Podcasts about Judge

Donate (no account necessary) | Subscribe (account required) A landmark legal ruling closes the week as a Wisconsin judge is found guilty of obstructing federal immigration agents, becoming the first state judge convicted for blocking an ICE arrest. Meanwhile, the man behind the Brown University shooting is identified after killing himself during a police standoff, with authorities confirming he was also responsible for the murder of an MIT professor. The case raises new questions about migrant crime, visa pathways, and possible foreign intelligence angles tied to nuclear research. The White House signals a tougher stance on immigration enforcement, moving to sharply increase denaturalization cases while warning that current citizenship laws are being exploited. President Trump also advances plans to reclassify marijuana to encourage research, finalizes a deal forcing TikTok's Chinese owner to sell most of its US stake, and prepares to decide whether Chinese drone maker DJI poses a national security threat. Abroad, Venezuela deploys naval escorts to protect oil shipments amid a US blockade, raising the risk of direct confrontation. Trump's Gaza peace plan stalls as Israel continues targeting Hamas leaders, even as another US-backed peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan quietly holds. The episode closes with Bryan previewing a special unscripted, listener-driven series for Christmas week.    "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32     Keywords: Wisconsin judge guilty obstruction ICE, Brown University shooter identified, MIT professor killing, migrant crime visas, denaturalization push, marijuana reclassification, TikTok ByteDance sale, DJI national security review, Venezuela oil blockade, Gaza peace plan, Armenia Azerbaijan agreement, Wright Report listener Q&A

Silicon Bites Ep275 | 2025-12-18 | Trump shits on everything and everyone when they cease to be useful to him. We will go back to his first chaotic administration to understand the patterns and see what he's learned in his second to avoid dirty laundry in public and the revolving door of sacked and disgraced aids, supporters and sycophants. We'll also ask, what are the implications for Ukraine, and the Trump security guarantees, as well as for Venezuela and an incipient war, based on a repeated pattern of behaviour in Trump that seeks to avoid all accountability, responsibility or blowback from his mistakes, actions and inactions, and clear venality that is happening in plain sight. There's a particular kind of political nihilism that doesn't merely break norms — it gobbles them up and splits the bones out in your face. It doesn't build coalitions or alliances; it burns them in a test of fealty and subservience. That demands conformity, obeyance and obsequiousness. It doesn't govern, but dominates through humiliation, coercion and bribery, and cycles through people, institutions, and alliances like disposable diapers.----------Silicon Curtain is a part of the Christmas Tree Trucks 2025 campaign - an ambitious fundraiser led by a group of our wonderful team of information warriors raising 110,000 EUR for the Ukrainian army. https://car4ukraine.com/campaigns/christmas-tree-trucks-2025-silicon-curtainThe Goal of the Campaign for the Silicon Curtain community:- 1 armoured battle-ready pickupWe are sourcing all vehicles around 2010-2017 or newer, mainly Toyota Hilux or Mitsubishi L200, with low mileage and fully serviced. These are some of the greatest and the most reliable pickups possible to be on the frontline in Ukraine. Who will receive the vehicles?https://car4ukraine.com/campaigns/christmas-tree-trucks-2025-silicon-curtain- The 38th Marine Brigade, who alone held Krynki for 124 days, receiving the Military Cross of Honour.- The 1027th Anti-aircraft and artillery regiment. Honoured by NATO as Defender of the Year 2024 and recipient of the Military Cross of Honour.- 104th Separate Brigade, Infantry, who alone held Kherson for 100 days, establishing conditions for the liberation of the city.- 93rd Brigade "Kholodnyi Yar", Black Raven Unmanned Systems Battalion ----------SOURCES:Brookings – Tracking turnover in the Trump administrationhttps://www.brookings.edu/articles/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration/Reuters (Dec 16, 2025) – Trump sues the BBC for $10 billion over speech edithttps://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trump-sues-bbc-defamation-over-editing-january-6-speech-2025-12-16/AP (Dec 16, 2025) – Trump sues BBC for defamation over editinghttps://apnews.com/article/a9fd196c4f242decd8f28e8d0ce74442Reuters (Dec 16, 2025) – UK PM Starmer's office response to Trump BBC lawsuithttps://www.reuters.com/world/uk-pm-starmers-office-trump-legal-action-is-matter-bbc-2025-12-16/CPJ (Dec 2025) – CPJ statement on Trump BBC lawsuit and press freedomhttps://cpj.org/2025/12/cpj-trumps-bbc-lawsuit-is-yet-another-attack-on-us-media-freedom/PEN America (Dec 16, 2025) – Statement on Trump exporting anti-press tactics via BBC lawsuithttps://pen.org/press-release/trump-exports-anti-press-tactics-abroad/Reuters (Dec 17, 2025) – Judge allows Trump's ballroom project to proceed for nowhttps://www.reuters.com/world/judge-allows-trumps-ballroom-project-proceed-now-2025-12-17/Reuters (Dec 16–17, 2025) – Judge unlikely to immediately halt Trump White House ballroom projecthttps://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trumps-300-million-white-house-ballroom-makeover-faces-day-court-2025-12-16/Reuters (Apr 24, 2025) – 100 days of DOGE: lots of chaos, not so much efficiencyhttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/100-days-doge-lots-chaos-not-so-much-efficiency-2025-04-24/----------

Madison's only Ethiopian restaurant announced this week that it may soon close. Buraka, a Madison staple for more than 30 years, is struggling to attract customers and the owner in talks about ending the Willy Street lease. Host Bianca Martin chats with executive producer Hayley Sperling and producer Jade Iseri-Ramos about the hazy future on the Friday news roundup. Plus, we discuss the federal trial of Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, and the fate of the Coliseum at Alliant Energy Center. Plus, guess which lakes are frozen?  Mentioned on the show: Southside residents want input on southside projects [Cap Times] Madison outdoor ice rinks are opening [City of Madison]

Judge Milton Mack shares his mission to reform the mental health system by moving from crisis intervention to early treatment and prevention. His groundbreaking work in Michigan demonstrates how changing laws and procedures can dramatically improve outcomes while reducing costs. • Moving from an inpatient model to an outpatient world where over 90% of mental health care now occurs • Changing intervention standards to help people before they reach crisis, not waiting for the "magic moment" of danger • Implementing mediation for mental health cases to increase engagement and compliance • Creating a system that reduces trauma by avoiding unnecessary hospitalization and incarceration • Demonstrating success through Genesee County's 70% reduction in hospitalization and 90% treatment compliance • Building coordinated stakeholder systems where law enforcement, hospitals, courts and treatment providers work together • Focusing on upstream solutions to prevent people from entering the criminal justice system • Recognizing that early intervention in mental health is as important as early intervention for cancer We need to intervene early—we wouldn't wait to treat someone with cancer when they're stage four, and we do just as much damage by waiting to treat mental illness. Assisted outpatient treatment is the most humane option, far better than hospitalization, jail, or homelessness. This approach benefits everyone. https://tonymantor.com https://Facebook.com/tonymantor https://instagram.com/tonymantor https://twitter.com/tonymantor https://youtube.com/tonymantormusic intro/outro music bed written by T. Wild Why Not Me  music published by Mantor Music (BMI) The content on Why Not Me: Embracing Autism amd Mental Health Worldwide, including discussions on mental health, autism, and related topics, is provided for informational and entertainment purposes only. The views and opinions expressed by guests are their own and do not reflect those of the podcast, its hosts, or affiliates.Why Not Me is not a medical or mental health professional and does not endorse or verify the accuracy, efficacy, safety of any treatments, programs, or advice discussed.Listeners should consult qualified healthcare professionals, such as licensed therapists, psychologists, or physicians, before making decisions about mental health or autism- related care.Reliance on this podcast's contents is at the listener's own risk. Why Not Me is not liable for any outcomes, financial or otherwise, resulting from actions taken based on the information provided. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

A Kentucky sheriff shot and killed a judge inside his own courthouse chambers — and according to court documents, the warning signs were everywhere. Witnesses say Mickey Stines hadn't slept in days. He'd lost a massive amount of weight. He was convinced unnamed people were going to kill his wife and daughter. He woke his wife up at night to whisper because he believed their home was bugged. And on the day of the shooting, he reportedly tried calling his grandmother — who had been dead for three years. Coworkers saw it. An attorney saw it.  The local police chief said "that son of a bitch has lost his mind." His friends even took him to the doctor the day before. And still, nobody stopped what was coming. In this segment, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott breaks down what these behaviors actually mean clinically — what paranoid psychosis looks like, why people miss or dismiss the warning signs, and what Stines' insanity defense might actually hold up to. We're not here to excuse what happened. We're here to understand it. Because this case is a brutal lesson in what happens when someone falls apart in plain sight and no one knows what to do about it. #MickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #TrueCrime #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #MentalHealthCrisis #InsanityDefense #WarningSigns #Psychosis #ShavaunScott Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Mickey Stines just admitted in court filings that he shot and killed Judge Kevin Mullins. Nine bullets. Seven of them fired while the judge was already on the ground. It's all on video. But now Stines is claiming he "had no control" over his actions—and his defense is pointing to a rare neurological disease caused by bug bites as part of the explanation. For over a year, no one could explain why a Kentucky sheriff walked into a judge's chambers and executed a man he'd worked with for decades. They'd eaten lunch together that same day. Stines used to be Mullins' bailiff. And then, after a seven-minute private conversation, Stines locked the door and opened fire. Now court documents reveal what was happening to Stines in the days before the shooting. He'd lost 40 pounds in two weeks. He was making phone calls to dead relatives. He told staff that shadowy forces were coming to kill his wife and daughter. He made someone put a bulletproof vest on his wife. His own employees believed he was in a psychosis. An attorney warned the judge directly that Stines was "losing it." The local police chief said he'd "lost his mind." But here's the problem: the day before the shooting, Stines saw a doctor. And according to medical records, he denied experiencing any psychosis or homicidal thoughts. The doctor diagnosed "acute stress reaction" and sent him home. Twenty-four hours later, Kevin Mullins was dead. Now Stines is building an insanity defense that includes claims of California encephalitis—a tick-borne illness that can cause confusion and aggression. Whether that's a legitimate diagnosis or a legal strategy remains to be seen. What's clear is that this case is about to get a lot more complicated. #MickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #Letcher County #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #CaliforniaEncephalitis #TrueCrime2025 #JusticeForMullins Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Three days before Sheriff Mickey Stines allegedly walked into Judge Kevin Mullins' chambers and shot him nine times, an attorney contacted the Kentucky Bar Association asking what he could do to intervene. He'd already warned Mullins directly. Told him Stines was "losing it." The local police chief had seen enough to say Stines had "lost his mind." Staff inside the sheriff's office watched their boss make phone calls to relatives who had been dead for years. They got him to a doctor. The doctor sent him home with a diagnosis of "acute stress reaction." Twenty-four hours later, Kevin Mullins was dead. This isn't a story about people who didn't care. It's a story about people who saw a crisis developing, took action within the limits of what they could actually do, and discovered those limits weren't anywhere close to enough. Kentucky has no red flag law. Involuntary commitment requires proof of imminent danger — not paranoid delusions, not rapid weight loss, not bizarre behavior. And when the person in crisis is an elected sheriff, nobody has the authority to suspend him, disarm him, or override his denials. Court documents exposed this week reveal just how many people recognized something catastrophic was happening — and how the systems we've built gave them almost no power to stop it. The widow's civil lawsuit now asks whether three sheriff's office employees should be held liable for failing to warn Judge Mullins. Their defense: Kentucky law imposed no duty to warn or protect. Everyone did something. It wasn't enough. And the gap between "someone should do something" and anyone having the power to actually do it is where Kevin Mullins died. #MickeyStines #JudgeMullins #TrueCrime #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #MentalHealthCrisis #RedFlagLaws #TrueCrimeNews #SystemicFailure Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

A Kentucky sheriff shot and killed a judge inside his own courthouse chambers — and according to court documents, the warning signs were everywhere. Witnesses say Mickey Stines hadn't slept in days. He'd lost a massive amount of weight. He was convinced unnamed people were going to kill his wife and daughter. He woke his wife up at night to whisper because he believed their home was bugged. And on the day of the shooting, he reportedly tried calling his grandmother — who had been dead for three years. Coworkers saw it. An attorney saw it.  The local police chief said "that son of a bitch has lost his mind." His friends even took him to the doctor the day before. And still, nobody stopped what was coming. In this segment, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott breaks down what these behaviors actually mean clinically — what paranoid psychosis looks like, why people miss or dismiss the warning signs, and what Stines' insanity defense might actually hold up to. We're not here to excuse what happened. We're here to understand it. Because this case is a brutal lesson in what happens when someone falls apart in plain sight and no one knows what to do about it. #MickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #TrueCrime #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #MentalHealthCrisis #InsanityDefense #WarningSigns #Psychosis #ShavaunScott Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Mickey Stines just admitted in court filings that he shot and killed Judge Kevin Mullins. Nine bullets. Seven of them fired while the judge was already on the ground. It's all on video. But now Stines is claiming he "had no control" over his actions—and his defense is pointing to a rare neurological disease caused by bug bites as part of the explanation. For over a year, no one could explain why a Kentucky sheriff walked into a judge's chambers and executed a man he'd worked with for decades. They'd eaten lunch together that same day. Stines used to be Mullins' bailiff. And then, after a seven-minute private conversation, Stines locked the door and opened fire. Now court documents reveal what was happening to Stines in the days before the shooting. He'd lost 40 pounds in two weeks. He was making phone calls to dead relatives. He told staff that shadowy forces were coming to kill his wife and daughter. He made someone put a bulletproof vest on his wife. His own employees believed he was in a psychosis. An attorney warned the judge directly that Stines was "losing it." The local police chief said he'd "lost his mind." But here's the problem: the day before the shooting, Stines saw a doctor. And according to medical records, he denied experiencing any psychosis or homicidal thoughts. The doctor diagnosed "acute stress reaction" and sent him home. Twenty-four hours later, Kevin Mullins was dead. Now Stines is building an insanity defense that includes claims of California encephalitis—a tick-borne illness that can cause confusion and aggression. Whether that's a legitimate diagnosis or a legal strategy remains to be seen. What's clear is that this case is about to get a lot more complicated. #MickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #Letcher County #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #CaliforniaEncephalitis #TrueCrime2025 #JusticeForMullins Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Three days before Sheriff Mickey Stines allegedly walked into Judge Kevin Mullins' chambers and shot him nine times, an attorney contacted the Kentucky Bar Association asking what he could do to intervene. He'd already warned Mullins directly. Told him Stines was "losing it." The local police chief had seen enough to say Stines had "lost his mind." Staff inside the sheriff's office watched their boss make phone calls to relatives who had been dead for years. They got him to a doctor. The doctor sent him home with a diagnosis of "acute stress reaction." Twenty-four hours later, Kevin Mullins was dead. This isn't a story about people who didn't care. It's a story about people who saw a crisis developing, took action within the limits of what they could actually do, and discovered those limits weren't anywhere close to enough. Kentucky has no red flag law. Involuntary commitment requires proof of imminent danger — not paranoid delusions, not rapid weight loss, not bizarre behavior. And when the person in crisis is an elected sheriff, nobody has the authority to suspend him, disarm him, or override his denials. Court documents exposed this week reveal just how many people recognized something catastrophic was happening — and how the systems we've built gave them almost no power to stop it. The widow's civil lawsuit now asks whether three sheriff's office employees should be held liable for failing to warn Judge Mullins. Their defense: Kentucky law imposed no duty to warn or protect. Everyone did something. It wasn't enough. And the gap between "someone should do something" and anyone having the power to actually do it is where Kevin Mullins died. #MickeyStines #JudgeMullins #TrueCrime #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #MentalHealthCrisis #RedFlagLaws #TrueCrimeNews #SystemicFailure Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This episode is presented by Create A Video – The trial of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan has not gone well... AT ALL... as witness after witness outlined how she lied to colleagues, staff, and immigration officers in an attempt to help a criminal illegal alien escape through a back door in her courtroom. Plus, NASCAR legend Greg Biffle died today in a plane crash in Statesville. Subscribe to the podcast at: https://ThePetePod.com/ All the links to Pete's Prep are free: https://patreon.com/petekalinershow Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code! Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com Get exclusive content here!: https://thepetekalinershow.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf

A Kentucky sheriff shot and killed a judge inside his own courthouse chambers — and according to court documents, the warning signs were everywhere. Witnesses say Mickey Stines hadn't slept in days. He'd lost a massive amount of weight. He was convinced unnamed people were going to kill his wife and daughter. He woke his wife up at night to whisper because he believed their home was bugged. And on the day of the shooting, he reportedly tried calling his grandmother — who had been dead for three years. Coworkers saw it. An attorney saw it.  The local police chief said "that son of a bitch has lost his mind." His friends even took him to the doctor the day before. And still, nobody stopped what was coming. In this segment, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott breaks down what these behaviors actually mean clinically — what paranoid psychosis looks like, why people miss or dismiss the warning signs, and what Stines' insanity defense might actually hold up to. We're not here to excuse what happened. We're here to understand it. Because this case is a brutal lesson in what happens when someone falls apart in plain sight and no one knows what to do about it. #MickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #TrueCrime #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #MentalHealthCrisis #InsanityDefense #WarningSigns #Psychosis #ShavaunScott Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Reiner family has issued a statement, the first since the death of Rob and Michelle Reiner Sunday. A judge ruled in favor of Congressmembers making unannounced visits to immigration detention centers. We tell you about a very zany rendition of the Christmas classic, Die Hard. Plus, more from Evening Edition. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.comThis LAist podcast is supported by Amazon Autos. Buying a car used to be a whole day affair. Now, at Amazon Autos, you can shop for a new, used, or certified pre-owned car whenever, wherever. You can browse hundreds of vehicles from top local dealers, all in one place. Amazon.com/autosVisit www.preppi.com/LAist to receive a FREE Preppi Emergency Kit (with any purchase over $100) and be prepared for the next wildfire, earthquake or emergency! Support the show: https://laist.com

