Podcasts about Precedent

Marty York, columnist for the National Post Image: THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes

Any donation is greatly appreciated! 47e6GvjL4in5Zy5vVHMb9PQtGXQAcFvWSCQn2fuwDYZoZRk3oFjefr51WBNDGG9EjF1YDavg7pwGDFSAVWC5K42CBcLLv5U OR DONATE HERE: https://www.monerotalk.live/donate TODAY'S SHOW: This episdoe of MoneroTalk examines the ongoing legal case against Joseph “The Parrot” in Brazil and what it could mean for privacy advocates and Monero users around the world. Guests rsmith, who worked on documentation for Joseph's projects, and Low Point Goat, a close friend and supporter, explain the allegations, the international involvement in the investigation, and the financial and legal challenges facing Joseph's family. The conversation expands into the relationship between Monero, cash, privacy, decentralization, and individual self-determination, including how Monero's growing regulatory isolation could affect adoption. TIMESTAMPS: (00:02:36) Guest Introductions (00:07:11) The Charges Against Joseph (00:09:40) Why the Brazilian Case Is Controversial (00:12:41) Monero's Legal Status in Brazil (00:18:39) How the Monero Community Can Help (00:20:45) The Case's International Implications (00:24:36) 3D-Printed Guns & U.S. Law (00:27:31) AI, 3D Printing & Decentralization (00:33:00) Monero, Cash & Self-Defense (00:41:50) Monero's Legal & Political Landscape (00:50:06) MoneroKon 5 & Connecting Communities (00:53:57) DIY Projects & The Future (00:58:49) Joseph's Case, Monero & Human Rights (01:01:00) Final Thoughts & How to Follow the Case GUEST LINKS: https://x.com/lopointgoat Purchase Cafe & tip the farmers w/ XMR! https://gratuitas.org/ SPONSORS: Cakewallet.com, the first open-source Monero wallet for iOS. You can even exchange between XMR, BTC, LTC & more in the app! Monero.com by Cake Wallet - ONLY Monero wallet (https://monero.com/) StealthEX, an instant exchange. Go to (https://stealthex.io) to instantly exchange between Monero and 450 plus assets, w/o having to create an account or register & with no limits. WEBSITE: https://www.monerotopia.com CONTACT: monerotalk@protonmail.com ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@MoneroTalk:8 TWITTER: https://twitter.com/monerotalk FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/MoneroTalk HOST: https://twitter.com/douglastuman INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/monerotalk TELEGRAM: https://t.me/monerotopia MATRIX: https://matrix.to/#/%23monerotopia%3Amonero.social MASTODON: @Monerotalk@mastodon.social MONERO.TOWN: https://monero.town/u/monerotalkAny donation is greatly appreciated!Any donation is greatly appreciated!

This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4cmIBMV On the Thoughts on Money podcast, host Trevor Cummings speaks with New York-based Matthew Gregory and Brett Bonecutter about New York City's proposed “pied-à-terre” tax—an annual surcharge on high-value properties not used as a primary residence, aimed largely at nonresidents. They discuss the controversial rollout, including a publicly released list of potentially affected owners and subsequent legal challenges focused more on process than policy substance. Matthew outlines mechanics such as different valuation thresholds for homes versus condos/co-ops, and surcharges applied to the full property value, which can be substantial. The group debates the policy's murky goals, expected revenue reductions from exemptions and planning strategies (notably converting to rentals), market and migration effects, and the broader precedent of taxing behavior that other cities may watch closely. 00:00 Welcome to TOM 01:03 What Is Pied-à-Terre Tax 03:20 Rollout Reactions in NYC 05:44 What Problem It Solves 07:44 Posturing and Legal Fight 09:54 The Public List Controversy 11:47 How the Surcharge Works 13:16 Planning Around the Tax 14:03 Behavior Tax and National Stakes 16:31 Market Effects and Real Estate 19:51 Gaming Exemptions and Loopholes 25:24 Why It Feels Murky 28:14 Financial Planning Mindset 30:06 Precedent for Other Cities 32:55 Markets Price In Taxes 34:18 Final Thoughts and Wrap Up Links mentioned in this episode: http://thoughtsonmoney.com http://thebahnsengroup.com

What happens when the drawings and specifications don't agree?In this episode of What a Week, the team tackles a seemingly simple contract provision with potentially significant consequences: giving drawings precedence over written specifications. Using real project examples involving roofing assemblies and window requirements, Dave Stutzman, Steve Gantner, and Elias Saltz explore how an order-of-precedence clause can resolve a conflict in a way the design team or owner never intended. Instead of prompting an RFI, the contract may effectively answer the question for the contractor, potentially leaving specified performance requirements or materials behind. The discussion explains the importance of treating drawings and specifications as complementary documents, questioning precedence clauses when they appear, and protecting the design intent through better-coordinated contract documents.

Send us Fan MailRapid global change has created an unprecedented landscape. Many Boards have fallen into a reactive mode. A new research report from FGS Global highlights the challenges and offers insights to help boards govern with confidence again. In this podcast, Dr Sabine Dembkowski, Founder and Managing Partner, is joined by Dorothy Burwell. Dorothy is Global Head of Board Advisory at FGS Global, a board director herself at Post Holdings and Pennon PLC, and co-author of A Hard Job Getting Harder: The Board's Role in a Rewired World. Drawing on interviews with board directors and General Counsels in North America, the UK, and Europe, Dorothy brings both the data and lived experience to this conversation. What she found is sobering and actionable.“It is impossible to govern when you are flying blind.“One of the most striking points in the new research is that more than 50% of Boards receive no real-time data updates between meetings. This creates practical challenges for Boards in terms of both intelligence and credibility. Management will not take recommendations from an out-of-date Board seriously, nor can Boards react well using stale information. As a result, smart Boards are building adaptive capacity to obtain fresher data and insights without sacrificing the deep expertise and judgment of experienced members.“When you have to put everything together in a pretty, pretty bow and wrap it up for the board meeting, it's disruptive.”Board members are often advised “nose out, fingers out” when it comes to operations. Management teams can find it intrusive to need to pull up to deliver reports and data packets to the Board, especially in a time-sensitive crisis. However, the best Boards blend rigorous accountability with psychological safety to have authentic discussions of business challenges and needs. These conversations and data sharing happen between and around formal meetings, so that Boards can have more meaningful official sessions and offer more impactful support in crisis scenarios.“Our biggest job is to help management prioritise.”For Dorothy, the most important duty of a Board is to make it easier for management to identify and respond to risk and change with the right levels of urgency and prioritisation. To do this, she recommends a 2x2 decision matrix modelled from emergency medicine's best practices.In this matrix, Boards look at issues across two dimensions. The first asks if the change is evolutionary or revolutionary. Evolutionary change is sustained and gradual, while revolutionary change is disruptive and destructive. The second dimension asks if the change or issue is uniform or fragmented. This considers whether there will be equal impact or whether selected areas will be more intensely impacted.Once Boards understand where the issue falls in the matrix, they can work out the tangible ways to support management. For example, does a geopolitical risk require an adjustment of protocol over time, or an immediate halt to in-market activities? This approach clarifies conversations and nourishes ongoing transparency about priorities and impactThe three top takeaways from our conversation for effective boardss are:1.      The power of the question is no longer enough. You need continual dialogue to build trust and relationships as the foundation of meaningful governance.2.     If your decision architecture within your Board is not clear and well-practised or does not enable you to rapidly prioritise between issues, it's time to have a rethink.3.     Don't be afraid to question whether you need to unlearn some of your assumptions and build new ones based on experiences rooted in the current environment.Come Join The Better Boards Community We'd love to get to know you! If you'd like to become part of the Better Boards community, discover our unique approach, and explore ways to work with us or share your ideas on The Better Boards Podcast series, drop us a line at info@better-boards.com.

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code 404 at https://oneskin.co/404 We start this week with Joseph's article about Samuel Tunick, the man charged with allegedly wiping his phone before DHS officials could search it. It's a wild case with a lot to unpack. After the break, Jason tells us all about a TikTok Shop scheme powered by AI. In the subscribers-only section, we talk about possibly the dumbest AI tool ever made. You're Invited: 404 Media's Third Anniversary Live Podcast and Party! ‘The Government Hopes To Set a Precedent': An Interview With the Man Charged for Allegedly Wiping His GrapheneOS Phone Inside an AI TikTok Shop Slop Factory That Shills Supplements Recalled By the FDA Google Earth's New AI Lets Anyone Fabricate Completely Bullshit Satellite Images Youtube Version: https://youtu.be/lmikqHw1lX8 This is a production of 404 Media, a journalist-owned tech website. Learn more and subscribe at: htttps://404media.co Listen to our weekly podcasts: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-404-media-podcast/id1703615331?ref=404media.co Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0F3oY47l2XgoBMaAmIaw29?ref=404media.co Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5hY2FzdC5jb20vcHVibGljL3Nob3dzL3RoZS00MDQtbWVkaWEtcG9kY2FzdA?ref=404media.co Become a paid subscriber for access to bonus content: https://404media.co/membership Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Have you ever felt like your biggest mistake, deepest wound, or darkest season is the defining chapter of your life?In the final message of the Past Is Not Precedent series, we discover the incredible truth that God doesn't simply forgive your past—He redeems it. Through 2 Corinthians 5:14–21, we'll see that in Christ you are a new creation, your past takes on new meaning, and your story becomes part of God's greater story of redemption.Your past is not your identity.Your wounds are not your master.Your chains are not your future.Your story is still being written.No matter what chapter you're in today, Jesus is still holding the pen.Scripture:

President Trump's executive order about a U.S. Postal Service rule is before the U.S. Supreme Court. How much can a president weigh in on how elections are conducted?

These days, AI is everywhere, and it's increasingly hard to separate the gains from the slop. With that in mind, we're re-releasing my conversation with Stanford Law professor Daniel Ho on the future of AI and the law. When we look for applications where AI can deliver measurable benefit, the legal profession stands out, both for its potential gains in efficiency and equity, and for how much is at stake if we get it wrong. Dan's research — from using AI to identify racist property covenants buried in county deed records, to mapping obsolete regulations that waste thousands of hours of government time — shows what's possible when the technology is applied with rigor and purpose. If you're curious about how AI can serve both justice and good governance, this one is well worth another listen. Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to thefutureofeverything@stanford.edu. Episode Reference Links: Stanford Profile: Dan Ho Connect With Us: Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon Connect with School of Engineering >>> Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook Chapters: (00:00:00) Introduction Russ Altman introduces guest Dan Ho, a professor of law, political science, and computer science at Stanford University. (00:02:19) Path into Legal AI How Ho's background shaped his interest in law, and technology. (00:03:35) What Lawyers Do What makes law a complex domain for AI. (00:05:28) Legal Hallucinations When AI  performs well and when it fails.  (00:07:52) Searching Legal Records in California How AI can help identify outdated, harmful, or legally important material. (00:10:28) Scaling Redaction How a model accelerated a process that overwhelmed county recorder offices. (00:13:04) Legal Reform at Scale How AI has supported legal reform by scanning massive bodies of law. (00:15:02) STARA & The City of San Francisco How AI was used to go through San Francisco's code and clean up reporting. (00:20:53) Outdated Obligations How “regulatory sludge” takes the time & resources of the public service (00:25:02) Open vs. Closed AI The differences and associated risks of the different AI systems. (00:30:58) Legal Chatbots Why legal chatbots are promising but risky. (00:33:42) Conclusion Connect With Us:Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything WebsiteConnect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / MastodonConnect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As President Trump pushes to pass the SAVE America Act, calls to eliminate the Senate's 60-vote filibuster are once again making headlines. Trey revisits a listener question on whether a future Senate could realistically restore the filibuster if abolished, explaining why history and precedent suggest that once it's gone, it's not coming back. Plus, with Greek mythology taking over the big screen, Trey shares one of his favorite myth-inspired novels. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode InShane and Jason discuss the problem with setting a precedent. And Shane also displays his terrible voice and memory by trying to remember the lyrics to an old show tune.

During this segment of The Charlie James Show, host Charlie James explores the legal mechanics of presidential pardons, arguing that a pardon is a two-way transaction requiring both delivery and acceptance. Referencing historical Supreme Court precedents—such as United States v. Wilson (1833) and Burdick v. United States (1915)—James asserts that accepting a pardon waives Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, whereas refusing or invoking the Fifth Amendment effectively constitutes a rejection of the pardon itself. Connecting these legal principles to Dr. Anthony Fauci's appearance before a Senate committee, James argues that Fauci's refusal to answer questions by invoking the Fifth Amendment signifies a de facto rejection of his presidential pardon, theoretically reopening him to legal prosecution. The segment also features audio clips from Senator Josh Hawley and Senator Bernie Moreno questioning Fauci, followed by James's commentary criticizing the inconsistency of past COVID-19 mandates and public health policies.

Discover entrepreneurship, innovation, business growth, scaling, and intellectual property strategies from successful founders and industry leaders. Richard Gearhart and Elizabeth Gearhart, co-hosts of the Passage to Profit Show interview Leah Solivan from Taskrabbit and Precedent.vc, Nate Amidon from Form100 Consulting and Lauren Hidalgo from Aware House. What does it take to leave the security of a corporate career and build a company that changes how millions of people work? Taskrabbit founder Leah Solivan shares the entrepreneurial mindset that helped her challenge convention, create one of the world's leading technology marketplaces, and ultimately sell the company to IKEA. Now a venture capitalist investing in AI-native startups and and founder of Precedent.vc, Leah explains why outsider thinking fuels innovation, how AI agents are transforming productivity, what founders should know about the future of work, and why the greatest entrepreneurs focus on building lasting impact—not just successful exits. This inspiring conversation is packed with practical insights for entrepreneurs, startup founders, business leaders, and anyone navigating the rapidly changing world of artificial intelligence. Read more at: https://www.leahsolivan.com/ As AI accelerates the pace of business, strong leadership has never been more critical. In this episode, Nate Amidon, Founder and CEO of Form100 Consulting, explains why military-trained leaders are uniquely equipped to help organizations navigate rapid technological change, improve communication, and build high-performing teams. Discover how veterans bring integrity, trust, mission-focused execution, and proven leadership into enterprise technology organizations—and why these skills can help businesses of every size avoid costly mistakes while scaling faster. Read more at: https://www.form100consulting.com/ What if the future of online shopping isn't bigger marketplaces—but smarter ones? Lauren Hidalgo, Founder of Aware House, shares how she built a curated marketplace that helps consumers discover exceptional products from American small businesses while promoting transparent supply chains, sustainability, and authentic craftsmanship. She explains why she chose slow, organic growth over aggressive scaling, how abandoning paid advertising actually improved her business, and why trust, quality, and personal relationships may be the greatest competitive advantages for entrepreneurs in today's marketplace. Read more at: https://awarehouseshop.com/ Whether you're a seasoned entrepreneur, startup founder, inventor, or small business owner, the Passage to Profit Show is a leading podcast for insights on entrepreneurship, innovation, intellectual property and business strategy. Hosted by Richard Gearhart and Elizabeth Gearhart, the show features industry leaders, investors, and founders who share real-world lessons on scaling companies, protecting ideas, building generational wealth, and navigating today's evolving business landscape. Visit https://passagetoprofitshow.com/ for the latest episodes, expert interviews, and resources designed to help you grow, protect, and profit from your ideas. Chapters (00:00:00) - Passing to Profit: How to Get Out of Trap(00:00:22) - Gerhard Law's 20th Anniversary Party(00:03:18) - Happy 4th Anniversary! Helicopters Fly By(00:04:22) - In the Elevator With Leah Sullivan and More(00:05:21) - Decision Made That Changed the Direction of My Business(00:07:06) - Decision Made That Changed the Direction of My Career(00:08:17) - The Decision That Changed the Direction of My Business(00:10:02) - The Branding of Intellectual Property(00:11:33) - In the Elevator With Peter Thiel(00:13:16) - TaskRabbit: IKEA Furniture Jobs(00:13:51) - You Had Planned to Sell TaskRabbit to IKEA(00:14:36) - In the Elevator With Ikea's CEO(00:15:30) - How AI Is Affecting the Future of Work(00:21:54) - What Kind of Companies Are You Investing In?(00:25:56) - Favorite Companies in the United States(00:28:41) - Better Health Insurance for You and Your Family(00:29:41) - Setting New Precedents for Business(00:30:50) - What Motivates People to Take a Different Path?(00:33:08) - Outside the IBM Culture(00:35:11) - Why Business Is So Different For Women(00:36:27) - Coming soon: The Transition to Entrepreneurs(00:39:09) - Real AI Use Cases(00:40:24) - How Microsoft's Copilot is Using AI in Business(00:41:13) - Six Ways Business Owners Are Using AI(00:44:42) - Divorce Debt Relief Hotline(00:47:05) - Intellectual Property News: Site-Blocking(00:51:05) - What is IT Staffing and Execution?(00:53:26) - The Manufacturing-IT Collangage(00:57:12) - The Need for Leadership in the IT Organization(00:59:56) - Leading with Integrity and Accountability(01:02:23) - Does the Military Model Work for Technology Companies?(01:05:01) - What Should an Entrepreneur Do About Veterans?(01:06:40) - Where Everything Clicks: The Aware House Shop(01:11:58) - Where everything clicks: The 'Huckberry' business(01:13:52) - Lauren's Influencers(01:14:49) - Have You Plan to Scale Your Business?(01:17:33) - How Do You Find a Vendor for your Website?(01:18:37) - Aware House Shop: Looking for new products to add(01:20:52) - Passing to Profit(01:22:04) - Noah Fleishman on Dreaming(01:23:32) - Secret of the Entrepreneurial Mind

Can people really change? Or will we always struggle with the same sins, fears, and habits?In Part 3 of our Past Is Not Precedent series, we dive into Romans 6 and discover the incredible truth that Jesus didn't just forgive our sin—He broke its power. Through Christ, you're no longer defined by your past or enslaved to your old life.

What guides your decisions when life isn't black and white? In this message, we explore the biblical principle of precedent—the idea that God's consistent character and timeless truth provide a foundation for how we live today. Throughout Scripture, God establishes principles that bring predictability, trust, and justice, but He also calls us to discern the difference between eternal truths and situational instructions. This sermon tackles several important topics, including: The purpose of biblical precedent Why God's consistency gives us confidence The Ten Commandments as enduring precedent Women in ministry and interpreting difficult passages Divorce, remarriage, spiritual gifts, food laws, and Christian freedom Solomon's wisdom and the question that should guide every decision: "Is it love?" Jesus taught that the greatest commandments are to love God and love others. When we allow the law of love to shape our decisions, we discover the heart behind God's commands and build lives that honor Him. Key Scriptures: • Exodus 20 • Galatians 3:26–28 • Romans 16 • Acts 16, 18 & 21 • Ephesians 5:18 • 1 Kings 3:16–28 • 1 Corinthians 13 If this message encouraged or challenged you, be sure to Like, Subscribe, and Share it with someone who needs hope and biblical wisdom today. #Sermon #BibleTeaching #ChristianLiving #Faith #Jesus #Love #Truth #BiblicalWisdom #KingdomOfGod #Church

What do you do when the pain doesn't go away?Joseph's story reminds us that while our wounds are real, they don't have to rule our lives. In this message, we explore how God meets us in betrayal, injustice, and suffering—and how the gospel frees us from bitterness, teaches us to trust God's justice, and transforms our deepest pain into a testimony of His redeeming grace.Scripture: Genesis 50:15–21

The reasons given for the U.S. launching a war with Iran have shifted over time. But regardless of why the war started, the fighting between the U.S. and Iran is now largely over control of the Strait of Hormuz. Before the war, about a fifth of the world's oil passed freely through the narrow international waterway. Now Iran controls the strait. We look at this threat to the freedom of navigation and whether it sets a a dangerous precedent for other waterways. This episode is Global Affairs Correspondent Jackie Northam's last story for NPR, she is retiring. Jackie has covered world events for NPR for decades from nearly every continent and just about every global conflict. You can hear Jackie reflecting on her remarkable career this recent episode of the Consider This podcast.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

What if the biggest thing holding you back isn't a lack of talent or opportunity—but a rule you've never stopped to question?This week on Entrepreneurial Thinkers, Rob Ryan sits down with entrepreneur, investor, engineer, and TaskRabbit founder Leah Solivan for a conversation that goes far beyond startups and venture capital. Together, they explore the invisible "precedents" that quietly shape our careers, our businesses, and even our identities—and why the people who change the world are often the ones willing to ask a deceptively simple question: Does it really have to be this way?From building and selling one of the companies that helped define the gig economy, TaskRabbit, to IKEA, to launching Precedent VC and championing a new generation of founders, Leah shares how curiosity, independent thinking, and the courage to challenge convention have shaped every chapter of her journey. Whether you're building a business, leading a team, or simply trying to think differently about your own future, this conversation is a reminder that every meaningful breakthrough begins by questioning the assumptions everyone else accepts.Feel free to follow and engage with Leah here:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leahsolivan/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leah_solivan/X: https://x.com/labunleashedWebsite: https://www.leahsolivan.com/precedentvcWe're so grateful to you, our growing audience of entrepreneurs, investors and community leaders interested in the human stories of the Entrepreneurial Thinkers behind entrepreneurial economies worldwide.As always we hope you enjoy each episode and Like, Follow, Subscribe or share with your friends. You can find our shows here, and our new Video Podcast, at “Entrepreneurial Thinkers” channel on YouTube. Plug in, relax and enjoy inspiring, educational and empowering conversations between Rob and our guests.¡Cheers y gracias!,Entrepreneurial Thinkers Team.

Sarah Isgur and David French preview the next Supreme Court term, discuss a dissent from a cert denial on defamation, and consider a few think pieces on the court: Are any of the justices political? Finally, the circuit decision heard ‘round the world: Florida's Stop WOKE Act, stopped by an 11th Circuit panel decision. The Agenda: –Every rose has its thorn –Not-A-Ban on assault weapons coming next term –Text vs. Precedent, field prevention, and climate change-related injuries  –A little boring Title IX is nice for change –Back to Colorado's anti-discrimination cases –An easy parental rights case? –A headline-generating case but a not-so-important legal case –12-person juries and felonies – Actual malice and Alan Dershowitz  –How Political Is This Supreme Court? –STOP Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Show Notes –October Term 2026 –Watch Zachary Shemtob's interview with the National Legal Director of the ACLU, Cecillia Wang, from our term recap event.  Order Sarah's book here. Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including access to all of our articles, members-only newsletters, and bonus podcast episodes—click here. If you'd like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode features an interview with the current Ambassador of Germany to Ireland, David Gill, about his experiences and reflections as a key member of the movement in the early 1990s that preserved and ensured disclosure of the Stasi Records. Ambassador Gill held the positions of Chairman of Normannenstraße Citizens' Committee at the Headquarters of the Ministry of State Security (1990); Head of Administration, Parliamentary Special Committee for the Dissolution of the GDR Ministry of State Security / Office of National Security (1990); and Spokesman and Head of Division of the Federal Commissioner for the Files of the State Security Service of the former GDR (1990-1992). Ambassador Gill is interviewed by Dagmar Hovestädt, Adjunct Professor at the Irish Centre for Human Rights and an internationally recognised expert on archives, human rights, and transitional justice, with over two decades of experience in journalism, strategic communications, and archival research. Formerly Head of Outreach and Research at the Stasi Records Archive in Berlin, Dagmar led major initiatives on public engagement, international collaboration, and the role of archives in addressing past human rights abuses. Dr Maeve O'Rourke, Senior Lecturer at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, also joins the discussion to consider the relevance of the Stasi Records Act to truth-telling in Ireland - particularly in relation to institutional and family separation abuses, the records of which remain largely inaccessible to affected people.

Your past may explain part of your story, but it doesn't have to define your future.In the first message of Past Is Not Precedent, we look at Jesus' encounter with the Samaritan woman in John 4. Her shame, failures, and brokenness seemed to define her identity—until she met Christ. Discover how the gospel offers more than forgiveness; it offers a new identity, a new object of worship, and a redeemed story.

The Supreme Court just wiped out 91 years of precedent, handing one president more unchecked power over federal agencies than any before him. Immigration attorney Allen Orr Jr. joins Dr. Nii-Quartelai Quartey to break down what that means for our communities — plus the Mississippi immigrant registry law taking effect this week, and the Washington state attorney accused of scamming more than 53,000 immigrants out of their futures.

Carl and Mark get into some Falcons talk as they discuss Kyle Pitts getting his new deal which Mark explains he does not understand the move because he believes it was not necessary for the Falcons to be compelled to sign Pitts to a new contract. As Mark explains his stance, he notes he believes there "is no precedent for production" for Pitts to have received his new deal.

Coaster Chronicles is back to kick off the new season of Coaster Cuzzies.Jeffrey Siebert joins us for this episode, but before we get into the full conversation, we catch up on a lot of what's been happening around the theme park world. We talk Universal Kids opening, Tormenta's delay and opening, Disney and SeaWorld experiences, and a few other things along the way.No Storytime this time, but we still had plenty to talk about.

Do Americans truly own their homes and land if the government can continually tax their property—and ultimately take it away when those taxes aren't paid? In this important conversation, Mitch Vexler joins Michael Jaco to discuss a recent court case in Texas and why he believes it could challenge long-standing assumptions about property taxation, government authority, and the constitutional rights of property owners. Mitch examines the legal arguments surrounding property taxes, appraisal districts, foreclosure, government liens, and what he describes as a system that has allowed families to spend their entire lives paying for homes they may never truly own free and clear. The conversation explores the difference between property ownership and perpetual taxation, the constitutional questions being raised in Texas, and whether this legal battle could have implications far beyond one county or one state. Mitch also discusses the importance of citizens understanding how local government, taxation, courts, and property law actually operate—and why peacefully challenging government systems through the courts, public records, and lawful action may be essential to protecting property rights. Could this Texas case expose fundamental problems within America's property tax system? And if successful, could it inspire property owners across the country to begin asking the same questions? This conversation is about property rights, government accountability, constitutional protections, and the growing movement of Americans demanding transparency from the institutions that hold power over their homes, land, and financial futures.

The AI revolution may be fueled by chips, power, and data centers — but behind every billion-dollar development is a complex web of partnerships, risk, capital, and strategy.In this episode of the Nomad Futurist Podcast, co-hosts Nabeel Mahmood and Phillip Koblence sit down with Kim McGrath, Partner at Kirkland & Ellis, whose work places her at the center of some of the most significant digital infrastructure transactions shaping the future of AI and the modern economy.From advising on the landmark take-private of CyrusOne to helping navigate today's unprecedented wave of AI-driven development, Kim has witnessed firsthand how data centers have evolved from a niche asset class into one of the most sought-after sectors in global infrastructure.One of Kim's most compelling observations is that despite the industry's rapid growth, many of today's challenges have no established playbook."Let's keep an open mind and try to really focus in on, ‘What do we see are the risks and how can you solve for those?' It's not the case that this is the way we've always done things. Almost everything in this sector is new."As developers race to meet the demands of AI, Kim discusses the staggering pace of growth, the confidence she continues to see from investors, and why the market still feels like it's only getting started:"Demand we're seeing just grow at light speed. It still almost feels like we're at early innings in these transactions.”The conversation also explores a fundamental shift occurring across the industry: success is no longer determined by any single company. Today's largest projects require unprecedented coordination among developers, hyperscalers, lenders, investors, technology providers, and local communities:"It is 100% a team sport in this arena. You really have to look at the asset through its full life cycle and try to solve as much as possible for that full life cycle. Everybody has got to be hyper-coordinated."Beyond the numbers, Kim offers a thoughtful perspective on the responsibility that comes with building digital infrastructure at scale. As data centers expand into new markets, she argues that community engagement and education must be treated as core components of development — not afterthoughts."I think first and foremost, education. There's a lot of information out there that is misinformation. Really having a high-level focus on education and what's specifically going on at each site is important. Education is really the key."That message resonates deeply with the mission of the Nomad Futurist Foundation. As the industry continues to grow, closing the knowledge gap around digital infrastructure is more important than ever. Through education, awareness, and workforce development initiatives, the Foundation is helping students, communities, and future leaders better understand the critical role data centers play in powering our digital world.Tune in for a fascinating conversation on the evolution of digital infrastructure, the realities of building for the AI era, and why education, collaboration, and trust will be just as important as technology in shaping what comes next.To learn more about Kim McGrath, connect with her on LinkedIn.

1. American Liberty Is Rooted in British Tradition. 1.1. The Magna Carter Was Sealed in 1215. 1.2. The English Civil War Laid the Precedent of Checking the Power of Kings. 1.3. King George III Was Guilty of Tyranny. 2. America Experienced a Revolution in the 1960s. 2.1. Congress Passed the Northwest Ordinance Along with the Constitution in 1787. 2.2. Earl Warren Presided over a Supreme Court that Attempted to Erase America's Christian Heritage. 3. We Are Under the Judgment of God. 4. What Hope Do I Have?

Aside from the significant losses that were handed to him in a series of Supreme Court decisions, President Donald Trump did score one significant victory.The case in question was called Trump v. Slaughter, and the decision in that case bestowed significantly more power and authority not just to Trump, but to the office of the president itself—whoever that may be in the future.Let's go through the details of that case together.

The Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant win Monday by allowing him to remove the leaders of once-independent federal agencies at will, toppling a 1935 precedent in the process that could reorder the way the government functions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

SEND ME A TEXT MESSAGE NOWSome weeks, the biggest political battles don't happen at the White House. They happen inside the Supreme Court, where a handful of justices can reshape presidential power with a single opinion. This week, the Court handed Donald Trump a major victory, surprised just about everyone with another ruling, and reminded the country that the rules can change in ways few people see coming.Then I head to Texas, where millions of public school students will be forced to learn Bible stories in the classroom. Is it history? Is it religion? Is it education? Or is it the latest front in America's never ending culture war? The debate is only getting started.I'll also dig into the latest confusion surrounding Donald Trump's claims about Iran, why the stories coming from both sides don't match, and why that's a much bigger problem than another political headline.Then there's Donald Trump's appeal to the Supreme Court in the long running E. Jean Carroll case. The justices have now issued their decision, putting the case back in the spotlight and making it one of the week's most significant legal developments.I'm convinced we're living through the strangest political experiment of our lifetime. Every week seems determined to outdo the one before it. And we're not even at Fourth of July yet!If you've enjoyed the podcast and found it informative, and maybe got a laugh or two, then please contribute to keeping this podcast around. I'm not backed by Corporate media. There is no outside money other than my own wallet so if you could please contribute to the GoFundMe below even a small donation makes a difference.https://gofund.me/5d9a419efAWorldGoneMadPodcast@gmail.com

Hr 3 - Austin Price joins the show + Dusty May sets a new precedent for NBASee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hr 3 - Austin Price joins the show + Dusty May sets a new precedent for NBASee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Part 4 of Setting Precedent: The Right to Protest on Campus - a podcast miniseries that tells the whole story behind the lawsuit activists have launched against the University of Calgary and the Calgary Police in response to an encampment eviction on the campus back in May 2024.Dr. Roberta Lexier, an expert of student movements in Canada, explains why institutions like the University of Calgary are responding to peaceful protests with such hostility. She provides historical context for the shifting relationship between student activists and their, now "neoliberal corporatist" universities.She's also points to examples from campuses, and makes the case that post-secondary schools across Canada are becoming increasily intolerant of the very activists they helped create. Although the Palestinian exception weighs heavily on how universities (and Police) approach protests, Dr, Lexier talks about many other factors that play into what student movements are up against these days.If you missed the first (3) three parts - they can be listened to in any order.Part 1 featured Dr. Raheleh Tarani and her story of participating in the peaceful protest with her son one minute, and being pinned by police the next. We heard about the impact that had on her, and how she's reclaiming power through the court.Part 2: Liaising with Police - Calgary based activist Wesam Cooley talks about his role as the encampment's police liaison, and what its been like trying to hold police and other parties accountable in Alberta.Part 3: Charter Violations - Legal counsel for the nine Plaintiffs, Chris Weibe, on the merits of the case, what a victory would mean, and what its like going after the state on behalf of activists.Hosted by: Jessa McLean and Santiago Helou QuinteroCall to Action: DONATE TO THE LEGAL FUND FOR THE PLAINTIFFSRelated Episodes: Student Hunger Strike - Its Only a Matter of Time (Apr 2025) UBC & UBCO student activists talk about their hunger strike and other efforts to have their University divest from weapons manufacturers. Holding Institutions Accountable (Oct 2025)More Resources: More of our content is available on our SUBSTACK.All of our content is free - made possible by the generous sponsorships of our Patrons. If you would like to support our work through monthly contributions: PatreonFollow us on Instagram or on Bluesky

Send us Fan MailNo crew. No guardrails. Just Aaron on a members-only mic doing what he does best—thinking out loud and lighting fires. This episode is an end-of-year wrap that turns into a manifesto: why fitness is a moral obligation, why “peaceful” without capability is a lie, and how attribute-based selection actually works when the slogans stop. Aaron breaks down why OTS waited, why it's scaling fast, and why 2026 is about to get wild—including international moves. Then he unloads on the Venezuela boat story, media hysteria, political hypocrisy, and why precedent matters more than pearl-clutching. If you're looking for polished takes, you're lost. If you want clarity without comfort, press play.⏱️ Timestamps:00:00 Aaron Solo, Members Only02:15 Fitness, Violence, and Real Virtue05:00 Attribute-Based Selection Explained08:30 Why OTS Exists and Why It Waited12:45 Going International & Ego Management16:00 Zulu Course Reality Check20:00 Venezuela Boat Story and Media Panic27:30 Precedent, Power, and Hard Truths30:00 2026 Direction & Final Shots

The bipartisan support for a contempt vote against the Clintons was not a sudden outbreak of moral clarity in Washington, but a calculated strategic move. Democrats understand that precedent is everything, and by allowing scrutiny of figures within their own party, they are laying the groundwork to pursue Donald Trump once he is out of office. Sacrificing the old guard sends a message that no one is untouchable, which strengthens the argument for future investigations into Trump on issues including Jeffrey Epstein. This is less about loyalty and more about long-term positioning. By demonstrating a willingness to hold their own accountable, Democrats insulate themselves from accusations of hypocrisy when they eventually turn their focus toward Trump.At the same time, Epstein survivors risk once again being sidelined in a broader political chess match. While Democrats frame their actions as a pursuit of justice, the deeper motivation appears tied to strategic leverage rather than survivor-centered accountability. Republicans gain spectacle, Democrats gain precedent, and both parties maneuver for advantage. Meanwhile, the people most harmed by Epstein's crimes are invoked rhetorically but remain secondary to partisan objectives. The result is a familiar pattern: power politics driving the narrative, while true systemic accountability remains elusive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

He informed the university after his 90-day probationary employment period expired that he wanted to “identify as female.” Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

The government claims its new Conservation Amendment Bill will improve protections of conservation land while also enabling more economic growth. Its opponents say the bill will undermine existing protections, however, especially as it enables the sale of large swathes of conservation land into private ownership. This would also undermine existing legal protections for land specifically in the Coromandel, which alongside the Fast Track Bill illustrates this government's intention to entirely circumvent many of New Zealand's long-standing environmental policies. To discuss the Conservation Amendment Bill, what makes it an interesting policy, and how it could end up affecting local conservation efforts in the region, News Director Castor spoke to Chair of Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki, Catherine Delahunty. You can make a submission on the bill here. Submissions close at midnight on the second of July. 

Todd Fuhrman joined 3HL to talk the best bets in NASCAR, the NHL Finals, the NBA Finals and give his take on the Brendan Sorsby ruling as a bettor.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Todd Fuhrman joined 3HL to talk the best bets in NASCAR, the NHL Finals, the NBA Finals and give his take on the Brendan Sorsby ruling as a bettor.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

6.8.26, Kevin Sheehan reacts to the Brendan Sorsby ruling allowing him to play College Football next season after originally being deemed ineligible due to gambling.

Brendan Sorsby ruling sets poor precedent.

DOCKET ALERTS:   Kash Patel brings UFC to FBI. WTF???   A federal judge in Maryland issued a TRO blocking the construction of an ICE detention facility without first undertaking the legally required environmental impact assessment.   The Trump administration filed an "emergency" petition to the Supreme Court demanding that it be allowed to immediately deport 350,000 Haitians who have enjoyed Temporary Protected Status for decades. It insists an earlier shadow docket ruling allowing it to deport Venezuelan TPS holders is precedential. An amicus brief from 175 former judges points out that shadow docket orders are definitionally non-precedential.   The USDA is teaming up with Robert Kennedy and his team of freaks at Health and Human Services to Make America Healthy Again … by shaming poor people for their food choices. SNAP recipients sued in DC to block a "pilot" program to allow states to restrict food benefits to exclude sugary foods.   MAIN SHOW:   DOGE destroyed the National Endowment for the Humanities in three weeks last spring. We wrote about it on the blog, and discussed the ongoing litigation. Turns out, the DOGE dudes are pissed that the plaintiffs released video of them smirking their way through depositions.   On Monday, in the middle of trial, the Trump administration tried to blow up the antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation, the parent company of Ticketmaster. This leaves the 40 states which joined the suit as co-plaintiffs in the lurch. Judge Arun Subramanian has ordered the parties to huddle up and see if they can't negotiate a settlement. Will the case go forward next week without the lead plaintiff?   And Andrew has an extended exploration of Trump's plan to use a little known federal agency called the United States International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) to get oil tankers to cross the Strait of Hormuz. The DFC has released a plan (or at least, concepts of a plan) to reinsure insurance companies that issue war riders. Which might help if insurance companies were refusing to issue policies to ships at sea – except that insurance companies are still underwriting as many marine policies as ever. It's just that it costs more now, because of the war.   Plus for subscribers, we'll break down the bar complaint against fan favorite Ed Martin.   Kash Patel Confirms UFC Fighters Will Train FBI Agents This Week, Calling It A "Historic Opportunity" https://deadline.com/2026/03/kash-patel-ufc-fighters-train-fbi-agents-1236750897/   State of Maryland v. Noem [ICE Detention Center in Hagerstown] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72313096/state-of-maryland-v-noem   Lesly Miot v. Trump [Haitian TPS, Trial Docket] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70965949/lesly-miot-v-trump/   Trump v. Miot [SCOTUS Docket] https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25a999.html   DOGE Bros Had More Fun Burning Down Government Than Testifying About It https://www.lawandchaospod.com/p/doge-bros-had-more-fun-burning-down   Authors Guild v. National Endowment for the Humanities https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70243086/the-authors-guild-v-national-endowment-for-the-humanities   Amicus Brief of 175 Former Judges re Precedent of Shadow Docket Rulings https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25A952/400077/20260305142419318_Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Former%20Judges%20re%20Dahlia%20Doe_FINAL.pdf   Aragon v. Rollins [SNAP Benefits] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72419889/aragon-v-rollins/   DOJ nopes out of Ticketmaster antitrust suit https://www.publicnotice.co/p/ticketmaster-suit-doj   US v. Live Nation https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68557723/united-states-of-america-v-live-nation-entertainment-inc   Trump's 'free flow of energy' vow fails to restart shipping in strait of Hormuz [The Guardian] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/10/trump-free-flow-energy-fails-restart-shipping-strait-hormuz   DFC Reinsurance announcement [US International Development Finance Corporation] https://www.dfc.gov/media/press-releases/dfc-announces-chubb-lead-insurance-partner-maritime-reinsurance-plan   Gulf war risk premiums topping double-digit millions of dollars per trip [Lloyd's List] https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1156586/Gulf-war-risk-premiums-topping-double-digit-millions-of-dollars-per-trip   No, P&I clubs have not 'cancelled war risk cover' [Lloyd's List] https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1156515/No-PI-clubs-have-not-cancelled-war-risk-cover   Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod  

0:00 - The Nashville Predators hired Chris MacFarland to be their President of Hockey Operations and General Manager. Joe Sakic will now be the Avs GM "for the foreseeable future." How long is the "foreseeable future"? Do the Avalanche even need to hire a new GM or can they let Sakic re-take the reigns entirely? Also, if the roster doesn't need that much tweaking to begin with, do they need a brand new GM? You know Sakic was involved with every decision Chris MacFarland signed off on anyway.(Also, for what it's worth, the song I bumped in with was "I Like It, I Love It" by Tim McGraw)17:54 - The Broncos paid PSII a cool $5 million bonus yesterday. It's good work if you can get it! But the problem is...does that set a precedent? How good does a Broncos player need to be to earn a bonus? Are other guys on the defense going to be jealous?31:43 - Oh, by the way...former Angles/Orioles outfielder Jordyn Adams is leaving pro baseball to go...back to college? He was a 5-star WR recruit in 2018. He's now a 26-year-old freshman at SMU.Oh, by the way...TJ "Donald Rumsfeld" Rumfield hit a home run that only cleared the wall because it bounced off Jo Adell's head. The ol' Jose Canseco special.Oh, by the way...Steph Curry just signed a $400 million, 10-year shoe deal with a Chinese company called Li-Ning. 

This Day in Legal History: The National Defense Act of 1916On this day in 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Defense Act, the law that quietly built the legal scaffolding for how the United States deploys soldiers, both abroad and at home, for the next century-plus. The Act roughly tripled the size of the regular Army, formally created the National Guard as a federalized reserve force out of the patchwork of state militias that had existed since the founding, and established the Reserve Officers' Training Corps at colleges and universities. The legal hook is the dual-status structure that the Act created and that we still use today: the National Guard belongs simultaneously to its state and to the federal government, normally takes orders from the governor, but can be “federalized” by the President under specific statutory authorities and pulled out of state command for federal missions. That structure has driven a long line of constitutional fights about the limits of presidential authority to call up the Guard, about whether and when the Insurrection Act applies, and about how the Posse Comitatus Act constrains the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement. June 3 is not a day most people associate with American military law, but the 1916 statute is doing quiet work behind every modern headline about troops at a border, troops in a city, or troops in a hurricane.The Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday handed down a ruling that strips hip-hop group 2 Live Crew of the copyrights it thought it had successfully clawed back to five of its albums, including “As Nasty as They Wanna Be,” because one member's bankruptcy from the 1990s swept his future termination rights into the bankruptcy estate. Federal copyright law has a wonderfully democratic provision in Section 203: an author who signed away a copyright can, 35 years later, send a termination notice and take it back, regardless of what the original contract said. The catch the Eleventh Circuit identified is Section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, which scoops up almost everything you own into the bankruptcy estate when you file — including, the court said, the right to send that termination notice years later, even though the right cannot be sold or contracted away in any other context. The practical consequence for 2 Live Crew is that member Mark Ross, who performed as Brother Marquis, had unwittingly transferred his future termination interests to his bankruptcy trustee when he filed Chapter 7 years earlier, so when the group's heirs and surviving members later tried to take the copyrights back from Lil' Joe Records in 2020, they were one vote short of the majority the statute requires. The case, Lil' Joe Records v. Christopher Won Jr. et al., No. 24-13978, is described in the opinion as “a question of first impression at the intersection of copyright and bankruptcy” — which is lawyer-speak for “we just made up the rule, and now it's the rule.” Expect every copyright-termination case where any author has ever filed for bankruptcy to cite this decision for the next decade.11th Circ. Reverses 2 Live Crew's Copyright Clawback Win | Law360President Trump on Tuesday quietly signed a finalized version of the AI cybersecurity executive order that he had abruptly scrapped during a planned signing ceremony on May 21, and the final version is notably narrower than the one that was on the table a month ago. The new order asks Treasury, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and other federal agencies to design a voluntary framework under which developers of so-called frontier AI models — the largest and most general-purpose systems — would share their models with the federal government for up to 30 days before public release so the government can scan for security vulnerabilities. The legal posture is worth pausing on: this is a voluntary framework, not a regulation, which means it lives in the same constitutional space as a chamber-of-commerce best-practices document rather than as a binding rule subject to APA notice and comment. That structure is partly a workaround for the fact that there is no federal statute giving any agency authority to mandate pre-release safety testing of AI models, and partly a response to industry pressure: Trump explained on May 21 that he scrapped the earlier 90-day version because he thought it could be “a blocker” to U.S. leadership in AI. Whether developers actually opt in is the open question, and the order is structured so that participation will likely depend on a mix of national-security pressure, federal procurement leverage, and quiet diplomacy with the major labs. Expect the first real fight to be over what counts as a “frontier” model, and who decides.Finalized Trump Order Seeks Early Cyber Tests Of AI Models | Law360The U.S. Senate on Tuesday confirmed Katie Lane to be a federal district judge in Montana, making her the first judicial nominee of Trump's second term to be confirmed despite a “not qualified” rating from the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary. The ABA's role here is informal but historically important: since 1953 the Standing Committee has rated federal judicial nominees as “well qualified,” “qualified,” or “not qualified” based on professional competence, integrity, and judicial temperament, and the rating has carried real weight with senators of both parties — until it didn't. The Trump administration formally cut ties with the ABA review process during the first term, on the theory that the ABA's ratings reflected an ideological bias against conservative nominees, and the second administration has been even more open about ignoring “not qualified” ratings as a matter of policy. The legal stakes of this are modest in any individual case — a “not qualified” judge serves the same lifetime appointment with the same constitutional power as a “well qualified” one — but cumulatively the practice changes the relationship between the bar and the bench in a way that is hard to undo, and it nudges the federal judiciary in a direction that depends almost entirely on the political branches' definitions of professional fitness. Lane, who is now confirmed, will join the District of Montana, a small but busy bench. Watch this space: there are several more nominees in the pipeline with similar ratings.US Senate confirms Trump judicial nominee deemed ‘not qualified' by ABA | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

This is Part 3 of our series that tells the whole story behind the lawsuit activists have launched against the University of Calgary and the Calgary Police in response to an encampment eviction on the campus back in May 2024.Legal Counsel for the nine Plaintiffs, Chris Weibe joins us to talk about the merits of the case, and just how people's Charter Rights were violated. We ask him what a victory in this case would look like, for the Plaintiffs AND other activists facing similar situations. Weibe also gives some insight on what its like going after the state on behalf of activists.Be sure to also check out...Part 1: Raheleh's Story - Dr. Tarani tells her story of participating in the peaceful protest with her son one minute, and being pinned by police the next. We heard about the impact that had on her, and how she's reclaiming power through the court.Part 2: Liaising with Police - Calgary based activist Wesam Cooley talks about his role as the encampment's police liaison, and what its been like trying to hold police and other parties accountable in Alberta.Hosted and by Jessa McLean and Santiago Helou QuinteroCall to Action: DONATE TO THE LEGAL FUND FOR THE PLAINTIFFSOther Related Episodes:Student Suppression by Any Means with Jeremy Appel (March 2025)Student Encampments (May 2024) a look at their demands for divestment, the responses from the Universities, the police and the public.More Resources: Calgary Police, City of Calgary and University of Calgary sued by demonstrators - via DrugDataDecoded.ca(REFERENCED) Statement of Claim: May 2026More of our content is available on our SUBSTACK.All of our content is free - made possible by the generous sponsorships of our Patrons. If you would like to support our work through monthly contributions: PatreonFollow us on Instagram or on Bluesky

Could a New York court really declare 3.8 million dormant Bitcoin — including coins linked to Satoshi — as "abandoned property"? This week the Bitcoin Policy Institute team dissects an anonymous lawsuit built on an obscure lost-and-found statute, and explains why the legal theory is weak but the precedent could be devastating. Ken Egan, Zack Shapiro, and Zack Cohen also cover the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) after its Senate Banking Committee markup and the surprising opposition from sheriffs' associations. Alex Thorn Article about New York case attempting to seize bitcoin:https://www.galaxy.com/insights/research/satoshi-bitcoin-salomon-brothers-patoshi-abandoned-property-new-york-noah-doe-lawsuitForeign Influence on AIhttps://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/foreign-influence-in-the-campaign-against-american-ai

The Trump administration permanently banned the IRS from auditing the president's tax returns, and those of his sons, his company or any affiliated trust. That move was announced a day after the creation of a $1.8 billion fund to compensate allies of Trump who claim they were mistreated by the Biden Justice Department. Geoff Bennett discussed more with former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

Edmund Fitton-Brown analyzes the "ragged" maritime blockade between the U.S. and Iran in the Strait of Hormuz. He warns that allowing Iran to claim control over international waterways sets a dangerous global precedent and suggests Iran believes it can outlast American resolve. (11/16)1944 OGIKUBO TALK

Will the Supreme Court overturn religious precedent in the case of a Catholic preschool challenging its exclusion from a Colorado “universal preschool” program? Should the Supreme Court care about its own popularirty? And, is Ted Cruz a great option as for Supreme Court justice? Sarah Isgur and David French answer these questions and more, live at the University of Denver.Also: We are launching a SCOTUSblog newsletter on April 28!The Agenda:–‘Universal' pre-K causes court to re-re-reconsider major religious precedent–This already happened–Public Opinion, Credible Threats, and the Fezzik Principle–Watch The Princess Bride–Justice Ted Cruz?–The Shadow Docket reporting by the New York Times–Questions from the audience Order Sarah's book here.Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including access to all of our articles, members-only newsletters, and bonus podcast episodes—click here. If you'd like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On March 31st of this year, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a therapist in Colorado who argued that the state's ban on conversion therapy violated her freedom of speech. While the ruling does not endorse conversion therapy, it does allow the practice to continue, despite the fact that conversion therapy has been widely debunked as pseudoscience and dramatically increases the risk of depression and suicide in queer and trans youth. To understand the ruling and its impact, we hear from Mother Jones reporter Madison Pauly, who has been following the insidious rise of anti-trans conversion therapy, and Shannon Minter, the Legal Director of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, who has been at the forefront of the legal battles for queer and trans rights for decades. This week's Trans Joy features River King, a registered nurse at a queer community clinic in Brooklyn, NY.Send your trans joy recommendations to translash_podcast @ translash [dot] org Follow TransLash Media @translashmedia on TikTok, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky, and Facebook.Follow Imara Jones on Instagram (@Imara_jones_), Threads (@imara_jones_), Bluesky (@imarajones.bsky.social), X (@ImaraJones)Check out our guests on social media: National Center for LGBTQ Rights @nclrightsMadison PaulyBluesky: @msjpauly.bsky.socialRiver King Instagram: @riv.king Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.