The Epstein Chronicles

On this edition of the morning update, we hear from Lady Victoria Hervey who is taking up the call to arms for her friends Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell in new, bizarre social media posts that claim that the picture of Virginia and Andrew is fake. She goes on to claim that Maxwell, was nothing more than victim herself.(Commercial at 17:11)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10467497/Prince-Andrews-ex-Lady-Victoria-Hervey-44-says-Ghislaine-Maxwells-trial-witch-hunt.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense filed Motion in Limine #5 titled "Re: Inconclusive Data," seeking to exclude certain evidence deemed inconclusive. The court granted the defense's request to seal this motion, as indicated in an order dated March 3, 2025. Consequently, the specific details and arguments presented in the motion are not publicly accessible.​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State filed a Motion in Limine on February 21, 2025, to restrict the defense from introducing or arguing alternative perpetrator evidence without first meeting specific relevance and admissibility standards as outlined in the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 401, 402, and 403. The State contends that during the investigation, thousands of tips regarding possible perpetrators were received, but none, except those related to the defendant, were substantiated. Allowing the defense to present alternative perpetrator theories without concrete evidence directly connecting others to the homicides could mislead and confuse the jury, result in undue delays, waste time, and unfairly prejudice the State's case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-inLimine5-RE-Inconclusive-Data.pdf022125-States-Motion-in-Limine-RE-Alternative-Perpetrator-Evidence.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of United States v. Combs, S2 24 Cr. 542 (AS), both parties submitted a joint letter on March 12, 2025, in response to the Court's order, outlining the issues to be addressed at the pretrial conference scheduled for March 14, 2025, at 2 p.m., alongside the defendant's arraignment on the superseding indictment. The letter highlights several key points:​Motions in Limine: Both parties have filed motions in limine concerning the admissibility of certain evidence and anticipate addressing these motions during the conference.​Discovery: The defense has requested additional discovery materials, and the Government is in the process of reviewing and producing the relevant documents.​Trial Schedule: Discussion of the anticipated length of the trial and potential scheduling conflicts is planned.​Jury Selection: Both parties seek to address procedures for jury selection, including the use of questionnaires and voir dire processes.​Other Pretrial Matters: Any additional issues that may impact the trial proceedings are to be discussed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.177.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of United States v. Combs, S2 24 Cr. 542 (AS), both parties submitted a joint letter on March 12, 2025, in response to the Court's order, outlining the issues to be addressed at the pretrial conference scheduled for March 14, 2025, at 2 p.m., alongside the defendant's arraignment on the superseding indictment. The letter highlights several key points:​Motions in Limine: Both parties have filed motions in limine concerning the admissibility of certain evidence and anticipate addressing these motions during the conference.​Discovery: The defense has requested additional discovery materials, and the Government is in the process of reviewing and producing the relevant documents.​Trial Schedule: Discussion of the anticipated length of the trial and potential scheduling conflicts is planned.​Jury Selection: Both parties seek to address procedures for jury selection, including the use of questionnaires and voir dire processes.​Other Pretrial Matters: Any additional issues that may impact the trial proceedings are to be discussed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.177.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defendsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case identified as Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's legal team has filed a motion titled "Motion to Strike Death Penalty RE: Autism Spectrum Disorder." This motion asserts that Kohberger's diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diminishes his culpability, undermines the retributive and deterrent objectives of capital punishment, and increases the risk of wrongful conviction and sentencing. The defense emphasizes that ASD impairs communication, reasoning, social skills, and impulse control, factors that should be considered when determining appropriate sentencing.The motion further argues that executing individuals with ASD contradicts evolving standards of decency and that such defendants may struggle to effectively assist in their defense or convey remorse, potentially leading to unfair sentencing. The defense highlights the heightened need for reliability in capital cases and contends that ASD-related impairments could result in misinterpretations by jurors, thereby increasing the likelihood of an erroneous death sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Strike-Death-Penalty-RE-Autism-Spectrum-Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case identified as Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's legal team has filed a motion titled "Motion to Strike Death Penalty RE: Autism Spectrum Disorder." This motion asserts that Kohberger's diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diminishes his culpability, undermines the retributive and deterrent objectives of capital punishment, and increases the risk of wrongful conviction and sentencing. The defense emphasizes that ASD impairs communication, reasoning, social skills, and impulse control, factors that should be considered when determining appropriate sentencing.The motion further argues that executing individuals with ASD contradicts evolving standards of decency and that such defendants may struggle to effectively assist in their defense or convey remorse, potentially leading to unfair sentencing. The defense highlights the heightened need for reliability in capital cases and contends that ASD-related impairments could result in misinterpretations by jurors, thereby increasing the likelihood of an erroneous death sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Strike-Death-Penalty-RE-Autism-Spectrum-Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In December 2024, LaTroya Grayson filed a $15 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that she was drugged and sexually assaulted at one of his parties in New York City in October 2006. According to the complaint, Grayson's half-sibling won a contest through local radio station KJAMZ, which included an all-expenses-paid trip to New York to attend a "Diddy White Party." Upon arrival, the event had been rebranded as a "Black Party." Grayson claims that after consuming less than two premade drinks at the party, she began to feel unwell and attempted to go to the restroom. Her next memory was waking up at Saint Vincent's Medical Center with no recollection of how she arrived there, noticing her shirt was torn, her underwear missing, and her money stolen. She believes she was drugged, assaulted, and robbed. After returning to Oklahoma, Grayson allegedly received a threatening phone call from an anonymous female, warning her against pursuing any action due to Combs' celebrity status. The lawsuit includes supporting documents such as photos from the party and medical records.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he "has never sexually assaulted anyone or engaged in sex trafficking." They emphasize that Grayson admits to having no memory of the events, does not know who was involved, and has never spoken to Combs, labeling her claims as "pure fiction." As of February 2025, Combs remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting trial on separate charges related to sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, to which he has pleaded not guilty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:grayson complaintBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In December 2024, LaTroya Grayson filed a $15 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that she was drugged and sexually assaulted at one of his parties in New York City in October 2006. According to the complaint, Grayson's half-sibling won a contest through local radio station KJAMZ, which included an all-expenses-paid trip to New York to attend a "Diddy White Party." Upon arrival, the event had been rebranded as a "Black Party." Grayson claims that after consuming less than two premade drinks at the party, she began to feel unwell and attempted to go to the restroom. Her next memory was waking up at Saint Vincent's Medical Center with no recollection of how she arrived there, noticing her shirt was torn, her underwear missing, and her money stolen. She believes she was drugged, assaulted, and robbed. After returning to Oklahoma, Grayson allegedly received a threatening phone call from an anonymous female, warning her against pursuing any action due to Combs' celebrity status. The lawsuit includes supporting documents such as photos from the party and medical records.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he "has never sexually assaulted anyone or engaged in sex trafficking." They emphasize that Grayson admits to having no memory of the events, does not know who was involved, and has never spoken to Combs, labeling her claims as "pure fiction." As of February 2025, Combs remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting trial on separate charges related to sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, to which he has pleaded not guilty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:grayson complaintBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew was one of the biggest jewels in Jeffrey Epstein's menagerie of upper crust scoundrels and he never missed a chance to parlay that friendship into benefits for himself. On tonight's episode, we hear once again about Epstein and Maxwell and how they rode their royal pony all the way to legitimacy.(commercial at 13:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10683877/Prince-Andrew-gave-Ghislaine-Maxwell-veneer-respectability-elite-social-circles.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's estate was valued at 634 million dollars when he died. When all was said and done with the compensation fund, the survivors received roughly 1/6 of that money. So, the question is...where did the rest of the money go?(Commercial at 16:03)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/28/business/jeffrey-epstein-estate.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

According to Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn who are the executors for Epstein's estate, the allegations against him are thin and should be tossed from court.The Estate argues that the suit is unconstitutional and that the whole CVA law passed in New York is in itself unconstitutional.Meanwhile Indyke and Kahn are still under the microscope in the Virgin Islands as Denise George decides what she is going to do.Join me as I break it all down.(Commercial at 9:51)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://nypost.com/2020/03/20/executors-of-jeffrey-epsteins-estate-say-victims-lawsuit-is-time-barred/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the ongoing case against Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recent court filings reveal that his defense team plans to argue that the knife sheath found at the crime scene, which contained Kohberger's DNA, may have been planted by the actual perpetrator. Prosecutors have indicated that the defense does not dispute the presence of Kohberger's DNA on the sheath but contends that this evidence does not confirm his presence at the crime scene. Instead, they suggest that the real killer could have deliberately placed the sheath to mislead investigators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kohberger defense team plans to argue knife sheath planted by 'real killer' | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a significant development, Jane Doe, who previously accused Jay-Z of raping her at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards after-party, was recorded admitting that the rapper did not assault her. In the recording, obtained by ABC News, she stated that while Jay-Z was present at the event, he "didn't have anything to do with any sexual acts" involving her. Furthermore, she alleged that her attorney, Tony Buzbee, "pushed" her to include Jay-Z in the lawsuit, suggesting that Buzbee encouraged her to pursue legal action against the rapper.In response, Buzbee denied these allegations, calling them a "blatant lie." He provided a separate recording where Jane Doe refuted claims that she had admitted to lying about Jay-Z's involvement or that Buzbee had coerced her into making false allegations. Despite these conflicting accounts, the lawsuit against Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. Subsequently, Jay-Z filed a defamation lawsuit against Jane Doe and her attorneys, asserting that the false accusations have caused him significant personal and financial harm.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jay-Z Accuser Admits He Never Raped Her and Blames Lawsuit On LawyerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In her forthcoming memoir, former masseuse Monique Giannelloni recounts an unsettling encounter with Prince Andrew in 2000 at Buckingham Palace, orchestrated by Ghislaine Maxwell. Giannelloni alleges that upon her arrival, Prince Andrew immediately disrobed and lay naked on the massage table, a behavior she found inappropriate and indicative of his sense of entitlement. Although he did not make explicit advances, his actions left her uncomfortable and unimpressed, especially considering his royal status. ​Giannelloni also claims that Maxwell attempted to recruit her for Epstein's notorious boat parties, insinuating that participation would involve compromising activities. She declined these invitations, suspecting ulterior motives. Reflecting on her experiences, Giannelloni questions whether Maxwell aimed to involve both her and Prince Andrew in their illicit activities, highlighting the prince's questionable associations with figures like Maxwell and Epstein. ​to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Prince Andrew threw off his bathrobe and jumped on the table': Shocked masseuse reveals bizarre encounter with Royal at Buckingham Palace as new tell all memoir explores his friendship with disgraced pal Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Former Barclays CEO Jes Staley has admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with a member of Jeffrey Epstein's staff at a New York apartment owned by Epstein's brother. This revelation emerged during Staley's testimony in his appeal against the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) proposed lifetime ban and £1.8 million fine for allegedly misleading the regulator about his relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains that, despite this incident, his relationship with Epstein was primarily professional, and he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activitiesJes Staley's admission that he slept with one of Jeffrey Epstein's staff is yet another damning piece of evidence exposing his deep entanglement with the disgraced financier. For years, Staley downplayed his relationship with Epstein, insisting it was purely professional. Now, as he faces a lifetime ban from the financial industry, his story is unraveling. His claim that he was unaware of Epstein's crimes is absurd—Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex trafficking should have been enough for any legitimate banker to sever ties. Instead, Staley maintained a cozy, almost servile relationship, exchanging over 1,000 emails with Epstein and even referring to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” in a message to his daughter. This wasn't just a working relationship; it was an alliance, one that helped Epstein continue operating within elite financial circles while he was actively abusing young girls.Staley's excuse that this sexual encounter was “consensual” is equally disgusting, considering Epstein's well-documented pattern of coercion and trafficking. The idea that any of the women under Epstein's control had true agency is laughable—Epstein hand-picked vulnerable girls, manipulated them, and created an environment where they had no real choice. Whether Staley knew the full extent of Epstein's crimes or not, he willingly participated in the toxic, exploitative ecosystem that Epstein cultivated. His desperate attempts to downplay, deny, and distance himself now only serve to highlight his own moral bankruptcy. If he had any integrity, he would have spoken up years ago. Instead, he's in court, feigning ignorance, hoping to escape punishment while his legacy crumbles under the weight of his own lies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley admits having sex with Jeffrey Epstein's employee in New York building where paedophile trafficked underage girls | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case identified as Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's legal team has filed a motion titled "Motion to Strike Death Penalty RE: Autism Spectrum Disorder." This motion asserts that Kohberger's diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diminishes his culpability, undermines the retributive and deterrent objectives of capital punishment, and increases the risk of wrongful conviction and sentencing. The defense emphasizes that ASD impairs communication, reasoning, social skills, and impulse control, factors that should be considered when determining appropriate sentencing.The motion further argues that executing individuals with ASD contradicts evolving standards of decency and that such defendants may struggle to effectively assist in their defense or convey remorse, potentially leading to unfair sentencing. The defense highlights the heightened need for reliability in capital cases and contends that ASD-related impairments could result in misinterpretations by jurors, thereby increasing the likelihood of an erroneous death sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Strike-Death-Penalty-RE-Autism-Spectrum-Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case identified as Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's legal team has filed a motion titled "Motion to Strike Death Penalty RE: Autism Spectrum Disorder." This motion asserts that Kohberger's diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diminishes his culpability, undermines the retributive and deterrent objectives of capital punishment, and increases the risk of wrongful conviction and sentencing. The defense emphasizes that ASD impairs communication, reasoning, social skills, and impulse control, factors that should be considered when determining appropriate sentencing.The motion further argues that executing individuals with ASD contradicts evolving standards of decency and that such defendants may struggle to effectively assist in their defense or convey remorse, potentially leading to unfair sentencing. The defense highlights the heightened need for reliability in capital cases and contends that ASD-related impairments could result in misinterpretations by jurors, thereby increasing the likelihood of an erroneous death sentence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:022425-Motion-Strike-Death-Penalty-RE-Autism-Spectrum-Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

John Mark Dougan has claimed for years now that he has tapes of Epstein's disgusting friends engaging in disgusting acts. However, besides making the claim time and time again, no videos have ever been produced by Mr. Dougan, who fled to Russia before he could be arrested. Dougan is an ex police officer who says that he was targeted after becoming a whistleblower and that his home was raided in 2016 due to the content on his hard drive. The only problem with Mr. Dougans story is: There is no proof. In this episode we once again take a look at the claims made by Mr. Dougan and see if there is any validity to the claims being made.(commercial at 9:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comEx-cop claims he has sex tape of Prince Andrew filmed by Epstein stashed away - and FBI knows about it | The SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The saga of the sealed document is at and end. Epstein's estate is now in agreement with the other parties involved about dislcosing the sealed document to Prince Andrew that he says will expose the claim as baseless.(commercial at 10:59)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/jeffrey-epsteins-estate-agrees-to-disclose-confidential-deal-requested-by-prince-andrew-court-docs-say/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein always seemed to find a way to come out on top in just about every financial deal he was involved in. In this episode, we take a look at how Jeffrey Epstein brought in a cool two hundred million right after the great recession of 2008 even after being a known sex offender and losing his biggest clients.(commercial at 7:35)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-200-million-career-switch-financial-services-dna-research-2019-10Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State responded to the Defendant's Motion in Limine #11, which sought to exclude evidence related to Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). The Defendant indicated an intention to exclude IGG evidence and not to call expert witnesses on the matter. In light of this, the State agreed not to introduce IGG evidence or related expert testimony. Instead, the State proposed to present that law enforcement received a "tip," without specifying its source or content, which led to the identification of the Defendant. ​This approach aims to streamline the trial by focusing on direct evidence linking the Defendant to the crime, while avoiding potential complexities and disputes surrounding the IGG process. By mutually agreeing to exclude IGG evidence, both parties seek to prevent unnecessary confusion or prejudice that could arise from discussing the investigative techniques used during the investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031025+States+Response+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+Re+Exclude+IGG+Evidence.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State responded to the Defendant's Motion in Limine #11, which sought to exclude evidence related to Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). The Defendant indicated an intention to exclude IGG evidence and not to call expert witnesses on the matter. In light of this, the State agreed not to introduce IGG evidence or related expert testimony. Instead, the State proposed to present that law enforcement received a "tip," without specifying its source or content, which led to the identification of the Defendant. ​This approach aims to streamline the trial by focusing on direct evidence linking the Defendant to the crime, while avoiding potential complexities and disputes surrounding the IGG process. By mutually agreeing to exclude IGG evidence, both parties seek to prevent unnecessary confusion or prejudice that could arise from discussing the investigative techniques used during the investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031025+States+Response+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+Re+Exclude+IGG+Evidence.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Investigative genetic genealogist CeCe Moore has commented on the FBI's use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) in the Bryan Kohberger case, emphasizing the importance of ethical practices to maintain public support for this investigative tool. Moore noted that while the FBI's actions did not violate the law, they did breach the terms of service of certain genealogy databases, raising privacy concerns. She stressed that the continued success of IGG relies on public trust, which can be undermined if investigators do not adhere to ethical standards.Moore highlighted that the effectiveness of IGG depends on public participation and the willingness of individuals to share their genetic information. She cautioned that misuse or perceived overreach in employing IGG could lead to public backlash, potentially limiting its future utility in solving crimes. Therefore, maintaining ethical guidelines is crucial to preserve the public's trust and the viability of IGG as a law enforcement tool.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger case: FBI's DNA tactics legal, but they raise another concern | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Maui Police Chief John Pelletier has been implicated in a lawsuit alleging his involvement in covering up a 2018 gang rape purportedly orchestrated by Sean "Diddy" Combs, NFL star Odell Beckham Jr., and comedian Druski. The plaintiff, Ashley Parham, claims that Pelletier, then a Las Vegas police captain, impersonated a sheriff's deputy to respond to her 911 call in Orinda, California, attempting to conceal the reported assault. Both Pelletier and the accused celebrities have vehemently denied these allegationsThis lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who is currently detained without bail on federal charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. His trial is scheduled for May 5, 2025. The amended lawsuit, seeking a jury trial, also implicates Beckham Jr. and Druski, who have publicly refuted the claims. Maui's mayor has called for Pelletier to be placed on administrative leave pending further investigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Maui Police Chief John Pelletier named in Diddy lawsuit as he's accused of covering up woman's rape in 2018 | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley testified that Jeffrey Epstein often possessed more knowledge about the bank's upper echelons than he did. Staley acknowledged that their relationship, which began as a business association, evolved into a personal friendship. He conceded that he "misspoke" when previously downplaying the closeness of their connection.During his tenure at JPMorgan, Staley reportedly advocated for retaining Epstein as a client despite internal concerns about Epstein's involvement in human trafficking and suspicious cash withdrawals. Staley allegedly facilitated discussions between Epstein and the bank's top lawyer, urging consideration of Epstein's perspective.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan banker Jes Staley claims Jeffrey Epstein knew more about 'upper levels' of bank than he didBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. government has opposed Sean “Diddy” Combs' motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants in his criminal case, arguing that Combs has failed to meet the legal standard required for suppression. The prosecution asserts that the warrants were lawfully obtained based on substantial probable cause and that Combs' claims of material omissions and falsehoods in the warrant affidavits do not meet the high burden necessary for a Franks hearing (a legal proceeding to challenge the validity of a search warrant). The government contends that the search warrants were specific, targeting evidence directly related to Combs' alleged crimes, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and other offenses. They also argue that any alleged omissions or misstatements in the affidavits were not material to the finding of probable cause and did not demonstrate intentional deception by law enforcement.Furthermore, the opposition brief emphasizes that the search warrants were not overly broad and complied with legal standards, making them valid under the Fourth Amendment. The government argues that even if there were any technical flaws in the warrant applications, the good faith exception applies, meaning law enforcement acted within their authority and in reasonable reliance on judicial approval. Additionally, the prosecution maintains that the evidence collected is crucial for proving Combs' alleged criminal enterprise, including coercion, violence, and obstruction efforts. As a result, they urge the court to reject Combs' motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used in the upcoming trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.171.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. government has opposed Sean “Diddy” Combs' motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants in his criminal case, arguing that Combs has failed to meet the legal standard required for suppression. The prosecution asserts that the warrants were lawfully obtained based on substantial probable cause and that Combs' claims of material omissions and falsehoods in the warrant affidavits do not meet the high burden necessary for a Franks hearing (a legal proceeding to challenge the validity of a search warrant). The government contends that the search warrants were specific, targeting evidence directly related to Combs' alleged crimes, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and other offenses. They also argue that any alleged omissions or misstatements in the affidavits were not material to the finding of probable cause and did not demonstrate intentional deception by law enforcement.Furthermore, the opposition brief emphasizes that the search warrants were not overly broad and complied with legal standards, making them valid under the Fourth Amendment. The government argues that even if there were any technical flaws in the warrant applications, the good faith exception applies, meaning law enforcement acted within their authority and in reasonable reliance on judicial approval. Additionally, the prosecution maintains that the evidence collected is crucial for proving Combs' alleged criminal enterprise, including coercion, violence, and obstruction efforts. As a result, they urge the court to reject Combs' motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used in the upcoming trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.171.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The hits keep coming for JP Morgan Chase as the wider world continues to get a look at the audacious nature in which they conducted themselves. One of those windows that we've peaked in recently revealed emails sent from executives at JP Morgan to their fellow executives discussing Epstein and his crimes. In this episode, we hear more about Mary Erdoes, an employee at JP Morgan Chase at the time Epstein was a client and someone, who the USVI says knows more than she is letting on.(commercial at 13:12)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan exec met with Epstein for YEARS after pedophile conviction | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had many ways to intimidate their victims. One of the major ways they were able to keep control, however, was the dossiers that were compiled on their victims. In this episode, we hear more about the malicious scheme.(commercial at 15:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-kept-dossiers-on-his-victims-to-blackmail-themBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

One of the most important aspects when talking about Jeffrey Epstein and the crimes committed by his criminal enterprise is the financial angle. For all of the platitudes we have heard from the investigators, we have still yet to see a real, robust investigation into the financial aspect of the case. Nothing personifies that like his corrupt charities. On this episode, we explore some of those charities and how they were manipulated and used to help shield Epstein and his activities.(commercial at 11:58)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/26/business/jeffrey-epstein-charity.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On this morning's edition of the show, we take a look at the headlines from overnight and talk a little bit more about Maxwell and Epstein's propensity to search out the most vulnerable amongst us for their abuse.(commercial at 13:52)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.ft.com/content/0b9d93da-1687-4eb1-bd53-0a84a1b40dffBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. government has opposed Sean “Diddy” Combs' motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants in his criminal case, arguing that Combs has failed to meet the legal standard required for suppression. The prosecution asserts that the warrants were lawfully obtained based on substantial probable cause and that Combs' claims of material omissions and falsehoods in the warrant affidavits do not meet the high burden necessary for a Franks hearing (a legal proceeding to challenge the validity of a search warrant). The government contends that the search warrants were specific, targeting evidence directly related to Combs' alleged crimes, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and other offenses. They also argue that any alleged omissions or misstatements in the affidavits were not material to the finding of probable cause and did not demonstrate intentional deception by law enforcement.Furthermore, the opposition brief emphasizes that the search warrants were not overly broad and complied with legal standards, making them valid under the Fourth Amendment. The government argues that even if there were any technical flaws in the warrant applications, the good faith exception applies, meaning law enforcement acted within their authority and in reasonable reliance on judicial approval. Additionally, the prosecution maintains that the evidence collected is crucial for proving Combs' alleged criminal enterprise, including coercion, violence, and obstruction efforts. As a result, they urge the court to reject Combs' motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used in the upcoming trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.171.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. government has opposed Sean “Diddy” Combs' motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants in his criminal case, arguing that Combs has failed to meet the legal standard required for suppression. The prosecution asserts that the warrants were lawfully obtained based on substantial probable cause and that Combs' claims of material omissions and falsehoods in the warrant affidavits do not meet the high burden necessary for a Franks hearing (a legal proceeding to challenge the validity of a search warrant). The government contends that the search warrants were specific, targeting evidence directly related to Combs' alleged crimes, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and other offenses. They also argue that any alleged omissions or misstatements in the affidavits were not material to the finding of probable cause and did not demonstrate intentional deception by law enforcement.Furthermore, the opposition brief emphasizes that the search warrants were not overly broad and complied with legal standards, making them valid under the Fourth Amendment. The government argues that even if there were any technical flaws in the warrant applications, the good faith exception applies, meaning law enforcement acted within their authority and in reasonable reliance on judicial approval. Additionally, the prosecution maintains that the evidence collected is crucial for proving Combs' alleged criminal enterprise, including coercion, violence, and obstruction efforts. As a result, they urge the court to reject Combs' motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used in the upcoming trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.171.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. government has opposed Sean “Diddy” Combs' motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants in his criminal case, arguing that Combs has failed to meet the legal standard required for suppression. The prosecution asserts that the warrants were lawfully obtained based on substantial probable cause and that Combs' claims of material omissions and falsehoods in the warrant affidavits do not meet the high burden necessary for a Franks hearing (a legal proceeding to challenge the validity of a search warrant). The government contends that the search warrants were specific, targeting evidence directly related to Combs' alleged crimes, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and other offenses. They also argue that any alleged omissions or misstatements in the affidavits were not material to the finding of probable cause and did not demonstrate intentional deception by law enforcement.Furthermore, the opposition brief emphasizes that the search warrants were not overly broad and complied with legal standards, making them valid under the Fourth Amendment. The government argues that even if there were any technical flaws in the warrant applications, the good faith exception applies, meaning law enforcement acted within their authority and in reasonable reliance on judicial approval. Additionally, the prosecution maintains that the evidence collected is crucial for proving Combs' alleged criminal enterprise, including coercion, violence, and obstruction efforts. As a result, they urge the court to reject Combs' motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used in the upcoming trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.171.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Bryan Kohberger's defense team has intensified efforts to prevent the imposition of the death penalty in his upcoming trial for the alleged murders of four University of Idaho students. Recent legal maneuvers include motions to prohibit the use of potentially prejudicial terms such as "murder," "psychopath," and "sociopath" during the trial, as well as references to "bushy eyebrows," which a surviving roommate used to describe the intruder. The defense argues that such language could bias the jury against Kohberger. Additionally, they seek to limit the display of crime scene photographs to avoid inflaming jurors' emotions.In a separate motion, Kohberger's attorney, Anne Taylor, revealed that he has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). She contends that this diagnosis should exempt him from the death penalty, asserting that ASD reduces his culpability and poses a risk of wrongful conviction due to potential misinterpretation of his behaviors by jurors. However, legal experts suggest that an autism diagnosis is unlikely to prevent the application of the death penalty, as current legal precedents do not consider ASD a barrier to such sentencing.source:Bryan Kohberger defense ramps up legal maneuvers in bid to avoid death row | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Parham complaint FINAL-3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Parham complaint FINAL-3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein had his fingers in many pies. Whether it was funding these projects, attempting to fund these projects or being involved indirectly, Epstein was always on the lookout for the next "best" deal. He found one of those deals with Ehud Barak and the company Carbyne. In this episode, we take a look at how Epstein provided the seed money for this company and how his involvement in the company has just been glossed over and avoided. (commercial at 7:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.timesofisrael.com/jeffrey-epstein-was-ehud-baraks-business-partner-as-late-as-2015-report/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After months of wondering if Ghislaine Maxwell would be granted a new trial on the basis of juror malfeasance the way is now over. Judge Nathan ruled today that Maxwell did not have the right to a new trial and that the evidence she presented did not meet the burden of proof needed to throw out her indictment and give her a fresh trial. So now, we move on to the sentencing phase.(commercial at 7:38)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/01/us/ghislaine-maxwell-juror-trial/index.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, a witness identified as "Kate" testified that Maxwell groomed her for Jeffrey Epstein's abuse when she was 17. She recounted how Maxwell befriended her, introduced her to Epstein, and normalized giving him sexualized massages. Maxwell allegedly told Kate that Epstein needed regular massages to stay healthy and that it would be a way to help him. Kate also testified that Maxwell arranged the encounters, gave her schoolgirl outfits to wear, and encouraged her to recruit other young women. While Kate was above the legal age of consent at the time, her testimony was allowed to show Maxwell's pattern of recruitment and manipulation, reinforcing the prosecution's argument that Maxwell was a key facilitator in Epstein's abuse network.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we take a look back at the time that Ghislaine Maxwell hired a musician to compose a song praising Jeffrey Epstein and his disgusting ways.To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.com(Commercial at 13:36)Source:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12235042/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-24-hour-erections/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Carolyn Adriano died from an accidental drug overdose in May of this year, but in reality it was Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein's abuse that led to her death. After suffering years of abuse at the hands of Maxwell and Epstein, Carolyn was "aged out" because she hit the age of 18 and from there things continued to spiral. Experiencing trauma can have profound and lasting effects on an individual's mental and emotional well-being. Some people who suffer trauma turn to drugs as a coping mechanism, seeking relief from the intense psychological pain and distress that trauma can bring. This summary explores the complex relationship between trauma and substance abuse, shedding light on the factors that drive individuals to self-medicate with drugs.Trauma, whether caused by violence, accidents, natural disasters, or other distressing events, can lead to feelings of helplessness, anxiety, depression, and flashbacks. These emotional responses can be overwhelming, and some individuals may resort to substance abuse as a way to numb their pain and temporarily escape from the traumatic memories.Several key factors contribute to the connection between trauma and drug use:Emotional Relief: Drugs like alcohol, opioids, or stimulants can temporarily alleviate feelings of sadness, fear, and anxiety. Individuals may use drugs to experience emotional relief, even if it's temporary.Self-Medication: Some people turn to drugs as a form of self-medication to cope with their symptoms. They may not have access to or awareness of healthier coping strategies, such as therapy or support groups.Escapism: The effects of certain drugs can create a sense of detachment from reality, allowing those who have experienced trauma to temporarily escape from painful memories and emotions.Peer Pressure: Social environments where drug use is prevalent can encourage individuals to try substances, especially if they are already struggling with the aftermath of trauma. This can lead to a cycle of drug abuse as a means of fitting in or seeking connection.Biological Factors: Trauma can affect brain chemistry and increase the vulnerability to addiction. It can lead to changes in the reward system of the brain, making individuals more susceptible to substance abuse.Risk of Re-traumatization: Engaging in risky behaviors associated with substance abuse can increase the risk of re-traumatization, perpetuating a cycle of trauma and addiction.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking victim OD'd but really it was murder | Toronto SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode we hear more about Jeffrey Epstein's "secret" girlfriend, Children's author, Shelley Anne Lewis. Her nickname? Chocolate Sauce. Let's see where she fits in.(Commercial at 8:49)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://nypost.com/2020/08/02/everything-you-need-to-know-about-jeffrey-epsteins-secret-girlfriend/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Parham complaint FINAL-3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Parham complaint FINAL-3Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.