Podcasts about Jury

Lindsay Clancy spent her career as a labor and delivery nurse helping mothers through the most vulnerable moments of their lives. Prosecutors say that same job is proof she knew exactly how to work the people who were supposed to save her. She's charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home on January 24, 2023. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Roughly three months before the killings, prosecutors say she typed something about her older children into her phone, a note a prosecutor later read aloud in court. The Commonwealth's case leans on the mundane: a text at 4:53 saying she didn't feel like cooking, a takeout order at 5:10, her husband out the door at 5:15 for dinner and a pharmacy run, back a little after six. Prosecutors say she measured that window using the exact clinical composure her job trained into her. The defense says she'd been begging that same medical system for help for weeks and was handed prescriptions instead. She's permanently paralyzed after going out a second-story window the night her children died. If convicted of first-degree murder, Massachusetts law gives the judge no discretion: mandatory life without parole. If she's found not criminally responsible, she's committed to a locked state psychiatric hospital instead, not set free. She's already been in state custody since 2023. Jury selection began July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court. The job that once meant she saved lives is now the state's argument for why she took some. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMurders #ClancyTrial #MassachusettsCrime #MurderTrial

If Lindsay Clancy is convicted of first-degree murder, a Massachusetts judge has no room to weigh in on her sentence at all. The charge carries mandatory life without parole. Not the illness, not the medication, not the wheelchair, not a single fact about who she was before January 24, 2023, when Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan died at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home. The judge doesn't get a say. Neither does the jury, once they've reached that verdict. Lindsay is pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. She's a former labor and delivery nurse. Prosecutors say roughly three months before the killings, she typed something about her older children into her phone, a note a prosecutor later read aloud in court. The defense says she'd been begging the medical system for help for weeks and was handed prescriptions instead. She's permanently paralyzed after going out a second-story window the night her children died. The other possible outcome isn't freedom either. A finding of not criminally responsible sends her to a locked state psychiatric hospital with periodic reviews to determine whether she can ever safely return to a community. She's already been in state custody since 2023. Two rigid outcomes, and nothing in between since prosecutors dropped the lesser charges that once existed. Jury selection began July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court, and whichever way this goes, one number, life without parole or indefinite commitment, is the only thing waiting on the other side. Patrick Clancy is on the defense witness list. He and Lindsay have separately sued her healthcare providers, arguing the treatment she received played a direct role in what happened. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NotCriminallyResponsible #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMurders #ClancyTrial #CriminalJustice #InsanityDefense 

There used to be a middle ground in the Lindsay Clancy case. As of July 9, there isn't one anymore. Prosecutors dropped all three strangulation charges against Lindsay Clancy that day, calling them redundant. What that filing actually did was erase the space between the two remaining verdicts: life without parole, or not criminally responsible. No compromise. No lesser finding for the jury to land on if they're not fully convinced either way. Lindsay is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. She'd checked herself into a psychiatric hospital on New Year's Eve after telling her husband she was having thoughts of hurting her children. She was discharged. Nineteen days later, the children were dead. Her attorney puts her medication count at roughly thirteen psychiatric drugs across about four months, with a dose increase and a sleepless night the day before it happened. The narrowing didn't stop there. On July 13, the judge blocked women who've survived postpartum psychosis from testifying about the condition in their own words. On July 20, the first morning of jury selection, prosecutors moved to challenge the defense's own experts, the third motion in eleven days aimed at limiting Lindsay's defense. Patrick Clancy, her husband, is on the defense witness list. He's also suing her healthcare providers and has publicly asked people to forgive her. Two jurors were seated by lunch. The trial is expected to run four to eight weeks, and whatever verdict comes out of it, there's no door left open in between. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMassachusetts #ClancyTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility 

The day before Lindsay Clancy killed her three children, her medication was increased. Nobody has fully explained why that decision was made, or by whom. She'd already been on roughly thirteen different psychiatric drugs across about four months. Her own malpractice lawsuit describes that final dose increase, paired with a night without sleep, in the hours before Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, died in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. She'd checked herself into a psychiatric hospital on New Year's Eve after telling her husband she was having thoughts of hurting her children. She was discharged. Nineteen days later, the children were dead. Jury selection began July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court. That same morning, before a single juror was seated, prosecutors moved to challenge her defense experts, the third motion in eleven days aimed at limiting her defense. Prosecutors had already dropped all three strangulation charges on July 9, calling them redundant, a move that erased any middle ground between the two remaining verdicts: life without parole, or not criminally responsible. On July 13, the judge blocked women who've survived postpartum psychosis from testifying about the illness in their own words. That leaves the jury with paper: prescription records, a dosage change, a malpractice complaint describing exactly how the medication was mishandled. Two jurors were seated by lunch. The trial is expected to run four to eight weeks. Patrick Clancy, her husband, is on the defense witness list. He's also suing her healthcare providers and has publicly asked people to forgive her. Thirteen drugs, one increase, one sleepless night, and a question nobody in that courtroom has fully answered yet. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #ClancyTrial #InsanityDefense #MentalHealthSystem #JurySelection 

Lindsay Clancy told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts. Her lawsuit says nobody ever asked her the one follow-up question that might have changed everything. Lindsay, a former labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital, is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Between September 2022 and January 2023, she was prescribed at least nine different psychiatric medications. Her husband, Patrick, has said she seemed to be acting like a zombie. An outside hospital later determined she'd been overmedicated and misdiagnosed, and her nurse practitioner allegedly never responded when she reached out. Her civil lawsuit alleges that what she reported as intrusive thoughts were actually auditory hallucinations, and that the distinction never got explored. A forensic psychiatrist has since diagnosed her with Bipolar Disorder I with postpartum onset, a condition where the very antidepressants doctors prescribe can trigger psychosis. Postpartum psychosis affects roughly one to two women out of every thousand births, and there is still no standardized screening for it anywhere in the country. She was also gravely injured that night and has been paralyzed from the waist down ever since. She has never given police a statement about what happened, not once, in three and a half years. Prosecutors have their own version of that missed question. They argue other mothers who lived through postpartum psychosis or depression without harming their children prove sickness alone doesn't explain what happened. Judge William Sullivan agreed and kept those witnesses off the stand, though the comparison stayed part of the record. Jury selection begins July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court. Patrick Clancy is on the defense witness list and has publicly asked people to forgive his wife. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMassachusetts #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

A judge just decided the jury in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial won't hear from anyone who's actually lived through what her defense says she was living through. Lindsay Clancy is charged with killing her three children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity, and her attorneys wanted other mothers who've experienced postpartum psychosis to testify about what that actually looks like from the inside. The judge said no. Here's what the jury will hear instead: that Lindsay was prescribed at least ten different medications over four months, with eight of them stacked into a single three-week span. That her psychiatric appointments were virtual and sometimes lasted seventeen minutes. That she hospitalized herself three times, called a crisis hotline and was turned away, and told her providers directly that she was having thoughts of harming her children. A hospital assessment ruled out bipolar disorder at the time, an assessment two civil lawsuits now allege was dangerously wrong. A forensic evaluation after the killings diagnosed her with Bipolar Disorder I with psychosis and postpartum onset. Prosecutors counter with their own version: that Lindsay checked Apple Maps to time a fifty-four-minute window, and that her fitness tracker logged her climbing three flights of stairs right after she sent her husband out. Patrick Clancy, the man who found their children, is on the witness list for her defense, not against her. Patrick has also filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the healthcare providers he believes let his wife spiral without ever intervening. Jury selection begins July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court, where two very different pictures of the same woman are about to collide. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMassachusetts #MurderTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #Justice

Lindsay Clancy has been in custody or in a hospital bed for three and a half years, and in all that time, she has never once given police a statement. She's a former labor and delivery nurse charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan, at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. She's pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. She was also gravely injured that night and has been paralyzed from the waist down ever since. Prosecutors have spent years reconstructing what they believe happened using medication records and search histories, building their case around a woman who has never told her own side to investigators. Between September 2022 and January 2023, she was prescribed at least nine different psychiatric medications. Her husband, Patrick, has said she seemed to be acting like a zombie. An outside hospital later determined she'd been overmedicated and misdiagnosed, and her civil lawsuit alleges that what she reported as intrusive thoughts were actually auditory hallucinations nobody thought to ask more about. A forensic psychiatrist has since diagnosed her with Bipolar Disorder I with postpartum onset. Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague has argued to the judge that other mothers who experienced postpartum psychosis or depression without harming their children shouldn't be allowed to testify for the defense. Judge William Sullivan agreed and kept them off the stand. Eighteen jurors will be seated instead of the usual sixteen, a sign of how long this trial is expected to run. Patrick Clancy is on the defense witness list and has publicly asked people to forgive his wife. Jury selection begins July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court, where twelve of those jurors will have to reconstruct a state of mind that Lindsay Clancy herself has never described out loud. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #ClancyTrial #JurySelection #InsanityDefense 

(2:00) Is Duce's belief in Norvell contagious? (8:00) Jury still out on Mike! (11:30) Best FSU duo (15:20) Shoulda asked Jimbo... (20:00) LLCs (30:00) Norvell as position coach evaluator (38:30) AI (45:00) Stadium guy (48:00) Football character (55:00) Coaching profile red flags (1:04:00) QB (1:17:00) Where FSU ranks as a job Music: Bush - 60 Ways To Forget People Follow CumminsLifestyle on IG Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Listener Discretion Advised: This episode discusses severe postpartum mental illness, violence against children, and suicide. Jury selection is underway in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Prosecutors say Lindsay Clancy intentionally killed her three young children, while the defense argues she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and the effects of prescribed medications. Veteran trial attorney and Vinnie Politan Investigates host Vinnie Politan discusses the legal strategies, jury selection, and the key issues that could shape the outcome of this highly anticipated trial. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

(2:00) Is Duce's belief in Norvell contagious? (8:00) Jury still out on Mike! (11:30) Best FSU duo (15:20) Shoulda asked Jimbo... (20:00) LLCs (30:00) Norvell as position coach evaluator (38:30) AI (45:00) Stadium guy (48:00) Football character (55:00) Coaching profile red flags (1:04:00) QB (1:17:00) Where FSU ranks as a job Music: Bush - 60 Ways To Forget People Follow CumminsLifestyle on IG Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The jury is seated. Now the real legal fight begins. Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty in the deaths of her three children, with openings set for Monday.   Prosecutors say this was intentional; the defense says postpartum psychosis and medication destroyed criminal responsibility. Scott breaks down the evidence battle, the sensitive 911 motion, and what jurors must actually decide.   Watch to the end and tell us: premeditation, insanity defense, or reasonable doubt? #LindsayClancy, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #MurderTrial, #CriminalDefense

Three cases dominating the national conversation. Three investigations where the questions outnumber the answers. And one retired FBI Special Agent who isn't bound by any gag order, any jurisdiction dispute, or any institutional concern.Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke for an extended discussion covering the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, the Nolan Wells investigation, and the Siders family case.On Clancy: the prosecution says she mapped her husband's errand. The defense says nine medications caused psychosis she couldn't control. The judge blocked other mothers from testifying and refused to split the trial. Jury selection is four days out.On Nolan Wells: friends left him on Horn Island without a phone or water. His body was found two days later. The friends' stories conflict. His Snapchat was allegedly erased. The FBI is analyzing digital evidence. Ben Crump's team says the case goes to a grand jury.On the Siders: sixteen children found in a twelve-by-twelve room in Ohio. Some nonverbal. DNA testing is underway after the AG labeled it "intrafamily." One defendant's attorney secured a gag order covering every official in the case. Elizabeth Siders was thirteen when her first child was born.Coffindaffer addresses each case from a federal investigative standpoint — what the evidence actually proves, where the gaps are, and who is being protected by the silence. This is the full conversation covering every segment in one discussion.Three cases. Zero easy answers. One agent who has spent a career finding them anyway.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NolanWells #SidersFamily #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBI #TrueCrime #16Kids #MurderTrial #Justice

Jury selection is underway in Lindsay Clancy's Massachusetts murder trial, with 18 jurors sought for a case expected to last weeks. The defense argues postpartum psychosis means she was not criminally responsible; prosecutors say the evidence shows planning. Scott breaks down why juror bias, media exposure, expert testimony, and landmark insanity cases may shape the verdict. Watch and comment: is this a murder case, a mental health case, or the hardest legal line to draw? #LindsayClancy, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #InsanityDefense, #PostpartumPsychosis

Jury selection is underway in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, MA, mother charged with killing her three young children in 2023. Clancy has pleaded not guilty, with her defense expected to argue she was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness, while prosecutors maintain the killings were planned. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jury selection is underway in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, MA, mother charged with killing her three young children in 2023. Clancy has pleaded not guilty, with her defense expected to argue she was suffering from severe postpartum mental illness, while prosecutors maintain the killings were planned. Dan spoke with attorney Philip A. Tracy Jr. about the key legal issues in the case.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jury selection resumes this morning, The Red Sox continue their winning streak, US Forces wrap up a 10th straight night of airstrikes in Iran. Stay in "The Loop" with WBZ Newsradio.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lindsay Clancy told her doctors she was having thoughts of harming her children. They prescribed more medication. Her husband begged them to stop. They increased the dosage. Three children are dead, and the only person sitting at a defendant's table is the mother who tried to get help.Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder for the January 2023 deaths of five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan in Duxbury, Massachusetts. She is pleading not guilty by reason of insanity, arguing she was experiencing postpartum psychosis driven by command hallucinations and a catastrophic failure of medical care.According to two civil lawsuits — one filed by Lindsay, one by her husband Patrick — Lindsay was prescribed at least ten psychiatric medications in four months by providers who never coordinated her treatment or arrived at a correct diagnosis. She was a labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital who understood something was wrong and fought to get help. She voluntarily hospitalized herself three times. She called a crisis hotline and was turned away because she didn't have a specific plan.Patrick Clancy, the father of all three children, filed a wrongful death suit against her healthcare providers. He is testifying for the defense at her murder trial. He has publicly blamed the medical system — not his wife — for what happened.The prosecution argues Lindsay was lucid and planned the killings. Their key evidence of her mental state: a hospital assessment that ruled out bipolar disorder. Two lawsuits and a forensic psychiatric evaluation allege that assessment was wrong. The diagnosis she needed — Bipolar Disorder I with psychosis and postpartum onset — came after her children were already gone.Jury selection begins July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMassachusetts #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #PostpartumDepression #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial begins in days. Jury selection opens July 20 in Plymouth. She is charged with ending the lives of all three of her children during a fifty-four-minute window while her husband was picking up takeout she asked him to get. Prosecutors say she checked Apple Maps to time the drive.The defense says she was drowning. Nine medications prescribed across dozens of appointments — eight of those medications added in a single three-week stretch. Virtual psychiatric visits that lasted seventeen minutes. A hospital that evaluated her, concluded she was overmedicated and misdiagnosed, and discharged her anyway. Her attorney offered to formally admit she was responsible for all three deaths if the judge would let the jury consider guilt and sanity separately. The judge declined.The judge also blocked fifteen women who wanted to testify about their own postpartum psychosis — women who had experienced command hallucinations like the ones Lindsay described. The court ruled medical experts are sufficient. The defense lost the most emotionally powerful testimony it had.Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired FBI Special Agent, sits down with Tony and Robin to dissect the case heading to trial. She addresses whether the Apple Maps evidence is as damning as the prosecution believes, how a jury handles hearing a confession and an insanity defense in the same breath, and what happens when Patrick Clancy — the father who forgave — takes the stand and tells the jury his wife got sick.Lindsay Clancy is paralyzed. She's in a wheelchair. The doctors who prescribed her nine medications are named in two civil lawsuits — but not a single one of them is sitting at a defendant's table.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #JurySelection #Justice #AppleMaps