In this behind-the-scenes episode of the Fleet Success Show, Josh Turley sits down with long-time NAFA 100 Best Fleets judge Scott Rood to reveal what really goes into scoring top public fleets across the country.With over six years of judging experience, Scott unpacks the nuances of what separates a winning application from a forgettable one. From incomplete data and wordy essays to fleets getting creative with technician shortages, this episode is a goldmine for any fleet manager looking to stand out in the competition—or simply improve their operation.If you're serious about benchmarking your fleet, increasing asset availability, retaining technicians, and proving your team's value to stakeholders, this conversation is a must-listen. It's full of hard truths, hilarious judging stories, and actionable advice that will make your next NAFA application stronger—and your fleet operation smarter.  ✅ Key Takeaways:The #1 Mistake applicants make when filling out their NAFA 100 Best application (and how to avoid it)Why data transparency—not just storytelling—is essential for scoring highThe importance of application reviews and how they directly impact next year's rankingWhy recruiting from trade schools is becoming a smart strategy for solving the tech shortageA behind-the-scenes look at how judges standardize scoring across 200+ applicationsWhat judges are really looking for when evaluating KPIs like fleet availability and comeback rates 

Most believers are waiting for the Lamb of God—but what if I told you the world is about to meet Jesus the Judge? The church is soft-pedaling the truth, but the Bible is clear—Jesus is coming back not just as the Savior, but as the righteous Judge of nations. And here's the real kicker: whether you encounter Him as the Lamb or the Judge depends on where you stand right now. This is the revelation most churches aren't preaching, and I'm going to break it all down.   Podcast Episode 1970: Will the World Encounter Jesus the Judge or Jesus the Lamb? The Answer may Surprise You! | don't miss this! Listen to more episodes of the Lance Wallnau Show at lancewallnau.com/podcast

Snack credits are either the best little “vacation cheat code” Disney ever slipped into the Dining Plan - or a spreadsheet-powered trap that turns your family trip into a competitive sport. This week in the Court of the Disney World Resort, Len Testa and Chris Cox argue whether snack credits are a smart way to stretch your Walt Disney World dollars, or just a confusing system that rewards the deeply committed and mildly deranged. Along the way, there is Starbucks math, Epcot festival strategy, and at least one Easy-Bake oven-related conflict of interest. HIGHLIGHTS • Why snack credits can be a secret weapon at EPCOT festivals - especially when you know which items creep up toward that $10 “sweet spot.” • The maddening part of the Dining Plan - there is no consistent rule for what counts as a snack, so you're stuck hunting for the logo like it's a scavenger hunt. • The “snack credit endgame” - realizing on your last day you have a pile of credits left, and suddenly you're importing Rice Krispies treats through customs. • Using snack credits for “breakfast” (because apparently cheesecake counts as dairy and eggs) and other vacation logic that only makes sense inside the Disney bubble. • The philosophical divide - gaming the system for maximum value vs. enjoying the feeling that “past you paid for this,” so present you can just say yes and keep moving. For this episode's full show notes, click here. HOSTS • Jim Hill - IG: @JimHillMedia | X: @JimHillMedia | Website: JimHillMedia.com • Len Testa - IG: @len.testa | Website: TouringPlans.com • Chris Cox - IG: @magiccox | X: @bigcox | Website: magiccox.com FOLLOW • Facebook: JimHillMediaNews • Instagram: JimHillMedia • TikTok: JimHillMedia SUPPORT Support the show and access bonus episodes and additional content at Patreon.com/JimHillMedia. PRODUCTION CREDITS Edited by Dave Grey Produced by Eric Hersey - Strong Minded Agency If you would like to sponsor a show on the Jim Hill Media Podcast Network, reach out today. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's guest won't surprise you if you read the introduction to Rich Girl Nation, which recollected the 2018 event that made me think personal finance might not be solely for people with brown bananas and pocket protectors. Lindsey Stanberry, founding editor of Refinery29's Money Diaries turned media entrepreneur, joins me for the penultimate episode to talk about: Why most conversations about money are really about time What she learned about our culture from monitoring the Money Diaries comments section Leaving a job, even when it means sacrificing financial security for emotional security What's really driving our “obsession with FI/RE” The dark side of optimization Subscribe to my weekly newsletter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://moneywithkatie.com/newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Get your copy of Rich Girl Nation, one of Barnes & Noble's Best Business Books of 2025:⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.moneywithkatie.com/rich-girl-nation⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Transcripts, show notes, resources, and credits at: https://moneywithkatie.com/the_mwk_show/lindsey-stanberry-judge-hide-admit/ — Money with Katie's mission is to be the intersection where the economic, cultural, and political meet the tactical, practical, personal finance education everyone needs. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston cover the latest developments in the WWE Ring Boy lawsuit, as a judge rules that most of the plaintiffs' claims will proceed to discovery.They also discuss John Cena's final match and the business impact it generated, along with Mick Foley publicly cutting ties with WWE over Donald Trump.Topics this week include:Warner Bros. Discovery's board is approving Netflix's bid and rejecting ParamountJudge allows the WWE Ring Boy lawsuit to move forward on most claimsJohn Cena's final match and its business implicationsMick Foley ends his relationship with WWE over Donald TrumpNick Khan set to be deposed in the WWE shareholder lawsuitNielsen Gauge ratings for NovemberWWE Raw on Netflix viewershipWWE SmackDown and AEW Collision ratings analysisMusic courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/wrestlenomics.comOur Sponsors:* Check out Progressive: https://www.progressive.comAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, joined The Guy Benson Show today to discuss several high-profile immigration and public safety cases, including the release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant accused of crimes such as human trafficking and domestic violence who was freed despite DHS efforts to deport him. Benson and McLaughlin also discussed the outrageous case of Edis Renan Diaz, an illegal immigrant convicted of raping a disabled woman who was controversially praised by an Obama federal judge for his "family devotion" and willingness to do work others would not. McLaughlin also addressed the misleading portrayal of Sae Joon Park by a member of Congress, clarified the status of Guan Heng, and more. Listen below. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf

In the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subramanian delivered final jury instructions that laid out the legal framework the jurors must follow as they deliberate on the charges. He emphasized the presumption of innocence, reminding jurors that the burden of proof rests entirely on the government and that Combs is not required to prove anything or call any witnesses. The judge explained that the prosecution must prove each element of every charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that speculation, bias, or media narratives have no place in the jury room. He cautioned jurors to evaluate the evidence objectively, including the credibility of witnesses, and warned against letting emotions, celebrity, or public opinion sway their verdict.Subramanian also gave detailed explanations of the legal definitions behind each charge Combs faces, including the alleged predicate acts tied to sex trafficking, conspiracy, and obstruction. He clarified that even if jurors find certain behavior distasteful or immoral, it is not criminal unless it meets the specific legal thresholds outlined. Jurors were instructed to consider each count separately, and not to infer guilt on one charge simply because they believe guilt on another. Additionally, he reiterated the importance of unanimous agreement for any verdict and instructed them not to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury room, nor consume any media coverage about it. The instructions closed with a reminder that the rule of law—not fame, wealth, or notoriety—governs the courtroom.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.424.0.pdf

John Pollock and Brandon Thurston cover the latest developments in the WWE Ring Boy lawsuit, as a judge rules that most of the plaintiffs' claims will proceed to discovery.They also discuss John Cena's final match and the business impact it generated, along with Mick Foley publicly cutting ties with WWE over Donald Trump.Topics this week include:Warner Bros. Discovery's board approving Netflix's bid and rejecting ParamountJudge allows the WWE Ring Boy lawsuit to move forward on most claimsJohn Cena's final match and its business implicationsMick Foley ends his relationship with WWE over Donald TrumpNick Khan set to be deposed in the WWE shareholder lawsuitNielsen Gauge ratings for NovemberWWE Raw on Netflix viewershipWWE SmackDown and AEW Collision ratings analysisVIDEO VERSION: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2bY8OaYFwMusic courtesy: “Panic Beat” by Ben TramerPOST WrestlingSubscribe: https://postwrestling.com/subscribePatreon: http://postwrestlingcafe.comForum: https://forum.postwrestling.comDiscord: https://discord.com/invite/Q795HhRTwitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @POSTwrestlingBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/postwrestling.comWrestlenomicsSubscribe: https://wrestlenomics.com/podcast/Patreon: https://patreon.com/wrestlenomicsSubstack: https://wrestlenomics.substack.com/Twitter/Facebook/Instagram/YouTube: @WrestlenomicsBluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/wrestlenomics.comSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/wrestlenomics/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports on the ongoing evidence trial in the Luigi Mangione case.

