Podcasts about Virgin Islands

The U.S. Virgin Islands formally ended its civil racketeering (CICO) lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate in late 2022 after reaching a $105 million settlement, marking the close of one of the most aggressive legal efforts to hold his operation accountable. The lawsuit had accused Epstein's estate of operating a criminal enterprise under the federal RICO framework—alleging that his private island, Little St. James, was used as a hub for sex trafficking, coercion, and the movement of victims across international lines. The territory's Attorney General's Office argued that Epstein's vast web of shell companies and real estate holdings were tools to facilitate and conceal illegal activity, effectively turning the U.S. Virgin Islands into the epicenter of his trafficking operation. By ending the case, the territory secured both financial restitution and the right to pursue claims against co-conspirators and associated entities.While the settlement concluded the direct case against the Epstein estate, it left open the possibility of continued investigations into those who helped enable his crimes within the islands' jurisdiction. The deal required the estate to sell Epstein's island properties and distribute funds to survivors, with part of the proceeds going to local anti-trafficking initiatives. In public statements, the U.S. Virgin Islands government characterized the resolution as a “victory for justice,” though critics noted that it avoided full discovery and depositions that might have exposed more about Epstein's powerful network. The case's conclusion symbolized a pragmatic end to litigation—but also reinforced a lingering frustration: even in death, Epstein managed to settle before the full truth ever reached open court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In This Episode: Weer'd, Erin, Oddball, Xander and David all sit down for some holiday gifts and merriment before discussing some relevant Second Amendment news. Did you know that we have a Patreon? Join now for the low, low cost of $4/month (that's $1/podcast) and you'll get to listen to our podcast on Friday instead of Mondays, as well as patron-only content like mag dump episodes, our hilarious blooper reels and film tracks. Show Notes Purple Isn't Real Pro-Knot Outdoor Knots - Portable Waterproof Knot Book Magpul MS4 Dual QD Sling GEN2 Atwood Rope MFG Parapocalypse Paracord What we know about Ahmed al-Ahmed, the Bondi Beach bystander who disarmed gunman DOJ Sues DC Over AR-15 Ban DOJ sues U.S. Virgin Islands over lack of gun rights, but there's a catch  

Welcome back to Business Christmas! This week, we're tackling the Lifetime Christmas movie Single and Ready to Jingle (sometimes also known as Destination Christmas). In this movie, busy toy executive Emma's vacation plans go awry when she mistakenly winds up in St. John, Alaska, instead of her intended destination: Saint John, U.S. Virgin Islands. But things are soon looking up when Emma connects with a local man, Connor, with a surprising secret. Join us as Emma learns what we've all come to know: that Christmas is more important than business.

The government of the U.S. Virgin Islands alleged in court filings that Jamie Dimon, as chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, knew—or should have known—about Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking activities while the bank maintained Epstein as a client. The USVI's complaint argued that Epstein's conduct was not hidden from view, citing internal bank communications, compliance warnings, and the volume and nature of transactions that allegedly raised red flags over many years. Prosecutors contended that senior leadership was repeatedly put on notice about Epstein's reputation and risks, and that the bank nonetheless continued the relationship, providing services that enabled Epstein's operations.The allegations framed Dimon's knowledge as part of a broader institutional failure rather than a single lapse, asserting that information about Epstein circulated within JPMorgan at multiple levels, including among executives responsible for risk and compliance. While Dimon and the bank denied the claims—maintaining that Dimon had no direct awareness of Epstein's crimes at the time—the USVI argued that the evidence showed a sustained pattern of warnings ignored or minimized. The dispute became central to the territory's civil case against the bank, sharpening questions about executive accountability and whether Epstein's abuse could have been curtailed had financial institutions acted sooner on what they allegedly knew.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew was not covered by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007–2008 federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), a point that has repeatedly been misunderstood or deliberately obscured. Legal experts have emphasized that the NPA applied narrowly to Epstein himself and, at most, to unnamed U.S.-based co-conspirators under specific jurisdictional limits tied to the Southern District of Florida. Prince Andrew, a British national with alleged conduct occurring outside that jurisdiction—including in the United Kingdom, New York, and the U.S. Virgin Islands—fell entirely outside the agreement's scope. Courts later made clear that the NPA did not grant immunity to foreign nationals, did not bind other federal districts, and did not preempt civil or criminal exposure beyond the deal's precise terms.That legal reality became especially clear during Virginia Giuffre's civil case against Prince Andrew, where judges rejected arguments that Epstein's plea deal insulated Andrew from liability. The settlement Andrew ultimately reached was not a function of legal protection under the NPA, but rather a strategic move to avoid sworn testimony, discovery, and the risk of trial. Attorneys and legal analysts have noted that Andrew's long period of effective insulation stemmed from political deference, diplomatic sensitivity, and institutional hesitation—not from any binding legal shield in Epstein's agreement. In short, Andrew was never legally protected by the Epstein NPA; he was protected by silence, delay, and power, none of which carried the force of law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands formally ended its civil racketeering (CICO) lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate in late 2022 after reaching a $105 million settlement, marking the close of one of the most aggressive legal efforts to hold his operation accountable. The lawsuit had accused Epstein's estate of operating a criminal enterprise under the federal RICO framework—alleging that his private island, Little St. James, was used as a hub for sex trafficking, coercion, and the movement of victims across international lines. The territory's Attorney General's Office argued that Epstein's vast web of shell companies and real estate holdings were tools to facilitate and conceal illegal activity, effectively turning the U.S. Virgin Islands into the epicenter of his trafficking operation. By ending the case, the territory secured both financial restitution and the right to pursue claims against co-conspirators and associated entities.While the settlement concluded the direct case against the Epstein estate, it left open the possibility of continued investigations into those who helped enable his crimes within the islands' jurisdiction. The deal required the estate to sell Epstein's island properties and distribute funds to survivors, with part of the proceeds going to local anti-trafficking initiatives. In public statements, the U.S. Virgin Islands government characterized the resolution as a “victory for justice,” though critics noted that it avoided full discovery and depositions that might have exposed more about Epstein's powerful network. The case's conclusion symbolized a pragmatic end to litigation—but also reinforced a lingering frustration: even in death, Epstein managed to settle before the full truth ever reached open court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comThe U.S. Virgin Islands formally ended its civil racketeering (CICO) lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate in late 2022 after reaching a $105 million settlement, marking the close of one of the most aggressive legal efforts to hold his operation accountable. The lawsuit had accused Epstein's estate of operating a criminal enterprise under the federal RICO framework—alleging that his private island, Little St. James, was used as a hub for sex trafficking, coercion, and the movement of victims across international lines. The territory's Attorney General's Office argued that Epstein's vast web of shell companies and real estate holdings were tools to facilitate and conceal illegal activity, effectively turning the U.S. Virgin Islands into the epicenter of his trafficking operation. By ending the case, the territory secured both financial restitution and the right to pursue claims against co-conspirators and associated entities.While the settlement concluded the direct case against the Epstein estate, it left open the possibility of continued investigations into those who helped enable his crimes within the islands' jurisdiction. The deal required the estate to sell Epstein's island properties and distribute funds to survivors, with part of the proceeds going to local anti-trafficking initiatives. In public statements, the U.S. Virgin Islands government characterized the resolution as a “victory for justice,” though critics noted that it avoided full discovery and depositions that might have exposed more about Epstein's powerful network. The case's conclusion symbolized a pragmatic end to litigation—but also reinforced a lingering frustration: even in death, Epstein managed to settle before the full truth ever reached open court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In 2023, The New York Times filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority after the agency refused to release records related to Jeffrey Epstein and the substantial tax benefits he received while living in the territory. The Times sought documents detailing Epstein's participation in the USVI's Economic Development Commission program, which granted him sweeping tax exemptions and incentives for years, even after serious allegations about his conduct were known. The lawsuit argued that the EDA improperly withheld public records that could shed light on how Epstein was vetted, approved, and allowed to retain those benefits.The legal action highlighted broader questions about government transparency and accountability in the Virgin Islands, where officials have faced criticism for enabling Epstein's financial operations while failing to intervene in his criminal behavior. The EDA contended that some records were protected by confidentiality provisions, but the Times countered that public interest outweighed those claims, particularly given Epstein's role in one of the most significant sex-trafficking scandals in modern history. The lawsuit became part of a wider effort by journalists and investigators to uncover how Epstein leveraged government programs and institutional secrecy to protect his wealth—and how local authorities handled warnings that, in hindsight, should have triggered far greater scrutiny.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sara hosts alongside Tim, while we welcome: Tamara - Support your local library Nisi - If you are a business owner, look into federal bonds to help reintegrate people to society Erin - Be Kind To People Salena - Support People, Support Creatives, Support Local Businesses.  Cold Read/Hot Takes Podcast Sign up for the 3rd Annual Trivia Advent-ure Advent Calendar!  Head to https://triviaadventure.org/ to sign up today! Huge shout out to ArkAngelWulf for the graphics for our merchandise! Pick up some BRAND NEW MERCH with our new logos at HERE Enjoying the Show? Support us at www.patreon.com/ptebb Connect with us on Discord, Facebook, Twitter, IG, etc….at:  PTE Network | Links (ptepodcasts.com) Or contact us at frenemytrivia@gmail.com Wanna be on one of our shows? PTE Network | Appearance Request (ptepodcasts.com) Don't forget - Leave us a 5 Star Rating and write us a review and we'll see you next week for more Frenemy Trivia!    

In September 2023, a federal judge in Manhattan granted former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley permission to depose one of the unnamed Jeffrey Epstein accusers who had sued JPMorgan Chase & Co. alleging the bank benefited from Epstein's crimes. The ruling allowed Staley's legal team to question the woman—identified in filings only as Jane Doe—in person in the city where she lives, despite her previously expressed concerns about facing what her attorneys described as potentially intrusive questioning. This order came in the context of a broader settlement between JPMorgan and Epstein's victims, and situated within the ongoing pretrial litigation over the bank's liability and Staley's role in the bank's relationship with Epstein.The judge's decision followed arguments from Staley's lawyers that questioning the accuser was necessary to challenge key factual assertions about what she knew and when, which bear on claims against Staley personally in JPMorgan's third-party complaint. Staley's request was distinct from and in addition to his own scheduled deposition in the broader litigation involving the U.S. Virgin Islands and other plaintiffs, and the judge's order set logistical parameters for how that deposition of the accuser would be conducted before fact discovery closed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands formally ended its civil racketeering (CICO) lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate in late 2022 after reaching a $105 million settlement, marking the close of one of the most aggressive legal efforts to hold his operation accountable. The lawsuit had accused Epstein's estate of operating a criminal enterprise under the federal RICO framework—alleging that his private island, Little St. James, was used as a hub for sex trafficking, coercion, and the movement of victims across international lines. The territory's Attorney General's Office argued that Epstein's vast web of shell companies and real estate holdings were tools to facilitate and conceal illegal activity, effectively turning the U.S. Virgin Islands into the epicenter of his trafficking operation. By ending the case, the territory secured both financial restitution and the right to pursue claims against co-conspirators and associated entities.While the settlement concluded the direct case against the Epstein estate, it left open the possibility of continued investigations into those who helped enable his crimes within the islands' jurisdiction. The deal required the estate to sell Epstein's island properties and distribute funds to survivors, with part of the proceeds going to local anti-trafficking initiatives. In public statements, the U.S. Virgin Islands government characterized the resolution as a “victory for justice,” though critics noted that it avoided full discovery and depositions that might have exposed more about Epstein's powerful network. The case's conclusion symbolized a pragmatic end to litigation—but also reinforced a lingering frustration: even in death, Epstein managed to settle before the full truth ever reached open court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In September 2023, a federal judge in Manhattan granted former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley permission to depose one of the unnamed Jeffrey Epstein accusers who had sued JPMorgan Chase & Co. alleging the bank benefited from Epstein's crimes. The ruling allowed Staley's legal team to question the woman—identified in filings only as Jane Doe—in person in the city where she lives, despite her previously expressed concerns about facing what her attorneys described as potentially intrusive questioning. This order came in the context of a broader settlement between JPMorgan and Epstein's victims, and situated within the ongoing pretrial litigation over the bank's liability and Staley's role in the bank's relationship with Epstein.The judge's decision followed arguments from Staley's lawyers that questioning the accuser was necessary to challenge key factual assertions about what she knew and when, which bear on claims against Staley personally in JPMorgan's third-party complaint. Staley's request was distinct from and in addition to his own scheduled deposition in the broader litigation involving the U.S. Virgin Islands and other plaintiffs, and the judge's order set logistical parameters for how that deposition of the accuser would be conducted before fact discovery closed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Retired FBI agent Michael Clarke and retired DEA agent Jack McFarland review their 2004 joint FBI and DEA investigation of "The Commission," a violent criminal gang operating in the U.S. Virgin Islands which includes St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix, whose members were convicted in federal court for racketeering, murder, and drug trafficking. The case was conducted under the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) program, the Safe Streets Task Force initiative, and the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program. Mike and Jack both served as agents for 32 years.    Check out episode show notes, photos, and related articles: https://jerriwilliams.com/382-michael-clarke-and-jack-mcfarland-disrupting-the-commission-us-virgin-islands/     Join my Reader Team to get the FBI Reading Resource - Books about the FBI, written by FBI agents, the 20 clichés about the FBI Reality Checklist, and keep up to date on the FBI in books, TV, and movies via my monthly email. Join here. http://eepurl.com/dzCCmL  Buy me a coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/JerriWilliams   Check out my FBI books, non-fiction and crime fiction, available as audiobooks, ebooks and paperbacks wherever books are sold. https://jerriwilliams.com/books/

Send us a text message and tell us your thoughts.Celebrate the holidays with us with a throwback episode as we open a window onto a season where streets become stages, kitchens turn into archives, and every drumbeat and carol carries a story. From the clatter of cowbells in Nassau to the smoky crackle of a roast pig on Christmas Eve, the region's holidays reveal how history lives in sound, taste, and togetherness. We start with the pulse of festival culture: Junkanoo's lavish costumes and goatskin drums marching down Bay Street in the Bahamas, and the Boxing Day launches in the U.S. Virgin Islands, St. Kitts and Nevis, Belize, and Montserrat. Each celebration stitches heritage to the present—months of planning, bursts of creativity, and a shared promise to meet at dawn. Then we head to St. Vincent and the Grenadines, where Nine Mornings wakes neighborhoods at 4 a.m. with concerts and games, culminating in a joyful jump up that proves community thrives when people gather before sunrise.Our journey continues into homes and churches. In Suriname, Godo Pa—Dearest Daddy—arrives on December 6 with gifts and poems, a post-independence figure who replaces Old World icons with a reflection of local identity. Across the Spanish Caribbean, Noche Buena brings families to the table for lechón, yuca, and music that lasts late into Christmas Eve, while Three Kings Day keeps the season open into January as children leave grass and water for the camels and wake to gifts beneath the bed. These customs hold the region's layered past while nurturing the joy that keeps people close. No Caribbean holiday is complete without music. Parang bands roam neighborhoods in Grenada, and parang-soca lights up Trinidad and Tobago with door-to-door harmonies. We share favorites—from Scrunter's Christmas classics and Bindley B's celebratory anthems to Carlene Davis's reggae carols—curating a playlist that can transform a winter commute into a warm-weather fête. By the end, you'll hear how a festival becomes a bridge, how a song becomes a keepsake, and how a meal becomes a map back home.Press play, share your family tradition, and tell us the holiday song you return to every year. If this tour of Caribbean celebrations moved you, follow, rate, and leave a review to help others find the show.Support the showConnect with Strictly Facts - Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube | Website Looking to read more about the topics covered in this episode? Subscribe to the newsletter at www.strictlyfactspod.com to get the Strictly Facts Syllabus to your email!Want to Support Strictly Facts? Rate & Leave a Review on your favorite platform Share this episode with someone or online and tag us Send us a DM or voice note to have your thoughts featured on an upcoming episode Donate to help us continue empowering listeners with Caribbean history and education Produced by Breadfruit Media

Assistant AG and head of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon joins Cam to discuss the Second Amendment Section's new lawsuits taking on D.C.'s "assault weapon" ban and the U.S. Virgin Islands' draconian gun storage scheme and licensing delays.

On this 2A Tuesday segment, Mark Walters from Armed American Radio discusses ongoing Second Amendment issues, including the DOJ suing Washington D.C. over delays in registering firearms and efforts to uphold gun rights in blue states. Walters emphasizes the importance of compliance with Supreme Court decisions and highlights cases like the Virgin Islands' gun restrictions. He also shares practical advice for travelers carrying firearms, warning against mixing range bags and travel luggage to avoid hefty fines or legal trouble, drawing on personal and anecdotal examples. The segment underscores both the legal and practical challenges faced by gun owners nationwide.

Hour 3 covers a mix of holiday reflections, expert commentary on Second Amendment rights, and a heated discussion on student behavior. The hour opens with Mark Cox talking about the holiday rush and Costco chaos, then features Todd Piro sharing insights on year-end reflections and personal anecdotes. The spotlight moves to 2A Tuesday with Mark Walters, discussing ongoing legal battles over gun rights in DC, the Virgin Islands, and travel-related firearm mishaps. The hour closes with a deep dive into a Pennsylvania bus controversy, exploring the challenges of disciplining bilingual students and the limits of school and bus policies.

In this episode, the hosts break down a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to own a floating pizza restaurant in the Virgin Islands—complete with a pizza armada, liquor license, and serious island vibes—all priced at under 1x earnings.Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

In this episode, the hosts break down a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to own a floating pizza restaurant in the Virgin Islands—complete with a pizza armada, liquor license, and serious island vibes—all priced at under 1x earnings.Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

The news to know for Thursday, December 18, 2025! What to know about President Trump's primetime address to the nation last night—how he rates his first year back in office, and why some say it was the wrong message. Also, why the U.S. is now suing the U.S. Virgin Islands, who is donating to the so-called Trump Accounts this time, and what a new version of history at the White House shows. Plus: what it could mean now that federal funding has been cut to the American Academy of Pediatrics, why the Academy Awards will look very different in a few years, and how music can be like food for your brain. Those stories and even more news to know in about 10 minutes!    Join us every Mon-Fri for more daily news roundups!  See sources: https://www.theNewsWorthy.com/shownotes Become an INSIDER to get AD-FREE episodes here: https://www.theNewsWorthy.com/insider Get The NewsWorthy MERCH here: https://thenewsworthy.dashery.com/ Sponsors: You can get an additional 15% off their 90-day subscription Starter Kit by going to fatty15.com/NEWSWORTHY and using code NEWSWORTHY at checkout. Get 15% off OneSkin with the code NEWSWORTHY at https://www.oneskin.co/NEWSWORTHY #oneskinpod To advertise on our podcast, please reach out to ad-sales@libsyn.com

Jeffrey Epstein's crimes were global in scope, not confined to Palm Beach, Manhattan, or any single jurisdiction, despite early efforts to frame them as isolated local misconduct. Evidence from survivor testimony, flight records, property logs, and court filings shows a transnational pattern of abuse that spanned the United States, the Caribbean, Europe, and beyond. Epstein maintained residences in Florida, New York, New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Paris, each functioning as part of a broader infrastructure that enabled the recruitment, transport, and exploitation of underage girls. Victims described being trafficked across state and national lines, sometimes flown on private aircraft to meet Epstein and his associates, a hallmark of organized sex trafficking rather than opportunistic abuse.What makes the global nature of Epstein's crimes especially damning is how consistently institutions failed—or refused—to respond across borders. Financial systems moved money without meaningful scrutiny, immigration and customs processes posed no obstacle, and law enforcement agencies treated jurisdictional complexity as an excuse for inaction rather than a trigger for coordination. Epstein exploited the seams between countries, legal systems, and regulatory bodies, operating in spaces where accountability dissolved. The result was a decades-long international abuse network that thrived precisely because it was global, allowing Epstein to evade consequences while victims were silenced, displaced, and left without any single authority willing to claim responsibility for stopping him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan publicly accused the U.S. Virgin Islands government of enabling Jeffrey Epstein by turning a blind eye to his criminal conduct while benefiting financially from his presence on the islands. In court filings responding to the USVI's civil lawsuit against the bank, JP Morgan argued that local officials knew for years that Epstein was abusing underage girls at his Little St. James compound yet failed to act, despite repeated red flags. The bank pointed to Epstein's close relationship with former USVI Governor John de Jongh Jr., including letters of support, favorable tax treatment, and political access, arguing that this cozy relationship helped insulate Epstein from scrutiny. JP Morgan framed the territory not as a victim of Epstein's crimes, but as a willing participant that allowed him to operate freely in exchange for economic benefits.JP Morgan further claimed that the USVI actively facilitated Epstein's operations by failing to enforce its own laws, ignoring complaints, and allowing Epstein to maintain an airstrip, private security, and unrestricted travel despite widespread knowledge of his past criminal conduct. The bank alleged that if the USVI had intervened earlier—through law enforcement action, regulatory oversight, or even basic investigation—Epstein's abuse network could have been disrupted long before his 2019 arrest. By advancing this argument, JP Morgan sought to shift liability away from itself and onto the territory, painting the lawsuit as an attempt by the USVI to rewrite history and deflect from its own role in protecting Epstein. The accusation laid bare an uncomfortable reality of the Epstein saga: that multiple institutions, including governments, may have knowingly tolerated his crimes when it was financially or politically convenient to do so.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Denise George, during her tenure as Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, pushed aggressively to keep certain Epstein-related records sealed as she built a wide-ranging investigation into Epstein's criminal network and the financial infrastructure that supported it. Her position wasn't about protecting Epstein—it was about preserving the integrity of an active, highly sensitive investigation involving powerful institutions, international financial flows, and potential co-conspirators who had not yet been publicly named. George argued repeatedly in court filings that premature disclosure of subpoenas, deposition transcripts, banking records, and witness identities could alert targets, jeopardize evidence, and compromise ongoing law-enforcement efforts. She maintained that the scope of Epstein's activity in the USVI was deeper and more complex than previously understood, and that investigators needed the shield of sealed records to pursue leads without interference.At the same time, George's insistence on sealing certain documents reflected her awareness that the investigation threatened politically connected figures in the Virgin Islands and beyond. She sought to prevent leaks that could give advance warning to individuals who might destroy documents, move assets, or coordinate stories. Her critics accused her of being overly secretive, but George countered that the secrecy was temporary, legally justified, and essential to holding powerful actors accountable. Ironically, after she filed a sweeping lawsuit against JPMorgan alleging the bank knowingly enabled Epstein's trafficking operation, she was fired by the governor—an event that only amplified scrutiny of why the sealed records mattered and who might have been implicated. Her push to maintain strict confidentiality was ultimately part of a larger strategy: protect the investigation first, then reveal the truth once the evidence was secured.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate — Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn — filed a formal response opposing the U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General's emergency motion in the ongoing civil action against the estate. They described the government's request as “legally meritless” and urged the court not to grant the extraordinary relief sought, asserting that the Attorney General was trying to improperly interfere with their authority to manage the estate. The co-executors argued that the liens and restrictions the government placed on estate funds were invalid under Virgin Islands probate law and the territory's Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, claiming the Attorney General lacked the legal basis to freeze or control assets that the probate court had already put under their administration.They further contended that the government's actions were harming the estate's ability to preserve assets, pay ordinary bills, maintain property, defend ongoing litigation, and fund the victim compensation program that the co-executors had established. The response emphasized that the probate court — not the Attorney General's office — has primary jurisdiction over estate administration and that legitimate claims by victims will ultimately be addressed through that process. By arguing that the Attorney General's motion threatened to usurp the co-executors' fiduciary duties and disrupt orderly estate management, they sought to have the court reject the motion and keep control of Epstein's assets.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her deposition testimony linked to litigation around Jeffrey Epstein and related civil actions, Denise George revealed that top local officials, including Governor Albert Bryan Jr., had direct contact with requests tied to Epstein's legal status and privileges. Specifically, she testified that Governor Bryan personally informed her about a request from Epstein to waiver requirements attached to his sex-offender registration, highlighting how political leaders were involved in administrative interactions regarding Epstein's legal standing in the territory. This deposition testimony helped illuminate a broader picture of political engagement with Epstein's interests—not merely passive oversight but active communication that raised concerns about influence and preferential treatment of the disgraced financier.George's deposition also contributed to emerging scrutiny of how Virgin Islands officials handled waivers, tax breaks, and legal benefits tied to Epstein's presence. Reporting based on unsealed documents and testimony showed that Epstein's influence may have extended into legislative adjustments and executive considerations, suggesting that local powerholders were more deeply enmeshed in decisions affecting Epstein's legal and economic privileges than previously acknowledged. These revelations amplified questions about the territory's governance and oversight and fueled political controversy—especially after George was fired shortly after filing a high-profile lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase over its role in facilitating Epstein's financial operations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In its efforts to trace how Jeffrey Epstein's finances may have enabled or obscured his sex-trafficking operations, the U.S. Virgin Islands government has issued subpoenas and pursued information from multiple major financial institutions believed to have handled Epstein's accounts or related entities. Court filings and investigative reporting show that banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank were subpoenaed for records, transaction details, and internal communications about Epstein and the dozens of corporations, trusts, and nonprofit entities tied to him. These subpoenas aimed to uncover how his financial activities may have been facilitated or ignored by these institutions as part of the broader justice effort. Other financial entities reportedly included in subpoenas or scrutiny were Fidelity Investments, Charles Schwab, Bank Leumi, Wells Fargo, Northern Trust, and Silicon Valley Bank, reflecting the government's attempt to map the full extent of Epstein's banking relationships and financial flows.The most significant legal action has centered on JPMorgan Chase, which the USVI AG sued in federal court in New York in 2022, alleging that the bank “facilitated and concealed wire and cash transactions” that were part of Epstein's criminal enterprise and “financially benefitted” from his activities. JPMorgan ultimately agreed to pay $75 million to the USVI to settle those claims, acknowledging its past handling of Epstein's accounts but denying wrongdoing, while separate settlements with victims brought additional payouts tied to the bank's oversight failures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Part 1 - The Table Talks is in effect with Neville James, Rocky Liburd, Donald Cole and Willard Tutein as they highlight the fascinating life of Dr. Gilbert Sprauve. Sprauve, a professor of modern languages, has a Ph.D. in linguistics from Princeton University, He is a folklorist, a storyteller, a previous Virgin Islands senator, a community activist and a fisherman.

Just two days before his death, Jeffrey Epstein signed a last will and testament placing more than $577 million in assets into a trust known as The 1953 Trust, named after his birth year. The will, filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, listed his extensive holdings, including cash, equities, hedge fund investments, and high-end real estate in Manhattan, Palm Beach, Paris, New Mexico, and the Caribbean. By moving his fortune into a trust, Epstein made it significantly harder for his victims or prosecutors to access the assets directly through legal action, shielding his wealth behind layers of privacy.The will named two longtime Epstein associates—Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn—as executors, both of whom had close financial and legal ties to him for years. Critics immediately questioned the timing and secrecy, viewing it as a strategic move to protect his estate from victim compensation claims and government seizure. The creation of the trust also sparked concern among attorneys representing survivors, who feared it would obstruct justice and delay reparations. The move exemplified the kind of legal maneuvering Epstein was known for, even in death—securing the secrecy of his finances and shielding his inner circle from full exposure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comDisplayFile.aspx (vicourts.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

105 From Navy Vet to Multi-Industry Investor: Marcus Norman Reveals Wealth Strategies That Work The Entreprenudist Podcast https://entreprenudist.com Welcome to another game-changing episode of The Entreprenudist Podcast, the show where real entrepreneurs and business owners tell their stories with transparency, strategy, and truth. In this episode, we sit with Marcus Norman, a Navy veteran turned multi-industry investor known for his expertise in: -House Hacking -ATM Business Ownership Real Estate Investing -Starting a Business vs Buying a Franchise -Growing a Successful Podcast -Investing in CBD & Hemp -Understanding What Makes Money, Not Hype Marcus breaks down: -How he went from a five-bedroom liability to cash-flowing real estate -The mindset shift that separates successful investors from those stuck in analysis paralysis -How to truly understand how an investment makes money -Why working with experts is not optional His personal journey from the Virgin Islands to the military… and into wealth creation

Denise George, then the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, publicly and forcefully criticized the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, arguing that it functioned less as a vehicle for justice and more as a shield for Epstein's estate and potential co-conspirators. She warned that the fund was designed to resolve claims quickly and quietly, funneling survivors into private settlements in exchange for waiving future litigation rights. In George's view, this structure benefited the estate by limiting discovery, blocking depositions, and preventing deeper scrutiny into how Epstein operated for years in the USVI with apparent institutional failures and outside assistance.George further argued that the compensation fund undercut the territory's civil enforcement action by draining assets and closing off legal pathways that could expose enablers, financial facilitators, and government lapses. While she acknowledged that survivors deserved compensation, she maintained that speed and secrecy should not come at the expense of accountability or transparency. Her opposition placed her at odds with powerful interests tied to the estate and ultimately became part of a broader conflict that ended with her dismissal, reinforcing her claim that efforts to fully investigate Epstein's operation in the Virgin Islands were being systematically resisted rather than supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Denise George, during her tenure as Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, pushed aggressively to keep certain Epstein-related records sealed as she built a wide-ranging investigation into Epstein's criminal network and the financial infrastructure that supported it. Her position wasn't about protecting Epstein—it was about preserving the integrity of an active, highly sensitive investigation involving powerful institutions, international financial flows, and potential co-conspirators who had not yet been publicly named. George argued repeatedly in court filings that premature disclosure of subpoenas, deposition transcripts, banking records, and witness identities could alert targets, jeopardize evidence, and compromise ongoing law-enforcement efforts. She maintained that the scope of Epstein's activity in the USVI was deeper and more complex than previously understood, and that investigators needed the shield of sealed records to pursue leads without interference.At the same time, George's insistence on sealing certain documents reflected her awareness that the investigation threatened politically connected figures in the Virgin Islands and beyond. She sought to prevent leaks that could give advance warning to individuals who might destroy documents, move assets, or coordinate stories. Her critics accused her of being overly secretive, but George countered that the secrecy was temporary, legally justified, and essential to holding powerful actors accountable. Ironically, after she filed a sweeping lawsuit against JPMorgan alleging the bank knowingly enabled Epstein's trafficking operation, she was fired by the governor—an event that only amplified scrutiny of why the sealed records mattered and who might have been implicated. Her push to maintain strict confidentiality was ultimately part of a larger strategy: protect the investigation first, then reveal the truth once the evidence was secured.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the civil lawsuit between the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Epstein estate, the presiding judge ordered a 90-day pause in proceedings to allow for settlement discussions and procedural recalibration amid rapidly evolving circumstances. The stay temporarily halted discovery, motions, and court deadlines at a moment when the case was intensifying, with the USVI seeking expansive records and the estate pushing back on scope and burden. The pause was framed as a practical cooling-off period, giving both sides space to negotiate while the court assessed how overlapping lawsuits, asset distribution, and jurisdictional issues might affect the trajectory of the case.The effect of the pause, however, was controversial. Critics argued that the delay disproportionately benefited the estate by slowing momentum, limiting immediate access to documents, and allowing assets to continue flowing out through legal fees and administrative costs. For the USVI, which had positioned its lawsuit as a vehicle for uncovering how Epstein's operation functioned on the islands, the stay curtailed pressure at a critical juncture. While officially neutral, the 90-day pause became another flashpoint in the broader fight over whether the Epstein estate would be compelled toward transparency or permitted to manage the clock as effectively in death as Epstein had in life.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Following Jeffrey Epstein's death, the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands issued sweeping and aggressive demands for records from the Epstein estate as part of its civil enforcement action. The requests were expansive, seeking years of financial records, trust documents, corporate filings, wire transfers, bank communications, flight logs, visitor records, real estate files, employment rosters, and internal correspondence tied to Epstein's operations in the territory. The USVI made clear it was not merely interested in Epstein's personal assets, but in reconstructing the full infrastructure of his enterprise, including how money moved through shell companies, who facilitated those transactions, and which third parties benefited from or enabled his activities on the islands.The sheer scope of the document demands signaled that the USVI was attempting to map Epstein's network, not just liquidate his estate. Officials emphasized that Epstein's sex trafficking operation had operated openly in the territory for years and that the estate possessed critical evidence identifying enablers, contractors, government failures, and outside actors who may have been complicit or willfully blind. In response, the estate pushed back, arguing the requests were overly broad, burdensome, and intrusive, setting off protracted legal battles. The clash underscored a central tension in the post-Epstein reckoning: whether the estate would function as a gateway to transparency or act as a wall protecting the deeper machinery that allowed Epstein to operate with impunity in the USVI for decades.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the years following Jeffrey Epstein's death, the value of his estate steadily eroded as it became the focal point of mounting legal pressure and survivor claims. Multiple lawsuits, including the U.S. Virgin Islands' civil action and a wave of individual suits brought by survivors, triggered enormous legal expenses that quickly began draining estate resources. At the same time, the creation of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program authorized substantial payouts to hundreds of claimants, committing large sums of money early in the process. Although the estate was initially reported to hold hundreds of millions of dollars on paper, that figure proved highly misleading once legal fees, settlements, and administrative costs were factored in.Compounding the drain were asset liquidity problems and prolonged litigation that limited the estate's ability to convert property into cash without steep losses. High-profile assets such as Little St. James failed to sell at their initial inflated valuations, while ongoing disputes over financial disclosures further slowed the process. Critics noted that the estate repeatedly emphasized dwindling funds when resisting discovery or additional claims, even as significant sums continued flowing to lawyers, accountants, and administrators. By the time major litigation phases concluded, Epstein's once-massive fortune had been substantially reduced, leaving a bitter contrast between how aggressively the estate defended itself and how quickly its resources evaporated once forced to confront real accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This week, Marianna sits down with Dr. Tai Hunte-Ceasar, Chief Medical Officer at the Department of Health in the U.S. Virgin Islands, to talk about the use of AI chatbots in the HIV community. Tune in to learn how they can assist in linkage to care and what it means for the HIV workforce. -- Resources mentioned in this episode: https://jomprep.com/https://healthenews.mcgill.ca/marvin-the-first-ai-powered-hiv-care-chatbot/https://www.aimeesays.com/en/homehttps://www.mambaonline.com/2024/11/18/chemsex-harm-reduction-ai-chatbot-aims-to-tackle-stigma-and-improve-health/https://www.chattopat.com/--Help us track the number of listeners our episode gets by filling out this brief form! (https://www.e2NECA.org/?r=AQX7941)--Want to chat? Email us at podcast@necaaetc.org with comments or ideas for new episodes. --Check out our free online courses: www.necaaetc.org/rise-courses--Download our HIV mobile apps:Google Play Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=John+Faragon&hl=en_US&gl=USApple App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/virologyed-consultants-llc/id1216837691

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, sharply criticized the Epstein estate for what she described as deliberate secrecy designed to shield information and limit accountability. She argued that the estate consistently resisted disclosure of financial records, trust structures, and communications that could illuminate how Epstein amassed his wealth and who may have benefited from it. According to George, this lack of transparency obstructed legitimate government oversight and deprived the public and victims of insight into the full scope of Epstein's operations in the territory.George framed the estate's conduct as part of a broader effort to control the narrative and slow the path to justice, noting that critical decisions were made behind closed doors while key details remained hidden. She suggested that this secrecy was not accidental but strategic, serving to protect powerful interests connected to Epstein while frustrating attempts to trace assets and responsibility. In her view, the estate's opacity epitomized how Epstein's influence endured even after his death, continuing to impede accountability through legal and financial maneuvering rather than open disclosure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The subpoena issued to Bella Klein in the U.S. Virgin Islands' civil investigation into Jeffrey Epstein focused on uncovering the flow of money, services, and coordination surrounding Epstein's network while he operated in the territory. Klein—identified as someone involved in administrative, financial, or logistical support roles tied to Epstein's businesses or personal operations—was ordered to provide records that could clarify how Epstein moved funds, paid staff, managed shell companies, and maintained his properties in the USVI. Investigators sought emails, financial documents, contracts, and communication logs that might reveal whether Klein knowingly or unknowingly helped facilitate the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to operate with minimal scrutiny. Her records were viewed as potentially valuable in mapping out the estate's internal operations, identifying additional witnesses, and tracing transactions relevant to the government's claims of enabling and failure-to-supervise by those around Epstein.The subpoena also reflected the broader strategy of the USVI government: building a detailed picture of Epstein's support system by targeting individuals who might have firsthand knowledge of how his enterprises functioned day to day. Klein's testimony and documents were expected to help determine who helped coordinate travel, manage staff, handle money transfers, and interface with Epstein's associates and corporate entities. Her cooperation was seen as a pathway to understanding whether key figures—including the Epstein estate executors and longtime aides—used employees or intermediaries to conceal payments, disguise services, or maintain operational continuity after Epstein's arrest. In short, the subpoena to Bella Klein was part of the USVI's effort to expose the internal machinery that allowed Epstein's criminal enterprise to run under the radar for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeffrey Epstein's operation in the U.S. Virgin Islands has been described by investigators, victims, and court filings as a conveyor belt of exploitation, with some accounts indicating he “entertained” up to seven girls per day. These weren't social visits — they were scheduled, arranged, and controlled encounters designed to keep a steady stream of vulnerable young girls flowing through his secluded compound. The island's isolation made escape nearly impossible, and the environment functioned like a privately run trafficking hub where Epstein dictated every movement. The volume of girls brought in each day underscored the industrial, systematic nature of his abuse network, revealing a pattern far more calculated and relentless than the sanitized narrative his defenders once tried to sell.The more recent revelations about the inside of his U.S. Virgin Islands home only deepen the horror. Among the disturbing details was a full dentist chair installed inside one of the rooms — a bizarre and deeply unsettling piece of equipment that victims say aligns with the coercive, clinical, and dehumanizing environment he created. Along with the chair were eerie masks, strange décor, and a setting that looked less like a private residence and more like a place engineered for control and intimidation. While authorities have never provided an official explanation for the chair, its presence reinforces what survivors have long described: Epstein built spaces designed to dominate, manipulate, and terrify the young girls trapped within his orbit.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The filing comes from a major civil action in the Southern District of New York brought by six Jane Doe plaintiffs, each suing individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against a wide array of defendants tied to the U.S. Virgin Islands government. The defendants include the Government of the USVI, former governors, senators, the First Lady, the Attorney General, congressional delegate Stacey Plaskett, and up to 100 unnamed individuals. The lawsuit is part of the broader litigation concerning the role USVI officials allegedly played in enabling, protecting, or benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein's operations in the territory. This particular document is a memorandum of law submitted by the plaintiffs' attorneys at Merson Law, PLLC, and it signals that the plaintiffs are actively expanding and refining their claims as new information continues to surface.Specifically, the plaintiffs are asking the court for permission to amend their complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) and to obtain targeted discovery related to jurisdiction and venue. In short, they are arguing that additional facts and defendants need to be formally added to the record and that limited discovery is necessary to establish why the SDNY is the appropriate forum for the case. The motion reflects the plaintiffs' position that the alleged misconduct by USVI officials is broader and more interconnected than originally understood and that formal discovery will reveal further evidence of systemic failures and complicity. By seeking leave to amend and pushing for early jurisdictional discovery, the plaintiffs are attempting to ensure that the case proceeds on its full factual footing rather than being constrained by procedural defenses raised by the USVI and individual defendants.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Tonight we're diving back into the Epstein scandal because it is far from over. Today, House Democrats released never-before-seen photos and videos from Epstein's island in the U.S. Virgin Islands… and “creepy” doesn't even begin to describe them. The material raises even more questions about who visited, what happened there, and how much has been kept from the public. So how much more is still out there? Will the full Epstein files ever actually be released? Join us live as we break down the political fallout and what this latest release means for transparency and for the powerful people who still don't want these files to see the light of day. This episode is sponsored by ZBiotics. Go to https://zbiotics.com/LEMON and use LEMON at checkout for 15% off first time orders. This episode is brought to you by the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Visit https://FFRF.US/SHOP or DON to 511 511 From Black Friday through December 9th, you can get 20% off all FFRF merchandise — wear your principles, speak your truth. And you can give the gift of freethought with a 2-for-1 membership offer. Join FFRF and get a free gift membership for a fellow freethinker in your life. New U.S. memberships only. Not renewals. Not lifetime tiers. Just a chance to grow the movement and defend real liberty. This episode is sponsored by Aura Frames. Exclusive $35 off Carver Mat at https://on.auraframes.com/DONLEMON. Promo Code DONLEMON. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at https://betterhelp.com/donlemon and get on your way to being your best self This episode is brought to you by Lean. Every Brickhouse product — from better sleep to superior collagen — is 30% off. But hurry, because these Black Friday deals go fast. Visit https://BrickhouseSale.com and save 30%. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger PictureCalifornia is imploding, they want to retroactively tax billionaires, they are becoming desperate. Trump has brought fuel down below $2 in Co. Trump shows the country he has reversed everything that Biden has done. Trump lets the people know that Liberation day is coming, we will be liberated from the [CB]. The [DS] is panicking, Trump is dismantling the drug, human, child trafficking networks. Trump is exposing which countries are involved in manipulating the election. The [DS] is fighting back trying to remove the leaders of the agencies, this will fail. The [DS] will push for riots and war and Trump is already putting things into place to counter all of this. Liberation Day is approaching. Economy https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1995869912196161753?s=20   unveiled a retroactive billionaire tax targeting 2025 residency. The 5% levy applies even if the individual has already relocated, turning “temporary” fiscal policy into a weapon against those who stayed too long. While courts have sometimes upheld narrow retroactive taxes, justices from Scalia to O'Connor have warned against exactly this kind of “bait-and-switch” confiscation. As California's population and revenue base shrink, the state appears willing to gamble on a constitutionally dubious wealth grab to plug the holes. (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1995607860026507467?s=20 Manufacturing Surveys Show Conflicting Signals: Growth or Contraction? Two closely watched surveys of U.S. manufacturing activity painted sharply divergent pictures in November, with one showing continued expansion and the other reporting accelerating contraction, highlighting deep uncertainty about the sector's health amid ongoing adjustment to the new rules of global trade. The S&P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI registered 52.2 in November, marking the fourth consecutive month above the 50 threshold that separates expansion from contraction. However, the reading slipped from 52.5 in October. By contrast, the ISM Manufacturing PMI fell to 48.2, down from 48.7 in October and marking the ninth consecutive month of contraction. The divergence places the two surveys on opposite sides of the expansion-contraction divide, an unusual occurrence that suggests significantly different conditions across the manufacturing landscape.  https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1995904464625000594?s=20   the national debt. He adds that in the future Americans will no longer have to pay income tax at all. https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1995906384764846376?s=20 Reminder, that the objective of the tariffs is not just using trade to secure peace. It's about freeing the American People from slavery via income tax. That's why Trump called it “Liberation Day” when he implemented the tariff economic plan. The goal is no income tax. Political/Rights https://twitter.com/LiberalsLeaving/status/1995524375534321766?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1995524375534321766%7Ctwgr%5E1abd29295b52f4bb4422e1469e33d198815032f8%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F12%2Fellen-degeneres-planning-crawl-back-united-states-after%2F  OUTRAGE: New York Quietly Releases Nearly 7,000 Dangerous Illegal Migrants Including Rapists, Killers, Terrorists, and Repeat Offenders With Zero Notice to ICE   U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Todd Lyons has issued an explosive letter to New York Attorney General Letitia James, demanding immediate action after state and local officials quietly released nearly 7,000 criminal illegal aliens, including rapists, killers, gang members, and repeat violent offenders, without honoring ICE detainers and without a single notification to federal authorities. Since January 20, New York has released 6,947 criminal illegal aliens back onto the streets. These offenders are tied to: 29 homicides 2,509 assaults 199 burglaries 305 robberies 392 dangerous drug offenses 300 weapons offenses 207 sexual predatory offenses Worse, another 7,113 criminal aliens remain in New York custody today, all with active ICE detainers that state officials continue to ignore. These detainees include: 148 charged with homicide 717 charged with assault 134 charged with burglary 106 charged with robbery 235 dangerous drug offenses 152 weapons offenses 260 sexual predatory offenses Source: thegatewaypundit.com  https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1995618958586904896?s=20 https://twitter.com/ColonelTowner/status/1995674641591873840?s=20   similar and blind sided the CIA and a few months later another one was exposed that wasn't on the completed list. They're paid out of proprietary companies that no one tracks. https://twitter.com/mattvanswol/status/1995652622112760293?s=20   invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS. WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE. https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1995735514469527661?s=20 DOGE Geopolitical https://twitter.com/JoeLang51440671/status/1995662088337768634?s=20 Delegation of U.S. Representatives From Intelligence Committee Traveled to Honduras to “Observe” Election   , a delegation of U.S. Representatives traveled to Honduras to personally “participate in observation” of their elections to “underscore the United States' continued support for transparent, credible, and peaceful democratic processes in the region,” according to a press release from Representative Rick Crawford, the Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. https://twitter.com/RepRickCrawford/status/1995625707318509587?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1995625707318509587%7Ctwgr%5Ecbef4e85d24884b779ca77c501bc569911e36442%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F12%2Fdelegation-u-s-representatives-intelligence-committee-traveled-honduras%2F  Hemisphere neighborhood rests heavily on our key allies’ ability to instill trust in their commitment to democracy and the administering of free and fair elections. The people of Honduras made it very clear they wanted U.S. eyes on this election, and they showed up in droves at voting locations yesterday to peacefully exercise their right to determine the future of their country. Source: thegatewaypundit.com War/Peace Trump gives Maduro a week to leave Venezuela… and the latter requests a full pardon Trump gives Maduro a week to leave Venezuela… and the latter requests a full pardon   Maduro also expressed his willingness to leave his country on the condition that he and his family members receive a full legal pardon that includes lifting all US sanctions and ending the high-profile case he faces before the International Criminal Court. These developments come as Maduro appeared before a crowd near the presidential palace, affirming his “absolute loyalty” to the Venezuelan people, surrounded by senior officials in his government. Source:  iraqidinarchat.net  Trump's Latin American Allies Against Venezuela  alliances are shaping up in the Caribbean, with many countries abandoning Venezuela and supporting the United States. Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro is becoming increasingly isolated as regional governments shift away from Chavismo and move closer to Washington. Honduras and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, once reliable partners for Caracas, have both elected new governments that pledged to distance themselves from Maduro.  Honduras   Argentina, Ecuador, El Salvador, and Bolivia have also deteriorated as those countries shifted to the right. Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, both U.S. territories, have seen a renewed military buildup, with fighter jets and transport aircraft operating from Cold War-era facilities such as Roosevelt Roads and new activity at St. Croix's airport. Grenada is considering a U.S. request to host temporary radar equipment and personnel at Maurice Bishop International Airport. The government is still weighing technical and safety concerns, and the decision is complicated by the 1983 U.S. invasion and the airport's symbolic significance. Colombia remains the strongest partner, working closely with the United States on counter-narcotics, sanctions enforcement, and intelligence sharing, while also coordinating policy on the region's largest population of Venezuelan refugees. Paraguay and Uruguay consistently vote with Washington at the OAS to isolate Maduro and support democratic transition efforts. Ecuador works with the United States on organized crime, Venezuelan gang activity, and sanctions evasion, and has been publicly critical of the regime.  Maduro's remaining allies in the region are Cuba and Nicaragua, but neither is positioned to provide meaningful assistance. Cuba publicly supports Venezuela but is facing a severe economic crisis and avoids committing to any response if the United States takes military action  source: thegatewaypundit.com  https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1995595335771836726?s=20 https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1995682004151783727?s=20 New York Times Catches Washington Post Red-Handed Defaming Pete Hegseth as a ‘War Criminal' Regarding Previous Strike on Narcotrafficking Boats – Reveals Full Story Behind Attack  The narrative regarding Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordering the killing of survivors in a boat attack in the Caribbean has officially been debunked by a highly unlikely source, which revealed the full story behind the attack. Source:thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/SeanParnellUSA/status/1995674824715501844?s=20 https://twitter.com/JDVance/status/1995883027881144762?s=20   countless “anonymous” leaks meant to undermine him and thwart President Trump and other Realists in the Administration. Bogus story after bogus story. It's the same tired playbook. And for their next act? —They want him tried for war crimes. Yep—war crimes. They intend to prosecute another political opponent. They have lost it. Congressional Democrats are fueled by a radicalized Leftist base and are hellbent on power. The rules don't matter to them. At all. Sound familiar? Russiagate, Dem censorship, Covid tyranny, Dem weaponization of DOJ TO MY FELLOW REPUBLICANS: Understand this reality and never bend the knee to this bullshit. Fight back. The liberal media will never love you. If Europe wants a war, we are ready to fight now, says Vladimir Putin   Putin Says ‘Ready For War’ Against Europe If Attacks On Russian Tankers, Energy Continue   Europe, which has been largely sidelined when it comes to the US peace plan version, Putin is angry. He denounced a recent series of drone strikes on oil and gas tankers carrying Russian energy exports acts of “piracy”. He also on Tuesday made clear that European demands related to Moscow are not at all acceptable, suggesting that they are by intention an effort to prod and anger Russia. He said that “Europe only proposes unacceptable demands,” according to Interfax. “They are on the side of war,” he said of the Europeans. “Russia has no intention of going to war with European countries. But if Europe wants war Russia is ready” – Putin has told journalists before meeting Witkoff and Kushner. https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/1995873487806751007?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1995873487806751007%7Ctwgr%5Ebba698f8622537fd3d54c6bdae932a981c0c754e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fgeopolitical%2Fputin-threatens-ready-war-against-europe-if-attacks-russian-tankers-energy-continue *  Source: zerohedge.com https://twitter.com/BRICSinfo/status/1995883653524848869?s=20 Trump's Push to End the Ukraine War Is Sowing Fresh Fear About NATO's Future This week will bring a split screen that will reinforce growing doubts in Europe about the American commitment to the alliance that has served as the bedrock of Western unity since the end of World War II. On one side, White House special envoy Steve Witkoff will be in Moscow for the latest round of peace talks with the Kremlin over the Ukraine war. Witkoff, who has yet to visit Ukraine, is making his sixth trip to Moscow this year. Source: wsj.com Medical/False Flags https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1995856194779402737?s=20  . Why is this? False Alarms: Rethinking Breast Cancer Screening https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1995887210965729768?s=20 [DS] Agenda  https://twitter.com/SecDuffy/status/1995649610488914054?s=20   fix this or lose $30 million in federal funding  https://twitter.com/SecScottBessent/status/1995615377284628908?s=20 @POTUS @realDonaldTrump , we are acting fast to ensure Americans' taxes are not funding acts of global terror. We will share our findings as our investigation continues. “President Trump is Threatening to Kill Me!” – Dem Senator Mark Kelly Goes on Insane Rant During Presser on ‘Pentagon Intimidation' (VIDEO) Democrat Senator Mark Kelly claimed Trump threatened to kill him during a press conference on ‘Pentagon intimidation' on Monday. Mark Kelly is one of the ‘Seditious Six' Democrat lawmakers who urged members of the military to defy Trump's orders. Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1995606715190890968?s=20   run a foreign influence operation targeting the very government his twin serves in. United24, created by Ukraine's Ministry of Digital Transformation using a USAID-funded infrastructure, appointed Scott Kelly, Senator Mark Kelly’s twin brother, as its ambassador to help raise money for the propaganda outlet. Since then it has raised $2.72 billion, much of it routed quietly via cryptocurrency. United24 produces coordinated messaging marketed as “fact-checking” and “anti-corruption efforts,” but in practice operates as a state propaganda engine shaping US public opinion and Congressional support for Ukraine's war. JUST IN: Schumer Claims Three of His New York Offices Received “MAGA” Bomb Threats (VIDEO)  Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Monday claimed three of his offices received “MAGA” bomb threats.   Schumer said he was informed that his offices received the threats from emails with the subject line ‘MAGA' from an email address claiming the ‘2020 election was rigged.' https://twitter.com/tararosenblum/status/1995601284892971273?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1995601284892971273%7Ctwgr%5Ec0381dd15615388f5e8a8ba9d4cced6b8217b451%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F12%2Fschumer-claims-three-his-new-york-offices-received%2F Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/1995838817975370228?s=20   Scott Kelly (Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appointed Mark Kelly's twin brother, Scott Kelly as an ambassador for Ukraine’s official fundraising platform, UNITED24) to leak ‘stories’ to the media and undermine Secretary Hegseth. https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/1995847809627766919?s=20   Nuland, Samantha Power, Lisa Monaco, and Susan Rice. https://twitter.com/TonySeruga/status/1946588339488038984?s=20 minutes to the Obama's War Room residence, sight unseen. President Trump's Plan https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1995914978730144246?s=20  and will begin to stop moving federal funds into those states until they comply.” https:/twitter.com/amuse/status/1995847602743439722?s=20 Amuse: LAWFARE: Trump just removed another 8 pro-illegal immigration judges in Manhattan, 90 fired so far as he restores rule of law to the immigration courts. On December 1, the Trump administration dismissed eight immigration judges at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan for patterns of excessive asylum approvals, refusal to enforce statutory standards and unmanageable processing delays. This brings Trump's total removals to 90 judges nationwide. The administration says the effort is necessary to dismantle the pipeline of activist judges who reward illegal entry with near-automatic asylum approvals. Conservatives call it long-overdue accountability; opponents concede the judges had serious performance issues. https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1995586287064039445?s=20   witnessing a Judicial Insurrection. BREAKING: DOJ to Hit Comey, Letitia James with New Indictments As Soon as This Week The DOJ is seeking new indictments against James Comey and Letitia James after a Clinton judge dismissed both of their cases last week. A grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted former FBI Director James Comey in September. He was indicted on two counts – false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia last month. Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1995886116356968591?s=20   grip on power. Democrats tried to block all three from serving. When that failed, they turned to nonstop “anonymous sources,” fake jacket stories, bogus intelligence leaks, and now a desperate push to prosecute Hegseth for imaginary war crimes. Their radicalized base demands a new Russiagate every month, and congressional Democrats are delivering, rules be damned. This is the same machinery that fueled censorship, Covid authoritarianism, and DOJ abuse. The only response: refuse to bow. https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1995623545377096023?s=20    Trump is back to pushing for the Senate to terminate the filibuster.   (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

Democrats openly called for a military insurrection against Donald Trump, then cried crocodile tears after he called them out. Ross Patterson's new book, “The Final Inch,” charts at #1, and he joins the show to discuss. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) triples down on defending Democratic House Delegate Stacey Plaskett of the U.S. Virgin Islands, who was caught texting pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Congress wastes everyone's time and money voting for pointless gestures. Logan Hall joins the panel.   ► Subscribe to “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered”!https://www.youtube.com/@SaraGonzalesUnfiltered?sub_confirmation=1Today's   Today's Sponsors:   ► Select QuoteGet the right life insurance for YOU, for LESS, and save more than 50%  at https://www.SelectQuote.com/SARA today.   ► PreBornDonate securely at https://www.preborn.com/sara or dial #250, keyword BABY.   ► Masa ChipsGo to http://www.masachips.com/GONZALES and use code GONZALES for 25% off your first order.   ► BlazeTVJoin today at https://www.blazetv.com/SARA and get $20 off right now. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Democrats are doing damage control after weaponizing the Epstein files. Democratic Rep. Stacey Plaskett of the U.S. Virgin Islands was exposed for colluding with Jeffrey Epstein on how to get dirt on Trump. Democrat senators release a video that calls for a military insurrection against Donald Trump. Muslims in Dearborn turn violent against protesters. Seattle's 43-year-old socialist mayor-elect, Katie Wilson, brags about how she no longer needs her parents to send her money. Matthew Marsden and Adam Johnson join the show.    ► Subscribe to “Sara Gonzales Unfiltered”! https://www.youtube.com/@SaraGonzalesUnfiltered?sub_confirmation=1    Today's Sponsors:   ► Relief Factor  Visit https://www.relieffactor.com or call 1-800-4-Relief to try the three-week QuickStart today.   ► PreBorn  Donate securely at https://www.preborn.com/sara or dial #250, keyword BABY.   ► American Giant  Go to https://www.american-giant.com and use offer code THEBLAZE for 30% off.   ► BlazeTV  Join today at https://www.blazetv.com/SARA and get $20 off right now. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices