Podcast appearances and mentions of Bill Gates

Bill Gates allegedly spent years and serious money engineering a “Mr. Rogers” costume to look harmless, using a custom mannequin to test bland sweaters and glasses while his team curated a soft, nerdy brand for a man tied to Epstein, vaccines and global agendas.

For years, Americans have been told the rise of Alpha-Gal Syndrome is simply an unfortunate consequence of tick bites. But what if there are questions nobody wants answered? Today on Stinchfield, we investigate the mysterious explosion of a condition that can leave people allergic to red meat after a bite from the Lone Star tick. Hundreds of thousands of Americans may now suffer from Alpha-Gal Syndrome, yet many still know little about where it came from, why it is spreading, or what researchers knew about the phenomenon before the public ever heard of it. We'll examine the history of government tick research, Cold War biological warfare programs, and why Congress has repeatedly called for answers about whether ticks were ever studied as disease delivery systems. What remains classified? What remains hidden? And what exactly did scientists know about the ability of tick bites to alter the human immune system? Then there is the Bill Gates question. Gates has invested heavily in alternative proteins and has publicly advocated for reducing conventional beef consumption. Gates-backed initiatives have also funded tick research. At the same time, a growing number of Americans are finding themselves physically unable to eat red meat because of Alpha-Gal Syndrome. Is it merely a bizarre coincidence, or does the public deserve a closer look at potential conflicts of interest and the powerful forces seeking to reshape the American food supply? To be clear, there is no public evidence linking Gates to the creation or release of Alpha-Gal Syndrome. But when billionaires, government agencies, and public health institutions all intersect around an issue that affects what Americans can eat, asking questions isn't conspiracy. It's journalism. We're separating fact from fiction and following the evidence wherever it leads. The Lone Star tick. Alpha-Gal Syndrome. Government research. Big money. Big food. And the questions that refuse to go away. Today on Stinchfield. Sponsors The Maverick Systemhttps://TheMaverickSystem.com VRA Insiderhttps://VRAInsider.com Patriot Mobilehttps://www.PatriotMobile.com/Grant TWC Healthhttps://Twc.Health/GrantUse code Grant for 10% off. Lost Soldier Oil and Gashttps://www.LostSoldier.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bill Gates' carefully cultivated public image as a calm, charitable, soft-spoken philanthropist is facing renewed scrutiny as questions around his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continue to follow him. The focus is on how Gates transformed himself from a hard-charging Microsoft executive into a global humanitarian figure, with public relations teams shaping everything from his clothing and media appearances to the tone of his interviews. That polished “Mr. Nice Guy” image is now being challenged by reporting about his Epstein meetings, criticism of his personal conduct, and a growing public suspicion that the friendly billionaire persona was carefully manufactured rather than organic.The broader issue is that Gates' reputation depends heavily on trust, and the Epstein connection damaged that trust in a way philanthropy alone cannot easily repair. Melinda French Gates has previously said his meetings with Epstein were a factor in their divorce, while Gates himself has called those meetings a mistake. The result is a public-relations problem that goes beyond one scandal: it raises questions about elite access, image management, accountability, and how powerful men are able to soften their reputations through philanthropy while uncomfortable parts of their history remain unresolved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Is Bill Gates' Mr Nice Guy image beginning to crack? – Firstpost

The Giving Pledge—founded by Bill Gates, Melinda French Gates, and Warren Buffett—is facing growing backlash as several high-profile billionaires distance themselves from the initiative amid renewed scrutiny over Gates' past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Critics, including Peter Thiel, have mocked the pledge as “Epstein-adjacent,” arguing that Gates' ties to Epstein have tainted the philanthropic effort and damaged its credibility. Some prominent figures, such as Brian Armstrong, have already stepped away, while others have reportedly reconsidered their involvement, viewing the initiative as politically driven and increasingly controversial.Beyond the Epstein-related criticism, the pledge is also under fire for lacking accountability and enforcement, since participants are not legally required to follow through on their commitments and can delay donations for decades. Critics argue that much of the pledged wealth sits in foundations or donor-advised funds rather than reaching active charities, raising questions about the program's real-world impact. While defenders of the pledge point to its global reach and hundreds of signatories, even insiders—including Melinda French Gates—have acknowledged that progress has been uneven and has fallen short of initial expectations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Billionaires bolt from Bill Gates' scandal-scarred Giving Pledge as critics brand it 'Epstein-adjacent'Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Shop my all-natural skincare products at Arvoti.com.Why has the tick population increased so much lately? And what does it have to do with diseases like Alpha-gal syndrome?I keep getting messages asking what I do about ticks on my homestead, and the more I look into this topic, the stranger it gets. Farmers say tick pressure is worse than they've ever seen. Hunters are pulling shocking numbers off of deer. Families find them on their kids after a few minutes outside.Let's dive into why this feels different now, and why I don't think we're getting the full story.In this episode, I cover the Cold War-era research on ticks and other insects as vectors, the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, the 2019 Congressional amendment asking the Pentagon to investigate biological weapons used between 1950 and 1975, and the Gates Foundation funding cattle tick research.Then I share the practical side. Chickens, guinea fowl, land management, a simple essential oil deterrent spray recipe, and the daily habits that keep my homestead in balance without DEET.You'll Learn:[0:00] Introduction[3:27] Why farmers, hunters, and families are all saying this tick year feels different[4:58] What Alpha-gal syndrome actually does to the body after a single tick bite[7:03] Cold War insect research and why the government studied ticks as vectors[9:19] The Plum Island connection and the 2019 Pentagon bioweapons amendment[12:12] Why Bill Gates funding cattle tick research while pushing fake meat doesn't add up[13:48] How disturbed ecosystems and modern toxic load created the perfect tick storm[18:31] Why chickens, guinea fowl, and land management beat any store-bought solution[20:50] The homemade essential oil spray that replaces toxic DEET repellents[27:18] Why two people bitten by the same tick can have completely different outcomesRelated Gubba Homestead Episodes:Natural Flea and Tick Prevention for Dogs: The Terrain Approach Without Toxic PesticidesResources Mentioned:Plum Island Animal Disease Center | WikipediaCattle tick vaccine researchers join forces in CATVAC by Schetters, Theo et al. | ArticleThe Light Bulb Lie: Why They Banned Incandescent Bulbs (And What They Replaced Them With) by Gubba | ArticleFind more from Gubba:Gubba Homestead | X | Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | WebsiteGubba Homestead Products | Shop

The Left is going all in on Texas Senate candidate James Talarico, attempting to portray him as a moderate Texan. But Glenn takes a deep dive into Talarico's past, and previous statements are anything but moderate. Glenn exposes Talarico for being the radical leftist that he is desperately trying to claim he isn't. Glenn also exposes the pro-LGBTQ+ beliefs that his church preaches. Glenn recaps how he grew up to love America and patriotism and reveals a deeply personal story about his family. Glenn passionately explains why America should not be defined by its worst moments, but rather by how America responded to those failures. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Alex Adams joins to discuss how the Trump administration is ensuring no child gets left behind. What is happening with Bill Gates? Glenn breaks down how Gates is using his wealth and PR to reinvent his image as a benevolent hero. Glenn brings in Jason to discuss where America stands in the ongoing conflict in Iran. Will we ever see this conflict end? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Headlines: – Welcome to Mo News + NBA Finals Set (02:00) – Trump Faces Pushback Over America 250 Concert, Kennedy Center, and IRS Settlement (07:15) – California's Governor & LA Mayor Races Feature Unpopular Democrats & Insurgent Republicans (15:30) – Maine Senate Candidate Faces New Scandal Over Explicit Texts (26:30) – Protests Escalate Outside New Jersey Immigration Detention Center (31:00) – Inside Putin's $26B Plan To Live Forever (33:00) – Bill Gates' Image Faces an Epstein Reckoning (36:10) – Meteor Explodes Off Massachusetts's Coast, Boom Heard Across Northeast (40:15) – On This Day In History (43:00) Thanks To Our Sponsors: – Monarch - 50% off your first year | Code: MONEWS – Factor - 50% off your first box | Code: monews50off –⁠ Industrious⁠ - Coworking office. 50% off day pass | Code: MONEWS50 – LMNT | Free Sample Pack with any LMNT drink mix or 12oz cans purchase

Bill Gates' carefully cultivated public image as a calm, charitable, soft-spoken philanthropist is facing renewed scrutiny as questions around his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein continue to follow him. The focus is on how Gates transformed himself from a hard-charging Microsoft executive into a global humanitarian figure, with public relations teams shaping everything from his clothing and media appearances to the tone of his interviews. That polished “Mr. Nice Guy” image is now being challenged by reporting about his Epstein meetings, criticism of his personal conduct, and a growing public suspicion that the friendly billionaire persona was carefully manufactured rather than organic.The broader issue is that Gates' reputation depends heavily on trust, and the Epstein connection damaged that trust in a way philanthropy alone cannot easily repair. Melinda French Gates has previously said his meetings with Epstein were a factor in their divorce, while Gates himself has called those meetings a mistake. The result is a public-relations problem that goes beyond one scandal: it raises questions about elite access, image management, accountability, and how powerful men are able to soften their reputations through philanthropy while uncomfortable parts of their history remain unresolved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Is Bill Gates' Mr Nice Guy image beginning to crack? – FirstpostBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This episode continues our investigation into the implications of advanced AI for jobs, and specifically, how to design an economic system that makes a huge success of full automation by AI.Back in 2017, Bill Gates mused that governments should address radical automation by taxing robots. Gates may not have known it at the time, but he was suggesting a Pigouvian tax. In a 1920 book called “The Economics of Welfare”, Arthur Pigou proposed levying taxes on activities that generate negative externalities — costs on third parties to a transaction. The classic example of that is pollution: a factory produces goods but creates pollution. The market price of the goods doesn't reflect the pollution costs, so the factory managers don't try very hard to minimise them.A Pigouvian tax adds the social cost of the pollution into the price, so the producer is incentivised to minimise it.Gerry Tsoukalas and Brett Falk have published a well-received paper called “The AI Layoff Trap”, which recommends introducing a Pigouvian tax on automation that eliminates human jobs. Their proposal deserves credit for taking seriously the idea that AI may well cause severe automation, perhaps full automation – i.e. the Economic Singularity.The paper describes how firms face a prisoner's dilemma. If they automate all their jobs then there will be no consumers to pay for any of their products. But if any of them don't, their automating competitors will drive them out of business. Tsoukalas and Falk point out, counter-intuitively, that the fiercer the competition, the more acute the dilemma, so if we want to hold back automation, we might be better off with monopoly-ridden economies. Selected follow-ups:Gerry TsoukalasBrett Hemenway FalkThe AI Layoff Trap - The Wharton School Research PaperPDF of the AI Layoff Trap paperArthur Pigou - WikipediaPrisoner's dilemma - Wikipedia"Microsoft AI chief gives it 18 months—for all white-collar work to be automated by AI""Chinese court rules firms can't lay off workers on AI grounds"Music: Spike Protein, by Koi Discovery, available under CC0 1.0 Public Domain DeclarationC-Suite PerspectivesElevate how you lead with insight from today's most influential executives.Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

"Take the Dough, We Gotta Know" is the name of a bipartisan bill requiring more oversight into the controversial EdChoice voucher program. But will it go anywhere with mere days until summer recess?Ohio doesn't have enough oversight into EdChoice, the state-funded program giving families vouchers for their kids to go to private K-12 schools, according to two state lawmakers who say they want to change that.Senate Bill 443, introduced last Wednesday by Sen. Bill Blessing (R-Colerain Twp.) and Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid), would establish a dozen new accountability measures.Data centers in Ohio will no longer enjoy a key tax break at least for now.The pause, announced by Gov. Mike DeWine comes as lawmakers discuss the industry's future here.As resident anger over data centers builds and lost revenue from combined incentives tops $1 billion, which is far more than was previously known.A pastor turned Ohio lawmaker pushes a bill named for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.The Ohio Supreme Court weighs in on a massive solar project in Madison County on land partially owned by Bill Gates.Calling all STEM students: the state has $26 million in college scholarships for you.We're digging into all of these topics on this week's Reporter Roundtable.Guests:Sarah Donaldson, reporter, Ohio Public Radio Statehouse News BureauLaura Hancock, politics and policy reporter, Cleveland.comJake Zuckerman, reporter, Signal Ohio

Congressional Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a set of 19 photos from a larger trove of over 95,000 images obtained from Jeffrey Epstein's estate, aiming to shed light on his social connections. The photos include well-known figures such as President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Steve Bannon, Larry Summers, Woody Allen, and Prince Andrew, often shown in social settings with Epstein or others; some images show Trump with unidentified women whose faces are redacted and others depict social scenes on jets or at events. None of the released photos directly show criminal acts, and their context and dates are not provided, but Democrats argue they raise important questions about Epstein's associations with powerful individuals and call for fuller transparency as part of a broader investigation. The release is part of an ongoing effort by lawmakers to review and make public materials from Epstein's estate and related government files.The photo release has quickly become political: **House Democrats say the images underscore a need to end what they call a “cover-up” and demand that the Department of Justice release the full set of Epstein files under the recently passed Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires federal release of related documents by a mid-December deadline. Republicans and White House officials have criticized the release as selective and politically motivated, accusing Democrats of cherry-picking photos to create a narrative rather than present an objective record, and emphasizing that the photos do not demonstrate wrongdoing by anyone pictured. The disclosures have reignited public debate over Epstein's network and the extent of powerful people's associations with him, even as broader document releases and further image batches are expected in the coming weeks.to contact me:Disturbing photo on Epstein's desk sparks horror over 'incapacitated young girl passed out on couch' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On the latest episode of Tin Foil Hat, Sam welcomes back Greg Carlwood of The Higherside Chats for a wild conversation covering the death and legacy of Gordon White, "The Great Tick-Spiracy," Bill Gates theories, Alpha-Gal syndrome, and fears surrounding engineered bio-events. The guys also dive into looming "Supply Shock 2027" scenarios tied to the Strait of Hormuz, Bob Greenyer and the Brotherhood of Sacred Math, and how the growing parallel economy could become an "abundance engine" for people looking to build outside collapsing systems.   Please subscribe to the new Tin Foil Hat youtube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@TinFoilHatYoutube   Sam Tripoli's 5th Crowd Work Special "Hero Live From Batavia" Drops May 2nd On Youtube.com/SamTripoliComedy   Grab your copy of the 2nd issue of the Chaos Twins now and join the Army Of Chaos: https://bit.ly/415fDfY   Check out Sam "DoomScrollin with Sam Tripoli and Midnight Mike" Every Tuesday At 4pm pst on Youtube, X Twitter, Rumble and Rokfin! Join the WolfPack at Wise Wolf Gold and Silver and start hedging your financial position by investing in precious metals now! Go to https://www.samtripoli.gold/ and use the promo code "TinFoil" and we thank Tony for supporting our show.   Grab Tickets To Sam Tripoli's Live Shows At SamTripoli.com: Costa Mesa, Ca: 5/28  La Jolla, Ca: 5/29-5/30 Albuquerque, NM: 6/12-6/13 Austin, TX: 6/18 Miami, Fl: 7/31-8/1 Lawerence, KS: 9/17-9/19 Tulsa, OK: 10/9-10/10 Dallsa, Tx: Nov 7th (TrutherCon) Austin, TX: Dec 11th-13th   Please check out Word War Debate and the WordWarDebate Contenders Series: https://wordwardebate.com   Please check Greg Carlwood's internet: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/HighersideChats Website: https://www.thehighersidechats.com Twitter: https://x.com/HighersideChats Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/highersidechats       Please check out Sam Tripoli's internet: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/samtripoli Sam Tripoli's Stand Up Youtube Page: https://www.youtube.com/@SamTripoliComedy Sam Tripoli's Comedy Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/samtripolicomedy/%20P Sam Tripoli's Podcast Clip Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/samtripolispodcastclips/   Please support our sponsors: HIMs: When thinning starts, it's not just your hair that takes a hit — it can change how you feel day in, day out. Hims makes it simple to take control of hair regrowth with personalized care that fits your life. For simple, online access to personalized and affordable care for Hair Loss, ED, Weight Loss, and more, visit Hims dot com slash TINFOILHAT.That's Hims dot com slash TINFOILHAT for your free online visit.   Taskrabbit: Taskrabbit connects you with trusted local Taskers for moving, furniture assembly, home repairs, yard work, mounting, and more. Easily find help based on price, skills, availability, and reviews. Get $15 off your first task with promo code TINFOIL on the Taskrabbit app or at Taskrabbit dot com. Book today before Taskers fill up! StoryWorthy: Most Father's Day gifts end up forgotten in a drawer, but Storyworth gives Dad something meaningful that lasts forever. Each week, he gets a question about his life and can answer by email, voice recording, or even a guided phone call — no apps or tech headaches. After a year, Storyworth turns his memories, stories, and photos into a beautiful hardcover book your family will treasure for generations. Give Dad a gift that captures who he really is and save up to $20 right now at STORYWORTH dot com slash tinfoil.  

Michael Wolff and Joanna Coles trace the panic, paranoia, and raw volatility swirling around Donald Trump as he insists he “doesn't care” about the midterms while privately sounding trapped, furious, and increasingly dangerous. From comparisons to Stalin's inner circle and the cult-like loyalty inside Trump's cabinet, to the political gamble of backing scandal-plagued Ken Paxton in Texas, the episode dives deep into a presidency that appears to be running on grievance, chaos, and reality-show instincts. They unpack Trump's escalating obsession with E. Jean Carroll as the Justice Department targets her after she beat him twice in court, explore how Iran may be outmaneuvering him in the Strait of Hormuz crisis, and examine why Trump's promise to avoid endless wars is collapsing in real time. Plus, Michael reveals another surreal chapter from his Jeffrey Epstein encounters involving Bill Gates, billionaire fantasies, and the strange power games unfolding inside Epstein's Manhattan mansion. Visit https://ffrf.us/TRUMP or text TRUMP to 511511 to learn more and join. #ad Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein's social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein's proximity to influential circles.The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein's longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein's social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents' recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00090773.pdf

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein's social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein's proximity to influential circles.The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein's longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein's social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents' recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00090773.pdf

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein's social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein's proximity to influential circles.The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein's longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein's social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents' recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00090773.pdf

And Another Thing With Dave, by Dave SmithListener discretion advised — this episode contains strong language and highly controversial opinions.In this fiery and wide-ranging episode of And Another Thing with Dave, host Dave Smith delivers a passionate wake-up call on multiple fronts that he believes threaten humanity and American sovereignty.Dave warns about the dangers of occult practices and “magic” — opening Pandora's box by inviting uncontrollable entities for fame and wealth. He draws parallels to reckless experiments like CERN's supercollider, Fauci's gain-of-function research, Bill Gates' GMOs, and the unchecked rise of AI.The conversation heats up around toxic “biosolids” (treated human fecal matter full of pharmaceuticals) being used as fertilizer on Texas farms, destroying livelihoods, poisoning soil, and contaminating groundwater. Dave calls this deliberate biological warfare on the food supply and ties it to massive data centers (like the proposed Utah project) that will consume millions of gallons of water daily while creating toxic sludge.Additional hard-hitting topics include:Cultural degeneracy, drag queen storytime, and sexualization of children in schools“Zionist-occupied government” infiltration (citing Congressman Thomas Massie)Alleged IDF atrocities, psychological warfare, and spiritual critiquesThe need for Americans to take local action, run for office, and replace corrupt officialsEmbracing Jesus' teachings, rejecting distractions, and choosing action over reactionRaw, unfiltered, and intense, Dave urges listeners to do their own research, connect the dots, and resist what he sees as coordinated attacks on farmland, water, culture, and freedom.#Biosolids #HumanPoopFertilizer #DataCenters #AIWaterCrisis #OccultMagic #CERN #ZionistOccupiedGovernment #ThomasMassie #TexasFarms #FoodSupplyAttack #CulturalDegeneracy #WakeUpAmerica #AndAnotherThing #DaveSmith #Agenda2030 #PandorasBox #GreatReset #aatwd #AATWD

What happens when you let technology take over your life? Joanna Stern (Fmr. Wall Street Journal / New Things) found out. She spent all of 2025 letting the robots in: Waymos, AI therapists, robot massagers, assistant researcher agents…During that yearlong experiment, Joanna Stern chronicled her findings in a new book, I Am Not a Robot: My Year Using AI to Do (Almost) Everything. She speaks to Oz about letting AI diagnose her son’s praying mantis, sending Bill Gates her health log, and how she sees AI impacting the job market. Additional Reading: I Am Not A Robot | Joanna Stern EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/techstuff Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump's Billion Dollar Ballroom is a familiar kind of corruption, but his slush fund to pay the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name is an unprecedented attack on democracy. Rob Weissman of Public Citizen explains, and also talks about the immense, and immnsely unpopular, proposed Arc d'Trump.Also: Bill Gates was once the country's youngest billionaire and the first billionaire to come from tech. Then he became the most hated man in America; then the biggest philanthropist, and the world's most admired man. Then we learned of his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Ben Tarnoff explains how all happened.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

We sat down with Dr. Troy Spurrill to discuss Alpha-Gal, the tick-borne condition making Americans allergic to red meat, and the growing questions surrounding Bill Gates, ticks, and the war on meat. Dr. Spurrill shares what he has seen in his own practice, including whether Alpha-Gal can be reversed, how people can prepare their bodies, and what steps may help prevent tick-related illness before it starts. From Lone Star ticks and immune system health to gut issues, sleep, copper, zinc, and spiritual discernment, this conversation gives viewers a hopeful path forward in the middle of a concerning health trend.TO WATCH ALL FLYOVER CONTENT: www.theflyoverapp.comFollow and Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheFlyoverConservativesShowDr. Troy Spurrill is the founder and CEO of Synapse Center for Health and Healing.  He started Synapse over 26 years ago with a vision to bring an integrative approach to healthcare through functional medicine, making Synapse an internationally known center for true health.He received a Bachelor's of Science in Molecular Biology from the University of Manitoba, and a Doctorate of Chiropractic from Northwestern Health Sciences University.  He has extensive training in Functional Neurology, Nutrition, and Applied Kinesiology. Dr. Troy is an author and international lecturer on wellness and brain based healing.  Dr. Troy SpurrillWEBSITE: www.officialsynapse.com -------------------------------------------

In the sketch, Adam Driver appears as Jeffrey Epstein in Hell, sharing space with other controversial public figures—one being Alan Dershowitz (played by Jon Lovitz). The setup is absurd and dark: Dershowitz is preparing his impeachment defense when he ends up transported to Hell, where he is greeted by Epstein, who greets everything with an unnerving nonchalance, saying he's “just hanging” in Hell, a grim reference to Epstein's death by suicide in prison. The sketch mingles satire with shock, using the ludicrous setting to comment on how scandal, power, denial, and guilt function in public lifeThe cold open also includes other figures in Hell—Mitch McConnell, Flo from Progressive, the “Baby Shark” songwriter, etc.—turning the scene into a weirdly populated waiting room of immoral celebrity and public scandal. There are jokes about conspiracy theories around Epstein's death, with Epstein quipping “I wish you could have been there in person” after Dershowitz complains about missing something, and Epstein responding “Yeah, it's too bad I was murdered.” The tone is uncomfortable comedy: it forces laughter but also forces audience to think about the real grotesque elements of the Epstein scandal—death, power, impunity.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/01/26/snl-cold-open-alan-dershowitz-reunites-with-just-hanging-jeffrey-epstein-in-hell/amp/

The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein's behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein's wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein's behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein's wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

Newly surfaced FBI material indicates that Jeffrey Epstein may have played a role in introducing Melania Trump to Donald Trump, directly contradicting prior public denials that any such connection existed. The information suggests that Epstein's social network extended into the circumstances surrounding how the two met, raising questions about earlier efforts to distance that relationship from him. This contradiction has intensified scrutiny, particularly as officials and public figures continue to push narratives that minimize or deny Epstein's proximity to influential circles.The information traces back to an FBI FD-302 interview with Adriana Ross, one of Jeffrey Epstein's longtime associates, in which she described elements of Epstein's social orbit and interactions with high-profile figures. In that interview summary, Ross allegedly indicated that Epstein had a role in facilitating the introduction between Melania and Donald Trump, placing him closer to that moment than publicly acknowledged. Because FD-302s are internal FBI records that capture agents' recollections of witness statements rather than verbatim transcripts, the account reflects what Ross told investigators at the time, adding a layer of evidentiary significance while still leaving room for interpretation and dispute.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00090773.pdf

In her formal response to the government's motion, Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in her criminal case, arguing that such a release would violate long-standing principles of grand jury secrecy and unfairly prejudice her rights. Her legal team emphasized that the transcripts in question contain sensitive testimony and confidential material that should remain protected under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Maxwell's attorneys insisted that the government's request lacked compelling justification and that releasing the materials would serve no legitimate public interest while potentially influencing public perception and undermining her right to a fair trial.Furthermore, Maxwell's response accused the government of attempting to circumvent established legal norms for tactical purposes. Her defense argued that any disclosure could taint potential jurors and further inflame the already intense media scrutiny surrounding her case. They maintained that the government had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances to override the presumption of secrecy traditionally afforded to grand jury proceedings. In closing, Maxwell's team urged the court to deny the motion and preserve the confidentiality of the grand jury materials to uphold judicial integrity and due process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.803.0.pdf

Jeffrey Epstein's original prosecution in Florida was a catastrophic failure of justice shaped by power, wealth, and political influence. Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer possessed overwhelming evidence from police investigations, yet instead of filing state charges, he deferred to federal authorities—effectively handing Epstein a lifeline. What followed was a “sweetheart” deal: a 13-month sentence in a county facility that allowed daily work-release privileges, private transport, and minimal oversight. Palm Beach Sheriff Ric Bradshaw's office and state probation officers treated Epstein not as a felon but as a VIP, ignoring repeated violations and complaints that he continued his predatory behavior during supposed supervision. Local law enforcement who built the case were left outraged as prosecutors, probation staff, and administrators enabled a predator to operate freely under the guise of punishment.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Palm Beach police report reads like the opening chapter of a crime saga everyone wishes had ended sooner. In painstaking detail, investigators laid out how Jeffrey Epstein operated a revolving-door abuse scheme out of his Palm Beach mansion—recruiting underage girls, often as young as 14, under the guise of “massages,” then paying them cash after sexual assaults. The report makes clear this was not a one-off or a misunderstanding; it documents dozens of consistent victim statements, matching descriptions of the house, the routine, the money, and Epstein's behavior. Detectives noted the sheer volume of victims, the striking similarities in their accounts, and the methodical nature of the abuse—painting a picture of a predator who acted with confidence, repetition, and a belief he would never face consequences.What makes the report so haunting is not just what Epstein did, but how unmistakably obvious it all was. The Palm Beach Police Department concluded there was overwhelming probable cause for felony sex crimes, emphasizing that Epstein's wealth, influence, and legal maneuvering stood in sharp contrast to the credibility and courage of the girls who came forward. The document reads less like a mystery and more like a warning flare—one that spelled out the scope of the abuse long before the world was forced to confront it. In black and white, the report shows that the truth was there early, detailed, and undeniable—raising the uncomfortable question of why it took so long for justice to even begin catching up.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

In 2013 the anthropologist David Graeber examined one of the strangest contradictions in modern capitalism: despite exponential gains in productivity, people were working even harder that ever. In his landmark essay called “On the Preponderance of Bullshit Jobs” and then a book a few years later, Graeber showed how as much as 37% of all jobs in capitalist societies are, well, bullshit. Or, to use his own words “where even the person doing the job secretly believes the job really shouldn't exist.(...) But nonetheless, part of the conditions of employment is that you have to pretend that it does.”Graeber wasn't the first to notice the problem. Back in 1930 the economist John Maynard Keynes predicted that ever-increasing industrial output from factories would make it possible for everyone on earth to work 15 hours a week. Within a few decades the economy met his expectations, but people's workloads didn't get lighter. Fast forward to today, and the question of Bullshit jobs is once again on everyone's lips. Everyone from Bill Gates to Sam Altman and Elon Musk have heralded AI as the new harbinger of the 15 hour work week. After all, the very things that AI is supposedly good at—getting rid of menial intellectual labor and automating digital tasks—are exactly the sorts of things that will get automated away.But here's the thing, what if bullshit work isn't a bug in industrial captialsim? But that it is it's key feature?In this week's video I dig into why Bullshit work is almost definitely here to stay despite the promises of tech barons.

In its letter to Judge Paul Engelmayer, the Department of Justice argued aggressively against the appointment of a special master, framing the request as unnecessary, disruptive, and legally unjustified. DOJ claimed it was already fulfilling its obligations to review, process, and release Epstein-related materials in accordance with court orders, established procedures, and internal safeguards. The department leaned heavily on institutional deference, insisting that prosecutorial discretion and executive-branch authority over evidence review should not be second-guessed by an outside overseer. DOJ further warned that inserting a special master would slow the process, create confusion, and risk improper disclosure of sensitive materials, including grand jury information, law-enforcement techniques, and third-party privacy interests. In essence, the letter positioned DOJ as both referee and scorekeeper, arguing that the court should simply trust that the same institution that mishandled Epstein for years was now acting in good faith.What makes the letter striking is how completely it sidesteps the core reason a special master was proposed in the first place: DOJ's own credibility problem. Rather than directly addressing documented delays, redactions, contradictions, and shifting explanations surrounding the Epstein files, the department defaulted to procedural defensiveness and abstract warnings about efficiency and separation of powers. The letter reads less like a transparent explanation and more like a preemptive shield against scrutiny, treating oversight itself as the threat rather than the history of secrecy and failure that prompted it. DOJ did not meaningfully grapple with the public interest at stake or the extraordinary circumstances of a case involving systemic non-prosecution, political sensitivity, and proven institutional breakdowns. Instead, it asked the court to accept assurances at face value, effectively arguing that accountability would be more dangerous than opacity—an argument that, given the Epstein record, lands with all the credibility of a pinky swear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:opposition-letter-ghislaine-maxwell-khanna-massie.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Alan's Soap https://AlansSoaps.com/ToddHonor John's memory and the legacy he created for Ian and Alan with Alan's Artisan Soaps “John's Favorites” bundle.  Get one bar of each of his favorites for only $28.99. Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comBe confident in your portfolio with Bulwark! Schedule your free Know Your Risk Portfolio review. Go to KnowYourRiskPodcast.com today. Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/Todd Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/ToddGet the new limited release, The Sisterhood, created to honor the extraordinary women behind the heroes. Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubeOver the weekend, I was asked my thoughts on the tick situation in the midwest. Let's consult our dear friend Pattern Recognition to help answer that question...Episode links:JOE ROGAN: “The tick thing is nuts...” TIM BURCHETT: “Because of Bill Gates.” ROGAN: “Farmers and ranchers are finding boxes of ticks on their property. I have a good friend who got bit by the Lone Star tick and has that alpha-gal problem... It makes your body allergic to red meat.” BURCHETT: “And who has got genetically made meat now?” ROGAN: "Bill Gates?" BURCHETT: "Bill Gates."Lyme disease has afflicted 15% of residents in Nantucket, Massachusetts. The tick-borne illness is found primarily in the Northeast, but it's spreading across the U.S.NBC News is now making videos “Debunking the tick conspiracy theory”THE ENERGY STAR SCAM IS OFFICIALLY BUSTED - They've been plastering “Energy Star” stickers on your fridge, washer, and AC for decades — promising massive savings, lower bills, and “saving the planet.” It's all a sham. Watch this brand-new Energy Star fridge get absolutely destroyed by an unrestored 86-year-old fridge that's twice its size.The World Economic Forum is now calling for millions of cats and dogs worldwide to be killed in an attempt to reduce the carbon footprint that they produce as a result of eating meat.One of the largest raw dairy farms in America was told to lie on their raw cheese label by the FDA They were told to pasteurize the cheese then put “raw” on the label. The FDA has been telling other brands to do this, and it's true. He shows proof with examplesNicholas Hulcher: “The U.S. Army released 282,800 radioactive ticks into Virginia & Montana to see how far & how fast they'd spread for biowarfare purposes. That includes 152,000 Carbon-14 tagged Lone Star ticks. This was in the 1960s.”CONFIRMED: Robert Malone to Chanel Rion — YES, the U.S. Government dropped Radioactive Ticks on AmericansHANTAVIRUS “OUTBREAK” IS A FULL-SCALE PSYOP. Look at this footage from the MV Hondius off Cape Verde.

A federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff's lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that Wolff's approach was procedurally improper, calling it a “contorted” effort and saying federal courts do not exist to referee a pre-lawsuit battle in that manner. Wolff had argued that Melania Trump's legal threats were meant to intimidate critics and chill speech, while her lawyer said his statements caused reputational and financial harm and demanded retractions.The underlying dispute centers on Wolff's comments about Melania Trump, Donald Trump, and Epstein's social orbit, including remarks that were later used in a Daily Beast story the outlet retracted after legal pressure. Wolff maintains that his statements were either taken out of context, protected opinion, or did not accuse Melania Trump of criminal involvement in Epstein's crimes. Melania Trump has forcefully denied any association with Epstein and framed the claims as defamatory lies. The judge did not decide whether Wolff defamed her; instead, she dismissed his preemptive lawsuit and left any future defamation fight to proceed through the ordinary legal process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge throws out Michael Wolff's lawsuit against Melania Trump

Alex Acosta is frequently singled out as the architect of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution agreement (NPA), but mounting evidence suggests that he was more of a functionary than a decision-maker. As the U.S. Attorney in South Florida, Acosta did sign off on the sweetheart deal that allowed Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and serve minimal time in a county jail. However, emails and DOJ records show that once Epstein's legal team escalated their complaints, the matter was kicked up the chain of command to Washington. Acosta even reportedly told the Miami Herald that he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that backing off was not a choice, further muddying the narrative that he acted independently. The DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility later criticized Acosta's judgment but stopped short of alleging misconduct.The real power players behind the Epstein NPA appear to have been then–Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip. When Epstein's lawyers petitioned to have the case reviewed, DOJ officials in D.C.—including those in the Criminal Division and the Deputy Attorney General's office—were briefed and ultimately approved the non-prosecution path. In other words, the final green light came from the top of the Justice Department, not Acosta's office alone. This recontextualizes the NPA as less a rogue local failure and more a coordinated decision at the highest levels of federal power. The narrative that Acosta alone bears the weight of the Epstein scandal not only oversimplifies the truth—it protects the very people who had the authority to stop it and didn't.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/top-doj-officials-okd-epstein-deal-maxwell-lawyers/

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn't justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.Even more damning was Acosta's insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he'd been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn't justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.Even more damning was Acosta's insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he'd been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn't justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.Even more damning was Acosta's insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he'd been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdf

A federal judge dismissed Michael Wolff's lawsuit against Melania Trump, rejecting his attempt to preemptively block or neutralize a potential $1 billion defamation suit from the first lady over comments tying her to Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that Wolff's approach was procedurally improper, calling it a “contorted” effort and saying federal courts do not exist to referee a pre-lawsuit battle in that manner. Wolff had argued that Melania Trump's legal threats were meant to intimidate critics and chill speech, while her lawyer said his statements caused reputational and financial harm and demanded retractions.The underlying dispute centers on Wolff's comments about Melania Trump, Donald Trump, and Epstein's social orbit, including remarks that were later used in a Daily Beast story the outlet retracted after legal pressure. Wolff maintains that his statements were either taken out of context, protected opinion, or did not accuse Melania Trump of criminal involvement in Epstein's crimes. Melania Trump has forcefully denied any association with Epstein and framed the claims as defamatory lies. The judge did not decide whether Wolff defamed her; instead, she dismissed his preemptive lawsuit and left any future defamation fight to proceed through the ordinary legal process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge throws out Michael Wolff's lawsuit against Melania Trump

Sarah Kellen Vickers, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime assistant and one of the women named in his 2007 non-prosecution agreement as a potential co-conspirator, reportedly told congressional investigators that she was not an accomplice in Epstein's abuse operation but one of his victims. In closed-door testimony before the House Oversight Committee, Kellen denied helping Epstein traffic or abuse girls and instead described herself as someone who was sexually and psychologically abused by Epstein for more than a decade. She claimed Epstein manipulated, controlled, and “gaslit” her, and she pushed back against the long-standing public portrayal of her as a key operator inside his network. Her account attempts to recast her role from suspected facilitator to exploited subordinate, arguing that she lacked real power inside Epstein's orbit and was trapped by dependence, coercion, and abuse.The testimony is significant because Kellen has long been treated as one of the most important unanswered figures in the Epstein case: she worked close to Epstein, was accused by victims of helping arrange encounters, and was shielded from federal prosecution by the controversial Florida deal that protected named and unnamed potential co-conspirators. According to the reporting, Kellen also gave investigators names of additional people allegedly connected to Epstein's abuse network, which lawmakers described as a potentially important lead. But her testimony also creates a central tension for investigators and the public: whether Kellen's claims of victimization explain her conduct, or whether they collide with years of allegations that she helped keep Epstein's machinery running. Either way, her appearance before Congress puts one of Epstein's most scrutinized former insiders back at the center of the investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Here is who Epstein's longtime assistant accused of sexual abuse | CNN Politics

This is a Bureau of Prisons psychological reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York, prepared after his August 10, 2019 death. It lays out Epstein's background, legal history, institutional history, medical and mental-health contacts, and the circumstances leading up to his death. The reconstruction notes that its own review was badly limited from the start: formal interviews were not conducted at DOJ direction, and the original video had been confiscated by the FBI before the reconstruction began, meaning investigators could not fully verify timelines, test witness accounts, or compare competing versions of what happened. It also walks through Epstein's July 2019 arrest, his placement in SHU, the July 23 incident where he was found with material around his neck, his brief placement on suicide watch, his removal to psychological observation, the warning paperwork from the Marshals Service referencing suicidal tendencies, his repeated complaints about sleep and noise, and the major stressors piling up before his death, including bail denial, pending sex-trafficking charges, public disgrace, and the August 9 unsealing of roughly 2,000 pages of damaging material.The most important part is how many so called "institutional failures" the reconstruction identifies. Epstein was supposed to have an appropriate cellmate after coming off observation, but on the night he died he was left alone because his cellmate did not return from court, even though staff knew that hours earlier. The document says the required 30-minute rounds were documented as completed, but Tova Noel and Michael Thomas later stated they did not complete proper rounds at 3:00 a.m. or 5:00 a.m. The reconstruction also flags incomplete and inaccurate paperwork, missing signatures, inconsistent suicide-watch records, unexplained phone calls, failures to maintain direct observation, confusion in housing records, unsecured attorney log books, and a lack of psychological input in cellmate decisions. Its bottom line is not just that Epstein had suicide risk factors; it is that MCC New York's systems for monitoring, documenting, communicating, and managing those risks were chaotic, inconsistent, and in several key places flatly unreliable.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00105651.pdf

The Department of Justice's release of the Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts is nothing but theater—a sham staged to protect the powerful and slam the door shut on the Epstein saga. Maxwell, a convicted trafficker, was granted immunity and a microphone to mock survivors, erase the notion of a client list, and cast doubt on Epstein's death, all while the DOJ used her denials as a shield. The scandal isn't that these transcripts were released—it's that the interview happened at all, that the government legitimized a predator's voice and tried to use it as “closure” for the most explosive trafficking scandal of our time.But this isn't closure—it's desperation. They want the public exhausted, numb, and willing to accept Maxwell's lies as the final word. Yet those who've been in the trenches since the beginning know better. This doesn't end because she says it ends. Every denial and every carefully managed release only proves the cover-up is alive, the names are still hidden, and the truth is still too dangerous to reveal. The DOJ can trot out Maxwell as their mouthpiece, but it won't work—this fight isn't over, and when the reckoning comes, it won't be Maxwell or the elites doing the laughing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Where are your biggest campaign donors going to come from? If you're like most nonprofit leaders, the answer feels like "somewhere out there" — a major philanthropist who just needs to hear your story.In this episode of All About Capital Campaigns, Amy Eisenstein and Andrea Kihlstedt are here to challenge that assumption — and bust the three most common donor myths that derail capital campaigns before they even get started.In this episode, you'll learn:Why your low-level annual donors may have far more major gift capacity than you realizeThe real reason most nonprofits haven't unlocked big gifts from their existing base (hint: it's not the donors)Why Mackenzie Scott, Oprah, and Bill Gates are not your campaign strategy — and what isThe truth about what campaign consultants actually do (and what they absolutely don't)How one couple made one of the campaign's largest gifts after years of $50 donations — and why the organization almost missed themThis is a must-share episode for board members, executive directors, and leadership teams who are still waiting for a magical major donor to show up.Ready to find out where your campaign really stands? Start with our free Campaign Readiness Assessment at capitalcampaignpro.com/assess

The whole alien “disclosure” push reeks like a giant shiny-object maneuver: when the Epstein files are still the unresolved scandal sitting in the middle of the room, suddenly the public is being invited to look up at the sky instead of down at the paper trail. The government can roll out UFO files, talk about “unprecedented transparency,” and tease the possibility of hidden knowledge, but that only makes the contrast sharper: if transparency is the principle, then why does the Epstein record remain so tangled in redactions, delays, survivor-privacy arguments stretched beyond their proper purpose, and bureaucratic fog? The satire works because the alien angle feels absurd on its face, but the underlying point is dead serious: the public is being handed spectacle while the most politically radioactive documents on Earth remain the thing nobody in power wants to fully confront.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Police investigating Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor are reportedly seeking the Metropolitan Police files connected to Virginia Giuffre as part of a widening inquiry into alleged sexual misconduct, fraud, corruption, and misconduct in public office. The focus is not only on Giuffre's long-standing allegations that Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17 after she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell — claims Andrew has denied — but also on what British authorities knew, what they previously reviewed, and whether earlier decisions by the Met left key material untouched. Giuffre gave a statement to the Met in 2015, later sued Andrew in the United States, and reached a multimillion-pound civil settlement with him in 2022 without any admission of liability. Now, after her death in 2025, investigators are reportedly looking back at those files to determine whether there is evidence that should feed into the current probe.The investigation also appears to be examining Andrew's wider conduct around Epstein, including claims that he used or attempted to use official channels, taxpayer-funded protection officers, or confidential information to protect himself or discredit Giuffre. One major thread involves allegations that Andrew passed Giuffre's personal information to a police protection officer in 2011 while trying to dig up damaging material on her shortly before the infamous photograph of Andrew, Giuffre, and Maxwell became public. The Met previously said it found no basis for further action on that issue, but Thames Valley Police are now reportedly reviewing the broader record, including past police handling, Andrew's former royal protection detail, and evidence emerging from Epstein-related document releases. The significance is obvious: this is no longer just about Andrew's old denials or the civil settlement — it is about whether British law enforcement failed to fully confront the Epstein connection when it mattered most.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Police probing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor over 'sex offences' will 'seek late accuser Virginia Giuffre's files' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. House Oversight Committee requested testimony from several high-profile figures — including Bill Gates, Kathryn Ruemmler, and Leon Black — as part of its expanding investigation into connections surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Committee Chairman James Comer sent letters asking seven individuals to appear before the panel, stating that the committee believes they may possess information relevant to its probe. Lawmakers are examining how Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell built influence among powerful figures, as well as whether federal authorities mishandled aspects of the investigation into the pair's alleged sex-trafficking operation. The requests came as Congress continues reviewing large batches of documents released by the Justice Department following legislation requiring disclosure of Epstein-related files.The documents and testimony requests highlight various previously reported interactions between Epstein and prominent figures. Gates has acknowledged meeting Epstein multiple times between 2011 and 2014 and said he is willing to testify, while maintaining he never witnessed or participated in any illegal activity. Ruemmler, who served as White House counsel under Barack Obama, appeared in emails within the released files and has also indicated she will cooperate with the committee's inquiry. Black, who previously paid Epstein large sums for tax and estate planning advice, is likewise expected to answer questions about his relationship with the financier. None of the individuals asked to testify have been charged with crimes related to Epstein, but lawmakers say their testimony could help clarify how Epstein cultivated relationships with influential people and how those connections may have intersected with the broader investigationto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bill Gates among 7 asked to testify before House committee on possible Epstein ties - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This FBI FD-302 memorializes a December 4, 2019 proffer interview with a heavily redacted woman who described both financial and sexual dimensions of her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. She told investigators that in late 2018, after financial stress connected to apartment renovations and after public reporting on Epstein had already intensified, she met Epstein at his New York residence and explained her financial situation. Epstein allegedly called his accountant Richard Kahn during the meeting and arranged for $250,000 to be wired to her, telling her not to tell anyone about the money. She also described receiving another large payment from Epstein, bringing the total to $350,000 between 2013 and 2018. The document also places Lesley Groff in the chain of contact, with the woman saying Groff told her to come meet Epstein if she was in New York. The woman said she did not initially connect the money to press scrutiny or the Miami Herald reporting, portraying Epstein's payment as part of his broader pattern of financial control and “generosity,” though the timing is obviously significant.The most disturbing portion of the interview centers on the woman's description of Epstein's sexual control, coercion, and abuse across multiple locations, including Palm Beach, New York, Paris, New Mexico, and his island. She said Epstein directed her sexually, woke her by touching her, summoned her to sleep in his bed, dictated how she should touch him, controlled aspects of her appearance, and made her feel she had no meaningful choice. She described one Palm Beach gym encounter as an aggressive rape, saying Epstein turned the music up, closed the hurricane shutters, pulled down her pants, and had intercourse with her. She also placed Ghislaine Maxwell directly inside the sexual machinery, saying Maxwell was present during an early encounter, touched her, instructed her where and how to touch Epstein, made sexually explicit comments, and helped normalize Epstein's demands. The interview also describes Maxwell's broader household authority: approving bills, running Epstein's homes, overseeing staff and logistics, and creating an environment where the woman felt isolated, ashamed, dependent, and unable to tell anyone because her friends, work, lawyers, housing, and relationships were all tied back to Epstein's world.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA01246595.pdf

Jump in with Carlos Juico and Gavin Ruta on episode 288 of Jumpers Jump. This episode we discuss: Drake iceman album theories, Billboard froze with Drake's songs, Drake 3 album theory, Drake Michael Jackson record label problems, Drake's UMG deal, Iceman album cover theory, Drake lyrics with double meanings, Drake dissing Kendrick on album, Bill gates mosquitos theory, American food vs EU food, Disney cruise rabbit hole, Hantavirus cruise theory, Ticks make you allergic to meat, Obsession movie theories, One wish willow, Obsession alarm clock hidden detail, D4VD confession on stream, Fey spirit urban legend, Danger of love spells, Nba is rigged theory, Dylan harper not allowed back into the game, NFL script found, Ronda rousey fixed fight, Chess is a rigged sport, Japanese sidewalk invention, Eating while walking on the streets of Japan, Panda's don't exist, Cruise ships death theory, Sharks eyes theory, Tiktok detectives, Talking positive thoughts to everything, healing dementia and much more! Follow the podcast: @JumpersPodcast Follow Carlos: @CarlosJuico Follow Gavin: @GavinRutaa Check out the podcast on YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/JumpersJumpYT Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

As word of a tick-borne illness making hundreds of thousands of Americans sick and allergic to meat spreads across the heartland, we have to ask: Are we nothing but lab rats for the geoengineering of viruses? Bill Gates is a monster investor in fake meat and all of a sudden, cattle ranchers are becoming infected and are now allergic to the very product Gates wants us to stop eating? PLEASE. Buckle up because this hour is going to get fussy.  

Climate change fanatics call Dr. Willie Soon a “contrarian”… when they're being kind. The renowned astrophysicist and geoscientist, once employed at the Smithsonian, controversially asserts that the climate is solar-driven, the carbon dioxide narrative is wildly overstated, and our real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy—not pretending we can regulate the sun. Dr. Willie Soon breaks down why carbon dioxide is plant food rather than a pollutant, why the UN climate committee is suddenly backtracking on its most extreme doomsday warming scenarios, and the blatant hypocrisy of Bill Gates walking back climate doomerism to protect his energy-guzzling AI data centers. Attorney Viva Frei discusses why he is growing increasingly “black-pilled” and breaks down the massive grassroots fury surrounding Rep. Thomas Massie's shocking primary defeat after Donald Trump endorsed his opponent. Beloved comedian Brad Williams brings some much-needed laughter and discusses his highly anticipated comedy special ‘Live on Short Street,' headlining Cirque du Soleil's ‘Mad Apple' in Las Vegas. David Freiheit, known as Viva Frei, is an attorney and political commentator. He hosts the Viva Frei Show on Rumble and Locals and cohosts Viva & Barnes Live with attorney Robert Barnes, focusing on constitutional law, civil liberties, and current events. Follow at https://x.com/TheVivaFrei Dr. Willie Soon (Wei-Hock “Willie” Soon) is an astrophysicist and geoscientist and joint team leader at Ceres Science. He appeared on Tucker Carlson's show to address the climate change narrative and has been targeted by Media Matters. Learn more at https://www.ceres-science.com Brad Williams is a comedian and actor. He made history as the first stand-up comedian to headline a Cirque du Soleil production, leading Mad Apple in Las Vegas. His special Live on Short Street premiered on YouTube, and he appeared in Spinal Tap II: The End Continues. Follow at https://x.com/funnybrad 「 SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS 」 ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• FATTY15 – The future of essential fatty acids is here! Strengthen your cells against age-related breakdown with Fatty15. Get 15% off a 90-day Starter Kit Subscription at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://drdrew.com/fatty15⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • PALEOVALLEY - "Paleovalley has a wide variety of extraordinary products that are both healthful and delicious,” says Dr. Drew. "I am a huge fan of this brand and know you'll love it too!” Get 15% off your first order at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://drdrew.com/paleovalley⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • THE WELLNESS COMPANY - Counteract harmful spike proteins with TWC's Signature Series Spike Support Formula containing nattokinase and selenium. Learn more about TWC's supplements at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twc.health/drew⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 「 ABOUT THE SHOW 」 This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Executive Producers • Kaleb Nation - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://kalebnation.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • Susan Pinsky - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/firstladyoflove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Content Producer • Emily Barsh - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/emilytvproducer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Hosted By • Dr. Drew Pinsky - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/drdrew⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

New Mexico's Epstein Truth Commission is set to hold its first public meeting on June 1 as it begins investigating allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch, the sprawling New Mexico property that has remained one of the most under-examined parts of the Epstein story. The bipartisan commission includes four lawmakers and a legal team with subpoena power, and its mandate is to determine whether criminal activity at the ranch went unchecked and whether local or state officials properly investigated prior allegations. The renewed inquiry follows the halted 2019 state investigation and comes as members of the public, shelters, law enforcement sources, and others have reportedly begun coming forward with information about what may have happened in New Mexico.The commission is also expected to examine whether officials were influenced by money, campaign contributions, political access, or other pressure to look away from Epstein's activities. One major focus is whether New Mexico's laws at the time created an environment that benefited Epstein: the state lacked a human trafficking law, and Epstein was not required to register there as a sex offender. The investigation could potentially lead to charges if wrongdoing is uncovered, but just as importantly, it represents a long-overdue effort to scrutinize Zorro Ranch as more than a footnote. For years, the ranch has sat at the center of allegations involving abuse, secrecy, powerful visitors, and institutional failure; now, New Mexico is finally creating a formal public process to ask who knew what, who failed to act, and whether survivors were denied justice on state soil.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Epstein Truth Commission holding first public meeting June 1

Social media is exploding with claims about ticks, meat allergies, Bill Gates, and even allegations that insects are being spread intentionally. While some of the viral stories stretch far beyond the evidence, the rise in Alpha-Gal syndrome and tick-borne illnesses is very real — and it has many people asking questions about health, fear, and the times we are living in.  But while fear and confusion spread online, something very different is happening across America: revival is breaking out. From unusual headlines to powerful moves of God, this episode explores the contrast between a world gripped by panic and a Church being called back to faith, truth, and the power of the Gospel. 👉 Subscribe for daily prophecy updates and biblical analysis of current events👉 Learn more at https://watch.osn.tv/browse ⭐️: True Gold Republic: Get The Endtime Show special on precious metals at https://www.endtimegold.com 📱: It's never been easier to understand. Stream Only Source Network and access exclusive content: https://watch.osn.tv/browse 📚: Check out Jerusalem Prophecy College Online for less than $60 per course: https://jerusalemprophecycollege.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices