POPULARITY
22 episodes with Adjuvant
23 episodes with Adjuvant
13 episodes with Adjuvant
10 episodes with Adjuvant
10 episodes with Adjuvant
11 episodes with Adjuvant
27 episodes with Adjuvant
20 episodes with Adjuvant
30 episodes with Adjuvant
4 episodes with Adjuvant
10 episodes with Adjuvant
26 episodes with Adjuvant
4 episodes with Adjuvant
4 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
6 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
5 episodes with Adjuvant
4 episodes with Adjuvant
6 episodes with Adjuvant
4 episodes with Adjuvant
6 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
5 episodes with Adjuvant
5 episodes with Adjuvant
3 episodes with Adjuvant
5 episodes with Adjuvant
3 episodes with Adjuvant
3 episodes with Adjuvant
3 episodes with Adjuvant
8 episodes with Adjuvant
5 episodes with Adjuvant
2 episodes with Adjuvant
2 episodes with Adjuvant
Learn how your treatment plan is decided and terms you may seeWe continue our series to help you understand cancer and its treatment. This week we focus on surgery, the oldest form of cancer treatment. Learn about surgery timing, types of cancer surgery, and how NCCN evidence-based guidelines provide a standard treatment path no matter where you are.In this Episode:02:58 - Wisconsin-Cheese, UFOs, and Booyah Stew04:52 - Anna Quindlen: Get a Life Where You Are Generous"08:06 - Medical Specialists Involved in Cancer Care08:52 - Treatment Decisions, Tumor Board and NCCN Guidelines12:03 - Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy13:13 - Surgery Timing, Reasons and Types18:00 - Discussion - NCCN and Role of Research24:34 - Reeves Keyworth:“On Loved Ones Telling the Dying to ‘Let Go”23:54 - OutroSurgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy alone or in combination are the most-common methods used to treat cancer. Specific treatment varies depending on the kind of cancer, the extent of the disease, its rate of progression, and the condition of the person. Surgery alone may not result in a cure and often chemotherapy and/or radiation are needed after surgery. Learn all about surgery and the guidelines your doctor will be following for your treatment.Support the showGet show notes and resources at our website: every1dies.org. Facebook | Instagram | YouTube | mail@every1dies.org
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/DEJ865. CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until March 26, 2026.Intelligently Achieving the Potential of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibition in Reducing Risk of Recurrence While Maintaining QOL in HR+, HER2- EBC: An AI-Driven Educational Resource for Improving MDT Collaboration and Patient-Clinician Communication In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/DEJ865. CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until March 26, 2026.Intelligently Achieving the Potential of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibition in Reducing Risk of Recurrence While Maintaining QOL in HR+, HER2- EBC: An AI-Driven Educational Resource for Improving MDT Collaboration and Patient-Clinician Communication In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/DEJ865. CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until March 26, 2026.Intelligently Achieving the Potential of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibition in Reducing Risk of Recurrence While Maintaining QOL in HR+, HER2- EBC: An AI-Driven Educational Resource for Improving MDT Collaboration and Patient-Clinician Communication In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/DEJ865. CME/MOC/CC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until March 26, 2026.Intelligently Achieving the Potential of Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibition in Reducing Risk of Recurrence While Maintaining QOL in HR+, HER2- EBC: An AI-Driven Educational Resource for Improving MDT Collaboration and Patient-Clinician Communication In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
How do the eligibility criteria for the monarchE and NATALEE clinical trials compare? Learning Objectives & Disclosures: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/1002403?ecd=bdc_podcast_libsyn_mscpedu
Drs. David Braun and Toni Choueiri join to discuss a groundbreaking Nature study on a personalized neoantigen vaccine for adjuvant renal cell carcinoma. They explore the inspiration behind the trial, how the vaccine was developed and administered, and its safety profile. The conversation also covers patient outcomes after 3-4 years, including immune responses and disease recurrence, as well as the rapid enrollment of this innovative study and what it means for the future of kidney cancer treatment. Read the publication in Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08507-5 Check out Chadi's website for all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes and other content. www.chadinabhan.com/ Watch all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes on YouTube. www.youtube.com/channel/UCjiJPTpIJdIiukcq0UaMFsA
John Chia discusses the results of the ASCOLT trial, which explored the effect of aspirin after completion of standard adjuvant therapy for patients with colorectal cancer.Read the full article:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(24)00387-X/fulltext?dgcid=buzzsprout_icw_podcast_generic_langasContinue this conversation on social! Follow us today at... https://bsky.app/profile/lancetgastrohep.bsky.social https://www.linkedin.com/company/langastro/ https://instagram.com/thelancetgroup https://facebook.com/thelancetmedicaljournal https://youtube.com/thelancettv
No description available
TWiV reviews passing of Ann Palmenberg, deadly illness in western Congo, US disruption of mpox and ebolavirus programs, first measles death in Texas outbreak, flu vaccine selection meeting postponed, US withdraws from polio, malaria, HIV programs and more, clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses have a long HA stalk, and systems vaccinology to identify predictors of durable antibody response to multiple vaccines in humans. Hosts: Vincent Racaniello, Alan Dove, Rich Condit, and Brianne Barker Subscribe (free): Apple Podcasts, RSS, email Become a patron of TWiV! Links for this episode Support science education at MicrobeTV ASV 2025 Ann Palmenberg dies (Cress) Ann at Chumakov Symposium (YouTube) Unknown illness in Congo (NY Times) Bad news about mpox outbreak (NPR) US interrupts Ebola prevention program (NPR) First measles death in Texas (Texas Trib) Flu vaccine selection meeting canceled (NY Times) US ends funding for polio, HIV, malaria and more (NY Times) Clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 neuraminidase has a long stalk (mBio) Predictors of durable antibody responses to vaccines (Nat Immunol) Review of adjuvants (Vaccinol Methods Vacc Res) Timestamps by Jolene Ramsey. Thanks! Weekly Picks Brianne – Video of the Northern Lights from Space Rich – Vaccination for Sudan Ebola virus disease Alan – Specialized moth wing scales give it 3-D camouflage (news and paper) Vincent – WHO Recommendations for Influenza Vaccine Composition for the 2025-2026 Northern Hemisphere Influenza Season Listener Picks Gerry – Eukaryotic Transcription Anne – The science of the solar system Intro music is by Ronald Jenkees Send your virology questions and comments to twiv@microbe.tv Content in this podcast should not be construed as medical advice.
In this episode, Jame Abraham, MD, FACP; William J. Gradishar, MD, FACP, FASCO; and Laura Spring, MD, review key insights and frequently asked questions related to the CDK4/6 inhibitors used to treat patients with early and metastatic hormone receptor (HR)–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer from a live program held in January 2025. Key clinical pearls include:Adjuvant treatment selection recommendations for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer based on disease and patient characteristics as well as the latest data and guidelines presented by Dr. GradisharTherapeutic strategies for patients diagnosed with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presented by Dr. AbrahamAddressing challenges related to CDK4/6 inhibitor adherence and adverse event mitigation presented by Dr. SpringPresenters:Jame Abraham, MD, FACPEnterprise Chair and Professor of MedicineDepartment of Hematology and Medical OncologyCleveland ClinicCleveland, OhioWilliam J. Gradishar, MD, FACP, FASCOBetsy Bramsen Professor of Breast OncologyRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer CenterNorthwestern UniversityChicago, IllinoisLaura Spring, MDBreast Medical OncologistMass General Hospital Cancer CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBoston, MassachusettsLink to full program including downloadable slides and on-demand webcasts: https://bit.ly/4b5GFqqTo claim credit for listening to this episode, please visit the podcast online at the link above.
Featuring perspectives from Dr Enriqueta Felip and Dr Helena Yu, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Disease (2:34) Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy (22:31) EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations (34:21) Antibody-Drug Conjugates (42:45) CME information and select publications
CME credits: 1.50 Valid until: 30-12-2025 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/adjuvant-treatments-for-hrher2-ebc-the-role-of-cdk46-and-parp-inhibitors/29826/ Treatment decision-making in breast cancer is complex and incorporates several factors including disease- and patient-related characteristics. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines are regularly updated to provide the most accurate recommendations based on recent scientific evidence and drug approvals. This activity has been designed to review the current NCCN guidelines and the supporting data and explore best practices for selecting therapy based on these recommendations. Explore guideline-based strategies and clinical data to optimize guideline-adherent care for patients with CLL/SLL and MCL.
In our exclusive interview, Dr Cohen provided insights into the evolving role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in clinical decision-making for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly through findings from the CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY trial (UMIN000039205). She highlighted how ctDNA has emerged as a strong prognostic factor for recurrence risk in CRC and explored its potential to guide therapy escalation or de-escalation. She also discussed the heterogeneity in the patient population included in the CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY study and how ctDNA negativity correlates with improved disease-free and overall survival. Additionally, Dr Cohen outlined what data are still needed to integrate ctDNA testing into routine clinical practice and how sustained vs transient ctDNA clearance may influence treatment and surveillance strategies moving forward.
In this episode, we're taking you behind the scenes into the fascinating world of fertility science with Natalie Moska, Laboratory Manager at Genea Fertility Perth. With over 16 years of experience across WA and the UK, Natalie shares her wealth of knowledge on the cutting-edge therapies helping patients on their fertility journey. We break down key adjuvant treatments like: PICSI – what is it, and who benefits? Zymot– how does it work for sperm selection? Calcium Ionophore Activation – the role it plays in fertilisation. Plus, Natalie opens up about her passion for embryology, her favourite part of the job, and what keeps her inspired in the lab. Whether you're deep in treatment or simply curious, this episode is packed with insights to help you understand the science behind fertility. Proudly supported by Genea Fertility
HER2 Breast Cancer is complicated, and this week, we explore those with residual disease post neoadjuvant therapy (KATHERINE) and the idea of de-escalation in a subpopulation of HER2-positive breast cancer patients (PERSEPHONE). The advent of a new class of drugs leads to excitement, unanswered questions and boundless opportunities. With ADC (antibody-drug conjugates) making their mark on traditional chemotherapy, the landscape of everything we treat is slowly changing. Studies discussed in the episode:KATHERINEPERSEPHONEFor more episodes, resources and blog posts, visit www.inquisitiveonc.comPlease find us on Twitter @InquisitiveOnc!If you want us to look at a specific trial or subject, email us at inquisitiveonc@gmail.comArt courtesy of Taryn SilverMusic courtesy of AlisiaBeats: https://pixabay.com/users/alisiabeats-39461785/Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only. If you are unwell, seek medical advice.Oncology for the Inquisitive Mind is recorded with the support of education grants from our foundation partners Pfizer, Gilead Pharmaceuticals and Merck Pharmaceuticals. Our partners have no editorial rights or early previews, and they have access to the episode at the same time you do. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode of SurgOnc Today®, Dr. Julie Hallet, Chair of the HPB Disease Site Work Group, and Dr. Patricio Polanco, Vice-Chair of the HPB Disease Site Work Group, are joined by Drs. Sajid Khan from Yale School of Medicine and Dr. Cecilia Ethun from UT Southwestern. They will wrap the 2024 HPB year by reviewing the top HPB surgical oncology published this year. References/Resources: #10: AMPLIFY https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02760-3 #9: Adjuvant therapy for IPMN-derived PDAC - https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.23.02313 #8: HELIX https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2822555 #7: CAMINO https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(23)00572-7/fulltext #5 : PANDAS/PRODIGE https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(24)03884-5/fulltext
Early Breast Cancer had one of its defining moments in the 1990s, when five years of adjuvant tamoxifen reduced the recurrence risk of invasive breast cancer by 49%! These days, those types of improvements are much harder to substantiate with the effect treatments currently on the market, but there is promise. This week, on our Back to Basics episode, Michael and Josh look at the role of abemaciclib and ribociclib in the adjuvant setting in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. Both of these drugs are CDK4/6 inhibitors and have been shows to be efficacious in the metastatic hormone receptor positive status breast cancer space.This week we explore MONARCH-E and NATALEE and highlight the data and how it could impact CKD's role in this emerging landscape.Studies discussed in the episode:MONARCH-ENATALEEFor more episodes, resources and blog posts, visit www.inquisitiveonc.comPlease find us on Twitter @InquisitiveOnc!If you want us to look at a specific trial or subject, email us at inquisitiveonc@gmail.comArt courtesy of Taryn SilverMusic courtesy of AlisiaBeats: https://pixabay.com/users/alisiabeats-39461785/Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only. If you are unwell, seek medical advice.Oncology for the Inquisitive Mind is recorded with the support of education grants from our foundation partners Pfizer, Gilead Pharmaceuticals and Merck Pharmaceuticals. Our partners have no editorial rights or early previews, and they have access to the episode at the same time you do. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
