Podcasts about vinorelbine

Dr. Heather Wakelee, Stanford University Medical Center, lists standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, comparing their administration and uses.

Dr. Heather Wakelee, Stanford University Medical Center, lists standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, comparing their administration and uses.

Dr. Heather Wakelee, Stanford University Medical Center, lists standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, comparing their administration and uses.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite advances and progresses in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy over the last decades, the death rate from lung cancer has remained largely unchanged, which is mainly due to metastatic disease and multi drug resistance. Because of the overall poor prognosis, new treatment strategies for lung cancer patients are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the interactions between pemetrexed and vinorelbine for human adenocarcinoma via various chemotherapy schedules. Vinorelbine and pemetrexed caused a strong dose-dependent cytotoxic effect in both HCC and cisplatin resistant HCC (HCC-res) cells. The IC50 values of vinorelbine against HCC and HCC-res cells were 10.34±1.12 nM and 9.98±2.12 nM, respectively. The IC50 values of Pemetrexed against these cells were 110.77±17.28 nM and 118.89±18.77 nM respectively. The application of different therapy schedules induced a significant time dependent cell growth inhibition on HCC naïve and cisplatin resistant cells. The therapy scheme of cisplatin→pemetrexed→vinorelbine showed the strongest inhibitory effect on both HCC and HCC-res cells. The application of different therapy schedules on HCC and HCC-res cells increased the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis, except the application of vinorelbine alone. In both HCC and HCC-res cells, cisplatin→pemetrexed→vinorelbine was found the most effective to induce apoptosis. The application of different therapy schedules on HCC and HCC-res cells increased cytoplasma calcium concentration. Only the application of vinorelbine alone failed to increase calcium concentration in HCC cells. The most elevated calcium concentration was found in the cells treated with cisplatin→pemetrexed→vinorelbine in both HCC and HCC-res cells As a conclusion, the sequential application of cisplatin, vinorelbine and pemetrexed has a synergistic effect in cell growth inhibition, apoptosis induction, and calcium concentration elevation in HCC and HCC-res cells. The calcium overload could lead to apoptosis, which was related to the cell growth inhibitory effect of chemotherapeutics in lung cancer cells. It might cast a light to develop chemotherapy schedules for patients, and to overcome cisplatin resistance in lung cancer.

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has improved survival in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I trial was performed in order to establish a dose recommendation for oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and simultaneous radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy and 2 cycles of cisplatin and oral vinorelbine which was administered at 3 different levels (40, 50 and 60 mg/m(2)). This was to be followed by 2 cycles of cisplatin/vinorelbine oral consolidation chemotherapy. The study goal was to determine the maximal recommended dose of oral vinorelbine during concurrent treatment. Results: 11 stage IIIB patients were entered into the study. The median radiotherapy dose was 66 Gy. Grade 3-4 toxicity included neutropenia, esophagitis, gastritis and febrile neutropenia. The dose-limiting toxicity for concurrent chemoradiotherapy was esophagitis. 9 patients received consolidation chemotherapy, with neutropenia and anemia/thrombocytopenia grade 3 being the only toxicities. The overall response was 73%. Conclusion: Oral vinorelbine 50 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15 over 4 weeks) in combination with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (days 1-4) is the recommended dose in combination with radiotherapy (66 Gy) and will be used for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a forthcoming phase III trial testing the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy in patients not progressing after chemoradiotherapy.

Background: HER2 is overexpressed in 20 - 30% of breast cancers. Compared to chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with trastuzumab improves clinical outcome in patients with HER2- positive metastatic breast cancer ( MBC). In general, HER2 status in a primary lesion predicts the status of metastases, so that biopsy of metastatic lesions appears unnecessary. Case Report: A 39- year old woman was diagnosed with primary breast cancer in November 2000. Using the method and scoring system of the DAKO Hercep Test, the tumor has shown low HER2 expression ( DAKO score 1+). After failure of several chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease ( liver, skeletal), the patient underwent CT- guided needle biopsy of the liver which showed HER2 positive adenocarcinoma ( DAKO score 3+). In consequence, the patient was treated with vinorelbine ( 30 mg/ m(2) d1,8,15 q4w) and trastuzumab ( 4 mg/ kg loading dose, 2 mg/ kg weekly). During a treatment period of 4 months imaging results as well as tumor marker kinetics indicated an excellent response with sustained decrease of tumor markers. A retrospective analysis of the HER2 shed antigen in metastatic stage revealed excessively increased serum levels and supports HER2 overexpression observed in liver metastasis. The kinetics of the HER2 shed antigen during therapy for metastatic disease were found to be in phase with the kinetics of CEA and CA15- 3. Conclusion: This case report demonstrates that re- evaluation of the HER2 status may be helpful in single patients not sufficiently responding to treatment of metastatic disease. Determination of HER2 overexpression may be facilitated by a determination of the HER2 shed antigen level in peripheral blood.

Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and mitomycin C in combination with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. Patients and Methods: Between January 2003 and March 2004, 15 patients with T4/N2-3 squamous cell carcinoma (12/15) and with N3 cervical lymph node metastases of carcinoma of unknown primary (3/15) were treated with chemotherapy and simultaneous accelerated RT. Results: 11 patients completed therapy without interruption or dose reduction. Grade 3 - 4 acute mucosal toxicity was observed in 9/15 patients, grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 6/15 patients. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months, 2 patients have died of intercurrent disease, 2 patients have experienced local relapse; 5 patients are alive with no evidence of disease at the primary tumor site. Discussion: The described regimen is highly effective, but led to remarkable side effects.