Podcasts about philosophy workshop

In this episode, we comment on one of the latest events held at the IDEA Centre, the AI and Philosophy Workshop. Postgraduate Researcher Gabriela Arriagada Bruneau speaks with Zach Gudmunsen, fellow co-organiser of the event and Michael Cannon, co-author of one of the presented papers. This episode covers different talks in the workshop, dividing them into two themes:Theory: Dr David Strohmaier - "Ontology, neural networks, and the social sciences"Professor Vincent C. Müller - "Orthogonality and Existential Risk from AIDr Ioannis Votsis - "Machine‐Made Jabberwocky?"Practice:Professor David Hogg - "AI and Common sense"Dr Paula Boddington - "Philosophy of AI through the theory and practice of dementia"Professor John McDermid - "Embodied AI: Autonomous Systems and Ethics"We finish by commenting on the Future challenges for the development of AI.Released 30 March 2021. Presented by Gabriela Arriagada BruneauEthics Untangled is produced by the IDEA Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.Twitter: @EthicsUntangledFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetlLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idea-ethics-centre/

My guests this week are Jennifer Foster (@philoso_foster), a philosophy Ph.D. student at the University of Southern California, and Cassie Finley (@Angry_Cassie), a philosophy Ph.D. student at the University of Iowa. They’ve come together to organize the Cogtweeto Philosophy Workshop Series. We discuss the workshop and community organizing within philosophy twitter.Cogtweeto conference info: https://www.cogtweeto.com/Daily Nous writeup: https://dailynous.com/2021/01/06/new-workshop-series-bring-philosophy-philosophy-twitter/Convocation: Amber NaslundEditing by Lu Lyons, check out her amazing podcast Filmed Live Musicals! http://www.filmedlivemusicals.com/podcast.htmlMusic by GW RodriguezSibling Pod Philosophers in Space: https://0gphilosophy.libsyn.com/Support us at Patreon.com/EmbraceTheVoidIf you enjoy the show, please Like and Review us on your pod app, especially iTunes. It really helps!If you enjoyed this and want to discuss more, start a conversation with me here: https://letter.wiki/AaronRabinowitz/conversationsRecent Appearances: Aaron was recently on Cog Dis to talk Monster Island. Show some cult love! https://dissonancepod.libsyn.com/episode-547-aaron-rabinowitz-v4c-2019-part-9?tdest_id=124104Next week: Social media conspiracies with Ami Palmer

In this episode I discuss the nature of skepticism, it's history and applications for us today with Professor Henrik Lagerlund. "Henrik Lagerlund was previously Professor of Philosophy and Head of the Philosophy Department at the University of Western Ontario in Canada. He works on the history of philosophy; primarily on Medieval and Renaissance philosophy, but he has also written on Aristotle and Leibniz. He is at the moment writing a history of skepticism for Routledge. Another interest is the philosophy of food (see https://blog.apaonline.org/2017/12/07...). At the Stockholm Department, he will among other things be running the Stockholm History of Philosophy Workshop - a new seminar series that will feature invited speakers in all areas of the history of philosophy." (https://www.su.se/english/profiles/hl...) Prof. Lagerlunds most recent book on skepticism can be found at : https://www.routledge.com/Skepticism-... He can also be found on twitter: @HenrikLagerlund

This discussion was held June 16th, 2018 with the final 4 speakers of the annual Newburgh Summer Philosophy Workshop.

This panel discussion was held with the first 6 speakers from annual Newburgh Philosophy Workshop on June 15th, 2018.

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. The Philosophy of Religions Workshop, the Literature & Philosophy Workshop and the Religion & Literature Club present Professor Amy Hollywood speaking about material from her forthcoming book, “Acute Melancholia and Other Essays: On Mysticism, Historiography, and the Study of Religion.” Professor Hollywood is the author of “The Soul as Virgin Wife: Mechthild of Magdeburg, Marguerite Porete, and Meister Eckhart” (University of Notre Dame Press, 1995), which received the Otto Grundler Prize for the best book in medieval studies from the International Congress of Medieval Studies, and “Sensible Ecstasy: Mysticism, Sexual Difference, and the Demands of History” (University of Chicago Press, 2002). She is also the co-editor,with Patricia Beckman, of The Cambridge Companion to Christian Mysticism (2012).

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. The Philosophy of Religions Workshop, the Literature & Philosophy Workshop and the Religion & Literature Club present Professor Amy Hollywood speaking about material from her forthcoming book, “Acute Melancholia and Other Essays: On Mysticism, Historiography, and the Study of Religion.” Professor Hollywood is the author of “The Soul as Virgin Wife: Mechthild of Magdeburg, Marguerite Porete, and Meister Eckhart” (University of Notre Dame Press, 1995), which received the Otto Grundler Prize for the best book in medieval studies from the International Congress of Medieval Studies, and “Sensible Ecstasy: Mysticism, Sexual Difference, and the Demands of History” (University of Chicago Press, 2002). She is also the co-editor,with Patricia Beckman, of The Cambridge Companion to Christian Mysticism (2012).

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/

If you experience any technical difficulties with this video or would like to make an accessibility-related request, please send a message to digicomm@uchicago.edu. Torture, Law, and War: What are the moral and legal boundaries on the use of coercion in interrogation?a conference atThe University of Chicago Law SchoolFebruary 29-March 1, 2008Recent events combined with shifts in government policy have reopened questions about how much and what kinds of coercion are appropriately used in the interrogation and detention of suspected criminals, enemy combatants, and accomplices. For the sake of protecting security and pursuing justice, some have urged we reexamine the usefulness and broad prohibitions of torture. Yet some basic questions about torture and coercive interrogation in particular are also in need of answer: How should we define torture? What can we learn from history about it? What are its effects on the tortured, on those who torture, and on societies in which it occurs? What should the law say about it?In conjunction with the University of Chicago Law School"i? 1/2 s year-long Law and Philosophy Workshop focused on coercion, the Law School is hosting a conference to draw speakers from a variety of disciplines together to discuss these and related questions.For a full schedule of talks and complete list of contributors, please visit http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/conferences/torturelawwar/