Podcasts about Jeffrey Epstein

In episode 1979, Jack and guest co-host Blake Wexler are joined by comedian and host of Pod Yourself A Gun and Bad Hasbara, Matt Lieb, to discuss… Time Magazine’s 2025 Person Of The Year Is… The “Architects Of AI”, Tim Pool Is Circling The Drain, Eyes Wide Shut Is The Weirdest Christmas Movie To Watch In 2025 and more! Time Magazine Skewered Over ‘Person of the Year’ Reveal Time Magazine’s 2025 Person Of The Year Is… The “Architects Of AI” Time picked a rough day to announce its ‘Person of the Year’ Behind the Photo: Lunch Atop a Skyscraper The Story Behind ‘Lunch Atop A Skyscraper,’ The Photo That Inspired Great Depression-Era America MAGA Star Refuses to Give Cops Footage of Alleged Shooting Eyes Wide Shut is the ultimate Christmas film ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ DP Larry Smith on the New Criterion Transfer, Filming the Orgy, and Nicole Kidman’s Commitment to More Takes How Stanley Kubrick’s ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ Predicted the Jeffrey Epstein Saga Roger Avary: Warner Bros Changed Kubrick's Original Ending of ‘Eyes Wide Shut' Gen Z are obsessed with Eyes Wide Shut – and it’s got a lot to do with Jeffrey Epstein Establishing the connection between Eyes Wide Shut and Epstein/Weinstein (REDDIT) Larry Celona Jeffrey Epstein timeline: How the Palm Beach County case led to 15 more years of sex abuse Steve Martin Discusses Being Pitched ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ By Stanley Kubrick Kubrick Dreamed of Casting Bill Murray, Woody Allen for ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ Before Tom Cruise Cinema: All Eyes On Them Scholars Discover Alternate Ending to Schnitzler's Dream Story Research Was Key When It Came To Creating Eyes Wide Shut's Most Famous Scene Matt Lieb's Piece of Media LISTEN: Follow the Light by Dirty Loops, Cory WongSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rich people are not like us–they have more money. And mega-rich people? They not only have more money, but they hide it “offshore,” to avoid detection by the tax man, law enforcement, creditors, divorce lawyers, and, sometimes, their fellow citizens whose collective coffers they've plundered.In this conversation, Greg Olear speaks with the economic sociology professor Brooke Harrington, author of Offshore: Stealth Wealth and the New Colonialism, about the murky world of offshore finance, its implications for global inequality, the challenges of studying the ultra-rich, the culture of competitive depravity among the wealthy, and the dangers of their influence on both democracy and capitalism. They also discuss the looming AI bubble, the true purpose of AI, Jeffrey Epstein, and why studying the humanities is so vital.Brooke Harrington is Professor of Economic Sociology at Dartmouth College. Since 2007, she has examined inequality from the top end of the socio-economic spectrum—a research program inaugurated by her training for two years to become a certified offshore wealth manager. Her previous book—Capital without Borders —won the “Outstanding Book” award from the Inequality, Poverty and Mobility section of the American Sociological Association. She advises the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, EU Parliament, and the tax agencies of countries across Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. Her latest book, Offshore: Stealth Wealth and the New Colonialism, was named a “Best Book” of 2024 by the Financial Times.Follow Brooke:https://bsky.app/profile/ebharrington.bsky.socialVisit her website:https://brookeharrington.com/Buy the book:https://brookeharrington.com/books/offshore-book/Please subscribe to PREVAIL on Substack. There's six full years' worth of work in the archives on Trump, Russia, Jeffrey Epstein, Leonard Leo, and much more. Every piece at PREVAIL is free to read and always will be. No paywalls, ever. Your generous support keeps it that way. Subscriptions are just $6.99 a month, $65 a year. Visit gregolear.substack.com to learn more. Make America Great Gatsby Again!https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-great-gatsby-four-sticks-press-centennial-edition/e701221776c88f86?ean=9798985931976&next=tSubscribe to The Five 8:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0BRnRwe7yDZXIaF-QZfvhACheck out ROUGH BEAST, Greg's new book:https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D47CMX17ROUGH BEAST is now available as an audiobook:https://www.audible.com/pd/Rough-Beast-Audiobook/B0D8K41S3T Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Indiana Republicans say no to Trump's major redistricting push. Plus, she communicated with Jeffrey Epstein more than almost anyone else in the trove of documents released by the White House. Who is she and why was she so close to Epstein?  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Donald Trump's prosecutors tried and failed a third time to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has repeatedly humiliated Donald Trump by exposing fraud in his organizations. Abbe Lowell, attorney for James, talks with Jen Psaki about the egregiousness of the politically motivated case, and the possibility of a counter suit over the DOJ's abuse of power.Rep. Hakeem Jeffries talks with Jen about the upcoming midterms, Donald Trump's unpopularity, and Indiana Republicans rejecting Trump's push to boost the number of Republican districts to help him preserve power in Congress.Senator Rev. Raphael Warnock talks with Jen Psaki about the looming health care crisis if Republicans continue to be unable to produce a solution to extent Obamacare subsidies, and the factors that are contributing to the housing crisis in the U.S. that Republicans in charge of Congress are also unable to address.Senator Adam Schiff discusses the upcoming release of Epstein investigation documents.   To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In a recent letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Draft Combs 23.1 Letter 110124 [trg]

Jim and Kathy discuss the latest details of the emerging list of associates of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And they opine on how and why Epstein was able to continue his sexual abuse of minors and sex trafficking decades after being caught in 2005. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Reports indicate that Sean "Diddy" Combs allegedly spent approximately $500,000 on a "Freak Off" party in the early 2000s, which included redecorating a room in his mansion with hundreds of mirrors on the walls and ceiling to enhance the viewing experience of the event. These gatherings were characterized by extravagant expenditures on high-end food, expensive alcohol, dancers, acrobats, and sometimes live animals, contributing to the overall cost. The parties reportedly featured explicit activities, with the mirrored room designed to reflect the events occurring within.In our second segment...In November 2024, DeWitt Gilmore filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and his bodyguards, alleging that they physically assaulted him outside a New York City nightclub in the summer of 1996. According to Gilmore, after exiting the club, Combs and his entourage confronted him, leading to a verbal altercation that escalated when armed members of Combs' group blocked his car and fired shots. Gilmore claims he and his friends narrowly escaped the scene by accelerating through traffic. Combs' representatives have dismissed the allegations as "pure fiction," expressing confidence that the judicial process will reveal the truth.(commercial at 9:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Exclusive | Diddy redecorated room with hundreds of mirrors for $500K 'Freak Off'source:Diddy sued by man for 1996 physical assault outside club

Reid Hoffman's explanation for why he went to Jeffrey Epstein's island rests almost entirely on a familiar Silicon Valley dodge: curiosity paired with selective amnesia. Hoffman has said he viewed Epstein as a wealthy, well-connected financier who positioned himself as a bridge between tech, academia, and philanthropy, and that his presence was motivated by meetings and conversations, not indulgence. The problem with that reasoning is timing and context. Epstein's criminal record was already public, his reputation already radioactive to anyone pretending to exercise basic judgment, and the island itself was not some vague conference space but a location already shrouded in rumor, reporting, and legal concern. Hoffman's framing asks the public to believe that a man renowned for pattern recognition, risk assessment, and strategic thinking somehow failed to register the reputational and ethical alarms that would have been blaring to anyone paying even minimal attention.What makes the explanation harder to swallow is how carefully Hoffman draws the line between “association” and “involvement,” as if physical presence is somehow abstract. He doesn't claim ignorance of Epstein the man so much as ignorance of Epstein the monster, a distinction that collapses under scrutiny given what was already known at the time. This reasoning leans heavily on plausibility rather than credibility, relying on the assumption that intelligence and success excuse naïveté. At its core, Hoffman's justification feels less like an honest accounting and more like reputational damage control: minimizing proximity, reframing intent, and hoping the conversation never moves beyond surface explanations. Skepticism isn't cynicism here—it's the natural response when a powerful figure insists they walked into a very public moral minefield and somehow never noticed the warning signs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: Reid Hoffman Describes Visit to Epstein's Island - Business Insider

Prince Andrew's presence at the christening of his granddaughter has become a quiet but loaded news moment, highlighting how thoroughly his scandal continues to shadow even the most private royal occasions. Reports indicate that Andrew attended—or was expected to attend—the christening in a strictly personal, family-only capacity, deliberately stripped of any public or ceremonial role. There were no official photographs, no balcony moments, and no formal acknowledgment of his presence, underscoring the royal family's ongoing effort to keep him firmly at the margins while avoiding the optics of outright exclusion from close family milestones.The broader significance lies not in the ceremony itself, but in what it represents: Andrew's continuing limbo within the royal ecosystem. While technically still family, his attendance was carefully managed to ensure it did not distract from the celebration or trigger public backlash. The christening served as another reminder that Andrew's Epstein-linked disgrace remains unresolved in the public mind, casting a long, uncomfortable shadow over moments that would otherwise be purely joyful—proof that, for him, even silence and invisibility cannot fully erase the stain.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew and Fergie to come out of exile for granddaughter's palace christening... but royal insiders say other guests dread seeing ex-Duke | Daily Mail Online

The emerging picture from newly disclosed emails makes one thing brutally clear: Wall Street didn't just “miss the signs” with Jeffrey Epstein, it consciously stepped over them. By the time many of the major banks and financial institutions continued doing business with him, Epstein's reputation was already radioactive in elite circles. His 2008 conviction, his widely whispered-about abuse allegations, and his bizarre financial setup were not secrets. Yet he retained accounts, access, and financial services because he was useful, connected, and wealthy enough to be tolerated. Compliance red flags that would sink an ordinary client were ignored, rationalized, or buried when Epstein showed up with political connections, billionaire friends, and streams of money flowing through complex structures designed to obscure scrutiny.The newly surfaced emails function like a roadmap of receipts, documenting how Epstein actively leveraged this tolerance and how institutions responded. They show bankers, lawyers, and intermediaries discussing transfers, accounts, and logistics with a level of familiarity that makes the “we had no idea” defense laughable. These communications capture the normalization of Epstein inside the financial system—how questions were softened, concerns were deferred, and accountability was treated as optional. Together, they reinforce what critics have long argued: Epstein wasn't enabled by one rogue banker or one careless department, but by a financial culture that valued access and profit over basic moral and legal responsibility, and now the paper trail is finally catching up to that reality.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein's Wealth and Power Fueled by Wall Street Connections, Emails Reveal

Judge  Berman's decision to unseal the Epstein grand jury documents represents one of the most forceful judicial pushes for transparency in a case that has been defined by secrecy, institutional hesitancy, and years of bureaucratic dodgeball. In his ruling, Berman made clear that the new federal Epstein transparency law leaves no ambiguity: Congress intended these records to be opened, and the courts are obligated to follow that mandate. He dismissed the government's familiar attempts to stall—claims of “ongoing investigations,” potential harm, or procedural barriers—pointing out that federal authorities had ample time to act and repeatedly failed. His message carried an unmistakable edge: protecting the system's reputation is not a valid reason to keep the public in the dark.At the same time, Berman cautioned against expecting some blockbuster revelation hidden inside the files. He suggested that the documents will likely confirm what is already obvious—that Epstein benefited from prosecutorial deference, behind-the-scenes dealmaking, and a pattern of decisions that favored a wealthy predator over vulnerable victims. Still, his ruling is a major break from the institutional instinct to bury mistakes. By ordering the documents unsealed, Berman signaled that the era of reflexive secrecy around Epstein is collapsing, and that the public finally has a right to inspect how a serial offender was allowed to operate with impunity for so long.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DOJ cleared to release files from Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 sex trafficking trial | Fox News

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's chief of staff calls accusations against her "disturbing and unthinkable"

John Morgan talks candidly about Epstein, blackmail, Ghislaine Maxwell, and why powerful people feared him. He breaks down myths about Clinton, Trump, and the money trail while adding wild facts you've never heard. A shocking and hilarious segment with PBD.

On this episode, Chris Hansen has a seat with Child USA Founder and CEO, Professor Marci Hamilton, a leading expert on clergy sex abuse and child sex abuse statutes of limitation. As author of Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children, Hamilton is at the forefront of crimes against children reform in the United States. Hansen and Hamilton dive into the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases, what the public can hope to learn when the full files are released and how we must put victims first, no matter how much time as passed when crimes against them were committed. Home Title Lock: Go to https://hometitlelock.com/chrishansen and use promo code HANSEN to get a FREE title history report and a FREE TRIAL of their Triple Lock Protection! For details visit https://hometitlelock.com/warranty ExpressVPN: Go to https://expressvpn.com/CHRISHANSEN and find out how you can get up to 4 extra months thanks to our sponsor, ExpressVPN! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Federal Reserve is set to cut interest rates to shore up a shaky job market. Another federal judge has just ruled on releasing records relating to Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 sex trafficking case. There are more instances of US strikes on alleged drug boats that have initially left survivors. A pro-AI super PAC is launching its first candidate ads. Plus, why this year's Nobel Peace Prize winner wasn't there to collect the award. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Howie Kurtz on President Trump's recent rally despite media criticism of his health, the release of records related to the Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein investigation, and Netflix's $72 billion bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.  Follow Howie on Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@HowardKurtz⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠For more #MediaBuzz click here Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn were not peripheral figures in Jeffrey Epstein's world but central operators who helped build, maintain, and financially sustain his criminal enterprise. As Epstein's longtime lawyer and accountant, they created and managed the complex web of trusts, shell companies, bank accounts, and legal entities that allowed money to move discreetly while obscuring its purpose. Lawsuits filed by survivors and the U.S. Virgin Islands government describe them as “indispensable captains” of the enterprise, alleging they facilitated payments to victims and recruiters, structured entities to shield assets, and continued working for Epstein even after his 2008 sex-crime conviction. Though they deny any knowledge of abuse, judges have allowed civil claims against them to proceed, ruling that allegations of aiding and abetting trafficking are legally plausible and worthy of full discovery.After Epstein's death in 2019, Indyke and Kahn were named co-executors of his estate, giving them control over key documents, assets, and settlement negotiations, including a $105 million settlement with the U.S. Virgin Islands. Their continued gatekeeping role, combined with their status as beneficiaries of Epstein-linked trusts, has fueled criticism that the system has protected the very professionals accused of enabling his crimes. Despite being repeatedly named in court filings and investigative reports, they have largely avoided public scrutiny and congressional testimony. Critics argue that the failure to subpoena or question them under oath reflects a broader pattern of performative oversight, where political theater replaces substantive investigation into the financial and legal infrastructure that made Epstein's long-running operation possible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeffrey Epstein weaponized silence by turning it into both a shield and a currency. He used money, legal force, intimidation, and psychological manipulation to ensure that the truth about his crimes stayed buried. Survivors were silenced through a combination of nondisclosure agreements, confidential settlements, and the constant threat of being crushed financially or reputationally if they spoke out. Epstein understood that isolation was power: young victims were made to believe no one would listen, that they would be discredited, or that speaking would only invite pain. Silence wasn't just encouraged—it was engineered, reinforced by lawyers who treated secrecy as a business model and institutions that found it more convenient to look away than to confront what he was doing.Epstein extended this strategy outward, using silence as leverage over powerful people and systems. His connections in politics, finance, academia, and law enforcement created a chilling effect where questions were discouraged and scrutiny was deflected. The 2008 non-prosecution agreement institutionalized that silence, protecting Epstein while gagging victims and shielding co-conspirators from exposure. Media hesitancy, prosecutorial inaction, sealed records, and backroom deals all worked in tandem to maintain the quiet. In the end, Epstein didn't just evade justice through wealth and influence—he constructed a vacuum where truth suffocated, and that silence became the most effective tool in sustaining his criminal enterprise for decades.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein's most powerful ally was silence | Gretchen Carlson and Julie Roginsky | The Guardian

On this episode of the podcast, Amanda Head brings exclusive interviews from her nightly primetime TV news show, “Just The News, No Noise” co-hosted by investigative journalist and Editor-in-Chief of Just The News, John Solomon. The duo's first interview is with House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, who exposes a stunning $1B fraud scandal in Minnesota, outlining how whistleblowers helped uncover a scheme that could implicate Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison. Comer previews where the investigation may expand next and offers updates on his committee's probes into Jeffrey Epstein's finances and possible CIA connections, underscoring the urgent need for transparency inside federal institutions. The second interview of the show is with Texas Attorney General and US Senate Candidate Ken Paxton. They dive into the consequences of the Supreme Court's ruling allowing Texas to proceed with its 2026 congressional maps. Paxton contracts Texas' process with what he calls blatant Democratic gerrymandering in states like California and Illinois, and sharpens his criticism of Senator Cornyn's long tenure, calling out a lack of meaningful accomplishments. You can watch Amanda Head and John Solomon on their weekday primetime TV news show, “Just The News, No Noise” at 6PM ET on the Real America's Voice Network or on JustTheNews.com.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

AlabamaALFA praises President Trump for $12B financial aid to farmers in USSpecial Master bill comes in at $240K for re-mapping two senate districtsSen. Tuberville says AL.com writer predictably calls him racist for opposing radical IslamEli Lilly to build $6B manufacturing facility in HuntsvilleCity of Madison votes to join lawsuit against AL Dept of Revenue over taxThe Hangout Music Festival not coming to Gulf Shores in 2026National2 NJ brother arrested for threats of murder against DHS Tricia McLaughlinGOP in Senate offering bill to to restructure Obamacare subsidiesDC appeals court rules that ban on transgenders in military is appropriateBorder Czar Homan reviewing Somali visas in MN, and particularly congresswoman Ilhan Omar for committing immigration fraudFederal judge rules that docs surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell, accomplice to Jeffrey Epstein, can be released by DOJ

Tonight on The Last Word: Affordable Care Act subsidies are set to expire at the end of the year. Also, The Washington Post reports Donald Trump pardoned dozens of accused of drug-related crimes. Plus, MS NOW reports Kash Patel's girlfriend asked FBI security detail to drive home her allegedly drunk friend after partying. And Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene links Trump to threats against her family. Sen. Jon Ossoff, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, and Rep. Ro Khanna join Lawrence O'Donnell.  To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Patrick Bet-David sits down with billionaire DNC mega donor John Morgan from Morgan and Morgan for a raw, no-filters conversation on his legal battles with Disney, Bill Clinton's ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the Biden administration's cover-up accusations, and his feud with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.------

This clip was from today's session of the Free 5-Day Inner Critic Bootcamp.There is still time to register and catch up! Use this link:Trigger Warning: SA, child abuse. Today's episode delves deep into the control systems set by the elite class, their influence on education, political systems, and economic disparities, and how these shape our inner critic and generational trauma. The session emphasizes the importance of reconciling with our inner child, recognizing the larger system at play, and empowering ourselves to heal and break the cycle of trauma.TIMESTAMPS:00:02 The Inner Critic Bootcamp Overview04:16 The Spider Web Experiment06:12 Generational Trauma and Societal Control09:36 The Elite and Their Influence13:05 The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal15:48 The Empire Who Poisoned Our World For Billions19:41 Corruption in Education21:23 Unveiling the Truth About Robert Maxwell22:33 The Reality of Our World24:02 The Power of Self-Belief25:41 Healing and Inner Strength28:01 Community Support and Personal Stories32:47 The Importance of Inner Child WorkWAS THIS HELPFUL?I'd be so grateful if you could take a moment to follow, leave a 5-star rating, and download a few more episodes. As a gift of gratitude, we'll send you my Inner Child Starter Kit if you leave a 5-star review and share what you love about the show.

We start with a preview of President Donald Trump's speech on the cost of living. The Justice Department's efforts to release the Jeffrey Epstein files took an important step forward. We'll tell you where the Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations now stand. A shooting on a Kentucky campus is under investigation. Plus, an update on the Tufts University student whose visa was revoked after criticizing Israel. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA's protections did not attach until formal federal charges were filed. DOJ lawyers maintained that during the pre-charge negotiation phase, federal prosecutors were operating within their lawful discretion to decline prosecution and enter into a resolution without notifying potential victims. According to this position, because Epstein was never federally charged at the time the agreement was reached, the government contended there were no legally recognized “crime victims” under the CVRA to notify, consult, or confer with during the negotiations.The government further argued that the plea deal itself was a lawful exercise of prosecutorial authority designed to secure accountability through a state-level conviction while conserving federal resources and avoiding litigation risks. DOJ filings emphasized that the CVRA was not intended to regulate prosecutorial decision-making before charges are brought, nor to force prosecutors to disclose or negotiate plea discussions with potential victims in advance. In short, the DOJ's defense rests on a narrow interpretation of when victims' rights legally begin, asserting that while the outcome may have been deeply troubling, it did not constitute a statutory violation under the government's reading of federal law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Title

In the wake of Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody, the Bureau of Prisons promised sweeping reforms aimed at preventing another such failure. Those commitments included stricter adherence to suicide-watch protocols, improved staffing and supervision at facilities like the Metropolitan Correctional Center, greater accountability for guard misconduct, and clearer lines of responsibility when inmates are designated as high-risk. Investigations by the DOJ Inspector General laid out glaring institutional failures, from falsified records to exhausted, improperly trained staff working massive overtime. Publicly, the BOP and the Justice Department framed Epstein's death as a catalyst for overdue reform, assuring lawmakers and the public that meaningful structural changes were underway to restore trust in a system that had catastrophically failed a high-profile detainee.Years later, those promised reforms remain largely unrealized. Chronic understaffing persists across the federal prison system, with suicide prevention protocols still inconsistently applied and accountability for leadership failures remaining minimal. High-level officials largely avoided serious consequences, while the same institutional culture that allowed Epstein's detention to be mishandled continues to define the BOP's operations. Congressional oversight has produced reports and hearings, but little in the way of durable reform, leaving the system vulnerable to the same breakdowns exposed in 2019. The result is a grim reality: Epstein's death became less a turning point for reform than a case study in how federal institutions absorb scandal, issue promises, and then quietly revert to business as usual.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA's protections did not attach until formal federal charges were filed. DOJ lawyers maintained that during the pre-charge negotiation phase, federal prosecutors were operating within their lawful discretion to decline prosecution and enter into a resolution without notifying potential victims. According to this position, because Epstein was never federally charged at the time the agreement was reached, the government contended there were no legally recognized “crime victims” under the CVRA to notify, consult, or confer with during the negotiations.The government further argued that the plea deal itself was a lawful exercise of prosecutorial authority designed to secure accountability through a state-level conviction while conserving federal resources and avoiding litigation risks. DOJ filings emphasized that the CVRA was not intended to regulate prosecutorial decision-making before charges are brought, nor to force prosecutors to disclose or negotiate plea discussions with potential victims in advance. In short, the DOJ's defense rests on a narrow interpretation of when victims' rights legally begin, asserting that while the outcome may have been deeply troubling, it did not constitute a statutory violation under the government's reading of federal law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Title

The Department of Justice has consistently argued that the controversial 2007–2008 Epstein non-prosecution agreement did not violate the Crime Victims' Rights Act because, in its view, the CVRA's protections did not attach until formal federal charges were filed. DOJ lawyers maintained that during the pre-charge negotiation phase, federal prosecutors were operating within their lawful discretion to decline prosecution and enter into a resolution without notifying potential victims. According to this position, because Epstein was never federally charged at the time the agreement was reached, the government contended there were no legally recognized “crime victims” under the CVRA to notify, consult, or confer with during the negotiations.The government further argued that the plea deal itself was a lawful exercise of prosecutorial authority designed to secure accountability through a state-level conviction while conserving federal resources and avoiding litigation risks. DOJ filings emphasized that the CVRA was not intended to regulate prosecutorial decision-making before charges are brought, nor to force prosecutors to disclose or negotiate plea discussions with potential victims in advance. In short, the DOJ's defense rests on a narrow interpretation of when victims' rights legally begin, asserting that while the outcome may have been deeply troubling, it did not constitute a statutory violation under the government's reading of federal law.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Title

Turn online alignment into an offline community — join us at TheWayFwrd.com to connect with like-minded people near you.What if the real danger isn't left vs. right, but the illusion that either one is fighting for you?I sat down again with Derrick Broze, investigative journalist, author, documentary filmmaker, public speaker, and Voluntaryist activist, to talk about why Trump's second term is unfolding exactly as we predicted a year ago, and why so many people who claim to value freedom are doubling down on the state anyway. Derrick has spent years building intentional communities in Mexico, organizing solution-focused events, and reporting on technocracy, surveillance, and the deeper currents shaping the so-called freedom movement.Tune into this episode to hear the breakdown of the patterns playing out right now—from ICE raids and digital ID rollout to the influencer economy that keeps people reactive instead of sovereign. The question isn't whether you saw it coming or not… it's whether you're ready to build something else.You'll Learn:[00:00:00] Introduction[00:14:37] What's actually happening with ICE raids and why American citizens are getting detained[00:16:53] How the immigration issue is being used to normalize facial recognition and digital IDs[00:23:55] What's really happening off the coast of Venezuela right now[00:32:10] Why mainstream media walking out of the Pentagon matters more than you think[00:40:02] The Jeffrey Epstein narrative was steered using Influencers[00:46:34] How Trump extended Biden's appeal to keep fluoride in the water despite MAHA promises[01:03:44] Peter Thiel network's influence throughout the Trump administration[01:10:48] The connections between Steve Bannon's philosophy and Trump's current strategy[01:12:20] What Derrick discovered interviewing No Kings protesters about their COVID-era positions[01:23:45] An alternative vision to Agenda 2030[01:40:12] The foundational principles of the conscious Agora Eco Village[01:43:19] Refining 500 people interested in building a community in Mexico to the ones that aligned with their values and vision[01:46:49] Don't make this mistake when building a conscious community[01:55:43] Questions to ask before joining a community to prevent conflict[02:14:31] How the People's Reset integrates Mexican locals instead of creating another expat bubble[02:23:08] The intergenerational trauma pattern that sent three generations to prison[02:24:43] What really happened when Derrick turned 21 in a Texas prison[02:51:50] Clearing the air on the no-virus debate and why nuance got lost in tribalism[03:01:13] Why Derrick won't make every topic his focus despite online pressureResources Mentioned:The Way Forward episode on Don't Vote? So What's Your Solution? featuring Derrick Broze | YouTubeBringing Down Jeffrey Epstein by Derrick Broze | DocumentaryThe 5G Trojan Horse by Derrick Broze | DocumentaryManifesto of the Free Humans by Derrick Broze and John Vibes | BookHow to Opt-Out of the Technocratic State by Derrick Broze | BookSociopath: A Memoir by Patric Gagne | BookFind more from Derrick:Conscious Resistance | WebsiteThe People's Reset | WebsiteThe Pyramid of Power | WebsiteFind more from Alec:Alec Zeck | InstagramAlec Zeck | XThe Way Forward | InstagramThe Way Forward is Sponsored By:Designed for deep focus and well-being. 100% blue light and flicker free. For $50 off your Daylight Computer, use discount code: TWF50New Biology Clinic: Redefine Health from the Ground UpExperience tailored terrain-based health services with consults, livestreams, movement classes, and more. Visit www.NewBiologyClinic.com and use code TheWayForward for $50 off activation. Members get the $150 fee waived

Dive into this powerful episode of Heretics as Andrew Gold sits down with legendary journalist Roy Greenslade to examine the hidden world behind some of the UK's most controversial media scandals. From the rise and fall of undercover reporter Mazher Mahmood (“the Fake Sheikh”) to the explosive allegations surrounding Prince Andrew and his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, this conversation pulls back the curtain on deception, corruption, and the ethical failures that shaped decades of tabloid journalism. SPONSORS: Use my code Andrew25 on MyHeritage: https://bit.ly/AndrewGoldDNA  Grab your free seat to the 2-Day AI Mastermind: https://link.outskill.com/GOLDNOV4  Start fresh at tryfum.com/products/zero-crisp-mint . Over 500,000 people have already made the switch — no nicotine, no vapor, no batteries. Just flavor, fidget, and a fresh start. Get up to 45% off Ekster with my code ANDREWGOLDHERETICS: https://partner.ekster.com/andrewgoldheretics  Plaud links! Official Website: Uk: https://bit.ly/3K7jDGm US: https://bit.ly/4a0tUie  Amazon: https://amzn.to/4hQVyAm Get an automatic 20% discount at checkout until December 1st. Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at https://mintmobile.com/heretics  Greenslade reflects on the manipulative tactics used in high-profile stings, how the media amplified the Epstein narrative, and the long-term consequences for public trust. Whether you're interested in investigative journalism, media ethics, or the untold stories behind Britain's biggest scandals, this interview offers rare insight from one of the UK's most experienced media critics. Get Roy's book: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1739102215 Watch to the end for a candid exploration of accountability, power, and the real-world impact of sensationalist reporting. #HereticsPodcast #MazherMahmood #PrinceAndrew  Join the 30k heretics on my mailing list: https://andrewgoldheretics.com  Check out my new documentary channel: https://youtube.com/@andrewgoldinvestigates  Andrew on X: https://twitter.com/andrewgold_ok   Insta: https://www.instagram.com/andrewgold_ok Heretics YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@andrewgoldheretics #GenderDebate #TransDiscussion #HereticsPodcast Chapters: 0:00 — The Prince Andrew Bombshell: What No One Dares Say 3:00 — Enter Mazher Mahmood: The Rise of the Fake Sheikh 6:00 — Ruthless Tactics & Media Manipulation Exposed 9:00 — Inside the Tabloid Sting Factory: Secrets Revealed 12:00 — The Epstein Connection: New Angles on Andrew's Scandal 15:00 — The Case That Unravelled Everything 18:00 — Exiled, Hunted, and Dangerous: The Mahmood Backstory 21:00 — Celebrity Victims & Collateral Damage: The Human Toll 24:00 — Unmasking a Predator: Patterns Hidden in Plain Sight 27:00 — Why the Royals Fear the Media Machine 30:00 — Chasing Headlines: The Tabloid War for Scandal 33:00 — Stings, Lies, and Fabrication: The Mahmood Method 36:00 — How the Press Shapes Criminal Narratives 39:00 — Greenslade's Confession: The Dark Side of Journalism 42:00 — When Reporting Becomes Entrapment 45:00 — Behind Palace Doors: The Andrew Fallout 48:00 — Epstein's Shadow Over the Royal Family 51:00 — The Fake Sheikh's Final Undoing 54:00 — Media Corruption at the Highest Level 57:00 — Can the Press Ever Be Trusted Again? 1:00:00 — The Truth That Still Hasn't Come Out Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Even from behind bars, Ghislaine Maxwell has remained a steadfast and vocal defender of Prince Andrew, clinging to a narrative of innocence that defies the mountain of public scrutiny and survivor testimony. In interviews and through intermediaries, Maxwell has repeatedly insisted that the infamous photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre—his arm around her bare waist, Maxwell herself grinning in the background—is either doctored or misrepresented. This denial comes despite the fact that the image has been widely authenticated and corroborated by multiple individuals, including Giuffre. Maxwell's unwavering defense appears less about truth and more about protecting a shared past—one steeped in elite privilege, mutual secrets, and potentially incriminating knowledge. Her loyalty to Andrew reads not as moral conviction, but as a desperate act of preservation for a world that once protected them both.What stands out about Maxwell's continued defense of Prince Andrew is how consistent it has remained, even after her own conviction. Rather than expressing any accountability or reflecting on the damage caused by the trafficking ring she was convicted of helping to run, Maxwell has chosen to double down on denying Andrew's involvement. She's made repeated claims that the photo of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre is fake, despite no credible evidence to support that. Her stance seems rooted less in legal strategy and more in loyalty to past allies. It suggests that, even in prison, Maxwell is still protecting the network of high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, perhaps in the hope that continued silence or allegiance might one day benefit her.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell offers no apology to Epstein victims | Daily Mail Online

Adria Sheri English, a former go-go dancer, has made serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs, claiming that she was forced to participate in sexual activities at his infamous "freak-off" parties. English, who has filed a lawsuit against Diddy, also revealed a list of high-profile celebrities she saw at these gatherings. Among the notable figures she claims were present are Donald Trump, Diana Ross (with her underage son Evan), Paris Hilton, Ja Rule, Busta Rhymes, and Reverend Al Sharpton. English expressed surprise at seeing some of these individuals, particularly Reverend Al Sharpton, at such controversial events.English alleges that while these celebrities attended the main parties, the "freak-offs" took place in secluded rooms away from the main events, suggesting that many of the partygoers may not have been aware of the more sinister activities happening behind closed doors. English also claimed that Diddy secretly recorded these encounters for potential blackmail purposes, further complicating the accusations against him.Courtney Burgess, a witness in the federal investigation against Sean "Diddy" Combs, testified before a grand jury that he possesses 11 flash drives containing sex tapes allegedly involving Combs and eight celebrities, including two to three minors. Burgess claimed these tapes were provided to him by Combs' ex-girlfriend, Kim Porter, before her death in 2018. He described the individuals in the tapes as appearing inebriated and suggested they were victims of Combs' actions..Additionally, Burgess stated that he has seen an unedited version of a memoir written by Porter, which contains detailed accounts of Combs' alleged physical and sexual violence. He mentioned that he was contacted by agents from the Department of Homeland Security and later subpoenaed by a federal grand jury to provide all relevant electronic devices. Burgess's testimony adds to the mounting allegations against Combs, who is currently facing charges including sex trafficking and racketeering.Also...During a recent interagency operation at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, authorities seized drugs, homemade weapons, and electronic devices. The operation, involving the Bureau of Prisons, the Justice Department's inspector general, and other law enforcement agencies, aimed to address safety and security concerns within the facility. Officials stated that the sweep was part of a broader initiative and not in response to any specific threat or individual, including current detainee Sean "Diddy" Combs.The raid calls into question the point of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's death, considering how many of the same issues are still present, even after the BOP was made aware of the issues.  to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The ongoing fight over the Epstein files has exposed a widening fracture inside the MAGA movement, turning what was once a unifying rallying cry about corruption and elite criminality into a loyalty test with shifting rules. Demands for full transparency have collided with political self-preservation, particularly as questions arise that intersect uncomfortably with Donald Trump and his allies. As a result, figures who press too hard for disclosure are increasingly treated as liabilities rather than truth-seekers, revealing how conditional MAGA's commitment to “exposing elites” becomes once it threatens the movement's own power structure.Marjorie Taylor Greene's support for Epstein transparency has highlighted this contradiction. Despite years of near-unquestioned loyalty and ideological signaling, her willingness to break ranks on this issue has been enough to push her outside the movement's evolving “purity” boundary for some supporters. That reaction underscores a broader reality: within today's MAGA ecosystem, ideological conformity and protection of Trump now outweigh previous principles. The Epstein controversy has become a stress test that many in the movement failed, revealing a base more interested in enforcement of loyalty than consistency or accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book is far more than a grotesque artifact—it's a rare glimpse into how the ruling class truly thinks when they believe no one is watching. The notes and jokes scrawled by high-profile figures weren't cautious or sanitized; they were brazen, mocking, and disturbingly casual about Epstein's depravity. These weren't random signatures but names tied to politics, finance, media, and culture—the very people who shape the systems we live under. In their own handwriting, stripped of handlers and stagecraft, they revealed a mindset of entitlement and impunity, a belief that rules are for the powerless, while the elite exist above morality and consequence.The real lesson isn't about Epstein himself, but about the world that enabled him. The book exposes a class that laughs at the darkest crimes, shields one another from accountability, and thrives while the public tears itself apart over endless distractions. We've been set against each other by design, too busy fighting culture wars to notice the true enemy: the predator class whose names fill those pages. The birthday book pulls the curtain back, showing us that the divide isn't left versus right, but them versus us—and unless we recognize that bigger picture, the joke remains on us.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Jeffrey Epstein scandal stands as one of the most glaring failures of the American justice system, a case where victims were silenced, a secret non-prosecution agreement shielded powerful enablers, and federal custody ended in Epstein's death under suspicious negligence. Despite civil settlements, oversight reports, and the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, the story remains fragmented, unresolved, and tainted by mistrust. The Department of Justice is compromised by its own history in the case, and every unanswered question deepens public suspicion. A federally appointed special counsel is the only mechanism capable of cutting through that distrust—armed with subpoena power, independence from political pressure, and the mandate to follow the evidence wherever it leads.That need is only magnified by the President's shocking dismissal of the scandal as a “hoax.” Such rhetoric retraumatizes survivors, emboldens enablers, and corrodes faith in the rule of law. When the highest office mocks the reality of child exploitation, independence becomes not just preferable but mandatory. A special counsel would separate truth from politics, provide finality where there has only been denial, and ensure that victims receive recognition instead of erasure. Without such independence, every decision will remain suspect, every survivor's voice overshadowed, and the system itself further discredited. The choice is stark: let denial bury justice, or appoint a special counsel to prove that no power, no denial, and no president stands above the truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's life makes little sense when viewed through the lens of a rogue financier or even a Mossad agent, but it becomes coherent when understood as the creation of the CIA. From his early placement at the Dalton School by Donald Barr, to his sudden leap into finance at Bear Stearns, to his inexplicable relationship with Leslie Wexner, Epstein's career looks less like chance and more like cultivation. His fortune was smoke and mirrors, likely bolstered by covert funding, and his so-called philanthropy in genetics and AI neatly overlapped with U.S. intelligence interests. His homes wired with cameras, his blackmail operations ensnaring politicians, scientists, and billionaires, and his sweetheart deal in Florida that shielded not just him but his co-conspirators—all of it suggests he was protected because he was too valuable to the intelligence state to lose.While Mossad connections through Ghislaine Maxwell cannot be denied, foreign services couldn't have orchestrated the decades-long media suppression, the unprecedented non-prosecution agreement, or the circumstances of Epstein's death in federal custody. Only U.S. intelligence had the power to build and protect him, then silence him when he became a liability. Epstein was not simply a predator; he was a CIA instrument of blackmail and control, designed to compromise America's own elites and keep them in line. His death was not the end of a scandal—it was the final act of a cleanup operation, ensuring that the files, tapes, and evidence he gathered would never see daylight, and leaving the public with a scapegoat narrative while the machinery of secrecy rolled on.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Reports and lawsuits over the years have alleged that the FBI had detailed knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's activities long before his 2008 conviction and still failed to intervene in any meaningful way. According to these accounts, multiple victims and witnesses claimed they provided information to federal authorities about Epstein's recruitment methods, trafficking network, and the involvement of high-profile associates. Despite this, investigators are accused of slow-walking inquiries, minimizing leads, and ultimately allowing Epstein to operate with impunity for years. The allegations suggest that the bureau possessed far more insight into the scope of his crimes than was ever acted upon, raising serious questions about institutional failures—or worse, deliberate inaction.Critics argue that the FBI's handling of the case reflects a broader pattern in which powerful offenders receive deferential treatment, shielding them from consequences that would be unavoidable for ordinary citizens. The controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement, which shut down a sprawling federal investigation in exchange for a lenient state plea deal, has become central to these allegations, with claims that the bureau either cooperated with or failed to challenge a deal that protected Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators. The result, according to victims' attorneys and watchdog groups, is a portrait of an agency that had the information, had the authority, and still allowed a predator to continue harming minors for years after it should have stopped him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's handling of the now-infamous £750,000 payment came under renewed scrutiny when reports revealed he instructed bankers with questions about the transfer to “call Buckingham Palace.” According to coverage of the incident, when compliance officers at the bank sought clarification about the large sum—sent by Andrew's associate to Sarah Ferguson, and widely viewed as suspicious—Andrew chose not to provide details himself. Instead, he deflected inquiries to the palace, implying that the matter was official or sanctioned at an institutional level. This response immediately raised internal red flags, as banks rely on clear justification for high-value transfers, not royal name-dropping.The request to route all concerns to Buckingham Palace was seen by investigators as an attempt to use royal authority to sidestep standard financial scrutiny. Rather than easing the bank's concerns, Andrew's instruction heightened them, triggering further internal reviews and outside attention. The incident became one more example of how Andrew relied on the aura of royal privilege to manage controversies—an approach that ultimately collapsed once the Epstein scandal and subsequent civil case forced transparency. The £750,000 episode now stands as a pivotal moment showing how Andrew tried, unsuccessfully, to shield questionable financial dealings behind the palace gates.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After Jeffrey Epstein's death, Ghislaine Maxwell moved quickly to secure financial support from his estate, filing claims that she was owed money for years of work and personal protection supposedly carried out on his behalf. She framed herself as someone who had provided valuable services to Epstein—both professionally and personally—and argued that she had been left vulnerable and financially exposed because of her association with him. Her legal team pushed the narrative that Epstein had long promised to take care of her financially, and that his estate was obligated to honor those commitments even after his death.The Epstein estate rejected these claims outright, treating them as an attempt by Maxwell to insulate herself at a moment of extraordinary legal pressure. The effort to obtain funds was widely seen as a strategic move ahead of her criminal charges, intended to bolster her resources for a high-stakes defense. In the end, Maxwell's bid for financial support failed, further isolating her as scrutiny intensified. Her attempt to tap into Epstein's fortune after his death became yet another chapter in the unraveling partnership that had once shielded them both.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bienvenue dans Les fabuleux destins. Aujourd'hui nous allons vous parler d'un homme d'affaires richissime à l'origine d'un horrible trafic sexuel. Proche de nombreux chefs d'États et célébrités américaines et internationales, on le suspecte d'avoir fourni des filles mineures aux quatre coins du globe. Son nom : Jeffrey Epstein. De son ascension fulgurante à sa mort mystérieuse, découvrez son ignoble destin.  Jeffrey Epstein, le magnat de la finance à l'origine d'un horrible trafic sexuel  Jeffrey Epstein naît à Brooklyn en 1953 dans une famille de classe moyenne. Après quelques années d'études à l'université de New York, il se spécialise en physique et en mathématiques. Dès l'âge de 20 ans, il devient professeur, mais le métier ne lui plaît pas. Les perspectives de carrière sont limitées, les horaires contraignants, et puis surtout… le salaire est ridicule à ses yeux. Car Jeffrey rêve de luxe et d'opulence. Il veut faire fortune, et vite ! En 1982, Jeffrey Epstein fonde sa propre entreprise et se voit confier la gestion financière de plus d'un milliard de dollars d'actifs. En à peine quelques années, il s'enrichit considérablement. Il est le symbole de la réussite, du rêve américain, le génie des finances à la personnalité attachante et au physique avantageux. Mais derrière ce masque, il cache un abominable secret qui va le conduire à sa perte... Un podcast Bababam Originals Voix : Andréa Brusque Ecriture : Elie Olivennes Production : Bababam (montage Matteo Benedetto, Antoine Berry Roger) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Judge Rodney Smith's ruling granting the Department of Justice access to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury materials marks a significant shift in how long-protected records related to the case may be handled. Smith found that the recently passed congressional Epstein transparency law overrides the federal rules that typically safeguard grand jury secrecy, effectively opening the door for the unsealing and potential public release of the Florida proceedings. The decision undercuts the DOJ's apparent effort to delay disclosure and signals that courts are willing to recognize congressional intent to prioritize transparency in a case defined by decades of institutional failure.While expectations for major new revelations remain tempered, the release of these records could prove damaging for federal law enforcement by highlighting missed opportunities, prosecutorial caution, and systemic inaction rather than exposing dramatic new evidence. Legal experts note that grand jury materials often reveal more through omissions and tone than explosive disclosures, potentially showing how Epstein was able to operate for years despite widespread awareness of his conduct. The ruling underscores growing pressure on the DOJ and FBI to account not just for Epstein's crimes, but for their own handling of the case, reinforcing broader concerns about unequal justice and the government's reliance on secrecy to shield itself from scrutiny.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Transcripts from Epstein investigation in Florida ordered released | AP News

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in August 2021 against Prince Andrew in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing him of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions when she was a minor trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre alleged that Prince Andrew knowingly participated in Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and abused her in three locations: London, Epstein's Manhattan residence, and Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Central to the suit was her claim that she was coerced into sexual acts under threat and manipulation as part of Epstein's operation, and that Prince Andrew was fully aware of her age and the circumstances.Prince Andrew denied all allegations and initially sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing lack of jurisdiction and pointing to a 2009 settlement Giuffre had reached with Epstein, which his legal team claimed shielded him from liability. The court rejected those arguments, allowing the case to proceed toward discovery and depositions. However, in February 2022, before the case reached trial, Prince Andrew agreed to a settlement with Giuffre. While the settlement included no admission of wrongdoing, it effectively ended the case and marked a major collapse of Andrew's public defenses, triggering severe reputational damage, the loss of his military titles and royal patronages, and his permanent removal from public royal duties.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

An alleged page of Epstein's 50th birthday book is leaked, featuring a drawing of what looks like the outline of a woman's torso. No head, just the curves of a neck, shoulders, no arms and ‘u' shaped drawings for the breasts. Within the outlined silhouette is a badly written poem and it's signed at the very bottom, ‘Donald J. Trump' in thick black ink. His scribbled signature seemingly positioned as the pubic hair of the woman's silhouette.   Trump sues the Wall Street Journal for distributing this alleged letter for $10B and posts on ‘truth social' that it's completely fake. Despite this denial, a clip of Epstein's deposition begins to circulate alongside the poem. Epstein is sitting on a leather armchair, fully leaned to one side, arm propped on the chair, his head resting in his hand. He is asked, “Have you ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump?” Epstein answers, “What do you mean by personal relationship?” “Have you socialized with him?” “Yes sir.” “Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?” Epstein replies, “Though I'd like to answer that question at least today, I'm going to have to assert my 5th, 6th, and 14th amendment right sir.” The 5th Amendment permits someone to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination. The man's name mentioned in Epstein's deposition? The current president of the United States.   How many of the world's most elite and powerful people are connected to serial sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein??   Full show notes available at RottenMangoPodcast.com  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger Picture Trump is now helping the farmers out in California, he is now opening the waters in the north to help the farmers in the south. China is now purchasing soybeans from the US. The US is going to be a manufacturing powerhouse, the US is now building Tiny Cars. Trump is ready to release the liquid gold under our feet. Elon wants the EU abolished which will lead to the destruction of the ECB. The [DS] is trying to stop Trump from moving forward with his plan to take back the country and allow the people to control it. Trump and team released the NSS letting the old guard know that their days are numbered and put the countries on notice that the US is going down a different path and some of the allies we have now might not be our allies. Everything is about to change WW. Economy (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Trump Administration to Direct More Water to California Farms  The Trump administration is making good on a promise to send more water to California farmers in the state’s crop-rich Central Valley. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on Thursday announced a new plan for operating the Central Valley Project, a vast system of pumps, dams, and canals that direct water southward from the state’s wetter north. It follows an executive order President Donald Trump signed in January calling for more water to flow to farmers, arguing the state was wasting the precious resource in the name of protecting endangered fish species. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said the plan will help the federal government “strengthen California’s water resilience.” It takes effect Friday. But California officials and environmental groups blasted the move, saying sending significantly more water to farmlands could threaten water delivery to the rest of the state and would harm salmon and other fish. Most of the state’s water is in the north, but most of its people are in the south. Source: newsmax.com https://twitter.com/SecRollins/status/1997033961210433741?s=20  Trump Set to Sign Off on New Arctic Drilling Surge  Alaska’s Congressional delegation, along with the support of House and Senate Republicans, has scored a major win on the energy front. Representative Nick Begich (AK-At Large) introduced House Joint Resolution 131, stripping Biden-era restrictions on oil and gas exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Rep. Begich’s resolution has passed the House of Representatives and the Senate and is headed to President Trump’s desk for signature. Alaska's congressional delegation on Thursday succeeded in stripping Biden-era protections from the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, moving to expand opportunities for drilling there. The U.S. Senate voted to eliminate the 2024 leasing program for the refuge that put much of the refuge's 1.6-million-acre coastal plain off-limits to potential drilling.  The vote does a lot more than just open the door for potential oil and gas activity.  This is another step in unlocking America’s treasure chest. The areas in question in ANWR are estimated to hold 7.7 billion barrels of oil recoverable with current technology, and the U.S. Geological Survey has estimated that there may be hundreds of millions of barrels in other areas to the west of the ANWR sites. Source: redstate.com https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1997327003062538459?s=20 Political/Rights https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1997007545097961499?s=20 JUST IN: Trump-Appointed Judge Unseals Epstein Grand Jury Records in South Florida  US District Judge Rodney Smith, a Trump appointee, said the law passed by Congress and signed by President Trump overrides grand jury secrecy. The Act applies to unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials that relate to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Consequently, the later-enacted and specific language of the Act trumps Rule 6's prohibition on disclosure. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that United States' Expedited Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts and Modify Protective Order [DE 6] is GRANTED,” the judge wrote. Last month President Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency act into law to release all files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Source: thegatewaypundit.com DOGE https://twitter.com/Patri0tContr0l/status/1997015233399795932?s=20 https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1996997974455357552?s=20 European Union Fines X (Twitter) $140 Million for Violations of Europe's Digital Services Act  The European DSA is ultimately designed to control information, that reality should not be debated. All efforts to control traditional and social media are efforts to control information. The specifics of the reasoning for the fine are typically European.  (1) Twitter allows ordinary people to deliver information at the same level as people who should be defined as more important.  (2)  Advertisers of those who pay for promotion of information on X are not easily identifiable – people need to figure it out on their own.  (3)  It is too difficult to figure out who is providing the information. Basically, all of the EU concerns center around information control.  It's really an ideology issue.  In the outlook of the EU, bureaucrats and elites feel they are superior and must rule/protect the people under them.  Ordinary people having access to information that may or may not be approved by the EU is the underlying issue. Source: theconservativetreehouse.com [SOURCE] What Christopher Landau notes as the contrast and conflict in ideological priority from the EU can just as easily be applied to the USA dynamic with Canada.  As noted by Twitter user John Frank, “The same observations can easily apply to the relations with Canada, given the divergence between the US role in the military alliance with Canada, while Canada is involved in activities which work against US interests.” https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1996925010569511321?s=20 https://twitter.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/1996945925822939407?s=20 https://twitter.com/kadmitriev/status/1997233337354895559?s=20 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1997358453698728063?s=20 Geopolitical War/Peace EU making unacceptable demands on Ukraine peace – Kremlin Western European leaders are constantly making proposals that are unacceptable for Russia, presidential aide Yury Ushakov has said EU leaders are complicating Russia-US efforts to reach a settlement on the Ukraine conflict by making unacceptable demands, Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov has said. European states, however, have reportedly been urging Kiev to reject any deal with Moscow without receiving security guarantees from the US, according to the Wall Street Journal. The EU and UK have also insisted on playing a larger role in the peace process. Source: rt.com Ukraine State Structure in Crisis: Neo-Nazi Junta Starts Unraveling. Clash within its Military-Intelligence (SBU-GUR) Apparatus   Ukrainian state stopped existing in early 2014 at the latest, when it was replaced by a US/NATO-installed regime composed of Nazis, criminals, murderers and their enforcers (it could easily be argued that these are all synonyms and listing them separately might be redundant). This was unequivocally confirmed by the infamous Victoria Nuland, one of the architects of the NATO-orchestrated    Source: theglobalist.com Trump made it a point to when meeting with Zelensky that they don’t have elections in Ukraine because of the war.  How do you get Ukraine to accept a peace deal while the EU, NATO DS is putting on pressure on Zelensky to start WWIII 1. As more corruption is brought out into the open this will put pressure on Zelensky 2. Zelensky will either going along with Trump peace deal or be exposed 3. If Zelensky does not go along, most likely he will be removed because of the corruption 4. This will pave the way for a new candidate, someone who is not controlled by the EU,NATO DS.    NATO EU DS might push a false flag to push the war 5. Trump will be able to work with the president of Ukraine because Putin is ready to go Medical/False Flags https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1997083856315224405?s=20 https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1997073307397423152?s=20   efficacy of this “schedule,” as have I! That is why I have just signed a Presidential Memorandum directing the Department of Health and Human Services to “FAST TRACK” a comprehensive evaluation of Vaccine Schedules from other Countries around the World, and better align the U.S. Vaccine Schedule, so it is finally rooted in the Gold Standard of Science and COMMON SENSE! I am fully confident Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the CDC, will get this done, quickly and correctly, for our Nation's Children. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAHA! https://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1996994177175855445?s=20 [DS] Agenda Grand Jury Says It Won't Indict Letitia James A federal grand jury refused Thursday to reindict New York Attorney General Letitia James. The grand jury rejected Department of Justice's (DOJ) second attempt to bring mortgage-fraud charges just 10 days after a federal judge tossed the original case, according to CNN. Another source told CNN that the decision should not be interpreted as a clean win for James, saying the department could ask a third grand jury to consider the allegations. Source: thegatewaypundit.com FBI Raids Home of High-Ranking DEA Official Under Obama, Charges Him For Conspiring to Launder Millions of Dollars For Mexican Drug Cartel  The FBI on Friday morning raided the home of a high-ranking DEA official under Barack Obama and charged him for conspiring to launder millions of dollars for a Mexican drug cartel. The Feds charged former DEA Deputy Chief of the Office of Financial Operations Paul Campo and friend Robert Sensi for conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Paul Campo and Robert Sensi were charged with narcoterrorism, terrorism, narcotics distribution, and money laundering charges. Campo and Sensi were arrested on Thursday afternoon in New York, according to the DOJ. Campo and Sensi agreed to launder $12 million and participate in narcotics trafficking for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, a/k/a Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion or CJNG. Per the Department of Justice: As part of the scheme, CAMPO and SENSI agreed to launder approximately $12,000,000 of CJNG narcotics proceeds; laundered approximately $750,000 by converting cash into cryptocurrency; and provided a payment for approximately 220 kilograms of cocaine on the understanding that the payment would trigger the distribution and sale of the narcotics worth approximately $5,000,000, for which CAMPO and SENSI would (i) receive directly a portion of the narcotics proceeds as profit; and (ii) receive a further commission upon the laundering of the balance of the narcotics proceeds. Source: thegatewaypundit.com  President Trump's Plan Kash Patel Shuts Down Candace Owens’ Accusations About Charlie Kirk's Murder FBI Director Kash Patel shut down numerous accusations that have been made by podcast host Candace Owens involving the murder of the late co-founder of Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk. During his appearance on Friday on the Sirius XM The Megyn Kelly Show podcast, Kelly started out by asking Patel if they believe they have the “proper suspect in custody” — if Tyler Robinson is “in fact, the man who killed Kirk.” Patel didn’t hesitate in the slightest and answered, “Yes.” The host then brought up one of the wild accusations that have been made by Owens, which includes claiming that Kirk’s own friends and his organization allegedly knew and approved of his murder. Insane. “Do you have any credible reason to believe that anyone connected with the Turning Point organization had anything to do with Charlie’s death?” Kelly asked. Patel’s response: “Zero.” He was then pressed about other claims that Owens has made about the alleged involvement of foreign governments in Kirk’s assassination, like French paratroopers, Egyptian Air Force planes flying out of Provo, Utah, and “potential underground assassins traveling through unseen tunnels,” as the producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, Blake Neff, previously explained. “At this time, the FBI doesn’t have credible information to connect any foreign governments to it,” Patel said. The FBI director made it clear that the investigation is continuing and they are looking into everything, no matter how small. “We are not done just because we arrest someone, just like in the pipe bomber case,” Patel said. “We don’t just say, Okay, we’re done, on to the next. The investigative team continues to work with the Utah authorities, and they’re deriving their own leads and coming back to us saying, ‘Hey, can you look at this piece of information? Can we get a search warrant on this account? What about this individual who is located in X, Y, or Z?'” Source: redstate.com https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1996873942406164855?s=20 https://twitter.com/JesseBWatters/status/1997120806212546797?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1997120806212546797%7Ctwgr%5Ed963eef05511b000b3f2631742a9c8e0f0d3c2a2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fbobhoge%2F2025%2F12%2F05%2Fdc-pipe-bomb-suspect-i-did-it-n2196869  AUTISTIC-LIKE”   SO Why didn't BIDEN'S FBI REALLY catch THIS GUY MS NOW reported that Brian Cole is a Trump supporter. https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1996990984584933729?s=20 January 6 Pipe Bomb Suspect Brian Cole is NOT a Trump Supporter – Family Says He is an “Autistic Recluse” Who Lived in a Basement  January 6 pipe bomb suspect Brian Cole is not a Trump supporter like the legacy media has claimed. Brian Cole's grandmother told The Daily Mail that her grandson has no party affiliation and that he is not a Trump supporter. Cole's family said he is an “autistic recluse” and “computer nerd” who lived in the basement of his parents' Woodbridge, Virginia, home. Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/talk2trav/status/1996716378066505847?s=20   until proven guilt in a court of law THREAD https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1996984026129732020?s=20  written to pardon “all targeted” and “everyone involved in the events surrounding that day”, functions as a class based pardon broad enough to include DOJ linked pre riot conduct like the pipe bomb incident. Because federal authorities folded that episode into the J6 security narrative, the defense says it sits squarely within the pardon's scope. https://twitter.com/Patri0tContr0l/status/1996975974106144923?s=20 is made up. So Kash gets a big win and the NEXT DAY the Fake News comes out with a hit piece based on anonymous sources. I can't believe there are still people out there who can't see through this bullshit. https://twitter.com/TheStormRedux/status/1996722966806028760?s=20   about this FBI is that we are running investigations while providing what we can… This pipe bomb investigation should show the American public that we, while providing information on the pipe bomb over the last 8 months and protecting the integrity of our investigation, gets us to the end point we want. Accountability & transparency… This investigation should show the world how we are going to operate in every single investigation. Arctic Frost specifically, we have HUGE investigation going… and it's gonna take a little more time to peel it back. But no, I'm not gonna let people get off the hook or get a hall pass. I don't care what position you held in the FBI, you're gonna be held accountable. And this DOJ is assuredly backing us.” Love it. We keep getting bits & pieces of the grand conspiracy investigation before ultimately the hammer drops. I'm not sure why this is hard to understand for some… Pam Bondi Gives FBI Marching Orders For Tackling Antifa Terrorists Attorney General Pam Bondi instructed federal law enforcement agents on Thursday to form a list of Antifa groups for potential prosecution, according to multiple reports. Bondi's order is part of a broader counterterrorism plan after President Donald Trump's directives targeting the Antifa movement and organized political violence, Reuters and Bloomberg Law reported, citing a Thursday memo from Bondi. The FBI must provide within 30 days a list of groups “engaged in acts that may constitute domestic terrorism” along with strategies to disrupt them, with an emphasis on left-wing extremists, the memo reportedly says.  Bondi's memo directs law enforcement agencies to unearth whatever intelligence files they have on Antifa groups for investigators and to investigate unsolved domestic terrorism incidents over the past five years, Reuters and Bloomberg Law reported. The incidents may include the “doxxing” of law enforcement officers' personal information and threats against Supreme Court justices. The FBI must also streamline its tip line to allow members of the public to “send media” on suspected domestic terrorism, the memo says, according to Reuters. Source: dailycaller.com  https://twitter.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1996984378983915761?s=20 With the New U.S. National Security Strategy, Trump Revives Monroe Doctrine     Trump administration released the 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS). The intent seems to be a return to the Monroe Doctrine by increasing the United States military presence in the Western Hemisphere, taking on the drug cartels, enhancing border security, making trade deals that are better for the United States, and enhancing American energy production. That’s not the worst high-level take on the NSS, but a look at the actual document is illustrative. The NSS states as its purpose: To ensure that America remains the world's strongest, richest, most powerful, and most successful country for decades to come, our country needs a coherent, focused strategy for how we interact with the world. And to get that right, all Americans need to know what, exactly, it is we are trying to do and why. A “strategy” is a concrete, realistic plan that explains the essential connection between ends and means: it begins from an accurate assessment of what is desired and what tools are available, or can realistically be created, to achieve the desired outcomes. A strategy must evaluate, sort, and prioritize. Not every country, region, issue, or cause—however worthy—can be the focus of American strategy. The purpose of  foreign policy is the protection of core national interests; that is the sole focus of this strategy. One of the more interesting (but not surprising) pieces of this NSS is the overt and robust return to the Monroe Doctrine, an early 19th-century policy intended to restrict further European colonization of the Western Hemisphere and to ensure American dominance in that region. The modern take on this doctrine by the Trump administration uses American power by employing both internal and external security measures. The NSS states: American policy should focus on enlisting regional champions that can help create tolerable stability in the region, even beyond those partners' borders. These nations would help us stop illegal and destabilizing migration, neutralize cartels, nearshore manufacturing, and develop local private economies, among other things. We will reward and encourage the region's governments, political parties, and movements broadly aligned with our principles and strategy. But we must not overlook governments with different outlooks with whom we nonetheless share interests and who want to work with us. Source: redstate.com The Monroe Doctrine is a foundational principle of United States foreign policy, first articulated by President James Monroe in his annual message to Congress on December 2, 1823.   It declared that the Western Hemisphere was no longer open to European colonization or interference, while affirming that the U.S. would not meddle in existing European colonies or internal affairs.   Essentially, it warned European powers—particularly those in the Holy Alliance (Russia, Austria, and Prussia)—against attempting to extend their influence or establish new colonies in the Americas, positioning the U.S. as a protector of independent nations in the region The doctrine emerged amid concerns over European monarchies potentially aiding Spain in reconquering its former Latin American colonies, which had recently gained independence. It was largely drafted by Secretary of State John Quincy Adams and reflected growing American confidence following the War of 1812.  At the time, the U.S. lacked the military power to enforce it fully, so it relied on British naval support, as Britain also opposed European rivals in the Americas for trade reasons.Key excerpts from Monroe’s address include: The American continents “are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers.” Any attempt by Europe to extend its political system to the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as “dangerous to our peace and safety.”   Significance and EvolutionInitially more symbolic than enforceable, the Monroe Doctrine evolved into a justification for U.S. intervention in Latin America during the 19th and 20th centuries. For instance: In the mid-1800s, it intertwined with Manifest Destiny to support U.S. territorial expansion, such as during the Mexican-American War.  President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1904 “Corollary” expanded it to allow U.S. intervention in Latin American countries to prevent European involvement, leading to actions like the occupation of Cuba and the Dominican Republic. It influenced Cold War policies, framing U.S. opposition to communism in the hemisphere as a defense against external threats. Critics, especially in Latin America, have viewed it as a tool for U.S. imperialism, enabling dominance over sovereign nations. Though less invoked today, it remains a symbol of U.S. hemispheric influence and anti-colonial rhetoric. facebook.com https://twitter.com/onechancefreedm/status/1996970776373735933?s=20 https://twitter.com/JoeLang51440671/status/1996992569746567173?s=20   other hand, I can see how we help real allies with aid when needed, as long as we get something of economic value in return. Regardless, NGO's are the root of a lot of EVIL and this will DESTROY a lot them. This is a good thing. https://twitter.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1996951610769961070?s=20 Senate To Confirm 97 More Trump Nominees After Democrat Blockade Fails Republicans will confirm a bloc of eight dozen Trump nominees as soon as next week following an attempted blockade by Senate Democrats. Republican leadership planned Thursday to kick-off the procedural process to confirm 88 of President Donald Trump's nominees in a bloc vote, but were initially thwarted by Democratic Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet, who challenged the package for violating Senate rules. When Republicans refiled the package later on Thursday, the conference included an additional nine nominees, bringing the total to nearly 100.  The Senate has confirmed 314 civilian nominees as of Thursday evening, according to a tally by the Senate Republican Communications Center. The 97-member bloc would bring the Senate to more than 410 civilian confirmations in the first year of Trump's second term. “That far outstrips total confirmations by this point in President Biden's term, and in President Trump's first term as well,” Thune said Thursday. Thune also said that Senate Republicans have virtually cleared the nominations backlog. Before Republicans changed Senate precedent to allow for certain nominees to be confirmed in groups, more than 150 of the president's picks were awaiting floor consideration. The Senate approved a 48-member nominations package in September and an additional 108 of the president's picks in a single group vote in October. Source: dailycaller.com  (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

John Fawcett breaks down today's top stories, including a Supreme Court ruling that allows Texas to utilize its newly redrawn congressional maps, the ongoing investigation into welfare fraud in Minnesota, linking high-profile Democrats to a scandal involving the misuse of federal funds intended for children, the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records and the media's portrayal of related events.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/TYT and use code TYT and get $50 in lineups when you play your first $5 lineup! Benjamin Netanyahu is once again publicly opposing the creation of a Palestinian state. Pete Hegseth reportedly asked a top admiral to resign after months of internal conflict. Trump's renewed focus on the drug war is creating massive new opportunities for defense startups. New documents show Jeffrey Epstein assisted Alan Dershowitz in attacking Mearsheimer and Walt's Israel Lobby. Hosts: Ana Kasparian SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE ☞  https://www.youtube.com/@TheYoungTurks FOLLOW US ON: FACEBOOK  ☞   https://www.facebook.com/theyoungturks TWITTER  ☞       https://twitter.com/TheYoungTurks INSTAGRAM  ☞  https://www.instagram.com/theyoungturks TIKTOK  ☞          https://www.tiktok.com/@theyoungturks

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent publicly blasts the New York Times during an on-stage interview at the Times' own DealBook Summit. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee release newly obtained photos and videos from Jeffrey Epstein's private Caribbean island. DHS launches an immigration crackdown in New Orleans with Governor Jeff Landry's full support. A California doctor becomes the first of five defendants sentenced in connection with Matthew Perry's ketamine-related overdose death.  Masa Chips: Ready to give MASA or Vandy a try? Get 25% off your first order by going to http://masachips.com/MK and using code MK. Walmart: Learn how Walmart is fueling the future of U.S. manufacturing at https://Walmart.com/America-at-work Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.