Podcast appearances and mentions of david redlawsk

The House Republicans Unanimous Evidence-Free Vote For Biden's Impeachment | How Hungary's Crooked Despot Viktor Orban is Blackmailing the EU | Efforts To Reform FISA as Section 702 is Tucked Into the $886 Billion NDAA backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

Trump Faces Jeopardy From Reconstruction Era Laws | Trump Warned Not to Turn January 6 Trial Into a Carnival | After 5 Decades in Public Office the So-Called Head of the "Biden Crime Family" Has No Charges Against Him, Unlike the Head of the Trump Crime Family backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

The Democrats Change Their Presidential Primary Nominating Calendar for 2024 | Why has Such a Small Man as Putin Had a Disproportionate Impact on the World Stage? backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

Jonathan Alward, CFIB, on small business looking for more help from the province (1:30); Peter Edwards from the Toronto Star on how even organized crime is being affected by COVID-19 (8:10); Winnipeg Harvest changes their delivery model (18:50); The view from the U.S. with David Redlawsk (25:00); The Final Word (37:45). 

Guests: Rick Perlstein is a historian, journalist, and author of several books such as Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America;  The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan. And his newest to be yet published in August this year Reaganland: America's Right Turn 1976-1980.   David Redlawsk is James R. Soles Professor of Political SciencePolitical Science and International Relations at the University of Delaware. He is author of several books including Why Iowa?: How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve the Presidential Nominating Process.  And his new book to be out in Spring is A Citizen's Guide to the Political Psychology of Voting.   The post History of Legislative Reforms After Nixon & The Iowa Caucus appeared first on KPFA.

Less than one week to go, and it's anyone's guess who will win the Iowa Caucuses. What's the biggest thing on Iowans' minds as they decide? Impeachment? Electability? Personal likability? Caucus expert and political scientist David Redlawsk , who has spent the last six months on sabbatical in Iowa, talks us through what to expect on Feb. 3. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Barr Blames Apple, Not the Saudi Education and Religious Establishment; Will the Four Front-Runners Be Evenly Divided All the Way to the Convention?; Will Candidates Be Asked How They Would Actually Do the Job of Being President?

Trump's Actions in Ukraine Serve Putin's Interest, Not America's; AG Barr's Opus Dei Agenda Threatens the US Constitution's Separation of Church and State; An Analysis of Mayer Pete's Surge in Iowa backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

NOVEMBER 8, 2019―The University of Delaware's Center for Political Communication, in a partnership with Delaware Public Media (www.delawarepublic.org), examines where we’ve been, where we are going, and the current state of democracy in the United States. On this episode, Delaware Public Media news director Tom Byrne is joined by the UDCPC associate director/National Agenda series director Lindsay Hoffman and UD Dept. of Political Science and International Relations chair David Redlawsk, who was in Iowa this fall following the Presidential race. They discuss what Redlawsk is seeing in Iowa, the impact the impeachment inquiry into President Trump could have on voters there and elswhere, and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's visit to UD to speak as part of the Direction Democracy National Agenda series. Listen to this podcast on Delaware Public Media's The Green: https://www.delawarepublic.org/post/direction-democracy-podcast-presidential-politics-iowa.

Iowa plays a big role in presidential politics because of its first in the nation caucuses. Even by that standard, though, this time around feels busier, and the Iowa State Fair has been flooded with candidates for offices from the presidency on down. We talked to David Redlawsk, a political psychologist who is spending his ENTIRE sabbatical in Iowa, about why this is all happening. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

MARCH 9, 2018―The University of Delaware's Center for Political Communication, in partnership with Delaware Public Media (www.delawarepublic.org), explores the national and local issues emerging with the upcoming midterm election. Host Tom Byrne speaks with CPC Associate Director Lindsay Hoffman and David Redlawsk, chair of the University of Delaware's Department of Political Science and International Relations. To learn more about the University of Delaware's National Agenda program, please visit www.udel.edu/nationalagenda.

Kyle Mattes and David Redlawsk are the authors of The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning (University of Chicago Press, 2014). Mattes is assistant professor of political science at Florida International University; Redlawsk is professor of political science at the Eagleton Institute's Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University. Each campaign season, a near public consensus is reached that everybody hates negative campaign ads. But do we all agree with what actually constitutes a negative ad and does that matter? Mattes and Redlawsk investigate the paradox of nearly universal hatred of negative ads yet persistent use by candidates. How can these two be? In the book, Mattes and Redlawsk designed a series of experiments to figure out what is it about negativity that voters truly dislike. In doing so, they separate ads that merely refer to a campaign opponent from those that criticize family and personal characteristics. What they discover will help anyone interested in politics better understand the way campaign communications actually works. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kyle Mattes and David Redlawsk are the authors of The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning (University of Chicago Press, 2014). Mattes is assistant professor of political science at Florida International University; Redlawsk is professor of political science at the Eagleton Institute’s Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University. Each campaign season, a near public consensus is reached that everybody hates negative campaign ads. But do we all agree with what actually constitutes a negative ad and does that matter? Mattes and Redlawsk investigate the paradox of nearly universal hatred of negative ads yet persistent use by candidates. How can these two be? In the book, Mattes and Redlawsk designed a series of experiments to figure out what is it about negativity that voters truly dislike. In doing so, they separate ads that merely refer to a campaign opponent from those that criticize family and personal characteristics. What they discover will help anyone interested in politics better understand the way campaign communications actually works. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kyle Mattes and David Redlawsk are the authors of The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning (University of Chicago Press, 2014). Mattes is assistant professor of political science at Florida International University; Redlawsk is professor of political science at the Eagleton Institute’s Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University. Each campaign season, a near public consensus is reached that everybody hates negative campaign ads. But do we all agree with what actually constitutes a negative ad and does that matter? Mattes and Redlawsk investigate the paradox of nearly universal hatred of negative ads yet persistent use by candidates. How can these two be? In the book, Mattes and Redlawsk designed a series of experiments to figure out what is it about negativity that voters truly dislike. In doing so, they separate ads that merely refer to a campaign opponent from those that criticize family and personal characteristics. What they discover will help anyone interested in politics better understand the way campaign communications actually works. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kyle Mattes and David Redlawsk are the authors of The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning (University of Chicago Press, 2014). Mattes is assistant professor of political science at Florida International University; Redlawsk is professor of political science at the Eagleton Institute’s Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University. Each campaign season, a near public consensus is reached that everybody hates negative campaign ads. But do we all agree with what actually constitutes a negative ad and does that matter? Mattes and Redlawsk investigate the paradox of nearly universal hatred of negative ads yet persistent use by candidates. How can these two be? In the book, Mattes and Redlawsk designed a series of experiments to figure out what is it about negativity that voters truly dislike. In doing so, they separate ads that merely refer to a campaign opponent from those that criticize family and personal characteristics. What they discover will help anyone interested in politics better understand the way campaign communications actually works. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices