Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

The man who took Nancy Guthrie from her Tucson home prepared for weeks — and still made mistakes that could define the entire investigation. He surveilled the house. He masked his face. He brought a weapon and a backpack. But he dropped a glove, wore gear traceable to Walmart, and left behind DNA that just came back with zero matches in the national database. This is someone who planned but couldn't execute cleanly. Someone who crossed the line into serious violence for what appears to be the first time.In this episode of Hidden Killers, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — author of The Minds of Mass Killers and a thirty-year veteran of forensic mental health work — analyzes the psychology behind the crime itself. Not the evidence. The choices. What does it mean when someone capable of kidnapping an 84-year-old medically fragile woman has no criminal history in CODIS? What does the gap between surveillance-level preparation and Walmart-level execution tell us about his psychological state on the night of February 1st? And what is happening inside his mind right now — two and a half weeks in, with helicopters overhead, his face on wanted posters, and the FBI closing in on every piece of gear he touched?Scott breaks down the dueling theories — planned kidnapping versus burglary gone wrong — from a clinical standpoint and explains why the answer matters far beyond this case. She examines what the decision to target a vulnerable elderly woman reveals about empathy, risk processing, and the psychological threshold this person crossed when he separated Nancy from her pacemaker, her medication, and everything keeping her alive.This is criminal psychology grounded in confirmed facts, built to hold up no matter where the investigation goes.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #GuthrieSuspect #CriminalPsychology #TucsonKidnapping #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #CODISNoMatch #PimaCountyJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two versions of the same family. One told to a judge. One allegedly lived by the girl who's now dead.On November 7th, 2025, Anna Kepner—an 18-year-old cheerleader from Titusville, Florida—was found dead under a bed on the Carnival Horizon cruise ship. Wrapped in blankets. Covered with life vests. Her death was ruled mechanical asphyxiation. Her 16-year-old stepbrother, who shared that cabin, is now the sole suspect.Under oath, Anna's stepmother described the three teenagers sharing that room as "best friends" and "the Three Amigos." But Anna's ex-boyfriend told reporters a different story: he claims the stepbrother was obsessed with her. He alleges that nine months before the cruise, the stepbrother climbed on top of Anna during a FaceTime call and ran when confronted.Custody hearings revealed the stepbrother had been in therapy for over a year. A travel advisor recommended separate rooms for the step-siblings. That recommendation was apparently overruled. On the night before Anna's body was found, her ex-boyfriend alleges the youngest sibling in that cabin was locked out—and heard yelling, chairs thrown, and the stepbrother screaming at Anna.The adults' cabin was directly across the hall. Shauntel Hudson testified she last saw the teens at 7:30pm. Nearly sixteen hours passed before anyone checked on Anna.This episode examines the psychological traps of blended families—the pressure to present harmony, the confirmation bias that filters out concerning behavior, and why children often suppress their own distress to avoid breaking the family narrative. People outside the household allegedly saw patterns. The custody-battling father raised alarms. The ex-boyfriend reported obsessive behavior. But the family sailed off on vacation anyway.The stepbrother appeared in sealed federal juvenile proceedings on February 6th, 2026. Anna's father confirmed he was arrested and released to a guardian. He told reporters he was "pissed off."Anna was supposed to graduate in May. She planned to join the Navy. She got a night no one checked on her until it was too late.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #CruiseShipDeath #BlendedFamilyDynamics #FBIHomicide #TrueCrime #CustodyHearing #RedFlags #CarnivalCruise #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Three major cases. One extended legal breakdown. Defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes the vulnerabilities in each—and what the defense will exploit.The Nancy Guthrie investigation is sixteen days old with no arrest—but the prosecution's case may already be compromised. Crime scene reportedly released early. FBI allegedly wanted evidence processed at Quantico; it was sent to a private Florida lab. Fifteen of sixteen gloves collected were reportedly contamination from the search team. Bob explains how each failure translates into courtroom strategy.The Anna Kepner case is sealed under federal juvenile protection laws. Anna, 14, died aboard the Carnival Horizon—ruled homicide by mechanical asphyxiation. Her stepbrother appeared in federal court three months later and was released to guardian custody. Bob explains what sealed proceedings look like, why the FBI kept the case federal, and what custody proceeding filings have revealed about potential defense strategies.The Kouri Richins trial begins February 23rd. Prosecutors allege she poisoned her husband Eric with fentanyl. But the alleged supplier, Robert Crozier, recanted. No fentanyl was recovered from the home. The judge excluded evidence that Eric was allegedly abusive. Bob analyzes what the defense is working with—including how to handle devastating Google searches and the "Walk the Dog" letter.He also addresses the shadow cast by Kouri's mother Lisa Darden, whose romantic partner died of an oxycodone overdose in 2006 shortly after naming her as beneficiary.This is the comprehensive defense perspective across three major cases.#NancyGuthrie #AnnaKepner #KouriRichins #DefenseAttorney #ThreeCases #LegalStrategy #CrimeSceneEvidence #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The Kouri Richins case looks like an open-and-shut murder. A Utah mom allegedly poisons her husband with fentanyl, attempts to collect insurance money, writes a children's book about grief. Case closed, right?Not even close.As trial begins on February 23rd, the evidence that seems most damning keeps shifting. The prosecution's key witness—the man who allegedly supplied the fentanyl—now says he never sold fentanyl at all. He claims he was detoxing during his original police interview and doesn't remember what he said. No pills were ever recovered from the Richins home.But that's not the hidden layer that haunts this case.Kouri's defense tried to introduce evidence that Eric was abusive—that he'd given her a black eye. The judge excluded it. A domestic violence expert was barred from testifying. Whatever truth exists about their marriage, the jury won't hear that side.Then there's Kouri's mother, Lisa Darden. In 2006, Darden's romantic partner died of an oxycodone overdose—shortly after naming Darden as her estate's beneficiary. The detective investigating Eric's death wrote that it's "possible" Darden was involved in planning Eric's death. She was present the night he died. No charges have been filed.This episode breaks down what's hidden beneath the headlines: the recanted witness, the excluded evidence, the mother's shadow, and the financial desperation that may have driven everything. We examine both the prosecution's architecture and the defense's grenades.Eight jurors will decide Kouri's fate. But they won't have the full picture—and neither will you unless you hear what got left out.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillers #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #LisaDarden #WitnessRecantation #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #ExcludedEvidence #SummitCountyJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Kouri Richins goes to trial February 23rd on charges she allegedly poisoned her husband Eric with fentanyl. The prosecution has over 100 witnesses and 1,000 exhibits. But defense attorney Bob Motta says this case has vulnerabilities that could create reasonable doubt.Robert Crozier—the man prosecutors say supplied fentanyl to Kouri's housekeeper—recanted in October 2025. He now says he sold OxyContin, not fentanyl, and was "detoxing" during his original statement. The judge still denied bail, but that recantation matters at trial.No fentanyl was ever recovered from the Richins home. The only physical evidence is what was in Eric's body. Everything linking Kouri to the drug is testimony—and the defense will attack that testimony's credibility.The judge excluded evidence that Eric was allegedly abusive and barred a domestic violence expert from testifying. Bob analyzes what that exclusion costs the defense and whether alternative strategies exist.Prosecutors will present Kouri's Google searches after Eric's death: "lethal dose of fentanyl," "luxury prisons for the rich," "permanently delete information from iPhone." Bob explores whether any defense framing can survive that evidence.The "Walk the Dog" letter allegedly found in Kouri's jail cell appears to contain witness tampering instructions. The defense says it's fiction from a manuscript she was writing. The judge partially admitted it.And there's a shadow: Lisa Darden, Kouri's mother. Her romantic partner died of an oxycodone overdose in 2006 after naming Darden as beneficiary. A detective wrote it's "possible" she was involved in Eric's death.This is the defense playbook before trial begins.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahTrial #RobertCrozier #DefenseStrategy #WitnessRecantation #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

They're still breathing. Still calling. Still showing up with the same face and a completely different person behind it.And you're not allowed to grieve them.Rob and Michele Reiner watched their son disappear over seventeen years. The Nick who existed at fourteen was gone long before December 14th. But there was no funeral. No acknowledgment. Just a slow-motion vanishing where the person they loved was replaced by someone they couldn't reach — and they had to keep pretending nothing had changed.This is what psychologists call ambiguous loss. When someone is physically present but psychologically absent. It's one of the most difficult forms of grief because there's no closure. No ending. Just an infinite middle where you're suspended between hope and despair, never allowed to fully mourn because they might still come back.That word — might — is a torture device.The Reiners made Being Charlie with Nick in 2015. Press tours about recovery. Father and son healing through art. But Nick admitted later he wasn't sober during any of it. The whole redemption arc was a performance. And Rob and Michele were in the audience believing it was real.Every time you think they've come back, the grief reactivates. Every glimpse of who they used to be makes the absence sharper when it disappears. You keep attending the same funeral without ever being allowed to bury the body.There's no bereavement leave for losing someone to addiction. No cultural framework that says you're allowed to mourn someone who's technically still alive. Just silence and the expectation that you'll keep hoping, keep funding, keep showing up — while carrying a grief nobody can see.The Reiners lived in this grief for almost two decades. They mourned Nick long before they mourned each other.You're allowed to grieve someone who's still breathing. The person you loved existed. Their absence is real. And you don't need a death certificate to acknowledge what you've lost.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerMurders #TrueCrime #AmbiguousLoss #GrievingTheLiving #AddictionFamily #InvisibleGrief #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Sealed court. No public charges. A suspect released to guardian custody. The Anna Kepner case is unfolding almost entirely behind closed doors—and defense attorney Bob Motta explains what that means.Anna Kepner, 14, died aboard the Carnival Horizon in November 2024. The medical examiner ruled it homicide by mechanical asphyxiation—reportedly a bar hold restraint. Her 16-year-old stepbrother appeared in federal court on February 6th, 2025, three months after her death. Everything since has been sealed under federal juvenile protection laws.Bob walks through what actually happens in these sealed proceedings—the courtroom dynamics, the restrictions on information, why federal law treats juvenile defendants differently than adults. He addresses the family's contradictory public statements and explains how little information typically reaches families during federal juvenile cases.The FBI kept this case federal instead of turning it over to state prosecutors. That decision tells us something about how the government assesses the severity. Bob breaks down the factors that influence that jurisdictional call.Text messages from custody proceedings revealed the suspect reportedly claims no memory of the night Anna died. Testimony indicated he had ADHD and was on insomnia medication he allegedly hadn't taken for two nights on the cruise. Bob analyzes whether either factor could support a defense strategy—and the complications that arise.The family dynamic is extraordinary: the suspect's biological mother and the victim's father are married. They've jointly called for accountability. That creates unprecedented complications for defense and prosecution alike.This is what we know, what we can infer, and what comes next.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #SealedCase #FederalJuvenileCourt #CruiseShipDeath #MechanicalAsphyxiation #JuvenileDefense #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Eighteen days after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie was taken from her home in the Catalina Foothills outside Tucson, the evidence the nation was banking on just came back empty. DNA recovered from a black glove found two miles from Nancy's home produced no matches in CODIS, the FBI's national database of over 26 million offender profiles. But the bigger problem isn't the miss — it's the fact that this glove was never the evidence everyone pretended it was.A generic disposable glove found on a desert roadside, visually compared to grainy black-and-white Nest camera footage, elevated to the centerpiece of a national investigation. And now we know the DNA on the glove doesn't even match the DNA found inside Nancy's home. Two separate unknown male profiles. Two dead ends. Meanwhile, the evidence Sheriff Chris Nanos himself says is more critical — biological material recovered from inside the residence — still hasn't been fully processed for database submission.The Pima County Sheriff's Department confirmed investigators are now pursuing genetic genealogy, the same technique that cracked the Bryan Kohberger case. But genealogy takes weeks, sometimes months. For an 84-year-old woman who requires daily medication and has a pacemaker, that timeline is a luxury she may not have.While the glove dominated headlines, a far more significant development went largely unnoticed. A Tucson gun store owner revealed that FBI agents visited his shop with printed pages showing 18 to 24 individuals — photographs and names — asking him to check firearm purchase records. The agent's list featured men with similar physical characteristics matching the suspect profile from the doorbell footage. Yet on Tuesday, Sheriff Nanos publicly denied that investigators have narrowed the suspect pool. The contradiction between what's happening on the ground and what's being said at press conferences tells its own story.Perhaps the most troubling revelation: investigators are only now asking Google to attempt recovery of footage from additional cameras on Nancy's property. The front door camera was recovered from backend systems within the first two weeks. A driveway angle showing a vehicle could change this case overnight. That request should have been made before dawn on February 1st, not discussed publicly as a hopeful possibility on day 18. Parsons Corporation has confirmed its BlueFly sensor technology has been scanning for Nancy's pacemaker signal since February 3rd — by air, by ground, on foot — with no results. Forty to fifty thousand tips. Multiple warrants. Zero arrests. The effort is there. Whether the urgency has matched the moment is a different question entirely.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #CODIS #DNAEvidence #TucsonKidnapping #PimaCountySheriff #GeneticGenealogy #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

No arrest has been made in the Nancy Guthrie disappearance—but defense attorney Bob Motta says the prosecution's case may already be damaged.The Pima County Sheriff's Office reportedly released the crime scene early. Journalists photographed what appeared to be blood droplets on the porch before it was re-secured. Evidence that the FBI allegedly wanted processed at Quantico was sent to a private Florida lab instead. And of the sixteen gloves collected near the home, fifteen were reportedly contamination from the search team itself.These aren't minor procedural issues. They're the foundation of a defense strategy that could create reasonable doubt before opening statements conclude.Bob Motta walks us through how he would attack this case from the defense table. The jurisdictional fight over evidence handling. The contaminated evidence field. The early crime scene release. Each vulnerability represents a line of attack that any competent defense attorney will exploit.We also examine the Derrick Callella situation—charged with transmitting fake ransom demands after allegedly "trying to see if the family would respond." The Friday SWAT operation that detained four people, including a confirmed person of interest, only to release everyone by Saturday morning. And the heartbreaking medical reality that 84-year-old Nancy reportedly needs daily heart medication she hasn't had for over two weeks.Inside sources are reportedly telling media this looks like a burglary gone wrong rather than planned kidnapping. That theory changes everything about charging decisions and legal exposure.When an arrest finally comes, this interview will be essential viewing.#NancyGuthrie #GuthrieCase #DefenseStrategy #CrimeSceneErrors #PimaCountySheriff #FBIQuantico #KidnappingCase #TrueCrimeAnalysis #LegalBreakdown #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

In the week before Mickey Stines shot Judge Kevin Mullins nine times inside a Kentucky courthouse, everyone around him knew something was terribly wrong.He'd lost forty pounds in two weeks. He wasn't sleeping. He was making phone calls to dead relatives. He told staff that shadowy forces were going to kill his wife and daughter. He made someone put a bulletproof vest on his wife. A local attorney warned the judge directly that Stines was "losing it." The police chief said he'd lost his mind.Three days before the shooting, Stines sat for a deposition in a federal lawsuit tied to allegations of sexual exploitation inside the judge's chambers. According to everyone in the room, he was a mess — taking ten breaks, unable to answer basic questions, at one point saying "I'm having an episode."Friends brought him to a doctor the day before. The diagnosis was acute stress. He was sent home. Twenty-four hours later, Kevin Mullins was dead.Today we examine this case through a psychological lens. Not to excuse what happened — nine bullets, seven fired while the judge was already on the ground — but to understand what was happening inside Mickey Stines' head. The defense claims he was in psychosis, that he believed his family was in imminent danger, that he lacked the capacity to intend what he did. The court will decide if that's valid. But the harder question might be this: when everyone can see someone falling apart, whose job is it to stop them?#MickeyStines #KevinMullins #LetcherCounty #KentuckySheriff #CourthouseShooting #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #MentalHealthCrisis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeNewsJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

A retired FBI behavioral expert breaks down the full scope of the Nancy Guthrie case in one interview. The FBI targeted specific January dates in footage requests — suggesting digital evidence already in hand. The suspect knew the target but brought cheap gear and left identifying features exposed. Nancy's predictable routine and employed staff created multiple intelligence access points. Inside the investigation, the sheriff contradicted himself on crime scene handling, searchers contaminated the evidence field, DNA was routed away from Quantico over FBI objections, and investigators told reporters they can't identify a command structure. A male DNA profile from a matching glove is entering CODIS. Cell towers and Walmart records are being analyzed. But through fifteen days, two missed deadlines, and a family publicly offering to pay — no proof of life, no direct contact, no arrest. This interview covers every dimension of the case and asks the hardest questions.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #SheriffNanos #CODIS #FBIInvestigation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonKidnapping #RobinDreekeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The prosecution recommended time served. The judge said no.Juliana Peres Magalhães — the au pair who admitted firing the shot that killed Joseph Ryan while Brendan Banfield stabbed his wife Christine to death — was sentenced Friday to ten years in prison. Judge Penney Azcarate rejected the Commonwealth's recommendation that Magalhães walk free after roughly two years behind bars, delivering instead the maximum sentence available under the plea agreement."You do not deserve anything other than incarceration and a life of reflection on what you have done," Azcarate told Magalhães. "May it weigh heavily on your soul."The judge called this "the most serious manslaughter scenario this court has ever seen" and systematically dismantled any notion that Juliana was merely a passive participant in Brendan Banfield's scheme. She detailed how Juliana spent weeks messaging Joe Ryan, knowing she was luring him to his death. How she waited nearby and alerted Banfield when Ryan arrived. How she hung up when Christine Banfield begged her to call 911. And how she walked up to Joe Ryan as he lay moaning on the floor and shot him point blank in the heart."At any point for at least the month prior — or that day — you could have stopped this. The plan did not work without your full involvement."Joe Ryan's mother delivered a devastating victim impact statement, revealing she still hasn't taken down her Christmas tree since her son's murder — it stands behind the urn holding his ashes. "My son's life was used and thrown away, seen as worthless and utterly disposable."This episode features full analysis of the sentencing hearing, the judge's ruling, and what this means for cooperating witnesses in future cases.#JulianaMagalhaes #BrendanBanfield #AuPairAffair #ChristineBanfield #JosephRyan #FairfaxCounty #TrueCrime #Sentencing #JudgeAzcarate #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The DNA from a glove matching the suspect's is going into CODIS. The FBI's cell tower team is mapping every phone near Nancy's home during the critical windows. Walmart records are being cross-referenced. Cheek swabs from people of interest already exist. A retired FBI behavioral expert walks through every active thread that could produce a name — and confronts what the ransom silence actually means. The first note to KOLD reportedly contained details only someone with inside knowledge would have. But every demand since has gone to media outlets. Two deadlines passed. The family offered to pay. No one collected. No proof of life in fifteen days. Pacemaker helicopters have found no signal in eleven days of searching. This interview asks the question the audience needs answered — what breaks this case and what does the silence tell us?#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #CODIS #DNAEvidence #NancyGuthrieMissing #RansomNote #FBISearch #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonKidnappingJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Eighteen rehab stints. Millions of dollars. A guesthouse on the property. A movie made together about healing. Rob and Michele Reiner gave Nick everything for seventeen years.They never walked away. And they're dead.This episode isn't about blame — what happened is the responsibility of one person alone. But it's about a question that haunts everyone who's ever loved someone dangerous: when does staying become its own form of destruction?We're taught that love means presence. That walking away is abandonment. That good people don't give up. But "unconditional love" got twisted somewhere into "unconditional proximity." They're not the same thing. You can love someone from a distance. You can love someone you'll never see again. You can love someone and still refuse to let them take you down with them.Nick reportedly told his parents that refusing their treatment plans meant homelessness. That was the line. But it never held. Every consequence dissolved. Every ultimatum evaporated. Some people never hit bottom because someone's always there to catch them — and your outstretched hands become the floor preventing the fall that might actually save them.The trap has three parts. Guilt weaponization: your departure becomes the cause of their destruction. Sunk cost: you've invested too much to walk away now. The final save fantasy: what if you leave right when they were finally ready?Rob Reiner brought Nick to a Christmas party because he was reportedly afraid to leave him home alone. A seventy-seven-year-old man couldn't attend a holiday event without his thirty-two-year-old son in tow. That's not supervision. That's hostage behavior.You're allowed to stop. Walking away isn't betrayal — it's the recognition that your presence isn't saving anyone. The Reiners stayed until there was nowhere left to stand.You don't have to.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerMurders #TrueCrime #Enabling #WalkingAway #AddictionFamily #Codependency #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

He admitted releasing the crime scene too early. Then he denied it. The FBI says its access was limited to what the sheriff's office would allow. Searchers contaminated their own evidence field. A forensic genealogy expert called the DNA routing "devastating." And investigators inside the case told reporters they don't know who's in charge. A retired FBI behavioral expert walks through fifteen days of contradictions and command failures in the Nancy Guthrie investigation — from the premature crime scene release and re-securing, to pool cleaners on an active scene, to a pacemaker helicopter delayed by a personal grudge, to DNA routed away from Quantico to a private Florida lab the FBI says it will likely need to retest. NewsNation's FBI source put it plainly: "This is dumb." This interview asks when the pattern crosses from friction into something that's costing Nancy Guthrie her life.#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCountySheriff #NancyGuthrieMissing #FBIvsNanos #Othram #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #InvestigationFailures #TucsonKidnappingJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

One glove. Unknown male DNA. And an investigation that just shifted beneath the surface.Sixteen days after Nancy Guthrie was taken from her Catalina Foothills home, the FBI confirmed that a glove found two miles away contains a DNA profile matching the gloves worn by the suspect in the doorbell footage. That profile is headed to CODIS — but there's no guarantee it returns a name. If the suspect has never been arrested and swabbed, the database returns nothing, and investigators are left with forensic genealogy timelines Nancy may not survive.The evidence handling has been a disaster. Federal sources say Sheriff Nanos blocked the FBI from processing the glove at Quantico. Nanos denies it. The forensic genealogy company Othram called the decision devastating. On Monday, the sheriff's department quietly redirected all evidence questions to the FBI.A CBS 5 reporter says an inside source believes this was a burglary gone wrong. Both agencies denied it. But Robin Dreeke has been reading amateur behavioral markers in the footage on this show for two weeks. Jeff Bennett raised the burglary theory on Day 4 of our coverage. The behavioral evidence was already there.Trump threatened the death penalty Monday. The family has been saying it's never too late to come forward. Those two messages cannot coexist.Helicopters are scanning the desert with signal sniffers trying to detect Nancy's pacemaker. It went silent at 2:28 AM on February 1st and hasn't reconnected. The family has been officially cleared. And the entire case may now ride on whether a glove on a roadside holds enough to identify the person who wore it.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #CODIS #DNAEvidence #SheriffNanos #RobinDreeke #BurglaryTheory #FBIInvestigation #TucsonKidnapping #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI asked Nancy Guthrie's neighbors for footage from two narrow windows — January 11th from 9 p.m. to midnight and January 31st from 9:30 to 11 a.m. — three weeks and hours before she was taken. That specificity tells you investigators already have digital evidence pointing to those moments. A retired FBI behavioral expert examines what those date-targeted requests reveal, what the suspect's exposed mistakes say about who they're looking for, and why Nancy's predictable weekly routine may be the key to understanding how this suspect gathered the intelligence he clearly had.Nancy employed a landscaper, pool crew, housekeeper, and regularly used Uber — all interviewed and DNA-swabbed. A January 23rd Ring video from a home six and a half miles away shows a man with facial hair that law enforcement is reviewing as a potential lead. The doorbell footage shows a suspect who knew enough to target the right house at the right time — but showed up with the wrong holster, cheap gear, no camera cover, and visible facial hair beneath his mask. Fifteen days in, no vehicle has been identified. This interview digs into the behavioral profile, the intelligence question, and what exposed identifying features mean for how quickly this case could break.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #FBIInvestigation #TucsonKidnapping #CatalinaFoothills #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DoorbbellCamera #RobinDreekeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

We gave Robin Dreeke the entire Nancy Guthrie case and asked him to break down what no one else is covering.Three parts. Three angles.The Audience Problem: Eighteen thousand tips from amateur analysts who think watching videos makes them investigators. What mass observation does to a case — to the family, to witnesses, to the perpetrator watching themselves get dissected.The Architecture of Vanishing: How someone disappears in 2026 when cameras are everywhere and digital footprints track everything. The blind spots in surveillance we trust. What this case reveals about the security we assume we have.The People Who Don't Call: The witness who could break this case and hasn't picked up the phone. Why people stay silent. What finally makes them talk. A direct message to whoever out there knows something.Dreeke spent twenty-one years as an FBI Special Agent and served as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. This is the interview that changes how you see everything about this case.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIExpert #FullInterview #SavannahGuthrie #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #MissingPerson #WitnessPsychologyJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The most in-depth analysis of the Nancy Guthrie case anywhere. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Hidden Killers for an exclusive interview breaking down everything we know about the investigation.She analyzes the doorbell video frame by frame — what the suspect's equipment, movement, and improvisation reveal about who they are. She goes inside the manhunt — how the FBI processes eighteen thousand tips, why suspects get detained and released, what the evidence trail looks like. She profiles the criminal operation — what the target selection, logistics, and ransom communication pattern reveal about whoever did this.Twelve days since Nancy Guthrie vanished. No suspect. No arrest. Her family has publicly offered to pay. Coffindaffer spent twenty-two years at the FBI taking down violent criminals. She knows how these cases work — and where they stall. This is the breakdown you haven't heard anywhere else.#NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #FBIBreakdown #JenniferCoffindaffer #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #TrueCrimePodcast #Manhunt #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Five weeks of trial. Less than five hours of deliberation. Guilty on all counts.Paul Caneiro was convicted Friday of murdering his brother Keith, sister-in-law Jennifer, and their children Jesse and Sophia in their Colts Neck home in November 2018. The jury found him guilty on fifteen charges including four counts of first-degree murder and two counts of aggravated arson.The first thing jurors asked for after beginning deliberations was the surveillance footage of Caneiro's Porsche leaving his house and returning on the morning of the murders. Then they asked for the knife used to stab eight-year-old Sophia at least seventeen times. Hours later, they had their verdict.The forensic evidence was insurmountable. Both children's DNA on jeans hidden in Caneiro's basement. Ballistics matching the murder weapon to his home. His own cameras showing him shutting off surveillance at 1:27 AM. Recorded audio of Keith demanding to know where the missing money went — the day before he was killed.The defense blamed a third brother who was never charged. They introduced a two-person conspiracy theory in closing arguments that was never supported by evidence. The jury rejected all of it.Caneiro faces life without parole at his May 12 sentencing. After seven years, the Caneiro family finally has justice.#PaulCaneiro #CaneiroGuilty #ColtsNeckMansion #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast #MansionMurders #NewJersey #KeithCaneiro #SophiaCaneiro #QuadrupleMurderJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Over eighteen thousand tips. A suspect detained and released. A glove found in the desert. FBI Director Kash Patel posting evidence from his personal account. Neighbors asked about trucks while the sheriff says no vehicle of interest exists.On this episode of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer takes us inside the machinery of the Nancy Guthrie manhunt.She explains how the FBI actually processes thousands of tips — who answers the phones, how leads are prioritized, what gets followed up immediately versus what sits in a queue. She breaks down the Carlos Palazuelos situation: detained because his eyes resembled the masked suspect, questioned for hours, home searched under warrant, then released. What does that tell us about where investigators actually stand?Coffindaffer walks through the evidentiary process for the black glove recovered 1.5 miles from Nancy's home and what happens if DNA matches the suspect's profile. She explains why the week-long silence from the sheriff's department is either strategic or concerning. And she addresses the white tent that appeared at Nancy's front door for ninety minutes — then vanished without explanation.Nancy Guthrie has been missing for twelve days. The investigation is massive. But is it making progress?#NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #FBITips #JenniferCoffindaffer #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonArizona #Manhunt #KidnappingInvestigation #TrueCrimePodcast #MissingPersonJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

"I'm petrified of Nick. I think my own son can hurt me."Rob Reiner said that out loud. At a party. Hours before he was killed.This episode isn't about what Nick Reiner allegedly did. It's about the people left behind who saw something coming and couldn't stop it. The specific, isolating guilt of foresight that fails to save anyone.Rob knew. He said it in front of witnesses. Danny Spilar, who roomed with Nick in rehab at fifteen, said he knew immediately who killed the Reiners the moment he heard the news. Multiple people close to the family had the same reaction. The danger wasn't hidden. It was discussed openly, documented over years, visible to everyone paying attention.And it didn't matter.We believe awareness is protection. That seeing danger clearly means we can prevent it. But seeing the train doesn't stop the train — especially when you're standing on the tracks because you love the person driving it.Rob Reiner spent forty years directing films. He understood narrative structure, how stories build toward inevitable endings. He saw exactly where this one was heading. Knowing didn't give him a rewrite. It just meant he watched it coming in slow motion.This is for everyone who's loved someone dangerous enough to see them clearly. Who warned people and watched them do nothing. Who stayed because leaving felt like abandonment. Who carries "I knew" like a confession instead of what it actually is — evidence you cared enough to pay attention when anyone else would have looked away.The person who didn't see it coming grieves cleanly. You grieve while drowning in "I should have." That's not justice. That's just cruelty.Your knowledge was not consent. Your inability to stop it was not permission. You didn't fail. You loved someone through an impossible situation.Put down the guilt. You've carried it long enough.#RobReiner #NickReiner #MicheleSingerReiner #ReinerMurders #TrueCrime #GuiltOfKnowing #SurvivorGuilt #AddictionFamily #LovingSomeoneDangerous #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI released the first visual evidence in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping — six photos and three videos from her doorbell camera showing a masked, armed individual approaching her home the morning she disappeared.On this episode of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer delivers an exclusive tactical analysis of what the footage actually reveals. Not behavioral guessing — tactical breakdown. The loadout choices. The movement. The improvisation. The deliberate camera avoidance. What separates a trained operator from an amateur pretending to be one.Coffindaffer explains the eleven-day process of recovering video from Google's backend systems when the physical camera had been wiped. She breaks down the significance of authorities now requesting neighborhood footage from January 11 — three weeks before Nancy vanished. And she explains how FBI image analysts identified the backpack as an Ozark Trail Hiker Pack from Walmart using grainy black-and-white footage.Nancy Guthrie, eighty-four years old, has been missing for twelve days. Her daughter Savannah Guthrie has pleaded publicly for her return. The video is the biggest lead so far. What is it actually telling investigators?#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #FBIFootage #JenniferCoffindaffer #TucsonArizona #KidnappingCase #DoorballCamera #TrueCrimePodcast #MissingPersonJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The biggest show of force in two weeks—and it produced nothing.Friday night: SWAT raid two miles from Nancy Guthrie's home. Three detained. A "person of interest" questioned at a Culver's parking lot. His Range Rover searched and towed.Saturday morning: Everyone released. No arrests. Sheriff Nanos confirming "no sign of Nancy was found."Then Nanos told the New York Times finding her could take "years."An 84-year-old woman who needs daily heart medication. Missing for sixteen days. And the sheriff is measuring his timeline in years.This episode exposes the dysfunction: FBI and sheriff fighting over which lab processes DNA evidence. Sixteen gloves collected—fifteen discarded by the searchers themselves. The one glove that matters now entering CODIS.Inside sources say burglary gone wrong. The FBI says "myriad of theories." Nobody's on the same page.And Savannah Guthrie, speaking directly to whoever has her mother: "You're not lost or alone. It's never too late to do the right thing."That's an off-ramp for someone in over their head. The question is whether anyone's listening.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingMom #TrueCrime #FBI #SWATRaid #CODIS #DNAEvidence #SheriffNanos #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The South Carolina Supreme Court just held oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's appeal—and it did not go well for the prosecution.On February 11, 2026, all five justices heard arguments on whether Murdaugh deserves a new trial for the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul. What unfolded was a masterclass in appellate pressure. Chief Justice John Kittredge didn't mince words, calling former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill a "rogue clerk" and questioning how a court official could attempt to influence a verdict for personal gain. He pressed prosecutor Creighton Waters on why the state allowed "everything under the sun" when it came to financial crimes evidence, calling the scope "arguably problematic."Justice George James admitted he was "struggling with the logical connection" between Murdaugh's financial misdeeds and the murders. Justice Letitia Verdin pushed on the limits of motive evidence. And in one memorable moment, Waters tried to invoke the movie "Fargo" to explain Murdaugh's desperation—only for Justice John Few to cut him off: "I haven't seen 'Fargo'—get to the point."Defense attorneys Dick Harpootlian, Jim Griffin, and Phillip Barber argued that Hill's comments to jurors—telling them to "watch his body language" and not be "fooled"—violated Murdaugh's constitutional right to a fair trial. They also challenged the admissibility of cell phone data, a blue raincoat with gunshot residue never tied to Murdaugh, and the sheer volume of financial crimes testimony.The prosecution maintained the evidence was "overwhelming" and Hill's remarks were "fleeting." But the justices weren't buying it—at least not easily.There's no timeline for a decision. But after this hearing, the path forward for either side is anything but certain. This episode breaks down everything that happened in that courtroom—and what it means for Murdaugh's future.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #DickHarpootlian #CreightonWaters #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #HiddenKillers

Federal sources say Sheriff Chris Nanos is blocking the FBI from physical evidence in the Nancy Guthrie case — a glove found inside the home and DNA samples routed to a private Florida lab instead of Quantico. An FBI source called the decision "dumb" and "insane." Nanos says it's "not even close to the truth." The FBI hasn't backed his account.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks it all down. The operational difference between Quantico and a contracted lab. What it means when a federal official publicly torches a local sheriff's evidence handling in a kidnapping case. Whether the FBI can force the issue or if they're stuck working under an agency they've accused of blocking access. And the jurisdictional reality — Pima County holds primary authority, and the bureau can only take over under narrow circumstances.Coffindaffer also reads the FBI's latest moves — the updated suspect description from doorbell footage forensics, the thirteen thousand tips, and a surveillance footage request going back to January 1st that suggests investigators believe the suspect may have been watching Nancy's home for weeks. Plus the question no one wants to ask on Day 13: after a contaminated crime scene and evidence the FBI can't touch, what can still be proven?#NancyGuthrie #JenniferCoffindaffer #FBI #ChrisNanos #SavannahGuthrie #PimaCounty #Kidnapping #TrueCrime #Tucson #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The man on the porch is on camera. The question is whether the planning profile matches what you're looking at.Robin Dreeke ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His career was built on understanding the dynamic between the person who directs an operation and the person who executes it. He knows what it looks like when someone acts independently and what it looks like when someone was sent with partial instructions.The footage shows an individual who followed a forensic checklist — mask, gloves, full skin coverage. But he didn't know there was a camera on the front door. His solution was a plant from the garden. We asked Dreeke what that gap reveals about the planning behind this operation. We asked what the sophistication of the operation itself — target selection, camera removal, silent extraction of an 84-year-old who can't walk fifty yards — tells us about whoever planned it, and whether that planning profile matches the person improvising with prairie brush.We asked about the 41-minute timeline gap and what it suggests about coordination during execution. And we asked the question that matters most: when they identify this man, what should investigators and the public watch for to know whether the trail ends with him or leads somewhere else?Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta then breaks down the ransom chaos — multiple notes sent to media outlets, a confirmed imposter already arrested, a family offering six million in Bitcoin, and a president publicly signaling that an arrest may be coming. Motta explains why the ransom landscape is now so contaminated that separating the real from the fake may be nearly impossible. He dissects the FBI's reward language — "and/or the arrest and conviction" — and what it signals about how the bureau views this case.The family says they will pay. The FBI says the decision is theirs. Total silence from the other side.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #SurveillanceVideo #BobMotta #NestCamera #TucsonKidnapping #CatalinaFoothills #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The family says they received a message. The FBI says there's been no verified kidnapper contact. The sheriff said the footage was gone forever. Then it appeared.We asked Robin Dreeke to read every public voice in this case and tell us who's being straight. Dreeke ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His career was determining when communications are authentic, when they're managed, and when silence is the most important signal.We asked him to assess the family's four escalating videos and what the pattern reveals about what they believe is happening versus what's being communicated behind the scenes. We asked about the ransom notes — sent to media outlets, not the family, containing insider details but no proof of life and no way to respond. We asked whether the sheriff's complete reversal on the footage fits a genuine error or deliberate information management. We asked what the FBI releasing evidence through the director's personal X account with no press briefing tells us about their posture.And we asked about the silence after the ransom deadline. No follow-through. No proof of life. No verified contact. We asked Dreeke what that absence reveals about the reality of this situation.Both deadlines have passed. The Bitcoin wallet sits at zero. One ransom demand was already confirmed as a fraud — Derrick Callella of California admitted he sent fake texts just to see if they'd respond. He's been charged federally with no connection to the disappearance.The search radius is not expanding. Septic tank searches. Manholes behind the property. A vehicle towed from the garage. Hours inside the home of Nancy's daughter Annie. No suspects have been named and all individuals are presumed innocent. But the physical footprint tells its own story.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #DeceptionDetection #RansomNotes #FBIAnalysis #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #NarrativeControl #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The DHS warning about Kouri Richins isn't just about her case. It's about what we're missing.America's autopsy rate has collapsed to 8.5%, with natural-looking deaths autopsied just 4.3% of the time. Death certificates are wrong roughly a third of the time. The January 2026 Department of Homeland Security bulletin documented seventeen spousal poisoning cases since 2014 with at least eleven deaths — substances like cyanide, antifreeze, fentanyl, and common eye drops all chosen because they mimic natural illness. DHS specifically cited Richins' upcoming trial as part of this accelerating national pattern.This episode examines three convicted spousal poisoners — James Craig, Lana Clayton, and Stacey Castor — who each nearly escaped detection, and connects their cases to the Richins trial and the systemic failures that let poisoners walk free. The system didn't catch any of them. A person did every time.Richins is charged with aggravated murder in the 2022 fentanyl death of her husband Eric in Kamas, Utah. Prosecutors allege she spiked his cocktail with five times the lethal amount after a failed attempt on Valentine's Day two weeks earlier. The alleged motive: her realty company owed at least $1.8 million while Eric's estate was worth roughly $5 million.The defense says publicity has poisoned the jury pool beyond repair. Judge Richard Mrazik disagreed, denying their second venue change motion after prosecutors pointed to 830 potential jurors who hadn't heard of the case or hadn't followed it. What makes this case so well-known isn't media coverage — it's the allegations themselves. A children's book about grief. A six-page jailhouse letter allegedly laying out fabricated testimony. A drug source who now says under oath he never sold fentanyl at all.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent. Trial begins February 23rd.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillers #SpousalPoisoning #DHSWarning #AutopsyCrisis #JamesCraig #LanaClayton #StaceyCastor #EricRichins #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI released surveillance footage from Nancy Guthrie's Nest camera — six photos and three video clips showing a masked individual at her front door the morning she disappeared. He covered his face. He covered his hands. He covered nearly every inch of skin. Then he reached the front door, found a camera, turned around, and grabbed a plant from the garden to cover the lens.We brought that footage to Robin Dreeke — former FBI Special Agent and chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His career was built on reading people under pressure and predicting what they'll do based on how they move, react, and make decisions when the stakes are highest.Dreeke applies his behavioral framework to that sequence. What do the transition speeds reveal about stress and decision-making? What does the gap between forensic concealment and improvised camera defeat indicate about the person you're looking at? What does a penlight in the mouth instead of a headlamp tell a behavioral analyst? What do reflective jacket elements in a pitch-black community mean?The operation itself required a different level than what this footage shows. A specific target in a dark-sky community with no streetlights. An 84-year-old woman who can't walk fifty yards taken without a trace. Cameras disabled and physically removed. A 41-minute window of precision execution.The FBI released this footage without a timestamp despite a known timeline. The footage was supposed to be gone forever — no subscription, no retained video. It surfaces from residual backend data. Released by Director Patel personally on X with no press briefing. Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker publicly questioned whether this is even a kidnapping.When they identify the man on that porch — and they will — pay attention. Watch whether the trail stops with him or leads somewhere else.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #SurveillanceFootage #NestCamera #TucsonKidnapping #BehavioralPrediction #MaskedSuspect #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Newly released text messages between the parents of Anna Kepner's sixteen-year-old stepbrother reveal what they were really focused on in the hours after her body was found — and it wasn't grief.According to court filings in an ongoing custody battle, the suspect's mother texted that her son "just keeps repeating over and over he can't remember anything." The messages show discussions about keeping things quiet, damage control efforts while an eighteen-year-old girl lay dead. A former sheriff's detective who reviewed the texts said the family ran their own PR department. Both of the suspect's parents have acknowledged in court documents that he is a suspect in the FBI investigation.Anna Kepner was found on November 7th, 2025, stuffed under a bed on the Carnival Horizon cruise ship, wrapped in a blanket and covered with life vests. Her death has been ruled a homicide by mechanical asphyxiation. Three months later, her stepbrother appeared at Miami's James Lawrence King Federal Justice Centre facing multiple federal charges. Anna's father told the Daily Mail he was "unable to confirm or deny" that the charges include murder and rape — directly contradicting preliminary November findings indicating no signs of sexual assault.Behavioral evidence has taken on new weight in light of the potential charges. Court documents reference allegations of obsession, prior physical incidents in the home, and skipped medication on the cruise. Anna's ex-boyfriend's father has stated she was scared of her stepbrother. Her family has publicly accused the suspect's father of interfering with the investigation. Subpoenas have targeted Temple Christian School and Florida DCF.Anna wanted to join the Navy. She went on a family vacation and never came home. Prosecutors reportedly intend to seek adult charges. If granted, the sealed records open.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #HiddenKillers #CruiseShipMurder #FamilyTexts #FBI #JusticeForAnna #HomicideInvestigation #CarnivalCruise #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The predator's greatest advantage has never been strength or speed. It's the fact that most people simply aren't paying attention.This episode is an evergreen examination of how predators operate before they strike — the surveillance phase most people never see, the target selection process that runs on cold risk-benefit analysis, and the insider threat pattern documented across hundreds of FBI cases. We walk through the TEDD framework the U.S. government uses to teach surveillance detection and break down the environmental tells and behavioral cues that precede targeted abductions.The disappearance of Nancy Guthrie provides a real-time case study. The timeline released by the Pima County Sheriff's Office reveals operational precision: doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 AM, a second camera detecting a person with no saved video at 2:12 AM, pacemaker app losing connection at 2:28 AM. Every security system at the property was systematically neutralized. The floodlight was destroyed. The doorbell camera was physically removed. Blood confirmed as Nancy's DNA was found on the front porch. All belongings remained inside.Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke applies his experience as former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program to the forensic questions shaping this investigation. What does the evidence pattern reveal about who committed this crime? What does the systematic targeting of every camera suggest about the perpetrator's knowledge of the property? What does the septic tank search signal about where investigators believe this case is headed?The scene was released after one day. Investigators returned four more times. A rooftop camera was missed for five days. Chain-of-custody breaks from the first week may define whether this case can ever be prosecuted.#NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #AttackCycle #RobinDreeke #FBI #SurveillanceDetection #TargetSelection #ForensicEvidence #TrueCrime #InsiderThreatJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The ransom notes in the Nancy Guthrie case were supposed to be the roadmap. Three identical letters demanding six million dollars in Bitcoin. Grammatically perfect, according to Harvey Levin. Intimate knowledge of Nancy's home. Non-public details about her Apple Watch location, a destroyed floodlight, what she was wearing when she vanished. The FBI took them seriously. But these notes have become the case's central contradiction.Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, analyzed the behavioral profile of this communication. No phone number. No email. No encrypted channel. No way for the family to respond at all. The Monday deadline passed. Six million dollars demanded to no one.The family's posture shifted from demanding proof of life to "we will pay" — with no indication proof was ever provided. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe confirmed the Saturday video was FBI-crafted. CNN's Josh Campbell reported the public plea means there is no private line of communication with anyone claiming to hold Nancy. A second message arrived Friday from a different IP. No demands. No proof of life. KOLD won't even call it a ransom note.Dreeke breaks down what legitimate ransom communication looks like, why this case deviates from every known pattern, and what the behavioral profile suggests about who wrote these letters and why. Meanwhile, Fox Flight Team footage captured deputies probing a septic tank Sunday morning. Saturday night, three hours of forensic photography inside Annie Guthrie's home. Jennifer Coffindaffer called it "evidence extraction."Nancy's pacemaker disconnected February first. She has been without medication since. The official line says no suspects. The ground investigation says something else entirely.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBI #RansomNote #HiddenKillers #SavannahGuthrie #BitcoinRansom #BehavioralAnalysis #TucsonArizona #MissingPersonJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Rob Reiner stood at Conan O'Brien's Christmas party reportedly telling friends his son could hurt him. He went home anyway. Hours later, he and Michele were dead. This episode doesn't ask why Nick Reiner allegedly killed his parents. It asks why they stayed.Eighteen rehab facilities. Sixty thousand dollars a month. Fifteen years of trying. Rob and Michele Reiner did everything addiction experts told them to do — until they stopped. When counselors warned that Nick was manipulating them, they initially complied. Then came a reversal that cost them everything. By 2015, both parents publicly apologized for trusting professionals over their son. They rebuilt reality around Nick being the victim.This is a clinical examination of how narcissistic manipulation and addiction hijack family systems. The morning threat assessments before coffee. The social isolation that happens so gradually you don't notice until everyone's gone. The psychological inversion where you raise legitimate safety concerns and end up apologizing for being unsupportive. Michele Reiner described exactly this pattern publicly. She and Rob came to believe the experts analyzing their son were the problem.We walk through the decision architecture that kept them in danger. The schizophrenia diagnosis that added another layer of complexity. Seventy thousand monthly for psychiatric care. Nick in the guesthouse a hundred feet away. A party full of people who reportedly saw what was coming while his parents saw a bad night, not a breaking point.This episode is essential for understanding how good people with unlimited resources and genuine love can be systematically disabled from protecting themselves. The manipulation mechanics are predictable. The outcomes don't have to be.#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #HiddenKillers #NarcissisticControl #AddictionManipulation #TrueCrimePodcast #ReinerCase #PsychologicalAbuse #FamilyAnnihilationJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The affidavit is public. The autopsy reports are released. And the Michael McKee case just became one of the most forensically and psychologically layered murder prosecutions in Ohio. Spencer Tepe was shot seven times. Monique Tepe was shot nine times. Both had defensive wounds on their hands and arms — they were awake, aware, and fighting when they were killed in their bedroom while their children slept feet away. A full magazine emptied into two people. The violence stayed contained to one room but was explosive enough to exhaust every round. Forensic psychologists recognize that pattern. It's controlled rage — the kind associated with what experts call a "grievance collector," someone who catalogs perceived slights over years until action becomes inevitable. The affidavit supports that profile. Surveillance footage places McKee in the Tepe yard while Spencer and Monique were at the Big Ten Championship game, days before the murders. Witnesses describe threats stretching back through and beyond McKee's marriage to Monique. He allegedly told her he could "kill her at any time" and that she "will always be his wife." Stolen license plates were linked to his vehicle. A silver SUV with a distinctive sticker was tracked between McKee's address, his workplace, and the Tepe home. After arrest, fresh scrape marks appeared where the sticker had been — evidence prosecutors will frame as post-offense tampering. McKee's phone went silent from December 29th through the afternoon of December 30th, covering the estimated time of the murders at 3:50 a.m. The firearm specifications are charged in the alternative — automatic weapon or silencer-equipped firearm — a prosecutorial hedge that defense attorney Eric Faddis says reveals something about the investigation's current limits. McKee was a vascular surgeon licensed in four states. A decade of medical training. A professional who held lives in his hands daily. And according to prosecutors, a man who allegedly spent eight years building toward the night he emptied a magazine into his ex-wife and her husband. Faddis breaks down how prosecutors use historical threat evidence, where digital silence arguments hold up and where they fracture, how alternative firearm charges affect sentencing strategy, and what McKee's not-guilty plea with reserved bond arguments tells us about the defense approach. The autopsy reveals how they died. The affidavit reveals the alleged architecture behind it.#MichaelMcKee #SpencerTepe #MoniqueTepe #TepeAutopsy #McKeeAffidavit #LibertyTownship #ForensicPsychology #DomesticViolence #HiddenKillers #AggravatedMurderJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Federal agents arrived at the home of Annie Guthrie and Tommaso Cioni with forensic extraction equipment. They were the last people to see Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of Savannah Guthrie, before she was taken from her Tucson residence. Investigators confirmed forced entry, DNA evidence at the scene, and ransom notes demanding bitcoin — routed to media outlets rather than the family. The sheriff says no one is a suspect. No persons of interest have been named. More than a hundred investigators are assigned to the case. But the behavioral and legal landscape is far more complex than those statements suggest. The ransom delivery method — bypassing the family entirely and going to TMZ and local stations — creates significant legal exposure for whoever is responsible, whether or not they physically took Nancy. The DNA confirmed at the scene belongs to Nancy, but the sheriff won't specify whether it's blood. That distinction matters enormously. DNA establishing presence carries different legal weight than DNA establishing harm, and the type of biological evidence recovered shapes what charges prosecutors can bring. Pacemaker sync data is being used to establish that Nancy went out of range around 2 a.m. Medical device evidence in a kidnapping case is new legal territory, and how it gets introduced at trial — and where it's vulnerable to challenge — could define the prosecution's timeline. The sheriff initially told NBC that Nancy "was harmed at the home," then walked it back as a misstatement. Defense attorneys notice contradictions like that. They get used in court. The Guthrie family's video statement drew analysis from former federal law enforcement professionals who described it as heavily scripted and strategically directed by authorities. Savannah asked for proof of life and humanized her mother — every line serving an investigative purpose. Meanwhile, a fifty-thousand-dollar FBI reward is active, the president has pledged federal resources, and tips continue to flood in. Nancy requires medication the sheriff described as potentially fatal to miss. Her age, limited mobility, and medical needs elevate sentencing exposure under both state and federal guidelines. Robin Dreeke, former head of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down how investigators behaviorally assess everyone in Nancy's orbit without premature conclusions. Defense attorney Eric Faddis explains what a kidnapping prosecution looks like from both sides and why the jurisdiction question between Arizona and federal courts carries dramatically different consequences.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #FBI #TrueCrime #Kidnapping #PimaCouny #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Eighteen thousand tips. And the one that matters probably hasn't come in yet.Someone out there knows something. A neighbor who saw something. A coworker who's noticed changed behavior. A friend who heard a conversation they've tried to forget. A family member protecting someone they love.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke spent his career getting people to talk. He ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He knows why people stay silent — and what finally makes them pick up the phone.In this interview, Dreeke breaks down witness psychology. The person who doesn't realize their information matters. The person who's scared of getting dragged into something public. The person protecting someone at the cost of their own conscience. Each one requires a different approach.The Guthrie family has released video pleas. They're talking to whoever took Nancy — but there's another audience. The people on the edges who know something. Does that public attention bring them forward or push them deeper into silence?Dreeke speaks directly to whoever's out there with a piece of this. The neighbor. The coworker. The friend telling themselves it's probably nothing. What would it take to get them to call today?#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #WitnessPsychology #TipLine #SavannahGuthrie #WhyPeopleDontTalk #MissingPerson #FBIExpert #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Two cases. One attorney who has prosecuted murder and defended against it. Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers to break down the institutional failures in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping investigation and the aggressive Supreme Court oral arguments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal.In the Guthrie case, eleven days without a suspect have exposed a pattern of decisions by Sheriff Nanos that could compromise any future prosecution — from the premature crime scene release to the five-hour grounding of thermal imaging aircraft to ten days of calling critical footage permanently lost when the FBI found it in backend data. The family is communicating with the alleged kidnappers through Instagram rather than through law enforcement. The FBI released surveillance footage through Director Patel's personal X account. A man was detained in Rio Rico and released without charges. Faddis walks through the legal exposure on both sides — what the investigative failures mean for civil liability and what a prosecutor has to build a chargeable case from.In the Murdaugh appeal, the South Carolina Supreme Court justices directed pointed questioning at the state. Becky Hill's perjury conviction has rewritten the jury tampering issue. The chief justice challenged the state on Rule 404(b) and the unchecked flow of financial crime evidence at trial. With no eyewitnesses, no weapons, and no biological transfer evidence, the defense argues the state's case may not survive if the financial testimony falls. Faddis reads the bench and identifies where this is heading.#NancyGuthrie #AlexMurdaugh #EricFaddis #GuthrieCase #MurdaughAppeal #SheriffNanos #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillersPodcast #InstitutionalFailureJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

We live in the most surveilled moment in human history. Cameras on every doorbell. GPS in every phone. License plate readers on every highway. We're told if you commit a crime, you'll be caught.Nancy Guthrie had a Nest camera. A pacemaker app. Family nearby. And she's gone. Twelve days. No vehicle of interest. No suspects. No trace.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He spent twenty-one years watching people try to move without being detected — and understanding how the gaps in our surveillance architecture get exploited.In this interview, Dreeke breaks down how someone vanishes in 2026. What the blind spots actually look like. What an extraction like this would require. Why there's no confirmed transportation method. And what this case reveals about the difference between the security we assume we have and what actually exists.The public believes surveillance protects us. This case challenges that assumption. Dreeke explains what we're missing — and what it should teach law enforcement about the vulnerabilities we don't see.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #SurveillanceGaps #FBIExpert #HowToDisappear #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #CatalinaFoothills #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

When Justice Toal denied Alex Murdaugh a new trial in January 2024, Becky Hill hadn't been convicted of perjury yet. Now she has — and the South Carolina Supreme Court justices made it clear today that fact matters. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down today's oral arguments and what the bench's aggressive questioning of the state signals about the likely outcome.Justice Few asked Creighton Waters directly how you can label someone "not completely credible" when her own guilty plea proves she's a liar. Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's order never addressed the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony. He called the corroboration between juror accounts and independent witnesses "striking." The defense argues the wrong legal standard was applied — and from the bench, it appeared multiple justices agreed.Kittredge also pressed hard on the financial evidence, telling Waters that Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion and that the trial court couldn't seem to find a reason to keep anything out. Jim Griffin argued this case has no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, and no biological transfer evidence. If the financial testimony falls, the state's case gets very thin.Faddis reads the room and explains which of the three possible outcomes — affirm, new trial, or remand — today's hearing most strongly pointed toward.#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHillPerjury #MurdaughSupremeCourt #JuryTampering #EricFaddis #JusticeKittredge #Rule404b #JimGriffin #HiddenKillersPodcast #MurdaughNewTrialJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Today the South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's appeal of his double murder conviction — and the justices came loaded. The very first question from Justice George James cut straight to a wound the defense has been pressing for two years: why wasn't the egg juror allowed to testify at the 2024 evidentiary hearing? From there, the hearing split into two phases that each delivered major moments. On the jury tampering issue, Dick Harpootlian argued that Becky Hill — the former Colleton County Clerk of Court now convicted of perjury, obstruction, and misconduct — had a financial motive to push for a guilty verdict. Chief Justice Kittredge told the state that Toal's ruling didn't even address the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled. Justice Few challenged Creighton Waters on the absurdity of calling Hill not completely credible while ignoring her perjury conviction. On the evidentiary side, Jim Griffin argued this was never an overwhelming evidence case — no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer evidence on Murdaugh. Kittredge hammered Waters on Rule 404(b), saying the gate to financial crimes evidence was left wide open and he couldn't find a single example of anything that was excluded. When Waters tried to reference the movie Fargo, Justice Few told him to get to the point. The court took the case under advisement. No decision today. Three possible outcomes remain: affirm, new trial, or remand. But what unfolded in that courtroom didn't look like a court preparing to uphold the status quo. This episode covers every key exchange and what it means going forward.#MurdaughAppeal #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #404b #CreightonWaters #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #OralArgumentsJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The prosecution asked for time served. The judge said no.Juliana Peres Magalhães — the au pair who admitted firing the shot that killed Joseph Ryan while her lover Brendan Banfield stabbed his wife Christine to death — was just sentenced to 10 years in prison. Judge Penney Azcarate rejected the Commonwealth's recommendation that Magalhães walk free after roughly two years behind bars.This sentencing hearing delivered the emotional reckoning that many felt was missing from the trial itself. Deirdre Fisher, Joe Ryan's mother, read a victim impact statement that confronted Magalhães directly about the son she lost — an innocent man lured to his death through a fake fetish profile that Magalhães helped create. The Banfield family also addressed the court, acknowledging that Juliana was "a young woman in a foreign country, in love with her employer" while making clear that cooperation doesn't erase culpability.Magalhães spoke before sentencing, telling the court: "I know my remorse cannot bring you peace. I pray for forgiveness, and I have never forgave myself."But remorse wasn't enough.Judge Azcarate's decision sends a clear message: testifying against your co-conspirator doesn't automatically entitle you to leniency. Magalhães admitted to participating in a scheme that ended two lives. She admitted to pulling the trigger on a man who thought he was walking into a consensual encounter. Whatever her cooperation meant for the Banfield conviction, it didn't change what she did that night in February 2023.This episode features the full sentencing audio from the Fairfax County courtroom — including the victim impact statements, Juliana's allocution, and Judge Azcarate's ruling. If you followed the trial, this is the moment where consequences finally arrived.#JulianaMagalhaes #BrendanBanfield #AuPairAffair #ChristineBanfield #JoeRyan #FairfaxCounty #TrueCrime #Sentencing #JudgeAzcarate #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Between 1:47 a.m. and 2:28 a.m., something happened inside Nancy Guthrie's home. The doorbell camera went offline at one end. The pacemaker lost Bluetooth connectivity at the other. That forty-one-minute window is the hardest forensic evidence in this case — and criminal defense attorney Eric Faddis explains what it proves, what it doesn't, and what a prosecutor still needs to connect it to a defendant.The FBI released surveillance footage and says they're searching for more than one individual. Director Kash Patel posted it to his personal X account — no press conference, no briefing, no Q&A. A man was detained in Rio Rico for eight hours and released without charges. His family says the clothing doesn't match. An imposter ransom demand already led to a separate arrest in California. Investigators are now combing roadways near the Guthrie home for items that may have been discarded — eleven days after the disappearance.Faddis, who prosecuted first-degree murder before switching to criminal defense, walks through what a prosecutor is watching for at this stage. The ransom notes sent to media outlets with insider crime scene details create a legal tangle: separating genuine evidence from imposter noise becomes a central challenge, and the defense will exploit every piece of confusion. The Rio Rico detention gives the defense a narrative about misdirected investigators. Late-stage roadside recoveries face weather degradation and chain of custody attacks.Faddis identifies the single most important thing that needs to happen next for a viable prosecution — and the single biggest obstacle in the way.#NancyGuthrie #PacemakerEvidence #41MinuteWindow #EricFaddis #FBISurveillance #KashPatel #RioRicoDetention #RansomNotes #HiddenKillersPodcast #GuthrieCaseJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Everyone's a behavioral analyst now. Eighteen thousand tips have flooded the Nancy Guthrie investigation — most of them wrong, many based on gut feelings from people watching family videos online. Reddit threads are dissecting body language. Comment sections are full of accusations. The entire country has become an amateur investigation unit.Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He spent twenty-one years learning how to actually read people. In this interview, he explains what mass observation does to a case — and everyone caught in it.The Guthrie family knows they're being watched. Every video statement gets torn apart. Every pause analyzed. Every blink interpreted by people with no training. Dreeke breaks down the feedback loop: the public watches, the family becomes self-conscious, their behavior changes, and the public reads that change as suspicious. Innocent people start looking guilty — and investigators have to cut through all that noise to find the truth.Then there's the perpetrator. They're watching too. Seeing the theories, tracking the coverage, reading what people think they know. What does sustained mass observation do to someone trying to stay hidden?This is the conversation about what we're all doing when we obsess over a case like this — and whether the attention helps or makes everything worse.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIBehavioral #InternetSleuths #SavannahGuthrie #BodyLanguage #TrueCrime #MassObservation #TipLineJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

An FBI source told NewsNation it's "dumb" and "insane" — Sheriff Chris Nanos is allegedly blocking federal agents from accessing key evidence in the Nancy Guthrie case, routing a glove and DNA samples to a private Florida lab instead of Quantico. Nanos called the reports "not even close to the truth." But the documented history of this sheriff's credibility tells a very different story.From a 98.8 percent no-confidence vote by his own deputies, to an Arizona Attorney General investigation that flagged four policy violations, to placing his political opponent on leave weeks before an election he won by 481 votes — Nanos has spent years denying what the record confirms. And in the Guthrie case alone, he's admitted to releasing the crime scene early, contradicted himself publicly, grounded his best search aircraft over a personal dispute, and sat courtside at a basketball game while the family begged for Nancy's return.This episode lays out the full pattern — every claim sourced, every quote verified — and asks the only question that matters on Day 13 of this search: whose word has actually held up?#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #FBI #PimaCountySheriff #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #Kidnapping #Tucson #HiddenKillers #ColdCaseJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Eleven days into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie and the Pima County Sheriff's Department is being questioned from every direction — by its own deputies' union, by county supervisors, and by the Guthrie family itself. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the legal damage created by a cascade of documented investigative decisions.The crime scene was released prematurely. Sheriff Nanos admitted it publicly. His department returned to the home multiple times after the initial release to collect additional evidence — each re-entry creating chain of custody problems that Faddis says any defense attorney would seize on at trial. Evidence recovered after a scene is released and potentially accessed by civilians carries a contamination question mark that never fully disappears.The department's thermal imaging aircraft, equipped to detect body heat across the Arizona desert, was grounded for five hours after Nancy was reported missing. The pilot had been reassigned to street patrol by the sheriff months earlier over a personal dispute. The union opposed the move. For an eighty-four-year-old woman potentially in the desert, that five-hour gap is not administrative — it's potentially catastrophic. Faddis explains the legal standard for negligence and whether this specific delay, tied to a specific decision by a specific official, could meet that threshold.The Nest doorbell footage that authorities spent ten days calling permanently unrecoverable was ultimately produced by the FBI from backend server data. Faddis walks through how a defense team would frame that ten-day blind spot — and what it means for every investigative choice made while the department believed its best evidence was gone.The sheriff told NBC News that Nancy was "taken from her bed" and retracted it the next day. Faddis addresses both the legal risks of inaccurate public statements by the lead investigator and what the family's decision to go around the department tells him about the state of this investigation.#NancyGuthrie #GuthrieCase #SheriffNanos #CrimeSceneError #EricFaddis #ThermalImaging #NestCameraFootage #PimaCountySheriff #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimeTodayJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Mickey Stines' defense team just filed a motion that could reshape the entire trajectory of this case. The former Letcher County sheriff, charged with shooting and killing District Judge Kevin Mullins inside his chambers in September 2024, is now claiming he has a serious intellectual disability or serious mental illness that should legally exempt him from execution under a 2022 Kentucky statute.But here's what the motion doesn't include: a diagnosis. No named condition. No medical records attached. Just a legal citation and a request for a hearing. Kentucky's HB 269 requires a documented diagnosis of one of exactly four conditions — schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or delusional disorder — with active symptoms at the time of the offense. The law has been used successfully one time in the state's history, in a case where the judge said the evidence of lifelong mental illness was overwhelming.We go deep on what that precedent looked like, what evidence Stines' defense has assembled so far — including witness accounts of paranoia, a jail evaluation describing active psychosis, and his claim of California encephalitis — and what the prosecution has ready to counter it. The doctor's visit the day before the shooting. The surveillance footage. The sealed psychiatric evaluation that nobody's talking about. And the broader question of whether this motion is about saving Stines from the needle or about building an insanity narrative before a jury is ever seated.This is the legal chess match underneath the case everyone's been watching. And the next move matters.#MickeyStines #ShawnStines #KevinMullins #LetcherCounty #KentuckyMurder #DeathPenaltyDefense #InsanityPlea #CourthouseShooting #HB269 #HiddenKillersJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

We brought Robin Dreeke the footage, the operation, the contradictions, and the silence. We asked him every question this case demands — and his answers are something you need to hear for yourself.Dreeke spent 21 years at the FBI and ran the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. We asked him to apply his behavioral framework to every movement in the surveillance clips and tell us whether the man on that porch matches the operation that happened around him. We asked what the footage reveals about whoever planned this — the target selection, the camera removal, the silent extraction — and what the gap between what this man was told and what he clearly wasn't tells us about whoever was directing him. We asked about the 41-minute timeline gap. We asked what happens when they identify this man.Then we gave him the communications. The family's four escalating videos. The FBI's social media release with no press briefing. The sheriff's complete reversal on the footage. The ransom notes with insider details but no proof of life. The silence after the deadline passed.We asked Dreeke to read every public voice and tell us who's being straight, who's managing a narrative, and what the gaps between statements reveal about where this case actually stands. His answers reframe how you look at everything in this investigation.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIBehavioral #FullInterview #DeceptionDetection #TucsonKidnapping #CatalinaFoothills #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The headlines said Kouri Richins was fighting to move her trial. What they didn't tell you is that fight was already over.Judge Mrazik denied the defense's second venue change request on February 2nd — the same motion Fox News reported on five days later as though it were still pending. The defense argued 85 percent of prospective jurors recognized the case and the pool had shrunk to roughly 72 viable candidates. Prosecutors fired back with different numbers from the same data: 830 potential jurors who said they either hadn't heard of the case or hadn't followed it. The judge sided with the state. Again.But the venue motion may never have been about winning. Look at the defense's broader pattern heading into trial — Crozier's fentanyl recantation, the witness intimidation allegations against Detective O'Driscoll and investigator Hopper, the timeline objections, and now a second failed venue bid. Each motion builds a paper trail. Each denial becomes a potential appellate issue. The question isn't whether the defense expected to move the trial. The question is whether they're already building the record for what comes after a conviction.Meanwhile, the reason this case is famous isn't media hype. It's a children's grief book, a jailhouse letter prosecutors call witness tampering, nearly $2 million in alleged insurance fraud, and a drug chain that's falling apart on the witness stand before trial even begins.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Jury selection begins February 10th.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #HiddenKillers #VenueChangeDenied #WitnessIntimidation #JeffODriscoll #RobertCrozier #FentanylCase #SummitCounty #TrueCrimePodcastJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The ransom deadline passed. No follow-through. No proof of life. No verified contact. We asked Robin Dreeke what that silence means — and it's not the only contradiction we put in front of him.Dreeke ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. His career was reading communications for authenticity and detecting when what people say doesn't match what they know. We asked him to assess every public voice in the Nancy Guthrie investigation.The family has released four escalating videos. The FBI says there's been no verified kidnapper contact. Those two positions exist at the same time. Ransom notes arrived at media outlets with insider details — but no proof of life and no way for the family to respond. The sheriff said the Nest footage was permanently gone. Ten days later the FBI says private sector partners recovered it. The director released it on his personal X account with no press briefing.We asked Dreeke to read each of these. We asked which voices are communicating authentically and which are managing a narrative. We asked what the gaps between public statements reveal about what's actually happening. And we asked what the silence after the deadline tells a deception analyst about whether the ransom threat was ever real.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #RansomDeadline #HiddenKillers #DeceptionDetection #NarrativeControl #FBIBehavioral #RansomNotes #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

The FBI released surveillance footage today from Nancy Guthrie's Nest camera. Six photos. Three video clips. And the most important thing they reveal isn't who is on that porch — it's who isn't. A masked individual walks up to the 84-year-old's front door in the Catalina Foothills outside Tucson, reaches toward the camera, turns around, grabs a plant from Nancy's own garden, and covers the lens. He didn't bring tape. Didn't bring spray. His solution for the camera on the front door was whatever he could pull from the ground. Someone told him to cover his face, his hands, his body. Nobody told him what was six inches from the entry point.The operation around him tells a completely different story. A specific target in a dark-sky neighborhood with no streetlights. Cameras disabled and physically removed. An elderly woman who can't walk fifty yards taken without a trace. A 41-minute window between the camera going dark at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing its Bluetooth connection at 2:28 a.m. That operation required planning, coordination, and knowledge the man on the porch clearly did not have about the camera. The gap between his preparation and the operation around him is the detail this case turns on.The FBI released this footage without a timestamp despite a known timeline with a 41-minute gap at its center. The footage was declared unrecoverable for ten days before appearing today as residual data from backend systems. Director Kash Patel posted it personally on X with no press briefing scheduled. Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker publicly questioned whether this is even a kidnapping. When they find the man on that porch — and they will — watch whether the investigation ends with him or continues past him. That answer tells you who actually matters in this case.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBISurveillance #NestCamera #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CatalinaFoothills #KashPatel #MissingPersonJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.