Lindsay Clancy checked a mapping application to calculate how long her husband's errand would take. Then, according to prosecutors, she used that fifty-four-minute window to end the lives of Cora, Dawson, and Callan.The defense says she was hearing a voice she couldn't refuse. Nine medications — eight prescribed in a three-week span. Psychiatric appointments that were virtual and lasted seventeen minutes. A hospital that told her she was overmedicated and misdiagnosed, then sent her home without follow-up. Her attorney offered to formally admit she was responsible for all three deaths if the judge would split the trial into two phases: guilt first, sanity second. The judge refused.Now the jury will hear the confession and the psychosis evidence at the same time. The judge also blocked other mothers from testifying about their own experiences with postpartum psychosis — ruling that medical experts can cover the condition adequately. Fifteen women had contacted the defense wanting to tell the jury they had heard the same kind of voices.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sits down with Tony and Robin to walk through the implications. Can psychosis and planning coexist? Did the judge's rulings just tilt the trial toward the prosecution? And how does a jury process a father — Patrick Clancy — who forgave his wife, sued her doctors, and is taking the stand for the defense?Jury selection begins July 20 in Plymouth Superior Court. The trial is expected to run four to six weeks. Lindsay Clancy is paralyzed and in a wheelchair. The system that prescribed her nine medications has never been in a courtroom.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #JurySelection #Justice #AppleMaps

Patrick Clancy's three children are dead. His wife killed them. And he's standing in a courtroom pointing at her doctors, not at her.Lindsay Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder for the January 2023 deaths of Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home. She has admitted, through her attorney, that she caused their deaths. Her defense: postpartum psychosis so severe she heard a commanding voice she could not resist.What makes this case unlike any other insanity defense is Patrick. The father. The man who found the children. The man whose 911 call the prosecution wants to play for the jury. He is testifying for the defense. He filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's healthcare providers. He told The New Yorker he wasn't married to a monster — he was married to someone who got sick.According to two malpractice lawsuits, Lindsay was prescribed at least ten psychiatric medications over four months by providers who failed to coordinate her care or correctly diagnose her condition. She hospitalized herself three times. She reported thoughts of harming her children. She called a crisis hotline and was told she didn't qualify for help. Her husband begged a nurse to stop the medications and start over. They upped her dosage.One hospital had the chance to catch what was happening. They ruled out bipolar disorder and sent her home. A forensic evaluation after the killings diagnosed her with Bipolar Disorder I with psychosis and postpartum onset. The prosecution is now using that hospital's assessment — the one the lawsuits say was wrong — as evidence that Lindsay was sane.Jury selection begins July 20. The question isn't just whether Lindsay Clancy was legally responsible. It's whether anyone else will ever be held accountable.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMassachusetts #MentalHealth #TrueCrimePodcast #PostpartumDepression #CriminalJustice

Ten people remain in critical condition including the suspected shooter following a late-night mass shooting outside a Tucson pizza restaurant. Jury selection begins in Massachusetts as former nurse Lindsay Clancy heads to trial for the murders of her three young children she alleges she committed while suffering from severe postpartum psychosis. An Arizona man faces felony charges in Colorado after allegedly riding atop a Union Pacific freight train completely in the nude. Sydney Silvagni reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jury selection begins this morning in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, Another week of no Jackpot winner for Megabucks, Gas prices are averaging 4-dollars a gallon again. Stay in "The Loop" with WBZ Newsradio.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Das Blasorchester Neuenkirch ist eine von acht Schweizer Formationen, die am 20. World Music Contest in den Niederlanden teilnehmen. Der World Music Contest findet vom 9. Juli bis zum 2. August in Kerkrade NL in der Nähe von Maastricht statt. Während viele Musikvereine Sommerpause machen, probt das Blasorchester Neuenkirch intensiv für den Wettbewerb. «Natürlich wollen wir gut abschneiden, aber uns ist auch die gemeinsame Zeit als Verein wichtig», sagt der Präsident des Blasorchesters Neuenkirch, Michel König, im Gespräch mit der SRF Musikwelle. Ihren aktuellen Formstand haben die Musikantinnen und Musikanten bereits am Eidgenössischen Musikfest 2026 in Biel eindrücklich bewiesen. In der Konzertmusik der Kategorie Harmonie 1. Klasse holten sie sich den 1. Rang vor ihrer Jury. «Das schafft Selbstvertrauen und kittet den Verein zusammen», freut sich Michel König. Das Blasorchester Neuenkirch wird am 25. Juli am Wettbewerb teilnehmen. Die weiteren Schweizer Formationen am diesjährigen World Music Contest sind (in der Auftrittsreihenfolge): Brass Band Schüpfen, Brass Band Treize Étoiles, Ensemble de Cuivres Ambitus, VBJ Youth Wind Orchestra, Blasorchester Stadtmusik Luzern, Jugend-BLO Oberer Sempachersee und Symphonisches BLO Kreuzlingen.

07-18-26See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

One of my favorite movies is Twelve Angry Men. The original was made in 1957 starring Henry Fonda, then it was remade for TV in 1997 starring Jack Lemmon. It's a true-crime courtroom drama, but most of the action takes place in the jury deliberation room for a murder trial. I think both versions are pretty good. But we know how Hollywood likes to play up the drama and the theatrics, and what we see on the screen is entertaining, but not always very accurate. Wouldn't it be interesting to know what it's like to actually be on a jury for a murder trial? That's what my guest today, Jami, is going to talk about. She was actually the jury foreman. Jami told this story here on the podcast about 4 years ago, and it was a really popular episode. She's a great storyteller and I think you'll enjoy hearing all the behind-the-scenes details about being on a jury for a major case – and how this experience inspired her to start her OWN true crime podcast. If you'd like to contact Jami, her website is https://Murderish.com Full show notes and pictures for this episode are here: https://WhatWasThatLike.com/262 Graphics for this episode by Bob Bretz. Transcription was done by James Lai. Want to discuss this episode and other things with thousands of other WWTL listeners? Join our podcast Facebook group at WhatWasThatLike.com/facebook (many of the podcast guests are there as well) Get every episode ad-free, AND get all the Raw Audio exclusive episodes to binge, by joining the other listeners at What Was That Like PLUS. Try What Was That Like PLUS free: iPhone: at the top of the What Was That Like podcast feed, click on “Try free” Android: on your phone, go to WhatWasThatLike.com/PLUS and click to try it free on any app Sponsor deals: Visit AuraFrames.com and use promo code WHATWAS at checkout to get $45 off. If you're 21 or older, get 25% OFF your first order + free shipping @IndaCloud with code [WHATWAS] at https://inda.shop/[WHATWAS]! #indacloudpod Go to ThriveMarket.com/WHATWAS to get 30% off your first order, plus a FREE $60 gift just for signing up. Go to Quince.com/whatwas for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns! Get 15% off OneSkin with the code [WHATWAS] at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod Try Mint Mobile for 3 months, for just 15 bucks a month - MintMobile.com/WHAT Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today - A Cochise County felony trial ended before a jury could even be seated, after a prosecutor’s comment prompted the judge to declare a mistrial.Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Listen Ad Free https://www.solgoodmedia.com - Listen to hundreds of audiobooks, thousands of short stories, and ambient sounds all ad free!

Saade Aala Radio | Punjab vs Himachal? Punjab vs Uttarakhand? Or Just Stupid People?Every time a fight breaks out involving people from different states, social media does what it does best...It stops looking for facts and starts looking for teams.In this episode, we discuss how individual crimes and clashes are quickly transformed into State vs State or Community vs Community narratives, making the situation far worse than it actually is.We begin with the recent clash involving Nihangs in Uttarakhand.Within hours, social media had already decided the story.Some called it Punjab vs Uttarakhand.Others turned it into Sikhs vs Uttarakhand.But was it really?We discuss how a dispute involving a few individuals suddenly becomes a battle between millions of innocent people who had absolutely nothing to do with the incident.We've seen this pattern before.Whenever an incident happens between Punjabis and locals in Himachal Pradesh, social media immediately turns it into Punjab vs Himachal.Instead of discussing what actually happened...People begin defending "their side."Facts disappear.Logic disappears.Only emotions remain.One of the biggest points we make in this episode is simple:If someone commits a crime...They should face legal action.Not become the representative of an entire state, religion or community.Crime belongs to individuals.Not geography.We also discuss a worrying trend seen in several incidents.Instead of informing the police or allowing the legal system to work...Groups of people decide to punish others themselves.Public beatings.Mob justice.Instant verdicts.We ask a simple question:When did ordinary citizens become the courts of India?Justice cannot exist if every crowd starts making its own law.Today people don't wait for investigations.They wait for someone to blame.One video...One headline...One viral clip......and suddenly millions of people start fighting online over something they know almost nothing about.This episode is about breaking that cycle.Because every incident deserves facts—not hashtags.At Saade Aala Radio, we believe stupidity has no religion, no state and no nationality.When someone does something wrong...Call out the individual.Not an entire community.That's how societies stay united.

Danish filmmaker Mads Mengel joins Past Present Feature just before his world premiere of The Guest in the Crystal Globe Competition at the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival. Since this recording, The Guest has gone on to win the festival's Special Jury Prize, while Mengel received the Best Director Award. We discuss how the film grew from a simple question into an intimate family drama shaped by years of writing, collaboration, and refinement.Along the way, we explore contained storytelling, the Danish filmmaking model, building a visual language around performance rather than coverage, and why practical limitations often lead to stronger creative decisions. Mads also reflects on the films and filmmakers that shaped his love of cinema, including Magnolia, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The Lord of the Rings, 12 Angry Men, and The Conversation.At its core, our conversation is about making more with less, trusting the people around you, and discovering that limitations often become your greatest creative advantage.What Movies Are You Watching?Introducing the Past Present Feature Film Festival, a new showcase celebrating cinematic storytelling across time. From bold proof of concept shorts to stand out new films lighting up the circuit, to overlooked features that deserve another look. Sponsored by the Past Present Feature podcast and Leica Camera. Submit now at filmfreeway.com/PastPresentFeature Revival Hub is your guide to specialty screenings in Los Angeles - classics on 35mm, director Q&As, rare restorations, and indie gems you won't find on streaming. We connect moviegoers with over 200 venues across LA, from the major revival houses to the 20-seat microcinemas and more.Visit revivalhub.com to see what's playing this week. Support the showListen to all episodes on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more, as well as at www.pastpresentfeature.com. Like, subscribe, and follow us on our socials @pastpresentfeatureThe Past Present Feature Film Festival - Nov. 19-21, 2026 in Hollywood, CA - Submit at filmfreeway.com/PastPresentFeature

Barry Morphew's murder trial was supposed to start in October, and his defense team told the court they simply weren't ready. The judge granted the delay anyway, the third postponement in a case that has now stretched six years without a single witness taking the stand. Suzanne Morphew's siblings had already booked travel to be there. Those plans are being canceled. Thirty-one motions were filed in a single day leading up to the ruling, and the back-and-forth between defense and prosecution over what qualifies as a legitimate reason to push the date has only intensified. But the delay isn't happening in a vacuum. Before Barry was taken back into custody in June 2025, he had spent months living in Cave Creek, Arizona, under a name that wasn't his own. The woman he was living with had no idea who he actually was until five days before his arrest, when he finally told her the truth and gave her an account of what happened to Suzanne that doesn't line up with anything in the indictment. Investigators also found an AR-15 and a silencer inside his safe. This episode breaks down the defense's argument for more time, the prosecution's opposition, and what Barry was doing in the months leading up to his re-arrest while the case sat unresolved. Suzanne's family in Indiana is still waiting to bury her. Barry has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and is presumed innocent under the law. Jury selection is now expected to begin October 13 in Alamosa. Two weeks after his second not-guilty plea, he also allegedly moved to have Suzanne's remains cremated, a request prosecutors intervened to stop with barely a day to spare. Here's everything that led to the delay, laid out in order. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #HiddenKillers #MorphewDelay #AlamosaCourt #TrueCrime #ColoradoCrime #MorphewTrial #CaveCreekArizona #MorphewCase 

Alex Murdaugh's legal team is betting the retrial on a piece of evidence SLED collected and then let sit for years: unknown male DNA found under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails the night she and her son Paul were killed at the family's hunting property. That sample was never run against a genealogy database, and now the defense wants it sent to Othram, the same forensic lab whose genetic work helped identify Bryan Kohberger as a suspect in Idaho. Attorney Jim Griffin argued in court that the technology needed to trace that DNA simply didn't exist when investigators first bagged it, and it does exist now. It's one of several motions filed ahead of an April 5, 2027 retrial date, alongside a request tied to first-responder statements that, according to defense attorney Dick Harpootlian, contradict each other about who was actually on the property that night. Harpootlian told the court the defense has fielded tips from people claiming to have information and passed them along to SLED, with no confirmation any were pursued. The new judge assigned to the case, Debra McCaslin, has already signaled she won't tolerate delay tactics, and Attorney General Alan Wilson has kept capital punishment on the table for a defendant already serving multiple life sentences. This episode lays out the DNA motion in full, why the defense is citing the David Camm wrongful-conviction case as a warning sign, and the strongest counterargument prosecutors are expected to raise: that a trace of someone else's DNA under a fingernail doesn't automatically mean a second person was involved. Two people died at those kennels, and one of them was holding onto evidence the state never finished testing. The next hearing lands August 14, and both sides already sound like they're preparing for a fight that goes well past the DNA. Hear the case for reopening it. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #MurdaughRetrial #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #Othram #DNAEvidence #MaggieMurdaugh #BryanKohberger #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #ForensicGenealogy 

