System of courts that interprets and applies the law
POPULARITY
Categories
716 episodes with judicial
319 episodes with judicial
97 episodes with judicial
87 episodes with judicial
114 episodes with judicial
50 episodes with judicial
72 episodes with judicial
22 episodes with judicial
73 episodes with judicial
32 episodes with judicial
25 episodes with judicial
57 episodes with judicial
31 episodes with judicial
24 episodes with judicial
39 episodes with judicial
21 episodes with judicial
18 episodes with judicial
58 episodes with judicial
28 episodes with judicial
72 episodes with judicial
27 episodes with judicial
47 episodes with judicial
16 episodes with judicial
33 episodes with judicial
21 episodes with judicial
22 episodes with judicial
27 episodes with judicial
17 episodes with judicial
38 episodes with judicial
29 episodes with judicial
20 episodes with judicial
8 episodes with judicial
23 episodes with judicial
23 episodes with judicial
7 episodes with judicial
22 episodes with judicial
16 episodes with judicial
17 episodes with judicial
17 episodes with judicial
21 episodes with judicial
14 episodes with judicial
7 episodes with judicial
14 episodes with judicial
14 episodes with judicial
14 episodes with judicial
20 episodes with judicial
20 episodes with judicial
12 episodes with judicial
9 episodes with judicial
25 episodes with judicial
16 episodes with judicial
6 episodes with judicial
25 episodes with judicial
18 episodes with judicial
A decisão que concedeu perdão judicial a Monique Medeiros, acusada pela morte do filho Henry Borel, provocou reação do pai da criança, Leniel Borel, e do Ministério Público, que vai recorrer da sentença.
Donald Trump's name has been removed from the Kennedy Center's website, after a court ruled that changing the name of the Kennedy Center was illegal, and only Congress may make such a change. Trump lashed out against the ruling on Truth Social, criticizing the judge and claiming opponents would rather see the venue struggle. While he initially threatened to hand complete control over to Congress, he later clarified on Air Force One that he intends to remain as chairman and pursue development plans.Let's hope more there are more deletions to come.Find Glenn on Patreon: www.patreon.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Tal Fortgang discusses the "Scalian revolution" that shifted the Supreme Court toward judicial restraint. He notes that while Scalia faced a hostile press and "nasty" internal criticism from colleagues like Harry Blackmun, his ideas eventually prevailed. Fortgang also observes that the modern partisan venom in confirmation hearings began during Scalia's era with the contentious treatment of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. (12)1930
O MERCADO MUDOU RADICALMENTE EM 2026 - O QUE MAIS PODE VIR POR AÍ?Stock Pickers segue explorando o mercado de crédito privado, nesta edição com Eduardo Alhadeff, sócio e gestor da Ibiúna, que analisa a reviravolta do cenário macro até agora e seus impactos sobre crédito, juros, spreads, empresas e investidores.Ao longo da conversa, ele discute como a percepção sobre política e eleições passou a influenciar os preços dos ativos, os efeitos dos juros elevados sobre companhias endividadas, o aumento dos pedidos de recuperação judicial e os desafios enfrentados por nomes conhecidos do mercado, como Raízen e Braskem.Também falamos sobre o avanço das bets na economia brasileira, o comportamento do consumo das famílias e por que alguns dos "credissauros" mais experientes do mercado enxergam oportunidades justamente em um ambiente de maior incerteza.
Donald Trump was loudly booed by fans at Madison Square Garden when his face appeared on the arena's Jumbotron. He attended Game 3 of the 2026 NBA Finals between the New York Knicks and the San Antonio Spurs, making him the first sitting U.S. president to ever attend an NBA Finals game. This snarled traffic and prevented thousands of people from watching the game at the watch parties which were cancelled. Once again, he proved that he is a selfish, egomaniacal. egocentric, narcissistic, dumpster fire of a human being. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Is Isaiah 6 really just a call story, or is it one of Scripture's most powerful portraits of divine judgment and redemption? Discover how Isaiah's temple vision reveals a God who judges not to destroy, but to cleanse, restore, and prepare His people.
Poder Judicial en modo Juego de Tronos: el STJ y el Consejo de la Magistratura siguen midiéndose por los concursos de jueces.Mientras tanto la Mesa Interbarrial se reúne con Melella por el GLP y prepara un proyecto propio para llevar a la Legislatura.Familia judicial, gas envasado y rosca institucional.¿Querés data diaria? Escribinos al 2901 50-2990
Uma cláusula do contrato da Libra com a Globo virou motivo de tensão nos bastidores do futebol brasileiro. Com o acesso do Remo à Série A, os clubes passaram a dividir a mesma receita entre mais participantes, enquanto o valor pago pela emissora permaneceu inalterado.Neste vídeo analisamos os detalhes da negociação, os argumentos da Libra, a posição da Globo, o papel de Bap na discussão e os possíveis desdobramentos jurídicos do caso.QUER FALAR E INTERAGIR CONOSCO?: CONTATO I contato@serflamengo.com.br SITE I serflamengo.com.brTWITTER I @SiteSerFlamengoINSTAGRAM I @SiteserFlamengo#Flamengo #NotíciasDoFlamengo #Libra
Prosecutors in Arizona are set to criminally indict a bunch of sycophants for trying to help Donald Trump steal the 2020 election. This includes many well known names like Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and others. And the Arizona prosecutors are criminally indicting these folks for the second time . . .because yeah - better late than never.Glenn has the latest from the Arizona courts.Find Glen on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
SHORT TITLE OPTIONS Graham's Reckoning? South Carolina Showdown Corruption, Reform & Runoffs The GOP Civil War Begins Anybody But Lindsey? DESCRIPTION South Carolina politics takes center stage as fierce criticism of Senator Lindsey Graham collides with major campaign interviews from Attorney General candidate David Stumbo, anti-corruption challenger David Pascoe, and gubernatorial hopeful Alan Wilson. Accusations of establishment politics, judicial corruption, immigration failures, and the lingering fallout from Russiagate dominate a heated primary day discussion. Is South Carolina on the verge of political reform—or more of the same? EPISODE SUMMARY Today's episode dives deep into South Carolina's Republican primary battles, featuring sharp attacks against Senator Lindsey Graham and claims that his post-election political transformation could quickly disappear after securing another term. The conversation explores long-standing frustrations over immigration enforcement, judicial reform, government transparency, and legislative influence in Columbia. Attorney General candidate David Stumbo outlines plans to overhaul judicial selection and reduce reliance on politically connected law firms. David Pascoe presents himself as the anti-corruption candidate prepared to challenge the state's entrenched political establishment. Meanwhile, gubernatorial candidate Alan Wilson lays out a vision for eliminating income taxes, reducing property taxes, restructuring state government, and taking a more aggressive approach toward legislative resistance. The episode also examines broader concerns about media influence, Russiagate, federal investigations, and voter trust, while highlighting growing divisions within South Carolina's Republican Party. KEY TOPICS Lindsey Graham and Republican primary tensions South Carolina immigration enforcement debate Russiagate and Trump-era investigations Judicial reform proposals Attorney General race breakdown Government corruption allegations Alan Wilson's gubernatorial platform Property tax and income tax reform Legislative accountability South Carolina GOP future CHAPTERS 00:00 Lindsey Graham and the Republican establishment 08:22 Immigration enforcement and Palmetto Pen controversy 15:10 Alan Wilson joins the show 18:45 Wilson's case for governor 24:50 Tax reform and government restructuring 31:15 Taking on the South Carolina Senate 39:00 Lindsey Graham, Russiagate, and Trump's first term 50:10 David Stumbo discusses Attorney General race 54:40 Judicial reform and corruption concerns 1:03:15 Conservative priorities and law enforcement 1:10:30 David Pascoe enters the debate 1:14:20 Anti-corruption platform and establishment criticism 1:22:45 Final election day arguments CLICKABLE TITLE OPTIONS Why Lindsey Graham's Biggest Critics Say The Real Him Returns Tomorrow South Carolina GOP Civil War Explodes on Primary Day Alan Wilson Promises Tax Cuts, Judicial Reform & Political Fights David Pascoe Declares War on Columbia's Political Machine The Battle for South Carolina's Future Is Happening Right Now Republican Candidates Unload on Corruption, Courts and Graham Could South Carolina Be Headed for a Political Shakeup? Inside the Fierce GOP Primary Fight Rocking South Carolina Attorney General Candidates Promise Major Government Reform The Establishment vs. The Outsiders: South Carolina Decides YOUTUBE TAGS South Carolina politics, Lindsey Graham, Alan Wilson, David Stumbo, David Pascoe, South Carolina governor race, South Carolina attorney general race, GOP primary, Republican primary, judicial reform, government corruption, South Carolina senate, Donald Trump, Russiagate, immigration enforcement, conservative politics, election day, South Carolina elections, political podcast, Tara Show THUMBNAIL TEXT OPTIONS ANYBODY BUT LINDSEY? GOP CIVIL WAR SC POLITICAL SHAKEUP REFORM OR MORE OF THE SAME? GRAHAM UNDER FIRE CORRUPTION CRACKDOWN? PRIMARY DAY SHOWDOWN WHO RUNS SOUTH CAROLINA? SEO K ...
SHORT TITLE OPTIONS Lindsey Graham: The Real Return? SC GOP Breaks Open The Machine vs. the Movement Trump, Graham & the Primary War “Anybody But Lindsey?” DESCRIPTION South Carolina's Republican politics erupt in a fiery Election Day broadcast as deep divisions inside the GOP collide with renewed attacks on Senator Lindsey Graham's record, particularly his role during the Russia collusion investigations. The episode features a sweeping discussion of establishment power in Washington and Columbia, alongside interviews with conservative challengers pushing anti-corruption platforms, judicial reform, and major restructuring of state government. From immigration enforcement frustrations to claims of uniparty control, the conversation paints a picture of a Republican Party at war with itself—while voters head to the polls to decide its future direction. EPISODE SUMMARY Today's broadcast centers on a sharp political critique of Senator Lindsey Graham, arguing that his public posture shifts depending on electoral timing and political pressure, particularly in relation to the Trump era and the Russia collusion investigations. The discussion revisits the Russiagate period, describing it as a defining moment in modern Republican distrust of federal institutions and intelligence leadership, while alleging that key officials and lawmakers played roles in expanding or legitimizing the investigation. Layered into the conversation are broader South Carolina political themes, including frustration with immigration enforcement policy, claims of entrenched “machine politics” in Columbia, and skepticism toward establishment Republican leadership. The program also features extended candidate interviews from the state's Republican primary races, where contenders for attorney general and governor lay out competing visions focused on judicial reform, tax reduction, anti-corruption enforcement, and expanding executive power. As Election Day unfolds, the episode frames the vote as a referendum on both state leadership and the direction of the Republican Party itself. KEY TOPICS Lindsey Graham and GOP establishment criticism Russia collusion / Russiagate political legacy South Carolina “political machine” allegations Immigration enforcement debate in SC GOP primary dynamics and voter turnout Judicial reform proposals Income tax elimination and fiscal policy Attorney General race coverage Governor race policy platforms Republican Party internal conflict CHAPTERS 00:00 — Election Day and South Carolina GOP tensions 06:45 — “Machine politics” and establishment control claims 13:30 — Immigration enforcement frustrations in SC 20:10 — Lindsey Graham and Russiagate controversy revisited 31:25 — Trump-era investigations and political fallout 42:00 — Attorney General candidate interviews begin 50:15 — Judicial reform and corruption arguments 59:40 — Tax cuts, education, and executive power expansion 1:08:30 — Governor's race and legislative power struggle 1:18:00 — Final Election Day messaging and voter appeal SOUND BITES “That machine has been in place for years.” “He'll be one version during the election—and another after.” “The Russia collusion narrative shaped everything that followed.” “This is a job interview for the governor's office.” “The governor should lead from the front.” “Anybody but the machine.” SOCIAL MEDIA POST (FACEBOOK)
Doruk Erhan on the crackdown on Turkey's main opposition party. Judicial operations on the CHP have led pundits to warn the country is shifting to a post-democratic system of arbitrary rule, but in recent articles for the Verfassungsblog, Erhan makes a relatively optimistic case for the opposition's path forward. Please support Turkey Book Talk on Patreon or Substack. Supporters get a 35% discount on all Turkey/Ottoman History books published by Bloomsbury Academic, transcripts of every interview, and links to articles related to each episode.
Juan Pablo Polvorinos analiza la multitud de casos judiciales que rodean al presidente cercado ahora por la trama de las cloacas de Leire Díez.
Donald Trump's former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, is expected to plead guilty to one criminal charge for essentially mishandling classified information. You can already hear Donald Trump's flunkies, lapdogs and sycophants using the Bolton guilty plea as proof that Donald Trump and his Department of Justice don't vindictively go after people. They will say "Because John Bolton is pleading guilty, he's not being wrongfully prosecuted". Trump's flunkies will try to use the guilty plea as evidence that ALL of the other criminal prosecutions that Donald Trump has demanded his dirty DOJ officials pursue - James Comey, Leticia James, Jerome Powell, six members of Congress, etc. - are somehow validated as righteous by virtue of Bolton's guilty plea. But that's not true at all because not all vindictive prosecutions are created equal.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
On this episode of Reaganism, Roger Zakheim sits down with Yonatan Green, author of the new book "Rogue Justice: The Rise of Judicial Supremacy in Israel." They explore the controversial role of the Israeli Supreme Court, which Green argues has overstepped its bounds by exercising judicial review without a formal constitution. Green explains how the court's actions have led to significant political and social implications in Israel, including debates over democracy and judicial reform. The conversation highlights the irony of Israel's vibrant democracy being challenged by its own judicial system, and Green advocates for a constitutional assembly to address these issues.
-Do we trust the Judicial system in Texas anymore? Some are asking
Sección en el programa El Remate de la Diez Capital radio con nuestro abogado particular, Juan Inurria. Puente descubrió esta semana que entre las funciones del Poder Judicial «no está derribar gobiernos». Yo, que llevo más de treinta años frecuentando juzgados, cuando estudié y cuando lo sigo haciendo no lo veo escrito en ninguna parte, pero sí, en cambio en las barbaridades que espeta el gobierno sanchista, está este nuevo mantra que compran la manada de votantes que le siguen. Y es que cada cual aprende donde puede. Y esta vez te toco a ti Puente, Bolaños no quiso. El CGPJ respondió con un comunicado. Dijo que ciertas declaraciones de «altas instituciones del Estado» erosionan la confianza ciudadana en el Estado de Derecho. Sin dar nombres. Que respetuosos. Y Puente replicó que la justicia también está sometida a crítica, como cualquier otro poder. Tiene razón, Puente. Lo está. Pero hay una diferencia que cualquier albergador de sentido común conoce, y es que criticar una sentencia es un derecho. De eso a que el Gobierno mande a descalificar a los jueces que lo investigan es otra cosa distinta. Esa otra cosa tiene nombres varios, así que queridos lectores uds. pónganle el que más les guste. Donde el CGPJ anduvo con pies de plomo, por si le riñen a su presidenta, las asociaciones profesionales no se anduvieron con rodeos -todas menos una- La Asociación Profesional de la Magistratura, la Asociación Judicial Francisco de Vitoria, el Foro Judicial Independiente y las dos principales asociaciones de fiscales firmaron un comunicado conjunto. Sin eufemismos, y dejo claro que se trata de una «estrategia orquestada para atentar contra la independencia judicial». Su crítica más dura no fue para el Consejo -cuya declaración calificaron de insuficiente- sino para la Fiscalía General – que recuerden depende de Sánchez- a la que acusaron sin ambages de ignorar su deber legal de defender la independencia judicial. Queridos amigos, los jueces y fiscales del reino de España diciéndole al fiscal general que no hace su trabajo. Firmaron todas las asociaciones de la carrera. Todas menos una: Jueces y Juezas para la Democracia. Que dicen todo sin decir nada. ¿Qué independientes, verdad? El detonante fue una jueza de Badajoz, que es Magistrada, Beatriz Biedma, que fue instructora en el caso del hermanísimo de Sánchez. La trama es que se habría ordenado seguimientos sobre ella, su familia y su entorno profesional. Con el propósito, según las informaciones publicadas, de hostigarla y desacreditarla. Una magistrada espiada por hacer su trabajo. Si eso no es un ataque al Estado de Derecho, que es lo que tiene que pasar. Y al parecer todo lo hacia una tal Leire que pasaba por allí. Otro Juez, o Magistrado mejor dicho, Pedraz lleva semanas removiendo los cimientos de Ferraz, que es la sede o el local del PSOE en Madrid. La UCO pasó por allí y se quedo doce horas. Y hemos sabido esta semana que el sumario del caso Leire apunta a una trama pagada con fondos del PSOE para entorpecer causas judiciales que afectaban al partido y al Gobierno de Sánchez. Santos Cerdán como presunto cabeza visible. Gaspar Zarrías, la gerente del partido y varios compañeros abogados como co-investigados. El magistrado sitúa el arranque en una reunión del 26 de abril de 2024 y por aquel entonces recordar lo qué estaba ocurriendo exactamente esos días con el presidente y su famosa carta de reflexión, por lo que le pasaba a su esposa. También esta semana en Badajoz, seguíamos con el juicio al hermano del presidente. Y su hermano David negó cualquier implicación en la creación de su propio puesto. Claro, el resto somos bobos. La UCO señaló que buscó piso en Badajoz un mes antes de que le adjudicaran la plaza. Uno puede buscar piso donde le plazca o pueda pagar. Pero cuando ese dato se suma a un expediente para crear su plaza, a testigos que en el juicio recordaron las cosas de forma llamativamente distinta a como las recordaban en instrucción, – a mí me pasa a diario- y a un puesto que nadie cubrió mientras él no estaba, el cuadro tiene una pintura descarada que no necesita demasiada imaginación o sí, en fin, créanse lo que consideren creerse, yo lo dejo aquí que tengo que preparar la visita del Papa y el inicio de los mundiales. De cualquier manera, ya Montesquieu escribió que no hay libertad donde el poder judicial no está separado del ejecutivo. Lo escribió en 1748. Hay quien lleva desde entonces sin leerlo. Descarados. Puente lee.
As AI moves deeper into the courtroom, is justice becoming smarter or more vulnerable? In this episode of The Valley Current®, host Jack Russo examines the growing collision between artificial intelligence and the legal system. From lawyers sanctioned over hallucinated case citations to judges and clerks grappling with AI-generated errors, the courts are confronting serious questions about trust, accountability, and truth. Drawing on real cases and emerging judicial policies, this discussion explores whether AI is merely assisting legal work or quietly reshaping how justice is delivered. As automation accelerates and AGI edges closer, one unsettling question remains: if machines help argue the law and help decide it, where does human judgment truly stand? Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"®️
Prepárese: En Valle de México se pronostican lluvias, granizo y viento 6 de cada 10 mujeres representan el personal médico: UNAM En medio de señalamientos judiciales de EE. UU., Raúl Castro reaparece en Cuba Más información en nuestro podcast#grc
In this episode of Justice Matters, Glenn joins Jody Hamilton as she fills in on the Stephanie Miller Show to discuss the rampant corruption permeating our political landscape. From the absurd calls for Texans to drive to California to vote illegally, to the ongoing issues with the Treasury Department, Glenn highlights the stark contrasts between past administrations and the current state of affairs. He emphasizes the urgent need for accountability, particularly in light of the ongoing investigations into Donald Trump's actions and the implications for future governance. The conversation also touches on the importance of holding individuals accountable for their roles in corruption, drawing parallels to historical precedents set during the Nixon era.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
One of the big stories in the news this week -- with some additional developments this morning -- is the two people picked by Governor Spencer Cox to serve on the Utah Supreme Court. Earlier this week, the Governor announced Stephen Dent and Jay Jorgensen, neither of whom has served as a judge. Now, a non-profit group called Co-Equal Utah is voicing concerns with the two of them being put on the bench. Does it actually matter though? Inside Sources has a conversation with Former Utah Supreme Court Justice John A. Pearce.
En entrevista con Pamela Cerdeira, para MVS Noticias, Javier Martín Reyes, investigador de la UNAM y del Instituto Baker, habló sobre publican en el DOF la Reforma Judicial 2.0, la nulidad de elecciones por injerencia extranjera y la comisión en el INE para revisar candidaturas.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A federal judge has ordered the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to remove Donald Trump's name from its facade and official materials, ruling the Trump administration's rebranding was illegal. The court also temporarily blocked the board's plans to close the venue for two years. Glenn explains - there's more good news as Donald Trump's popularity is shrinking drastically on his social media site too.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
DESCRIPTION Attorney General candidate Steven Goldfinch joins Tara to discuss violent crime, judicial reform, government transparency, and the controversies surrounding South Carolina's legal system. Plus, why Tara says Florida keeps accomplishing conservative priorities while South Carolina continues falling behind. PODCAST SUMMARY Today's show opened with a discussion about cultural and political debates surrounding gender, language, public safety, and the Democratic Party's messaging on social issues. Tara argued that progressive policies have increasingly blurred traditional distinctions between men and women, creating conflicts over women's sports, gender-specific language, and public safety concerns. The conversation focused on what she described as a growing disconnect between Democratic leadership and many voters on issues of gender, crime, and cultural identity. The show then shifted to a major interview with State Senator Steven Goldfinch, who is seeking the Republican nomination for Attorney General of South Carolina. Goldfinch credited current Attorney General Alan Wilson with several accomplishments, including efforts to combat internet crimes against children and address violent crime prosecutions. However, he argued that significant reforms are still needed, particularly regarding South Carolina's growing backlog of violent crime cases. According to Goldfinch, many counties face delays of four to five years before serious criminal cases reach trial. He warned that these delays can undermine prosecutions, weaken evidence, and force victims to relive traumatic experiences for years. The conversation also explored judicial reform. Goldfinch advocated moving toward a system that more closely resembles the federal judicial nomination process, where the governor nominates judges and lawmakers vote to confirm them. He argued that restoring public confidence in the judiciary requires greater transparency and structural reforms. Tara also questioned Goldfinch about concerns surrounding outside legal contracts and relationships between lawmakers, law firms, and government agencies. Goldfinch repeatedly emphasized transparency and public disclosure as the best safeguards against corruption and conflicts of interest. The program concluded with a comparison between South Carolina and Florida. Tara highlighted recent policy proposals in Florida involving tax relief and argued that South Carolina should pursue more aggressive reforms to reduce costs for residents and improve government accountability. KEY TAKEAWAYS Steven Goldfinch outlined his vision for South Carolina's Attorney General's Office. Violent crime case backlogs remain a major concern across the state. Judicial reform continues to be a central issue in South Carolina politics. Transparency was repeatedly emphasized as a solution to government corruption concerns. Questions about legal contracts, law firms, and state government remain active political issues. Comparisons between Florida and South Carolina continue to drive policy debates. Crime, accountability, and government reform dominated today's discussion. QUOTE OF THE DAY "Sunlight and transparency are the solution to all of this." SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS Cultural Issues and Political Messaging Tara examined ongoing debates surrounding gender, language, and public safety. Steven Goldfinch Makes His Case The attorney general candidate outlined his priorities and vision for the office. The Violent Crime Backlog Goldfinch warned that delayed prosecutions continue to hurt victims and weaken justice. Judicial Reform Front and Center Discussion focused on changing how South Carolina selects and confirms judges. Can South Carolina Follow Florida? The show closed with a comparison of policy reforms and tax relief efforts. SOCIAL MEDIA POST
NotiMundo al Día - Rosa Torres - Reforma al Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial by FM Mundo 98.1
Today's legal development involves the $10 billion lawsuit Donald Trump brought against the IRS. He brought it against himself, because he controls the IRS. Then, Trump dismissed the case that he had brought against himself. AND THEN, he settled with himself for $1.8 billion of our tax money with which he created a cop-beaters fund.Now U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams; who's been presiding over that case; reopened the it to see if Donald Trump perpetrated a fraud on the court. (Spoiler alert: it really looks like he did).Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Reforma judicial incluiría exámenes para aspirantes: Sheinbaum Coahuila renovará su Congreso estatalEuropa busca proteger ruta clave para el petróleo mundialMás información en nuestro podcast#grc
Se invertirá más de 69 mil millones en carreteras: SICT Venta de vehículos ligeros crece casi 5% en MéxicoConflicto en Medio Oriente impacta economía global: OCDEMás información en nuestro podcast#grc
A federal judge has temporarily stopped the creation of a $1.8 billion government fund to compensate individuals who claimed to be targets of political investigation by previous presidential administrations. Judge Leonie Brinkema barred the justice department from taking any steps to stand up or operate the fund - including processing or dispersing claims - until a preliminary hearing on June 12th.Glenn says: Let's call it what it is - a cop beaters fund!Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
It appears accountability is catching up to Pam Bondi. A compelling and damning complaint has been filed with the Florida State bar, detailing a mountain of unethical conduct by Bondi while she was serving as Attorney General. Glenn reviews some of the contents of the ethics complaint against her. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Con Elisa Beni, Carolina Bescansa y Julián Casanova hablamos de la semana horribilis para la política española con los casos de corrupción que aparecen vinculados al gobierno, el juicio del caso Kitchen que afecta al PP y las huelgas y movilizaciones de los profesores en Valencia, Catalunya y Madrid, en defensa de la enseñanza pública.
After firing her as Attorney General, Donald Trump is now bringing Pam Bondi back into the executive branch fold.Let's ask the obvious question: after unceremoniously throwing Pam Bondi under the bus, why is Trump bringing her back?Could it be to keep her quiet about his involvement in the Epstein files?Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Federico analiza el inicio del juicio al hermano de Sánchez en el que su abogado atacó a los jueces en la línea de lo dicho por Óscar Puente.
After firing her as Attorney General, Donald Trump is now bringing Pam Bondi back into the executive branch fold.Let's ask the obvious question: after unceremoniously throwing Pam Bondi under the bus, why is Trump bringing her back?Could it be to keep her quiet about his involvement in the Epstein files?Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Viva Aerobus alerta por restricciones ante brote de ébola SEMOVI lanza campaña por seguridad vial en CDMXCinco países firman acuerdo contra crimen organizadoMás información en nuestro podcast#grc
It seems like actual lawyers are no longer drafting the motions, briefs, and pleadings that the Department of Justice is filing in federal court case. A brand new court filing in Trump's ballroom case reads like it was drafted, not by any self-respecting DOJ lawyer, but by a deranged, cognitively impaired, aspiring dictate, at 2 am, with a sharpie. And this new court filing repeatedly references how Trump's proposed ballroom will be "hermetically sealed." Now where do you think he came up with that phrase? Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Preview for Later Today: Steven Mazie details the Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara concerning birthright citizenship, discussing Trump's challenge to the 14th Amendment and an AI tool predicting a lopsided judicial ruling against the former president.1911 SCOTUS
It seems like actual lawyers are no longer drafting the motions, briefs, and pleadings that the Department of Justice is filing in federal court case. A brand new court filing in Trump's ballroom case reads like it was drafted, not by any self-respecting DOJ lawyer, but by a deranged, cognitively impaired, aspiring dictate, at 2 am, with a sharpie. And this new court filing repeatedly references how Trump's proposed ballroom will be "hermetically sealed." Now where do you think he came up with that phrase? Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In breaking news, three federal appeals court judges, including two appointed by Donald Trump himself, struck down Alabama's redistricting because it was "racially discriminatory."Sometimes there are points of light that burst through the Trump-induced darkness. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In early May 2026, transport vans rolled out of Ridglan Farms in Blue Mounds, Wisconsin, carrying beagles toward new lives—grass under their paws, sunlight on their faces, and homes instead of stacked wire cages. Nearly 1,500 beagles were purchased by rescue organizations like Big Dog Ranch Rescue and the Beagle Freedom Project after years of documented suffering at one of the nation's largest commercial beagle breeders for biomedical research. This outcome marks a rare, tangible win for animal advocates. But it came only after daring direct-action raids, mass protests met with tear gas and rubber bullets, a special prosecutor's investigation, and persistent legal pressure. Even now, roughly 500 dogs may remain behind as Ridglan winds down its commercial breeding operations by July 1, 2026. The Ridglan story is not just about one facility. It exposes deep, systemic failures in U.S. law that leave millions of animals in laboratories with minimal protections—and even those “covered” by federal rules often receive little meaningful relief. The Raids That Forced Change On March 15, 2026, activists from groups linked to the Coalition to Save the Ridglan Dogs breached fences and buildings at Ridglan Farms. They removed around 22–30 beagles. Some were successfully rehomed; others were recovered by police. However, an estimated 2000 beagles remained in captivity, potentially subject to additional horrific experimentation. Our guest, Dean Guzman Wyrzykowski, was one of these activists. A second, larger action on April 18 drew roughly 1,000 protesters to rescue the remaining beagles. Law enforcement responded with tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets. No additional dogs could be rescued that day. Dozens of protesters were arrested, including our guest on The Breggin Hour, Dean Guzman Wyrzykowski, a San Francisco Bay Area-based animal rights activist and political organizer. He is co-founder of The Simple Heart Initiative—a nonprofit dedicated to advancing species equality through open rescue, impact litigation, undercover investigations, and activist training. With over eight years in nonprofit advocacy, Dean has recruited and trained hundreds of activists and is one of the lead organizers of the Ridglan campaign. He now faces serious felony burglary charges—potentially up to 12 years in prison—along with several co-defendants for the first March 15, 2026, rescue effort. Further charges may be pending. As a top priority, we urge that the charges be reduced or dropped to reflect the vastly important ethical basis of the actions of these animal advocates. How to Help Dean Dean reports that the best way to assist him with legal costs is to become a paid subscriber to his Substack at Urbananimal.substack.com. To support ending the breeding of dogs for lab testing, go to Save the Dogs, make a donation, and join over 111,581 others who have already signed the petition to end breeding of dogs for laboratory use. These weren't the first efforts to expose and stop the abuses of these dogs. Ridglan had faced scrutiny for years, including earlier investigations. The raids amplified public outrage and accelerated negotiations between rescuers and Ridglan Farms. In late April, rescue groups announced they had reached a deal to acquire ~1,500 dogs. Transports began in early May, with many “frosted face” seniors (older dogs with graying muzzles) now adjusting to life outside the facility—initially flinching at touch but quickly learning to wag tails and play. Decades of Alleged Cruelty at Ridglan — and Why It Is Winding Down Ridglan Farms operated for decades as a major supplier of beagles for testing. Former employees and state inspections described windowless warehouses, stacked cages over waste pits, high ammonia levels, rusted wires causing injuries, and routine surgeries (including eye procedures and devocalizations) performed without anesthesia or proper pain relief—sometimes by non-veterinarians. In 2025, Wisconsin's Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) cited Ridglan for hundreds of violations. A judge found probable cause for animal cruelty. Special Prosecutor Tim Gruenke was appointed to investigate. Rather than face criminal charges, Ridglan chose to wind down. In a negotiated settlement in late 2025, the company agreed to surrender its Wisconsin commercial dog-breeding license by July 1, 2026. This effectively ends its large-scale commercial breeding and sales of beagles to external laboratories. In exchange, the state dropped the threat of felony animal cruelty prosecutions. This agreement was driven by years of accumulated citations, whistleblower testimony, undercover investigations, and intense public and activist pressure. While Ridglan can still conduct limited on-site research under its federal USDA licenses, its days as a major commercial beagle supplier are over. Parallels with Envigo and Other Scandals Ridglan is far from isolated. In 2022, a major scandal erupted at Envigo's breeding facility in Cumberland, Virginia. PETA's undercover investigation revealed severe neglect: inadequate food, veterinary care, housing, and staffing; dead puppies were left among litters; and unqualified staff performed invasive procedures. The U.S. Department of Justice intervened, leading to the rescue of over 4,000 beagles—the largest such seizure in U.S. history. Envigo (and its parent company Inotiv) later pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the Animal Welfare Act and the Clean Water Act, agreeing to pay a record $35 million+ in fines and shutting down the breeding operation. From the Beagles to the Breggins, Senator Bill Stanley Sought Justice for the Underdog At a state level, key Virginia state legislators were involved in advocating for stronger animal welfare regulations in response to documented Animal Welfare Act violations, poor conditions, and high puppy mortality in the facility. Sen. Bill Stanley (R-Franklin County) was a leading champion at the state level. He visited the facility multiple times, co-sponsored several “Beagle Bills” in 2022 (e.g., SB 87, SB 88, SB 90, SB 604) to increase oversight, close loopholes for research animals, require adoption offers before euthanasia, and penalize repeat violators. He adopted two Envigo beagles (Daisy and Dixie) and worked on adoptions/rescues. We are especially happy to acknowledge Sen. Stanley's contributions because, among several attorneys we contacted to defend us against Robert Malone's lawfare defamation suit against us for $25 million, Bill was the first attorney willing to seriously pursue our case, which ended in the presiding judge throwing Malone's case out of court. From the beagles to the Breggins, Senator Stanley has sought justice for the underdog. The Sand Fly Experiments and High-Profile Scandals Public outrage over government-funded beagle suffering peaked in the early 2020s with revelations about NIH-funded experiments under Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). One widely criticized study involved beagle puppies in Tunisia exposed to sand flies carrying parasites (to study leishmaniasis). Reports described dogs having their heads locked in mesh cages filled with infected sand flies, being used as live bait in desert cages overnight, and in some cases undergoing cordectomies (vocal cord removal) to silence barking. The experiments sparked bipartisan congressional criticism and intense media coverage. The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) and partners filed habeas corpus petitions seeking court recognition of the Ridglan dogs' right to freedom from cruelty and immediate remedies. While initial petitions faced dismissal, appeals continue for the remaining animals. Why U.S. Law Fails Experimental Animals The core federal statute is the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) of 1966 (and its amendments), enforced by the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). It sets minimum standards for housing, feeding, veterinary care, and handling of certain animals. Critical Limitations Include: Massive Species Exclusions: Rats, mice, and birds bred for research—accounting for roughly 95% of lab animals—are explicitly excluded. Cold-blooded animals and others also fall outside coverage. Weak Standards for Covered Species: Even for dogs, cats, primates, etc., the AWA permits painful procedures if deemed “scientifically necessary.” There is no outright ban on specific types of experiments. Self-Regulation via IACUCs: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees—dominated by researchers at the institutions they oversee—review protocols. Approval rates hover near 98%, with limited external oversight. Enforcement Gaps: Under-resourced inspections, reliance on self-reporting, and modest penalties limit impact. Ridglan itself had passed many USDA inspections despite state-level findings of serious issues. Property Status: Animals remain legal property. Novel habeas efforts like the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) challenge this but face significant judicial hurdles, as courts have historically rejected animal “personhood” claims. For those of us who learned in childhood about unconditional love from our dogs, they are not only of equal value to people, but they seem on a higher spiritual level in the love they have given to us. Other frameworks, such as the Public Health Service Policy, apply only to federally funded research and offer even less robust enforcement. The 2022 FDA Modernization Act opened doors to non-animal alternatives, but broader statutory mandates for the “3Rs” (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) remain limited. Reform efforts often stall due to powerful research lobbies, congressional agriculture committees' oversight, and public support for medical research that can overshadow welfare concerns. Broader Context and the Path Forward Ridglan and Envigo show that systemic problems persist despite occasional rescues and fines. Millions of animals continue to be used annually in U.S. labs, yet positive developments exist: growing adoption of alternatives (organ-on-chip, AI modeling, human cell cultures), increased rehoming programs, and shifting public opinion favoring stronger protections. The Ridglan victory shows that sustained pressure—investigations, lawsuits, public protest, and direct rescue—can force change where law falls short. Yet relying on activists risking felony charges is not sustainable. Meaningful reform requires: Expanding Animal Welfare Act coverage to all vertebrates. Stronger, independent oversight and enforcement with real penalties. Mandatory consideration and funding for non-animal methods. Judicial tools (like effective habeas relief) to address cruelty in licensed facilities promptly. A Call to Readers The beagles now tasting freedom represent hope—but hundreds may still face uncertainty, and systemic issues persist for countless others. Share their stories. Support reputable rescues and organizations like The Simple Heart Initiative, the Nonhuman Rights Project, Beagle Freedom Project, and others working on legal and legislative fronts. Contact your representatives and demand real modernization of the Animal Welfare Act. Persistence works. Now we must translate outrage into lasting legal change—so no more facilities like this exist in the first place. What are your thoughts on balancing research needs with animal welfare? Have you followed the Ridglan story, the Envigo case, Dean's work, or the earlier sand fly scandals? Drop a comment or share this post. References / Endnotes Wisconsin Examiner / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel coverage of Ridglan rescues and settlement (2026). Nonhuman Rights Project – Ridglan Beagles case page. U.S. Department of Justice – Envigo sentencing and $35M+ resolution (2024). Bipartisan congressional letters on NIAID/Tunisia sand fly experiments (2021). Dean Guzman Wyrzykowski / The Simple Heart Initiative statements (2026). USDA Animal Welfare Act overview and limitations. Additional reporting from WPR, Right to Rescue, and related investigations. ______ Learn more about Dr. Peter Breggin's work: https://breggin.com/ See more from Dr. Breggin's long history of being a reformer in psychiatry: https://breggin.com/Psychiatry-as-an-Instrument-of-Social-and-Political-Control Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, the how-to manual @ https://breggin.com/a-guide-for-prescribers-therapists-patients-and-their-families/ Get a copy of Dr. Breggin's latest book: WHO ARE THE “THEY” - THESE GLOBAL PREDATORS? WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR PLANS FOR US? HOW CAN WE DEFEND AGAINST THEM? Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey Get a copy: https://www.wearetheprey.com/ “No other book so comprehensively covers the details of COVID-19 criminal conduct as well as its origins in a network of global predators seeking wealth and power at the expense of human freedom and prosperity, under cover of false public health policies.” ~ Robert F Kennedy, Jr Author of #1 bestseller The Real Anthony Fauci and Founder, Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel for Children's Health Defense.
In breaking news, three federal appeals court judges, including two appointed by Donald Trump himself, struck down Alabama's redistricting because it was "racially discriminatory."Sometimes there are points of light that burst through the Trump-induced darkness. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Did you know that the January 6 attack on the US Capitol didn't happen?! That must be the case because there's no mention of the prosecutions of any of the January 6 rioters, attackers, or insurrectionists on DOJ's website - they just deleted it. Apparently, they think they can just erase it from American history by deleting it from a website. This is a sign of weakness, not strength. These people will fall from power, and then . . . accountability!Because especially at the Department of Justice . . . justice matters.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substck.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Today on AirTalk: L.A. Philharmonic names next music director (0:30) L.A. and O.C. judicial races (19:43) Most annoying commercial jingles (34:42) The latest on the Garden Grove tank leak (51:37) Is the L.A. city attorney favoring donors? (59:30) Google search AI integration (1:12:05) Mono Lake basin (1:25:51) Visit www.preppi.com/LAist to receive a FREE Preppi Emergency Kit (with any purchase over $100) and be prepared for the next wildfire, earthquake or emergency.
A federal judge has thrown out the Trump administration's criminal, immigrant-smuggling case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, ruling that the prosecution was “vindictive” retaliation against the Salvadoran immigrant for winning a high-profile challenge to his deportation from the U.S. “The evidence before this Court sadly reflects an abuse of prosecuting power,” U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw wrote Friday as he granted Abrego Garcia's request to dismiss the case. Glenn says: not only did Abrego Garcia win - the rule of law, and the United States Constitution also won as well.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
History often repeats itself. After the Watergate scandal, 48 of Richard Nixon goons were convicted of crimes, and 30 of them went to prison. Before they got caught, Nixon's criminal associates thought they were untouchable. After all, they were committing the crimes together with and for the benefit for the President of the United States. And they believed the president would save them.But accountability came for Nixon's minions and Donald Trump's goons are committing crimes together with and for the benefit of the president of the United States, and they also think they're untouchable. They think they are beyond the reach of the rule of law. Because after all, the president promised he will have their backs. But we all know Trump will have their backs stabbed.Accountability WILL come for Donald Trump's henchmen, just the way it came for Richard Nixon's goons.Believe.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Never give up on accountability - accountability for what Donald Trump and his dirty administration officials are doing to the American people, to immigrants, and to our democracy. In Minnesota, accountability has finally come in the form of criminal charges being brought for an unlawful shooting of an immigrant by an ICE agent in Minneapolis back in January. Never give up on accountability.Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In a breathtaking display of corruption and abuse of presidential power, Donald Trump is preparing to give our tax dollars to the rioters who attacked the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Put another way, Trump is about to reward with monetary payments the January 6 insurrections. Glenn says: as dark as things are at the moment, please remember: we have the midterms coming up. VOTE!Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
