Podcasts about reforms

What should we think of Cuba's history with reforms? Good? Bad? More complicated than that? Let's sit down and discuss.Support the show on Patreon - get up to 3 exclusive episodes a month, discord access, merch discounts and plenty more - check it out: https://www.patreon.com/TheDeprogramBUY THE NEW MERCH - PATRONS GET 10% OFF - https://deprogramshop.com/Support the showSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TheDeprogramFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDeprogramPod

Whether it is a cute animal, a new dance, or a delicious recipe, there is no shortage of viral moments shown to you on TikTok. Now the newest trend: regional accents.What exactly is driving this latest trend?Just as car accidents and plane crashes can have deadly consequences, so do train derailments.Reforms are being made to how train companies are required to handle hazardous materials so that communities located by train routes can have peace of mind.Prime Day, one of the largest shopping events of the year, starts on Tuesday. How can people make the most of it?Does AI have the wisdom to help people fix their relationship issues? Most people don't think so.Thinking about buying a new iPhone? It's time to start saving, because prices are expected to increase.Guests:Shane O'Neill, journalist, The Washington PostJess Conard, executive director, Rail WatchRussell Holly, director of commerce content, CNET

Whether it is a cute animal, a new dance, or a delicious recipe, there is no shortage of viral moments shown to you on TikTok. Now the newest trend: regional accents.What exactly is driving this latest trend?Just as car accidents and plane crashes can have deadly consequences, so do train derailments.Reforms are being made to how train companies are required to handle hazardous materials so that communities located by train routes can have peace of mind.Prime Day, one of the largest shopping events of the year, starts on Tuesday. How can people make the most of it?Does AI have the wisdom to help people fix their relationship issues? Most people don't think so.Thinking about buying a new iPhone? It's time to start saving, because prices are expected to increase.Guests:Shane O'Neill, journalist, The Washington PostJess Conard, executive director, Rail WatchRussell Holly, director of commerce content, CNET

Labor's capital gains tax and negative gearing reforms to pass, after a deal with the Greens.

Federal Parliament has returned for two final sitting weeks before a five-week long winter recess. Twin fights over proposed tax reform and an overhaul to the National Disability Insurance Scheme are set to dominate debate in the coming days.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lester Kiewit speaks to Professor Lyal White, faculty at Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) about Cuba’s approval of sweeping reforms to its socialist model amid US pressure; can Peru’s Keiko Fujimori settle in after rocking the boat in bid to presidency? Latin American teams strut their stuff at 2026 FIFA World Cup. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is a podcast of the CapeTalk breakfast show. This programme is your authentic Cape Town wake-up call. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is informative, enlightening and accessible. The team’s ability to spot & share relevant and unusual stories make the programme inclusive and thought-provoking. Don’t miss the popular World View feature at 7:45am daily. Listen out for #LesterInYourLounge which is an outside broadcast – from the home of a listener in a different part of Cape Town - on the first Wednesday of every month. This show introduces you to interesting Capetonians as well as their favourite communities, habits, local personalities and neighbourhood news. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays between 06:00 and 09:00 (SA Time) to Good Morning CapeTalk with Lester Kiewit broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/xGkqLbT or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/f9Eeb7i Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalkSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Adrian Wooldridge discusses how the 19th-century search for talent was shaped by utilitarianism and liberal reforms. Reformers like John Stuart Mill remained suspicious of the masses, seeking to replace the landed aristocracy with an "aristocracy of talent." This led to the development of psychometrics and standardized IQ testing, exemplified by the 11-plus examination in Britain, designed to allocate educational opportunities based on general mental ability. While intended to remove nepotism, the system faced early criticism for potentially favoring those from wealthy backgrounds who could purchase better education. 31680

Los Angeles and California have declared a state of emergency over the Boyle Heights warehouse fire. A measure that would allow the L.A. City Council to create policy for the police department is one of several charter reforms to appear on the November ballot. Previewing a zine festival in Long Beach that celebrates felines. Plus, more. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.com Support the show: https://laist.com

Defence spending is rising whether voters like it or not. The UK has committed to 2.5% of national income and aims for nearer 3.5% over the next decade, £30bn a year for each percentage point. What does the country get back? Can defence spending be pro-growth?In this week's VoxTalk, John Van Reenen (LSE) argues that getting a return on investment based on innovation need not be left to luck. For example nuclear power, GPS and the internet all began as military projects. The spillovers can be planned for; the trick is to make defence spending innovation-rich, and make procurement work better.Traditional top-down procurement mostly produces lock-in: the same firms winning over and over. Van Reenen's study of a project at the US Air Force shows the difference: when it asked firms what they could build, rather than telling them what to make, the competitions brought in startups, generated more original patents, and spilled ideas into the civilian economy. The research behind this episode:Moretti, Enrico, Claudia Steinwender, and John Van Reenen. 2025. "The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity, and International Spillovers." The Review of Economics and Statistics 107 (1). An ungated version is available as NBER Working Paper No. 26483.Howell, Sabrina T., Jason Rathje, John Van Reenen, and Jun Wong. 2025. "Opening Up Military Innovation: Causal Effects of Reforms to US Defense Research." Journal of Political Economy 133 (11). An ungated version is available as NBER Working Paper No. 28700.To cite this episode:Phillips, Tim, and John Van Reenen. 2026. “Making defence spending pay.” VoxTalks Economics (podcast).Assign this as extra listening. The citation above is formatted and ready for a reading list or VLE.About the guestJohn Van Reenen is the Ronald Coase School Professor at the London School of Economics and Director of the Programme on Innovation and Diffusion at the Centre for Economic Performance. He chairs the Council of Economic Advisors to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and is a Research Fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research and the NBER. His research spans innovation, productivity, industrial organisation, and the public policies that shape them.Research cited in this episodeCrowding in, not crowding out. Moretti, Steinwender and Van Reenen tracked industries across twenty-three economies over several decades and found that higher defence R&D spending raised private R&D rather than displacing it, with knock-on gains for productivity growth in the following decades.The SBIR Open Topics reform. The US Air Force Small Business Innovation Research programme traditionally ran "conventional" competitions specifying the technology wanted; from 2018 it added "open" competitions inviting firms to propose any idea useful to the Air Force. Howell, Rathje, Van Reenen and Wong compared near-winners with near-losers and found the open awards produced new military technology, more original patents, and civilian spillovers such as venture capital funding; the conventional awards mostly produced lock-in.Spin-offs from military research. Nuclear power, GPS and the internet each began as military projects before becoming civilian technologies; Van Reenen reaches back further to the claw of Archimedes, built to fend off the Roman fleet at Syracuse, as an early example of defence invention finding a wider use.The Draghi report. Van Reenen worked with Mario Draghi on his 2024 report on European competitiveness; he draws on it to argue that fragmented standards and duplicated procurement across Europe waste money, and that common standards and joint procurement would let countries specialise where they hold a comparative advantage.More VoxTalks Economics episodesIn January, Tim spoke to Moritz Schularick of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy about whether Europe can convert its industrial base into credible deterrence. Listen to Can Europe Defend Itself?

AM Best Senior Financial Analyst Lauren Magro highlights a new Best's Special Report that finds the Florida property insurance market has become increasingly manageable due to recent legislative reforms, along with a light weather year that drove substantial earnings in 2025.

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Day Break | Radicals, Reforms, and the Fight for America --- 00:00 - Monologue 19:15 – Ali Safavi, member of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Safavi discusses the upcoming June 20 rally in Paris, which supporters view as a significant moment for the Iranian opposition movement. He also analyzes President Trump's newly announced peace agreement with Iran, what it could mean for the Iranian regime, and the prospects for political change in the country. 28:09 – Marc Werner, CEO of GhostBed. Werner discusses the importance of quality sleep and how mattresses can affect recovery, pain management, overall wellness, and long-term health. He explains the role of cooling technology, pressure relief, and proper support in improving sleep quality, while also highlighting specialized mattress options for RV owners and travelers. 38:20 - Monologue 47:19 – Kris Ullman, President of Eagle Forum. Ullman discusses the importance of marriage, family stability, and what advocates call “Fidelity Month.” The conversation focuses on the role of commitment, strong family structures, and the nuclear family in promoting social and personal well-being. 57:35 – Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 26th United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. Kennedy discusses his Take Back Your Health Tour, the goals of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement, efforts to encourage healthier eating habits, and initiatives aimed at addressing chronic disease, obesity, and nutrition in the United States. 1:16:43 - Monologue 1:25:40 – Rep. Jay DeBoyer, Chair of the Michigan House Oversight Committee. DeBoyer discusses questions surrounding Michigan's Rx Kids program, including concerns raised by recent website changes and allegations regarding connections to guaranteed-income advocacy organizations. 1:35:41 – Secretary Scott Turner, 19th United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Turner discusses his recent travels across the country, the role of Opportunity Zones in economic development, and the administration's efforts to address housing affordability, expand homeownership opportunities, and strengthen local communities. --- Check out our brand new podcast, 'Forgotten America'... Episode 19 is live NOW at Steve Gruber on YouTube! Link below: https://youtu.be/rulxGa_tTeE

Episode Summary: In this episode, Mark Holthe and Alicia Backman-Beharry continue their series on major Express Entry reforms expected in Canada. They explain why the public consultation on minimum eligibility may not be the reform that most affects applicants, and break down the three tracks applicants need to watch: regulatory reform, CRS changes through ministerial instructions, and category-based draws. Key Topics Discussed Three-track timeline for Express Entry reforms CRS changes versus regulatory amendments Category-based draws and public consultation High-wage occupations and future job offer points Key Takeaways The eligibility merger is important, but it is not the most urgent reform for most applicants. CRS changes could arrive quickly through ministerial instructions and may significantly affect scores. Category-based draws are running on a separate clock and may become even more important as bonus points are removed. Applicants should prepare strategically by keeping as many pathways open as possible. Quotes from the Episode: Mark Holthe: “No longer can you just submit a profile, sit back, and wait for your turn.” Alicia Backman-Beharry: “It's really a matter of being really thoughtful about what you're doing, why you're doing it, and where you want it to take you.” Links and Resources Watch this episode on YouTube Canadian Immigration Podcast Book a consult Enroll in the Express Entry Accelerator and Masterclass Subscribe for MoreStay up-to-date with the latest in Canadian immigration by subscribing to the Canadian Immigration Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, or YouTube. Don't miss future episodes on policy changes, strategies, and practical advice for navigating Canada's immigration process. Disclaimer This episode provides general information about Canadian immigration and is not intended as legal advice. For personalized assistance, consult an immigration lawyer.

Capital gains tax carve outs confirmed, the PM also backs also down on a so-called "death tax".

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Capital gains tax carve outs confirmed, the PM also backs also down on a so-called "death tax".

Capital gains tax carve outs confirmed, the PM also backs also down on a so-called "death tax".

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Justice Department's explanation for Jeffrey Epstein's death rests on the claim that a sweeping systemic breakdown occurred inside the Metropolitan Correctional Center: guards failed to conduct required rounds, records were falsified, Epstein was left without a cellmate, staffing was inadequate, supervision failed, and surveillance systems were defective. Yet if those failures were truly broad enough to explain how one of the most consequential federal detainees in modern history died behind bars, they should have triggered an equally broad response. Instead, there was no unmistakable national overhaul of federal detention practices, no transparent accounting of responsibility up the chain of command, no comprehensive public proof that staffing, suicide-prevention, surveillance, and supervisory failures were permanently corrected, and few consequences proportional to the scale of the disaster...That absence of reform does not by itself prove Epstein was murdered, but it badly weakens the government's credibility. The DOJ cannot use chronic understaffing, ignored procedures, malfunctioning equipment, and falsified records to explain his death while allowing many of those same problems to persist years later. “Systemic breakdown” has become a convenient way to spread blame so widely that almost no one is held meaningfully responsible. The government acknowledged enough institutional failure to defend its conclusion, but not enough to force the institution to change. Until there is full transparency, measurable reform, and serious accountability, the official explanation will continue to look less like a resolved case and more like a demand that the public simply trust the same system that failed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A new progress report finds the Minneapolis Police Department is falling behind on court-enforced reforms. It's the fourth report over two years from the independent evaluator, Effective Law Enforcement for All. Minnesota Department of Human Rights Commissioner Rebecca Lucero helped create the court agreement and walked MPR News host through it.

The NLA should be a regulator, not a player in the industry. — Former NLA PRO, Goodfellow Dei Ofei, proposes a new framework.

Episode Summary: In this episode, Mark Holthe and Alicia Backman-Beharry continue their series on major Express Entry reforms expected in Canada. They break down the two-track timeline for Express Entry changes, what is expected to change quickly through ministerial instructions, what will take longer through regulatory amendments, and how applicants should assess their current strategy before the deeper reform episodes begin. Key Topics Discussed Two-track timeline for Express Entry reforms Ministerial instructions versus regulatory amendments What is staying stable in Express Entry for 2026 High-wage occupation factors and future CRS changes Key Takeaways Express Entry is evolving, not collapsing, and many core features remain stable for now. Ministerial instruction changes could happen quickly and may affect CRS scoring factors. Regulatory reforms, including a potential merger of FSW, CEC, and FST, are expected later. Applicants should assess whether their occupation, Canadian experience, education, spouse, French, PNP, or job offer strategy may be affected. Quotes from the Episode: Mark Holthe: “Change is here. It is right on the doorstep.” Alicia Backman-Beharry: “It's so helpful to understand which reforms are coming and when they're coming.” Links and Resources Watch this episode on YouTube Canadian Immigration Podcast Book a consult Enroll in the Express Entry Accelerator and Masterclass Subscribe for MoreStay up-to-date with the latest in Canadian immigration by subscribing to the Canadian Immigration Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, or YouTube. Don't miss future episodes on policy changes, strategies, and practical advice for navigating Canada's immigration process. Disclaimer This episode provides general information about Canadian immigration and is not intended as legal advice. For personalized assistance, consult an immigration lawyer.

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports Ukraine is due to officially begin European Union membership negotiations.

Musician Shayne Carter is perhaps most well known for Straitjacket Fits and Dimmer. Now the Music Hall of Fame inductee has collaborated with the New Zealand Symphony Orchestra on REforms - ten classic songs reformed with a full orchestra. They're performing the works as part of the Loemis Festival in Wellington this week.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Michael McFaul reflects on the collapse of the Soviet Union, recalling his time in Moscow in 1991 when he witnessed the transition from Gorbachev's reforms to Yeltsin's revolutionary phase. He argues that while the United States rightly supported Yeltsin, policymakers were too complacent, assuming democracy would consolidate organically without significant external investment. This "end of history" mentality led to a lack of political and economic support during Russia's vulnerable early years of independence. McFaul notes that failing to provide robust assistance to liberal reformers allowed for the eventual rise of Vladimir Putin. (3)1906

John talks with FBI Deputy Director Christopher Raia about the agency's unprecedented institutional transformation and efforts to modernize its operations to enhance efficiency and strengthen public safety. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Olena Halushka is a is a board member of the Ukrainian NGO “Anti-corruption Action Centre”, and co-founder of the International Centre for Ukrainian Victory. She has also worked as a chief of international advocacy at the post-Maidan coalition of 80 CSOs “Reanimation Package of Reforms”. Olena is a contributor to the Atlantic Council, Kyiv Independent. She has also written op-eds for the Washington Post, the Foreign Policy, and the EU Observer – but it's a major article she wrote for the UK's Guardian newspaper that we'll be discussing today.----------LINKS:https://twitter.com/OlenaHalushka https://twitter.com/AntAC_ua https://twitter.com/ICUVua https://www.linkedin.com/in/olena-halushka-b7342259/?originalSubdomain=ua https://ukrainianvictory.org/experts/olena-halushka/ https://www.fpri.org/contributor/olena-halushka/https://cepa.org/author/olena-halushka/https://archive.kyivpost.com/author/olena-halushkahttps://foreignpolicy.com/author/olena-halushka/----------SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:https://www.buymeacoffee.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.patreon.com/siliconcurtainhttps://www.gofundme.com/f/scaling-up-campaign-to-fight-authoritarian-disinformation----------TRUSTED CHARITIES ON THE GROUND:Car4Ukrainehttps://car4ukraine.com/en-US/campaignsDzyga's Pawhttps://dzygaspaw.com/projectsSuperhumans - Hospital for war traumashttps://superhumans.com/en/UNBROKEN - Treatment. Prosthesis. Rehabilitation for Ukrainians in Ukrainehttps://unbroken.org.ua/Come Back Alivehttps://savelife.in.ua/en/Chefs For Ukraine - World Central Kitchenhttps://wck.org/relief/activation-chefs-for-ukraineUNITED24 - An initiative of President Zelenskyyhttps://u24.gov.ua/Serhiy Prytula Charity Foundationhttps://prytulafoundation.orgNGO “Herojam Slava”https://heroiamslava.org/----------PLATFORMS:Substack: https://substack.com/@siliconcurtainTwitter: https://twitter.com/CurtainSiliconLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/finkjonathan/Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/4thRZj6NO7y93zG11JMtqm----------

Episode Summary: In this episode, Mark Holthe and Alicia Backman-Beharry continue their series on major Express Entry reforms expected in Canada. They examine IRCC's own data on Express Entry outcomes, why Canada is still proposing major reforms to a system that appears to be working, and how high wages, job offers, Canadian experience, French language ability, category-based draws, and immigration levels could reshape future permanent residence strategies. Key Topics Discussed IRCC data on Express Entry outcomes High-wage Canadian work experience and job offers Immigration levels and temporary resident reductions Why Express Entry reforms are being proposed Key Takeaways Express Entry applicants generally have strong employment, wage, and occupation-match outcomes. IRCC appears to be recalibrating the system toward high-wage earners and stronger economic predictors. Reduced temporary resident and permanent resident targets are making PR planning more competitive. Applicants should reassess CRS strategies that rely on bonus points, occupation categories, French, Canadian education, and timing. Quotes from the Episode: Mark Holthe: “Does my current CRS strategy, the factors I'm counting on, the timing I've planned, the profile I've built still make sense under a system being recalibrated toward high-wage earnings?” Alicia Backman-Beharry: “They are changing things not because they don't work, not because they're broken, but because they want to make it better.” Links and Resources Watch this episode on YouTube Canadian Immigration Podcast Book a consult Enroll in the Express Entry Accelerator and Masterclass Subscribe for MoreStay up-to-date with the latest in Canadian immigration by subscribing to the Canadian Immigration Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, or YouTube. Don't miss future episodes on policy changes, strategies, and practical advice for navigating Canada's immigration process. Disclaimer This episode provides general information about Canadian immigration and is not intended as legal advice. For personalized assistance, consult an immigration lawyer.

Listen to the Top News of 11/06/26 in Hindi.

Concerns raised about the impacts of NDIS reforms on Australians with psychosocial disability, JB HI-Fi to refund $250,000 to customers, after an investigation by the regulator, The AFL's Gather Round festival to stay in South Australia for another three years.

Joyce talks about the collapse of the Surfside Champlain Tower's and Florida's push for more safety reforms and oversight prevention. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Susan Pendergrass speaks with Cory Koedel, director of education policy at the Show-Me Institute, about Missouri education policy following the 2026 legislative session. They discuss the governor's A to F letter grade executive order, why literacy legislation failed to pass, leadership turmoil at DESE, new research on the effects of open enrollment, the case for expanding charter schools in Missouri, and more. Produced by Show-Me Opportunity

Listen to the Top News of 09/06/26 in Hindi.

Episode Summary: In this episode, Mark Holthe and Alicia Backman-Beharry launch a new series on major Express Entry reforms expected in Canada. They explain how Express Entry works, why it is not a permanent residence program itself, what applicants need to understand about the current system, and how upcoming changes to CRS points, category-based draws, and program structures could affect future permanent residence strategies. Key Topics Discussed Express Entry basics Federal Skilled Worker, Canadian Experience Class, and Federal Skilled Trades CRS score factors Upcoming Express Entry reforms Key Takeaways Express Entry is a system for managing economic immigration applications, not a program itself. Being in the Express Entry pool does not guarantee an invitation to apply. Canadian Experience Class and category-based draws are currently playing a major role. Upcoming reforms could significantly change how CRS points are awarded. Quotes from the Episode: Mark Holthe: “There's nothing more important than knowing what's coming and then doing what you can to increase your chances of success.” Alicia Backman-Beharry: “What people do right now is going to impact whether their profile is one that has a chance in the future.” Links and Resources Watch this episode on YouTube Canadian Immigration Podcast Book a consult Enroll in the Express Entry Accelerator and Masterclass Subscribe for MoreStay up-to-date with the latest in Canadian immigration by subscribing to the Canadian Immigration Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, or YouTube. Don't miss future episodes on policy changes, strategies, and practical advice for navigating Canada's immigration process. Disclaimer This episode provides general information about Canadian immigration and is not intended as legal advice. For personalized assistance, consult an immigration lawyer.

The Waitangi Tribunal has been holding a hearing for its inquiry into the government's proposed amendments to treaty clauses. It launched the urgent inquiry last month because of concerns the reforms could cause and I quote, "significant and irreversible prejudice" to Maori. When the amendments were announced, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said they would ensure references to the principles of the treaty are clear and consistent. We wanted to know exactly what is being looked at and why, so to help explain it is RNZ Maori News Journalist Pokere Paewai.

DOJ sues Colorado over its magazine ban. Virginia passes “assault firearm” and magazine restrictions, triggering immediate lawsuits. Traditional Arms: Fuddbusters and Ratman Fifth Circuit judges signal unease with the federal machine-gun ban. ATF / DOJ regulatory rollback and “New Era of Reform.” MAF Corp: Fudbdusterss California AB 2047: 3D-printer firearm-file blocking technology Illinois HB 4471 […]

DOJ sues Colorado over its magazine ban. Virginia passes “assault firearm” and magazine restrictions, triggering immediate lawsuits. Traditional Arms: Fuddbusters and Ratman Fifth Circuit judges signal unease with the federal machine-gun ban. ATF / DOJ regulatory rollback and “New Era of Reform.” MAF Corp: Fudbdusterss California AB 2047: 3D-printer firearm-file blocking technology Illinois HB 4471 / “convertible pistol” bill FFL Payments Sig Sauer P320 litigation update: Second Circuit revives Colwell suit, while Sig touts another dismissal The Associated Press Pearl Clutches over Muskets Patriot patch Co. TWIG10

Guest Phil Kerpen, American Commitment, joins to discuss what could be in the upcoming reconciliation bills in DC. Discussion of completely opening DHS, spending cuts, healthcare reforms, and preparing for the midterm election season. Could we see a repealing of Obamacare, and Republicans actually try to tackle the healthcare crisis? Nationwide settlements have hit more than $1.5M in lawsuits from people suing after losing their job over social media comments celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk. Do we even know what the 1st Amendment is about? Discussion of pride for country, and the de-humanizing of political opponents. 

The Federal Government is hopeful of avoiding a lengthy Senate inquiry on its proposed tax reforms and is in talks with the Greens, trying to convince them to back the changes and pass it quickly.

The Federal Government is hopeful of avoiding a lengthy Senate inquiry on its proposed tax reforms and is in talks with the Greens, trying to convince them to back the changes and pass it quickly.

(8) Judy Dempsey discusses the AfD party's rise in Germany, which exploits voter fear regarding globalization and deindustrialization. However, the populists lack pragmatic solutions for demographic challenges and the necessary economic reforms missed by previous leaders.

The first reform to sports gambling in Colorado was signed into law on Monday. It addresses growing concerns about addiction and financial ruin. CPR investigative reporter Ben Markus has covered sports betting since before it was even legal, and spoke about the changes with Ryan Warner. Then, it's a dream come true for Greek and Indigenous artist Anna Tsouhlarakis whose work is now featured in the Whitney Biennial. And, what stress levels in a tiny pika can tell us about a changing climate. 

June 2, 2026- Assemblymember Jen Lunsford, a Rochester-area Democrat, discusses language in the state budget - championed by Gov. Kathy Hochul - that is supposed to bring down car insurance costs.

Preview for Later Today: Cliff May discusses CIA Director John Ratcliffe's mission to Cuba, offering financial relief for their broken economy. The U.S. demands aid bypass the government and requires fundamental human rights reforms before providing any total bailout.1960

Drawing on his time in Moscow during the early 1990s, Michael McFaul describes the revolutionary transition from Gorbachev's reforms to the radicalism of the Yeltsin era. He highlights the unprecedented uncertainty of the Soviet collapse and the subsequent failure of the West to invest in Russia's democratic consolidation. McFaul notes that the 1992 U.S. election's focus on domestic issues distracted from providing critical political and economic assistance. Unlike the post-WWII era, the lack of a perceived external threat led to complacency about the "end of history." He stresses that supporting institutional demand for democracy is vital for long-term stability. (3/8)1900 BRUSSELS 

Evan Ellis characterizes protests in Bolivia as an organized "coup in motion" funded by coca growers' unions. Figures like Evo Morales and rivals within the government benefit from dismantling reforms. The instability threatens counter-drug efforts and allows criminal organizations to flourish while the government struggles to maintain order amidst resource blockades. (6/16)1900