Barry Morphew spent months living under names that weren't his own while awaiting trial for his wife Suzanne's murder. After the original case against him collapsed and the lead prosecutor was disbarred, Barry left Colorado and settled into a trailer park in Cave Creek, Arizona, more than six hundred miles from where Suzanne's remains were found in a shallow grave near Moffat. A bar manager in Cave Creek knew him as Bruce. A gas station clerk knew him as Lee. Neither one learned who he actually was until the day law enforcement showed up to arrest him. One night at the bar, a woman recognized his face, said his real name out loud, and Barry looked her in the eye and denied it. He wasn't living alone. The woman he was with had no idea about his real identity either, and according to court filings, he only told her the truth five days before his arrest, along with a version of what happened to Suzanne that doesn't match what prosecutors have laid out in the indictment. Barry was eventually re-indicted by a grand jury, extradited back to Colorado, and released on three million dollars bond, at which point he pleaded not guilty for the second time. Two weeks after that, he allegedly moved to have Suzanne's remains cremated, a request prosecutors caught and blocked with barely a day to spare. This episode traces the aliases, the arrest, and the girlfriend who says she believed a completely different man for years. Jury selection begins October 13 in Alamosa. Barry has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, and the law presumes him innocent, but the string of names he used along the way is part of what jurors will eventually hear. Hear what the people closest to Barry Morphew never actually knew about him. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #HiddenKillers #LeeMooreAlias #CaveCreekArizona #MorphewTrial #TrueCrime #ColoradoCrime #FugitiveAlias #MorphewCase 

Barry Morphew kept more than just cash and paperwork in his safe. When investigators searched it, they found an AR-15 and a silencer, sitting alongside the ordinary contents of a man who insists he had nothing to hide. It's one detail among several that prosecutors say points to a defendant who spent years preparing for exactly this moment. Suzanne Morphew's remains were recovered from a shallow grave near Moffat, Colorado, and an autopsy found a wildlife tranquilizer known as BAM in her bone marrow, a substance investigators say only one private citizen in that part of the state had legal access to at the time: Barry Morphew. After the first case against him fell apart and the original prosecutor was disbarred, Barry relocated to Cave Creek, Arizona, and lived under aliases that even the woman he was with didn't see through until five days before his arrest. He was eventually re-indicted, extradited, and released on three million dollars bond, and pleaded not guilty a second time to first-degree murder. Two weeks later, he allegedly tried to have Suzanne's remains cremated, a move prosecutors caught and stopped with almost no time left on the clock. This episode walks through the safe, the tranquilizer, and the timeline prosecutors have built connecting all of it, alongside the honest counterargument the defense is expected to raise about circumstantial evidence and access. Jury selection begins October 13 in Alamosa, and Suzanne's family, still in Indiana, is finally getting close to a trial six years in the making. He's pleaded not guilty and remains presumed innocent under the law, but the physical evidence stacking up in that safe and in that bone marrow report is what a jury will finally get to weigh. Decide for yourself what the evidence adds up to, and whether the timing of it all still looks like coincidence. SOCIAL LINKS & LEGAL FOOTER Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #HiddenKillers #BAMTranquilizer #MorphewTrial #TrueCrime #ColoradoCrime #MoffatColorado #AlamosaCourt #MorphewCase 

Auf den Film, in dem Bi Gan die letzten hundert Jahre des Kinos auf geisterhafte Art und Weise aufleben lässt, mussten wir ebenso eine Ewigkeit warten. Jetzt läuft "Resurrection", der 2025 in Cannes mit dem Spezialpreis der Jury ausgezeichnet wurde, auch bei uns und Lucas und Christian...fremdeln zunächst ein wenig mit ihm? In einer Zukunft, in der die Menschen unsterblich geworden sind, weil sie nicht mehr träumen, werden die letzten Träumer gejagt. Einen von ihnen begleiten wir durch mehrere Träume, einen Stummfilm, eine Detektivgeschichte, ein Geister-Märchen, einen Gangster-Film und eine Vampir-Romanze. Wie genau, die Episoden zusammenhängen, was sie uns über das Kino erzählen und was genau das mit dem Träumen zu tun hat, besprechen Lucas und Christian in dieser Folge. Wir haben mit Nadin Mai schonmal eine Folge zum restlichen Werk von Bi Gan gemacht: https://cuts.podigee.io/87-special-bi-gan Hier der Link zur Gelesen-Folge zu "Dungeon Crawler Carl": https://gelesen.podigee.io/20-neue-episode

The jury begins deliberating in the murder trial of Larry Millete, the man accused of killing his wife, Maya, in a case with no body, no crime scene, and no murder weapon. We break down the final arguments from both the prosecution and defense. Plus, more public restrooms close around Mission Bay as San Diego works to address its budget deficit, Waymo announces self-driving robotaxis are coming to San Diego, and an unusual pet store burglary ends with a pregnant snake safely returned home.

KeKe is the judge and you are the JURY! Is Connie wrong for calling her best friend's baby UGLY?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Kouri Richins jury didn't want to convict her. The foreperson said the panel came in sympathetic, even hoping she was innocent. They returned a unanimous guilty verdict in about three hours anyway. This look back, with retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, examines the evidence strong enough to defeat the jury's own wishful thinking.The case had visible holes. No murder weapon. A star witness whose credibility cracked on cross. A defense that rested without a single witness, betting on reasonable doubt. So what closed the gap? Coffindaffer breaks down what the verdict actually rested on — and the centerpiece may be Eric himself. Roughly a year and a half before his death, he quietly restructured his entire estate, telling his attorney the reason was to protect his children from his wife. That documented fear, put into legal form before the fact, sat in front of the jury alongside the financial pattern: undisclosed debt, insurance policies Eric reportedly didn't know about, alleged forged signatures.No single piece closed the case. Together, they drew something the jury couldn't reason its way out of. Coffindaffer also assesses the appeal record — the witness-coaching video, the credibility damage, the detective's admission that fentanyl was never physically recovered — and whether any of it has a realistic shot at moving the verdict. We revisit where the case stood at the time of our reporting.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsVerdict #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #JenniferCoffindaffer #UtahMurder #TrueCrime #EstatePlanning #GuiltyVerdict #HiddenKillers

The prosecution's entire fentanyl theory ran through one person — and the defense tore her apart on the stand. Yet the jury still convicted Kouri Richins on every count. This look back, with defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke, examines how that happened.Housekeeper Carmen Lauber was the only witness linking Kouri to the drug that killed Eric. Jurors watched footage of investigators telling Lauber she needed to provide details to secure a murder conviction — before her story changed. They heard her credibility collapse on cross, and learned of her drug-court violations mid-trial. The lead detective confirmed that years of work uncovered no fentanyl physically tied to Eric's death. The defense rested without a single witness, trusting that what it built through the state's own people was enough.Dreeke walks through the behavioral mechanics of how a jury holds all of that at once — a damaged witness, a missing weapon, a four-year investigation with gaps — and still arrives at guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Motta breaks down the defense's choices, what worked in cross, and the one call he thinks may have sealed the outcome. We revisit where the case stood at the time of our reporting and what it reveals about how juries weigh credibility against motive. Richins has maintained her innocence and stated she intends to appeal.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrime #UtahMurder #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers

Ashley Hollis on How to Win Big Brother In this “How to Win Big Brother” preseason strategy guide, host Taran Armstrong teams up with BB27 champion Ashley Hollis to pull back the curtain for anyone hoping to snag the BB28 crown. Ashley walks through exactly how she weighed big endgame decisions, like the nerve-wracking choice to cut Morgan, and how she mapped out every possible jury scenario to secure the win. She details surviving as an early outsider, using late-night detective work to spot secret alliances, and why listening more than talking builds unbreakable trust. Together, they decode the Blockbuster twist's impact on alliance power and HOH strength, highlighting how new twists demand a flexible, forward-thinking approach. Ashley also opens up about the careful dance of revealing personal secrets to lock in loyalty, leveraging social dynamics, and using different personalities in the house to her advantage. Throughout, the conversation is packed with actionable tips for BB28 hopefuls, from prepping speeches to reading the room, making the tough cuts, and seizing those moments that can turn the whole game around. Ashley breaks down her game-winning plan for endgame choices, showing listeners how to get into a finale mindset early. Insights for underdogs: How late-night strategy tracking, social listening, and well-timed honesty get you off the bottom. Jury management: Advice on bringing people into your decisions and connecting personal promises to final speeches. Blockbuster twist lessons: How flexible alliance play and vote math matter more than ever when the power shifts weekly. Tips for balancing emotional influence and honest gameplay, and why knowing yourself—and how others see you—can keep you off the block. With BB28 around the corner, these winning secrets, social tricks, and strategic insights from BB26 and BB27 reveal what it really takes to come out on top. Who will risk everything, and who will build steady bonds in the race to become the next Big Brother champ? Get the full “How to Win Big Brother” breakdown now—perfect listening for anyone prepping their game for BB28! Chapters: 0:00:00 Introduction and welcome 0:02:19 Ashley’s final competition decision 0:03:12 Strategic endgame planning 0:06:07 Analyzing opponents’ strengths 0:09:46 Influencing jury votes 0:13:14 Managing final two expectations 0:17:09 Hiding lawyer identity 0:20:16 Building trust with secrets 0:26:27 Learning from strong players 0:28:31 Recovering from early setbacks 0:33:19 Blockbuster twist impact 0:39:37 Houseguest consensus and lying 0:44:47 Reading personalities for strategy 0:47:40 Maintaining self-perception 0:52:03 Prioritizing game over friendship 0:58:24 Final advice to contestants Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Big Brother coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Big Brother podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

Ashley Hollis on How to Win Big Brother In this “How to Win Big Brother” preseason strategy guide, host Taran Armstrong teams up with BB27 champion Ashley Hollis to pull back the curtain for anyone hoping to snag the BB28 crown. Ashley walks through exactly how she weighed big endgame decisions, like the nerve-wracking choice to cut Morgan, and how she mapped out every possible jury scenario to secure the win. She details surviving as an early outsider, using late-night detective work to spot secret alliances, and why listening more than talking builds unbreakable trust. Together, they decode the Blockbuster twist's impact on alliance power and HOH strength, highlighting how new twists demand a flexible, forward-thinking approach. Ashley also opens up about the careful dance of revealing personal secrets to lock in loyalty, leveraging social dynamics, and using different personalities in the house to her advantage. Throughout, the conversation is packed with actionable tips for BB28 hopefuls, from prepping speeches to reading the room, making the tough cuts, and seizing those moments that can turn the whole game around. Ashley breaks down her game-winning plan for endgame choices, showing listeners how to get into a finale mindset early. Insights for underdogs: How late-night strategy tracking, social listening, and well-timed honesty get you off the bottom. Jury management: Advice on bringing people into your decisions and connecting personal promises to final speeches. Blockbuster twist lessons: How flexible alliance play and vote math matter more than ever when the power shifts weekly. Tips for balancing emotional influence and honest gameplay, and why knowing yourself—and how others see you—can keep you off the block. With BB28 around the corner, these winning secrets, social tricks, and strategic insights from BB26 and BB27 reveal what it really takes to come out on top. Who will risk everything, and who will build steady bonds in the race to become the next Big Brother champ? Get the full “How to Win Big Brother” breakdown now—perfect listening for anyone prepping their game for BB28! Chapters: 0:00:00 Introduction and welcome 0:02:19 Ashley’s final competition decision 0:03:12 Strategic endgame planning 0:06:07 Analyzing opponents’ strengths 0:09:46 Influencing jury votes 0:13:14 Managing final two expectations 0:17:09 Hiding lawyer identity 0:20:16 Building trust with secrets 0:26:27 Learning from strong players 0:28:31 Recovering from early setbacks 0:33:19 Blockbuster twist impact 0:39:37 Houseguest consensus and lying 0:44:47 Reading personalities for strategy 0:47:40 Maintaining self-perception 0:52:03 Prioritizing game over friendship 0:58:24 Final advice to contestants Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Big Brother coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Big Brother podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

The Kouri Richins prosecution faced a structural challenge that would sink many cases: no direct evidence established how the fatal dose of fentanyl was administered, and the defense built its entire strategy around that absence. The jury convicted on all counts regardless. This look back examines how a largely circumstantial case secured a conviction for first-degree aggravated murder.Over a trial spanning roughly three weeks and more than forty prosecution witnesses, the Summit County Attorney's Office advanced a theory of financial motive and escalating intent. The state presented evidence of significant debt, a forged insurance application, and a prior attempt on the victim's life weeks before his death — the basis for a separate attempted-aggravated-murder conviction. The autopsy established fentanyl intoxication at approximately five times a lethal level. Prosecutors argued the drug was introduced through the victim's drinks, though they did not present direct evidence of the mechanism. The defense rested without calling witnesses.We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting. The segment analyzes the evidentiary standard at work — how a jury may convict beyond a reasonable doubt on an accumulation of circumstantial proof — and what this outcome suggests about motive-driven prosecutions in the absence of physical certainty. The defendant has maintained her innocence and stated her intention to appeal, and the analysis treats the conviction as the legal finding it is while noting the appellate posture.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #CircumstantialEvidence #AggravatedMurder #TrueCrime #ProsecutionCase #InsuranceFraud #HiddenKillers

Kaôh F***ing Rong Rewatch Ep 11 Survivor: Kaôh R?ng takes center stage on “Kaôh F*ing Rong” as hosts Rob Cesternino and Chappell dissect Episode 11's explosive shifts, tough social decisions, and the mounting pressure as the finale draws near. Right from the opening, the podcast zooms in on Michele's sudden ascent—after a quiet edit, Michele's reward win launches her “winner montage” and finally spotlights her powerful social strategy in the late game. Rob digs into striking comparisons between Michele's and Aubry's journeys—both know when to step back and when to act, proving sometimes the best move is letting others self-destruct. Chappell unpacks Tai's idol decision gone wrong and his bumpy path as he faces down angry former allies and an unimpressed jury. The duo debates if Tai's track record of flip-flopping costs him respect, interrogates Cydney's role as a critical swing vote, and scrutinizes whether it's wiser to boot physical threats or strategic underdogs. The episode brings lighter moments too, with a reward meal complete with fried chicken, wine, and a surprisingly pivotal ladies’ alliance discussion. – Michele's game ignition after her big reward and immunity wins cements her as a contender as hosts highlight her self-awareness and social strength – Tai's idol mishap and his failure to recover respect from the jury, leading to his fate as a zero-vote finalist – Cydney's tricky position as the swing vote: should she side with Michele and Aubry, or flip to Jason and Julia for a potential win? – Jury perceptions, alliance voting blocks, and why targeting “goats” like Jason versus jury threats like Julia matters in the late game – Unforgettable scenes at reward, a throwback puzzle challenge, and musings on the evolving look of Survivor's jury As alliances fracture and the endgame rushes closer, “Kaôh F*ing Rong” ponders: will Michele's timing mark her as the winner, can Aubry capitalize on her bonds, or will Cydney shake up the final act? With every move under the microscope, who will outwit and outlast to claim the title? Dive into all the strategy, shifting loyalties, and behind-the-scenes talk on this week's episode, and find out which path to the end looks the most dangerous—and the most promising! Chapters: 0:00 Aubry and Michele Parallels Arise 1:23 Michele’s Social Game Spotlight 4:47 Aftermath of Tai’s Idol Decision 7:57 Tai Moves From Threat to Zero Votes 13:01 Reward Challenge: Cydney, Michele, Aubry 17:13 Memorable Meal: Wine, Fried Chicken, Coleslaw 22:05 Michele Dominates Memorization Immunity Challenge 25:45 Talking Jury Looks and Survivor Fashion 27:03 Jason and Julia Pitch Targeting Tai 29:38 Cydney’s Swing Vote Dilemma 32:46 Joe’s Endgame and Jury Scenarios 34:08 Julia’s Game Ends at Final Seven 37:16 Tribal Council Whispers: Should Tai Play Idol? 40:43 Why Julia Goes Over Jason 43:46 Cydney and Jason's Relationship Revisits 44:14 Looking Ahead: Survivor Kaoh Rong Finale To order Rob’s book, The Tribe and I Have Spoken, visit www.robhasabook.com Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Survivor coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Survivor podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

Kaôh F***ing Rong Rewatch Ep 11 Survivor: Kaôh R?ng takes center stage on “Kaôh F*ing Rong” as hosts Rob Cesternino and Chappell dissect Episode 11's explosive shifts, tough social decisions, and the mounting pressure as the finale draws near. Right from the opening, the podcast zooms in on Michele's sudden ascent—after a quiet edit, Michele's reward win launches her “winner montage” and finally spotlights her powerful social strategy in the late game. Rob digs into striking comparisons between Michele's and Aubry's journeys—both know when to step back and when to act, proving sometimes the best move is letting others self-destruct. Chappell unpacks Tai's idol decision gone wrong and his bumpy path as he faces down angry former allies and an unimpressed jury. The duo debates if Tai's track record of flip-flopping costs him respect, interrogates Cydney's role as a critical swing vote, and scrutinizes whether it's wiser to boot physical threats or strategic underdogs. The episode brings lighter moments too, with a reward meal complete with fried chicken, wine, and a surprisingly pivotal ladies’ alliance discussion. – Michele's game ignition after her big reward and immunity wins cements her as a contender as hosts highlight her self-awareness and social strength – Tai's idol mishap and his failure to recover respect from the jury, leading to his fate as a zero-vote finalist – Cydney's tricky position as the swing vote: should she side with Michele and Aubry, or flip to Jason and Julia for a potential win? – Jury perceptions, alliance voting blocks, and why targeting “goats” like Jason versus jury threats like Julia matters in the late game – Unforgettable scenes at reward, a throwback puzzle challenge, and musings on the evolving look of Survivor's jury As alliances fracture and the endgame rushes closer, “Kaôh F*ing Rong” ponders: will Michele's timing mark her as the winner, can Aubry capitalize on her bonds, or will Cydney shake up the final act? With every move under the microscope, who will outwit and outlast to claim the title? Dive into all the strategy, shifting loyalties, and behind-the-scenes talk on this week's episode, and find out which path to the end looks the most dangerous—and the most promising! Chapters: 0:00 Aubry and Michele Parallels Arise 1:23 Michele’s Social Game Spotlight 4:47 Aftermath of Tai’s Idol Decision 7:57 Tai Moves From Threat to Zero Votes 13:01 Reward Challenge: Cydney, Michele, Aubry 17:13 Memorable Meal: Wine, Fried Chicken, Coleslaw 22:05 Michele Dominates Memorization Immunity Challenge 25:45 Talking Jury Looks and Survivor Fashion 27:03 Jason and Julia Pitch Targeting Tai 29:38 Cydney’s Swing Vote Dilemma 32:46 Joe’s Endgame and Jury Scenarios 34:08 Julia’s Game Ends at Final Seven 37:16 Tribal Council Whispers: Should Tai Play Idol? 40:43 Why Julia Goes Over Jason 43:46 Cydney and Jason's Relationship Revisits 44:14 Looking Ahead: Survivor Kaoh Rong Finale To order Rob’s book, The Tribe and I Have Spoken, visit www.robhasabook.com Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Survivor coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Survivor podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

The Defeat of Verres Through Storytelling. Guest Author: Josiah Osgood. In 70 BCE, Cicero prosecuted Verres in a trial that showcased his masterful use of storytelling and emotional appeal. Rather than overwhelming the jury with complex financial data about embezzlement, Cicero created a vivid image of Verres as a negligent leader. He recounted how Verres ignored his duties during a pirate raid on Syracuse, choosing instead to party with local women in seaside tents. This narrative portrayed Verres as living large at the expense of the Roman citizens he was meant to defend. Overwhelmed by the evidence and the public outcry, Verres defaulted mid-trial and fled Rome. Although he was found guilty, his punishment was merely exile to Marseilles, where he was allowed to keep much of his stolen art. For the Romans, losing citizenship and political rights was considered a severe fate, though it seems mild by modern standards. This victory propelled Cicero's political career as he sought the office of consul. The election process of the time mirrors modern participation, with citizens urged to vote on the Field of Mars. 3CARTHAGE

A Retrial is headed for October in the Case of the Alleged Palisades ArsonistSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

At least 188 people have died and more than 1,500 are injured after a devastating pair of earthquakes struck Venezuela on Wednesday, according to the country's National Assembly president. Anderson speaks to César Jiménez, a resident of Caracas who survived the earthquakes, along with his family and pet dog. He also works with the aid group Project Hope in Venezuela and toured some of the hardest-hit areas today. Plus, a year-and-a-half after fire devastated the Los Angeles neighborhood of Pacific Palisades, jurors have deadlocked on charges against the alleged arsonist. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Xavier’s Blueprint for Winning Big Brother Today, in this special “How to Win Big Brother” episode, host Taran Armstrong welcomes BB23 winner Xavier Prather to break down the art of outsmarting, outplaying, and outlasting in the BB house. As secrets swirl and power shifts, smart players are working overtime to balance competitive fire, social bonds, and the risky game of keeping secrets. This week, Taran and Xavier dig into BB26's real-time action: how the players are preparing for— or deciding to throw—key competitions, where the social pecking order stands after a tense HoH, and how some houseguests are navigating jury management even before the votes. The discussion spotlights why studying past seasons (not just relying on AI tips!) can be the real edge, and how knowing what competitions to take seriously, and when to step back, can make a winner. They also highlight how revealing or hiding secrets—about your alliances, your showmances, or your own background—can swing trust in your favor or paint a target on your back, especially deep into the game. Xavier warns that relying on AI advice is lazy—true BB students watch and learn from previous seasons Positioning and perception are everything: players weigh when it's smart to win a comp or throw it without tipping off the house Building genuine social connections—and knowing which secrets to keep or share—can decide your fate and the jury's final vote Messy gameplay versus careful strategy: should players play for the drama or stick to the path of least resistance? The late-game challenge: Xavier reveals why the last evictions can shape the whole jury room, not just the finale chair As alliances shift and deals get cut, one misstep can turn the house upside down. Will BB26’s houseguests take Xavier's advice and control their own fate, or let paranoia and loose lips ruin their game? Tune in for the ultimate strategy guide to BB26—get inside the game, pick up winning tips, and see which houseguests might have what it takes to claim the $750K! Chapters: 00:00 Welcome to How to Win Big Brother 01:17 Big Brother research beats AI shortcuts 03:14 Training for Big Brother competitions 04:42 Athlete advantage in Big Brother 07:01 Throwing and winning competitions: balance 11:22 Navigating alliances and endgame moves 15:51 Physicality and hybrid competitions 20:11 Jury management for winning Big Brother 26:25 Final four decisions and tough cuts 33:00 Secrets, information, and trust building 41:37 Allies, secrecy, and reading loyalty 54:32 Final Big Brother advice and takeaways Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Big Brother coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Big Brother podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

Xavier’s Blueprint for Winning Big Brother Today, in this special “How to Win Big Brother” episode, host Taran Armstrong welcomes BB23 winner Xavier Prather to break down the art of outsmarting, outplaying, and outlasting in the BB house. As secrets swirl and power shifts, smart players are working overtime to balance competitive fire, social bonds, and the risky game of keeping secrets. This week, Taran and Xavier dig into BB26's real-time action: how the players are preparing for— or deciding to throw—key competitions, where the social pecking order stands after a tense HoH, and how some houseguests are navigating jury management even before the votes. The discussion spotlights why studying past seasons (not just relying on AI tips!) can be the real edge, and how knowing what competitions to take seriously, and when to step back, can make a winner. They also highlight how revealing or hiding secrets—about your alliances, your showmances, or your own background—can swing trust in your favor or paint a target on your back, especially deep into the game. Xavier warns that relying on AI advice is lazy—true BB students watch and learn from previous seasons Positioning and perception are everything: players weigh when it's smart to win a comp or throw it without tipping off the house Building genuine social connections—and knowing which secrets to keep or share—can decide your fate and the jury's final vote Messy gameplay versus careful strategy: should players play for the drama or stick to the path of least resistance? The late-game challenge: Xavier reveals why the last evictions can shape the whole jury room, not just the finale chair As alliances shift and deals get cut, one misstep can turn the house upside down. Will BB26’s houseguests take Xavier's advice and control their own fate, or let paranoia and loose lips ruin their game? Tune in for the ultimate strategy guide to BB26—get inside the game, pick up winning tips, and see which houseguests might have what it takes to claim the $750K! Chapters: 00:00 Welcome to How to Win Big Brother 01:17 Big Brother research beats AI shortcuts 03:14 Training for Big Brother competitions 04:42 Athlete advantage in Big Brother 07:01 Throwing and winning competitions: balance 11:22 Navigating alliances and endgame moves 15:51 Physicality and hybrid competitions 20:11 Jury management for winning Big Brother 26:25 Final four decisions and tough cuts 33:00 Secrets, information, and trust building 41:37 Allies, secrecy, and reading loyalty 54:32 Final Big Brother advice and takeaways Never miss a minute of RHAP's extensive Big Brother coverage! LISTEN: Subscribe to the Big Brother podcast feed WATCH:  Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT:  Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

You HAVE to see this — the women of "The View" just got the Karmelo Anthony stabbing case completely WRONG, and their race-baiting lies are blowing up in their faces! Pat Gray breaks down the shocking misinformation "The View" pushed about the Texas track meet murder for which Karmelo Anthony was sentenced to 35 years for stabbing Austin Metcalf. From claiming it wasn't a "jury of his peers" because there were no black jurors (a total myth — "jury of peers" means from the community, not by race) to lying about Anthony's weight being 130 pounds to falsely saying he was the "only black kid under the tent" — when multiple black witnesses actually testified against him. "The View" ignored the facts: Anthony was the aggressor, brought a knife, ignored repeated warnings to leave, and stabbed Metcalf in the heart over a shove. This isn't justice — it is anti-woke media spinning a clear murder case to divide Americans. We also cover: 29% of New Yorkers now admit they HATE how New York is going. James Talarico openly HATES Christianity. Have you seen the missing Texas giraffe? Lizzo's latest album, “Bitch,” completely flops — here's why. Pat gives a painful update on his home renovation (and it's not good). Drop your thoughts in the comments RIGHT NOW: Do you think "The View" is deliberately lying to push a race narrative? YES or NO? What shocked you most about the show's misinformation on the Karmelo Anthony case? Should shows like "The View" be held accountable for spreading false information? I read every single comment from fellow patriots like you — your voice matters in the fight for truth! If you're tired of the media twisting stories to attack common sense and American values, smash that LIKE button, SUBSCRIBE for more unfiltered conservative truth bombs, and share this with every friend who wants real justice. We're exposing the lies together and taking our country back one video at a time. Let's go! 00:00 Pat Gray UNLEASHED! 00:16 Pat's House Remodeling Continues to Go Wrong 03:38 Tesla Crashes Through House in Houston, TX 05:02 BYU Talk 06:24 Gas/Oil Prices are Back to Normal! 06:49 Trump's Update on Gas/Oil Prices 08:04 Marco Rubio on Iran Becoming a Normalized Country 09:24 Marco Rubio on Iran's Proxies Attacking Israel 11:33 Trump has Iran on the Ropes! 13:40 Trump on Iran Not Inviting IAEA Inspectors 15:34 Trump on John Thune / SAVE Act 21:04 James Talarico Hates Christianity 23:34 Socialists Win All the New York Primaries 25:46 Chuck Schumer on the SAVE Act 31:50 Chewing the Fat 49:17 U.S. National Soccer Team Takes On Türkiye 49:56 Upcoming Special Episode on 'An Inconvenient Truth' 51:13 COVID-19 Montage 57:01 Al Gore Destroys his own Argument 1:05:03 Graham Platner on "New Definitions of Freedom" 1:06:28 Graham Platner on Planned Parenthood 1:09:48 Tommy Tuberville on Tulsi Gabbard's Findings 1:12:08 The View Lies about Karmelo Anthony 1:24:32 Footage of Karmelo Anthony Attacking Austin Metcalf 1:30:09 63% of New Yorkers are Unhappy with Zohran Mamdani 1:32:23 Democrats Want to Change the U.S. for the Worse Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

President Trump says he won't sign a bipartisan housing bill until his stalled voting legislation gets moving. The US attorney's office in Chicago is in disarray after issues around recent grand jury presentations. Jury deliberations begin in the trial of the man accused of starting the deadly and historically destructive Palisades Fire in Los Angeles. An independent United Nations commission found Israel is deliberately targeting children during its ongoing genocide of the Gaza Strip. And another NBA draft class is full of freshmen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices