Connecting to Apple Music.
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
October 22, 2014 Sponsor Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Speaker Information Kevin Barnes, Jim Wooley, Colin Jennings, Timothy Webster
October 2, 2014 "How the Separation of Powers Informs the Executive Duty to Defend the Law" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Judge William H. Pryor Jr. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
September 22, 2104 "Litigating Sexual Abuse!" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Jeff Herman is noted for exposing the clergy sexual abuse scandal in the Archdiocese of Miami and in dioceses around the country. In 2011, he won a landmark $100 million verdict on behalf of a client who was sexually abused by a priest.
September 12, 2014 "Marijuana, Federal Power, and the States - Part 1" Case Western Reserve University School of Law In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law. Several other states allow the possession and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and others appear ready to follow suit. Yet marijuana remains illegal under federal law. The federal governmental has not sought to preempt these decisions, and has outlined a new enforcement policy that largely defers to state law enforcement. Nonetheless, the conflict between federal and state laws creates legal difficulty for business owners, financial institutions, and local law enforcement. Is this dual regime sustainable? Should the federal government defer to state electorates on marijuana policies? Is drug policy best made at the federal or state level? How should principles of federalism inform the federal government’s response to state initiatives on marijuana? Prominent academics will consider these and related questions raised by state-level marijuana policy reforms.
September 12, 2014 "Marijuana, Federal Power, and the States - Part 2" Case Western Reserve University School of Law In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law. Several other states allow the possession and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and others appear ready to follow suit. Yet marijuana remains illegal under federal law. The federal governmental has not sought to preempt these decisions, and has outlined a new enforcement policy that largely defers to state law enforcement. Nonetheless, the conflict between federal and state laws creates legal difficulty for business owners, financial institutions, and local law enforcement. Is this dual regime sustainable? Should the federal government defer to state electorates on marijuana policies? Is drug policy best made at the federal or state level? How should principles of federalism inform the federal government’s response to state initiatives on marijuana? Prominent academics will consider these and related questions raised by state-level marijuana policy reforms.
September 12, 2014 "Marijuana, Federal Power, and the States - Part 3" Case Western Reserve University School of Law In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law. Several other states allow the possession and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and others appear ready to follow suit. Yet marijuana remains illegal under federal law. The federal governmental has not sought to preempt these decisions, and has outlined a new enforcement policy that largely defers to state law enforcement. Nonetheless, the conflict between federal and state laws creates legal difficulty for business owners, financial institutions, and local law enforcement. Is this dual regime sustainable? Should the federal government defer to state electorates on marijuana policies? Is drug policy best made at the federal or state level? How should principles of federalism inform the federal government’s response to state initiatives on marijuana? Prominent academics will consider these and related questions raised by state-level marijuana policy reforms.
September 12, 2014 "Marijuana, Federal Power, and the States - Part 4" Case Western Reserve University School of Law In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law. Several other states allow the possession and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and others appear ready to follow suit. Yet marijuana remains illegal under federal law. The federal governmental has not sought to preempt these decisions, and has outlined a new enforcement policy that largely defers to state law enforcement. Nonetheless, the conflict between federal and state laws creates legal difficulty for business owners, financial institutions, and local law enforcement. Is this dual regime sustainable? Should the federal government defer to state electorates on marijuana policies? Is drug policy best made at the federal or state level? How should principles of federalism inform the federal government’s response to state initiatives on marijuana? Prominent academics will consider these and related questions raised by state-level marijuana policy reforms.
September 10, 2014 "The Hobby Lobby Decision: Its Effect on Reproductive Rights and Judicial Precedent" Case Western Reserve University School of Law The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby found that the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception contravene the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in some circumstances. The Court’s decision was largely split along gender lines. It exempts closely held for-profit corporations from the Affordable Care Act’s birth control coverage mandate if facilitating access to contraception would violate their sincerely held religious beliefs. This panel discussion will analyze the Hobby Lobby decision and the questions it has raised regarding the balance between a woman’s reproductive freedom and a corporation’s right to religious freedom. This lecture will be of interest to any Ohio attorney who represents corporations and small businesses that provide health insurance for employees or represents employees enrolled in health care plans.
September 5, 2014 "International Regulation of Emerging Military Technologies - Part 1" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Consortium on Emerging Military Technologies, Military Operations, and National Security (CETMONS), Directed by Maxwell J. Mehlman. Frederick K. Cox International Law Center, Directed by co-Interim Dean Michael Scharf. Co-sponsored by Center for Cyberspace Law & Policy and the Inamori International Center for Ethics and Excellence.
September 5, 2014 "International Regulation of Emerging Military Technologies - Part 2" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Consortium on Emerging Military Technologies, Military Operations, and National Security (CETMONS), Directed by Maxwell J. Mehlman. Frederick K. Cox International Law Center, Directed by co-Interim Dean Michael Scharf. Co-sponsored by Center for Cyberspace Law & Policy and the Inamori International Center for Ethics and Excellence.
September 5, 2014 "International Regulation of Emerging Military Technologies - Part 3" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Consortium on Emerging Military Technologies, Military Operations, and National Security (CETMONS), Directed by Maxwell J. Mehlman. Frederick K. Cox International Law Center, Directed by co-Interim Dean Michael Scharf. Co-sponsored by Center for Cyberspace Law & Policy and the Inamori International Center for Ethics and Excellence.
September 5, 2014 "International Regulation of Emerging Military Technologies - Part 4" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Consortium on Emerging Military Technologies, Military Operations, and National Security (CETMONS), Directed by Maxwell J. Mehlman. Frederick K. Cox International Law Center, Directed by co-Interim Dean Michael Scharf. Co-sponsored by Center for Cyberspace Law & Policy and the Inamori International Center for Ethics and Excellence.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
