broader context on Objectivist-libertarian tensions, including IP. Purpose of Law, Schizophrenic State & Broader Theory The Purpose of Law: Justice and Property Rights (2026) The Schizophrenic State (2006) — Classic piece on the contradictory nature of state actions regarding monopolies and competition. Foundational Libertarian Theory Legal Foundations of a Free Society (2023) Disentangling Legal and Economic Concepts (2025) The Title-Transfer Theory of Contract (2024) A Libertarian Theory of Contract (2003) What Libertarianism Is (2009) Recent Audio/Lectures KOL489 | The Problem with Intellectual Property (Audio) (2026) KOL483 | The Economics and Ethics of Intellectual Property (2026) KOL491 | Trying to Persuade Paul Cwik of the Case Against IP KOL253 | Berkeley Fed Soc: Libertarian's Case Against IP KOL469 | Tabarrok on Patents, Price Controls, and Drug Reimportation These resources expand on the core themes of scarcity versus ideas, negative servitudes, pharmaceutical patent issues, market distortions, FDA interactions, practical business strategies, Locke's labor theory mistakes, contract theory, self-ownership, metaphors in discourse, Objectivist views on IP, the purpose of law, and libertarian first principles discussed in the interview. Shownotes (Grok) Podcast Shownotes Episode Title: Stephan Kinsella: Why Intellectual Property is Incompatible with Property Rights Guest: Stephan Kinsella (retired patent attorney & libertarian legal theorist) Host: Alex Buxeda Episode Summary Stephan Kinsella delivers a rigorous, first-principles critique of patents and copyright. He argues that IP is not property at all, but a government-granted monopoly that violates genuine property rights in scarce resources. Drawing on Austrian economics and libertarian ethics, he explains why ideas are non-scarce, why IP slows innovation, and why free markets and competition are superior engines of progress. A clear, uncompromising defense of abolishing intellectual property. Total Runtime: ~1 hour 22 minutes Key Topics & Timestamps 0:00 – Introduction and Practical Market Realities Kinsella begins by noting that entrepreneurs can use strategies like loss leaders and price discrimination, but cartels and monopolies are hard to sustain due to competition and cheating — setting the stage for his deeper critique of state-enforced monopolies like IP. 1:00 – Kinsella's Journey from Pro-IP to Abolitionist As a former patent attorney and lifelong libertarian, Kinsella originally accepted Ayn Rand's defense of IP. After deep study while practicing patent law, he concluded that IP is literally unjustifiable and incompatible with property rights. This realization forced him to refine his understanding of libertarian property theory, relying more heavily on Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe. 4:22 – Core Argument: Scarcity, Property Rights, and Why Ideas Are Not Property Property rights exist solely to resolve conflicts over scarce, rivalrous resources. Ideas and knowledge are non-scarce — one person's use does not prevent another's simultaneous use. Granting IP rights therefore requires using force against others' legitimate physical property (factories, printers, materials), creating artificial conflict rather than resolving it. IP is not ownership of information; it is a negative servitude on real property. 14:55 – The Pharmaceutical Patent Defense and Why It Fails Kinsella directly refutes the claim that expensive R&D requires patents. High drug costs stem primarily from FDA regulation, not invention. Patents create monopoly pricing and slow knowledge diffusion, which is the true source of long-term progress. He criticizes utilitarian “market failure” arguments, arbitrary patent terms, and the state's schizophrenic approach (granting monopolies via patents while attacking monopolies via antitrust). Free markets naturally reward first movers with temporary profits before competition drives prices down. 31:45 – Arbitrariness of IP and the Myth of “Creation” as a Source of Rights Patent and copyright durations are completely arbitrary....

In Pung v. Isabella County, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected claims under the Takings Clause and Excessive Fines Clause that the Constitution required compensation based on the property’s fair-market value, holding instead that surplus auction proceeds are the proper measure when the tax sale is fairly conducted. The decision preserves traditional tax-sale systems while leaving room for future challenges to unfair foreclosure procedures.Join us for a webinar breaking down the decision and its impact.Featuring:Prof. Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason UniversityDeborah J. La Fetra, Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

In this interview with Mario Nawfal, Saifedean presents the Misesian case against Israel, and argues the only way to understand the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is that it is the result of the denial of property rights for Palestinians based purely on their not belonging to the ruling ethnoreligious group. Join Crowdhealth: https://www.joincrowdhealth.com/

Send us Fan MailBIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE:  The information in this episode comes from Red Flags Press.  Their main web site is very useful for research purposes, and I recommend it!We follow the idea of the “social parasite” through socialist writing and show how it shifts from moral accusation to an enforceable legal category once society claims ownership over individual labor. We argue that the transaction costs of monitoring effort and assigning “socially useful” work push real-world socialism toward surveillance, coercion, and punishment.• socialist critique of wage labor as work or starve• transaction costs as defining, monitoring, and enforcing property rights• the property rights switch from self-ownership to society owning labor• “from each according to their ability” as an obligation backed by force• socialist writers labeling middlemen and many professions as parasites• the party as the decision-maker when prices are suppressed• Joseph Brodsky's trial as a real anti-parasite enforcement example• why the parasite problem expands and becomes politically arbitrary• how similar labor-claim logic shows up in authoritarian socialism and fascism• why Scandinavian social democracy is capitalism, not classical socialismThe book of the week is Lenin's What Is to Be Done? Burning Questions of Our Moment, and I strongly recommend it.Links:Red Flags, "Why Socialism Says Slacking is Theft."Moments in Soviet History: The Trial of Joseph BrodskyLeo Huberman, The ABCs of Socialism."Soviet Era 'Parasites'" https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2016/05/20/soviet-era-parasites-return-to-todays-russian-a52934If you have questions or comments, or want to suggest a future topic, email the show at taitc.email@gmail.com !You can follow Mike Munger on Twitter at @mungowitz 

TakeawaysToby Doeden opposes any attempt to repeal HB 1052 and has promised the fastest veto in South Dakota history if a repeal ever reaches his desk as governor.On the question of a compromise threshold for eminent domain projects, Doeden is firm: when it comes to God-given constitutional rights, there is no wiggle room and no compromise.Doeden believes true economic development in South Dakota doesn't require multi-billion dollar subsidized projects. It comes from supporting local entrepreneurs, small businesses, farmers, and ranchers.Coming off a first-place finish in the June 2nd Republican primary with 31% of the vote in a four-way race, Toby Doeden sits down with Amanda Radke for a direct, issue-focused conversation on the property rights topics South Dakota landowners care about most.This is Part 1 of American Land and Legacy's two-part exclusive interview series ahead of the July 28th runoff election, where Doeden will face Interim Governor Larry Rhoden. With thousands of landowners reaching out to Amanda asking who to support, she took the question straight to the candidates themselves.The conversation covers the full range of property rights issues at stake in this race: the legacy of SB 201 and the overwhelming voter rejection of RL 21, the landmark HB 1052 that eliminated eminent domain for CO2 pipelines, the ongoing debate over data centers and tax exemptions, and how a Doeden administration would respond to federal pressure to expand eminent domain for energy infrastructure.Doeden is clear on his foundational position: every decision he makes as governor will be rooted in protecting God-given constitutional rights, and he will mirror the will of the people, not the will of lobbyists and big donors. He points to the 59% voter rejection of RL 21 across 65 of 66 counties as proof of where South Dakotans stand, and argues that the legislature's decision to push SB 201 through anyway was a direct failure to represent the people.He also addresses the economy, rural communities, and what he sees as the real differences between himself and his runoff opponent, including a 38% increase in state spending, rising crime, doubled property taxes, and a sales tax increase coming in 2027.Key Topics CoveredThe SB 201 / RL 21 Landowner Bill of Rights: what went wrong and how a Doeden administration would honor the will of South Dakota votersHB 1052 and eminent domain for CO2 pipelines: Doeden's commitment to protecting and defending this nation-leading legislationWhether a compromise threshold for pipeline projects is on the table (short answer: no)The data center debate: the 50-year tax exemption attempt versus the Data Center Bill of Rights for Citizens passed by Senator Carr and Speaker HansenPresident Trump's executive orders expanding eminent domain for energy infrastructure and how Doeden would balance federal direction with South Dakota's states' rightsWhat economic development actually looks like for South Dakota, and why it doesn't require big subsidized projectsThe challenges facing rural communities, small farms, and ranches, and who Doeden would bring to the table to address themHow Doeden's primary results reflect a statewide demand for change, and what he sees as the key differences between his vision and Larry Rhoden's recordReuniting the Republican Party after a competitive four-way primary and what that means going into the runoffhttps://www.americanlandandlegacy.org/

TakeawaysGovernor Rhoden signed HB 1052 and gave a direct, unambiguous answer when asked if he would uphold it against any attempt to amend or repeal it in the upcoming legislative session: yes.Rhoden does not support special tax exemptions or deals for data centers, but he did sign the Data Center Bill of Rights for Citizens carried by Senator Carr and Speaker Hansen, which requires data centers to prove they won't negatively impact South Dakota's water supply or electricity rates.Rhoden points to a decades-long record on property rights, including leading the charge after the 2005 Kelo v. New London Supreme Court decision, carrying the Open Fields Doctrine bill, and resolving the non-meandered bodies of water issue after 20 years of legal limbo.In Part 2 of American Land and Legacy's exclusive gubernatorial candidate interview series, Amanda Radke sits down with South Dakota Governor Larry Rhoden ahead of the July 28th runoff election.With the same questions put to both candidates, this conversation gives landowners a direct side-by-side look at where each man stands on the property rights issues that matter most to South Dakota's farmers, ranchers, and rural communities.Rhoden speaks to his record as a lifelong West River rancher and his history of working on property rights legislation going back two decades, including model legislation he carried in the wake of the Kelo v. New London decision, the Open Fields Doctrine bill he got across the finish line as lieutenant governor, and the resolution of the non-meandered bodies of water issue that had been in limbo for 20 years.On the most pressing current questions, Rhoden is direct: he signed HB 1052, he wouldn't hesitate to do it again, and he will veto any attempt to weaken or repeal it. He does not support special tax exemptions for data centers, though he's open to using existing incentive structures if facilities comply with the rules laid out in the Data Center Bill of Rights he signed. And on the question of federal pressure to expand eminent domain for energy infrastructure, he expresses confidence in the working relationship his administration has built with the Trump team while maintaining that South Dakota's own statutes already offer stronger protections than any other state in the union.The conversation also covers SB 201's complicated legacy, the local control concerns in Section 4 of that bill, the case for and against a constitutional amendment on eminent domain, rural broadband investment, international trade missions, and what Rhoden sees as the key differences between himself and Toby Doeden heading into the runoff.Key Topics CoveredHB 1052 and the compromise threshold discussion during negotiations: why it didn't get support and what Rhoden did when the bill reached his deskData centers: his opposition to special tax exemptions, his support for the Data Center Bill of Rights for Citizens, and how he views existing incentive structuresPresident Trump's executive orders on data centers and expanded eminent domain for energy infrastructure, and how Rhoden plans to navigate federal pressure while protecting South Dakota landownersHis decades-long property rights record: Kelo v. New London model legislation, the Open Fields Doctrine bill, and the non-meandered bodies of water resolutionSB 201 and RL 21: Rhoden's perspective on what the bill actually did, why the referendum process surprised him, and how Summit Carbon's loss of trust with landowners shaped the outcomeSection 4 of SB 201 and the local control concerns around PUC authority versus county and township ordinance-making powerhttps://www.americanlandandlegacy.org/

// GUEST // X: https://x.com/jordanbpeterson Website: https://www.jordanbpeterson.com // SPONSORS // Blockware Solutions: https://mining.blockwaresolutions.com/breedlove Performance Lab Supplements: https://www.performancelab.com/breedlove The Farm at Okefenokee: https://okefarm.com/ // PRODUCTS I ENDORSE // Protect your mobile phone from SIM swap attacks: https://www.efani.com/breedlove Lineage Provisions (use discount code BREEDLOVE): https://lineageprovisions.com/?ref=breedlove_22 Colorado Craft Beef (use discount code BREEDLOVE): https://coloradocraftbeef.com/ Salt of the Earth Electrolytes: http://drinksote.com/breedlove Jawzrsize (code RobertBreedlove for 20% off): https://jawzrsize.com // UNLOCK THE WISDOM OF THE WORLD'S BEST NON-FICTION BOOKS //https://course.breedlove.io/ // SUBSCRIBE TO THE CLIPS CHANNEL //https://www.youtube.com/@robertbreedloveclips2996/videos // TIMESTAMPS // 0:00 – WiM Episode Trailer 1:55 – Podcast Begins 8:00 – Bitcoin and Personal Transformation: Time Preference and Responsibility 15:00 – Money as Index of Value: Austrian Economics and Praxeology 22:00 – Fiat Currency as a Violated Social Contract 24:23 – Mine Bitcoin with Blockware Solutions 25:51 – The Five Properties of Money and Why Gold Won 36:00 – Nixon Shock, the Gold Standard, and the Birth of Fiat 44:00 – Central Banking as a Parasite on the Productive Economy 51:07 – Performance Lab Supplements 52:15 – Bitcoin: Incorruptible Language of Value and Free Speech 1:03:00 – Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Foundation of Civilization 1:15:33 – The Farm at Okefenokee 1:16:34 – Maps of Meaning, Moral Order, and the Bitcoin Standard 1:34:27 – Protect Yourself From SIM Swaps 1:35:33 – Unlock the Wisdom of the Best Non-Fiction Books // PODCAST // Podcast Website: https://whatismoneypodcast.com/ Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-what-is-money-show/id1541404400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/25LPvm8EewBGyfQQ1abIsE RSS Feed: https://feeds.simplecast.com/MLdpYXYI // SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL // Bitcoin: 3D1gfxKZKMtfWaD1bkwiR6JsDzu6e9bZQ7 Sats via Strike: https://strike.me/breedlove22 Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/RBreedlove Venmo: https://account.venmo.com/u/Robert-Breedlove-2 // SOCIAL // Breedlove X: https://x.com/Breedlove22 WiM? X: https://x.com/WhatisMoneyShow Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/breedlove22/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/breedlove_22/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@breedlove22 Substack: https://breedlove22.substack.com/ All My Current Work: https://linktr.ee/robertbreedlove

Economists like Harold Demsetz and Ronald Coase based their property rights views on utilitarianism. Murray Rothbard based his on justice.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/why-justice-mattered-rothbard

Economists like Harold Demsetz and Ronald Coase based their property rights views on utilitarianism. Murray Rothbard based his on justice.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/why-justice-mattered-rothbard

// SPONSORS // Blockware Solutions: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://mining.blockwaresolutions.com/breedlove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Performance Lab Supplements: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.performancelab.com/breedlove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The Farm at Okefenokee: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://okefarm.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   // PRODUCTS I ENDORSE // Protect your mobile phone from SIM swap attacks: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.efani.com/breedlove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Lineage Provisions (use discount code BREEDLOVE): ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://lineageprovisions.com/?ref=breedlove_22⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Colorado Craft Beef (use discount code BREEDLOVE): ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://coloradocraftbeef.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Salt of the Earth Electrolytes: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://drinksote.com/breedlove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Jawzrsize (code RobertBreedlove for 20% off): ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://jawzrsize.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   // UNLOCK THE WISDOM OF THE WORLD'S BEST NON-FICTION BOOKS // ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://course.breedlove.io/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   // SUBSCRIBE TO THE CLIPS CHANNEL // ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/@robertbreedloveclips2996/videos⁠⁠⁠⁠ // TIMESTAMPS // 0:00 – WiM Episode Trailer 1:26 – Episode Begins 6:00 – Money as Optionality, Psycho-Technology, and the Language of Power 14:57 – Mine Bitcoin with Blockware Solutions 16:00 – Money as a Universal Measurement System and Tool of Trade 22:00 – The Dollar as Cognitive Expedience: Why We Think in Fiat 28:00 – Babylonian Money Magic and the Dark Origins of Conjured Currency 32:43 – Performance Lab Supplements 33:50 – Self-Ownership, Property Rights, and the Foundation of Civilization 42:00 – How the Fed and Treasury Run a Debt-Based Circle Jerk 50:00 – Bitcoin: Crystal Clear Signal in a Murky Fiat World 52:50 – The Farm at Okefenokee 53:55 – Sound Money, Scarcity, and the Five Properties of Good Money 1:13:40 – Protect Yourself From SIM Swaps 1:14:46 – Unlock the Wisdom of the Best Non-Fiction Books // PODCAST // Podcast Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://whatismoneypodcast.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Apple Podcast: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-what-is-money-show/id1541404400⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Spotify: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/25LPvm8EewBGyfQQ1abIsE⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ RSS Feed: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://feeds.simplecast.com/MLdpYXYI⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   // SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL // Bitcoin: 3D1gfxKZKMtfWaD1bkwiR6JsDzu6e9bZQ7 Sats via Strike: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://strike.me/breedlove22⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Paypal: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/RBreedlove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Venmo: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://account.venmo.com/u/Robert-Breedlove-2⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠   // SOCIAL // Breedlove X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/Breedlove22⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ WiM? X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/WhatisMoneyShow⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Linkedin: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/breedlove22/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/breedlove_22/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@breedlove22⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Substack: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://breedlove22.substack.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ All My Current Work: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://linktr.ee/robertbreedlove⁠⁠

Not surprisingly, the present government is rapidly politicizing artificial intelligence. We don't have to look far for disastrous results.Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/ai-creative-destruction-and-politicization-economic-change

Saifedean presents the Misesian case against Israel, and argues the only way to understand the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is that it is the result of the denial of property rights for Palestinians based purely on their not belonging to the ruling ethnoreligious group.Full Article: https://saifedean.substack.com/p/property-rights-the-root-cause-ofArticle on X: https://x.com/saifedean/status/1987845360484520258

Western civilization did not invent slavery — it ended it. Western civilization didn't harm countries through colonialism, it helped them. These are hard truths to swallow but they are true. So, why do so many people hate civilization? Let's define civilization, shall we? Let's look at the chief characteristics that a civilization must possess. We shall list them in this episode. Why are Israel and America singled out for hatred and not Sweden, France, and Germany? Why Reform Judaism is more socially acceptable. Any thug, either urban or international, is advantaged by willingness to use violence. In a robust civilized landscape, thugs lose their advantage — naturally, they hate civilization. To join our conversation, come to www.WeHappyWarriors.com. 00:01 Live Event Announcement and Invitation 02:22 Understanding Human Behavior and Politics 04:56 Historical Context of Western Civilization's Criticism 08:44 Colonialism and Its Impact on Western Civilization 11:39 Corruption and the Decline of Western Civilization 15:53 Values of Human Life in Civilization 21:48 Treatment of Women in Civilization 29:36 Technology and Its Role in Civilization 39:56 Form of Government and Property Rights in Civilization 42:52 Marriage and Family in Civilization 45:41 Hostility Towards Civilization and the Bible _____

What Schools Don't Teach You About American Indians Watch this video at- https://youtu.be/mxapaXrHr1Y?si=cF0XXPt02WgEhCLK Matt Walsh 3.41M subscribers 3,192,761 views Apr 2, 2026 #RealHistory #MattWalsh #TheMattWalshShow The Real History of the American Indians What do Snow White, Cinderella, and smallpox blankets have in common? They're all fairytales. In this shocking episode of "Real History," Matt Walsh rips apart the myth of peaceful, noble Indians who were supposedly victimized by evil white settlers. Matt takes on the biggest mainstream myths and left-wing shibboleths about the settling of the American West. It's time to ditch the self-loathing propaganda designed to demoralize us and replace it with raw, unfiltered history that radical academics and Hollywood don't want you to see. Real History Ep. 2 The Real History of Slavery is available on youtube here:    • What Schools Don't Teach You About Slavery   The Real History of the Civil War is available, exclusively on DailyWire+ https://dwplus.watch/RealHistoryTheCi... -- -- -- LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/MattWalsh?sub_con... -- -- -- Today's Sponsors: Balance of Nature - Join hundreds of thousands of customers in one simple routine that's changing the world. Go to https://BalanceofNature.com to subscribe and save today. Grand Canyon University (GCU) - Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University. Visit https://GCU.edu to learn more. -- -- -- CHAPTERS: 00:00 Intro/Trail of Tears Myth 06:57 The "Peaceful Indian" Myth 14:19 Colonization escalated violence? 21:47 Counting Coup, Scalping, & becoming a War Chief 26:16 Indians & Property Rights 30:01 The Fort Parker Massacre 32:50 American Indian War Tactics 41:30 The Rise of Texas Rangers 43:28 Guns that Won the West 46:07 Major Indian Victories 49:55 How the US Finally Won 51:33 The Smallpox Blanket Myth 59:02 It Wasn't a "Genocide" -- -- --