Frederick K Cox podcast appearances and mentions

Tackling the Human Rights Implications of the Disposal of Toxic Wastes

2015-2016 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 17, 2016 60:08

February 17, 2016 "Tackling the Human Rights Implications of the Disposal of Toxic Wastes" Case Western Reserve University School of Law Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Speaker: Baskut Tuncak Special Rapporteur on Toxic Waste and Human Rights United Nations Summary: The lecture addresses specific legal and human rights issues related to vulnerable populations, including children, women and workers, who are particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of hazardous substances and wastes. The lecture is be beneficial for governmental attorneys, legislators, policy makers, litigators, corporate attorneys, and labor lawyers.

toxic tackling implications human rights case western reserve university disposal wastes toxic waste frederick k cox

Probes and Bribes: Practioners’ Perspectives on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

2014-2015 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 21, 2015 80:07

October 22, 2014 Sponsor Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Speaker Information Kevin Barnes, Jim Wooley, Colin Jennings, Timothy Webster

perspectives bribes probes foreign corrupt practices act frederick k cox

Lawfare: Lawfare and the Israeli-Palestine Predicament (Panel 4)

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 75:27

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Moderator: Prof. Milena Sterio, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University Speakers: Prof. William Schabas, Irish Centre for Human Rights, National University of Ireland, Galway Prof. William J. Aceves, associate dean, California Western School of Law Prof. Laurie Blank, Director, International Humanitarian Law Clinic, Emory University School of Law Prof. Michael Newton, Vanderbilt University Law School Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

director israel law ireland panel israelis human rights al qaeda national university guantanamo bay predicament lawfare emory university school william j michael newton aceves california western school israeli palestine irish centre cleveland marshall college international criminal tribunals frederick k cox

Lawfare: Lawfare and War Crimes Tribunals (Panel 3)

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 98:37

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Moderator: Prof. Michael Kelly Speakers: Hon. James Ogoola, Principal Judge, Ugandan High Court Robert Petit, former International Prosecutor, Cambodia Tribunal, Counsel, War Crimes Section, Federal Department of Justice, Canada Prof. David Crane, founding Prosecutor, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Syracuse University College of Law Prof. Jens Meierhenrich, London School of Economics & Political Science, author, Lawfare: The Formation and Deformation of Gacaca Jurisdictions in Rwanda Amb. David Scheffer, Northwestern University School of Law, former U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

law economics large ambassadors panel political science counsel london school al qaeda prosecutors tribunal sierra leone war crimes guantanamo bay lawfare david crane northwestern university school deformation syracuse university college special court international criminal tribunals david scheffer frederick k cox

Lawfare: Is "Lawfare" a Useful Term? (Panel 2)

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 72:05

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Moderator: Daniel Moulthrop, Executive Director, "The Civic Commons," former producer/host, WCPN 90.3 FM ideastream (NPR Cleveland) Speakers: Pro: Major General Charles Dunlap, Jr., Deputy Judge Advocate General, U.S. Air Force Prof. Paul Williams, American University, Exec. Dir., Public International Law and Policy Group Con: Scott Horton, Contributing Editor, Harpers Magazine, Lecturer, Columbia Law School Prof. Leila Nadya Sadat, Washington University School of Law (St. Louis) Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

executive director panel lecturer exec american university al qaeda guantanamo bay paul williams contributing editor lawfare washington university school public international law harper's magazine international criminal tribunals civic commons frederick k cox

Lawfare: Historical and Semiotic Origins of "Lawfare" (Panel 1)

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 34:03

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Moderator: Prof. Tawia Ansah, Visiting Professor, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Speakers: Prof. Wouter Werner, VU University, Amsterdam Prof. Susan Tiefenbrun, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

origins panel historical al qaeda visiting professor case western reserve university guantanamo bay lawfare thomas jefferson school semiotic vu university international criminal tribunals frederick k cox

Lawfare: Introduction

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 13:47

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Speakers: Dean Robert Rawson, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Prof. Michael Scharf, director, Cox Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Prof. Michael Kelly, president, AIDP, Creighton University School of Law Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

al qaeda case western reserve university guantanamo bay lawfare michael kelly creighton university school aidp international criminal tribunals michael scharf frederick k cox

Lawfare: Lawfare and the War on Terror (Panel 5)

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Play Episode Listen Later May 23, 2014 89:02

September 10, 2010 War Crimes Research Symposium Frederick K. Cox International Law Center Case Western Reserve University School of Law Moderator: Prof. Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Speakers: Prof. Melissa Waters, Washington University School of Law (St. Louis) Sandy Hodgkinson, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs, U.S. Dept. of Defense Prof. David Frakt, former Lead Defense Counsel, Military Commissions, Guantanamo Bay, Barry University School of Law Michael Lebowitz, Prosecutor, Office of Military Commissions, Guantanamo Bay Closing Remarks: Prof. Shannon French, Ph.D., director, Inamori International Center for Excellence & Ethics Case Western Reserve University Summary: Traditionally "Lawfare" was defined as "a strategy of using—or misusing—law as a substitute for traditional military means to achieve an operational objective." But lately, commentators and governments have applied the concept to International Criminal Tribunals, the defense counsel's tactics challenging the detention of al Qaeda suspects in Guantanamo Bay, and as indicated in the quote above to the controversial Goldstone Commission Report. This symposium and Experts Meeting, featuring two-dozen leading academics, practitioners, and former government officials from all sides of the political spectrum, will examine the usefulness and appropriate application of the "Lawfare" concept.

office defense excellence panel al qaeda prosecutors war on terror case western reserve university guantanamo bay lawfare deputy assistant secretary washington university school jonathan adler barry university school international criminal tribunals shannon french frederick k cox

Podcast appearances and mentions of Frederick K Cox

Best podcasts about Frederick K Cox

2011-2012 School of Law Lecture Series

2012-2013 School of Law Lecture Series

2013-2014 School of Law Lecture Series

2010-2011 School of Law Lecture Series

Latest podcast episodes about Frederick K Cox

Tackling the Human Rights Implications of the Disposal of Toxic Wastes

Probes and Bribes: Practioners’ Perspectives on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Lawfare: Lawfare and the Israeli-Palestine Predicament (Panel 4)

Lawfare: Lawfare and War Crimes Tribunals (Panel 3)

Lawfare: Is "Lawfare" a Useful Term? (Panel 2)

Lawfare: Historical and Semiotic Origins of "Lawfare" (Panel 1)

Lawfare: Introduction

Lawfare: Lawfare and the War on Terror (Panel 5)

Preventing the Financing of Terrorism - Lecture II

Preventing the Financing of Terrorism - Lecture & Panel I

Preventing the Financing of Terrorism - Introduction

How the Cleveland Bar Became Segregated: And Why It Matters

Victims before International Criminals Courts: A Challenge for International Criminal Justice

9/11: A Ten Year Retrospective on Law and the War on Terrorism

International Law in Crisis - International Economic Law in Crisis or Merely in Times of Crisis? (Panel 1B)

International Law in Crisis - Climate Change - What does Hope Look Like? (Panel 2B)

International Law in Crisis - International Law and the War on Terror: A Ten-Year Retrospective (Final Panel)

International Law in Crisis - Main Lecture

International Law in Crisis - Northern Africa and the Mideast: To Where? (Panel 3A)

International Law in Crisis - Crisis in the Courtrooms: International Law and Domestic Litigation (Panel 3B)

International Law in Crisis - Piracy: New Threats, New Responses (Panel 2A)

International Law in Crisis - Universal Jurisdiction in Crisis and the 50th anniversary of the Eichmann Trial (Panel 1A)

International Law in Crisis - Opening Lecture

International Law in Crisis - Introduction

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Panel 5

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Panel 4

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Panel 3

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Panel 1

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Keynote Address

Presidential Power, Foreign Affairs, and the 2012 Election - Panel 2

Reflections from the International Criminal Court Prosecutor

Eroding the Foundations of International Humanitarian Law: The United States Post-9/11

A Conversation with the Chief Prosecutor of United States Military Commissions

End Game! An International Conference on Combating Piracy Part 5

End Game! An International Conference on Combating Piracy Part 4

End Game! An International Conference on Combating Piracy Part 3

End Game! An International Conference on Combating Piracy Part 1

End Game! An International Conference on Combating Piracy Part 2