PeerView Family Medicine & General Practice CME/CNE/CPE Video Podcast
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
PeerView Family Medicine & General Practice CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BJE865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 21, 2025.Resect and Protect Against Melanoma Recurrence: Are You Prepared for the Present and Future of Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Stage II-III Disease? In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
In this episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast, hosts Drs. Rahul and Rohit Gosain welcome Dr. Martina Murphy, an Associate Professor of Medicine and Senior Associate Dean of Graduate Medical Education at the University of Florida, to discuss the current landscape of ovarian cancer. Join us as we dive into the critical aspects of diagnosing and managing ovarian cancer, including: • The importance of surgical staging and primary debulking surgery • The role of genetic testing, including BRCA and NGS, in treatment planning • Adjuvant therapy options, focusing on platinum-based chemotherapy and the use of Bevacizumab • Insights into PARP inhibitors and their application in BRCA-positive and wild-type patients • Navigating treatment options for relapsed and refractory ovarian cancer, including the use of antibody-drug conjugates like Mirvetuximab and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (TDXd). Dr. Murphy shares her expertise on the latest advancements in ovarian cancer treatment, the significance of genetic testing, and the management of side effects associated with various therapies. Tune in for a comprehensive overview of the standard of care for ovarian cancer and the evolving treatment landscape. Don't forget to check out our other episodes for more discussions on practice-changing data and current treatment options in oncology! Subscribe to the Oncology Brothers podcast for more insights and updates in the field of oncology! Website: http://www.oncbrothers.com/ X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers Contact us at info@oncbrothers.com
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/MZG865. CME/MOC/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until November 9, 2025.Reinforcing Precision Tactics in Genomically Altered Resectable NSCLC: Collaborative Workflows and Personalized Solutions for Integration of Adjuvant EGFR- and ALK-Targeted Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by independent educational grants from AstraZeneca and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
Dr. Shannon Westin and her guest, Dr. Brian Slomovitz discuss the article “Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy For Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors” recently published in the JCO and presented at the 2024 International Gynecologic Cancer Society. TRANSCRIPT The guest's disclosures can be found in the transcript. Dr. Shannon Westin: Hello, and welcome to another episode of JCO After Hours, the podcast where we get in depth on manuscripts and literature published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. I'm your host, Shannon Westin, gynecologic oncologist and JCO Social Media Editor by trade. I am thrilled because we are going to be talking about gynecologic cancer today. So, this is my jam. And specifically, we're going to be talking about a manuscript that's a simultaneous publication in the Journal of Clinical Oncology and presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society on October 16, 2024. And this is “Pembrolizumab or Placebo, Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy, With or Without Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed High Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results in Mismatch Repair Deficient Tumors.” This is affectionately the KEYNOTE-B21 trial, also known as the GOG-3053 trial and the ENGOT-en11 trial. And we are joined today by the primary author in this manuscript, Dr. Brian Slomovitz, who is the Director of Gynecologic Oncology at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach, Florida, and the clinical trial advisor in uterine cancer for the Gynecologic Oncology Group foundation. Welcome, Brian. Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Hey, thanks, Shannon, so much. It's a pleasure to be here. And thanks for giving us the opportunity to discuss this trial. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yes, it's a great trial and I'm so excited to talk about it. And I think we'll start just because this is a broad group that listens to this podcast, they're not all GYN oncologists, experts like yourself, so can you just level set a little bit and speak a bit about the incidence and mortality of endometrial cancer overall and the recent trends in this disease? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yeah, sure. So, and it is nice to speak about gynecologic cancers, as we know, endometrial cancer was and still is the most common of all gynecologic cancers. The numbers are going up. Right now, there's about 65,000 to 70,000 cases each year in the US diagnosed with endometrial cancer. The numbers are going up. A lot of its obesity related, some other factors, but as the population gets less healthy, those are some of the risk factors for the disease. The thing that, however, is quite surprising is that we're seeing the deaths due to endometrial cancer going up as well, while for other diseases, we're making slow, steady steps to try to decrease the mortality we're actually seeing an increase in mortality. And the most discouraging point, Shannon, as you know is the number of deaths from endometrial cancer is going to outnumber the number of deaths from ovarian cancer if it hasn't done it already. I mean, now's the time. So, we really need to come up with better treatment strategies to everything to decrease the incidence of disease, to help with prevention, but for those poor women who are diagnosed, to come up with better treatment options so we don't have to keep this increasing trend in mortality. Dr. Shannon Westin: Absolutely. And I think some of that is related and we don't need to get on a soapbox here, but the amount of funding that goes towards research in endometrial cancer, and of course you, you have been leading the way and really trying to get a ton of trials in this space and getting our industry partners and our government partners to really support this. So really just commending you on how much you've worked on, on this area. And to that end, we've had a huge renaissance with immunotherapy and endometrial cancer, a lot of really big trials. Why don't you give the audience a rundown of where, so far, this seems to be best utilized for people with endometrial cancer? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Thanks for that. And as you sort of alluded to, it's been a revolution, really, with immunotherapy. We started off at immunotherapy looking at microsatellite instability or the dMMR patients. What we found is similar to other disease sites in the second and third line setting that we saw good activity with the single agent checkpoints, pembrolizumab dostarlimab, that's based on the earlier KEYNOTE data and the GARNET trial. Really, a landmark study in the second line was Vicki Makker and her colleagues put pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination for those patients with the cold tumors. Not the dMMRs or MSI Highs, but the proficient mismatch repair. And that study in a second line setting found that it was better than chemotherapy for an overall survival advantage. So right there, we know that it works in the second line setting in the dMMR population, and we got an indication in the PMR population saying that immunotherapy works in all women with endometrial cancer at some point, then we really had the groundbreaking trials. And Shannon, thank you. You are the leader on one of the four trials that happened, to DUO-E, AtTEnd, GY018 and RUBY trial, all very similar studies showing that the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy in the first line, metastatic or recurrent setting had a better outcome for patients than if given chemotherapy alone. That actually led to amazing things. We had three of those drugs have FDA approvals, pembrolizumab for all comers, dMMR and PMMR in the first line metastatic setting with chemotherapy; Dostarlimab, PMR, dMMR in the first line or metastatic with chemotherapy. And Shannon, in your study, I think we still have to learn a lot from your study. DUO-E, chemotherapy plus minus dostarlimab. And you also added a PARP inhib, and those patients with a PARP did better. So I'm really looking forward to your data, to the subgroup analysis to figure out which of those patients, depending on the biomarker, do better with PARP therapy. And right now, you have a dMMR FDA indication. But who knows? The future is really exciting to see- to be splitters, not lumpers. And I really want to see how that data pans out. And so that's how it came into the first and second line setting and that led us really to come up with the idea for this trial to put it into the adjuvant setting. Dr. Shannon Westin: Right. And so, I think this would be really important because we're so ingrained in this. We see this on the day to day. Can you kind of tease out a little bit what's different about those patients that would be treated in that advanced recurrent setting versus the patients that would be potentially treated in this B21 study? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yeah, so the first step, we demonstrated the efficacy in patients that really the treatment options were an unmet need. In the second line setting, we didn't have good treatment options. Those are the patients with measurable disease, with symptomatic disease giving immunotherapy. And not only did we see the efficacy, which was better, but we also were able to give it with limiting the side effects as seen with chemotherapy, which is nice. And then we know that the first line therapy, traditionally for endometrial cancer with carboplatin paclitaxel, response rates about 50%, progression free survival about a year, really something that we needed to improve upon. So, adding immunotherapy to the platinum backbone therapy really demonstrated an advantage. But now what we want to do is we want to see if we could prevent, in the high-risk patients, those without disease, what can we do to help prevent the disease from recurring and help patients live longer without really the need for really lifesaving types of treatments? We want to prevent it from recurring. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah, I think that's essential. We know that if we can sit on that prevention side and kind of invest all the time and effort that we need to upfront, that really does yield the longer survival. So why don't you just walk through the overall design of this trial, please? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yeah. So, this was an all-comers trial, meaning in individuals that had high risk endometrial cancer, high risk for recurrence, that included, in endometrial cancer, we have aggressive histologic subtypes, serous histologies, clear cell histologies, any stage, as long as there was some myometrial invasion. We also, for the first time, included patients looking at the molecular subclassifications. So, if there was a P53 mutation and they were stage 1 with myometrial invasion, they were included. And then in all comers, any patients with stage 3 or up to 4a disease, as long as the surgery was for a curative intent, and they had no residual disease after surgery, then they were allowed to enroll into this trial. One of the things is that this is the first time we've done an adjuvant trial this large. I think one of the reasons that helped us succeed in doing a trial like this is that we left radiation as investigator's choice, because a lot of times going into a trial like this, people feel strongly, we know our radiation oncology colleagues, rightfully so, feel that radiation could help prevent disease from coming back. And we also have the camp that says they don't need radiation. We took that question out of this study. We let investigators decide whether or not they're going to get radiation. It was for patients to get chemotherapy, who are going to normally get chemotherapy for their high-risk disease and randomize them to chemotherapy plus placebo or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in order to see if we could prevent the disease from coming back. Dr. Shannon Westin: And the primary results of this study were just presented at ESMO and published in the Annals of Oncology. Can you give us just a quick overview of what that was, what they found? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yep. So, we enrolled 1100 patients. The primary objective of the study was to look at the ITT population, progression free survival and overall survival. And the overall study was negative. Okay, so the hazard ratio in the ITT population was 1.02, not demonstrating a benefit of adding pembrolizumab in this population. I would say disappointing, but at the same point, something that we could really learn a lot from and somewhere that we know that in the whole population, we need to come up with better strategies to help prevent recurrence of disease, better adjuvant treatment strategies. But there's also information that we learned from this trial and that we're reporting on that we're actually super excited about and we feel may be game changing. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah. So, let's go to that. This is the good news. Your manuscript in the JCO, thank goodness you published it here, was focused on that subset of mismatch repair deficient. So, tell us what you found. Dr. Brian Slomovitz: So, in this study, we found that the first stratification factor was dMMR versus pMMR. Now, in the pMMR group, those patients had further stratification factors, but dMMR by itself was a stratification factor. Amongst those patients that had dMMR tumors, we found the hazard ratio to be 0.31 benefiting those patients who received pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting. Really something that when we look at the treatment studies, the GY018s, the RUBYs, the atTEnds, the DUO-Es, in a dMMR setting, we see a similar hazard ratio of 0.3, 0.4. But to get that hazard ratio, which was statistically significant, obviously, is something that we were quite pleased with and something that we felt was worthy of reporting further. I will say it was a pre-specified endpoint. We didn't allocate alpha to it. So, at the beginning, it was a pre-specified endpoint, but at the same time even though we didn't specify alpha towards that outcome, it still, we feel is clinically meaningful and can definitely add to affect the standard of care and the management of these patients. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah. I'm very intrigued to see what kind of people do with this. It makes sense, mechanistically, it makes sense if there was a population that was going to benefit, if not everybody does, this is the group that will. I mean, do you feel like there's enough data? What are you going to do? FDA approval aside, obviously, those kinds of things. But how do you feel about this? Is this something you're going to offer to your patients? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: The first answer is yes. I think it's something that I would like to offer my patients. As you know, we need one of two things: we either need an FDA approval or for a lot of our payers required to be in the NCCN listings. I don't serve on the committee. I have no influence on NCCN. I'm excited to see how they'll respond to not only the Annals article, but obviously in today's release of the JCO article, I hope that they'll look upon it favorably. It's a drug that we're used to giving. Pembrolizumab, we have a lot of experience with it. It's interesting. We didn't see any new safety signals, Shannon. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah, I was going to ask - that's great. Dr. Brian Slomovitz: There was nothing, nothing additional that we found in this trial. So, I feel that it can definitely improve the outcome of those patients, in my view, with high risk for recurrence, treating pembrolizumab in this setting. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah, I think it's important, of course, to look at the safety. What about quality of life? Any new findings there? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yeah, we did that quality of life as part of the phase 3 trial. No difference between the two arms. No difference between the two arms. When we looked at a couple of the other analyses, we found that the benefit is the same on stage 3, 4 tumors. We saw that the benefit was there as well. So, there were less patients in the stage 1, 2 group. But I think really, for all comers, for the patient population, I would definitely consider giving pembrolizumab, again, for those patients with a deficient mismatch repair. Dr. Shannon Westin: It's really exciting, and I think you mentioned some of the statistical limitations. Anything else that gives you pause about the study or things you wish you did better? I know we always like to armchair quarterback ourselves after we do these kinds of studies. Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Yeah, it's interesting. When we designed the study years ago, we used the best information we had at that time to come up with the study design, and we're happy with it, and we really don't think that we could have done it much better. I should say, this was a great partnership that we had here between the GOG, ENGOT and with sponsor Merck, Toon Van Gorp was the lead PI of the global trial. When he gave me the good opportunity to present it at the IGCS and to be the lead author on this, it was really a great partnership. And when we came up with a trial years ago, it was the best trial that we thought at that time. And based on the information now, I think it's really something that we're excited about these results, even though the overall trial was negative. Dr. Shannon Westin: Yeah, I agree with you. I think it's interesting, it's informative to think about, “Well, what would we do now or then if we knew what we knew now?” But still, you design the trial the best way you can. I think the results are super intriguing. I'm hopeful at the way they'll be reviewed. I agree I don't have any inside information about the NCCN committee, but I do hope that they'll consider the overarching data to support immunotherapy and mismatch repair deficiency and the findings of this study. And then I guess the last question I would just ask, as you're an expert here, what are you looking forward to seeing coming next in this space? What's the stuff you're intrigued about in endometrial cancer? Dr. Brian Slomovitz: I think, Shannon, you and I have talked about this for a while. I think we're getting really close to eliminating chemotherapy for some of the patients who suffer from this disease. So, I'm not sure if we'll do a follow up to this trial, but I think a logical type of follow up would be to see: what if we just took away chemotherapy altogether and we did pembro in the adjuvant setting, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy? We don't have that trial in the adjuvant setting, but actually, we completed accrual of that trial in the recurrent setting and we're anxiously awaiting those results. That's KEYNOTE-C93, where in the dMMR population we studied pembrolizumab versus carboplatin paclitaxel. How those results may translate into this setting, I'm not sure. Right now, it's exciting what we have, but yeah. And I think future is bright for this. Just to highlight, in the two arms, there's 140 patients approximately in each arm; there were 25 recurrences in those patients who received placebo. Only eight recurrences in those that received pembrolizumab. Really, when we talk about numbers, it's really remarkable and it shows you the benefit it really had on the patients. Dr. Shannon Westin: Well, this was great. It flew by, as it always does when I'm having conversations with you. I just really want to thank you again for taking the time to share your knowledge with our listeners. Dr. Brian Slomovitz: Thanks, Shannon. Dr. Shannon Westin: And listeners. Thank you all for taking the time to hear about endometrial cancer. Again, this was “Pembrolizumab or Placebo, Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy, With or Without Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed High Risk Endometrial Cancer Results in Mismatch Repair Deficient Tumors.” And this was the JCO After Hours. If you loved what you heard, please check out wherever you get your podcast to see what else we have to offer. Have an awesome day. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.
Dr. Rick Greene discusses with Dr. Dana Dominguez the association of adjuvant chemoradiation in resected biliary cancer with improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, as reported in her article, "Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Resected Biliary Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of SWOG S0809 with a Large National Database.” Article: Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Resected Biliary Adenocarcinoma: Evaluation of SWOG S0809 with a Large National Database | Annals of Surgical Oncology (springer.com)
Do you know the best approaches to managing patients with endometrial cancer in the adjuvant setting? Credit available for this activity expires: 9/24/2025 Earn Credit / Learning Objectives & Disclosures: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/1001649?ecd=bdc_podcast_libsyn_mscpedu
Please visit answersincme.com/RKX860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, an expert in skin cancer discusses strategies for adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable melanoma. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Review the guideline-recommended role of adjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of resectable melanoma; Describe the key adverse events associated with adjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of resectable melanoma; Outline evidence-based, patient centric strategies to optimize the benefit-to-risk impact of adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable melanoma care
Please visit answersincme.com/RKX860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, an expert in skin cancer discusses strategies for adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable melanoma. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Review the guideline-recommended role of adjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of resectable melanoma; Describe the key adverse events associated with adjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of resectable melanoma; Outline evidence-based, patient centric strategies to optimize the benefit-to-risk impact of adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable melanoma care
October 2024 Journal Club Podcast Title: Extended Long-Term Outcome After Conservative Decompressive Microsurgery and Routine Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Cavernous Sinus Meningiomas To read journal article: https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/fulltext/2024/10000/extended_long_term_outcome_after_conservative.14.aspx Authors: Joachim Krauss and Manolis Polemikos Guest faculty: Jacques Morcos Moderator: Jeffrey Traylor Committee Co-chair: Rafael Vega
Did you miss the ESMO Congress 2024? Listen here: NEJM Editor-in-Chief Eric Rubin and NEJM Evidence Associate Editor Oladapo Yeku discuss research that was presented at the 2024 European Society of Medical Oncology annual meeting. Visit NEJM.org to read the latest research.
The fourth episode in the HRT after breast cancer series features Dr. Louise Newson, who has faced criticism for her willingness to prescribe HRT to breast cancer patients. At the same time, she has been described as a lifesaver by many of the women she treats.Dr. Louise Newson is a GP who has transformed the landscape for menopausal women worldwide. She became a member of the Royal College of Physicians in 1998 and a Fellow of the Royal College of GPs in 2016. She is also a menopause specialist and a member of the UK Government's Menopause Taskforce.This mini-series explores hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after breast cancer, a controversial and emotive subject. The conversation focuses on the further understanding of risks and benefits of HRT (hormone replacement therapy) or also MHT (menopause hormone therapy), the emotional impact on patients, and the different views among medical professionals. The goal is to provide understanding for patients seeking HRT after breast cancer and insight for doctors on how to move forward without robust evidence. Dani Binnington, host of the Menopause And Cancer podcast, and founder of the not-for-profit organisation Menopause And Cancer has spoken to hundreds of women who feel like they are in a void and have nowhere to turn to in discussing this difficult topic. Welcome to our HRT after breast cancer series.In this episode we discuss:Dr. Newson's passion for empowering women to navigate the menopause How it felt when Dr. Newson prescribed HRT to a breast cancer patient for the first timeThe role of shared-decision making Holding uncertainty between the doctor and the patientEmpowering women to make informed decisions about their health is crucial in improving their quality of lifeEpisode Highlights:00:00 Intro.03:09 Challenges of hormone replacement therapy after cancer.06:38 Doctor offers hormonal treatment to patient post-surgery.12:00 Alternative options suggested for women's health without HRT.20:45 Adjuvant treatment side effects and drug holidays.23:40 Discussing oestrogen management for cancer survivors post-menopause.30:28 Lack of research on women's health risks.44:04 Advocate for women's health and research needs.47:03 Effective communication between patients and doctors crucial.Connect with us:For more information and resources visit our website: www.menopauseandcancer.org Or follow us on Instagram @menopause_and_cancer Join our Facebook group: www.facebook.com/groups/menopauseandcancerchathubThe walking challenge I mention is here for you: https://move-with-menopause-and-cancer.raiselysite.com/
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/CPD/NCPD/CPE/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WUM865. CME/MOC/CPD/NCPD/CPE/AAPA credit will be available until June 21, 2025.Safeguarding Patients With HR+, HER2-, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer: A Practical Roadmap for CDK4/6 Inhibition in the Adjuvant Setting In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
Raising a big crop requires you to pay attention to the small things that make a difference. Austin Anderson, adjuvant brand manager at Helena, shares his top tips for this year's spray season and talks about the latest product from Helena, Cohort, which is a spray tank partner advancing the use of AMS.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women worldwide, and it can be treated with different modalities, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, hormone therapy and targeted therapy. However, even after the primary treatment, some cancer cells may remain in the body and cause recurrence or metastasis. This is where adjuvant therapies come in: they are additional treatments that aim to reduce the risk of cancer coming back or spreading to other parts of the body.In this episode, Syneos Health colleagues Dr. Juan Manuel Carrera, Senior Medical Director and Lisamarie Burgio, Executive Director, Therapeutic Strategy and Innovation join the podcast to explore the role of adjuvant therapies in breast cancer, with a focus on the latest developments and challenges in this field. They share their extensive experiences and insights from both clinical and operational perspectives, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on the latest genomic information and the evolving landscape of clinical trials, offering a comprehensive view of the strides being made and the challenges that remain. For the latest oncology insights from our experts, check out: Bridging the Gap in Male Breast Cancer Research Through Inclusive Clinical Trial StrategyOncology and the Evolution of Master Clinical Trials | Lessons from the Beat AML Master TrialReadiness Assessment: What Strategies Can You Deploy to Improve Diversity in Your Oncology Trials?Syneos Health Podcast | The Case for Genetic MedicineIs Your NSCLC Asset Ready to Create Value Post-FDA Approval? | 2024 UpdateThe views expressed in this podcast belong solely to the speakers and do not represent those of their organization. If you want access to more future-focused, actionable insights to help biopharmaceutical companies better execute and succeed in a constantly evolving environment, visit the Syneos Health Insights Hub. The perspectives you'll find there are driven by dynamic research and crafted by subject matter experts focused on real answers to help guide decision-making and investment. You can find it all at insightshub.health. Like what you're hearing? Be sure to rate and review us! We want to hear from you! If there's a topic you'd like us to cover on a future episode, contact us at podcast@syneoshealth.com.
Dr. Rachel Freedman and Dr. Sharon Giordano share the latest rapid guideline update from ASCO on the adjuvant use of the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib and ribociclib in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. They share details on the impetus for the update, supporting evidence, and considerations of benefits and harms for individuals. Additionally, Drs. Freedman and Giordano discuss what these options mean for clinicians and patients, and outstanding questions regarding optimal adjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with early breast cancer. Read the full rapid update, “Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer – CDK4/6 Inhibitors: ASCO Rapid Guideline Update” at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines." TRANSCRIPT This guideline, clinical tools, and resources are available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines. Read the full text of the guideline and review authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.24.00886 Brittany Harvey: Hello and welcome to the ASCO Guidelines podcast, one of ASCO's podcasts delivering timely information to keep you up to date on the latest changes, challenges, and advances in oncology. You can find all the shows, including this one at asco.org/podcasts. My name is Brittany Harvey, and today I'm interviewing Dr. Rachel Freedman from Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Dr. Sharon Giordano from MD Anderson Cancer Center, co-chairs on “Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer – CDK 4/6 Inhibitors: ASCO Rapid Guideline Update.” Thank you for being here, Dr. Freedman and Dr. Giordano. Dr. Rachel Freedman: Hi. It's great to be here, thank you. Dr. Sharon Giordano: Yeah, thank you for having us. Brittany Harvey: Great. Then, before we discuss this guideline, I'd like to note that ASCO takes great care in the development of its guidelines and ensuring that the ASCO conflict of interest policy is followed for each guideline. The disclosures of potential conflicts of interest for the guideline panel, including Dr. Freedman and Dr. Giordano, who have joined us here today, are available online with the publication of the guideline in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, which is linked in the show notes. So then, to dive into the content here. First, Dr. Freedman, what prompted this update to the “Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Guideline”, which was previously updated in 2021? Dr. Rachel Freedman: Yeah, at that time, we published guidelines which were part of an amendment to the previously published 2020 early breast cancer guidelines to include consideration of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor use, because the first data for adjuvant abemaciclib became available from the monarchE trial, and because the FDA had acted to grant approval for the use of abemaciclib in those with node positive disease and a Ki-67 score of at least 20%. Our recommendation at that time was to apply abemaciclib in the greater context of the intention-to-treat population included on the monarchE study. But since that time, the FDA in 2023 expanded its approval for adjuvant abemaciclib for a broader population, removing that Ki-67 requirement that was a part of their initial approval. With this change, the recently published longer term data from the monarchE study and the recently published data from the NATALEE trial and adjuvant ribociclib study, we felt that it was time to update our guidelines to be more relevant to the most current data available. Brittany Harvey: I appreciate you providing that background information on the impetus for this latest update. So then, Dr. Giordano, based on this new data, what are the updated recommendations in the latest version of this guideline? Dr. Sharon Giordano: So we really have two updated recommendations and then two qualifying statements that go with the new recommendations. So the first recommendation focuses on the use of adjuvant abemaciclib, which, as Rachel noted, was included in our previous guideline. So this recommendation is that abemaciclib for two years plus endocrine therapy for five or more years may be offered to patients who meet the criteria of the intent-to-treat analysis in the monarchE study. These are patients with resected, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. The way the study defined the high risk of recurrence was having either four or more lymph nodes involved, axillary lymph nodes involved, or having one to three lymph nodes, plus other high risk features, which included having a grade three tumor the size of 5 cm or greater, or having a Ki-67 of more than 20%. And so, although the FDA has dropped the requirement for the Ki-67 testing, and the language is quite broad now, the panel recommends the use of abemaciclib, really in that subgroup of patients that would have been eligible for the original monarchE study. That's the first recommendation, kind of a long one, but that was the update. The second recommendation focuses on the use of adjuvant ribociclib, and this is based on the data from the phase three NATALEE trial that was recently published. This recommendation is that ribociclib for three years plus endocrine therapy, may be offered to patients with stage two or three breast cancer who would have met criteria for study entry and have a high risk of recurrence. I would note with this one, I think it's important to remember that the ribociclib that's used in the adjuvant setting is a different dosing. So it's 400 milligrams daily, three weeks on, one week off, as compared to the 600 milligrams we're using in the metastatic setting. That was the second new recommendation. As I previously mentioned, however, there were two qualifying statements. The first qualifying statement was really the panel wanted to make, because they felt that CDK4/6 therapy in the adjuvant setting may not provide meaningful clinical benefit to every single patient who would have been eligible for these two trials. The concern was especially around lower risk patients. So the early stage two breast cancer patients who were included in the NATALEE trial, and in that situation, the panel felt for some patients, the risks may outweigh the benefits. The challenge here really was that there was not a great way to pick a very specific subgroup of patient that would benefit or wouldn't benefit. So based on that, the panel really recommended taking a broad approach and considering the benefits of therapy, the risks, the costs, and of course, patient preference when making the decision about whether or not to offer these drugs in the adjuvant setting. Then the second qualifying statement was really around how to pick between the two drugs. What the panel stated was that for patients that met the criteria for both studies, they could have been in either monarchE or NATALEE, for those patients, that abemaciclib has longer follow up, has a deepening benefit over time, it's more convenient because it's two years versus three years, and it has FDA approval. So for patients, again, that would have met criteria for either study, the panel favored using abemaciclib, except if patients had some contraindication or intolerance. That is the update, both the recommendations and the qualifying statements in this updated guideline. Brittany Harvey: Understood. Thank you for reviewing both of those recommendations and the nuances between choosing between some of those options as detailed in the qualifying statements. So then, Dr. Freedman, I think Dr. Giordano has talked about this already a little bit, but what should clinicians know as they implement these new recommendations into practice? Dr. Rachel Freedman: Yeah, in the guidelines, as Sharon said, we've really tried to offer recommendations that balance the available efficacy data along with the toxicity data and even some mention of cost consideration, although we purposely can't address that in the guideline. And we just feel that all of these need to be considered in combination for the individual patient. And just like you heard, our panel felt that for those meeting criteria for both the monarchE and NATALEE trials, given all the reasons that Sharon explained, that abemaciclib may be the preferred agent for now, but we all look forward to the evolving data in this space. It's great to have another evidence-based option with ribociclib at this time, but we really acknowledge that longer term follow up will evolve these recommendations further. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. As you mentioned, it's great to have another option in this space. So then, in your view, Dr. Giordano, how will these recommendations impact patients with early breast cancer? Dr. Sharon Giordano: I think that, overall, this is really good news for patients who are at high risk because there's now two new available therapies that they can use to help prevent recurrence. I will note, as we mentioned before, though, they do come with a price, both the cost of the drug and the additional side effects of having two or three years of an additional drug that they're taking. But having said that, I think it's always good to have new options for therapy, and we can discuss these options with the individual patients, weigh the risks and the benefits, and ultimately, we hope with longer follow up, it would be great to see if these drugs would actually improve overall survival, which is ultimately our biggest goal. Brittany Harvey: Definitely, those are key for shared decision making between patients and their clinicians. Then finally, looking forward, Dr. Freedman, what are the outstanding questions regarding the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy for early breast cancer? Dr. Rachel Freedman: Well, there are a lot of outstanding questions with regard to chemotherapy. We have a lot of questions. We still have insufficient data to specify which subgroups, who may have a higher degree of nodal involvement, or what we call anatomical risk, but perhaps a favorable biology or genomics. And we don't know which subgroups still need chemotherapy. And I think this is a group many of us are struggling with in the clinic, is what to do when you have high anatomical risk, but a well behaving cancer, so to speak. And I think that's a burning question for many of us. I still think we have room to improve our adjuvant regimens and figuring out who needs more and who needs less therapy when we are going to move forward with chemotherapy. And we also, with regard to CDK4/6 inhibition, have a lot of ongoing questions. There are a lot of patients who may not benefit from CDK4/6 inhibition as much as others, and the broader population on the NATALEE trial allows us to explore this a little bit, but we're cautious about interpretation of subgroups. But the lowest risk patients on the NATALEE trial may be a group of patients that it's really important to think about when it comes to balancing that toxicity and efficacy risk, as opposed to that higher risk patient where you're sure you want to move ahead. And I think we really await the survival data from both NATALEE and monarchE, neither of which have shown a statistically significant survival advantage to date. We really need ongoing follow up of these studies, and we look forward to learning more in the years to come. Dr. Sharon Giordano: Yeah, I completely agree. It's very well said. I mean, I think one of the biggest challenges, as Rachel said, it's really hard to figure out which subset of patients are truly going to benefit and have the benefit of the drug outweigh the side effects. I hope as we get longer follow up on the studies and additional data come out, we're able to get more information so that we can really give the best therapies to the patients that need it, but also spare patients who don't need it from the additional side effects. Brittany Harvey: Absolutely. We'll await the longer term follow up of these trials and then future updates to these guidelines. So I want to thank you so much for your work to rapidly update this breast cancer guideline. And thank you so much for your time today, Dr. Giordano and Dr. Freedman. Dr. Rachel Freedman: Thanks so much. Dr. Sharon Giordano: Yeah, thank you very much, our pleasure. Brittany Harvey: And thank you to all of our listeners for tuning in to the ASCO Guidelines podcast. To read the full rapid recommendation update, go to www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines. You can also find many of our guidelines and interactive resources in the free ASCO Guidelines app, available in the Apple App Store or the Google Play Store. If you have enjoyed what you've heard today, please rate and review the podcast and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.
Lots of recent updates to cover this week... 1. Adjuvant pembrolizumab of RCC demonstrates OS improvement in NEJM publication (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312695) 2. Yet adjuvant nivolumab did not demonstrate OS improvement in the adjuvant setting. There may be a few reasons for this (https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.LBA358) 3. A cytokine-fusion protein, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept, is approved for intravesicular use in BCG-unresponsive bladder cancer. This agent appears to activity in NSCLC too... 4. The Phase II APPLE trial provides some evidence than deferring osimertinib to the second-line setting in metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC may yield similar OS to first-line use of osimertinib. (https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01521) 5.The METALLICA study provides a nice roadmap for empiric metformin use when starting alpelisib (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102520) 6. Does CPX-351 cause less intestinal damage than 7 + 3? And could that explain the discordance between time of neutropenia and infection rates? A mouse model suggests yes. (https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.77.6112)
In this second part, Matt Galski describes the OS signal data. We also look into the future.
Recent research reveals just how effectively probiotics improve inflammation, cognition, and depression. Tune in to hear the details of the latest in health science. Watch/Read Next… Can You Use Probiotics for Brain Health: https://drruscio.com/probiotics-for-brain-health/ What are the Signs You Need Probiotics? https://drruscio.com/what-are-the-signs-you-need-probiotics/ The Best Probiotics Protocol? The Triple Therapy Approach: https://drruscio.com/triple-therapy-probiotic-protocol/ The Best Probiotics for Anxiety & How to Use Them: https://drruscio.com/best-probiotic-for-anxiety/ Depression is More Than Serotonin. So What is it? https://drruscio.com/serotonin-theory-of-depression/ How to Improve Depression & Anxiety Without Medication: https://drruscio.com/natural-mood-enhancers/ Leaky Gut Supplements to Target Inflammation: https://drruscio.com/leakygut-supplements/ Reduce Stress Inflammation in 5 Steps: https://drruscio.com/reduce-stress-inflammation/ How to Reduce Brain Inflammation: 4 Actions You Can Take Today: https://drruscio.com/reduce-brain-inflammation/ Timestamps 00:00 Intro 00:42 How to Determine Evidence Quality 02:52 The Science Behind Depression is Evolving 05:52 “Microbiota Diversity as a New Target to Improve Mood” 08:05 The Effect of Probiotics & Fiber in Cognitive Function 10:50 Probiotics for Premature Infant Neurodevelopment 13:12 Probiotics for Alcohol Use Disorder 14:40 Probiotics for Inflammation 17:48 Probiotics for MS 19:22 “Probiotic Effects on Sexual Function in Depressant Women” Featured Studies Microbiota Diversity and Inflammation as a New Target to Improve Mood: Probiotic Use in Depressive Disorder: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37800206/ The effect and safety of probiotics on depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37247076/ Effect of Continuous Ingestion of Bifidobacteria and Dietary Fiber on Improvement in Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37836458/ Probiotic supplements are effective in people with cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36629438/ Effectiveness of a probiotic combination on the neurodevelopment of the very premature infant: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37365274/ The Beneficial Effects of Lactobacillus GG Therapy on Liver and Drinking Assessments in Patients with Moderate Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37040544/ The role of probiotic supplementation in inflammatory biomarkers in adults: an umbrella meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37698776/ The effect of probiotic supplementation on the clinical and para-clinical findings of multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37903945/ Effects of Microecological Regulators on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36904103/ Adjuvant administration of probiotic effects on sexual function in depressant women undergoing SSRIs treatment: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38216917/ Get the Latest Updates Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/DrRusciodc Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/drrusciodc/ Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/drmichaelrusciodc DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider before starting any new treatment or discontinuing an existing treatment. Music featured in this video: "Modern Technology" by Andrew G, https://audiojungle.net/user/andrew_g *Full transcript available on YouTube by clicking the “Show transcript” button on the bottom right of the video.
Learn practical tips for the inpatient management of patients with sickle cell disease and vaso-occlusive crisis from guest, Dr. Yoo Mee Shin (Emory). We cover acute pain management including adjuvant therapies, IV fluids, oxygen therapy, the management of acute chest syndrome, and when to perform simple vs exchange transfusions. Key takeaways include the importance of early triage and analgesia, addressing misconceptions about opioid use disorder in patients with sickle cell disease, and recognizing complications of vaso-occlusive crises. Claim CME for this episode at curbsiders.vcuhealth.org! Patreon | Episodes | Subscribe | Spotify | YouTube | Newsletter | Contact | Swag! | CME Show Segments 00:00 Intro 01:27 Getting to know our guest 07:48 Case Presentation and Initial Management of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) 13:46 Misconceptions about opioid use disorder and sickle cell 17:02 Management of Acute Pain in Sickle Cell Disease 25:46 Adjuvant therapy for pain 29:04 Transition to outpatient care 32:46 General admission orders for sickle cell 38:44 Management of Acute Chest Syndrome 42:01 Simple vs exchange transfusion 47:08 Transfusion in preoperative and pregnant patients 48:03 Transitions and follow-up care 49:35 Key takeaways and Outro Credits Written and Produced by: Matthew Watto MD, FACP Cover Art & Infographic: Matthew Watto MD, FACP Hosts: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP Reviewer: Emi Okamoto MD Showrunners: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP Technical Production: PodPaste Guest: Yoo Mee Shin MD Sponsor: Green Chef Go to greenchef.com/60curb and use code 60curb to get 60% off, plus 20% off your next two months. Sponsor: NetSuite Download NetSuite's popular KPI Checklist, designed to give you consistently excellent performance -absolutely free, at NetSuite.com/CURBSIDERS
Anesthesia and Critical Care Reviews and Commentary (ACCRAC) Podcast
In this 270th episode I welcome Drs. Michael Douglas and Leonard Soloniuk to the show to discuss the use of dexmedetomidine in spinals, epidurals and nerve blocks. Our Sponsors:* Check out Magic Mind and use my code ACC20 for a great deal: https://www.magicmind.com/Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
