Podcasts about Breaking news

In this episode of the MeidasTouch Podcast, we break down Trump's disastrous indoor inauguration, which he tried to blame on the cold while being surrounded by oligarchs in what was the weakest swearing-in ceremony in history. Meanwhile, Trump says people don't care about inflation, even as prices soar and MAGA Mike Johnson admits Republicans have no real plan to fix it. Over at the fake government agency DOGE, Vivek Ramaswamy has already been forced out, and the agency is getting sued. Then there's the Trump MEME Coin debacle, where Trump launched a crypto meme coin right before his inauguration, only for Melania to release her own competing coin, crashing both and leaving his supporters holding the bag. Plus, Trump's phony “Day 1” promise to bring peace to Ukraine falls flat, and we expose the bizarre TikTok stunt where Trump and TikTok pretended to shut the app down for a day so he could take credit for “saving” it. Spoiler: It didn't work. Ben, Brett and Jordy break it all down. Subscribe to Meidas+ at https://meidasplus.com Watch Ben's interview with President Biden: https://youtu.be/TJfOAjUleTc Deals from our sponsors!  VIIA: Try VIIA Hemp! https://viia.co/MEIDAS and use code MEIDAS! Americans United: Join in the fight: https://AU.org/meidas Ollie Pet Food: Head to https://Ollie.com/meidas and use promo code: MEIDAS to receive 60% OFF your FIRST BOX of meals when you subscribe today! Hiya Health: Go to https://hiyahealth.com/MEIDAS and get your kids the full-body nourishment they need to grow into healthy adults. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(0:00) The final hour opens with the callers weighing in on all that the guys have discussed on the show. (14:12) Has Travis Kelce passed Rob Gronkowksi on the all-time Tight End list? Plus, Breaking News that the Patriots have hired Josh McDaniels as their Offensive Coordinator. (29:23) Reacting to the breaking news that the Patriots have hired Josh McDaniels as the offensive coordinator of the team. (39:02) The Final Word!

Tom Pelissero talks Bears' hiring of Ben Johnson fresh off the breaking news (Hour 2) full 2582 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:16:27 +0000 OBV4AaLxK441PSzNhOBqnnyrJ30FWdXz sports Spiegel & Holmes Show sports Tom Pelissero talks Bears' hiring of Ben Johnson fresh off the breaking news (Hour 2) Matt Spiegel and Laurence Holmes bring you Chicago sports talk with great opinions, guests and fun. Join Spiegel and Holmes as they discuss the Bears, Blackhawks, Bulls, Cubs and White Sox and delve into the biggest sports storylines of the day. Recurring guests include Bears cornerback Jaylon Johnson, former Bears coach Dave Wannstedt, former Bears center Olin Kreutz, Cubs manager Craig Counsell, Cubs second baseman Nico Hoerner and MLB Network personality Jon Morosi. Catch the show live Monday through Friday (2 p.m. - 6 p.m. CT) on 670 The Score, the exclusive audio home of the Cubs and the Bulls, or on the Audacy app. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https:/

Chase and Bill and some breaking news for the Podcast and they preview ALL of the events for both Team and Indi for the 2025 TYR Wodapalooza Miami!

The situation Diddy finds himself in is not getting better anytime soon, especially considering the massive amount of evidence that was collected by the Feds during the raid on Diddy's properties.   According to sources, not only was the CCTV system tapped into, the hard drive from multiple computers was seized as well as documents that were removed from a safe (s). In this episode, we get an update on the latest developments and breakdown where things might go from here.(commercial at 16:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsourcce:Diddy's LA home surveillance footage SEIZED by federal agents amid sex trafficking probe - as lawsuit alleges rapper 'paid Instagram model Jade Ramey stipend for sex work' |

Michael Reiter is the former Chief of Police for the Town of Palm Beach, Florida, and played a pivotal role in the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities. Under his leadership, the Palm Beach Police Department launched a probe into allegations that Epstein was sexually abusing underage girls at his Palm Beach mansion. Reiter's team gathered substantial evidence, including witness testimonies and physical evidence, exposing a pattern of exploitation. Frustrated by what he viewed as lenient treatment of Epstein by prosecutors, including the controversial plea deal brokered by federal attorneys, Reiter took the unprecedented step of bypassing local authorities and forwarding the case to the FBI. His efforts were instrumental in bringing national attention to Epstein's crimes, though they also highlighted systemic failures in the justice system. Reiter's actions are widely regarded as a courageous stand against powerful interests.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24-cr-542), Mr. Combs' defense team has filed a reply memorandum to bolster their request for an evidentiary hearing. They argue that government agents, particularly from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have engaged in misconduct by leaking confidential grand jury materials and investigative information to the media. The defense contends that these leaks have led to prejudicial pre-trial publicity, undermining Mr. Combs' right to a fair trial. They cite specific instances, such as the public dissemination of a 2016 videotape from the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles, which they allege was leaked by government agents to CNN.The defense requests the court to grant an evidentiary hearing to investigate these alleged leaks and to determine the extent of government misconduct. They also seek discovery of emails, documents, and records related to the leaks, a gag order to prevent further unauthorized disclosures, and suppression of any evidence obtained through these alleged violations. The defense emphasizes that without a hearing, the full scope of the abuse will remain unknown, and they urge the court to exercise its authority to prohibit such tactics that undermine a defendant's right to a fair trial.(comercial at 7:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628424.64.0.pdfshow less

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), spearheaded an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's extensive criminal network and activities within the territory. Her investigation revealed that Epstein used the USVI as a base for his illicit operations, including human trafficking and financial misconduct, facilitated through his private islands, Little St. James and Great St. James. George's efforts led to a significant lawsuit against Epstein's estate, seeking accountability for the exploitation that occurred under his ownership. Her investigation exposed ties between Epstein and various financial institutions that allegedly enabled his crimes, including a high-profile settlement with JPMorgan Chase, which was accused of failing to report suspicious activities. Despite her progress, George faced political backlash and was removed from her position shortly after filing the lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, raising questions about the influence of powerful interests in the case.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

The dispute between Sean "Diddy" Combs and prosecutors regarding the alleged "freak-off tapes" has become a contentious aspect of the legal proceedings against the music mogul. Prosecutors claim the tapes, purportedly depicting illicit and non-consensual acts involving underage individuals, are critical evidence in their case. They argue that the tapes corroborate witness testimonies about Diddy's alleged involvement in sexual misconduct and human trafficking. Prosecutors have emphasized that the tapes reveal a pattern of exploitation central to their charges and have sought to include them as key evidence, citing their relevance to proving Diddy's intent and involvement in criminal activities.Diddy's legal team, however, has vehemently opposed the inclusion of the tapes, arguing they are prejudicial and lack sufficient authentication. His attorneys have accused prosecutors of sensationalizing the case by focusing on the tapes to sway public opinion and taint the jury pool. They contend that the tapes were obtained unlawfully and do not definitively link Diddy to any criminal behavior. The defense has filed motions to exclude the tapes from evidence, maintaining that their introduction would violate his right to a fair trial. The legal back-and-forth highlights the high stakes and intense scrutiny surrounding the case, with both sides battling over the admissibility and implications of the tapes.(commercial at 8:40)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsoruce:Top attorney reveals the REAL reason Diddy's legal team is demanding access to Cassie Ventura sex tapes | Daily Mail Online

In United States v. Sean Combs, 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government submitted declarations in response to Judge Subramanian's January 3, 2025 order (Dkt. No. 123) and to further oppose the defendant's motion for a hearing and other relief (Dkt. No. 117). These submissions aim to provide additional evidence and arguments supporting the Government's position that the defendant's requests for a hearing and related relief are unwarranted. The declarations address key points raised in the defense's motion, reinforcing the Government's stance and compliance with procedural requirements outlined by the court.In United States v. Sean Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), the defense responded to the government's request for redactions to their January 14, 2025 letter motion (Dkts. 126, 127). Although the defense refiled the motion with the requested redactions as directed by the Court (Dkt. 128, 129), they opposed the redactions, arguing that they are overly broad and violate the presumption of public access to judicial documents. The defense seeks the Court's permission to refile the letter motion with narrower redactions to better balance transparency and confidentiality.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 Combs Letter re Redactions (AS comments) AE (002)gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.131.0.pdf

The Sinaloa Cartel, once a unified and dominant force in Mexico's drug trade, is currently embroiled in a violent internal conflict between two primary factions: "Los Chapitos," led by the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, and "La Mayiza," loyal to Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada. This infighting intensified following the July 2024 arrests of Zambada and Joaquín Guzmán López in El Paso, Texas, which created a power vacuum and escalated tensions between the groups. The conflict erupted on September 9, 2024, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, and has since spread to other municipalities, resulting in over 500 deaths and numerous disappearances.The violence has severely impacted daily life in Sinaloa, particularly in Culiacán, where residents face constant threats of abduction and murder. Cartel gunmen have been known to stop individuals, demand access to their cellphones, and execute them if any contact with rival faction members is found. This has led to widespread fear, with businesses closing, economic activity stalling, and families fleeing the area. Despite the deployment of additional military forces, the government's efforts have been insufficient to curb the violence, leaving citizens feeling unprotected and the region in a state of chaos.In the ongoing conflict between factions of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, a grim tactic has emerged: the desecration of rival families' mausoleums. Notably, the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, known as "Los Chapitos," are suspected of ordering the destruction of elaborate tombs belonging to the family of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder of the cartel. In early January 2025, a mausoleum near Culiacán, built for one of El Mayo's grandchildren, was ransacked and set ablaze. Days later, assailants returned to inflict further damage and reportedly removed the remains of several Zambada relatives. This act of grave desecration underscores the deepening enmity between cartel factions and represents a stark departure from traditional codes of conduct, where even rival groups typically respected burial sites.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:A grim new tactic in Sinaloa's cartel war: Grave desecration - Los Angeles Times

Step into a chilling narrative as we revisit New Year's Eve 2025 in New Orleans, where vibrant celebrations on Bourbon Street masked a looming threat. This episode dives deep into the tragic events surrounding the Bourbon Street Attack, orchestrated by veteran Shamsud-Din Jabbar, which resulted in the devastating loss of 14 lives. Join Margot as she reports on the investigation, drawing from publicly available information released by the FBI, coupled with insights from credible news sources. Discover the events leading up to that fateful night, the intricate details of the investigation, and the profound impact of this tragedy had on the community. Tune in for a compelling blend of storytelling and analysis that sheds light on one of the most harrowing incidents in recent memory. Don't miss this important episode that emphasizes the significance of vigilance and the resilience of a city forever changed. ——- Thank you to today's sponsor:  Acorns: Visit acorns.com/ to start investing today! If you would like to sponsor an episode, please reach out to militarymurderpodcast@gmail.com.  ——- Ways to support your favorite podcast: Join My Patreon Family! Subscribe to Military Murder Premium on Apple Podcast! Rate/Review the Show! Tell a Friend about Military Murder —— Military Murder is a military true crime podcast that focuses on murders committed by military members, veterans, and sometimes their family members.  ---- Follow on social: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@mamamargot  TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@militarymargot  Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/militarymurderpodcast  Discussion Group: https://facebook.com/groups/militarytruecrime  Email: militarymurderpodcast@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bridget Bernadette Phillips, a 22-year-old graduate student at Johns Hopkins University, was brutally murdered on March 22, 1989, in her off-campus Baltimore apartment. Bridget, who was studying Medieval and Byzantine history, was found bludgeoned to death near the entrance of her apartment, with no signs of robbery or sexual assault. Investigators collected forensic evidence, including hairs under her fingernails and a bloody shoe print, but despite early leads, the case went cold and remains unsolved to this day. The ferocity of the attack suggested a personal motive, but no suspects were ever definitively identified.Samantha Sayers, a 28-year-old experienced hiker, disappeared on August 1, 2018, while hiking Vesper Peak in the North Cascades of Washington. Despite an extensive search involving helicopters, drones, search dogs, and hundreds of volunteers, no trace of her has ever been found. Theories surrounding her disappearance range from a fall in the rugged terrain to getting lost, while some speculate about foul play. Samantha's family, particularly her mother, Lisa Sayers, and her boyfriend, Kevin Dares, have continued private search efforts, though no new evidence has emerged. As of the most recent updates, her case remains unsolved, leaving friends, family, and the public searching for answers in one of Washington's most baffling missing person cases.(commercial at 7:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

Maura Murray is a young woman who disappeared under mysterious circumstances in 2004. Here is a summary of her case:Background: Maura Murray was a 21-year-old nursing student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She was known for her athleticism, having been a track star in high school.Disappearance: On February 9, 2004, Maura packed her car and drove from Massachusetts to New Hampshire without telling anyone where she was going or why. She crashed her car on Route 112 in Haverhill, New Hampshire, but was gone by the time authorities arrived. Despite extensive searches, no trace of Maura has been found since.Investigations and Theories: There have been numerous theories about what happened to Maura, including the possibility of foul play, a voluntary disappearance, or an accident followed by her getting lost in the wilderness. Her case has generated significant media attention and numerous amateur sleuths have taken an interest in it.Family and Public Interest: Maura's family has been heavily involved in the search for her and keeping her case in the public eye. The case has been the subject of several books, podcasts, and television documentaries.Timothy Pitzen, a six-year-old boy from Aurora, Illinois, disappeared in May 2011 after his mother, Amy Fry-Pitzen, took him on a multi-day trip to zoos and waterparks before taking her own life in a Rockford motel. In her suicide note, Amy claimed that Timothy was "safe" with someone who loved him and that he would never be found. Despite extensive searches and investigations by law enforcement, including retracing Amy's steps and analyzing her last communications, Timothy has never been located, leaving behind a haunting mystery. Over a decade later, the case remains unsolved, with no confirmed sightings of Timothy and no conclusive evidence of his fate. His father, James Pitzen, continues to hold out hope that his son is still alive, as investigators maintain an open case, using advanced technology and updated images to try and locate Timothy. The disappearance remains one of the most perplexing missing person cases in modern history, a painful story of loss and lingering uncertainty.(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Joe Rogan has spoken extensively about Jeffrey Epstein across various episodes of his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience. Rogan has often expressed skepticism and outrage over the circumstances surrounding Epstein's wealth, his crimes, and his mysterious death. He frequently discusses the alleged connections between Epstein and powerful figures in politics, business, and entertainment, questioning how Epstein managed to escape scrutiny for so long. Rogan has described Epstein as emblematic of a deeply corrupt system, suggesting that his private island, "Lolita Island," and the activities there reflect a broader web of influence and exploitation. He has also raised doubts about the official narrative of Epstein's death, often referencing conspiracy theories that allege foul play, including claims that Epstein was murdered to prevent him from revealing information about high-profile individuals.Rogan's commentary often ventures into the implications of Epstein's connections and their impact on public trust in institutions. He has discussed Epstein's ties to figures such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew, highlighting the lack of accountability for those who may have been complicit or associated with Epstein's actions. Rogan has criticized mainstream media for not investigating these connections more thoroughly, framing the Epstein case as indicative of systemic corruption and elite impunity. Overall, Rogan's discussions on Epstein emphasize the bizarre and unsettling nature of the case, reflecting broader concerns about secrecy and unchecked power among the world's elite.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Guest: Dr. Joel Gator, Integrative Pediatrician, How to talk to your kids about wildfires. UnweddingsSharyl Lee Ralph. Dating Tips for Short Stature men8:45 Segment 8: Break Ups.

The prosecution in Florida knew that Jeffrey Epstein had other victims in New York and chose to go ahead with the plea deal anyway, shutting down any chance for that survivor from New York to speak with the grand jury even though this information was readily available to them.Let's take a look.(commercial at 11:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://abcnews.go.com/US/exclusive-florida-feds-knew-york-victim-epstein-indictment/story?id=69088738Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Denise George, the former Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), spearheaded an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's extensive criminal network and activities within the territory. Her investigation revealed that Epstein used the USVI as a base for his illicit operations, including human trafficking and financial misconduct, facilitated through his private islands, Little St. James and Great St. James. George's efforts led to a significant lawsuit against Epstein's estate, seeking accountability for the exploitation that occurred under his ownership. Her investigation exposed ties between Epstein and various financial institutions that allegedly enabled his crimes, including a high-profile settlement with JPMorgan Chase, which was accused of failing to report suspicious activities. Despite her progress, George faced political backlash and was removed from her position shortly after filing the lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, raising questions about the influence of powerful interests in the case.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we take a look at the DOJ and their internal report over the handling of Epstein's investigation and sentencing. Spoiler alert: Nobody was held responsible. (Commercial at 26:57)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article247149291.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew said in the BBC newsnight interview that he broke off all contact with Jeffrey Epstein after their picture together in Central Park. However, according to newly released Emails from JP Morgan, that doesn't seem to be the case.In this episode, we take a look at Prince Andrew's relationship with the truth when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein and how he stayed in contact with him after saying that he was breaking off all ties to the convicted offender.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew may have kept in touch with Jeffrey Epstein (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Michael Reiter is the former Chief of Police for the Town of Palm Beach, Florida, and played a pivotal role in the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities. Under his leadership, the Palm Beach Police Department launched a probe into allegations that Epstein was sexually abusing underage girls at his Palm Beach mansion. Reiter's team gathered substantial evidence, including witness testimonies and physical evidence, exposing a pattern of exploitation. Frustrated by what he viewed as lenient treatment of Epstein by prosecutors, including the controversial plea deal brokered by federal attorneys, Reiter took the unprecedented step of bypassing local authorities and forwarding the case to the FBI. His efforts were instrumental in bringing national attention to Epstein's crimes, though they also highlighted systemic failures in the justice system. Reiter's actions are widely regarded as a courageous stand against powerful interests.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2024, a 29-year-old independent music artist filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that he raped her during a December 2022 party in New York City. According to the complaint, the artist attended the event to network within the music industry. She claims that Combs invited her to a private area, where she was given a drink that caused her to feel disoriented. The lawsuit alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her while she was incapacitated. After the incident, the plaintiff asserts that she experienced significant emotional and psychological distress, impacting her personal and professional life. She is seeking damages for the alleged assault and its subsequent effects.This accusation is part of a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who has been accused by multiple individuals of sexual misconduct spanning several decades. In response to these allegations, Combs' legal team has consistently denied any wrongdoing, labeling the claims as false and opportunistic. The mounting lawsuits have intensified public scrutiny of Combs' conduct and have raised broader discussions about accountability within the entertainment industry. As these cases proceed through the legal system, they are expected to have significant implications for all parties involved.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Maura Murray is a young woman who disappeared under mysterious circumstances in 2004. Here is a summary of her case:Background: Maura Murray was a 21-year-old nursing student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She was known for her athleticism, having been a track star in high school.Disappearance: On February 9, 2004, Maura packed her car and drove from Massachusetts to New Hampshire without telling anyone where she was going or why. She crashed her car on Route 112 in Haverhill, New Hampshire, but was gone by the time authorities arrived. Despite extensive searches, no trace of Maura has been found since.Investigations and Theories: There have been numerous theories about what happened to Maura, including the possibility of foul play, a voluntary disappearance, or an accident followed by her getting lost in the wilderness. Her case has generated significant media attention and numerous amateur sleuths have taken an interest in it.Family and Public Interest: Maura's family has been heavily involved in the search for her and keeping her case in the public eye. The case has been the subject of several books, podcasts, and television documentaries.Timothy Pitzen, a six-year-old boy from Aurora, Illinois, disappeared in May 2011 after his mother, Amy Fry-Pitzen, took him on a multi-day trip to zoos and waterparks before taking her own life in a Rockford motel. In her suicide note, Amy claimed that Timothy was "safe" with someone who loved him and that he would never be found. Despite extensive searches and investigations by law enforcement, including retracing Amy's steps and analyzing her last communications, Timothy has never been located, leaving behind a haunting mystery. Over a decade later, the case remains unsolved, with no confirmed sightings of Timothy and no conclusive evidence of his fate. His father, James Pitzen, continues to hold out hope that his son is still alive, as investigators maintain an open case, using advanced technology and updated images to try and locate Timothy. The disappearance remains one of the most perplexing missing person cases in modern history, a painful story of loss and lingering uncertainty.(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bridget Bernadette Phillips, a 22-year-old graduate student at Johns Hopkins University, was brutally murdered on March 22, 1989, in her off-campus Baltimore apartment. Bridget, who was studying Medieval and Byzantine history, was found bludgeoned to death near the entrance of her apartment, with no signs of robbery or sexual assault. Investigators collected forensic evidence, including hairs under her fingernails and a bloody shoe print, but despite early leads, the case went cold and remains unsolved to this day. The ferocity of the attack suggested a personal motive, but no suspects were ever definitively identified.Samantha Sayers, a 28-year-old experienced hiker, disappeared on August 1, 2018, while hiking Vesper Peak in the North Cascades of Washington. Despite an extensive search involving helicopters, drones, search dogs, and hundreds of volunteers, no trace of her has ever been found. Theories surrounding her disappearance range from a fall in the rugged terrain to getting lost, while some speculate about foul play. Samantha's family, particularly her mother, Lisa Sayers, and her boyfriend, Kevin Dares, have continued private search efforts, though no new evidence has emerged. As of the most recent updates, her case remains unsolved, leaving friends, family, and the public searching for answers in one of Washington's most baffling missing person cases.(commercial at 7:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)

Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok are back for a new update at the intersection of law and politics on the Legal AF podcast. On tonight's show, they cover: 1) MAGA voters having second thoughts and voters' remorse and how that plays into the Democrats hands; 2) Trump lining his own pocket on the eve of his presidency rather than helping the American people; 3) MAGA judges threatening to deport the "Dreamers,: 4) the 40 or so last minute Executive Orders of President Biden to Trump proof democracy and Biden's legacy; 5) and update on the Mar a Lago and TikTok cases, and so much more at the intersection of law and politics. Support our Sponsors: Uplift: Elevate your workspace and energize your year with Uplift Desk. Go to https://upliftdesk.com/legalaf for a special offer exclusive to our audience. Manukora: Head to https://manukora.com/legalaf to receive $25 off your starter kit today! Prolon: Head to https://ProlonLife.com/LEGALAF to get 15% off their 5-day nutrition program. Soul: Go to https://GetSoul.com and use code LEGALAF to get 30% OFF your order! Subscribe to the new Legal AF channel: https://youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN Subscribe to Meidas+ at https://meidasplus.com Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

MY tiktok channel is banned. What shall I do now? Come to my youtube!! CLICK HERE

In his further reply supporting the motion to dismiss Jane Roe's lawsuit, Garth Brooks contended that Roe's allegations were not only baseless but also strategically filed in California to circumvent ongoing legal proceedings in Mississippi. Brooks emphasized that he had initiated a defamation lawsuit against Roe in Mississippi prior to her California filing, accusing her of attempting to extort him with false claims. He argued that Roe's lawsuit was a retaliatory action designed to undermine his preemptive legal measures and to exploit California's legal system.Brooks' legal team asserted that the California court should dismiss Roe's lawsuit to prevent duplicative litigation and potential conflicting judgments between the two states. They maintained that the Mississippi court was the appropriate venue to adjudicate the disputes between the parties, given the pre-existing lawsuit and the substantial overlap in the issues presented. Despite these arguments, the California court denied Brooks' motion to dismiss without prejudice, opting to stay the proceedings pending the outcome of the Mississippi case.In December 2024, U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald denied Garth Brooks' motion to dismiss a sexual assault lawsuit filed against him by a former makeup artist, identified as Jane Roe. Brooks had sought dismissal on the grounds that a related defamation lawsuit he filed in Mississippi should take precedence. However, Judge Fitzgerald ruled that the California case would be stayed pending the outcome of the Mississippi proceedings, emphasizing that dismissal at this stage was inappropriate.The judge's decision underscores the complexity of concurrent legal actions in different jurisdictions. By staying the California proceedings, the court aims to prevent conflicting judgments and ensure a fair adjudication of the intertwined issues. Brooks is required to inform the California court of any developments in the Mississippi case within ten court days, highlighting the ongoing nature of this legal matter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.cacd.946930.28.0.pdfsource:gov.uscourts.cacd.946930.25.0.pdf

Jane Roe, a former makeup artist for Garth Brooks, filed an opposition to Brooks' motion to dismiss her sexual assault lawsuit in California. In her opposition, Roe contended that Brooks' attempt to dismiss the case was a strategic move to evade California's legal protections, specifically its anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statutes, which are designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits that intimidate or silence individuals exercising their legal rights. Roe's legal team argued that Brooks' preemptive defamation lawsuit filed in Mississippi was a form of "forum-shopping," intended to undermine her claims and deny her the protections afforded by California law.Roe's opposition emphasized that her allegations of sexual misconduct, including assault and battery, were serious claims that deserved to be heard in a California court, where the alleged incidents occurred. She maintained that dismissing her case in favor of Brooks' Mississippi lawsuit would unjustly disadvantage her and potentially suppress her pursuit of justice. The California court, acknowledging the complexities introduced by the concurrent Mississippi case, denied Brooks' motion to dismiss without prejudice and stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the related lawsuit in Mississippi. This decision allowed Roe's claims to remain active in California, awaiting further developments from the Mississippi court.(commercial at 8:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:

In November 2024, country music star Garth Brooks filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to dismiss a sexual assault and battery lawsuit brought against him by a former makeup artist, identified as Jane Roe. Brooks contended that Roe's claims should be dismissed or transferred to Mississippi, where a related lawsuit he initiated against her was already pending. He argued that the allegations were part of an extortion attempt and that the California court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.cacd.946930.12.0_1.pdf

In January 2002, 20-year-old Christopher Thompkins mysteriously vanished while working as a land surveyor in the woods near Ellerslie, Georgia. Walking just 50 feet behind his coworkers, he disappeared without a sound, leaving behind only a boot, scattered coins, and his tools near a barbed wire fence. Despite extensive searches using helicopters, dogs, and ground teams, no trace of him was ever found. Theories about his disappearance range from foul play and disorientation to supernatural or extraterrestrial involvement, yet none have been substantiated. Over 20 years later, his family continues to seek answers, but the case remains an unsolved enigma, haunting those involved and leaving behind one of Georgia's most baffling mysteries.The Jennifer Kesse case is a mysterious unsolved missing person case that began in January 2006. Jennifer Kesse was a 24-year-old woman living in Orlando, Florida. She disappeared under suspicious circumstances and has never been found.Here's a summary of the key details in the Jennifer Kesse case:Disappearance: Jennifer Kesse was last seen on the morning of January 24, 2006, when she left for work. She was a financial analyst and was expected at her workplace, but she never showed up. Her coworkers and family became concerned when they couldn't reach her.Abandoned Car: Jennifer's car, a black Chevy Malibu, was found abandoned at a nearby apartment complex a short distance from her home. It appeared to have been parked carefully, and her personal belongings, including her purse and cell phone, were missing. Surveillance footage from the complex showed an unknown person parking the car and walking away.Investigation: Law enforcement authorities conducted an extensive investigation, but the case went cold. Various leads and tips were followed, but no substantial breakthroughs occurred. The case was featured in the media, and a reward was offered for information, but Jennifer remained missing.Family Advocacy: Jennifer's family, particularly her parents, have been outspoken advocates for their daughter's case. They've worked tirelessly to keep the case in the public eye and to encourage potential witnesses to come forward with information.In this episode, we hear Jennifers story and how her family has never stopped fighting to try and bring her home.(commercial at 6:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:Chilling link between missing Jennifer Kesse and geologist Daniel Robinson as her uncle slams cops for 'ignoring' clue | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Bridget Bernadette Phillips, a 22-year-old graduate student at Johns Hopkins University, was brutally murdered on March 22, 1989, in her off-campus Baltimore apartment. Bridget, who was studying Medieval and Byzantine history, was found bludgeoned to death near the entrance of her apartment, with no signs of robbery or sexual assault. Investigators collected forensic evidence, including hairs under her fingernails and a bloody shoe print, but despite early leads, the case went cold and remains unsolved to this day. The ferocity of the attack suggested a personal motive, but no suspects were ever definitively identified.Samantha Sayers, a 28-year-old experienced hiker, disappeared on August 1, 2018, while hiking Vesper Peak in the North Cascades of Washington. Despite an extensive search involving helicopters, drones, search dogs, and hundreds of volunteers, no trace of her has ever been found. Theories surrounding her disappearance range from a fall in the rugged terrain to getting lost, while some speculate about foul play. Samantha's family, particularly her mother, Lisa Sayers, and her boyfriend, Kevin Dares, have continued private search efforts, though no new evidence has emerged. As of the most recent updates, her case remains unsolved, leaving friends, family, and the public searching for answers in one of Washington's most baffling missing person cases.(commercial at 7:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2015 Jean Luc Brunel attempted to sue Epstein over the damage his reputation received due to Epstein's behavior.In one of the most hypocritical attempts to divert attention I've seen in this case, Brunel tries to pin all his woes on his friendship with Epstein conveniently leaving out the many allegations that were directed at him.(commercial at 26:07)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.thedailybeast.com/model-king-sues-billionaire-perv-jeffrey-epsteinBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joe Rogan has spoken extensively about Jeffrey Epstein across various episodes of his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience. Rogan has often expressed skepticism and outrage over the circumstances surrounding Epstein's wealth, his crimes, and his mysterious death. He frequently discusses the alleged connections between Epstein and powerful figures in politics, business, and entertainment, questioning how Epstein managed to escape scrutiny for so long. Rogan has described Epstein as emblematic of a deeply corrupt system, suggesting that his private island, "Lolita Island," and the activities there reflect a broader web of influence and exploitation. He has also raised doubts about the official narrative of Epstein's death, often referencing conspiracy theories that allege foul play, including claims that Epstein was murdered to prevent him from revealing information about high-profile individuals.Rogan's commentary often ventures into the implications of Epstein's connections and their impact on public trust in institutions. He has discussed Epstein's ties to figures such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew, highlighting the lack of accountability for those who may have been complicit or associated with Epstein's actions. Rogan has criticized mainstream media for not investigating these connections more thoroughly, framing the Epstein case as indicative of systemic corruption and elite impunity. Overall, Rogan's discussions on Epstein emphasize the bizarre and unsettling nature of the case, reflecting broader concerns about secrecy and unchecked power among the world's elite.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In January 2025, rapper Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against his record label, Universal Music Group (UMG), alleging that the company promoted Kendrick Lamar's diss track "Not Like Us," which falsely accuses Drake of pedophilia. Drake contends that UMG prioritized profit over his safety and reputation, as the song's release allegedly led to violent incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto residence. He also claims that UMG employed bots and engaged in payola schemes to artificially inflate the track's popularity.UMG has denied these allegations, describing them as "offensive and untrue," and asserting that they would not undermine an artist they have heavily invested in. Legal experts suggest that proving defamation in this context may be challenging due to First Amendment protections of artistic expression. Some speculate that Drake's lawsuit could be a strategic move in his contract negotiations with UMG. The case underscores the complex interplay between artistic freedom and personal reputation in the music industry.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025.01.15 New Operative Defamation Complaint(9377666.8)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2024, a 29-year-old independent music artist filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that he raped her during a December 2022 party in New York City. According to the complaint, the artist attended the event to network within the music industry. She claims that Combs invited her to a private area, where she was given a drink that caused her to feel disoriented. The lawsuit alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her while she was incapacitated. After the incident, the plaintiff asserts that she experienced significant emotional and psychological distress, impacting her personal and professional life. She is seeking damages for the alleged assault and its subsequent effects.This accusation is part of a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who has been accused by multiple individuals of sexual misconduct spanning several decades. In response to these allegations, Combs' legal team has consistently denied any wrongdoing, labeling the claims as false and opportunistic. The mounting lawsuits have intensified public scrutiny of Combs' conduct and have raised broader discussions about accountability within the entertainment industry. As these cases proceed through the legal system, they are expected to have significant implications for all parties involved.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode...Virginia Roberts tweeted out that incredibly powerful and evil people want to silence her and that she fears for her well-being.She also pleads with her followers to keep the case alive in the event something happens to her.Why would a victim of Epstein's fear for her life? Who was involved with Epstein? Who protected him?(commercial at 8:44)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7779829/amp/Virginia-Roberts-posts-chilling-Twitter-message-claiming-Im-not-suicidal.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.