POPULARITY
Canadian Brewers are coming together to compete to be recognized as the best in Canada. Rick Dalmazzi, the Executive Director of the Canadian Craft Brewer's Association joins us to explain some behind the scenes work of the CCBA, and the newly created Canada Beer Cup.
Interview with Rick Dalmazzi, executive director of the Canadian Craft Brewers Association, during the Ontario Craft Brewers Conference & Suppliers Marketplace 2019. The Canadian Craft Brewers Association represents the interests of over 1,000 craft breweries and brewpubs in every province and territory in Canada. ccba-ambc.org
A Fifth Circuit extravaganza featuring Jane Webre, Kyle Hawkins, Steve Vladeck, and Evan Young. The episode was recorded before a LIVE student audience at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin at the invitation of the UT chapter of the Federalist Society. Use iTunes? https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/short-circuit/id309062019 Use Android (RSS)? http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:84493247/sounds.rss Newsletter: http://ij.org/about-us/shortcircuit/ Want to email us? shortcircuit@ij.org Jane Webre is a partner at Scott Douglass and McConnico. She handles most of the firm’s appeals, including in the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. Jane prevailed as counsel for petitioners in Gunn v. Minton, a SCOTUS case involving jurisdiction of state courts. She clerked for Judge Reynaldo Garza on the Fifth Circuit, a Jimmy Carter appointee. Jane is a UT Law grad. Kyle Hawkins is the current solicitor general of Texas. Prior to this appointment, he served as an assistant to solicitor general Scott Keller. He clerked for the Fifth Circuit’s Edith Jones and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Samuel Alito. A graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School, Hawkins also worked in the appellate and constitutional law practice group for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Steve Vladeck is a law professor at UT Law. Just last term, he argued Dalmazzi v. U.S. in the United States Supreme Court. His teaching and research focus on federal jurisdiction, constitutional law, national security law, and military justice. Steve graduated from Yale Law School and clerked for Judge Marsha Berzon on the Ninth Circuit and Judge Rosemary Barkett on the Eleventh Circuit. Evan Young is a Federal Courts professor at UT Law. He is also a partner at Baker Botts and its chair of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Law practice. Evan graduated from Yale Law School and served as a law clerk to Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and then to Justice Antonin Scalia at the U.S. Supreme Court. Hernandez v. Mesa: http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Hernandez-op-below.pdf Whole Women’s Health: http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/18/18-50484-CV0.pdf Alvarez v. City of Brownsville: http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/16/16-40772-CR2.pdf
Steve Vladeck rejoins us on ... lots of things. Christian returns from a conference abroad, french fries, standing, Iceland, patents and trial by battle, Trump, pronunciation in the Supreme Court and in various American cities, thunder. And then, (at 26:41 if you want to skip to the more serious part) a Dalmazzi update and general speculation about the authorship of pending cases and what's going on in the building. Will the big cases this term - travel ban, redistricting - fizzle like Masterpiece? Are there lessons or opportunities for reform of the Court's jurisdiction, procedures, and politics (46:21)? Then we discuss the new DOJ guidance on asylum, released while we were recording, and the immigration and general political crisis we now face (1:10:42). This show’s links: Steve Vladeck’s faculty profile (https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck) and academic writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=362455) The National Security Law Podcast (https://www.nationalsecuritylawpodcast.com/) Special Guest: Steve Vladeck.
This week's episode covers judges, and more specifically judicial mistakes currently before the Supreme Court. Brett and Nazim discuss Rosales-Mireles v. U.S, which basically covers how the Court should approach math problems, and Dalmazzi v. U.S., which discusses the current applicability of Civil War military appointment statutes. Law starts at (04:30).
Steve Vladeck rejoins us on the law of civilian-military separation, whether Marbury v. Madison was rightly decided, and how his recent oral argument before the Supreme Court went (spoiler: amazingly but weirdly). (Ignore Christian's use of the term "basises" (wtf?) and other misstatements and inanities ... you try recording ever week between classes....) This show’s links: Steve Vladeck’s faculty profile (https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck) and academic writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=362455) The National Security Law Podcast 54: Family Ties or Family Matters? (https://www.nationalsecuritylawpodcast.com/ep-54-family-ties-or-family-matters/) First Mondays OT2017 #12: False Idol (http://www.firstmondays.fm/episodes/2018/1/22/ot2017-12-false-idol) (guest Steve Vladeck) SCOTUSblog page for Dalmazzi v. United States (http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dalmazzi-v-united-states/) (including links to all the briefs and more) The oral argument: Oyez version (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/16-961), SCOTUS downloads (https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2017/16-961), and transcript (https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-961_08l1.pdf) Oral Argument 137: Steve Vladeck Pincer Move (http://oralargument.org/137) (where we discussed Dalmazzi at the cert stage) Burns v. Wilson (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13501152442303513103) Marbury v. Madison (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9834052745083343188) William Baude, Exciting Developments in Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: Some Would Call It the Second Coming of Marbury v. Madison (http://reason.com/volokh/2018/01/08/exciting-developments-in-supreme-court-a) United States v. Coe (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18289973798213960260) ex parte Bollman and Swartwout (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=891096754227370578) Akhil Amar, Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2019&context=fss_papers) Louise Weinberg, Our Marbury (https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/uploads/publication_files/ourmarburypub.pdf) Felker v. Turpin (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11980829158634315619); see also Oral Argument 84: Felker's Chickens (http://oralargument.org/84) United States v. Gray (http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/newcaaf/opinions/2017OctTerm/170525.pdf) Special Guest: Steve Vladeck.
Lawfare contributor and University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck argued before the Supreme Court last week in United States v. Dalmazzi, a case concerning the appointment of military judges to the Court of Military Commission Review and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Vladeck joined Scott Anderson on the Lawfare Podcast to discuss the complexities of the case, why it matters and what it’s like arguing before the nine justices.
Dalmazzi v. United States | 01/16/18 | Docket #: 16-961
Holiday nonsense show part 2: on the upcoming Supreme Court arguments Dalmazzi v. United States, millennials and the punishing U.S. economic system, the presidency and the popular vote, and expertise and Twitter. This show’s links: SCOTUSblog page for Dalmazzi v. United States (http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dalmazzi-v-united-states/) In That Case podcast (https://inthatcasepodcast.com) Michael Hobbes, FML: Why Millennials Are Facing the Scariest Financial Future of Any Generation Since the Great Depression (http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/poor-millennials/) Carissa Byrne Hessick, Towards a Series of Academic Norms for #Lawprof Twitter (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3095014) Oral Argument 89: Adequacy (http://oralargument.org/89) (guest Josh Weishart) Oral Argument 42: Shotgun Aphasia (http://oralargument.org/42) (guest Orin Kerr) How to Block Accounts on Twitter (https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/blocking-and-unblocking-accounts)
Where federal courts, national security, and subtle but important problems lurk, you’ll find Steve Vladeck explaining things. Steve joins us to talk about a seemingly narrow question of the proper application a statute prohibiting civil-office holding by military officers. The issue, though, could hardly be more far-reaching, asking us to consider the principles of civilian control of the military and military non-control of civil life. Also, a little on the use of “treason” to describe the allegations of the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russian operatives and Flynn’s work for Turkey. This show’s links: Steve Vladeck’s faculty profile (https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck), academic writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=362455), and blogging on Lawfare (https://lawfareblog.com/contributors/svladeck) The National Security Law Podcast (https://www.nationalsecuritylawpodcast.com) and in particular episode 21: A Military Commissions Deep Dive (https://www.nationalsecuritylawpodcast.com/episode-21-a-military-commissions-deep-dive/) Steve Vladeck, An Unconventional Test Case for Civilian Control of the Military (https://lawfareblog.com/unconventional-test-case-civilian-control-military) SCOTUSblog page for Dalmazzi v. United States (http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dalmazzi-v-united-states/) (containing links to the opinion below and all briefing) Edmond v. United States (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=378350361225082100) In re Al-Nashiri (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1182013408965603282) Steve Vladeck, The Misbegotten Court of Military Commission Review (https://www.lawfareblog.com/misbegotten-court-military-commission-review) Christian Turner, Submarine Statutes (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2913641) William Eskridge and John Ferejohn, Super-Statutes (http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol50/iss5/3/) Kathleen McInnis, Statutory Restrictions on the Position of Secretary of Defense: Issues for Congress (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R44725.pdf) (an excellent and highly readable Congressional Research Service report on civilian control of the military and civil-military relations) Steve Vladeck, [Calling it] Treason Doth Never Prosper… (https://www.justsecurity.org/39204/calling-it-treason-doth-prosper/) Diane Mazur, A More Perfect Military (https://www.amazon.com/More-Perfect-Military-Constitution-Stronger/dp/0195394488) Special Guest: Steve Vladeck.