Podcasts about john hospers

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th Century philosopher and political activist John Hospers' essay "What Libertarianism Is" It focuses specifically on his views on the limited role government should play, mainly focused on protecting rights, and the impacts and implications this would have for businesses and individuals To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler You can get a copy of the text here - http://public.callutheran.edu/~chenxi/phil315_101.pdf

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th Century philosopher and political activist John Hospers' essay "What Libertarianism Is" It focuses specifically on his discussion of the three rights he takes as fundamental, i.e. the right to maintain one's life, the right to maintain one's liberty or freedom, and the right to one's own property. These supersede and structure all other moral considerations for the libertarian. To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 2000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler You can get a copy of the text here - http://public.callutheran.edu/~chenxi/phil315_101.pdf

Tonie Nathan, one of the founders of today's Libertarian Party, was also the party's first-ever vice-presidential candidate when she ran with John Hospers in the election that gave us "four more years" of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew. (Eugene, Lane County; 1970s) (For text and pictures, see http://offbeatoregon.com/o1103d-eugene-woman-first-female-vp-nominee-to-win-vote.html)

121421 Dr. Ronald Kimberling Author Libertarianism John Hospers 50 Year Annv by Kate Dalley

This week, we start by talking recording tools and applications of plugins for simplifying and coloring in the sonic field, before wandering off to parts unknown! ---Links to check out related to us and our conversation..."The Age Of Spiritual Machines" by Ray Kurzweilhttps://www.amazon.com/Age-Spiritual-Machines-Computers-Intelligence/dp/0140282025“Transcendent Man” - Ray Kurzweil Documentaryhttps://www.imdb.com/title/tt1117394/Kurzweil on Wiki:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_KurzweilFXpansion BFD3 Drums:https://www.fxpansion.com/news/bfd-migration-inmusic/Universal Audio's Lexicon 224 Reverb Plugin:https://www.uaudio.com/uad-plugins/reverbs/lexicon-224.htmlUniversal Audio's AMS RMX16 Reverb Plugin:https://www.uaudio.com/uad-plugins/reverbs/rmx-16-expanded.htmlValhalla Reverb:https://valhalladsp.com/shop/reverb/valhalla-vintage-verb/“A Dialog On Personal Identity And Immortality” by John Perry:https://books.google.com/books/about/A_Dialogue_on_Personal_Identity_and_Immo.html?id=m8tgDwAAQBAJ“Meaning And Free Will” by John Hospers:https://consequent2017.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/hospers-ph-ph-r-1950.pdfOblique Strategies app:https://apps.apple.com/us/app/oblique-productive-strategies/id902143877Oblique Strategies Deck on Amazon:https://www.amazon.com/Oblique-strategies-hundred-worthwhile-dilemmas/dp/B0000EEZG9---Dee & Michael:Michael Hateley Lotus Masteringhttp://lotusmastering.com/  Extra Fancy "You Look Like a Movie Star" videohttps://youtu.be/0pE1TqlWHCk Baldyloks (Michael Hateley & John Napier) https://soundcloud.com/baldyloks-1Dee Maddenhttps://www.deemadden.com/ Penal Colony “Blue 9” videohttps://youtu.be/Fes9E3ea8FYDee on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/artist/4jsYxJ4QxzoGn9t0HRllPk 

Tonie Nathan, one of the founders of today's Libertarian Party, was also the party's first-ever vice-presidential candidate when she ran with John Hospers in the election that gave us "four more years" of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew. (Eugene, Lane County; 1972) (For text and pictures, see http://offbeatoregon.com/o1103d-eugene-woman-first-female-vp-nominee-to-win-vote.html)

Why is the Libertarian Party Statement of Principles so important? Caryn Ann continues a three-part series on the LP and the Enduring Importance of the Statement of Principles. If you want the background on the history and meaning of this very important document, you don’t want to miss this trilogy of episodes. Make sure to start with the first episode of this trilogy and listen to all three to get the most benefit from this. Article with all of the various proposed readings of the Statement of Principles: http://lpedia.org/Statement_of_Principles Article on Dallas Accord: http://lpedia.org/Dallas_Accord Marked up copy demonstrating Dallas Accord changes in the Statement of Principles: http://lpedia.org/w/images/7/77/Dallas_Accord_Statement_of_Principles.pdf Article on Toni Nathan: http://lpedia.org/Tonie_Nathan Article on John Hospers: https://lpedia.org/John_Hospers Original recordings of 1972 Convention: https://lpedia.org/National_Convention_1972

The philosopher (and 1972 presidential candidate) John Hospers once wrote, “justice is getting what one deserves. What could be simpler?” As it turns out, this seemingly simple idea is in the opinion of many contemporary political philosophers complicated enough to be implausible. According to many these theorists, the question of what one deserves is no less vexed than the question of what justice requires. Some even hold that the question of what one deserves can be answered only by reference to a conception of justice. Accordingly, it seems as if a defense of Hospers’ simple idea requires a lot of effort. In Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve from Our Country (Oxford University Press, 2016), Fred Feldman provides an original version of desertism, the view according to which justice prevails in a society when all of its members get what they deserve from whatever entity has the job of enacting justice. He forcefully argues that, once it is articulated with the requisite nuance and precision, desertism is an attractive conception of distributive justice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher (and 1972 presidential candidate) John Hospers once wrote, “justice is getting what one deserves. What could be simpler?” As it turns out, this seemingly simple idea is in the opinion of many contemporary political philosophers complicated enough to be implausible. According to many these theorists, the question of what one deserves is no less vexed than the question of what justice requires. Some even hold that the question of what one deserves can be answered only by reference to a conception of justice. Accordingly, it seems as if a defense of Hospers’ simple idea requires a lot of effort.  In Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve from Our Country (Oxford University Press, 2016), Fred Feldman provides an original version of desertism, the view according to which justice prevails in a society when all of its members get what they deserve from whatever entity has the job of enacting justice. He forcefully argues that, once it is articulated with the requisite nuance and precision, desertism is an attractive conception of distributive justice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher (and 1972 presidential candidate) John Hospers once wrote, “justice is getting what one deserves. What could be simpler?” As it turns out, this seemingly simple idea is in the opinion of many contemporary political philosophers complicated enough to be implausible. According to many these theorists, the question of... Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher (and 1972 presidential candidate) John Hospers once wrote, “justice is getting what one deserves. What could be simpler?” As it turns out, this seemingly simple idea is in the opinion of many contemporary political philosophers complicated enough to be implausible. According to many these theorists, the question of what one deserves is no less vexed than the question of what justice requires. Some even hold that the question of what one deserves can be answered only by reference to a conception of justice. Accordingly, it seems as if a defense of Hospers’ simple idea requires a lot of effort. In Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve from Our Country (Oxford University Press, 2016), Fred Feldman provides an original version of desertism, the view according to which justice prevails in a society when all of its members get what they deserve from whatever entity has the job of enacting justice. He forcefully argues that, once it is articulated with the requisite nuance and precision, desertism is an attractive conception of distributive justice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher (and 1972 presidential candidate) John Hospers once wrote, “justice is getting what one deserves. What could be simpler?” As it turns out, this seemingly simple idea is in the opinion of many contemporary political philosophers complicated enough to be implausible. According to many these theorists, the question of what one deserves is no less vexed than the question of what justice requires. Some even hold that the question of what one deserves can be answered only by reference to a conception of justice. Accordingly, it seems as if a defense of Hospers' simple idea requires a lot of effort. In Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve from Our Country (Oxford University Press, 2016), Fred Feldman provides an original version of desertism, the view according to which justice prevails in a society when all of its members get what they deserve from whatever entity has the job of enacting justice. He forcefully argues that, once it is articulated with the requisite nuance and precision, desertism is an attractive conception of distributive justice.