This Day in Legal History: Project Blue Book EndsOn this day in legal history, December 17, 1969, the U.S. Air Force officially terminated Project Blue Book, its two-decade-long investigation into unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Launched in 1952 during a peak in UFO sightings and Cold War anxiety, Project Blue Book reviewed over 12,000 reports of aerial phenomena. The Air Force concluded that most sightings could be explained by natural phenomena, aircraft, or hoaxes, and found no evidence of extraterrestrial activity or threats to national security. With its closure, the government effectively stepped back from public-facing UFO investigations, although some believe military interest continued behind closed doors.Legally, the end of Project Blue Book catalyzed decades of litigation and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, as citizens, journalists, and researchers sought access to government-held UFO data. The skeptical legal view has often emphasized that classified information typically relates to military technology or surveillance programs, not alien spacecraft. Despite popular culture's fixation on extraterrestrials, courts have routinely deferred to executive branch claims of national security in resisting full transparency.While the project's conclusion did not trigger direct legislation, it helped shape a legal culture around government secrecy, classification standards, and the public's right to know. It also fueled persistent legal tension between conspiratorial narratives and evidentiary standards. As UFOs—now reframed as “unidentified anomalous phenomena” (UAPs)—have resurfaced in congressional hearings in recent years, Blue Book remains a touchstone for the limits of disclosure and the enduring gap between public curiosity and provable claims.Skepticism remains warranted: decades later, no clear evidence has emerged to support the claim of extraterrestrial contact—despite tens of thousands of pages released and re-litigated under FOIA.U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston expressed openness to again striking down a Trump policy that allows for the rapid deportation of migrants to third countries without meaningful notice or an opportunity to raise fears of persecution or torture. The case challenges Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policies that permit deportation to countries other than a migrant's country of origin, often with as little as six hours' notice. Judge Murphy had previously issued an injunction in April to halt such deportations, arguing they violated due process, but the Supreme Court paused that order in June via its “shadow docket” without providing detailed reasoning.Despite acknowledging the likely involvement of the Supreme Court again, Murphy indicated that he may still rule on the merits of the case, though any decision would likely be temporarily stayed. The lawsuit, a class action, targets a DHS memo from March and guidance from July that permits deportations based on “credible” diplomatic assurances. Plaintiffs argue these policies fall short of constitutional protections, while the Justice Department insists migrants already have opportunities to raise objections during proceedings. The judge criticized the lack of clarity from the Supreme Court's earlier intervention and emphasized the importance of due process in removal proceedings.US judge open to again striking down Trump policy on third-country deportations | ReutersA Trump-appointed federal appeals court judge has argued that constitutional rights do not extend to immigrants who entered the United States unlawfully, a position he laid out in a partial dissent in a Second Amendment case. Sixth Circuit Judge Amul Thapar agreed with upholding a federal ban on firearm possession by undocumented immigrants but rejected the majority's reasoning. Instead, he argued the case should have been resolved by declaring that only U.S. citizens are included in “the people” protected by the Constitution. Thapar relied heavily on the Constitution's preamble and an originalist reading of history, asserting that the Founders never intended constitutional protections to apply to non-citizens, especially those unlawfully present.The majority opinion rejected that framing, pointing to Supreme Court precedent recognizing that non-citizens who develop substantial connections to the country may invoke constitutional rights. Thapar went further, suggesting that even the First and Fourth Amendments were not originally meant to protect non-citizens. The case arose from a challenge by a Guatemalan national convicted of unlawfully possessing firearms, but Thapar's reasoning reached far beyond gun regulation. His dissent echoes arguments long advanced by the Trump administration and aligns with his status as a former Trump Supreme Court shortlist candidate.From my perspective, this is a racist, xenophobic, and profoundly ahistorical take that threatens to usher in a shameful new era of American jurisprudence. It reflects either a fundamental misunderstanding of constitutional law or a wanton, careerist obsequiousness to Trumpism, delivered with the unmistakable tone of someone auditioning for a Supreme Court seat while extolling the flavor of boot. Judge Thapar is an embarrassment to the bench.Judge Thapar's theory represents a fundamental shift away from the traditional understanding of constitutional rights as inherent and inalienable—that is, rights present in every individual that the government is bound to respect, not rights it doles out at its discretion. By asserting that non-citizens, especially those here unlawfully, are not part of “the people” and therefore not entitled to constitutional protections, Thapar effectively treats these rights as government-bestowed privileges rather than limits on state power–that should frighten citizens, as well.But if rights are inherent, as our legal tradition holds, and yet non-citizens don't possess them, the implication is clear: they are being denied not because of legal status, but because of a presumed inferiority. That's not a theory of constitutional law—it's a supremacist framework gussied up in originalist language.Trump-appointed judge argues US Constitution's rights do not extend to non-citizens | Reuters3-D animator Eric Ryder filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in California federal court against Disney and director James Cameron, alleging that the 2022 film Avatar: The Way of Water copied substantial elements from his science fiction story KRZ. Ryder claims he collaborated with Cameron's Lightstorm Entertainment in the late 1990s on developing a film based on KRZ, and that key features of Avatar 2—including anthropomorphic beings, a vast oceanic world, and an exploitative Earth corporation mining a moon called Europa—mirror those from his work.Ryder previously sued over the first Avatar film in 2011, but that case was dismissed when a California state court ruled Cameron had created Avatar before Ryder submitted his material. Ryder insists this new case is not an attempt to relitigate the past, but rather to address new alleged acts of copying specific to The Way of Water, such as the central plot point involving an animal-based substance that extends human life, which he says did not appear in the original Avatar.Ryder is seeking at least $500 million in damages and a court order to block the release of the upcoming Avatar 3: Fire and Ash. His lawyer described the alleged copying as “blatant and egregious.” Disney and Lightstorm have not yet commented publicly on the lawsuit.Disney, James Cameron sued for copyright infringement over ‘Avatar' | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

-Warner Bros. Discovery's board has formally rejected the $108 billion takeover bid from Paramount Skydance. WBD said it remains committed to its $82.7 billion deal with Netflix, which would close some time next year, pending regulatory approval. -Amazon is in discussions with OpenAI to invest $10 billion in the company while supplying more of its AI chips and cloud computing services, according to The Financial Times. The deal would push OpenAI's valuation over $500 billion but is likely to raise more questions about the company's circular investment agreements involving chips and data centers. -Back in 2022, the California DMV accused the automaker of using deceptive language to advertise those products and making it seem like its vehicles are capable of level 5 autonomous driving. Tesla has since added the word “Supervised” to the name of its Full Self-Driving assistance technology. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

YouTube Addition: In this passage, Saul is tormented, God's Spirit has left him, and his kingdom is unraveling. But in the shadows, a young David is faithfully preparing. He's not on the throne yet, but he's already carrying the Spirit of God, and when the moment comes, his obedience, humility, and skill open the door to God's greater plan. This message is a sobering reminder: don't miss the lesson of Saul. Judgment is real. But so is the quiet preparation of the Spirit. Be like David, faithful in the background, ready when God calls. “The Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul… but the Lord was with David.” – 1 Samuel 16

Visit: RadioLawTalk.com for information & full episodes! Follow us on Facebook: bit.ly/RLTFacebook Follow us on Twitter: bit.ly/RLTTwitter Follow us on Instagram: bit.ly/RLTInstagram Subscribe to our YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UC3Owf1BEB-klmtD_92-uqzg Your Radio Law Talk hosts are exceptional attorneys and love what they do! They take breaks from their day jobs and make time for Radio Law Talk so that the rest of the country can enjoy the law like they do. Follow Radio Law Talk on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter & Instagram!

I'm truly honoured to be invited back again to play for this year's Afterhours FM Annual End of Year Broadcast. Broadcast, Wednesday 17th December 2025 Enjoy my exclusive guest mix for the Afterhours FM End of Year Countdown 2025. Tracklistings 01.Sneijder & Holly Kirby - Close To Home [Afterdark] 02.Angelus - Hocus Pocus [Regenerate Records] 03.Marc Dawn - Expander (2K25 Sasha Vatoff Remix) [Drizzly Eclipse] 04.Sneijder & Paul Miller - En Route [Who's Afraid Of 138?!] 05.Dan Cooper & Torsten Stenzel vs Dj Sakin & Fiends - Braveheart (Protect Your Mind) [Armada Captivating] 06.Tai Woffinden & Saltwater - The Legacy [Armada Captivating] 07.Mauro Picotto - Iguana (Mark Sherry's TH3RTY Remix) [Black Hole] 08.Allen Watts & Will Rees - Pendulum [FSOE] 09.Inversed - When Tears Fall [One Forty] 10.Enigma State - State Of Mind (Bryan Kearney Remix) [Kearnage] 11.Svenson & Gillen x Nifra - The Beauty Of Silence [Black Hole] 12.Jerome Isma-Ae, Gabry Ponte - Hold That Sucker Down [Armada Music] 13.York - The Awakening (Stowers & Cooper Remix) [Armada Captivating] 14.ID - ID Artist/Label Promos & General Enquires dj.tombradshaw@gmail.com Check out all my social media links linktr.ee/djtombradshaw

We would love to pray for you! Please send us your requests here. --------This Christmas, you can shine the light of Christ into places of darkness and pain with a purchase from the Joni and Friends Christmas catalog. You are sending hope and practical care to people with disabilities, all in the name of Jesus! Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

A repeated pattern among our Trump Deranged unelected, black-robed, tyrannical, inferior, federal district trial court judges is that the start presiding over cases with an anti-Trump decision already determined and then spew world-salad to achieve that outcome. More often than not, their feckless legal reasoning gets checked by their bosses on the relevant federal court of appeals, which then in the normal process of such things returns the case to the original trial judge for further litigation—ONLY to have that lower fabricate a SECOND world-salad order achieving the same pre-determined anti-Trump goal. This week we've seen this cycle happen yet again with Federal Judge Indira Talwani and the Planned Parent abortion case. Congress had passed a statute this year that sharply constrained financing for federally-funded abortions, Planned Parenthood sued in federal court in Massachusetts, and Judge Talwani has repeatedly issued world-salad orders freezing that statute—and has been repeatedly checked, again this week, by the court of appeals.

The wildly Trump Derangement Afflicted unelected, black-robed, tyrannical, inferior federal district trial court Judge Count Boasberg has been checked hard by the DC Court of Appeals, following an ABSOLUTELY SCATCHING filing by the Trump administration kindly asking the judicial adults to step in and check this mad trial court judge.

Witnesses took the stand on the first day of the trial of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan. She's charged with helping a man evade federal immigration officers. Wisconsin's attorney general says the Trump administration has defied the law dozens of times. And, it's been one year since the shooting at Madison's Abundant Life Christian School.

Retatrutide is years away from FDA approval and yet the fight over access, price, control of this medication is already well underway. That's what this podcast is going to be about today. There's well over a hundred thousand people by my estimates who are already on some form of this medication today. And that should tell you enough about how disruptive this molecule is and will be. It is a game changer among game changer. We've been talking about it for three years here at On The Pen, well before any of your favorite gym bros were talking about Retatrutide. We were talking about Reta, who tried Retatrutide here at On The Pen. And that's because we identified this triple agonist as a game changer among game changers. So This is going to be a very Retatrutide heavy episode, and so I hope you'll join us and stick with us if this is a topic you enjoy, because I think this is really going to effectively lay the groundwork for what accessibility to this medication will look like. So let's get into it. Welcome to the On The Pen Podcast with your host, Dave Knapp. Welcome to the On The Pen, the weekly dose podcast. This is our weekly roundup in incretin memetic news. And frankly, there's no news that is bigger than Reta-Trutide news. Just find me any news that is bigger than the data that we got on Reta-Trutide. Now, we already did a video about the Triumph Phase II clinical trials that we got in osteoarthritis of the knee. You can go back and check out that video if you'd like more data. So we're not gonna super... rehash the data. We'll go over at a high level what the data showed us. We're not going to go over how the medicine works, because by now we all know that it's the triple agonist, right? If terzapatide was a dual agonist, GLP-GIP, Retatrutide is the triple agonist that adds to it a glucagon component, which is absolutely just shredding, shredding liver fat. It is absolutely revving up people's metabolism and showing a tremendous amount of weight loss. So let's get into what the weight loss looked like in this first trial, because there are longer obesity trials where, where the primary outcome is the weight loss this was again a specific trial in measuring pain reduction in folks with osteoarthritis of the knee but check out these numbers these are placebo adjusted meaning it's taking the two percent out that people lost on placebo but looking at these numbers Folks on one milligram over forty eight weeks lost seventeen percent. They bumped up to four milligrams. Those folks lost twenty two percent. So right there at the lowest dose, you're already reaching the efficacy of today's drugs that are on the market, like triseptide and semaglutide in their various forms. If you bumped up to eight milligrams, you saw twenty four percent placebo adjusted weight loss and at twelve milligrams, twenty six point four percent weight loss. Adding back in that two percent of the placebo that those on placebo loss, that's twenty eight point four percent weight loss in these forty eight weeks at the highest dose. When you adjust for some of the more real world outcomes, you kind of ding the numbers a little bit based upon people who quit the drug, et cetera. Those numbers look more like a twenty percent weight loss and twenty three point seven percent weight loss at the highest dose. But even then, you're still seeing a drug that is better than the current drugs that are on the market. around forty eight percent of patients on Retatrutide lost greater than twenty five percent. And then if you were at that twelve twelve milligram dose, that highest dose patients lost fifty nine percent of patients lost more than twenty five percent of their body weight. There was a subset that lost thirty percent of their body weight and some even over thirty five percent of their body weight on Retatrutide. So the lower doses compete with today's best drugs and the upper doses are entering into bariatric surgery level weight loss. And that's putting the whole obesity system on notice and probably a lot of surgeons nervous because typical body weight loss was something like the street sleeve gastrectomy. For example, it's about eighteen to twenty five percent body weight. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass twenty five to thirty five percent weight loss or the duodenal switch thirty to forty percent weight loss. So the upper doses of Ritutrutide overlap with sleeve and bypass outcomes without any surgery. It's incredible. It is a game changer among game changer. It is the new benchmark in obesity medicine. And there's actually more data, like I said, landing in later twenty twenty six. The longer duration will historically, if history is a marker, equal more weight loss than we even see here at this forty eight weeks. We have an interview that will be airing later this week on our channel and on our podcast with our friend Mimi from Australia who just wrapped up her clinical trial on Retatrutide. They ended it like ten weeks early on her, which was a huge bummer to her. So we're going to hear from her because she had to end abruptly. We're going to hear her story, an incredible story. She's one of those folks that got up that thirty five percent body weight loss in the time that she was on Retatrutide. So, this is just showing you that these drugs are not simply an alternative to bariatric surgery. We are approaching a point in time where these are on par with bariatric surgery, and as people are on this Reta-Trutide trial, you see that these numbers aren't plateauing either. So we will see stronger weight loss numbers the longer that these folks are on this trial. And I think you'll see some of those numbers in that population of folks on the higher doses eclipse maybe even some of what we see with some of these bariatric surgeries. the real story that i think is taking shape here is not in how powerful Retatrutide is because we've literally been expecting or anticipating this kind of data for more than three years at on the pin we've been talking about this and i think that's sort of reflected in the fact that you didn't see this massive spike in eli lilly stock wall street was expecting this as well Um, so it was on par, I think with expectations, but the expectations are astronomical compared to previous options that were available to patients and all the innovation in the world. All of these drugs, we talked at last week about WV, E double Oh seven, the James Bond of weight loss that targets fat, not only targets fat loss, but it also targets the promotion of building of, of lean muscle mass. We're talking about an insane future in obesity medicine. But none of it means anything if people can't access it. And that's really where we are today in terms of ensuring that there's going to be an option for everyone. And that's sort of what I want to get into today, because Lilly wants Retatrutide to be classified as a biologic, so not a traditional small molecule drug like you've seen every other incretin and nutrient-stimulated hormone-treating obesity on the market to date. They're trying to get this classified as a biologic. Now, we talked about this before on the podcast. That matters in three major ways. It affects the exclusivity length of time that a pharmaceutical company has on a drug. That goes from, I believe, five years of market exclusivity to twelve. It affects compounding rules because biologics cannot be compounded. And then that gives the pharmaceutical companies a tremendous amount of pricing power in the marketplace, because essentially there's no competition and there's no competition for a long time. But this whole argument about getting this classified as a biologic is not about safety. It's about protection and we're going to get into it. So let's explain this here. This is why Retatrutide really is not a biologic arguably. So biologics are large proteins. There are hundreds of or even thousands of amino acids grown in living cells that are sensitive to tiny manufacturing changes. Retatrutide is a short chain peptide. It's chemically synthesized and it is below the traditional biological size thresholds when it comes to how those things are defined. We'll just leave it at that. So even though it acts like a biologic in the body, it's made like a drug. It's made like a small molecule drug. And if it's treated as a drug, they get, like I said, five years of market exclusivity. Now, really a lot of confusion around what this means, but essentially the first five years of the life of a drug, the patent can be challenged for a number of reasons. We've seen patent challenges right now are going on in the courts for both semaglutide and terzepatide. But these companies are guaranteed that five years of market exclusivity, no matter how those patent lawsuits shake out. That five years jumps to twelve years with the biologic. So ultimately, there's no biosimilars that are allowed during that twelve year window. Again, with terzapatidin and semaglutide, it's five years. They could lose their market exclusivity within five years of the release of the patent. twelve years with a biologic. So if they lose their patent challenges on Trezabitide, they still have some time left with market exclusivity for the drug. They likely will not lose those, but that jumps to twelve years. And I think the most important thing to understand about the reclassification of Reta-Trutide to a biologic would mean that, 503A and 503B pharmacies are effectively locked out of compounding this medication, 503Bs would have some latitude arguably, but they would face extreme barriers. Routine compounding becomes legally and technically restricted because biological status doesn't slow compounding down. It actually shuts the door or almost completely shuts the door. Biologics not only would allow Lilly to have longer market exclusivity, no compounding, but it would allow them to command a higher price in the marketplace because A, they get this designation and there's an assumption when they bring this to market that they're harder to manufacture, that they're harder to copy, that there are fewer negotiating alternatives for payers. They can command a higher price with the insurance companies, and the price pressure stays muted for much longer because, again, you don't have those pressures of compounding. You don't have the pressures externally from lawsuits that could end your market exclusivity in that first five years of the drug's existence. So there's just a lot of price pressure upwards on a biologic compared to a normal small molecule drug. And when there's no credible alternative or backup option, which to Retatrutide, there wouldn't be, it'd be the first drug that has bariatric surgery level results. The prices won't come down. They'll command a massive price and the prices won't come down. So let's talk about where this currently stands because ultimately the Eli Lilly went to the FDA. We've been covering this for well over a year, maybe close to two years now, a year and a half at least. Lily went to the FDA, they said, we want this classified as a biologic, here are the reasons why. The FDA initially said, no, we're not gonna do that. So Lily challenged that decision in court. So the point that we're at today is the court told the FDA to reconsider and better explain itself So the first no given to the FDA to Lilly didn't stick. The courts looked at it and they said, you need a better, you need to reconsider your decision and you need to explain your decision better to Lilly. So ultimately we're sitting now at the point where the court has made its decision that the FDA has to go back and now we await basically what the FDA has to say on this. But if this thing is classified as a biologic, that would be a massive massive loss for patients. Now, again, we're, we're focusing on the accessibility of this drug into the future. And, and I think that this is an important conversation to have. One of the interesting points that I have to bring into the conversation is the fact that I got to sit in on a, on a closed session question and answer with the media. I didn't get to answer or, excuse me, excuse me, ask a question at this time, but shortly after the most favored nations announcement, with eli lilly and the trump administration in the oval office that day there was a press briefing that i was invited to dave ricks was asked by max bayer reporter of endpoints who we've interviewed here on this very podcast and he was asked was Retatrutide included in the most favored nations discussions meaning will we get a cash pay version of Retatrutide uh that is you know circumventing the pbms uh will we get these cheaper prices will will it be be two hundred fifty dollars also and there was a hard no there was a hard no like no that was not included that was not part of these discussions even though what we heard from the trump administration was that those these companies that were jumping on to the most favored nations agreement were also agreeing to offer future drugs at most favored nations pricing now was lily saying that no they're not going to offer it at the it wasn't part of the negotiations in terms of the price points that they had discussed for triseptide maybe or did it mean altogether there won't be a cash pay option of this medication i don't know um that we would love to get clarity on But I highly doubt we're going to get any more information than necessary at this point in time. So, Reta-Trutide is being positioned to be a drug that, and well so, should be offered at a premium. This is a drug that is far exceeding the current drugs that are on the market. I think that we're gonna see even the indications of Reta-Trutide far beyond simple obesity, but it is going to be their crown jewel for the next decade, more than likely. Reta-Trutide is going to be a massive drug, and so they're attempting to build a moat around it. And these are things that we need to be aware of as a community so that we can hold our positions and conversations about these and basically, you know, be able to articulate to people in positions of power like this is an important thing to us. This is an important thing in the advocacy of obesity and sort of the next frontier of the fight of accessibility, which marches on. each and every day because of course the current drugs, while as great as they are and as much as access is expanding, there are still people with sicker or rather more advanced versions of metabolic disease that are gonna need these newer treatments and price is going to be a huge factor. So let's talk about the gray market right now because I think it's also nearly impossible to talk about this topic without including a discussion about the gray market because there are, as I mentioned at the outset, hundreds of thousands of people on this medication already. So research grade Retatrutide exists. It's in the gray markets of the Internet. It's where people are going and they're buying, you know, basically versions of these these peptides that are made in factories overseas. They're being imported into the United States, oftentimes illicitly in shipments that are marked as something else. The FDA has tried to crack down. There's no doctor involved in this. It's a very, that's why it's called the gray market, right? So it's not a prescription medicine, but the demand for this is massive. And all you have to do is really scroll your TikTok for about fifteen minutes. You're going to come across a insane amount of content on the topic of Retatrutide. An insane amount of, and oftentimes, you know, what I find most disturbing is oftentimes it looks like very young people. very young people taking Retatrutide. Crazy, it's crazy. But the demand is massive and there's a whole gray market for it proliferating over on TikTok and in the far reaches of the internet. And I would estimate that tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people are already or have already used it. And I think it's a testament to a to to the effectiveness of this drug. It's also a testament to the fact that there needs to be more guardrails, I think, around this stuff than there currently is, because gray markets appear and they thrive when legal access lags the reality of the demand for the medication. And you saw this earlier this week as we launched a petition to fight back against the Safe Drug Act of twenty twenty five, a drug, a drug act that is in theory designed to put guardrails around compounding. But in practice, I think is creating a new battlefield for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk to shut down compounding on the current classes of medications, which is why We as a community need to be loud about our opposition to it. If they were really concerned about the safety of compounds, they would do two very simple things. They would require reporting around the active pharmaceutical ingredient of a compound. Patients ought to be able to know where the actual source of their medication is coming from. And they should know that those places are FDA approved and inspected. And the second thing is they should require adverse event reporting. Those are required of 503Bs. They should be required of 503As as well. 503As are making a tremendous amount of money. They're making thousands and thousands of these scripts. So when there are adverse events, they should be required to report those to the FDA. Simple. None of that is in this bill. None of it. None of it. Instead, it seeks to put caps on the amount of compounds that can be made by a compound pharmacy without them having to report to the FDA. And then it seeks to codify the definition of essential copy. Again, all of these things that will become law and then argued in court and then a battlefield for Lilly to potentially win a legal battle and thwart compounding. It's creating a new battlefield for them. They're losing in the courts. They're losing with the current language that exists in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. So we create new language. We create new law. Just vague enough to pull some threads and hopefully win something in court. That's how I see it. You may see it differently. If you do, curious to hear from you. But if you want to fight back against this legislation, you can go to otplinks.com and fight back against that. piece of legislation, because I think that we need as a community to have our voices heard on this, especially those who have gotten healthier by way of compounded medications. So the rumor on the gray market, to get back and close the thought loop here, There's been no specific FDA cutoff announced, but what the rumors going around are that that the compounded versions of GLP ones, especially obesity medicine in the gray market, are all going to turn off like a sieve on January first. Now, I seem to feel like this is probably more of a marketing tactic by these companies to sell a whole bunch of peptides at the end of the year. I think that's probably creating some panic and probably panic buying on people's parts. And so these companies are benefiting greatly. Again, that's why there should be guardrails around this. There's no guardrails around this at all. I mean, at the end of the day, they can say whatever they want to say, so long as they cloak everything in research grade. And these rumors proliferate around and people spend thousands, tens of thousands of dollars. I've heard of people having twenty years worth of Retatrutide in their freezer. Why? For what purpose do you need that? So just a massive amount of money made in this gray market. And that's not to knock people who use it. I say this all the time, but I think it's worth qualifying the statement. It's not knocking people who use it. I get it. But at the same time, we're talking about an industry that is, there's no altruism here. They're in it for money just as much as Eli Lilly is, except they have actually done nothing in the way of advancing medicine. They've just taken intellectual property, copied it, and sold it to you with a label that says, don't put this in your body. So you know where I stand on the gray market. I've heard from many people who've been injured by gray market stuff. It's just what it is. It's a gray market. You're taking your health into your own hands. Please, whatever you're doing out there, as risky as it may be, please involve your doctor and let your doctor know what you're doing so you can be monitored for the things your doctor believes you should be monitored for if you're using this. But this all underscores, again, the need for accessibility to these medications, the need for us to be aware of the fact that a moat is already being built around the most advanced metabolic drug in the pipeline. And we just need to be aware so that when it comes time to fight, we're all ready and informed. And that's what this podcast is serving to do. Before we jump into the next topic, I do want to thank our sponsor, our headline sponsor of this podcast. is a company called Shed. Now, if you are looking for access to care for obesity, then look no further than our partners at Shed who believed in this podcast enough to help us do it full time. You can go to Trished.com and use code OTP25 to save twenty five percent at Trished.com, where you're going to get connected to a doctor who will when medically necessary prescribe medication to treat your obesity. You also get access to coaching. You'll get access to all sorts of medication, whether it's the branded or the compounded versions, depending on your specific situation. All of it is available at Trished.com. They use one of my favorite compound pharmacies in the game, Strive Pharmacy, which I've gotten the chance to dig into on my own. I really love what they do there. They're a It functionally operates a lot more like a 503B. Uh, and I think that they're doing great work over at a strive pharmacy. They partner with shed. So I just love this, this, and when we were looking for somebody to offer a compounded versions, I wanted to make sure that I trusted the pharmacy. People always ask me, Dave, who, who should I go to? I'm like the pharmacy matters more than anything because you want to trust the source of your medication. So try shed.com use code OTP25. Listen, you're going to want to learn about taking any new medication before you take it. Learn about the potential side effects. Learn about the trade offs. There's no free lunch, but all of the information that you're going to need, you can find it. Try shed.com and be familiarizing yourself with all of your options there. So thank you to Shed for being a wonderful partner here at On The Pen. Now let's talk about some data that dropped. We're talking about accessibility and all of the sort of advancements in the world mean very little if people can't access it. That's why I think this data that dropped this past week from our friends over at Rowe is incredible. Absolutely game changing data. So check out this data. Real world telehealth data looking at sixty eight weeks. This is looking at patients who were enrolled in their row body program and on a GLP one specifically some maglutide mean weight loss in this study looked at again patients in over sixty eight weeks. The mean weight loss was sixteen point six percent on average. Thirty three percent of patients lost more than twenty percent and the safety in this study and looking at this data match the clinical trials. So what we're seeing here is that care for obesity can be delivered through a telehealth platform at scale and match clinical trial results. So that scalability decides how many people get access. There are not enough doctors out there to serve the over hundred million people in the United States living with overweight or obesity. so when you hear these blowhard doctors online calling all telehealth platforms except their own a pill mill or as i like to say pin mill the data is actually showing something quite different in that this type of obesity care can be delivered at scale through telehealth platforms it can meet people where they're at and allow people to get care without the shame, without the stigma, without their doctor just pointing to the door and saying, if you want a GLP-I, get out of my office. I ain't going to get it here. How ridiculous. But these people can go to platforms like Rho or Shed or any number of telehealth platforms that are out there and not only get access to medicine, but get access to care. So of course, not all telehealth companies are created equal. Of course, not all compound pharmacies are created equal. You want to do your homework and all of that. But this is data that shows that This kind of care can be delivered at scale via a virtual platform and show similar results to a clinical trial. I think, and this is peer reviewed data, and I think that this is just absolutely great news because when we talk about the problem, we need scalable solutions. The old brick and mortar ain't going to work when you don't have enough doctors to serve enough patients. If we want to get life-changing treatments like ritatratide or terzapatide, semaglutide, whatever, into the hands of the people who need it the most, we need companies to innovate scalable tech platforms that can meet patients where they are, that can leverage current technologies to find people the care that they need. And in this case, it's access to a doctor. It's access to a platform. It's access to prescription medication when appropriately prescribed. And it can be done, and it is being done. So I think this is great news, and will play a huge part in the future. As we talk about Retatrutide, even though it's a year and a half away, maybe a little bit longer, it's already exposing – the issues around accessibility and pricing. Hopefully there will be compounded versions available if they're medically necessitated, if there are shortages. We hope that the battleground for that is not already set and won by Lilly before this drug even comes to market. But there are strategies being done to keep people boxed out But I can tell you that whatever happens with Retatrutide, the future of obesity medicine is in virtual care. And platforms are rising to the occasion. Retatrutide hasn't reached patients yet, but it's already forcing the system to show us, you know, are you ready? Are you ready to deliver bariatric surgery level results at scale to the people who need them? So I am so thankful that you joined me here on this podcast today. Again, we love to talk about we're at a Retatrutide. If you're interested, we've been going live every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at eleven a.m. Central Time here on our YouTube channel, on our tick tock, on our X platform. We're doing that because there's enough news to bring you just about every single day. And we've been doing it for the last couple of weeks. If you've enjoyed it, let me know in the comments of the video on YouTube. Send me an email at David on the pen dot com. Uh, so every single Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and then we do a weekly rundown of the obesity medicine news every Tuesday. That's what this is. The weekly dose podcast. You can catch this on all of the platforms that you listen to your podcasts on, and please make sure to leave us a five star rating and review before you log out of your podcast app. That helps so much. I don't think you guys understand how much that helps, uh, the work that we do here to just train the podcast algorithms that this one is worth listening to. I hope you enjoyed today's podcast. If you did, drop it a thumbs up, five-star review, subscribe on YouTube, do all the things. Thank you for being here, and thank you for being the best part of what we do. We will catch you on the next one. Thank you, my friends. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

DeSoto County Justice Court Judge Karen Sanders was arrested on December 6, 2025, by Hernando Police for driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving after being pulled over. Despite the charges, she returned to the bench on December 15, 2025—nine days later—to preside over cases, including those involving similar offenses. Defendants expressed mixed reactions, with some shocked at her quick return and questioning her impartiality, feeling she might receive lenient treatment as a judge. Sanders' own court appearance for the charges is scheduled for April 1, 2026. The incident has sparked discussions on accountability for elected officials facing legal issues, drawing comparisons to cases like Hinds County DA Jody Owens continuing duties amid federal charges.

Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele was the trial-level judge in Palm Beach County who repeatedly denied efforts to unseal the secret grand jury transcripts from the 2006 grand jury that investigated Jeffrey Epstein in Florida. When media organizations such as The Palm Beach Post and others petitioned the court to release the secret testimony that might explain why Epstein received a lenient plea deal, Hafele ruled that under existing Florida law he did not have the authority to release those normally confidential records, even though public interest arguments were made about transparency and justice. His rulings maintained the traditional secrecy of grand jury proceedings and kept the transcripts sealed.That decision was overturned by the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal, which unanimously concluded that Hafele had erred in saying he lacked authority to release the records. The appeals court ruled that under state law grand jury records could be made public if doing so would “further justice,” and ordered Hafele (or the trial court) to review the materials and determine which parts could be released with appropriate redactions. In effect, Hafele's earlier closure was not the final word; the appellate ruling opened the door to unsealing at least portions of the grand jury transcripts, marking a key shift in the long battle over access to these Florida records.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

All rise for Judge Bex: the podcast where family feuds meet their match. Siblings and offspring go head-to-head over pets, homework, and just about everything else. Join Judge Bex as she hears the evidence, untangles the truth, and delivers a verdict. Support the show: https://funkidslive.com/plusSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on another 2020 election case involving President Trump.

Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord ## Episode Description In Episode 194 of Not on Record, seasoned Canadian criminal defense lawyers Joseph Neuberger and Michael Lacy dive deep into the realities of jury trials in Canada. Sparked by a recent National Post article exploring the inner workings of juries, they debate whether they'd choose a jury or a judge-alone trial if charged with a serious offense. The discussion covers the impact of the 2019 abolition of peremptory challenges, the challenges of selecting an impartial jury in today's polarized climate, the importance of storytelling and engagement in jury addresses, cultural shifts affecting civic duty and bias, and why many defense lawyers now lean toward bench trials especially in sexual assault cases. With candid insights from decades of trial experience, dog interruptions, and a call to restore peremptory challenges, this episode is a raw look at the strengths, flaws, and uncertainties of Canada's jury system.

-In Google's email announcement, however, it said it was discontinuing dark web reports because “feedback showed that it did not provide helpful next steps.” -A Louisiana law that would have required social media platforms to verify the ages of their users has been blocked by a judge. - Ford announced plans this week to reboot the F-150 Lightning as an EREV hybrid. An EREV is similar in concept to a plug-in hybrid but with a larger battery that's topped up by a gas generator — the powertrain itself is all electric. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

RICK NEUHEISEL (CBS Sports) Last time we talked to Coach, we were hoping he'd be getting a shot at the Coug head coaching job. That didn't happen, but he wishes nothing but the best for Kirby Moore. What will happen with the Michigan head coaching vacancy? Will Jedd leave Montlake? :30- The Old Judge is here! The honorable Cornelius Buckhole the 99th is presiding… - Bring on the rainy & windy weather on Thursday, it can only help the Seahawks against the Rams - Kirby Moore was the right hire for the Cougs - Murakami is on your Christmas wish list - Candy Cane is the Candy Corn of Christmas… :45- We close out the Tuesday show with one last thing! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode of “Fearless,” Jason Whitlock analyzes Patrick Mahomes' career-ending injury and compares it to Tom Brady's injury in 2008. While Brady had Bill Belichick to see him through his injury, Whitlock wonders who Mahomes will have. Whitlock also unpacks his NFL Truths of the week, discussing Shedeur Sanders reportedly being given the wrong play-calling wristband and using the mix-up as an excuse; J.J. McCarthy disobeying coaching staff by dancing on his way to the end zone; Sean Payton and the Broncos proving themselves; and more. Steve Kim joins the show to discuss Mahomes' future; Shedeur Sanders and “WristbandGate”; McCarthy's insubordination; the top teams in the NFL; Diego Pavia's obnoxious reaction to being the runner-up to winning the Heisman Trophy; and whether Fernando Mendoza will be remembered as a “mid” Heisman winner because of his stats. Wide-ranging show today — don't miss it! ​​Today's Sponsors: Craftco Flying Ace Whether you're winding down after a long day or raising a glass with good company, Flying Ace delivers every time. It's not about hype—it's about heritage, and getting back to what bourbon was always supposed to be. If that sounds like your kind of pour, it's time to level up. Buy online at https://flyingacespirits.com and use code BLAZE for free shipping. Conduit Clothing Conduit Clothing Company is a Christian apparel brand built for believers who refuse to sit quietly while the world drifts further from Truth. Go to https://conduitclothing.com and enjoy 10% off by using the code: FEARLESS at checkout. PreBorn This Christmas, you can help save a life for only $28. PreBorn's mission is to offer women the courage, faith, and support they need to choose life—a life that has the potential to change the world. Pick up your phone, dial #250 and say “Baby.” Or donate securely at https://PreBorn.com/FEARLESS. Do it now—because life matters. BlazeTV Gift Cards If you need a last-minute gift, or just want to give something that actually makes an impact, head over to https://giftblazetv.com and use promo code FEARLESS20 to get 20% off! Grab one today and send it straight to someone you love. Want more Fearless content? Subscribe to Jason Whitlock Harmony for a biblical perspective on everyday issues at https://www.youtube.com/@JasonWhitlockHarmony?sub_confirmation=1 Jeffery Steele and Jason Whitlock welcome musical guests for unique interviews and performances that you won't want to miss! Subscribe to https://youtube.com/@JasonWhitlockBYOG?sub_confirmation=1  We want to hear from the Fearless Army!! Join the conversation in the show chat, leave a comment or email Jason at FearlessBlazeShow@gmail.com Get 10% off Blaze swag by using code Fearless10 at https://shop.blazemedia.com/fearless Make yourself an official member of the “Fearless Army!” Support Conservative Voices! Subscribe to BlazeTV at https://www.fearlessmission.com and get $20 off your yearly subscription. Visit https://TheBlaze.com. Explore the all-new ad-free experience and see for yourself how we're standing up against suppression and prioritizing independent journalism. CLICK HERE to Subscribe to Jason Whitlock's YouTube: https://bit.ly/3jFL36G CLICK HERE to Listen to Jason Whitlock's podcast: https://apple.co/3zHaeLTCLICK HERE to Follow Jason Whitlock on X: https://bit.ly/3hvSjiJ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Remembering Rob Reiner's tremendous career and a film he made about his family. Amy Schumer and her husband announced their split. Dick Van Dyke is 100! Ryan Lochte is auctioning off his Olympic metals. Sarah is making a judgment on a not so shocking story out of Las Vegas. Matty shares a story that makes you wonder how he can be so judgmental. Are seasonal cookies the best holiday snack?

Charity Powell-Beallis spent nine months fighting for her life in the Arkansas court system. She reported that her husband strangled her in front of their children. She filed for divorce. She sought full custody. She told a state senator she feared for her life. She posted on Facebook that the system was protecting her abuser while silencing her as the victim. One day after a judge reportedly awarded joint custody to her estranged husband — a doctor with a domestic violence conviction — Charity and her six-year-old twins were found shot to death in their home. When her father called the court the day the bodies were discovered, Judge Shannon Blatt says he told a clerk she "might as well have pulled the trigger herself." The judge filed a police report against him. Randy Powell says he only called to ask if he could see his grandchildren's bodies. This video examines the custody ruling, the documented warning signs the court had access to, and the research showing that strangulation is the number one predictor of domestic violence homicide — increasing a woman's risk of being killed by 750 percent. We also look at the exposed facts that show family courts exposed a pattern where courts reject abuse allegations and award custody to abusive fathers at alarming rates. The investigation into the deaths is ongoing. No suspect has been named. No arrests have been made. We reached out to Judge Blatt's chambers for comment and have not received a response. If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, the National Domestic Violence Hotline is available 24/7: 1-800-799-7233. #CharityBeallis #JudgeShannon Blatt #ArkansasMurder #DomesticViolence #FamilyCourt #CustodyBattle #JudicialAccountability #SystemFailed #TrueCrime #JusticeForCharity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Charity Powell-Beallis spent nine months fighting for her life in the Arkansas court system. She reported that her husband strangled her in front of their children. She filed for divorce. She sought full custody. She told a state senator she feared for her life. She posted on Facebook that the system was protecting her abuser while silencing her as the victim. One day after a judge reportedly awarded joint custody to her estranged husband — a doctor with a domestic violence conviction — Charity and her six-year-old twins were found shot to death in their home. When her father called the court the day the bodies were discovered, Judge Shannon Blatt says he told a clerk she "might as well have pulled the trigger herself." The judge filed a police report against him. Randy Powell says he only called to ask if he could see his grandchildren's bodies. This video examines the custody ruling, the documented warning signs the court had access to, and the research showing that strangulation is the number one predictor of domestic violence homicide — increasing a woman's risk of being killed by 750 percent. We also look at the exposed facts that show family courts exposed a pattern where courts reject abuse allegations and award custody to abusive fathers at alarming rates. The investigation into the deaths is ongoing. No suspect has been named. No arrests have been made. We reached out to Judge Blatt's chambers for comment and have not received a response. If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic violence, the National Domestic Violence Hotline is available 24/7: 1-800-799-7233. #CharityBeallis #JudgeShannon Blatt #ArkansasMurder #DomesticViolence #FamilyCourt #CustodyBattle #JudicialAccountability #SystemFailed #TrueCrime #JusticeForCharity Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

JUDGE JESS: Am I Wrong For Admitting That I Hate My Christmas Present? full 330 Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:22:24 +0000 4bUcCD2cvsTlEKrV10IC1svRV9ZZ6XBn advice,judge jess,dilemma,music,society & culture,news Kramer & Jess On Demand Podcast advice,judge jess,dilemma,music,society & culture,news JUDGE JESS: Am I Wrong For Admitting That I Hate My Christmas Present? Highlights from the Kramer & Jess Show. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Music Society & Culture News False https://player.amperwa

We live in a culture trained to judge--quick to assume motives, tear down others, and play God. Jesus warns that a judgmental spirit destroys relationships and reveals a heart disconnected from the Father. In this message, you'll learn why judgment takes root, how mercy flows from real spiritual maturity, and how walking with the Father frees you to see clearly and love well. #BibleTeaching #Judgment #MercyWhy We Judge Others--and How Jesus Calls Us Out Of It | Jeremy Robertson | 12-14-2025

For more than a year, the murder of Judge Kevin Mullins has haunted Letcher County, Kentucky — not only because a sitting sheriff walked into a judge's chambers and executed him, but because no one understood why. Sheriff Mickey “Shawn” Stines and Judge Mullins had worked side by side for years. They ate lunch together hours before the shooting. Nothing added up. Until now. Newly exposed court documents and witness statements paint a devastating picture of Stines in the days leading up to the killing. He had dropped forty pounds in two weeks. He couldn't sit through a deposition without taking ten breaks. He told staff he was being ordered to hand over money and kill himself or shadowy forces would murder his family. He placed phone calls to relatives who'd been dead for years. Employees said he was in a full psychotic break — but the only intervention was telling him to see his family doctor. The next day, Judge Mullins was dead. This episode also uncovers the explosive context surrounding the shooting. Days before the murder, Stines was deposed in a federal civil rights case alleging widespread sexual coercion and abuse of power inside the courthouse — a scandal that had already produced a guilty plea from one official. Judge Mullins was named in the lawsuit. Some alleged acts took place in his chambers. Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins us to break down the behavioral unraveling, the institutional failures, and the systemic corruption surrounding this case. We examine the surveillance footage, the post-arrest bodycam video, and the lawsuit now filed by Mullins' widow accusing sheriff's office employees of ignoring the warnings. Was this murder the act of a man in psychosis — or the violent fallout of a courthouse protecting itself? Subscribe for full investigative coverage, behavioral analysis, and courtroom updates. #MickeyStines #KevinMullins #LetcherCounty #KentuckyCase #TrueCrimeNews #CourthouseMurder #RobinDreeke #AbuseOfPower #JusticeSystemFail #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On today's episode, Andy & DJ break down Erika Kirk's sharp response to the wild conspiracy theories circulating online about her jewelry coming just as the alleged killer in Charlie Kirk's case prepares for his first in-person court appearance, the controversial ruling from a federal judge ordering Kilmar Abrego Garcia to be released from ICE custody, and the growing outrage from Cracker Barrel diners who say a new company move has them furious.