Podcasts about shadid lewis

This debate was recently deleted from David Wood's former YouTube channel (Acts17Apologetics, now Hatun Tash DCCI Ministries on YouTube). I saved a copy of it before it was deleted because we at MDD wanted to ensure this epic debate remains on YouTube. I recently asked for (and was granted) permission to re-upload David's now-deleted debates into the Modern-Day Debate library. LINKS TO GUESTS:Dr. David Wood: https://www.youtube.com/c/PhilosophyUndergroundShadid Lewis: https://the-case-for-islam.webs.com/__________________________________________________________________Welcome to Modern-Day Debate. Our vision is to provide a fully-neutral platform so everyone has their fair shot to make their case on a level playing field. Ways to support this vision:Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ModernDayDebateUsing our Amazon referral link to make your purchases: https://www.amazon.com/shop/modern-daydebate*This is our Amazon affiliate link: https://www.amazon.com/shop/modern-daydebate*If you click that link and make your usual Amazon purchases, 2-3% of your purchase goes to Modern-Day Debate while you still pay the same price for your Amazon products!_______________________________________________________________________________WANT TO COME ONTO MDD? CHECK OUT THIS INFO PAGE:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kdwtQrA7QevNev9Mjm4xKvHnTkJ7FY-rMLjqUhtZKmI/edit?usp=sharing_______________________________________________________________________________RULES FOR CHAT-Chats flagrantly disrespectful toward speakers will receive a warning. *Attack the ideas instead of the person.-Chatters continuing the disrespect after a warning will be banned.-Chatters violating YouTube TOS are banned immediately.______________________________________________________________________________________DISCLAIMER The views shared by guests on Modern-Day Debate are not necessarily representative of the views of Modern-Day Debate, James, or any university he has or has had any affiliation with. This includes our debate podcast.______________________________________________________________________________________I'm a Christian. If you ever want prayer or just someone to talk to after a horrible day, please reach out and let me know. I'm not a counselor and thus can't counsel anyone, but as mentioned, I'm happy to listen if you had a bad day. moderndaydebate@gmail.com__________________________________________________________________________________#Debate #Podcast

4/20/19 Saturday 1pm ET/12pm CTRL/11am MTN/10am Pac Call in and listen or share comments or questions durng the live Q and A segment of the debate at 1-347-934-0379 Or online at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/healingxoutreach/2019/04/20/hxo-debate-is-jesus-god-muslim-shadid-lewis-vs-catholic-william-albrecht Not in the United States compare your times available using: https://www.worldtimebuddy.com   Also check out our new You Tube channel at: https://www.youtube.com/user/Gusdaberean/videos?view_as=subscriber  Shadid Lewis is a Muslim apologist from the Muslim Debate Initiative and will be taking the negative position to today's debate topic! You can find out more about Shadid and the MDI at: https://thedebateinitiative.com/  Also on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/MuslimDebateInitiative/  William Albrecht is a Catholic apologist and has a B.A. in theology is a member of the Catholic apostolate, the Catholic Legate. You can find out more about him at his You Tube page and on facebook at: http://catholic-legate.com/  http://www.youtube.com/gnrhead   http://www.godtube.com/catholic/

Anthony Rogers vs Shadid Lewis Is belief in the Trinity polytheism For original YouTube video click here. Audio extracted and polished by http://www.christianaudiodebates.com

David Wood vs Shadid Lewis Is Islam a Threat to the West ? For original YouTube video click here. Audio extracted and polished by http://www.christianaudiodebates.com

David Wood vs Shadid Lewis Peace and Violence in Christianity and Islam For original YouTube video click Part 1, Part 2. Audio extracted and polished by http://www.christianaudiodebates.com

Nabeel Qureshi and Shadid Lewis debate the reasons why they chose to leave their respective religions. (22 March, 2008) Link to the YouTube video is here. Audio extracted and polished by http://www.christianaudiodebates.com

In this episode, my evaluation of the case made by Shadid Lewis. Does he establish, on grounds which his opponent must affirm, that the Trinity implies polytheism? See Lewis's arguments as analysed on the post for episode 17. What is the doctrine of the Trinity anyway? Are the persons members of an eternal group of wonderfully unified friends? Or are they aspects or personalities of the one God? Or what? Is this just about the "deity of Christ"? And what is the doctrine of two natures in Christ, and does it show how one and the same being could be, e.g. mortal and immortal? Moreover, who do you think won this debate? Let us know what you think. Click here to upload your audio feedback, for possible use in a future episode – .wav, .mp3, and probably any other common audio format should be OK. Try to keep it to a minute or less. You can also listen to this episode on Stitcher or iTunes (please subscribe, rate, and review us in either or both – directions here). It is also available on YouTube (scroll down – you can subscribe here). If you would like to upload audio feedback for possible inclusion in a future episode of this podcast, put the audio file here. You can support the trinities podcast by ordering anything through Amazon.com after clicking through one of our links. We get a small % of your purchase, even though your price is not increased. (If you see “trinities” in you url while at Amazon, then we’ll get it.) Referred to in or relevant to this episode: Their whole debate, in episodes of the trinities podcast, as well this and my first evaluation episodes. Posts on Islam-inspired modalism (i.e. one-self trinitarianism) Posts on the indiscernibility of identicals. Sophisticated recent "relative identity" trinitarianism explained. Sophisticated recent Incarnation / two-natures theories explained. On Christmas-time claims that the one God became a baby. A post by J. Matthan Brown on the "hypostatic union." biblical theophanies the straw man fallacy on Christian appeals to "mystery"

In his debate with Muslim apologist Shadid Lewis does Reformed Christian apologist Anthony Rogers establish the consistency of the Trinity and monotheism? That is, does he prove that the Trinity doctrine is not a form of polytheism? Is this episode, we examine his arguments, and discuss the Qur'an, abrogation, and whether it always distinguishes Christians from polytheists Rogers's argument from Genesis 18-19 that Moses taught multiple persons in God Rogers's argument from John 8 and Matthew 28 :19 that Jesus taught the same You may want to refer to the analyses I gave in this previous blog post. Next week, in episode 21, we'll look at Lewis's side of the debate. You can also listen to this episode on Stitcher or iTunes (please subscribe, rate, and review us in either or both – directions here). It is also available on YouTube (scroll down – you can subscribe here). If you would like to upload audio feedback for possible inclusion in a future episode of this podcast, put the audio file here. You can support the trinities podcast by ordering anything through Amazon.com after clicking through one of our links. We get a small % of your purchase, even though your price is not increased. (If you see “trinities” in you url while at Amazon, then we’ll get it.) Books quoted in this episode: Hugh Goddard, A History of Christian-Muslim Relations (Chicago: New Amsterdam Books, 2000), pp. 27-8. The Racovian Catechism, trans. Thomas Rees (London, 1818), pp. 37-9. The Qur'an, trans. M.A.S. Abdul Haleem (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 118-9. Not quoted here, but helpful regarding the topics of abrogation, quranic interpretation, and the historical order of the suras: Neal Robinson, Discovering the Qur'an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text, 2nd ed. (London: SCM Press, 2003).

On September 9,  2013, Reformed Christian apologist Anthony Rogers debated Islamic apologist Shadid Lewis. The debate question was: Are trinitarians polytheists? (Entire video here.) I think this debate is worth thinking through carefully. In this podcast series, I'm breaking up the debate into three listenable chunks. I've also slightly shortened the audio by removing some dead air, etc., but I have not deleted a single word by the two debaters. I will end with a podcast evaluating their arguments. Each episode will also have a blog post wherein I try to accurately summarize and formulate some of the arguments. This episode: opening statements. Rogers starts off with a problem for his opponent, which I think is best put as an inconsistent triad: Trinitarian Christians are polytheists. The Qur'an implies that Christians are not polytheists. Everything the Qur'an implies is true. Rogers's argument is that is opponent is committed to 1 and 3. But he hasn't noticed that he's also committed to 2. His views, then, are inconsistent. Rogers will deny 1 (and 3), so he has no problem. But Shadid must, inconsistently, commit to all three. But from any two of them, it logically follows that the remaining claim is false. (Go ahead, try all the combinations.) In support of 2, Rogers offers: Muslim men can marry Christian women (5:5),  but they can't marry polytheistic women. (2:221) Muslims can eat food prepared by Christians (5:5), but not by polytheists (6:121). 22:17; 98:1, 6; 2:105; 5:82; 3:186; and a hadith from Muhammad imply that no Christian is a polytheist. On to his positive case, Rogers affirms monotheism. But he adds that both Moses and Jesus, who were both monotheists, also taught that God is multipersonal, as so their monotheism implied multiple "persons" in the one God. Argument 1: Genesis 19:24 mentions two persons called "Yahweh." Therefore, Genesis 19:24 implies that there are at least two persons or beings "in God." (This confirmed when the Targums say call the "YHWH" on earth the Memra (Word) of YHWH.) Argument 2: In John 8, Jesus says "I am," and so claims to be the eternal, divine Son who appeared to Abraham. (Also John 1, 20:28.) [But John also teaches that the Father is an eternal, divine person, who is different than the Son.] Therefore, John teaches that there are at least two persons "in God." Argument 3: Matthew 28:19 implies that the three named are distinct yet all "are" one God. Argument 4: I didn't catch this one on the first couple listens, but Mr. Rogers seems to be also offering an argument like this: Jesus and Moses taught monotheism, and "multiple persons in God." [The teachings of Jesus and Moses regarding the one God are self-consistent.] Therefore, monotheism and "multiple persons in God" are compatible. On to Mr. Lewis's opening statement. First, he accurately defines polytheism and trinitarianism. Then a lot of what he says, I think, comes down to this first main argument: If the Trinity doctrine is true, Jesus is a god. If Jesus is a god, then he is a different god than his Father. Therefore, if the Trinity doctrine is true, then polytheism is true. (1, 2) Polytheism is false. Therefore, the Trinity doctrine is false.  (3,4) 3 does follow from 1-2, and 5 from 1-3. The argument is valid, and it would seem that his opponent grants 1 and 3. But why accept 2? He's got a supporting argument for 2. [For any x and y, if x differs from y, then x and y are not the same god.] Jesus and his Father differ. Therefore, Jesus and his Father are not the same god. To back up 2 in the supporting argument, Lewis points out that Jesus, but not God (aka the Father) has a god, calls someone else "the only true God", doesn't know something, calls out to God from the cross,  increased in wisdom, and was raised and exalted by God, where Stephen saw him by God's side. And some of those same texts, he argues,

Original Youtube video here.

Original Youtube video here.