Podcast appearances and mentions of julian reiss

Die AGPP möchte Sie auf folgende Ausschreibung aufmerksam machen:"Fipsi reads your thoughts"Wir von Fipsi, dem philosophisch-psychologischen Podcast wollen in noch intensiveren Austausch mit Ihnen treten. Zu diesem Zweck werden wir ein neuartiges Episodenformat einführen, in dem wir Ihre Gedanken diskutieren. Die Idee dabei ist einfach: Senden Sie uns einen kurzen Text (3000-5000 Zeichen inkl. Leerzeichen) zu einem der folgenden Themen bis zum 30.06.2021 per Mail an fipsi@phi-psy.de:1. Sind Gefühle Verhaltensweisen?2. Gibt es ein Erlebnis der Seele?3. Ist alles Psychische bewusst?4. Was ist der philosophische Gehalt der Gestaltpsychologie?5. Wie kann der (Neuro-)Kognitivismus die phänomenologische Kritik überwinden?Wir diskutieren Ihre Zusendungen bei Fipsi - gerne auch zu Dritt mit dem Autor oder der Autorin (frei nach Ihrer Präferenz).Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Zusendungen und wünschen viel Mut und gutes Gelingen,Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt---Die 19. Folge des Podcasts Fipsi, der als erster seiner Art den Dialog zwischen Philosophie und Psychologie anstrebt. In dieser Episode diskutieren Hannes Wendler und Alexander Wendt zusammen mit Stefan Radev über Frage danach, was sich simulieren lässt. Dabei berücksichtigen sie insbesondere die den Zusammenhang von Computerwissenschaften, Philosophie und Psychologie und kommen unter anderem auf Roman Frigg, Julian Reiss und Nick Bostrom zu sprechen.Auf YouTube finden Sie alle Episoden von Fipsi unter https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpIT6jK3mKTiQcXbinapKRbf39mLEpKWmAuf Spotify finden Sie Fipsi unter https://open.spotify.com/show/0il832RRDoPZPaNlC7vams?si=lr1fcWUWQFeO-S6Bsxsq-g&dl_branch=1Die Website der Arbeitsgemeinschaft: https://www.phi-psy.deMelden Sie sich mit Rückmeldungen und Anmerkungen gerne unter fipsi@phi-psy.deDiskutieren Sie mit uns auf Telegram: https://t.me/FipsiPPP oder https://t.me/PhiundPsyFür das Intro bedanken wir uns bei Estella und Peter: https://www.instagram.com/elpetera

Whether in hospital, in economic consulting or in the design of learning environments, the people involved must constantly make decisions that have a considerable impact on the individual, institutional or social level of interaction. The concept of "evidence based practice" builds upon the notion that important decisions should not be made exclusively on the basis of personal experience and subjective assessments or needs. The best scientific evidence currently available should be considered. Julian Reiss is professor of Philosophy at Durham University.

Whether in hospital, in economic consulting or in the design of learning environments, the people involved must constantly make decisions that have a considerable impact on the individual, institutional or social level of interaction. The concept of "evidence based practice" builds upon the notion that important decisions should not be made exclusively on the basis of personal experience and subjective assessments or needs. The best scientific evidence currently available should be considered. Julian Reiss is professor of Philosophy at Durham University.

What do we mean when we claim that something is a cause of something else that smoking causes cancer, that the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand caused World War I, that the 8-ball caused the other billiard ball to go into the side pocket? In Causation, Evidence, and Inference (Routledge 2015), Julian Reiss defends an inferentialist account in which causal claims are inferred from evidence for a hypothesis and are the basis of inferences to other consequences. Reiss, who is Professor of Philosophy at Durham University, argues that causal claims depend on contextual factors, such as background knowledge and the purpose for making the claim, and that such claims are pluralistic due to the variety of kinds of evidence from which they can be inferred. Focusing on causal claims in the biomedical and social sciences, he provides a critical overview of prominent theories of causation and evidence, and argues that his view can overcome many of the problems that have been raised for these views. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

What do we mean when we claim that something is a cause of something else that smoking causes cancer, that the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand caused World War I, that the 8-ball caused the other billiard ball to go into the side pocket? In Causation, Evidence, and Inference (Routledge 2015), Julian Reiss defends an inferentialist account in which causal claims are inferred from evidence for a hypothesis and are the basis of inferences to other consequences. Reiss, who is Professor of Philosophy at Durham University, argues that causal claims depend on contextual factors, such as background knowledge and the purpose for making the claim, and that such claims are pluralistic due to the variety of kinds of evidence from which they can be inferred. Focusing on causal claims in the biomedical and social sciences, he provides a critical overview of prominent theories of causation and evidence, and argues that his view can overcome many of the problems that have been raised for these views. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices