Podcasts about Deposition

Justin Baldoni & Wayfarer failed to filed their second amended complaint. Did he really just give up his entire lawsuit? Plus, Leslie Sloan fights for her attorneys fees and releases new text! What does this mean for Blake Lively's case? Let's recap today's court hearing with Judge Liman!    Featuring: Dana Bowling  @Thisisdanabowling  Elsie  @elsrich   Lethal Lauren  @LethalLauren904   and Omar Serrato  @thetiltedlawyer     Get rid of nasty parasites with the gold-standard Ivermectin + Mebendazole Parasite Cleanse from The Wellness Company. Head to http://www.twc.health/nofilter and use code NOFILTER to save $90 plus Free Shipping. US Residents Only.    Bring on the good vibes & treat yourself to Soul today! Go to www.GetSoul.com promo code NOFILTER for 30% off.   Get your tour tickets to see No Filter with Zack Peter LIVE: https://www.x1entertainment.com/zackpeter    Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio   Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb   Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111   Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi   Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join   Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack

Johnny Depp says he was a crash test dummy for MeToo and has no regrets in suing Amber Heard. Is he ready for a Hollywood comeback? Today's Blake Lively's deposition day! And let's recap my weekend at VidCon with Dana Bowling!    Be prepared this summer – get the travel-friendly Medical Emergency Kit from The Wellness Company today! Visit http://www.twc.health/nofilter and use code NOFILTER for up to $45 off + Free Shipping on every order. Kits are for US residents only.   Bring on the good vibes & treat yourself to Soul today! Go to www.GetSoul.com promo code NOFILTER for 30% off.   Get your tour tickets to see No Filter with Zack Peter LIVE: https://www.x1entertainment.com/zackpeter    Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio   Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb   Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111   Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi   Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join   Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack

Rula patients typically pay $15 per session when using insurance. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at https://www.rula.com/rushhour! #rulapod Go to Quince dot com slash rushhour for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns.  

Now that the pandemic is fading from our memories, courts are showing a renewed willingness to order plaintiffs to appear in person for their depositions, even when a plaintiff has relocated to distant places and will incur considerable expense and inconvenience if forced to travel. In this episode, Jim Garrity dissects a brand-new court ruling on the topic, explains in detail why the plaintiff in that case failed to win a protective order requiring her to travel 2,000 miles back to the litigation forum. Then he offers crucial tactical advices for both plaintiffs and defendants when fighting this battle. SHOW NOTESOrder Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, Krishmar-Junker v. Kingline Equipment, Inc., Case No. 23-0431-KD-B, 2025 WL 1710041 (S.D. Ala. June 18, 2025) (court refused to issue protective order where plaintiff, who moved cross-country since filing her lawsuit, claimed financial and medical hardships but failed to meet her burden of a particularized showing of harm to justify relief)

CSI Litigation Consultant Linda Khzam joins Steve Wood, Ph.D. to discuss managing emotional and anxious witnesses during deposition prep. Drawing on her background in cognitive neuroscience and working with crime victims, Linda explains that many witnesses enter the litigation process with no understanding of what to expect, likening it to being dropped unprepared into a foreign country. She stresses the need to provide a clear roadmap, explaining logistics, roles, and expectations, to help witnesses feel grounded and prepared. A crucial aspect in witness preparation is identifying anxiety before it escalates. Linda describes signs such as rapid speech, over-explaining, or defensiveness as early indicators that a witness is becoming emotionally activated. She emphasizes the importance of mock questioning to surface these behaviors and help the attorney recognize when intervention is necessary. Witnesses are also encouraged to develop self-awareness around their “tells” and learn to pause and regulate themselves before they spiral. Sophisticated neurocognitive training teaches witnesses these tools. Linda and Steve emphasize that deposition prep must be tailored to each individual, especially those dealing with external stressors or trauma. She explains that emotional issues like guilt, fear of job loss, or personal crises can interfere with memory and decision-making during testimony. By building rapport with the witness, taking time to address personal challenges, and practicing in realistic conditions, witnesses can approach depositions with more clarity, control, and confidence.  Watch the video of the episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/euB

Join us for an in-depth look at a harrowing car accident case as New York personal injury lawyer Arkady Frekhtman consults with a client facing life-altering injuries. Hear firsthand about the complexities of a collision involving a pest control company vehicle, the client's journey through multiple surgeries including a lumbar fusion, and the critical decisions involved when seeking fair compensation. This episode delves into the nuances of insurance claims, case valuation, and the crucial role of expert legal advice when a victim doubts their current representation. Tune in to understand the challenges of navigating severe accident claims and the pursuit of justice.▶▶ CLICK BELOW TO GET A FREE CONSULT NOWhttps://bit.ly/atty-free-consultation▶▶  GIVE A REVIEW:https://bit.ly/review-fa▶▶  HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?:https://866attylaw.com/▶▶  CALL US NOW - FREE EVALUATION(212) 222-1111 or (866) ATTY LAW ▶▶  CONTACT US NOW - FREE EVALUATIONhttps://866attylaw.com/contact-us/▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬Chapter Timeline[00:00] Introduction to Case[01:00] Details of Accident[02:00] Victim's Injuries[03:00] Previous Surgeries[04:00] Current Legal Representation[05:00] Concerns About Lawyer[06:00] Insurance Coverage Discussion[07:00] Potential Case Value[08:00] IME and Deposition[09:00] Surveillance Footage Issue[10:00] Arkady's Assessment[11:00] Future Medical Costs[12:00] Lost Wages Claim[13:00] Pain and Suffering[14:00] Trial Strategy Options[15:00] Settlement Negotiation Advice[16:00] Importance of Second Opinion[17:00] Working with Co-Counsel[18:00] Next Steps for Victim[19:00] Q&A with Arkady[20:00] Final Thoughts and Advice[21:00] Closing RemarksABOUT FREKHTMAN & ASSOCIATESFrekhtman & Associates Injury Lawyers represent people who suffered a serious or life-changing injury and had their lives destroyed or disrupted because of the negligence of others.FREE CONSULTATION · NO FEE PROMISE · OVER $900 MILLION RECOVERED:Get To Know More About Us:▶▶ https://866attylaw.com/about-our-firm▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬✅ PRACTICE AREASToughest Injury Lawyers To Help You Get Justice With All Personal Injuries

In this episode, Zinda Law Group CEO Jack Zinda and trial attorney Max Massey share practical strategies that help attorneys deliver stronger results both in court and behind the scenes. Learn how telling your client's story effectively, narrowing your practice focus, and using impactful visuals can lead to better outcomes and deeper client trust.In This Episode, You'll Learn:How Telling Your Client's Story Improves Trial Success: Create emotional connection with jurors, adjusters, and judges by framing your case around your client's lived experience.Why Niching Down Can Build Authority and Grow Referrals: Fewer competitors and deeper expertise means more cases—and better ones.Translating Complex Facts Into Human Impact: Learn how to use expert insights and simple language to make technical details resonate.The Value of Joining TTLA: Access education, resources, and legislative advocacy to support your work as a trial lawyer in Texas.What Tort Reform Really Means for Your Clients: Understand the legal and financial realities affecting your clients' ability to recover full compensation.How “Day in the Life” Videos Help Maximize Settlements: Use visual storytelling to show the real impact of your client's injuries.Working with Translators and Building Trust Across Language Barriers: Preserve clarity, compassion, and connection with every client—no matter what language they speak.

Send me a DM here (it doesn't let me respond), OR email me: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comPaul Bonacci actually won a million-dollar lawsuit against Lawrence 'Larry' King. In his deposition, he claimed that he was inducted into a government program called Project MONARCH where they purposely split his personality through trauma, Satanism, and abuse so he could be molded into a puppet for their schemes. If you are well researched in this area, you will understand that someone like Sirhan Sirhan, the man who they used as a patsy in the Kennedy assassination, was clearly under the effects of a similar program. MK Ultra splits a person's personality so they can be given orders and then never remember what happened. It's the perfect way for them to commit a crime. CIA psychologist actually admitted that they could "create" a long gunmen in six months in declassified documents. Paul Bonacci went into great detail during his deposition. He also claimed that there was high level Satanism in these projects including blowing the whistle about the Temple of Sett."MONARCH was a program that used children to make multiple personalities, for future use, as spies and as a way to take over the United States government.When I first got involved, I was mo**ested by an airman at an air force base involved in MONARCH. His job was to recruit kids from the local neighborhood who they could make disassociate by doing traumatic things to them at a very young age."This is where his personality split occurred, who he called Wesley."If one was captured...the person that was captured, would go into a personality that would have no useful information. To seem as if he was indeed crazy...."CONNECT WITH THE IMAGINATION:EMAIL: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comMy Substack: https://emmakatherine.substack.com/BUY ME A COFFEE: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/theimaginationAll links: https://direct.me/theimaginationpodcastRIFE TECHNOLOGIES:https://realrifetechnology.com/15% Code: 420CZTL METHELENE BLUE:https://cztl.bz?ref=2BzG1Free Shipping Code: IMAGINATIONSupport the show

Attorney: Fresno Unified Needs to Find 'Nearest Exit' in Defamation Lawsuit Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive --- Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Attorney: Fresno Unified Needs to Find 'Nearest Exit' in Defamation Lawsuit Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive --- Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textIn this episode, Scott and Chasity reunite in-studio after several remote recordings to discuss their recent activities and introduce a special panel discussion about the Scientific Advisory Work Group (SAW). Scott shares his excitement about getting accepted into OSU for a master's program, while the hosts debate the value of continuing education in fire investigation. They emphasize the importance of bachelor's degrees for investigators before diving into the main interview segment.The featured interview, recorded in Michigan, includes guest co-host Lauren Guber (a California Deputy Attorney General) along with Dr. Elizabeth Buck and Brian Fine (retired from the Texas State Fire Marshal's Office). They discuss SAW, a program that originated in Texas to improve fire investigation through peer review. The panel explains how investigators present cases to a diverse group of experts who then evaluate whether the investigation meets scientific standards. This constructive criticism helps investigators strengthen their reports and testimony, ultimately leading to more credible courtroom presentations. Brian shares how investigators initially dreaded these reviews but eventually began voluntarily submitting cases to showcase their improved work.The group discusses the challenges fire investigators face in court, particularly in Daubert states where scientific testimony is more strictly evaluated. Lauren explains how prosecutors must prove both that fire investigation expertise is needed and that the specific investigator is qualified to provide it. The panel emphasizes that maintaining credibility is crucial, as a poor performance in one case can follow investigators throughout their careers.Dr. Buck discusses efforts to expand the SAW program beyond Texas, having recently introduced it to Michigan with hopes of bringing it to California next. The episode concludes with the "Can You Use It in a Sentence?" segment featuring "hot gas layer" as the next term in their educational series, following previous explanations of "plume" and "ceiling jet." Scott and Chasity also address fan mail, including a question about Scott's recent court case and feedback about standardizing fire damage classification terminology.Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed the episode, give us 5 stars, hit the follow button, and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you are listening in from. Follow us on social media!Instagram: @infocus_podcastLinkedIn: INFOCUS podcastFacebook: INFOCUS podcastTikTok: @infocus_podcast

Today's episode showcases four new deposition-related rulings, including one that makes a compelling case for using Rule 31 depositions by written questions; a second that underscores the need to proactively consider limiting deposition transcript distribution; a third that highlights rare exceptions to a party's right to attend depositions; and a fourth which reinforces the basic principle that deposition subpoenas duces tecum cannot be used to shorten Rule 34's 30-day document production timeline. Thanks for listening, and be sure to check out the book on which this podcast is based, 10,000 Depositions Later: The Premier Litigation Guide for Superior Deposition Practice - A User's Guide and Handbook on Deposition Tips, Tactics & Strategies for Civil, Administrative, Arbitrative and Criminal Litigation. Available on Amazon and just about everywhere else books are sold.SHOW NOTESKilmetis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, No. 24-CV-04452 (JMW), 2025 WL 1332056 (E.D.N.Y. May 7, 2025) (Rule 31 depositions)Hales v. Cook, et al., No. 1:24-cv45/ZCB, 2024 WL 5690279 (N. D. Fla. December 20, 2024) (on restricting distribution of deposition transcripts)Rupard, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al., No. 23-CV-1357 CAB (BLM), 2025 WL 1265858 (S. D. Cal. April 30, 2025) (on excluding parties from depositions in their own cases)Johnson v. Parks Floyd Investments, LLC, No. 2:23-cv-1063 SMD/KRS, 2025 WL 1191785 (D. New Mexico April 24, 2025) (on use of deposition subpoenas duces tecum to parties as a tool to circumvent and shorten the normal period for production of documents)

'I Never Said He Called My Son the N-Word.' Fresno Unified Trustee Thomas Tries to Erase Accusation Against Former Bullard Coach Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

'I Never Said He Called My Son the N-Word.' Fresno Unified Trustee Thomas Tries to Erase Accusation Against Former Bullard Coach Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Zinda Law Group CEO Jack Zinda and trial attorney Max Massey sit down for an honest conversation about the evolving realities of building a legal career and a sustainable law practice. From early job struggles to case strategy and managing the pressure of high-stakes litigation, Jack and Max trade stories, lessons, and the systems that help them keep improving. Whether you're managing your first caseload or leading a growing firm, this episode offers raw insights into the habits and mindsets that drive long-term success in personal injury law.Topics Covered:    Time Management & Work-Life Balance    Early Career Struggles & Career Growth    Diversification vs. Specialization    Dealing with Insurance Companies & Stowers Demands    Case Management Systems & Checklists    Assessing Case Value & Finding Recovery Sources    Lifelong Learning & Building a Support NetworkKey TakeawaysTime Management & Work-Life BalanceJack shares how segmenting time between work, family, and personal health helped him move from late-night burnout to better productivity. The conversation touches on prioritizing outcomes over hours and having the right support system.Early Career Struggles & Career GrowthMax opens up about his early challenges breaking into the field, including juggling multiple roles at a small firm. His journey underscores the importance of persistence, humility, and saying “yes” to opportunity.Diversification vs. SpecializationJack and Max reflect on experimenting with different practice areas early on — and how focusing on personal injury law brought clarity, consistency, and better results for clients.Dealing with Insurance Companies & Stowers DemandsThey break down the role of Stowers demands, how to verify information from adjusters, and why being proactive with documentation can make or break a claim.Case Management Systems & ChecklistsJack discusses treating every case like it's going to trial — and how detailed checklists, playbooks, and case reviews help create consistent outcomes.Assessing Case Value & Finding Recovery SourcesThe conversation includes insights on evaluating damages, controlling litigation costs, and navigating post-judgment collection when assets are limited.Lifelong Learning & Building a Support NetworkJack emphasizes the importance of mentorship, communities like TTLA, and staying curious — while still developing your own systems and principles over time.

If you haven't already deeply integrated AI into your deposition practice, buckle up! In this episode, Jim Garrity identifies five major use cases for AI when preparing to take or defend depositions. Then he offers cutting-edge tips for preparing winning AI "prompts," which are the instructions you'll give AI programs so they'll give you the exact assistance you need. Incredible topic and incredible tips, all in just 23 minutes. Thanks for listening!SHOW NOTES:The three AI apps we use currently are:ChatGPT.comhttps://x.com/i/grokPerplexity.ai

I spoke with a personal injury attorney, who has started a technology-first law practice. Episode Highlights 04:26 - Discussion on AI tools for document referencing. 07:00 - Rob discusses starting a successful law practice. 10:28 - Experimenting with legal tech as a new law firm. 11:59 - Efficient management of PI medical records. 13:34 - Use of AI in settlement demands. 16:10 - Deposition software evolution. 20:46 - Market opportunity for case strength analysis software. 22:32 - Discussion on managing practice in different states. Episode Resources Connect with Jared Correia jared@redcavelegal.com   https://redcavelegal.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/jaredcorreia https://twitter.com/RedCaveLegal www.linkedin.com/in/jaredcorreia/ Connect with Rob Hartigan https://lionhartlaw.com/  

In this episode of The Effective Lawyer, Zinda Law Group CEO and founder Jack Zinda answers listener-submitted questions about building a law firm that runs on systems—not chaos.If you're constantly putting out fires, working long hours, and struggling to grow your firm, Jack offers practical strategies to bring clarity, structure, and intentional leadership to your practice. He walks through his weekly planning system, explains how to create an “ideal week,” and shares tools for better delegation and follow-up.Whether you're a solo attorney or managing a growing team, this episode offers real-world advice to help you take back control of your time and build a scalable firm.In This Episode:    How systems create efficiency, scalability, and work-life balance    Jack's weekly planning and review process    Building an “ideal week” for energy and productivity    Strategies for delegation and consistent follow-up    The value of weekly reflection for continuous improvementContact Jack Zinda:jack@zindalaw.com512-246-2224

In this episode, Jim Garrity highlights three brand new deposition-related court rulings. The first presents the question of whether witnesses and their counsel can be prohibited from discussing the witnesses' testimony during recesses. The second addresses the propriety of asking foundational questions of privilege-bearing deponents to determine if the assertion of privilege is legitimate; the opinion explains what "foundational" questions are, gives examples, and details the procedure for deposing such witnesses and then presenting the issue to a court for decision. The third case in the spotlight highlights an avoidable problem when a lawyer seeks to depose an individual who has already testified in a 30(b)(6) capacity. Citations to the cases appear in today's show notes. Thanks for listening.SHOW NOTESVillareal v. Texas, Case No. 24-557, __ US __ (Apr. 7, 2025) agreeing to review ruling denying criminal defendant's request to confer about his testimony with his counsel during overnight breaks) petition for writ of certiorari at https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-557/331695/20241113121417971_cert%20petition%20Villarreal%20v%20Texas.pdf; Brief in Opposition at https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-557/348537/20250225093718236_250219a%20BIO%20for%20efiling.pdf; Reply Brief at https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-557/351275/20250305130135816_cert%20reply%2024-557%20Villarreal%20v%20Texas.pdfAllergan, Inc. et al. v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00431, 2025 WL 1006372 (M. D. Tenn. Apr. 3, 2025) (outlining the procedure for questioning witnesses claiming privilege, and holding that foundational questions about the allegedly privileged communications must be allowed to determine whether a privilege exists)In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, Case Number 22–MD–03047–YGR (PHK), 2025 WL 1009362 (N. D. Calif. Apr. 4, 2025) (denying request for deposition of a witness in an individual capacity, on basis that deposing party should have combined such a deposition with the 30(b)(6) deposition of the same person)

单词 “precipitation”、“deposition” 和 “sediment” 除了可以用来表达化学和地理中的 “沉淀，沉积” 这个概念，还在日常生活中有不同的用法。比如，天气预报就使用 “precipitation” 这个词来描述 “降水”。这些单词还有哪些常用的含义？听节目，学习这三个单词的用法。

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her sworn deposition from 2016 (unsealed in 2020), Virginia Giuffre detailed how Ghislaine Maxwell recruited, groomed, and trafficked her into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation starting when she was 16. She testified that Maxwell approached her at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 under the pretense of offering her work as a masseuse for a wealthy benefactor. That “job” quickly evolved into sexual abuse. According to Giuffre, Maxwell took an active role in teaching her how to sexually service Epstein, including hands-on “training” sessions involving Maxwell herself. She stated that Maxwell instructed her to recruit other underage girls and was fully aware — and involved — in the trafficking scheme. Maxwell not only facilitated the abuse, Giuffre claimed, but also participated in it, organizing flights, outfits, and sex schedules for Epstein and his associates.Giuffre's deposition also included accusations that she was trafficked to powerful men at Maxwell's direction. She named Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, and Glenn Dubin among the men she was forced to have sex with — often in Epstein's residences or on his private jet, the “Lolita Express.” Giuffre detailed incidents of sexual abuse at Epstein's private island (Little St. James), in Maxwell's London townhouse, and at Epstein's New York and Palm Beach homes. She described Maxwell's role as operational: coordinating travel, preparing the girls, dictating what to wear (often schoolgirl outfits), and ensuring silence through emotional manipulation and threats. Giuffre testified that Maxwell told her to be “grateful” and warned her that speaking out would have consequences — including death. Throughout the deposition, Giuffre emphasized that she was a minor being trafficked across state and international lines, and that Maxwell was not only aware but orchestrating every detail. Her statements were corroborated years later by other victims and led to Maxwell's 2021 conviction on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.to  contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:1090-32.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode of The Effective Lawyer, Zinda Law Group CEO and founder, Jack Zinda, answers your listener questions. Discussed in this Episode:Self-managing law firmReferral pipelineClient referrals & reviews Saying no to bad casesManaging cash flowFinancial mistakesStaying motivatedBiggest regretSelf-Managing Law Firm: How do you create a self-managing law firm when you feel like you have to be involved in everything?Break down your tasks: What do you like doing vs. what you don't?Hand off the stuff you hate: Slowly delegate to employees, part-timers, or contractors.Start small: Hire an admin if you hate e-filing and paying bills.Figure out your worth: Put a dollar value on your time to see if you're doing tasks someone else should.Referral Pipeline: How do you get more referrals from other attorneys?Set goals: How many referrals do you want? Where do they currently come from?Go where the people are: Social media, email, speaking gigs, networking events.Have a plan: Measure your success before the actual referral.Networking is key: Go to events, introduce yourself, and get cards.Follow up: Email people you meet, invite them for lunch, and keep their info.Be consistent: Do this regularly to build a network.Client Referrals & Reviews: How do you get past clients to refer and leave positive reviews?Do good work: Seriously, be a good lawyer.Care about clients: It makes a huge difference.Get personal: Learn about their life and bring it up in conversations.First-name basis: Makes things feel friendly.Appointments only: Focus on their case without distractions.Sell your work: Tell them everything you've done on their case.Consistent contact: One-business-day rule for responses, 30-day updates.Remind them you exist: Social media, emails, cards.Ask for referrals: Don't be shy!Saying No to Bad Cases: How to avoid cases that drain resources?Set your standards: What's a "good" vs "bad" case for your firm?Value threshold: Have a minimum value for cases you take.Client behavior: Don't tolerate violent or abusive clients.Be upfront: Explain your process and investigation stage from the start.Refer out or reject: If a case isn't worth it, refer it to another firm or decline.Please don't blame the client: Frame it as the circumstances, not them.Managing Cash Flow: How do you handle cash flow when waiting for big settlements?Plan for delays: Build cash reserves (at least 2 months of expenses).Case volume: Have enough cases so you're not relying on one big one.Don't count your chickens: Don't spend money until it's in hand.Be aggressive in getting funds: Track and follow up on settlements.Financial Mistakes: What are the biggest money mistakes made by personal injury law firms?Shady marketing: Be careful of expensive companies that don't deliver.Expensive rent: Don't overspend on office space too soon.Hiring issues: Don't hire/fire too quickly, and don't underpay/overpay.No budget: Have a budget and understand your finances.Staying Motivated: How do you stay motivated with stressful cases/clients?Exercise: It helps clear your head!Take breaks: Get out of the office, do something fun.Take care of yourself: Don't absorb too much stress.Client management: Have strategies for demanding clients (homework, associates).Biggest Regret: What would Jack Zinda change about building his law firm?Focus on bigger cases sooner.Better vetting of hires (he had some crazy stories about bad hires!).You can reach Jack at:jack@zindalaw.com512-246-2224

Zinda Law Group CEO and founder Jack Zinda teams up again with seasoned trial lawyer Max Massey to answer more of your top listener questions. This episode dives into key strategies for winning trials, building a successful law firm, and hiring the right legal talent. Whether you're a personal injury attorney, law firm owner, or aspiring trial lawyer, you'll find valuable, actionable insights in this episode.  Winning a Big Trial - The Little Things That Matter :  Deep case preparation strategies  Monthly case review best practices  Identifying and preparing key witnesses  Effectively presenting non-economic damages Credibility of Non-Economic Witnesses:  Build layered witness credibility  Vet and prepare non-economic witnesses  Anticipate challenges during cross-examination  Hiring the Right Law Student or New Attorney :  Communication and client connection skills  Grit, competitiveness, and problem-solving ability  Research and legal reasoning for new attorneys Identifying Candidates with the “It” Factor :  How to recognize persistence and initiative  What to look for in cover letters and resumes  The importance of a strong work ethic  Scaling a Law Firm: From Solo to Success :  Building a financial and cash flow plan  Smart, strategic hiring decisions  Tracking key law firm metrics for growth  Work-Life Balance for Law Firm Leaders :  Time management and delegation strategies  Protecting your calendar with key meetings  Avoiding diminishing returns through work-life balance  Starting Your Own Law Firm: The “Why” and the How: Defining your motivation and vision  Building a solid financial and operational plan  Marketing and client acquisition strategies  

In today's episode we learn a bit more about the court battle between Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell over documents that pertain to the case.Maxwell is arguing that they should stay sealed to prevent harm and embarrassment to the powerful people who are contained within.Virginia Roberts attorneys argue that the public deserves to know who is named.What will the Judge decide?Join me as I take a look.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ghislaine-maxwell-argues-it-would-be-too-difficult-to-release-full-epstein-files/amp/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTube

In this episode, Chef Stu is joined by Zack Peter as they explore topics from celebrity gossip to culinary critiques.They critique Meghan Markle's cooking show, discussing its authenticity and staged moments that feel more commercial than genuine. The duo then dives into the legal drama surrounding Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, speculating on the implications of potential depositions from celebrities like Taylor Swift. They wrap up with quirky trends, including the bizarre act of eating packing peanuts, and a humorous take on a baffling dessert. Chef Stu Social - send your questions for “Kitchen Quick Fix” Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chefstuartokeeffe/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/chefstuartokeeffe Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/chefstuartokeeffe TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@chefstuart?lang=en Chef Stu's Cookbooks & Seasoning: Quick Six Fix - https://amzn.to/49zVeB0 Cook It, Spill It, Throw It: The Not-So-Real Housewives Parody Cookbook - https://amzn.to/49A8UMi Chef Stu Lovely Seasonings - https://chefstuart.com This is another Hurrdat Media Production. Hurrdat Media is a podcast network and digital media production company based in Omaha, NE. Find more podcasts on the Hurrdat Media Network by going to HurrdatMedia.com or the Hurrdat Media YouTube channel! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Our roundup episodes summarize brand-new, deposition-related court rulings from around the country. We cover four new rulings in this episode on crucial issues:You can successfully oppose even otherwise taxable deposition costs, when an adversary prevails, by making these fairness-based argumentsFRCP 30(b)(6) topic lists must be proportionate to the case, as a court ruled when refusing to evaluate a list of 503 topicsThe rule of sequestration does not apply in federal civil cases and the majority of states, but you may succeed in getting a court to impose it if you can show one of these "plus" factorsIn-person depositions are still a thing, and should not be treated as unusual or requiring an extraordinary showingAs always, thanks for listening! And remember - these episodes are always free and contain no advertising. What's the catch? Only that we'd ask you to leave us a 5-star rating wherever you download your podcasts. Those ratings are deeply motivating to, and deeply appreciated by, our research and production staff. And be sure to check out the book on which this podcast is based - 10,000 Depositions Later: The Premier Litigation Guide for Superior Deposition Practice. Now in its 4th edition at 625 pages, available on Amazon and almost everywhere books are sold.SHOW NOTESLUV N' CARE v. LINDSEY LAURAIN, ET AL, No. CV 3:16-00777, 2025 WL 622334, at *8 (W.D. La. Feb. 26, 2025) (while courts cannot award costs not explicitly identified in 28 U.S.C. § 1920, courts do have discretion to deny award of otherwise recoverable costs where fairness or other considerations dictate)NATHEN W. BARTON, Plaintiff, v. REAL INNOVATION INC. et al., Defendant., No. 3:24-CV-05194-DGE, 2025 WL 606167, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 25, 2025) See 36-page notice (Case 3:24-cv-05194-DGE Document 51-1 Filed 01/14/25 Page 1 of 36 (contains 503 actual questions, not topics)MARK WRIGHT-AHERN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF CLERMONT, Defendant., No. 5:24-CV-173-MMH-PRL, 2025 WL 605059, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 25, 2025) (rule of sequestration does not apply to depositions, absent particularized showing of specific facts warranting the relief; the correct procedure for seeking to exclude a person from deposition is to seek a protective order); see also Order (from same case, awarding fees and explaining sequestration concept in depositions), CM/ECF Document No. 31, filed Jan. 31, 2025)UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. The M/Y Amadea, a Motor Yacht Bearing Int'l Mar. Org. No. 1012531, Defendant., No. 23 CIV. 9304 (DEH), 2025 WL 754124, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025) (ordering witness to travel overseas to United States for in-person deposition, finding that while remote depositions are the new normal, there remains nothing unusual about insisting that a key witness appear in person)

In this episode of The Effective Lawyer, Jack Zinda dives into three key topics that impact law firm growth, efficiency, and leadership. Host Jack Zinda answers listener questions on the best books for personal and professional development, the role of AI in modern law practice, and what "superpower" sets successful law firms apart. Packed with insights from years of experience, this episode offers practical takeaways for lawyers looking to scale their firms and sharpen their skills.  Discussed in This Episode: Essential Books & Learning Resources for Lawyers The E-Myth by Michael Gerber – A foundational book for understanding law firm management and scaling. The Effective Executive by Peter Drucker – Key insights on productivity and decision-making. The 4-Hour Workweek by Tim Ferriss – Practical strategies on delegation and efficiency. Getting Things Done by David Allen – A framework for reducing stress and improving task management. David Ball on Damages – Trial strategy essentials. Ongoing CLEs and jurisdiction-specific training to stay ahead in legal practice. The importance of always reading a business book, an advocacy book, and a tactical resource to continuously improve. AI & Legal Tech: Streamlining Law Firm Operations The evolving role of AI in intake, case management, and marketing. Experimenting with AI-driven case summarization for improved efficiency. Using AI for content generation, legal research, and internal workflow automation. Best practices for AI integration, including compliance with ethical and data privacy regulations. Encouraging team-wide AI adoption to boost productivity and leverage emerging technologies. What Is a Law Firm's Superpower? The defining trait is empathy – The ability to deeply understand clients, opponents, and decision-makers. Understanding the real-life impact of injuries on clients beyond just legal damages. Empathizing with insurance adjusters and defense attorneys to negotiate more effectively. Recognizing what motivates judges and tailoring trial strategies accordingly. The power of emotional intelligence in case strategy, client relations, and firm culture.  Connect with Us: Have a question for Jack? jack@zindalaw.com 512-246-2224 

3-10-25 Afternoon Rush - Blake Lively Deposition Dates Announced & Stocks Tumble Big! & Bachelor Women Tell All Preview Today's episode is sponsored by: Try VIIA https://bit.ly/viiarushhour and use code [RUSHHOUR]! RO Body ro.co/rushhour to see if you qualify! Green Chef www.greenchef.com/rushhourfree for 50% off your first boxgo to patreon.com/daveneal for more bonus content!

In this episode, Jim Garrity spotlights a new ruling on a little-known but powerful tool: the use of depositions as affidavits. As Garrity discusses, a deposition does not need to meet the requirements of trial-oriented Fed. R. Civ. P. 32 (which requires a showing that the party against whom the deposition is offered had notice and a chance to examine the deposition) when it is offered in proceedings that allow testimony by affidavit, such as at summary judgment.SHOW NOTESSurety v. Co. v. Dwight A. Herald, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00086-GNS-HBB, 2025 WL 627523 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 26, 2025) (deposition/examination under oath of witness taken in underlying state-court personal injury could be used in federal declaratory judgment actions at summary judgment time, as deposition meets form of affidavit)Diamonds Plus, Inc. v. Kolber, et al., 960 F. 2d 765 (8th Cir. 1992) (deposition need not be admissible at trial to be properly considered in opposition to motions for summary judgment; deposition inadmissible at trial because one of the defendants did not receive proper notice and did not attend the deposition was properly used to create issues of fact justifying denial of summary judgment)Hoover v. Switlik Parachute Co., 663 F.2d 964, 966-67 (9th Cir. 1981) (“Rule 56 ... plainly allows consideration of “affidavits” and we find nothing which requires that term to be construed within the limitations of Rule 32(a).”).First Gaston Bank of North Carolina v. City of Hickory, 691 S.E.2d 715 (Ct. App. N.C. 2010) (citing cases rejecting proposition that FRCP 32 limits use of depositions in proceedings where evidence in affidavit form is admissible; pointing out that to the extent a party objects that they didn't have an opportunity to cross-examine a witness whose deposition from some other cases being offered, “the same objection can frequently be made as to affidavits filed in connection with motions for summary judgment”)Tingey v. Radionics, 193 F. App'x 747, 765–66 (10th Cir. 2006) (reversing summary judgment where trial court, relying on FRCP 32, excluded from consideration in opposition to summary judgment a deposition that plaintiff took of physician in separate state proceeding, where defendant was not party to that proceeding and had not been given notice of deposition; depositions can be used as affidavits in proceedings where affidavits are admissible; to illustrate, “[p]arties may file affidavits in support of summary judgment without providing notice or an opportunity to cross-examine the affiant. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The “remedy” for this non-confronted affidavit testimony is to file an opposing affidavit, not to complain that one was not present and permitted to cross-examine when the affidavit was signed. For this reason, the Ninth Circuit has permitted a party to introduce deposition testimony for summary judgment purposes against a party who was not present at the deposition, by construing the deposition as an affidavit. Hoover v. Switlik Parachute Co., 663 F.2d 964, 966–67 (9th Cir.1981)”)Nippon Credit Bank, Ltd. v. Matthews, 291 F.3d 738, 751 (11th Cir. 2002) (without analyzing scope and extent of application of FRCP 32, court broadly said that “Depositions are generally admissible provided that the party against whom they are admitted was present, represented, or reasonably noticed, Fed.R.Civ.P. 32(a), and are specifically allowed in consideration of summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A deposition taken in a different proceeding is admissible if the party against whom it is offered was provided with an opportunity to examine the deponent. Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(1).”)Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(A) (explicitly allowing citation to depositions for or against summary judgment)8 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2142 (1970))) (as are at least as good as affidavits and should be usable whenever an affidavit would be permissible, even where the conditions or requirements for use at trial under rule 32 are not met) 

SummaryIn part two of this Q&A series, Zinda Law Group CEO and founder Jack Zinda answers your questions about trial vs. Settlement, budgeting & legal myths.Discussed in this Episode:Trial vs. settlement strategyBudgeting for growthBiggest legal mythTrial vs. Settlement Strategy“How do you decide when to push for trial versus taking a strong settlement offer?” -  Most offers never leave the table, so don't be afraid that the money will be reduced if you choose to go to trial. Be realistic and ask yourself if the initial offer is as much or more than a jury would award to your client. Would that amount of money make a meaningful difference in your client's life? If going to trial is something the client wants, make sure to explain the risks involved and additional case expenses that can be incurred. Budgeting for Growth“What percentage of my revenue should be reinvested into marketing and operations?”  - “First, you have to know where you're going if you're going to get there.” Jack lays out how Zinda Law makes marketing decisions and how you can decide what's best for you. If you're unsure how to make the numbers work, don't hesitate to ask someone or hire a professional to lay the map out for you. Biggest Legal Myth“What's the biggest misconception people have about personal injury law?”  - “What we do is easy.” If it were easy, everyone would do it. That's what makes personal injury lawyers so important. “What does working with clients in a personal injury case mean?” Jack talks about psychodramas and their importance to understanding the complexities of your client's life. “How much money do personal injury lawyers make?” Just because you see large numbers on billboards doesn't mean that that money gets paid out. A plaintiff lawyer can get a large verdict, but no actual dollar value is exchanged if the defendant can't pay it. You can reach Jack at:jack@zindalaw.com512-246-2224

In October 2023, during a deposition related to a civil lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents, Christopher Laundrie recounted a distressing phone call from his son, Brian Laundrie, on August 29, 2021. In this call, Brian, sounding "very panicked," informed his father that "Gabby's gone" and requested assistance in obtaining a lawyer. Christopher noted that Brian was "very nervous and very scattered" during the conversation. Despite the alarming nature of the call, Christopher claimed he did not understand the implication that Gabby Petito was deceased. Following this conversation, the Laundries contacted their attorney, Steven Bertolino, and sent him $25,000 to retain a Wyoming-based lawyer for Brian. Roberta Laundrie, Brian's mother, mentioned in her deposition that she refrained from asking her son about Gabby's whereabouts, adhering to their attorney's advice. The Laundries did not reach out to Gabby's family or authorities after learning she was "gone," leading to allegations that they withheld critical information during the search for Gabby Petito.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Gabby Petito lawsuit: Read the parents' depositions here | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2023, during a deposition related to a civil lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents, Christopher Laundrie recounted a distressing phone call from his son, Brian Laundrie, on August 29, 2021. In this call, Brian, sounding "very panicked," informed his father that "Gabby's gone" and requested assistance in obtaining a lawyer. Christopher noted that Brian was "very nervous and very scattered" during the conversation. Despite the alarming nature of the call, Christopher claimed he did not understand the implication that Gabby Petito was deceased. Following this conversation, the Laundries contacted their attorney, Steven Bertolino, and sent him $25,000 to retain a Wyoming-based lawyer for Brian. Roberta Laundrie, Brian's mother, mentioned in her deposition that she refrained from asking her son about Gabby's whereabouts, adhering to their attorney's advice. The Laundries did not reach out to Gabby's family or authorities after learning she was "gone," leading to allegations that they withheld critical information during the search for Gabby Petito.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Gabby Petito lawsuit: Read the parents' depositions here | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2023, during a deposition related to a civil lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents, Christopher Laundrie recounted a distressing phone call from his son, Brian Laundrie, on August 29, 2021. In this call, Brian, sounding "very panicked," informed his father that "Gabby's gone" and requested assistance in obtaining a lawyer. Christopher noted that Brian was "very nervous and very scattered" during the conversation. Despite the alarming nature of the call, Christopher claimed he did not understand the implication that Gabby Petito was deceased. Following this conversation, the Laundries contacted their attorney, Steven Bertolino, and sent him $25,000 to retain a Wyoming-based lawyer for Brian. Roberta Laundrie, Brian's mother, mentioned in her deposition that she refrained from asking her son about Gabby's whereabouts, adhering to their attorney's advice. The Laundries did not reach out to Gabby's family or authorities after learning she was "gone," leading to allegations that they withheld critical information during the search for Gabby Petito.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Gabby Petito lawsuit: Read the parents' depositions here | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A new podcast today, Crash Connell is the host with guest Scott Schara (Grace's Dad) and a rare appearance by Jess, Grace's big sister, sharing her experience in the room with Grace. She also shares her experience with depositions and reviews three clips with the audience. Scott then reviews how we got to this point over the past 120 years by selling our birthright to the state. Finally, Scott discusses how to be prepared for a hospital stay. If you'd like to follow their story and advocacy work, please sign up for their newsletter at https://ouramazinggrace.substack.com/. You can also sign up to follow our landmark legal case at www.GraceSchara.com. For the inspiration behind the family's advocacy, please visit www.OurAmazingGrace.net. There you will find some fantastic pictures and videos of Grace, as well as resources and research. If you'd like to help with their work: https://www.givesendgo.com/theskysthelimit. Stand Up For The Truth Videos: https://rumble.com/user/CTRNOnline & https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgQQSvKiMcglId7oGc5c46A

The Heat can't finish... can Tyreek Hill? Might the leaked OF model deposition put Tyreek in the hot seat? Is he mature enough to focus on the Dolphins?! All this and more in hour one Thursday.

Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeWhat's up, #STSNation! Welcome to Surviving the Survivor—the podcast that brings you the very #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime. It's the small-town crime story gripping Kentucky—Sheriff Mickey Stines stands accused of murdering Judge Kevin Mullins, and now a deposition he gave just days before the killing has been unsealed. What does it reveal? Was this a cold-blooded execution, or something deeper? We're breaking it all down with our #BestGuests: Elizabeth Jones – Host of Hillbilly Crime General Mark Davidson – Active District Attorney for five rural Tennessee counties#SheriffMickeyStines #JudgeKevinMullins #LetcherCounty #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #Motive #Corruption #SmallTownCorruption #Kentucky #MurderMystery #RuralJustice #LegalDrama #SurvivingTheSurvivor

In part one of a three episode series, Zinda Law Group CEO and founder, Jack Zinda answers your questions about managing your law firm. Discussed in this Episode:Scaling a firmFirm CultureLeadership skillsScaling a Firm“I've hit a plateau with my firm's growth. What strategies do you recommend to scale beyond the 7-figure mark?” -  The first question you need to ask yourself is “what number am I trying to get to? There are dozens of ways to scale a law firm but if you don't have a firm number or end goal, you won't be able to build a map to get there. Firm Culture“How do I build a culture where my team is as invested in the firm's success as I am?” - The short answer is: you can't. No one will be as invested as the founder and that is because of a myriad of reasons including the financial commitments and pressures to succeed. That being said, there are still ways to improve the level to which your team cares. Some questions to ask yourself are: What is it about your firm that makes you special? Do your employees enjoy their work? What are their struggles? Jack's final word of advice: “Don't have jerks at your company”.Leadership Skills“What's the #1 leadership skill that helped you grow your firm?” - Learning to communicate complicated messages in a simple way is the most effective way to keep your team motivated and moving forward. Before you can even do that you need to go back to the beginning and make sure that you have your map laid out and ready to be communicated. Resources:The E-Myth by Michael E. GerberYou can reach Jack at:jack@zindalaw.com512-246-2224

Justin Baldoni’s legal battle with Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds just took a shocking turn—now, Taylor Swiftcould be dragged into the drama! The former Victoria’s Secret Angel has given birth to her third child—her first with jiu-jitsu instructor boyfriend Joaquim Valente. The Duchess of Sussex, 43, took to Instagram to show off a black Club Chainstitch sweatshirt embroidered with “Archie & Lili” in delicate white cursive along the collar. Rob is joined by the charming Marc Lupo. Don't forget to vote in today's poll on Twitter at @naughtynicerob or in our Facebook group. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell sat down with Mica Francis' divorce attorney Regina Ward of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, to talk about Mica's case and the dozens of lawsuits JP Miller has now filed against protesters and content creators. In the interview, Regina talked about Mica's request for a restraining order against JP and why it was dismissed — PLUS she revealed that at the time of Mica's death Mica was awaiting her second restraining order hearing to stop JP from allegedly harassing and stalking her. Also on the show, Regina discussed her newest case … representing former Solid Rock Ministries church member Sam Rickman in his countersuit against JP.  Last week, Regina filed an EXPLOSIVE response to one of the dozens of lawsuits now filed by JP and his cohorts. In his typical chaotic way, JP Miller has opened a Pandora's Box and he's not going to like what awaits him in court…  Premium Members get additional discussions on the inadequate support for domestic violence victims in Horry County, South Carolina, highlighting the defunct Casa organization and the insufficient funding for a new shelter despite abundant resources allocated elsewhere. We'll also pivot to the legal strategies deployed by Regina in Rickman's defense and counterclaim, specifically in magistrate court, to challenge the pastor's claims of financial damages and the questionable evidence presented. Regina is bringing a full bore legal battle exposing the pastor's potentially frivolous lawsuits, emphasizing the importance of proper evidence and procedure within the legal system... JP is in for a rude awakening. ☕ Cup's Up! ⚖️ Learn More About Attorney Regina Ward Here: @lawfirmofreginabward attorneyreginaward.com facebook.com/lawfirmofreginabward Episode Resources Magistrate Court Restraining Order Info from SCVAN Petition for Order of Protection in SC Family Court Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) “What is Coercive Control?” - Laura Richards Premium Resources JP Miller's Invasion of Privacy Suit Against Sam Rickman - Jan 10, 2025 Sam Rickman's Countersuit Against JP Miller - Jan 27, 2025 Notice of Deposition for JP Miller - Jan 27, 2025 Horry County PD's Investigation into Theft Reports for Dare2Care Bank Accounts - March 2024 Mica Francis' Restraining Order Complaint Against JP Miller - March 11, 2024 Stay Tuned, Stay Pesky and Stay in the Sunlight...☀️ Premium Members also get access to episode videos, case files, live trial coverage and exclusive live experiences with our hosts. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. Check out Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ What We're Buying... Boll & Branch Sheets - http://bollandbranch.com/mandy Change the way you sleep with Boll & Branch. Get 15% off, plus free shipping on your first set of sheets. Here's a link to some of our favorite things: https://amzn.to/4cJ0eVn Find us on social media: bsky.app/profile/mandy-matney.com   |   bsky.app/profile/elizfarrell.com  Twitter.com/mandymatney | Twitter.com/elizfarrell https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ |  https://www.instagram.com/cojpod/ YouTube  | TIKTOK SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBM *** Alert: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! *** Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices