Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

The Kouri Richins trial brings Robert Josh Grossman, Kouri's lover, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The Long Island Serial Killer's family is split. The trial is coming. And both women may be victims of the same alleged lie.In today's episode, we examine the Gilgo Beach Killer family fracture—why his ex-wife Asa Ellerup still calls Rex her "hero" while daughter Victoria has publicly stated she believes he's "most likely" guilty of the Long Island murders.According to the Peacock documentary, Asa described Rex as her "savior" from a difficult first marriage. She said visiting him in jail felt like "a first date." Their divorce was finalized in March 2025—but she still refers to him as "my husband."Victoria's evolution was different. She acknowledged there were places in the Massapequa Park house she wasn't allowed as a child. She spoke with BTK's daughter about living in the aftermath. By the documentary's release, she'd reached her conclusion about LISK.But here's what makes the Gilgo Beach case even more disturbing. According to court documents, female hairs found on multiple victims' remains along Ocean Parkway were allegedly consistent with DNA from Asa and Victoria. Neither woman is accused of involvement. Suffolk County prosecutors say the hair was transferred from Rex's clothing.The women in the alleged Long Island Serial Killer's life were allegedly connected to murder victims they never knew existed. Their hair allegedly helped build the prosecution's case.The family unknowingly provided the evidence.They'll all be in the same courtroom in September 2026—one believing innocent, one believing guilty.Both are collateral damage in the Gilgo Beach case.Part 3 of 5.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachKiller #LISK #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #GilgoBeachMurders #OceanParkway #SuffolkCounty

The Kouri Richins trial brings Kristal Bowman-Carter, estate planning attorney, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Two trials. Two prosecutions facing serious problems. Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke on True Crime Today for comprehensive analysis of the Kouri Richins murder case and the Colin Gray school shooting trial as both reach decisive moments.The Richins prosecution has called over twenty witnesses but can't get past a fundamental problem: the state's own former Chief Medical Examiner testified Eric's death certificate still says "undetermined." Not homicide. Four years later. The drug-chain witnesses contradict each other—one says oxycodone, one says fentanyl. A detective told Carmen Lauber "the goal is to convict Kouri for aggravated murder." Hair follicle tests were never performed. The copperware wasn't tested. The defense has 35 witnesses and may not need them.Colin Gray's family destroyed his defense. His daughter Jenni—14, now in foster care, using a different name—testified he asked her to "cover for him." His wife Marcee said she begged him to lock up the guns and physically tried to take the rifle from Colt. Text messages showed Colt warning "the blood is on your hands" weeks before Apalachee High School.Colin claims he thought photos of Nikolas Cruz in Colt's bedroom were "the guy from Green Day." His wife and daughter both testified he knew exactly who Cruz was. That's a credibility problem a crying defendant can't fix.The morning timeline: Colt's 9:42 a.m. text saying "I'm sorry… it's not your fault." Colin asking what's wrong. Not calling the school. Not leaving work. First shots at 10:22 a.m. Then stopping at QuikTrip for a drink on his way home.Bob Motta analyzes what both defense teams need to accomplish—and whether either case is already decided.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ColinGray #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #EricRichins #ColtGray #MedicalExaminer #FamilyTestimony #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski

The Kouri Richins trial brings Christina Miller, Divorce Attorney, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

When we talk about domestic abuse, we talk about bruises.We almost never talk about money. And that's a problem.This is Part 3 of "Surviving the Fog"—examining financial abuse through the Kouri Richins case. We're not diagnosing anyone. We're exploring documented patterns.Prosecutors allege Kouri was $4.5 million in debt when Eric died. Over 200 overdraft transactions. A mansion closing she allegedly couldn't afford. If those allegations are true, this is financial coercive control at its most extreme—and most deadly—conclusion.Financial abuse creates invisible chains. Debt without full disclosure. Controlled accounts. Sabotaged employment. Constant chaos that keeps you too overwhelmed to see the pattern.The word "we" becomes a weapon. "We" bears consequences while one person makes decisions.When you ask for visibility, you're the problem. You're controlling. You don't trust them.The shame keeps victims silent. The debt follows them out. Destroyed credit, joint debt, no resources—even leaving doesn't break the chains.And financial desperation is a lethality indicator. When the house of cards falls, danger escalates.Financial abuse is abuse—even without physical violence.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #FinancialAbuse #SurvivingTheFog #CoerciveControl #EricRichins #EconomicAbuse #DomesticViolence #InvisibleChains #NarcissisticAbuse

The Kouri Richins trial brings Anne Coates, Senior Manager at CMFG Live Insurance, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

A Georgia jury just made history. Colin Gray—guilty of second-degree murder on all counts. Less than two hours of deliberation. The father who armed his troubled son now faces up to 180 years in prison.True Crime Today breaks down the Colin Gray verdict with criminal defense attorney Bob Motta.This is only the third time in American history a parent has been held criminally responsible for a school shooting committed by their child. The Crumbleys got manslaughter in Michigan. Georgia prosecutors went bigger—and won murder convictions.The evidence was relentless. An FBI warning Colin Gray ignored in 2023 after his son threatened to shoot up a school. A Christmas gift AR-15 kept unsecured in a 14-year-old's bedroom. A "shrine" to Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz. Texts from Colt Gray warning his father: "Whenever something happens just know the blood is on your hands."His own daughter testified he pressured her to lie to investigators. His estranged wife said she begged him to lock up the guns and was knocked down trying to take the rifle from Colt's room. Body cam footage showed Colin saying "God, I knew it" within minutes of the shooting.Colin Gray was his own only defense witness. He cried on the stand. He insisted he never saw it coming. The jury needed under two hours to convict on every single count.Bob Motta analyzes the trial, the defense failures, and what this verdict means for parental accountability going forward.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#ColinGray #TrueCrimeToday #GuiltyVerdict #ApalacheeShooting #SchoolShooting #MurderConviction #BobMotta #ParentalAccountability #ColtGray #TrueCrime

The Kouri Richins murder trial entered its second week in Park City, Utah with a witness prosecutors have been building toward since opening statements — a forensic accountant who spent the day methodically dismantling any notion that Kouri Richins' finances were simply the casualty of an ambitious businesswoman moving too fast.Brooke Karrington, with more than thirty years of forensic accounting experience, walked the jury through a financial picture that prosecutors argue makes their case: by the time Eric Richins died on March 4, 2022, his wife was carrying $7.5 million in debt, burning through $80,000 a month in payments, and cycling through four separate payday lenders at $2,100 per day. Her business account had been described — from the stand — as "perpetually in the hole." She had written $60,000 in checks to herself that bounced. She had claimed 147 employees to a lender while her bank balance sat at $1,500.The day after Eric died, she purchased a $2.9 million mansion. Seven days after that, she tried to sell it. It eventually foreclosed.Kouri collected $1.35 million from Eric's life insurance policies. By September 2022, after spending it all, forensic records show she had approximately $800 left.The defense argued the financial evidence is speculative, that Eric had access to the same accounts, and that debt does not equal motive for murder. Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.The trial continues — and the jury now has the full financial picture in front of them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #UtahMurderTrial #FentanylMurder #LifeInsuranceMurder #ForensicAccounting #MurderTrial2026

The Kouri Richins trial brings Lashawnda Rodgers & Brian Frecklton, insurance & financial advisors, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

A new federal lawsuit filed this week accuses Michael Jackson's estate of child trafficking. The plaintiffs: four members of the Cascio family, siblings Jackson called his "second family" for over twenty-five years.According to court documents, Edward, Dominic, Marie-Nicole, and Aldo Cascio allege Jackson abused them beginning when some were as young as seven years old. They claim he groomed and isolated each child during trips around the world—including the Dangerous Tour, HIStory Tour, and visits to Neverland Ranch.The allegations are explosive. But so is the family's history of defending Jackson.Frank Cascio wrote a 2011 book declaring Jackson's innocence. The family appeared on Oprah in 2010 saying Jackson was never inappropriate. As recently as 2018, Frank was trying to turn his book into a TV series celebrating his friendship with Jackson.The estate calls this extortion. Attorney Marty Singer says the Cascios already received a settlement worth over three million dollars—then allegedly demanded two hundred thirteen million more.The Cascios say they were coerced into signing that settlement without lawyers while still processing trauma from watching "Leaving Neverland."A fifth sibling, Eddie, is pursuing separate claims in arbitration. He's also connected to the fake tracks scandal—songs he sold to the estate that Jackson's own family says weren't Michael's voice.Their attorney is Mark Geragos, who defended Jackson in 2003 and called him innocent. Now he's arguing the opposite.A hearing is set for March 5th. Michael Jackson was acquitted in 2005 and denied all allegations. His estate continues to deny them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MichaelJackson #CascioFamily #BreakingNews #JacksonEstate #ChildTraffickingLawsuit #LeavingNeverland #FrankCascio #TrueCrimeToday #MarkGeragos #MichaelJackson2026

The Moscow Mule theory is central to the prosecution's case against Kouri Richins. They claim she slipped fentanyl into her husband's drink. But crime scene technician Chelsea Gipson admitted under cross-examination that the kitchen was never searched the night Eric died. Neither was the basement. The copperware allegedly used for the cocktails was never tested.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke break down the investigative failures exposed during the Kouri Richins trial with defense attorney Bob Motta on True Crime Today. An empty hydrocodone bottle sat in Eric's nightstand—never tested. Investigators only went back to collect certain items after a private investigator hired by Eric's family flagged them. The medical examiner's office never tested hair follicles that could have shown whether Eric was a long-term fentanyl user.Carmen Lauber—the prosecution's star witness on drug supply—admitted she tested positive for methamphetamine during the relevant time period. She changed her story after receiving immunity from three different jurisdictions. And a detective told her explicitly that "the goal is to convict Kouri for aggravated murder" before she testified.The defense team of Kathy Nester, Wendy Lewis, and Alex Ramos hasn't called a single witness yet. Through cross-examination alone, they've surfaced questions about the investigation's integrity, exposed contradictions in testimony, and highlighted forensic tests that were never performed despite being available.Bob Motta analyzes whether reasonable doubt is already established or whether the defense has peaked too early. The prosecution still has witnesses to call. The defense has 35 of their own waiting. This case is far from decided—but the gaps in the investigation may already be too wide to close.What absolutely has to happen for either side to win?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #CrimeScene #BobMotta #InvestigativeFailure #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #UtahTrial #ForensicEvidence

The prosecution in the Kouri Richins murder trial has a problem they can't explain away. Their own former Chief Medical Examiner—Dr. Erik Christensen—testified that Eric Richins' death certificate still lists manner of death as "undetermined." Four years of investigation. Dozens of witnesses. And the man who analyzed the body won't call it murder.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke break down the latest trial developments with defense attorney Bob Motta on True Crime Today. The state played what they hoped would be damning evidence—a nine-minute recording of Kouri calling Christensen's office asking detailed questions about the substances found in Eric's body. But does that call show consciousness of guilt, or a widow desperately trying to understand how her husband died?The drug-chain witnesses are falling apart under scrutiny. Robert Crozier testified he only sold oxycodone to Carmen Lauber—not fentanyl—because "everybody was scared of fentanyl" at the time. That flatly contradicts Lauber's testimony. When your two key witnesses can't agree on what drugs were even involved, the prosecution's theory has a foundational crack.Bob Motta walks through the elements the state still hasn't proven: what drugs Carmen actually obtained, how fentanyl entered Eric's system, and most critically—that Kouri was the one who administered it. No fentanyl has ever been recovered from the Richins home. The copperware allegedly used for the Moscow Mules was never tested. An empty hydrocodone bottle in Eric's nightstand was never analyzed.The prosecution has called over twenty witnesses. The defense hasn't even started their case yet. Is the state running out of time to connect the dots—or is there more coming that changes everything?Bob Motta doesn't speculate. He analyzes what the evidence actually shows.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #FentanylCase #MurderTrial #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #UtahCrime #CourtNews

Prosecutors call it LISK's "blueprint for murder." Defense calls it circumstantial. Today we examine every section of the planning document allegedly found on the Gilgo Beach Killer's hard drive.The file was hidden in unallocated space—someone tried to delete it. Forensic analysts recovered it. According to court documents, it allegedly contained eighty-seven details organized into operational sections."Supplies" allegedly listed cutting tools, acid, tarps, cat litter. "Body Prep" allegedly stated: "remove head and hands, remove ID marks like tattoos." "Things to Remember" allegedly contained the Long Island Serial Killer's lessons from previous crimes."Hit harder," one entry allegedly read. "Light rope broke under stress of being tightened."Suffolk County DA Ray Tierney stated: "The methodology in that document is in some cases identical to the methodology used to murder the victims in this case."Jessica Taylor was found along Ocean Parkway decapitated with mutilated tattoos. Valerie Mack's remains were scattered in a similar pattern. The document allegedly describes exactly this methodology.But here's the detail that takes the Gilgo Beach case to another level: references to FBI profiler John Douglas's Mindhunter. Specific page numbers. Prosecutors allege LISK studied behavioral analysis to avoid getting caught.When investigators returned to the alleged Long Island Serial Killer's basement, infrared examination allegedly revealed physical evidence matching the document's descriptions. Adhesive residue. Push pins in the drop ceiling.The defense has challenged the DNA evidence and pointed to other suspects. Rex Heuermann has pleaded not guilty to all Gilgo Beach murder charges.The LISK trial is set for September 2026. Part 2 of 5.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #LISK #GilgoBeachKiller #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #GilgoBeachMurders #PlanningDocument #OceanParkway #SuffolkCounty #Mindhunter

The Kouri Richins trial brings Brooke Karrington, Forensic Accountant, to the stand for part two in this testimony.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke — 21 years with the Bureau, former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — breaks down two of the biggest cases in the country across three distinct segments.The Nancy Guthrie suspect: Dreeke argues the endless criticism of amateur execution misses the point. The cheap backpack, awkward holster, improvised camera cover — that's not unusually sloppy. That's baseline criminal behavior. Hollywood has created unrealistic expectations. The cases that get solved look exactly like this. The messy execution and four-week evasion are both within normal range.The Nancy Guthrie investigation: federal sources accusing Sheriff Nanos of blocking evidence access, DNA routed to Florida instead of Quantico, crime scene released before the FBI secured it, public contradictions about basic facts. Dreeke's assessment: this is what multi-agency investigations actually look like. The friction exists on every major case. It just stays invisible when no one's watching. National scrutiny creates impossible standards.The Kouri Richins trial: five days of testimony have produced competing narratives. The prosecution's star witness Carmen Lauber claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri — but she was using meth, got immunity from three jurisdictions, and her supplier now contradicts her. Kouri has maintained composure through all of it. Dreeke identifies the behavioral indicators that reveal reliability despite credibility problems, reads Crozier's reversal, assesses Kouri's sustained performance, and addresses when behavioral evidence becomes more persuasive than missing physical evidence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RobinDreeke #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #SavannahGuthrie #EricRichins #BehavioralAnalysis #DeceptionDetection #HiddenKillers

The Kouri Richins trial brings Brooke Karrington, Forensic Accountant, to the stand for part two in this testimony.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Prosecutors allege Kouri Richins was $4.5 million in debt. 200+ overdraft transactions. A mansion closing she allegedly couldn't afford. All while Eric apparently didn't know the full picture.How do you miss financial catastrophe in your own marriage?The fog.This is Part 2 of "Surviving the Fog"—examining coercive control through the Kouri Richins case. We're not diagnosing anyone. We're exploring documented abuse patterns.Gaslighting is sustained manipulation that dismantles your perception of reality. They deny what happened. They attack your credibility. They flip the script until you're apologizing for confronting them about something real.The fog is also engineered chaos. Constant crisis keeps you in survival mode. You can't analyze the pattern when you're putting out fires. And whenever you start seeing clearly? A new emergency appears.Cognitive dissonance freezes you. "I love this person" and "this person is destroying me" can't coexist—so your brain rejects the truth.The confusion is the strategy. A clear-eyed partner would leave. They need you disoriented.You're not losing your mind. Someone is working very hard to make you feel that way.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #Gaslighting #SurvivingTheFog #DARVO #NarcissisticAbuse #EricRichins #CoerciveControl #PsychologicalAbuse #DomesticViolence

The Kouri Richins trial brings Brooke Karrington, Forensic Accountant, to the stand for part two in this testimony.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Five days of testimony in the Kouri Richins murder trial have produced a credibility war. The prosecution's star witness claims she bought fentanyl for Kouri four times. The defense has exposed her meth use, her immunity deals, and her supplier's reversal. Kouri has maintained composure through it all. Former FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke breaks down who's telling the truth — and how to know.Dreeke served 21 years with the Bureau, including as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. Reading people in high-stakes environments was his specialty. He understands what behavioral signals indicate reliability despite credibility problems — and what signals indicate performance.Carmen Lauber is the prosecution's key witness. She testified she obtained fentanyl for Kouri multiple times before Eric Richins died. But she was using methamphetamine during the relevant period. She received immunity from Summit County, Salt Lake County, and the federal government. Her own supplier, Robert Crozier, originally told detectives he sold fentanyl — but testified Friday it was oxycodone, blaming his original statement on being "detoxing and out of it."The defense is hammering every inconsistency. The prosecution needs the jury to believe her anyway. Dreeke explains how to assess whether a witness like Lauber is telling the truth despite the baggage — versus constructing a narrative that serves her immunity deal.He also reads Kouri's behavior. Nearly four years of maintaining innocence through investigation, arrest, hearings, and now trial. Sustained composure through testimony describing how she allegedly murdered her husband. What does that level of performance require psychologically — and where do the cracks show?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #CarmenLauber #RobertCrozier #MurderTrial #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers

The Kouri Richins trial brings Brooke Karrington, Forensic Accountant, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The calls to remove Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos have grown louder since the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie thrust his department into the national spotlight. But the people demanding action may not realize how few options actually exist. Nanos won reelection by just 481 votes in 2024. The Board of Supervisors has requested two separate outside investigations. Deputies within his own department voted no confidence. And yet, under Arizona law, removing an elected sheriff between elections is one of the hardest things to accomplish in American government.In this episode, we lay out the three paths that theoretically exist and explain why each one hits a wall. A recall election would require over 121,000 verified signatures collected in just 120 days — a logistical mountain with no existing infrastructure to support it. Criminal prosecution has been explored twice through Attorney General referrals, with one investigation closing without charges and the other producing no public action. And impeachment, the mechanism people invoke most often, simply does not apply to county officers under the Arizona Constitution. The legislature cannot impeach a sheriff. The governor cannot remove a sheriff. The Board of Supervisors cannot remove a sheriff. This is a constitutional reality rooted in Arizona's founding principles, and it affects every county in the state.Whether you support Nanos or want him gone, this episode is about the system — what it allows, what it doesn't, and what that means for the Guthrie investigation and beyond.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCountySheriff #TrueCrimeToday #RecallElection #ArizonaLaw #SheriffRemoval #SavannahGuthrie #Tucson #LawEnforcement

Monday's testimony in the Kouri Richins murder trial wasn't about what witnesses remembered — it was about what the phones recorded. And the prosecution made sure the jury saw all of it.Chris Kotrodimos, a digital forensic expert retained by the Summit County Attorney's Office, walked jurors through data from seven devices and phone records. Kouri's white iPhone showed hundreds of deleted texts, calls, and web history during January through mid-March 2022 — the precise window of the alleged fentanyl purchases and Eric's death. Eric's phone showed no such deletions. Google searches from Kouri's replacement device included how to remotely wipe an iPhone, whether cops can compel lie detectors, life insurance payout timelines, luxury prison accommodations, and her own net worth.Three deleted meme thumbnails were recovered from the morning Eric died. Phone data showed Kouri's device active fifteen minutes before she dialed 911. Valentine's Day records captured her texting her alleged boyfriend while Eric reported feeling sick. Cell tower mapping placed Lauber and Crozier at the same location on the three dates of the alleged drug deals — the only three times Lauber's phone ever went there.Former Chief Medical Examiner Erik Christensen testified Eric was given fentanyl by someone else and that counterfeit fentanyl pills sold as oxycodone are widespread. Allison Wright told the jury Kouri said she felt "trapped" in 2019. The defense challenged the digital analysis and highlighted untested forensic options. Kouri Richins is presumed innocent. But the digital record the jury saw Monday tells its own story.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #GoogleSearches #FentanylMurder #TrueCrimeToday #PhoneEvidence #TrueCrime #SummitCounty #MurderTrial

Sheriff Nanos says one thing. Federal sources say another. The evidence went to Florida instead of Quantico. The crime scene was released before the FBI secured it. The doorbell footage timeline is disputed. For four weeks, the Nancy Guthrie investigation has been criticized as uniquely dysfunctional. Robin Dreeke — who spent 21 years inside the FBI — says this is what most investigations look like. The dysfunction isn't unusual. The visibility is.Dreeke served as Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He's been inside multi-agency cases where jurisdictional friction, evidence disputes, and contradictory public messaging were the norm, not the exception. The only difference with Guthrie is scale of attention. Every decision gets second-guessed in real time. Every contradiction gets amplified. Every resource shift gets interpreted as surrender.The specific criticisms have been constant. Reporters photographed blood on Nancy's front stoop before federal agents secured the property. The home was released, then re-warranted multiple times. DNA samples at the private lab have reportedly hit "challenges." Federal sources accused Nanos of blocking evidence access. Nanos pushed back publicly. Neither side has clarified the footage timeline dispute.Dreeke addresses whether any of this actually impacts outcomes — or whether it's the kind of friction that exists on every major case but usually stays invisible. When Pima County scales back to core detectives and the FBI moves operations to Phoenix, does that signal failure? Or is it the standard transition when an initial surge doesn't produce an arrest? The answer depends on understanding what baseline investigative dysfunction actually looks like.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCounty #HiddenKillersLive #Investigation #TrueCrime #TucsonKidnapping

The endless analysis of the Nancy Guthrie suspect has focused on his apparent amateurism — the cheap backpack, the bad holster placement, the improvised camera obstruction. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke offers a corrective: this is what most criminals look like. We've just been conditioned by fiction to expect something else.Dreeke spent over two decades with the Bureau, including serving as Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He's seen the full spectrum of criminal operations — from trained intelligence officers to desperate opportunists. And most of what he's seen looks closer to this than to anything Hollywood produces.The expectation gap matters because it affects how everyone — investigators, media, public — interprets evidence. When footage doesn't match the fictional standard, people assume something's unusual. They look for explanations that aren't there. They misread desperation as stupidity or luck as skill.Dreeke addresses the uncomfortable reality that sloppy execution doesn't always mean quick capture. This suspect has evaded identification for four weeks despite massive resources, a $1.3 million reward, and round-the-clock national coverage. That's not necessarily sophistication. It might just be circumstance. But distinguishing between the two requires understanding what baseline criminal behavior actually looks like — and that baseline is far messier than most people realize.From his counterintelligence background, Dreeke explains what a genuinely professional operation would have done differently. The gap between tradecraft and what's on the Guthrie footage is real. But that gap exists in almost every case. This one just has cameras on it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #CriminalBehavior #TucsonArizona #Kidnapping #HiddenKillers

Chris Kotrodimos, Digital Forensics Expert, is cross-examined by the defense in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The Kouri Richins trial continues with  Chris Kotrodimos, Digital Forensics Expert, on the stand.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The family is split. The trial is coming. And the question remains: How did Rex Heuermann allegedly hide as LISK for thirty years?Today we break down the psychology of compartmentalization and what it reveals about the man prosecutors call the Gilgo Beach Killer. Rex Heuermann is charged with seven Long Island murders spanning 1993 to 2010. He's pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence.But what makes this case different is the family fracture. His ex-wife Asa Ellerup still calls him her "hero." She told Peacock documentary filmmakers: "I know what bad men are capable of doing. Not my husband. You have the wrong man."Their daughter Victoria sees it differently. According to producers, she now believes her father is "most likely the Gilgo Beach serial killer."How does the same man produce two opposite conclusions from the people who knew him best?According to forensic psychologist Scott Bonn, serial killers have "the ability to flip a switch and go from family man to sadistic killer." Dennis Rader, BTK, was a church council president. Gary Ridgway held a steady job for thirty-two years.Prosecutors allege LISK took it further. Every murder allegedly occurred when his family was out of town. Cell phone records allegedly place him with burner phones used to contact the Gilgo Four victims in every instance.Former FBI agent Robin Dreeke suggests predators often select partners who won't ask questions. If true, Asa wasn't foolish. She may have been chosen.The LISK trial begins September 2026. This is Part 1 of five.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachKiller #LISK #TrueCrimeToday #LongIslandSerialKiller #GilgoBeachMurders #GilgoFour #OceanParkway #SuffolkCounty #LongIslandMurders

The Kouri Richins trial brings Chris Kotrodimos, Digital Forensics Expert, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

Two significant cases warrant examination through listener-driven inquiry: the Nancy Guthrie disappearance and the Kouri Richins murder prosecution.The Guthrie investigation presents persistent questions four weeks post-disappearance. Despite substantial evidence collection—doorbell footage of a suspect, DNA from gloves recovered two miles from the scene, over fifty thousand tips—no identification has occurred. Questions address survival probability given the absence of ransom demands or contact, the genetic genealogy pathway for non-CODIS DNA matches, tip processing methodology at extreme volumes, the implications of failed pacemaker signal detection, and the statistical improbability of complete anonymity despite widespread facial image distribution.The Richins trial requires dual-perspective analysis given the competing narratives presented.Prosecution elements include: Carmen Lauber's testimony regarding four fentanyl transactions; Eric Richins' statements to family expressing belief that Kouri was attempting to poison him; a prior illness incident in Greece; digital evidence including searches for luxury incarceration facilities and lie detector protocols; detection of Kouri's prescription medication in Eric's system; and toxicology showing fentanyl at five times lethal concentration.Defense elements target foundational weaknesses: Lauber's admitted methamphetamine use during the relevant time period; evolving testimony that introduced fentanyl only after investigators disclosed cause of death; her supplier's sworn recantation; interrogation video showing investigators instructing Lauber to provide details ensuring conviction; nineteen negative fentanyl tests on household items; untested medication on the nightstand; destroyed potential evidence through dishwasher processing; missing interview recordings; and multi-year delays in evidence collection.The analytical questions address whether circumstantial prosecution evidence can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt when physical evidence shows significant gaps, and whether defense arguments regarding witness credibility and investigative deficiencies create sufficient reasonable doubt.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #CaseAnalysis #ListenerQA #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #InvestigativeAnalysis #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimeLaw #DualCaseExamination

The Kouri Richins trial brings Allison Wright, friend of Eric Richins, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The Kouri Richins case forces us to ask: How do smart, capable people end up with partners who allegedly want them dead?Eric Richins was hardworking, devoted to his sons, present. Prosecutors allege his wife was millions in debt, had a boyfriend, allegedly bought fentanyl—all while Eric believed he had a real marriage.How did he miss it? He didn't. He was targeted.This is Part 1 of "Surviving the Fog"—a psychological deep dive into coercive control. We're using the Kouri Richins case as a framework to examine patterns documented in abuse research, not to diagnose anyone.This episode examines love bombing—the overwhelming intensity that feels like fate. These personalities select their targets, study their wounds, and become exactly what they've been missing.The constant texting is surveillance disguised as devotion. The speed is entrapment disguised as passion. The soulmate feeling is a script, not fate.Trauma bonding hijacks your brain chemistry. The intermittent reinforcement creates addiction. You're not staying because you're weak—you're staying because your nervous system has been rewired.The person you fell in love with may have been a performance. And performances can't be sustained.Kouri Richins is presumed innocent until proven guilty. This is educational content.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #LoveBombing #SurvivingTheFog #NarcissisticAbuse #EricRichins #TraumaBonding #CoerciveControl #DomesticAbuse #TrueCrime

A Robert Crozier video is presented to the jury and Molly Crosswhite takes the stand in the Kouri Richins Trial. The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

The defense strategy in the Kouri Richins trial targets two primary vulnerabilities: witness credibility and physical evidence gaps. Their argument for reasonable doubt is methodical and substantial.Carmen Lauber's credibility faces systematic challenge. She admitted testing positive for methamphetamine during the precise time frame she claims she conducted fentanyl transactions—late January through early March 2022. She acknowledged her memory was impaired, telling investigators it was "messed up" and "foggy," and that she had "fried her brain" through decades of drug use. Her testimony evolved: initial statements referenced three pre-death drug purchases; later accounts became four. Critically, fentanyl entered her narrative only after investigators informed her of Eric Richins' cause of death.Her supplier, Robert Crozier, has submitted a sworn affidavit recanting his original statement, now claiming he provided only oxycontin—never fentanyl—and that cognitive impairment during detox affected his initial interview. If the alleged source of the murder weapon denies providing the murder weapon, the prosecution's foundational theory faces serious challenge.Interrogation methodology raises additional concerns. Video evidence showed investigators telling Lauber that avoiding prison required providing "the details that ensure Kouri gets convicted of murder." Statements like "this whole case depends on you" and instructions to "finish painting the picture" suggest potential witness coaching rather than neutral information gathering.Physical evidence deficiencies compound credibility issues. Nineteen items tested for fentanyl—all negative. The hydrocodone bottle on the victim's nightstand remains untested. The alleged delivery mechanism—Moscow mule glasses—was destroyed through dishwasher processing before collection. The toxicologist's finding of acetylfentanyl—a marker exclusive to illicit manufacture—potentially supports defense theories of self-ingestion rather than poisoning.Interview recordings are missing. The boyfriend's phones were returned and re-collected multiple times. Evidence collection occurred years post-mortem. The cumulative effect raises substantial reasonable doubt questions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #DefenseAnalysis #ReasonableDoubt #RichinsTrial #WitnessCredibility #EvidentiaryGaps #CarmenLauber #ForensicDeficiencies #TrueCrimeLaw #TrialAnalysis

The Kouri Richins trial brings Dr. Erik Christensen, Retired Medical Examiner, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime

It's no longer speculation. D4VD — the "Romantic Homicide" singer whose Tesla contained the dismembered remains of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez — has been officially designated as the target of a murder investigation.Unsealed court documents filed in Texas reveal the Los Angeles County DA's office identified David Anthony Burke as the target of its grand jury inquiry. The filings allege he "may be involved in having committed... One count of Murder." DA Nathan Hochman confirmed the allegation. Deputy DA Beth Silverman is leading the prosecution.The documents became public after D4VD's family — father Dawud, mother Colleen, and brother Caleb — challenged subpoenas ordering them to testify. Texas courts denied their petitions. A temporary stay was granted on appeal, but not before the sealed filings were exposed.What those filings describe is horrific. Celeste's head and torso were found in a cadaver bag in the front trunk of D4VD's Tesla. Her severed arms and legs were in a second bag. The car had been abandoned in the Hollywood Hills since late July 2025. It was towed after neighbors reported a foul odor.The grand jury has heard from D4VD's manager, who admitted he didn't call police because he wanted the tour to continue. His friend Neo Langston was arrested in Montana for ignoring a subpoena. Investigators found a burn cage and chainsaw at the rental property. Police believe D4VD likely had help.Celeste went to see a movie with D4VD in April 2024 and never came home. She was last photographed alive January 2, 2025. She was 14 years old.D4VD has not been arrested or charged. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivas #TrueCrimeToday #MurderTarget #GrandJury #BethSilverman #JusticeForCeleste #LAPD #DavidAnthonyBurke #BreakingNews

Five days. Six witnesses on the drug supply question alone. Three immunity deals for one man. And not a single witness has confirmed under oath that Kouri Richins ever asked for, received, or possessed fentanyl. That's where Week 1 of the Kouri Richins murder trial lands as the jury heads into the weekend.Day 5 delivered the most damaging testimony yet for the prosecution's theory. Robert Crozier, the alleged original drug source, testified he sold Carmen Lauber oxycodone — not fentanyl — and that he had no fentanyl connection in early 2022. He said people were scared of fentanyl and dying from it. He contradicted Lauber on how many times they met and what he sold. He identified errors in his own affidavit and said the words in it weren't his.Carmen Lauber finished her second day of cross-examination with her credibility significantly damaged. She admitted her account changed from three purchases to four, that investigators led her through her interviews, and that Kouri never asked for fentanyl by name. She confirmed lying to detectives about her drug use and communicating with a co-witness under disputed probation conditions.Anna Isbell described overhearing Kouri ask about the "Michael Jackson drug" and assumed it was a muscle relaxer. Defense attorneys revealed texts showing a detective threatened Isbell with a warrant and a catch pole for her dog. Forensic testimony laid groundwork for upcoming digital evidence from four extracted cell phones.The prosecution has the toxicology — five times the fatal dose of fentanyl plus acetyl fentanyl in Eric Richins' blood. But after Week 1, the story of how it got there is fracturing. A mistrial motion was filed and denied. Four weeks remain. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #RichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #RobertCrozier #FentanylCase #SummitCounty #TrueCrime #MurderTrial

The prosecution's case against Kouri Richins relies on a combination of witness testimony, digital evidence, toxicology results, and circumstantial indicators of premeditation. Evaluating whether these elements establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt requires examining each component critically.Carmen Lauber's testimony places the alleged murder weapon—fentanyl—in Kouri Richins' hands through four separate transactions. The prosecution argues the "investor" cover story demonstrates consciousness of guilt. Lauber's additional testimony regarding a request for "the Michael Jackson stuff"—propofol, a hospital anesthetic unavailable through street channels—potentially indicates escalating desperation or planning beyond what the housekeeper could provide.The victim's own statements carry significant weight. Eric Richins allegedly told family members he believed his wife was trying to poison him, including a phone call weeks before his death. Testimony regarding a prior incident in Greece where Eric became violently ill after consuming a beverage Kouri prepared suggests potential pattern evidence. If the prosecution establishes prior attempts, premeditation becomes substantially more demonstrable.Toxicological findings present critical data points. Eric Richins had fifteen nanograms per milliliter of fentanyl—five times potentially lethal concentrations. Additionally, quetiapine—medication prescribed to Kouri, not Eric—was detected in his system. The presence of a spouse's prescription medication in a poisoning victim requires explanation.Digital evidence includes internet searches for "luxury prisons for the rich," "can cops force you to do a lie detector test," and "can cops recover deleted iPhone messages." Deleted text messages and phone activity during claimed sleep hours support prosecution theories of planning and concealment. The Valentine's Day sandwich allegation, insurance policy implications, and the boyfriend's potential knowledge round out the prosecution's narrative.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #ProsecutionAnalysis #RichinsTrial #EvidenceEvaluation #EricRichins #CarmenLauber #ToxicologyEvidence #DigitalForensics #TrueCrimeLaw #MurderTrial

The Nancy Guthrie case presents an investigative profile that defies conventional analysis. Four weeks after the 84-year-old's disappearance, investigators have substantial evidence—doorbell footage of a suspect, DNA recovered from gloves found two miles from the scene, over fifty thousand tips, and $1.3 million in combined rewards—yet no identification has been made and no arrest has occurred. The questions accumulating around this case warrant serious examination.The DNA recovered from the gloves did not produce a CODIS match. The investigative pathway forward likely involves genetic genealogy, but that process carries its own timeline considerations. How long does IGG typically take? What factors accelerate or delay results? Meanwhile, the volume of tips—fifty thousand—raises processing questions. What systems handle that volume? How are tips prioritized? Is it possible a credible lead remains buried in the queue?Nancy Guthrie's pacemaker contains Bluetooth technology with a detection range of approximately two hundred yards. Aerial searches specifically targeted that signal and found nothing. The implications vary: subterranean location, signal-blocking materials, device failure, or distance beyond search parameters. Each possibility carries different investigative and outcome implications.The suspect footage has received extensive media distribution, yet no identification has resulted. The statistical improbability of complete anonymity despite clear facial images raises questions about the suspect's social circumstances, geographic origin, or current status.Additional questions address the mixed DNA profile found inside the residence, the methodology used to dismiss ransom notes as opportunistic frauds, the timeline considerations for case status changes, and whether pattern analysis has connected this case to other incidents involving elderly victims or home invasions in the region.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #InvestigativeAnalysis #CriticalQuestions #GuthrieCase #TucsonMissing #DNAEvidence #GeneticGenealogy #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeLaw #CaseAnalysis

Three memes allegedly found on Kouri Richins' phone the morning her husband's body was removed. "I'm rich." Their three sons were still upstairs, unaware their father was dead.The Kouri Richins murder trial has opened with explosive allegations—and immediate credibility problems for the prosecution's key witnesses.Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth laid out the theory: $4.5 million in debt, an affair with Josh Grossman, Caribbean vacation plans for one month after Eric's death, nearly two million in life insurance allegedly taken out without his knowledge. A fifteen-minute gap before the 911 call—phone unlocked six times while Eric lay dead. Internet searches about women's prisons and lie detector tests.But the foundation is shaky. Carmen Lauber, the woman who claims she sold Kouri fentanyl, has been granted immunity—and allegedly changed her story only after police threatened prison time. Her own dealer signed an affidavit claiming he sold OxyContin, not fentanyl. The Moscow mule glasses Eric drank from were never tested. No pills were ever recovered. The house was never searched for fentanyl. The death certificate lists manner of death as unknown.Defense attorney Kathryn Nester played Kouri's 911 call for the jury—raw, sobbing, barely coherent. She painted Eric as a man struggling with Lyme disease, chronic pain, and painkiller dependence.Eighteen days before his death, Eric allegedly told friends he thought his wife tried to poison him. That testimony is still ahead.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down where this case can be won—and lost.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #CarmenLauber #FentanylPoisoning #15MinuteGap #BobMotta #UtahTrial #TrueCrime

Four hundred investigators. DNA recovered at the scene. Forty thousand tips processed. And still—no suspect. No vehicle. No names being investigated.The Nancy Guthrie investigation has reached an inflection point. Sources say operations may soon transition from surge mode to a smaller long-term task force. The family has been briefed. CODIS returned no match. Mixed DNA samples at a Florida lab are hitting obstacles. Two people were detained and released with no connection to the kidnapping. The backpack and gloves found near the scene led nowhere.There's tension in the official narrative. Some sources suggest the doorbell camera images may have been captured on different days—raising the possibility of prior surveillance. Pima County Sheriff's Department calls that theory "purely speculative." Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down what this evidence means legally and why the disconnect between official statements and leaks matters for any future prosecution.Then Savannah Guthrie announced the family is offering one million dollars for information leading to Nancy's "recovery." Combined with existing rewards, over 1.2 million dollars is now available. At that number, someone in the perpetrator's orbit starts doing math.Robin Dreeke ran FBI behavioral analysis for twenty-one years. He examines what happens psychologically when an investigation transitions from surge to sustained—the institutional recalibration, the pressure on command structures, and what historically makes someone with dangerous knowledge finally act.Someone knows. The reward is there. The DNA is processing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #MillionDollarReward #TucsonKidnapping #DNAEvidence #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #FBIBehavioral #TrueCrime

Nick Reiner pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder. The headlines wrote themselves. Most of them missed the point.In California criminal procedure, a not guilty plea at arraignment is a placeholder—not a declaration of innocence. If the defense intended to claim Nick didn't commit the killings, they'd say so. They didn't. What they're doing is preserving options while psychiatric evaluations continue and strategy crystallizes.Here's how California insanity defense works: if you want to claim you were legally insane at the time of the crime, you enter a dual plea—not guilty AND not guilty by reason of insanity. The court then bifurcates your trial. Phase one determines guilt. Phase two, if needed, determines sanity. The single not guilty plea suggests the defense hasn't committed to that path yet.Three doors remain open:M'Naghten insanity. Prove Nick didn't understand what he was doing or didn't know it was wrong. Legal experts are skeptical. He was reportedly arguing with his father at a party hours before the killings—suggesting awareness of conflict and context.Diminished actuality. Use his documented schizoaffective disorder and reported medication changes to argue he couldn't premeditate. This doesn't eliminate guilt—it reduces the charge. First-degree becomes second-degree or manslaughter.Incompetence to stand trial. Halt proceedings entirely until treatment restores Nick's ability to participate in his defense.Meanwhile, Jake, Romy, and Tracy Reiner face something the legal system has no category for: being mourners, crime victims, and the accused's family simultaneously. Sources say they've cut Nick off completely. Sources also say they oppose the death penalty. Whether prosecutors honor that preference remains to be seen.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #TrueCrimeToday #NotGuiltyPlea #CaliforniaLaw #InsanityDefense #LegalAnalysis #Parricide #HiddenKillers

Forty thousand tips. Four hundred investigators. Zero suspects identified.The Nancy Guthrie investigation has thrown massive resources at this case—and the evidentiary picture remains incomplete. The DNA at a Florida lab is hitting challenges with mixed samples. The backpack and gloves found near the scene led nowhere. No names are being actively investigated.But one revelation could prove crucial if they ever find their guy.Law enforcement sources confirmed the doorbell camera images span multiple visits. At least one image was captured on an earlier reconnaissance trip—the suspect without his backpack, apparently spooked by the camera. He came back with weeds to obscure it.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta explains why this matters for prosecution: prior visits establish premeditation. They prove planning. They transform the legal picture from impulse to intent. But there's tension in the official narrative—the Pima County Sheriff's Department calls this "purely speculative" while sources continue leaking details to major outlets.The reward has reached extraordinary levels. Savannah Guthrie announced one million dollars for information leading to Nancy's "recovery"—that specific word choice carries weight. Combined with existing rewards, over 1.2 million dollars is now on the table.Robin Dreeke ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He examines what happens when reward money reaches that threshold. Relationships crack. Loyalty has a price point. Someone in this perpetrator's orbit has noticed the behavioral changes—the stress, the fear, the inconsistencies.ABC News reports the case may scale back to a long-term task force. The family has been briefed that leads aren't panning out. What happens next—and what makes someone finally talk?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #Prosecution #DNAEvidence #Premeditation #RewardMoney #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillers

PTSD rates among domestic violence survivors match combat veterans. That's not metaphor. That's clinical data.The long shadow of coercive control doesn't end when the relationship does. The hypervigilance that kept you alive becomes a permanent setting. The amygdala stays stuck in overdrive. Triggers hide in ordinary moments—a certain phrase, a car that looks familiar, a knock at the door.According to the unsealed affidavit in the Tepe case, surveillance footage shows Michael McKee walking through the Tepes' yard while Monique was at a football game in Indianapolis. She left at halftime. There's no documented tip-off. Her body just knew.That's not paranoia. That's what years of alleged coercive control do to a human nervous system. And it's what this episode is about.We examine what life looks like after you escape an abusive relationship—the identity excavation that happens when the person who entered that relationship has been systematically disassembled. The question "who am I?" that hits when the controlling voice is gone but still echoes. The shame survivors carry that was installed by someone who needed them to believe they were the problem.We also talk to the people nobody talks to: the partners of survivors. People like Spencer Tepe who inherit the fear alongside the person they love. Family members and friends trying to understand why someone who's been free for years still checks the locks three times. That behavior isn't baggage. It's battle damage.Monique chose love again. She chose parenthood. She chose joy while carrying years of alleged terror. That's not foolishness. That's the most courageous thing a human being can do.You are what you build after. And building is a choice you can make today.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #MichaelMcKee #TrueCrimeToday #PTSD #CoerciveControl #SurvivorHealing #Hypervigilance #TepeCase #HiddenKillers

The prosecution has a credibility problem. And criminal defense attorney Bob Motta is here to explain exactly where it lives.Carmen Lauber—the housekeeper who claims she sold Kouri Richins fentanyl to poison her husband Eric—has been granted immunity in exchange for her testimony. But Robert Crozier, Lauber's alleged supplier, has recanted his statement. He now says whatever he sold wasn't fentanyl.No pills were ever recovered from the Richins home. No pills were ever tested. The physical drug evidence that should form the foundation of a poisoning prosecution was never collected.Bob Motta breaks down what that evidentiary gap means for both sides—and where the defense has genuine opportunity to create reasonable doubt.The state's case is circumstantial but substantial. Prosecutors allege Kouri took out nearly two million dollars in life insurance on Eric without his knowledge. They say her phone was unlocked six times in the fifteen minutes before she called 911—and that first responders noted Eric seemed like he had been dead a while. Eric's friends will testify he called them eighteen days before his death and said he believed his wife tried to poison him.That secondhand statement is devastating. Bob walks through how the defense approaches neutralizing it without attacking a dead man's friends—and whether it can be done.Then there's the orange notebook. Kouri allegedly wrote a "firsthand account" of Eric's death. Those self-authored, undated words could contradict other evidence in the case. Bob explains how defendants can be destroyed by their own writings in poisoning cases where forensic evidence is thin.This trial could go either way. Here's a defense attorney's roadmap of where the pressure points are and who has the advantage at each one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #DefenseStrategy #CarmenLauber #FentanylPoisoning #KouriRichinsTrial #ReasonableDoubt #HiddenKillers

The most dangerous moment in domestic violence isn't the abuse. It's the escape. Research consistently shows the period immediately following separation is when lethality risk spikes. The abuser isn't losing a partner — they're losing control. And for some, that loss demands correction. Sometimes years later.Monique Tepe left Michael McKee within seven months of cohabitation. She filed for divorce. She moved back to Ohio. She did everything we tell domestic violence victims to do. According to prosecutors, eight years later, McKee allegedly drove hundreds of miles to kill her and her husband Spencer in their home while their children slept nearby.This episode examines the real barriers that keep victims trapped — financial dependence, children as leverage, trauma bonding, the credibility gap — and why the legal system is designed to respond to events rather than the patterns that precede them. Coercive control isn't a crime in most U.S. states. Restraining orders work on people who respect legal boundaries. The system waits for the crisis. And by the time the crisis arrives, it's often too late.The question was never about Monique. The question is about a system that left her unprotected.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #MoniqueTepe #MichaelMcKee #SpencerTepe #WhyDidntSheLeave #DomesticViolence #CoerciveControl #LethalityRisk #TepeCase #SystemFailure

The evidence in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping doesn't read like a solo operation.Weeks of apparent reconnaissance—but no coherent extraction plan. Forensic awareness at the point of entry—but a glove discarded two miles from the scene. Ransom notes containing insider-level details—but no viable collection mechanism ever established.Investigators aren't ruling out multiple actors. And if this was a partnership, behavioral science tells us something important: partnerships fracture under pressure. Someone breaks.Robin Dreeke ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He spent his career studying how people with dangerous knowledge eventually talk—and what pushes them to that decision. He joins True Crime Today to examine what the contradictory evidence suggests about the perpetrator profile and the psychology of the inevitable break.The investigation has reached a critical juncture. Sources say operations may transition from the four-hundred-investigator surge to a smaller long-term task force. Two people have been detained and released with no connection to the case. The DNA recovered at the scene produced no CODIS match. No vehicle has been identified. The family has cooperated fully and been briefed on the operational shift.But the pressure on whoever did this is mounting. The reward exceeds two hundred thousand dollars. Genetic genealogy teams are working the DNA. And somewhere in the perpetrator's life—a spouse, a coworker, a family member—someone has noticed the behavioral changes. The stress. The inconsistencies.Robin breaks down who that person typically is, what they're weighing, and what historically tips them from suspicion to action. Cases like this get solved when someone talks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #Accomplice #RobinDreeke #FBIBehavioral #RewardMoney #GeneticGenealogy #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillers

Weeks into the Nancy Guthrie investigation, the forensic picture is more complicated than the headlines suggest.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer assesses what investigators are actually working with—and it's not as clean as the public might assume.The DNA recovered inside the Nancy Guthrie home is a mixture still being separated. Family members, landscapers, service workers all contributed to the sample. Genetic genealogy can't begin until that profile is clean enough to upload. With questions about lab facilities and sample condition, the timeline remains uncertain.The glove found miles from the property? Processed through CODIS. No match to anyone in the system—and critically, no match to the DNA at the scene. Coffindaffer raises the possibility it shouldn't be treated as case evidence at all.Meanwhile: lost Nest camera footage. A pacemaker search running for weeks. Tens of thousands of tips. No suspect identified.But the pressure is building on whoever did this—and Robin Dreeke, former head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down what that pressure is doing to them right now.The reconnaissance windows suggest someone local. Someone who's been watching weeks of national coverage knowing genetic genealogy is processing, the FBI is showing photos at gun shops, and CeCe Moore told national TV the kidnapper should be "extremely concerned."What does that pressure do to someone trying to act normal? What behavioral tells might they be showing to people around them?The forensic awareness at the door suggests planning. The dropped glove suggests panic. Dreeke identifies the signature of someone who may be in over their head.This is the Nancy Guthrie investigation—where it actually stands.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #Coffindaffer #RobinDreeke #GeneticGenealogy #DNAEvidence #CODISMiss #TucsonKidnapping #CaseUpdate

Defense attorney Kathryn Nester came out swinging in opening statements of the Kouri Richins murder trial, systematically attacking the prosecution's evidence chain and the credibility of their key witness. The legal battle lines are now drawn for what could be a five-week trial with a woman's life hanging in the balance.Nester's strategy centers on Carmen Lauber, the woman who allegedly sold Kouri fentanyl. According to the defense, Lauber changed her story only after police threatened her with prison time. More damaging still: Lauber's own drug dealer later signed an affidavit claiming he sold her OxyContin, not fentanyl. If Lauber never had fentanyl, how could she have sold it to Kouri?The defense highlighted critical gaps in the investigation. The Moscow mule glasses Eric allegedly drank from on the night of his death were never tested for fentanyl. The Kamas home was never searched for the drug. The medical examiner's death certificate lists manner of death as unknown—not homicide.Nester painted Eric Richins as a man battling Lyme disease, chronic pain, and dependence on prescription painkillers—a profile that could explain fentanyl exposure through contaminated street drugs rather than deliberate poisoning. She played Kouri's 911 call for the jury: raw, sobbing, desperate.Prosecutor Brad Bloodworth countered with alleged memes found on Kouri's phone the morning Eric's body was removed, a fifteen-minute delay before calling 911, $4.5 million in debt, an affair with Josh Grossman, and internet searches about women's prisons and lie detector tests.Eric's sister Katie Richins-Benson testified about Kouri's allegedly cold, business-focused demeanor while the family grieved. The defense challenged her memory and noted the family invested $100,000 in a private investigator.Carmen Lauber and Josh Grossman testimony still to come.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #CarmenLauber #DefenseStrategy #FentanylEvidence #EricRichins #MurderTrial #CriminalDefense #ParkCity #TrueCrimeToday

You get out. The divorce is final. You're physically safe. And then one morning you're standing in your kitchen and a thought hits you that you weren't expecting: Who am I?Not "what do I do now." This is deeper. What do I actually like? What do I actually think? What do I actually want — not what keeps the peace, not what avoids punishment — what do I want? For someone coming out of coercive control, those questions can feel impossible. Because the person who entered that relationship has been systematically disassembled.True crime coverage talks about the abuse. The escape. The arrest. It almost never talks about what comes after — the healing, the identity work, the daily act of becoming yourself again after someone spent years trying to erase you.This episode honors what Monique Tepe built after her marriage to Michael McKee. She chose Spencer. She chose parenthood. She chose joy while carrying fear. And she did it knowing — according to family — that the threat had never fully gone away.We cover what recovery actually looks like: the identity excavation, the role of therapy and its accessibility barriers, the shame that doesn't belong to survivors, and the community of people carrying the same silence. This episode speaks directly to anyone still rebuilding after what happened to them.You are not what happened to you. You are what you build after.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TrueCrimeToday #MoniqueTepe #SpencerTepe #MichaelMcKee #WhoAmINow #HealingAfterAbuse #CoerciveControl #SurvivorIdentity #TepeCase #YouAreWhatYouBuildAfter

The Kouri Richins trial brings Robert Crozier, Former Drug Dealer, to the stand in this segment.The Kouri Richins murder trial continues in Utah as the state prosecutes the children's book author for allegedly poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl. Prosecutors allege she killed him for insurance money after secretly increasing his policy to $1.9 million. The defense maintains Eric died from accidental drug use.True Crime Today delivers real-time trial coverage as it happens—key testimony, critical cross-examinations, and the moments that matter. No waiting for nightly recaps. Watch the case unfold live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeToday #LiveTrial #EricRichins #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #CourtTV #TrialWatch #BreakingCrime