Podcasts about university writing

This episode features Michaela Goade, illustrator of children's book We Are Water Protectors, and Amanda Rzicznek, BGSU teaching professor of courses in University Writing, graphic narratives, and literature for children and young adults at BGSU. Our guests discuss the importance and purpose of illustration in children's literature, and how artistic choices shape readers' experiences. Listeners can keep up with ICS happenings by following us on Twitter and Instagram @icsbgsu and on our Facebook page. You can listen to BG Ideas wherever you find your favorite podcast. Please subscribe and rate us on your preferred platform. For more information, visit bgsu.edu/bgideas. This episode was sound edited by DeAnna MacKeigan and Marco Mendoza. Research assistance was provided by Branson Young, with editing by Kari Hanlin. To access the transcript for this episode, use the following link: https://bit.ly/3CagqPX

Today we take a peek inside the lives of peer tutors Mekenzie McElroy and Lindsey Wright, both undergraduates at UCF, who work in the University Writing Center. They also recently presented on a panel at the Southeastern Writing Center Association Conference. This conversation offers us a student oriented perspective of what brought them into their roles and what it means to be a contributing member of the UWC, in their tutoring sessions as well as their research.  #UCF #UCFUWC #SWCA2022 #WritingAndRhetoric

In the episode TX512 Host Sam Torres talks reading, writing, piano, and pursuing passions with Dr. Kristin Gilger, Graduate Services Coordinator in the University Writing Center. Dr. Gilger plans graduate writing retreats, writing groups, and workshops, teaches the Dissertation Summer Boot Camp, and works on building a supportive writing community for graduate students across disciplines. Learn more about the writing center by visiting https://uwc.utexas.edu

On this episode, Katie is joined by Asao B. Inoue, Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Director of University Writing and the Writing Center at the University of Washington Tacoma, a member of the Executive Board of Council of Writing Program Administrators, and the Program Chair of the 2018 Conference on College Composition and Communication. Among his many articles and chapters on writing assessment and race and racism, his article, “Theorizing Failure in U.S. Writing Assessments” in RTE, won the 2014 CWPA Outstanding Scholarship Award. His co-edited collection, Race and Writing Assessment (2012), won the 2014 NCTE/CCCC Outstanding Book Award for an edited collection. His book, Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing for a Socially Just Future (2015) won the 2017 NCTE/CCCC Outstanding Book Award for a monograph and the 2015 CWPA Outstanding Book Award. In November of 2016, he guested co-edited a special issue of College English on writing assessment as social justice, and is currently finishing a co-edited collection on the same topic, as well as a book on labor-based grading contracts as socially just writing assessment. Segment 1: Alternative Modes of Writing Assessment [00:00-14:17] In this first segment, Asao shares about his research and experience with grade-less writing and grading contracts. In this segment, the following resources are mentioned: Inoue, A. B. (2014). Theorizing failure in U.S. writing assessments. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(3), 330-352. Inoue, A. B., & Poe, M. (Eds.). (2012). Race and writing assessment. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. Inoue, A. B. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing for a socially just future. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press. College English Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Selected works of Peter Elbow Segment 2: Writing Assessment as Anti-racist Practice [14:18-32:31] In segment two, Asao discusses his research on writing assessment as anti-racist practice. To share feedback about this podcast episode, ask questions that could be featured in a future episode, or to share research-related resources, post a comment below or contact the “Research in Action” podcast: Twitter: @RIA_podcast or #RIA_podcast Email: riapodcast@oregonstate.edu Voicemail: 541-737-1111 If you listen to the podcast via iTunes, please consider leaving us a review. The views expressed by guests on the Research in Action podcast do not necessarily represent the views of Ecampus or Oregon State University.

On this episode, Katie is joined by Asao B. Inoue, Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Director of University Writing and the Writing Center at the University of Washington Tacoma, a member of the Executive Board of Council of Writing Program Administrators, and the Program Chair of the 2018 Conference on College Composition and Communication. Among his many articles and chapters on writing assessment and race and racism, his article, "Theorizing Failure in U.S. Writing Assessments" in RTE, won the 2014 CWPA Outstanding Scholarship Award. His co-edited collection, Race and Writing Assessment (2012), won the 2014 NCTE/CCCC Outstanding Book Award for an edited collection. His book, Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing for a Socially Just Future (2015) won the 2017 NCTE/CCCC Outstanding Book Award for a monograph and the 2015 CWPA Outstanding Book Award. In November of 2016, he guested co-edited a special issue of College English on writing assessment as social justice, and is currently finishing a co-edited collection on the same topic, as well as a book on labor-based grading contracts as socially just writing assessment. Segment 1: Alternative Modes of Writing Assessment [00:00-14:17] In this first segment, Asao shares about his research and experience with grade-less writing and grading contracts. Segment 2: Writing Assessment as Anti-racist Practice [14:18-32:31] In segment two, Asao discusses his research on writing assessment as anti-racist practice. Bonus Clip #1 [00:00-05:03]: The Relationship Between Language and Race To share feedback about this podcast episode, ask questions that could be featured in a future episode, or to share research-related resources, contact the “Research in Action” podcast: Twitter: @RIA_podcast or #RIA_podcast Email: riapodcast@oregonstate.edu Voicemail: 541-737-1111 If you listen to the podcast via iTunes, please consider leaving us a review. The views expressed by guests on the Research in Action podcast do not necessarily represent the views of Ecampus or Oregon State University.

How to adduce evidence. Two types of evidence: text references and examples/comparisons, based on your own observation and analysis. Vocab to avoid (e.g. 'I feel', 'in my opinion'), and why. How to use quotations.

How to adduce evidence. Two types of evidence: text references and examples/comparisons, based on your own observation and analysis. Vocab to avoid (e.g. 'I feel', 'in my opinion'), and why. How to use quotations.