Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

The prosecution spent Day 7 connecting a gang title to a murder charge. A retired Compton Police Department detective took the stand and told the jury exactly where Duane "Keffe D" Davis sat in the hierarchy of the South Side Compton Crips.Robert Ladd tracked Davis and the gang for years. He identified Davis by a specific title — and explained to the jury what that title means when the gang acts. Tupac's childhood friend Malcolm Greenidge, court-ordered to testify, told the jury the shots came from the back seat of the white Cadillac. Davis was in the front. Ladd's testimony explains why the front seat carries the charge. He also testified about witnessing Orlando Anderson's gang initiation and the code of respect that drives retaliation.Crime scene analysts showed the jury what police found in Davis's Henderson home during a September 2023 search — his own book about the shooting and newspaper clippings about the murder stored in bins for decades.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TupacTrial #DuaneDavis #2Pac #TrueCrime #LasVegas #DeathRowRecords #JusticeForTupac

An FBI profiler thinks Lindsay Clancy is a psychopath who was sick of her kids. That's how one commenter puts it, citing Pat Brown, with Matt Walsh as a second vote. The commenter rejects both of them. She's closer to the record than the people she quoted.Pat Brown was never in the FBI. She's an independent, self-taught profiler with a criminal justice master's who has written that she felt too old to join the Bureau and built her own practice instead. She has posted videos arguing Lindsay fabricated her psychosis. Matt Walsh is a political commentator who wrote that the real source of Lindsay's depression was a selfish hatred of her children. Neither has examined her or testified."Sick of her kids" isn't a fringe idea, though. It's the prosecution's theory in plainer words. Prosecutors told the jury Lindsay was controlling and killed the children because she was no longer satisfied with her life. That's a claim being weighed, and the jury hasn't ruled on it."Psychopath" is something else entirely, and the difference is the whole trial. A psychopath knows exactly what's real and doesn't care. Psychosis means losing track of what's real. The defense experts diagnosed postpartum psychosis. The prosecution's experts rejected that and said major depression or bipolar II. No one who examined her, either side, said psychopath or personality disorder.This segment covers five comments about Patrick and the system. What he did in December 2022, dated by testimony. The five words he said when a nurse raised bipolar. The Manhattan move that happened exactly when the comment says it did. The thirteen medications, which are documented. And what happens to Lindsay under each verdict.Opinions about Patrick are fair. Credentials are checkable. Diagnoses come from the witness stand.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrueCrimePodcast #ClancyTrial #MassachusettsTrial

Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a forensic psychiatrist who works with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit, took the stand today in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her attorney, Kevin Reddington, is running an insanity defense built on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Reddington spent cross-examination taking Saathoff's testimony apart piece by piece. Saathoff admitted that on the 911 call, he never actually heard Clancy say she tried to kill herself — just grunts. That detail came from Patrick Clancy's account instead. Same story with the pills: Saathoff said he got the information about Clancy allegedly crushing medication straight from Patrick — nothing was ever tested to confirm it. Reddington then asked the obvious follow-up nobody had an answer for: how did the empty pill bottles end up in a drawer? Saathoff also conceded that a person in psychosis can generate false memories and misremember events entirely — which doesn't exactly help a case built on secondhand recollection. He testified he never reached out to Clancy's mother himself, relying only on the DA's office telling him she wouldn't talk.Prosecutors argue Clancy understood what she was doing despite the mental-health claims. After the killings, she allegedly attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window and is now paralyzed from the waist down. Husband Patrick Clancy, out running errands at the time, has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #Breaking

Kirk Heilbrun told twelve jurors that Lindsay Clancy is still grieving her children. That she spent months trying to get help. That she is not self-centered. That she used the words "I have lost everything, and I don't want to be here." He said he would not consider her a beast.Then he told those same twelve people that she's criminally responsible for killing Cora, Dawson, and Callan — and that her moral awareness was "influenced" by suicidal despair but never extinguished. He was paid $54,000 by the Commonwealth to reach that conclusion. His last encounter with a postpartum psychosis patient was forty-four years ago. Reddington attacked his credentials, his compensation, and his lack of published work on postpartum conditions.The prosecution's final witness, FBI psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, took a different approach — comparing Clancy's accounts across multiple interviews and finding discrepancies the defense will have to answer in closing. Clancy gave different timelines for when the voice started, and a detail about what the children were doing in the kitchen doesn't match the crime scene evidence. Closings expected Thursday.END_LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is standing trial for the murders of her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her defense, led by Kevin Reddington, is built around an insanity claim: severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Cross-examination is where the prosecution's expert stopped having it easy. Dr. Gregory Saathoff, the FBI-affiliated forensic psychiatrist who diagnosed Clancy with bipolar II and testified she was criminally responsible, admitted under Reddington's questioning that he wasn't brought onto this case until January or February of 2026 — well after the killings — and that he didn't even know how much his own university employer got paid for his testimony. Reddington didn't let that sit quietly, either, pressing the point that Saathoff's expert work runs almost exclusively for prosecutors, prisons, and the institutions that write his paychecks.It got more pointed from there. Saathoff confirmed Clancy did tell her husband and mother about homicidal ideation — but when Reddington asked whether she'd complained to doctors, friends, and family about dark, intrusive thoughts of suicide and homicidal ideation more broadly, Saathoff wouldn't concede the homicidal piece. He did admit she kept reaching out for help, and that she told her doctors about dark thoughts and suicidal ideation. What never got asked, notably: whether those thoughts were just thoughts, or whether she experienced them as voices.Saathoff also testified he treated women with postpartum depression back in the 1980s and '90s, background the defense clearly wants jurors weighing against his conclusions today.Clancy is now paralyzed from the waist down after allegedly jumping from a second-story window. Husband Patrick Clancy has relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #ExpertWitness #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #CrossExamination #Breaking

Lindsay Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is on trial for the murders of her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her defense, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, is arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication when it happened.Today the prosecution's expert took the stand, and he didn't hedge. Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a forensic psychiatrist with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit, testified that whatever voice Clancy said she heard never told her how to kill her children or where to do it — a detail the prosecution wants the jury sitting with. He described Clancy as gripped by a sense of "burdensomeness," convinced she couldn't return to work and that the family couldn't survive financially with her in it. He called her suicide attempt "very, very serious," pointing to the fact that she tried multiple methods as proof she meant it.Saathoff landed on a diagnosis — bipolar II — and said Clancy was suffering from a genuine mental disease at the time. But he drew a hard line after that: disease or not, he testified she understood right from wrong, and she was criminally responsible for what happened.That's the needle prosecutors are threading — real illness, real tragedy, but not legal insanity. After the killings, Clancy allegedly attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window and is now paralyzed from the waist down. Husband Patrick Clancy was out running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #BipolarII #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #FBIProfiler #Breaking

Lindsay Clancy is right-handed, Patrick Clancy is left-handed, and the knife on the nightstand was set down by a lefty. That's a real comment on this channel, and it's the kind of detail that sounds like evidence until you check whether anyone testified to it.No one did. State Police analyst Sherri Crook told the jury the knife had been moved about an inch on the nightstand, leaving an outline in blood, and that she couldn't say where it sat before that. Investigators recovered no usable fingerprints from it. No witness in this trial has said a word about which hand either Clancy favors.The same commenter says a nurse would never search for the carotid artery. Lindsay did. "Where is the carotid artery" is in her phone extraction, next to a search about how to end her life. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington put those searches on poster boards during his cross of Sgt. Timothy Chiappini, because they support his argument that she was planning her own death rather than researching harm to her children. Prosecutors had characterized the same history as searches for ways to kill. Chiappini initially didn't recall the carotid search, then agreed the device identifier matched her phone.That's the pattern across this whole segment. The theory reaches for a detail, the record has the detail, and the detail cuts the other way.Five comments, each one taken seriously and checked against testimony: the rope, the knife, the window, the psychosis admission, and the claim that Patrick fled the country. What Lindsay Clancy did is admitted by her own attorney. What her illness means is for the jury. Everything else in those comments is answerable, and I answer it.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #ClancyTrial #Duxbury #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

Day 6 of the Fernandez trial ended with the prosecution resting and the defense asking Judge London Kite to throw the case out. The motion argued what the defense has pressed all trial: the solicitation charge requires evidence of a communicative act, and six days of testimony produced nothing showing Fernandez asked Tenon to kill Bridegan. No message, no witness, no recording. The prosecution's answer was the boldest legal theory of the trial. An "earnest ask" isn't needed, they told the judge, because the murder is the proof. Fernandez is the only connection between the alleged gunman and the victim. The checks, the trust clause, the phone data gap during the hour of the shooting, and a January visit to the man who once owned a 10mm Glock matching the shell casings form the web. That web, prosecutors argued, is the communicative act. Judge Kite denied the motion. Before the jury entered the courtroom that morning, prosecutors had tried one more thing. Kim Jensen, a friend of Gardner'

The Commonwealth called Dr. Avram Mack to prove Lindsay Clancy was responsible and got a witness who repeated her account of the voice. Jackson County's DA promised a grand jury every piece of evidence her office collected and never collected Nolan Wells' phone. Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired from the Bureau after 25 years, joins Tony Brueski for the full interview on both. Clancy's side rested August 21, 2026. The closer was Resnick, the psychiatrist from the Andrea Yates acquittal, who told jurors she was psychotic and obeying a command voice on January 24, 2023. Coffindaffer has been on the guilt side since day one. Each of her arguments meets the record. Yates planned too. Testing done for the state found no faking. The paper trail includes a psychiatrist session the day before. The window left her paralyzed and on suicide watch. The credibility war follows. Resnick is 88 and evaluated her at four months; Mack evaluated her at three years. The chaplain who heard about the voice in

Eleven hours. That's how long forensic psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff, who's worked with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit, spent interviewing Lindsay Clancy over Zoom across May and June 2026 — and today he told a Plymouth Superior Court jury what came out of it. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is accused of strangling her three children — Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (7 months) — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Saathoff isn't a stranger to this specific horror — he testified he's diagnosed and treated five to seven women in the prison system who killed their children, and co-authored a 1980s paper on postpartum psychosis with four colleagues. He explained to jurors that psychosis itself isn't a

Day 6 of the Keffe D murder trial brought the 2017 Death Row Chronicles recording into the courtroom — and one exchange between the interviewer and Duane Davis landed harder than any confession the jury has heard so far. Davis described the night Tupac Shakur was shot, named his nephew as the gunman, and discussed Sean Combs and money. He said Combs wanted Suge Knight "taken care of" and then ghosted him when the situation got hot. The defense fought to keep the recording out, arguing it contained references to other crimes. The judge admitted it with limiting instructions — every version of Davis telling this story chips away at the fiction defense. Prosecution witness Michael Dorsey, the filmmaker behind Murder Rap, testified about recording the interview on his own phone and later alerting Las Vegas police. His phone recording captured audio the official production recorder missed. Combs has denied any involvement and has never been charged in connection with the case. Listen Anywh

Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a forensic psychiatrist who's consulted with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit, spent today explaining what he found when he sat down with Lindsay Clancy — the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan, with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her attorney Kevin Reddington is building an insanity defense around severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Saathoff isn't new to this territory — he told the court he's evaluated and treated five to seven women in the prison system who killed their children, and co-authored a paper on postpartum psychosis back in the 1980s. He drew a line for jurors between psychosis, which he called a symptom rather than a standalone illness, and the diagnoses that can produce it. H

Seven weeks. Nolan Wells died on Horn Island, Mississippi over the July 4 weekend, and the phone his family says was wiped has never been opened by a forensic examiner. Not by the sheriff, the DA, or the FBI. Jennifer Coffindaffer, who retired from the FBI after 25 years, sits down with Tony Brueski on why the single test that ends the argument still hasn't happened. The timeline is short and ugly. The friends brought the phone back to the mainland. Nolan's mother collected it from them in the first days and says the July 4 messages and photos were gone. The friends say they never touched it. On July 15, District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath and the family's lawyers agreed to examine it together at a community college digital lab. No date followed. Then a 48-hour ultimatum from the DA on August 12, sent while the parents were away. Then a four-day offer from the family on August 17. Nothing has been announced. The DA's only statement since didn't say the word "phone" but promised the

The prosecution's rebuttal case in the Lindsay Clancy trial took an unexpected turn when its second expert witness handed the jury a motive rooted in love instead of premeditation. Kirk Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist who examined Clancy at Tewksbury Hospital over three days, testified that her account of hearing a commanding voice on the night of the killings is clinically inconsistent. The voice appeared for eighteen minutes and never returned. She reported no accompanying delusions and made no attempt to resist it. He called the psychosis theory "a convenient way of lessening your own culpability." His alternative: Clancy was suicidal and took her children with her because she couldn't stand the idea of them suffering without her. He used the forensic term "altruistic filicide" — killing your children out of love. The first words Clancy spoke to Patrick when he walked through the door were about her own death, not the voice. Then a prosecution witness mentioned Catholic doctrine a

Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist called as a prosecution rebuttal witness, spent another day on the stand in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She has pleaded not guilty and is mounting an insanity defense, with attorney Kevin Reddington arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication at the time of the killings. Cross-examination resumed after a morning recess, and Reddington kept working the same angle he's been on for days — how severe was this, really, and why hasn't Heilbrun published on postpartum psychosis specifically. He walked through a list of symptoms and got Heilbrun to agree they line up with postpartum depression, all of which Clancy

Lindsay Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is on trial in Plymouth Superior Court on three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, accused of killing her children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She's pleaded not guilty, and attorney Kevin Reddington is running an insanity defense built on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. If direct examination was about Dr. Kirk Heilbrun's conclusions, cross was about his credentials — and Reddington went at them hard. He got Heilbrun to admit his evaluation of Clancy happened roughly three years after the killings, and got him to concede on the record that earlier is better when it comes to assessing someone's mental state after an offense. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of his own methodology. Heilbrun also testified he'd treated four or five women who'd killed their children — about 44 years ago. Reddi

Lindsay Clancy, the 34-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023, is back in Plymouth Superior Court, and this week the prosecution brought out its heaviest hitter yet. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and defense attorney Kevin Reddington is running an insanity defense built on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Monday got messy before the end. Reddington moved for a mistrial after "mortal sin" came up for the second time from the prosecution's side. Judge William Sullivan said no, but told jurors to strike anything about sin or religiosity from Dr. Kirk Heilbrun's testimony — and made it clear the prosecution needed to keep their own witness on a shorter leash. When Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist, came bac

A commenter who studied psychology at the university level has two objections to the Lindsay Clancy defense. Psychosis doesn't surface one second and vanish the next. And a truly psychotic woman wouldn't ask for a lawyer the moment she came out of a coma. Both are in the record, and both got an answer from witnesses the prosecution called. Dr. Sejal Shah, testifying for the Commonwealth, agreed on cross that a person can be in psychosis and still communicate and make plans. Defense psychologist Paul Zeizel told the jury hallucinations come and go like waves at the beach. No expert on either side described psychosis as a steady state. The lawyer question is true. Dr. Jhilam Biswas testified that on Jan. 26, 2023, still intubated, Lindsay wrote on paper that she felt horrified, asked whether she had an attorney, asked where her family was, and asked whether her body was broken. What that shows about her mind two days earlier is for the jury. The commenter's strongest point is also in the

To the prosecution's psychiatrist. The Commonwealth put Dr. Avram Mack on the stand in the Lindsay Clancy trial to say she was responsible for her actions. Under oath, he repeated what she'd told him: a man's voice, laughing, saying this was her last chance. Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired from the Bureau, argues the guilt side of the credibility war with Tony Brueski. Attacking witnesses is the whole second half of this trial. Resnick is too old and got to her too late, at four months. Mack got to her at three years. The chaplain isn't a clinician, and her notes never mention a voice. She also told jurors Clancy raised the voice with her in their earliest hospital visits, and she's made roughly two hundred visits since. The malpractice suit the voice was supposedly built for was filed in January 2026. The chaplain's account dates the voice to January 2023. Face-readers say Clancy smirks in court. Zeizel, sixty meetings in, said her children are on her mind every day. Mack said she crie

Lindsay Clancy's final psychiatric appointment was January 23, 2023. The killings were January 24. That single date is where the Lindsay Clancy trial's guilt arguments start to wobble, and Jennifer Coffindaffer, retired from the FBI after 25 years, is here to defend them anyway. The defense rested on August 21, 2026, after Dr. Phillip Resnick testified by video that Clancy was psychotic the day she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Resnick helped acquit Andrea Yates in 2006. He told this jury the command voice ran for some time before January 24 and that Clancy felt she had to obey it. Coffindaffer argues planning proves awareness. Tony puts Yates next to Clancy: both waited for a husband to leave, both acted methodically, one was found not guilty by reason of insanity. Coffindaffer argues the paper trail is thin. The record shows a psychiatrist, two nurse practitioners, a therapist, suicide hotline calls in December 2022, and a five-day stay at McLean Hospital that discharged her as lo

Two phones defined August 21 in the Jared Bridegan murder case, and the court could only reach one of them. The first belongs to Kirsten Bridegan. A judge halted Mario Fernandez's trial mid-testimony because Kirsten defied an order to surrender that phone for extraction on behalf of Shanna Gardner's lawyers. Gardner's attorneys say the material includes Kirsten's messages with the two children Gardner shares with Jared, both listed as witnesses, and argue the phone may show whether testimony was influenced. The show-cause order that followed put Jared's widow one hearing away from a contempt finding, until an appeals court stepped in hours later and gave her three business days to fight. The second phone belonged to Fernandez, and according to a Jacksonville Sheriff's Office detective, it was factory reset on August 26, 2022, six months after the killing and the same day as a T-Mobile store purchase. Prosecutors say Fernandez kept right on using the wiped device, logged back into 35 ac

Nolan Wells' DA and the family agreed to a joint forensic examination of the phone that left Horn Island with his friends. A month passed. The DA sent a 48-hour letter. The deal collapsed. That phone has been sitting in a drawer for six weeks while Snapchat and WhatsApp servers purge data.Lindsay Clancy's prosecution spent three weeks proving premeditation against a defendant who had already admitted to the killings. Their own witnesses called her a wonderful mother. Their own psychiatrist never met her in person. They asked her mother-in-law about mortal sin. They told the jury she faked a suicide attempt while she sat in front of them in a wheelchair.Two cases where the prosecution's own conduct may be doing more harm to their case than anything the defense has put on. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, breaks down the mistakes and where both cases go from here.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillersPodcast #EricFaddis #ProsecutionBlunders #PostpartumPsychosis #HornIsland #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense

Day 5 of the Duane "Keffe D" Davis trial belonged to a question detectives asked him in 2009: what went through your head when Tupac Shakur died? His recorded answer opens this episode, and everything that follows tracks who profited from the story he's told for years. The retired detective who took his 2008 confession put it in a book. Two consultants from that world helped build a BET docuseries — one of them wrote the interview questions and recorded the session on his phone. The director admitted cutting sealed police audio into the show and paying Davis to sit for it. Prosecutors say all that talking is precisely why the confession can now be used to convict him. The episode also covers Leonard Jefferson, whose photo of Tupac and Suge Knight at a stoplight became the last image of the rapper alive, and whose release from the scene a detective later called a mistake. On tape, Davis insists the shooting grew out of a beating at the MGM Grand, that the crew hunted Suge Knight first,

The prosecution rested after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses. Before trial, the defense conceded that Lindsay Clancy killed her children. The prosecution's job was to prove she was sane and acting with premeditation when she did it. After three weeks, what they may have proven instead is how badly her medical providers failed her.Patrick Clancy, their first witness, testified he was never told not to leave Lindsay alone with the children and that he didn't know what psychosis was until after January 24th. The prosecution's own psychiatrist admitted under cross that she never met Lindsay in person across fourteen appointments.The defense psychologist has met with Lindsay more than sixty times and diagnosed her with bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis. He testified she had no appreciation for the wrongfulness of her act. Lindsay's mother and mother-in-law both took the stand and described a woman begging for help that never came in the form she needed.Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates whether the prosecution accomplished what it needed to and where this jury is likely to land.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillersPodcast #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #DrPaulZeizel #TrueCrime #Duxbury

Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist called by the prosecution, took the stand today in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her attorney Kevin Reddington is building an insanity defense around severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Heilbrun evaluated Clancy three years after the killings, and testified she tended to underreport or minimize her own symptoms — which, coming from a rebuttal witness, is not a throwaway line. He didn't dispute that her suicide attempt was serious; he said the opposite, noting she remains on one-to-one suicide precautions at Tewksbury and is still considered at risk. What he disputed is the cause of the children's deat

Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist called as a prosecution rebuttal witness, spent an ho on the stand laying out a timeline that doesn't do the prosecution any favors in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy — the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan, with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and is mounting an insanity defense centered on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Heilbrun opened by explaining retention bias — the tendency to lean toward whichever side hired you for the evaluation — before detailing his own work: roughly 180 hours reviewing police records, medical records, court documents, and surveillance footage, plus 10.5 hours testing and interviewing Clancy and 1.5 hours in collateral interviews. He testifie

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial now turns on a sentence she said in her basement on January 24, 2023. The Plymouth County DA's psychiatric expert, Dr. Avram Mack, testified she told him she said "go to God" as she strangled each child, and he told the jury that proves she understood her actions were wrong. Hours earlier, defense psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick told the same jury she was frankly psychotic that day, heard a command, felt her body controlled by an outside force like a puppet, and believed sending her children to heaven was the right thing to do. He examined her four months after the deaths. Mack first met her more than three years later. Mack conceded a severe major depressive episode but found no psychosis and no mania in the months before the killings. He testified that psychosis on its own doesn't prevent someone from knowing right from wrong. Tony Brueski argues that line does as much damage to the prosecution as to the defense, because the state spent eighteen days pr

Redirect testimony from Dr. Avram Mack turned into a battle over diagnostic fine print Monday in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her defense is built on a claim of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication led by attorney Kevin Reddington. After Reddington spent his cross picking at Mack's credentials and motives, prosecutors used redirect to reframe the whole diagnostic argument. They had Mack explain that while postpartum psychosis isn't its own DSM diagnosis, "postpartum onset" is a recognized specifier that can attach to conditions like bipolar disorder and depression — meaning the clinical reality the defense is describing has a home in

Monday's session in the Lindsay Clancy trial belonged to the defense, as attorney Kevin Reddington took apart prosecution rebuttal witness Dr. Avram Mack piece by piece. Clancy, the 34-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023, faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her defense rests on an insanity argument built around severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Reddington's cross covered a lot of ground fast. He brought up past cases where Mack was found not credentialed enough to testify, then asked about money — Mack said expert testimony nets him several hundred thousand dollars a year. Reddington had him define confirmatory bias, then asked if he'd exhibited it evaluating Clancy; Mack said no. Mack testified his own evalua

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial hit a rough patch Monday for the prosecution, as its own rebuttal witness, psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack, spent hours under cross-examination from defense attorney Kevin Reddington. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her attorneys are pursuing an insanity defense centered on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication. Reddington didn't ease in. He started with prior cases where courts had ruled Mack unqualified to testify, then moved to money — Mack testified he pulls in several hundred thousand dollars a year doing expert witness work. Asked to define confirmatory bias and then asked point-blank if he'd shown it evaluating Clancy, Mack said no. He

The prosecution has rested its case against Lindsay Clancy. After three weeks and more than seventy witnesses, some of the prosecution's most damaging moments came from their own conduct in the courtroom.On cross-examination of Lindsay's former mother-in-law, the prosecutor asked whether she was an active Catholic, then asked if she was aware that murder is considered a mortal sin. The judge called a sidebar and instructed the jury to disregard the question. Lindsay's mother took the stand and testified that her daughter said the medication was destroying her mind. The prosecution's cross: why didn't you have her committed? During autopsy testimony, Lindsay sobbed until the judge halted proceedings. The next morning brought a hot-mic dispute — the defense alleging someone said “shut her up,” the DA's office claiming the words were “shut it off.”The prosecution opened the trial by calling a paralyzed woman's jump from a second-story window a faked suicide attempt. Their own psychiatrist treated Lindsay exclusively by telehealth and admitted she never met her patient face to face.Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, breaks down the prosecution's courtroom conduct and how a jury processes these moments.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillersPodcast #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #MortalSin #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #Duxbury

The family agreed. The DA agreed. A joint forensic examination of Nolan Wells' phone at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College. Both sides' experts in the room, possibly the FBI. Then a month went by without a date being set, and the DA sent a letter: hand over the phone in 48 hours.The phone had already been through civilian hands. Nolan's mother and her sister opened both Snapchat accounts before any forensic protocol existed and found them empty. Meanwhile, the three friends who were with Nolan on Horn Island turned over their own devices to the FBI without being asked twice.Forensic experts say the longer that phone sits unexamined, the more data Snapchat and WhatsApp purge from their servers. The state autopsy is sealed. A grand jury is supposedly reviewing the case. And the phone that might answer what happened on July 4 has not been touched by a single forensic tool.Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former prosecutor, breaks down who is responsible for the collapsed deal and whether the evidence can still be recovered.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #HiddenKillersPodcast #Snapchat #PhoneEvidence #Mississippi #GrandJury #DigitalForensics #TrueCrime #JusticeForNolan

Lindsay Clancy sat through fourteen telehealth sessions with her psychiatrist in the weeks before her three children died in their Duxbury home, and that doctor told the jury she never appeared psychotic. Then came the hospital chaplain — the person who has spent more hours with Clancy than nearly anyone alive, roughly two hundred visits across three years at Tewksbury Hospital. She testified that Clancy described a male voice commanding her to kill her children and then herself, or none of them would be safe. On cross-examination, the prosecutor got her to admit something the defense didn't want said out loud: in two hundred visits, she never wrote that voice down. That gap now sits at the center of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Once an insanity defense is raised under Massachusetts law, the burden shifts — prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible when she used exercise bands on her three children. To carry that burden, the state needs jurors to conclude the chaplain either missed the most important thing Clancy ever told her, or that Clancy invented it after she survived her own suicide attempt. Phone forensics don't make the answer easier — Clancy had searched "symptoms of postpartum psychosis," timed her husband's errand, and ordered the takeout that cleared him out of the house. The defense calls it a woman failed by a medical system that kept adjusting her prescriptions without hearing her. The prosecution calls it premeditation with a convenient excuse attached. Tony Brueski lays out both sides of a case that keeps getting harder to call, with closing arguments expected the week of August 24. LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMom #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

A psychiatrist who prescribed twelve of Lindsay Clancy's thirty medications in four months sat on the stand at Plymouth Superior Court and couldn't defend her own paperwork. Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay exclusively over telehealth, never meeting her face to face, and never pulled records from another clinic treating her at the same time. When defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked if she had, she said no. "Seriously?" he replied. Then he confronted her with her own chart notes documenting pressured speech — a potential mania symptom — and she told the jury the notes didn't reflect what she meant. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke were both in the room for it, and Tony Brueski combines their breakdowns of a prosecution witness who may have done more for the defense than the defense did for itself. Nurse practitioners also testified, describing Lindsay pleading to change medications that were making her worse, while one nurse told the prosecution directly she saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy opened for the prosecution, describing his wife's "best day" hours before their children died, followed by months of intrusive thoughts and a growing list of prescriptions. After fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses, this episode asks the question the jury is now sitting with: did the Commonwealth's own case just make the defense's argument for them? Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #DefenseDiaries #MurderTrial 

A South Carolina county of 37,000 people, where the Murdaugh family ran the local prosecutor's office for three generations, will not be hosting Alex Murdaugh's retrial. Judge Debra McCaslin pulled the case entirely outside the 14th Judicial Circuit at an August 14 pretrial hearing, and Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer break down everything else that happened in that courtroom. Murdaugh's defense told the court that weapons from a recent Allendale County homicide may be ballistically linked to the Moselle murder weapons — information prosecutor Creighton Waters said he'd never heard, despite daily contact with SLED. McCaslin ordered independent lab testing on unidentified male DNA recovered from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails, siding with the defense's argument that SLED's own retesting process risked destroying the sample. She ruled Murdaugh's 2023 sworn testimony — including his admission that he lied about being at the kennels the night his wife and son died — can be replayed for the new jury. She's also now personally managing jury summons after questions arose about whether court official Becky Hill's interference in the original trial began earlier than previously understood. Murdaugh's team separately wants the murder charges voided outright, alleging a SLED agent fabricated evidence presented to the grand jury; that motion has not been ruled on. The next hearing lands November 14, with the retrial set for April 5, 2027. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #CreightonWaters #PaulMurdaugh 

Nobody disputes what happened to Lindsay Clancy's three children. Not the prosecution. Not her own defense attorney, who told the jury in opening statements that she did it. Patrick Clancy testified about finding Cora, Dawson, and Callan in their Duxbury home. Surveillance footage, phone records, and the 911 call all corroborate the same account. And still, a massive online audience has decided the entire case is a cover-up. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski for a two-part conversation on why agreement from both sides of a courtroom isn't enough to satisfy people who've already made up their minds. She breaks down why a tragedy this size creates a psychological need for a villain worse than a mother suffering catastrophic psychosis — and why every fact introduced to correct the record just adds fuel instead of putting it out. Then the conversation turns to the people doing the posting themselves. They report real physical symptoms — shaking hands, sleepless nights, rage over strangers they will never meet. Scott explains how the case has become an outlet for something that has nothing to do with Duxbury, and what it's costing the people it's aimed at. Patrick Clancy is now receiving death threats over a version of events even Lindsay's own lawyer has never argued. Scott closes with what she'd say to someone who is completely certain of a story the evidence doesn't support. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheories #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePsychology 

A man who already confessed to killing Jared Bridegan stood up in a Jacksonville Beach courtroom in February 2026 and asked for a trial. Henry Tenon had pleaded to second-degree murder, agreed to fifteen years minimum, and signed on to testify against the two people prosecutors say paid him to do it. Then he changed his mind — and turned his own confession into something the state now has to prove without his cooperation. The man on trial in his place, for now, is Mario Fernandez, Tenon's former landlord, charged with first-degree murder and solicitation to commit a capital felony. An FBI agent walked jurors through Tenon's phone on a Saturday eighteen days before the murder — a drive from Fernandez's rental property toward Bridegan's neighborhood and his kids' gymnastics facility, then back. Prosecutors call it a rehearsal. The defense calls it a renovation errand and points to video of Fernandez meeting contractors at the property that same window. No DNA, fingerprints, or surveillance ties Fernandez to the truck linked to the ambush, and the lead detective has already conceded there's no physical evidence tying him to the gun. Three checks from Fernandez to Tenon, ten thousand dollars total, are dated weeks after Bridegan was killed — memo lines reading "landscaping" and "Kickstarter Good Luck!!" And a prosecutor let slip that a second person was there the night Bridegan died, someone still uncharged. Bridegan was thirty-three, a father of four, killed after stopping on a dark road to move a tire while his two-year-old rode in the back seat. Gardner's trial starts in September. Tenon's comes in 2027. His widow is watching all three unfold. LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #BrideganTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast 

None of the four providers treating Lindsay Clancy in the months before her children died ever spoke to one another. Her nurse practitioner didn't know she'd seen her psychiatrist fourteen times in four months. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down what that disconnect — and what came after it — mean for the jury at Plymouth Superior Court. Clancy searched "hallucinations" on her phone five days before the killings. A postpartum program turned her away for being overmedicated. After the deaths she jumped from a second-story window, breaking her spine and leaving her permanently paralyzed; she also slashed her neck and wrists and went into cardiac arrest in the ICU. The Commonwealth rested its case after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses, and the defense started that same afternoon with three: Lindsay's mother, her sister, and a former coworker. Her mother testified about a daughter who texted that something was wrong. Patrick told the jury Lindsay described hearing a man's voice telling her to act — prosecutors have never disputed that she heard it, only argued she could have resisted. None of the prosecution's own psychiatrists or nurse practitioners had ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis before this case. This episode traces the missed coordination, the witness gap, and what the jury is now weighing. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

Every other person who was in that white Cadillac the night Tupac Shakur died is dead. Duane "Keffe D" Davis is the only one left to tell it — and the Tupac Shakur murder trial in Las Vegas is now entirely about whether his version can be trusted. Davis says he rode in the front passenger seat on September 7, 1996, watched Shakur pull up in a black BMW driven by Marion "Suge" Knight, and passed a handgun into the back seat. He says his nephew, Orlando Anderson, took it and opened fire. Shakur died six days later at 25. Anderson was never charged; he was killed in an unrelated shooting years ago. Knight isn't cooperating. The driver of the Cadillac is gone too. That leaves one voice, and it belongs to the man prosecutors say organized the whole thing. Davis told this story to a detective in 2008 who promised him immunity from anything he said in that room. He told it again in a BET documentary, in a 2019 memoir, and in paid interviews — after a retired detective published details first in a 2011 book. He was indicted in September 2023 and has pleaded not guilty, facing life in prison. His attorneys call the state's case fiction dressed up as fact, and they point out that with everyone else gone, there's no one left to check his story against. That's the problem sitting at the center of this trial. A story with no living witness to contradict it isn't the same as a proven story — but juries convict on testimony like this all the time. Hidden Killers lays out what Davis said, when he said it, and why being the last man standing might be the most dangerous position he's ever been in. Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #DuaneDavis #TupacMurderTrial #OrlandoAnderson #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LasVegas #SugeKnight 

Nobody in the Lindsay Clancy courtroom has accused Patrick Clancy of anything. Online, it's a different story entirely. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to unpack how a man who testified about burying his own three children became a target for two opposite theories running at the same time. On TikTok, a blood-stain expert's testimony about the windowsill turned into a fully built scenario overnight: Patrick shoving Lindsay through the glass. Photos of his new wife got placed next to old photos of Lindsay, hair and build matched up, and a wedding three years after his children's deaths became evidence of a plan. On a separate front, the case has split almost cleanly by gender. Men on X want maximum punishment for Lindsay and no engagement with the psychosis defense or the thirteen medications from five prescribers. Women online have taken the opposite position, casting Patrick as a narcissist and invoking Chris Watts by name. Patrick told the jury directly that he wasn't married to a monster. Lindsay's own attorney has told the jury she killed her children. Dreeke and Scott trace how a medical symptom got recast as a motive, why remarriage reads as guilt to both camps for opposite reasons, and what it costs a father to be tried by an audience that was never in the courtroom. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #GenderWar #Duxbury 

Brian Thompson's widow sat in the front row of a federal courtroom and cried while the man who killed her husband described the killing without a flicker of remorse. Luigi Mangione pleaded guilty to two counts of stalking in Thompson's death — no deal, no negotiation, nothing traded away. In his own statement to the judge, Mangione admitted he stalked the UnitedHealthcare CEO to an investor conference, posed as an investor overseeing tens of billions of dollars to learn exactly where and when Thompson would be, 3D-printed the gun, and traveled to New York intending to kill him. He referenced a broken back. He referenced the health insurance system. He never once mentioned Brian Thompson as a husband, a father, a person Paulette Thompson loved. Within hours of the plea, his defense team filed to dismiss the separate state murder case on double jeopardy grounds — the same case where jury selection had been set for September 8. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sits down with Tony Brueski to unpack a defendant who has now beaten a terrorism charge, beaten the federal death penalty, and may be about to beat a state murder trial too. Federal sentencing is set for December 18; the guidelines suggest twenty-four to thirty years, but prosecutors outside the courthouse said they're pushing for life. Mangione is twenty-eight years old. This episode covers the confession, the legal maneuvering nobody saw coming until it happened, and what a stalking conviction actually means for a man who admitted to murder on the record. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LuigiMangione #BrianThompson #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #GuiltyPlea #DoubleJeopardy #TrueCrime #UnitedHealthcare #PaulletteThompson #CriminalJustice 

There's a moment in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to sit with than the autopsy testimony — and that's saying something. Jurors wept when the medical examiner described injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy sobbed at the defense table and said she couldn't go through it. The judge called multiple recesses. Her attorney, who'd torn into her psychiatrist for three straight hours days before, sat silent through the medical examiner's testimony.But it's her husband's words that this episode keeps circling back to. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the day their three children died in a way the courtroom did not expect.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense rests on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, built on a paper trail that's hard to look away from: thirteen psychiatric medications from five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating, one hospital that allegedly turned her away for being overmedicated, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Her journal entries, read into the trial record, chart a woman losing her grip on her own mind days before it happened.Bob Motta was in that courtroom watching the jury process all of it in real time. This episode walks through what jurors saw, what the medical record documents, and why a husband's single description of that morning is the detail nobody's stopped talking about.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #DuxburyMA #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

Two timelines now sit in front of the jury deciding Mario Fernandez's fate in the Jared Bridegan murder-for-hire trial. Before the killing: January 29, 2022, when FBI records show Henry Tenon's phone leaving Fernandez's Potomac Avenue rental and tracing Bridegan's world — his neighborhood, his kids' gym, Jacksonville Beach — while Fernandez's phone pinged around the property. After the killing: three checks from Fernandez to Tenon, $2,000 and $3,000 dated March 28, 2022, and $5,000 dated April 4, with "landscaping" and "Kickstarter Good Luck!!" on the memo lines. Prosecutors read those two timelines as a rehearsal and a payoff. The defense reads them as a renovation day and a bill for property work — one memo, it argues, may actually say "roofing."Day 4 also produced the trial's sharpest concessions. Lead Detective Chris Johns agreed no DNA, prints, or footage put Fernandez in the blue F-150. ATF Agent Mike Stengel agreed investigators never searched the home where the truck turned up — and then told the jury investigators were informed in 2023 that the gun was destroyed shortly after the shooting. The defense disputes that account.Fernandez is charged as the orchestrator: first-degree murder and solicitation to commit a capital felony, for allegedly hiring his former tenant to kill his wife's ex-husband. Tony Brueski walks through why evidence that would sink a gunman means little against this charge, why the quiet cellphone testimony bears on it directly, and what it means that all three defendants — Fernandez, Shanna Gardner, and Henry Tenon — will face juries in the span of months. The verdict watch starts when testimony ends August 28.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #FernandezTrial

In Massachusetts, a psychiatrist testified that she treated Lindsay Clancy fourteen times over four months and never detected psychosis. The last session was the day before Clancy allegedly killed her three children. In Las Vegas, Keffe D's defense attorney opened the Tupac Shakur murder trial by telling the jury that his client's two decades of confessions — to the FBI, on television, and in a published memoir — were fiction designed to sell copies. In Florida, Henry Tenon withdrew the guilty plea he entered after confessing to shooting Jared Bridegan on a dark road while a two-year-old daughter sat in the car. He told the judge his cooperation testimony was false and demanded his own trial. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke work through the listener questions connecting these three active cases. Each trial has a moment where someone's story stopped adding up. A doctor who says she saw no signs. A defendant who told the same story for twenty years and now says he made it up. A confessed gunman who changed his mind about confessing. The listener questions in this episode land where the stories break — and where the juries have to decide what's real.END_LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #TupacShakur #JaredBridegan #KeffeD #MarioFernandez #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #MurderTrial

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial resumed Friday with Dr. Avram Mack, a psychiatrist called by the prosecution, continuing his rebuttal testimony after the lunch break. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Mack testified that Clancy told him she heard a command voice tell her this was her "last chance" — that she had to kill her children before killing herself. He diagnosed her with major depressive disorder, which he agreed qualifies as a Mental Disease or Defect. His conclusion, though, was that she retained the capacity to know her actions were wrong, and therefore retained criminal responsibility.Reddington used cross-examination to chip away at Mack's credibility. Mack confirmed he's being compensated by the district attorney's office, that Park Dietz & Associates brought him in, and that he'd met with Clancy alongside a second forensic psychiatrist from that same firm — declining, notably, to discuss "the contact" between the two of them. He also testified Clancy had a "lifelong history" of medication resistance, then acknowledged that claim isn't documented anywhere in his own notes. What he did document: she avoided medication specifically because she was breastfeeding.The trial continues at Plymouth Superior Court and is expected to run several more weeks.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #AvramMack #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

Tupac Shakur's family sat in a Las Vegas courtroom and listened to Duane "Keffe D" Davis describe the night of September 7, 1996 in his own voice. The recording came from a 2008 police interview that opened with a promise: nothing Davis said could be used against him, and nothing would leave the room. The Tupac Shakur murder trial has now put every word in front of a jury.Davis, charged with murder with a deadly weapon and a gang enhancement, has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors never claim he fired a shot. Their case is that he planned the retaliation after his nephew was beaten at the MGM Grand hours earlier, obtained the gun, and handed it toward the back seat of the white Cadillac, where Orlando Anderson allegedly used it. On the tape, Davis says the angle decided everything, and that Shakur's side of the street was the only thing that kept him from firing personally.The interview happened because a task force was chasing the killing of the Notorious B.I.G. Detectives testified they asked Davis nothing about Tupac and he raised it himself, contradicting denials he had given the FBI a decade earlier.No gun was ever recovered and the Cadillac was never found, and the other three men from the car are dead. What the state holds is Davis's recorded account, his memoir, his documentary appearances, and its argument that going public destroyed the confidentiality he was promised. The defense calls all of it fiction sold for money.The tape is in evidence now, and the promise protects nobody. This episode covers what jurors heard and what it costs both sides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TupacMurderTrial #DuaneDavis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #TupacTrial #Compton #LasVegas

Dr. Avram Mack, a psychiatrist testifying for the prosecution, returned to the stand Friday afternoon in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her attorney, Kevin Reddington, is mounting an insanity defense built on claims of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Mack told the jury that Clancy described hearing a command voice tell her this was her "last chance" — that she needed to kill her kids before she could kill herself. In Mack's opinion, Clancy was suffering from major depressive disorder, which he classified as a Mental Disease or Defect. But he drew a hard line there: he says she still knew right from wrong, and still bore criminal responsibility.Cross-examination got interesting. Mack admitted the DA's office is paying him, that Park Dietz & Associates brought him onto the case, and that he'd met with Clancy alongside another forensic psychiatrist from that same firm — though he wouldn't discuss "the contact" between them. He also claimed Clancy had a "lifelong history" of resisting medication, then had to concede under questioning that this detail isn't actually in his notes. What is in his notes: she didn't want to take medication because she was breastfeeding. That's a meaningful gap between what he said on direct and what he can actually back up.The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court and is expected to run several weeks.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #AvramMack #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #Breaking

The prosecution told the jury that the only connection between Jared Bridegan and the man accused of shooting him is Mario Fernandez. Fernandez allegedly wrote three checks totaling ten thousand dollars to Henry Tenon in the weeks after the killing. The defense says those checks were for legitimate property work — tile, tree removal, landscaping — and showed video of Tenon doing exactly that. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke work through the listener questions hitting hardest on this case. A prosecutor revealed in a pretrial filing that Tenon was not alone the night Bridegan was killed. Someone fled on foot and someone else drove a truck from the scene. If a fourth person was involved and hasn't been charged, what does that do to the entire theory of the case? Tenon confessed, took a plea deal, and then withdrew it — telling the judge he wanted a trial and that his prior testimony was false. He won't be tried until 2027. Gardner starts in September. Fernandez is on trial now. Jared was a thirty-three-year-old Microsoft employee, a father of four, and a man killed with his two-year-old daughter ten feet away. Kirsten Bridegan is about to sit through three trials to find out who is telling the truth.END_LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #ShannaGardner #HenryTenon #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #BrideganTrial

Lindsay Clancy, the 34-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mother charged with murdering her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — is standing trial in Plymouth Superior Court. Prosecutors allege she strangled the children with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023, then attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window, leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. She's pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing insanity — severe postpartum psychosis compounded by psychiatric overmedication.Today the prosecution called in a rebuttal witness with a very different read. Dr. Avram Mack, a psychiatrist who reviewed Clancy's records and met with her in April 2026, testified that evaluating someone's mental state means looking at who they were at the moment of the act — not building a narrative around it. He described a woman uninterested in her own hygiene, indifferent to hospital food, and largely withdrawn from other patients, though she did accept visitors at times. He noted she's on numerous psychiatric medications, but at low doses.Mack's conclusion cuts against the defense's central theory on two fronts. He believes Clancy experienced a major depressive episode as part of major depressive disorder — not postpartum psychosis, and not bipolar disorder, since he says he found no evidence of mania or hypomania anywhere in her records.Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands when it happened and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial is expected to run several more weeks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #AvramMack #Breaking

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is nearly over, and Day 17 belonged to one witness: Sheila Cavanaugh, the Brigham and Women's chaplain who sat with Clancy the day her breathing tube came out. Clancy's first words that morning are the most haunting piece of testimony this trial has produced, and this episode opens with them.Cavanaugh described about fourteen hospital visits, then roughly two hundred more at Tewksbury Hospital over three years. Across those visits, she testified, Clancy kept returning to a male voice that commanded her to kill her children and herself. Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague's cross-examination landed hard: none of Cavanaugh's notes mention any voice. But the burden in this courtroom runs one way — the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible when she strangled her three children, acts no one disputes. Defense psychologist Paul Zeizel spent over thirty-five hours with Clancy and testified he found no evidence of malingering. And the phone forensics the state used to argue planning also captured Clancy searching about insomnia, bipolar disorder, and the symptoms of postpartum psychosis in the days and weeks before January 24, 2023.With closing arguments expected the week of August 24, Tony lays out the choice in front of the jury: distrust a chaplain with no stake in the case, believe a three-year lie no witness supported, or accept that the voice was real.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #MurderTrial #Duxbury #Massachusetts

Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist and one of the country's leading experts on filicide — cases where a parent kills their own children — testified via Zoom today in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan, with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her defense, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, is arguing severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Resnick evaluated Clancy in person about four months after the killings — over three and a half hours with her, another hour and a half with her parents. He described her as heavily medicated, matter-of-fact, blunted. Worth noting: the prosecution's own doctors didn't examine her until three years after the crime. Resnick, like the other evaluators, found no evidence she was faking or minimizing for sympathy — if anything, she downplayed her own symptoms. His diagnosis: Bipolar II with severe depression, postpartum anxiety that worsened with each pregnancy, and on the day of the killings, full postpartum psychosis — command hallucinations, a sense that her own body wasn't hers to control. His conclusion was blunt: she was unable to conform her conduct to the requirements of the law. Prosecutors pushed back hard on cross, leaning on how rare this kind of filicide actually is. After Resnick stepped down, the defense rested.Prosecutors are expected to argue Clancy understood the nature of her actions despite the defense's mental-health claims. After the killings, Clancy allegedly attempted to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window, leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out of the home running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial, underway in Plymouth Superior Court, is expected to last several weeks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerContent on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #Breaking