The Moscow Murders and More

An Idaho judge rejected Bryan Kohberger's attempt to avoid the death penalty by claiming he has autism, calling the defense's argument “hollow” and legally insufficient. Judge John Judge ruled that merely alleging a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder does not meet the legal threshold for striking the death penalty, especially without substantial evidence that it impaired Kohberger's ability to understand his actions or conform to the law. The decision marks a significant setback for the defense, as prosecutors continue to pursue capital punishment for Kohberger, who is accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in a brutal 2022 stabbing attack.Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case filed a motion requesting the court's permission to conduct their own mental health evaluation of the defendant after his legal team claimed he has a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. The state argued that because the defense may use this diagnosis to avoid the death penalty or influence jurors during sentencing, the prosecution must be allowed to independently assess Kohberger's mental state to verify the claims. Prosecutors emphasized that fairness requires reciprocal access to psychological evaluations if mental health becomes part of the defense strategy, particularly in a capital case involving the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge rejects Bryan Kohberger's bid to escape death penalty in Idaho student murders | Fox NewsProsecutors want to do their own evaluation of Bryan Kohberger's mental health | News | kxly.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On Day 6 of Karen Read's retrial, key prosecution witness Jennifer McCabe provided emotional testimony about the events surrounding the death of Boston police officer John O'Keefe. McCabe, a close friend of both Read and O'Keefe, recounted the early morning of January 29, 2022, when she and Read discovered O'Keefe's body in the snow outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts. She described Read as hysterical, repeatedly asking, “Did I hit him?” and crawling over O'Keefe's body in distress. McCabe also addressed a controversial Google search for “how long to die in cold,” which prosecutors allege she made at Read's request after finding the body. The defense contends the search occurred earlier and is part of a broader cover-up to frame Read.Earlier in the day, digital forensics expert Ian Whiffin testified about cell phone data from O'Keefe and McCabe. Whiffin stated that O'Keefe's phone data indicated he never entered the house where the party occurred, challenging the defense's theory that he was killed inside and later moved outside. However, under cross-examination, Whiffin acknowledged that the phone's location data had a margin of error that could place it inside the house. Additionally, Judge Beverly Cannone ruled that the defense could present testimony from their crash reconstruction experts, despite previous violations of court orders, but issued a stern warning to the defense to adhere strictly to courtroom rules moving forward.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jen McCabe begins testimony in Karen Read trial; judge warns defense "no more nonsense" - CBS BostonBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Hollywood fixers are the shadowy operatives who ensure that the dark secrets of the rich and famous stay buried. From the Golden Era of Hollywood to the present day, fixers have used a combination of threats, bribes, and strategic alliances with law enforcement and the media to manipulate stories and protect the images of the stars. Figures like Eddie Mannix, Anthony Pellicano, and more recently Faheem Muhammad, have played crucial roles in managing scandals, orchestrating cover-ups, and maintaining the glamour of Hollywood. These fixers often work behind the scenes, silencing victims, negotiating settlements, and leveraging connections to keep their clients untouchable. Their methods have evolved over the decades, from outright coercion and cover-ups to sophisticated crisis management strategies in the age of social media..Despite a more transparent culture and the rapid spread of information, the role of the fixer in Hollywood remains indispensable. High-profile individuals still require damage control to protect their image and careers, and modern fixers employ a mix of old-school intimidation tactics and new-age social media manipulation to get the job done. The allure of fame and power means that for every scandal that surfaces, there are countless others that remain hidden due to the invisible hands of fixers. Hollywood's silver curtain remains firmly drawn, hiding the darkness that lies beneath the glamorous facade, with fixers continuing to operate in the shadows to keep it that way.(commercial at 8:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A serial killer is an individual who commits a series of intentional and premeditated murders, typically targeting multiple victims over an extended period of time. This specific type of criminal behavior is characterized by several key features:Pattern of Killings: Serial killers have a distinct pattern when it comes to selecting their victims and executing their crimes. They may have specific preferences regarding the victim's age, gender, appearance, or occupation.Motive: Serial killers often have complex psychological motivations for their actions. Motives can vary widely and may include a desire for power and control, sexual gratification, a need to satisfy twisted fantasies, or a compulsion driven by mental disorders.Cooling-Off Periods: After each murder, serial killers typically experience a "cooling-off" period, during which they lie low and refrain from committing further crimes. This period allows them to avoid detection and continue their killing spree.Multiple Crime Scenes: Serial killers usually commit murders in different locations, sometimes spanning across different cities, states, or even countries. This geographical mobility can make it difficult for law enforcement to connect the crimes.Signature: Many serial killers have a unique "signature" or modus operandi, which are specific behaviors or rituals they perform at the crime scene. These signatures are distinctive elements that set their crimes apart from others and are often driven by the killer's psychological needs.Lack of Connection to Victims: Unlike other types of murderers, serial killers typically have little or no personal connection to their victims. They choose victims based on certain characteristics that fulfill their fantasies or urges.Psychological Profile: Serial killers often display psychopathic or sociopathic traits, including a lack of empathy, remorse, and a propensity for manipulating others. Many have experienced troubled childhoods or traumatic events, contributing to the development of their violent tendencies.Media Attention: Serial killer cases often attract significant media attention due to the horrifying nature of their crimes, resulting in widespread fear and public interest.Investigating and apprehending serial killers is an intricate and challenging task for law enforcement agencies. It involves thorough profiling, collaboration between jurisdictions, forensic analysis, and sometimes luck. Understanding the psychology and motives behind their actions is essential in developing strategies to prevent and solve such crimes.According to the New York Times, serial killings are a thing of the past and due to technology the instances of serial killings are far and few between. Meanwhile, there have been at least four serial killers caught in the past few months, calling into question the whole article from the Times.So, let's dive in and have a look!(commercial at 11:37)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Serial Killings Like the Gilgo Beach Murders Are Becoming Rarer in the U.S. - The New York Times (nytimes.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

As we hit the one year mark of the murders in Moscow, the man who is on trial for those murders continues to await his fate after waiving his right to a speedy trial. As he waits, the prosecution continues to methodically collect evidence that they hope to use to secure a conviction when the trial finally arrives.In this episode, we take a look at the DNA evidence collected against Bryan Kohberger and how much weight that DNA evidence is going to carry with the jurors when the time finally arrives for Bryan Kohberger to face Judge and Jury in a courtroom in Idaho.(commercial at 7:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DNA evidence alone is not enough to convict Bryan Kohberger: trial expert (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

An incel, short for "involuntary celibate," is an individual, usually male, who identifies as unable to form romantic or sexual relationships with others despite a strong desire to do so. Incels often believe that their lack of success in forming relationships is due to physical appearance or other factors that are beyond their control.They may also harbor feelings of resentment or anger towards those who are successful in forming romantic relationships.Many incels congregate online in forums and social media groups where they share their experiences and beliefs with each other. Unfortunately, some of these online communities promote extreme and often harmful ideologies, including misogyny, racism, and violence. As a result, incel culture has become associated with a toxic and dangerous subculture that promotes hatred towards women and others.In this episode, we take a look at what an Incel is and if Bryan Kohberger fits the mold.(commercial at 10:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Alleged Idaho Murderer Bryan Kohberger is Straight Out of the Incel Playbook - Air MailBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-29-23One of the main factors when a death penalty case hits the courts is how the family of the murdered victim feels about the punishment. It will be no different when the time comes in Idaho and we know that the Mogen's and the Goncalves' support the ultimate penalty for Bryan Kohberger if he is found guilty.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murder house victims' families will seek the death penalty for accused killer Bryan Kohberger | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge Steven J. Hippler serves as the Administrative District Judge for Idaho's Fourth Judicial District, overseeing Ada, Boise, Elmore, and Valley Counties. Appointed in 2014, he is known for handling both high-profile criminal cases and complex civil matters. His notable cases include sentencing the parents of 9-year-old Emrik Osuna to life in prison for torturing and killing their child, and presiding over the upcoming trial of Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. Hippler is respected for his meticulous, fair approach to justice and his strong stance on severe criminal cases.In this episode, we take a look at the profile of the new Judge overseeing the Bryan Kohberger trial.(commercial at 9:29)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Idaho student murders Judge Steven Hippler takes Bryan Kohberger case | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Idaho Supreme Court has granted a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial, moving it from Latah County to Ada County. This decision was made after Kohberger's defense raised concerns over finding an impartial jury in the original county due to the high-profile nature of the case. Kohberger is accused of the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022, a crime that has garnered significant media attention and community impact.In addition to the venue change, the Idaho courts have assigned District Judge Steven Hippler from the Fourth Judicial District to oversee the case moving forward. Kohberger, who has been in custody since his arrest, will be transferred to the Ada County Jail as the trial preparations continue. This move aims to ensure a fair trial by reducing local bias that could influence the outcome. The upcoming proceedings are expected to be closely watched as the legal process advances in a new jurisdiction.(commercial at 8:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge announces new location for Idaho murders trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Brady Rule is a legal principle that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense in criminal cases. The rule is named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland (1963), which held that the prosecution has a constitutional obligation under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.The Brady Rule applies to all evidence that is favorable to the defendant, including evidence that tends to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. The rule also requires the prosecution to disclose any evidence that is known to the government, whether or not the prosecution intends to use the evidence at trial. This includes evidence that is in the possession of law enforcement agencies, as well as evidence that is in the possession of other government agencies, such as intelligence agencies.In this episode, we discuss the new information and how it may come into play during the trial.(commercial at 6:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho prosecutors disclosing info about 'internal affairs investigation' related to officer on Kohberger case | Fox NewsSource:Giglio Information Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Serial killer long-haul truckers are a subset of serial killers who operate within the trucking industry, often using their jobs to facilitate their crimes. Common characteristics include:Mobile Lifestyle: Their job allows them to travel extensively, providing opportunities to commit crimes across different locations and jurisdictions.Isolated Victims: Truckers may target victims along their routes, often selecting transient individuals like sex workers or hitchhikers who are less likely to be reported missing.Method of Disposal: They may dispose of victims' bodies in remote locations along highways or in areas unfamiliar to them, making it challenging for law enforcement to connect the crimes.Interstate Jurisdiction: Crimes committed by long-haul truckers can span multiple states, complicating investigations and coordination among law enforcement agencies.Pattern Recognition: Investigators may use travel logs, toll booth records, and other data to identify patterns in a trucker's movements and potentially link them to unsolved crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:FBI hunting 500 serial killer truckers loose on America's roads: Their favorite highway for finding victims revealed - and inside their mobile 'rape and torture chambers' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean “Diddy” Combs is reportedly considering using his history of drug abuse and its impact on his mental state as part of his legal defense in his upcoming criminal trial. Sources close to the case indicate that Diddy's legal team may argue that prolonged substance abuse affected his judgment, behavior, and mental capacity during the incidents at the center of the charges against him. This potential strategy would aim to mitigate his responsibility by framing his actions as being heavily influenced by addiction-related impairment rather than premeditation or clear intent.The possibility of a diminished capacity defense suggests that Diddy's team may attempt to portray him as struggling with deep-seated addiction issues at the time, which could, if successful, influence sentencing or lead to reduced charges. However, relying on such a defense carries major risks, as it would require Diddy to publicly admit to extensive drug use and expose him to further scrutiny regarding his lifestyle and decision-making. Prosecutors are expected to aggressively challenge any claims that drug use excuses his alleged misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers claim he might not have been mentally capable of crimes due to drug useBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

During Monday's proceedings in Karen Read's retrial, the defense's crash reconstruction expert, Daniel Wolfe, admitted under cross-examination that he had broken a court sequestration order during Read's first trial by sending notes to the defense team. Sequestration rules are designed to prevent witnesses from being influenced by others' testimony, but Wolfe acknowledged forwarding a series of observations while court was in session in 2023. This disclosure led Judge Beverly Cannone to pause the trial for an evidentiary hearing to assess the severity and potential impact of Wolfe's actions. The revelation was a major blow to Read's defense, which had heavily leaned on Wolfe's expert analysis to challenge the prosecution's narrative about how Boston police officer John O'Keefe died.The prosecution hammered Wolfe's breach to cast doubt on his objectivity, suggesting that his communications may have improperly influenced trial strategy. Meanwhile, the defense attempted to frame Wolfe's notes as technical and benign, arguing they were not intended to shape the trial's outcome. Wolfe also testified Monday that based on his analysis, he believes O'Keefe was struck by a vehicle — but crucially, he could not conclusively say whether it was Karen Read's SUV that hit him. This admission, combined with his sequestration violation, weakened the strength of his testimony at a pivotal moment in Read's second trial, where she faces serious charges including second-degree murder and manslaughter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Expert witness in Karen Read case violated sequestration order, digital evidence disputed | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Newly released court documents reveal that surveillance cameras played a crucial role in tracking Bryan Kohberger's movements — as well as those of the victims — in the hours leading up to the University of Idaho murders. Investigators pieced together video footage from a network of cameras across Moscow, Idaho, to map out the victims' final evening and Kohberger's alleged path both before and after the killings. This surveillance helped authorities narrow the timeframe of the crime and identify Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra, which was seen repeatedly driving near the crime scene around the time of the murders.According to the documents, camera footage showed Kohberger's vehicle leaving his Pullman apartment late at night, circling the victims' neighborhood multiple times, and then quickly departing the area after the estimated time of the murders. Additional video captured the victims at various locations on the night of November 12 into the early hours of November 13, including stops at a bar and a food truck. This comprehensive surveillance trail was key evidence that eventually led authorities to focus on Kohberger as a suspect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Map: Alleged paths of Kohberger, Idaho victims via cameras | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticityto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 2-7-23On this edition of the morning update, we dive right back into the headlines from overnight that we might have missed and see where things currently stand in the investigation into Bryan Kohberger and the Moscow Murders.(commercial at 7:06)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders latest news: Bryan Kohberger case gag order fought by victim Kaylee Goncalves' family | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode, we are diving right back into the court documents and this time we are taking a look at Bryan Kohberger's objection to the gag order being amended or removed.(commercial at 14:43)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:020923 Objection to Motion to Appeal Amend andor Clarify Nondissemination Order.pdf (idaho.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-25-23Bryan Kohberger has been indicted for the murder of the Moscow four. However, it has been quite the journey to get to this point. From twists and turns in the case to new revelations, we have seen it all in the past seven months.In this episode, we take a look at how things started, directly after the murders to where things currently stand as of today.(commercial at 11:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho college killings, suspect Bryan Kohberger: what we know | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-25-23Bryan Kohberger has been indicted for the murder of the Moscow four. However, it has been quite the journey to get to this point. From twists and turns in the case to new revelations, we have seen it all in the past seven months.In this episode, we take a look at how things started, directly after the murders to where things currently stand as of today.(commercial at 11:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho college killings, suspect Bryan Kohberger: what we know | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 2-6-23The presence of a murder weapon can be a crucial piece of evidence in securing a conviction, but it is not the only factor. The murder weapon can help establish the means by which the crime was committed, but it does not necessarily prove that the person who committed the crime is guilty. Other factors, such as eyewitness testimony, DNA evidence, and motive, can also play a role in securing a conviction. The overall strength of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses will ultimately determine the outcome of the case.In this episode, we hear from several legal experts about the importance of securing the murder weapon for the prosecution and what it will mean if no murder weapon is recovered.(commercial at 8:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Is Recovery of Idaho Murder Weapon Crucial? Experts Weigh In (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a move that was not totally unexpected, prosecutors in Moscow have opted to go the Grand Jury route when dealing with Bryan Kohberger and his indictment by the state. With this superseded indictment, it helps the state bypass any sort of surprises at the preliminary hearing and it also keeps Bethany Funke from having to potentially take the stand.Kohberger will still make his appearance in Latah County court on the 22nd in regard to the Gag order and the challenge made to it by the media and Goncalves family.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger indicted by secret grand jury and will be arraigned for gruesome quadruple killing | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge Hippler ruled that the State must specifically and clearly disclose any expert testimony it intends to present at Bryan Kohberger's trial. The judge found that broad, vague, or incomplete expert disclosures would be unfair to the defense and ordered that any expert testimony not properly disclosed in advance would be excluded. The prosecution is required to identify the substance of the expert opinions, the underlying bases for those opinions, and how the experts reached their conclusions.The ruling emphasized that prosecutors must strictly comply with Idaho's discovery rules and that they are not permitted to introduce new or previously undisclosed expert testimony at trial. While the State is still allowed to call expert witnesses, it must provide detailed, timely disclosures to prevent unfair surprise. The decision reinforced the court's commitment to ensuring a fair trial and protecting Kohberger's constitutional right to prepare his defense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Vague+and+Undisclosed+Expert+Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge Hippler ruled that the State must specifically and clearly disclose any expert testimony it intends to present at Bryan Kohberger's trial. The judge found that broad, vague, or incomplete expert disclosures would be unfair to the defense and ordered that any expert testimony not properly disclosed in advance would be excluded. The prosecution is required to identify the substance of the expert opinions, the underlying bases for those opinions, and how the experts reached their conclusions.The ruling emphasized that prosecutors must strictly comply with Idaho's discovery rules and that they are not permitted to introduce new or previously undisclosed expert testimony at trial. While the State is still allowed to call expert witnesses, it must provide detailed, timely disclosures to prevent unfair surprise. The decision reinforced the court's commitment to ensuring a fair trial and protecting Kohberger's constitutional right to prepare his defense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+RE+Vague+and+Undisclosed+Expert+Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs has reportedly rejected a plea deal recently offered by federal prosecutors, signaling that he intends to fight the extensive criminal charges he is facing rather than seek an early resolution. The plea offer came as part of the sprawling investigation into allegations of sex trafficking, racketeering, drug distribution, and violent crimes connected to Combs' empire. Sources close to the case suggest the rejected deal would have required Diddy to plead guilty to multiple federal counts, likely carrying a substantial prison sentence, in exchange for avoiding a potentially even harsher outcome at trial. Instead, Combs' legal team has opted to prepare for a courtroom battle, maintaining that he is innocent of the allegations and determined to clear his name.This decision comes at a time when prosecutors appear to be intensifying their efforts, with additional grand jury subpoenas issued and rumors swirling about more cooperating witnesses stepping forward. Legal experts suggest Diddy's refusal to take the deal could either be a bold show of confidence in his defense strategy—or a risky gamble, given the breadth of evidence reportedly in federal hands, including alleged financial records, video evidence, and testimony from former associates. If convicted at trial, Diddy could face decades in federal prison, with prosecutors reportedly pushing to frame the charges under statutes carrying mandatory minimums. The stakes have now escalated dramatically, setting the stage for what could become one of the highest-profile celebrity trials in decades.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean Combs rejects plea dealBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the fourth day of Karen Read's 2025 retrial, the jury visited the alleged crime scene at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts, where Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe was found unresponsive in the snow on January 29, 2022. During the visit, jurors examined the property and observed Read's Lexus SUV, which was parked outside the home. Prosecutors directed the jury's attention to the vehicle's rear bumper, suggesting it matched O'Keefe's injuries, while the defense highlighted the distances between the house and the lawn, arguing that the scene did not support the prosecution's narrative .​Following the site visit, testimony resumed in court with Canton firefighter and paramedic Jason Becker, who recounted Read's emotional state during her transport to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Becker described her as agitated yet cooperative, noting that she mentioned having an argument with O'Keefe prior to his death. Additionally, Dr. Garrey Faller, a former pathologist at Good Samaritan Medical Center, testified that Read's blood alcohol content was 0.093%—above the legal limit—approximately nine hours after the incident. The day concluded with Judge Beverly Cannone dismissing the jury early, marking the end of the first week of testimonyto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Paramedic testifies Karen Read admitted to argument with O'Keefe before death | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Organized crime groups in North Africa and Europe are increasingly using children as drug mules to transport illicit substances across borders. This disturbing trend involves several key aspects:Recruitment and Exploitation:Targeting Vulnerable Youth: Crime groups often recruit children from impoverished backgrounds or those with limited familial support.Coercion and Manipulation: Children may be coerced, manipulated, or lured with promises of money, safety, or a better future.Methods of Smuggling:Physical Concealment: Drugs are hidden on or inside the children's bodies, in their clothing, or in items they carry.Reduced Suspicion: Authorities may be less likely to suspect children of smuggling, making them attractive targets for traffickers.Routes and Networks:Transnational Operations: Children are used to move drugs between North Africa and Europe, exploiting porous borders and using various transportation methods, including boats, vehicles, and on foot.Complex Networks: Organized crime groups operate sophisticated networks that facilitate the movement of drugs and manage the logistics of using child mules.Risks and Consequences for Children:Legal and Physical Dangers: Children face significant risks, including arrest, imprisonment, and physical harm from handling dangerous substances.Psychological Trauma: The experience can lead to severe psychological trauma, impacting their mental health and future prospects.Law Enforcement Challenges:Detection and Prosecution: Identifying and prosecuting the adults responsible for exploiting children is challenging, as criminal organizations use various tactics to evade detection.Protection and Rehabilitation: Ensuring the safety and rehabilitation of child mules requires coordinated efforts between law enforcement, social services, and international organizations.International and National Responses:Policy and Legislation: Governments and international bodies are working to strengthen laws and policies to protect children and combat the exploitation by criminal groups.Awareness and Education: Efforts are being made to raise awareness about the issue and educate communities to prevent the recruitment of children by organized crime groups.(commercial at 8:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Feared drug cartels are using 'unlimited' supply of child migrants in Europe as foot soldiers to shift cocaine threaten them with rape and torture if they fail to sell enough, investigation finds | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this April 18, 2025 letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, federal prosecutors strongly oppose Sean Combs' request to adjourn his May 5 trial date, calling the defense's application “replete with mischaracterizations” and devoid of legal merit. The government accuses Combs of engaging in “gamesmanship” by shifting the justification for delay—from Speedy Trial Act concerns to alleged discovery issues and now to unresolved evidentiary matters involving Victim-4. Prosecutors argue that these evolving excuses are strategic ploys to derail the court's schedule and gain a tactical advantage. Emphasizing the lack of any credible or legally grounded basis for postponement, the government urges the court to deny any adjournment outright and keep the trial on track.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.244.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein's victims as required by the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein's high-powered legal team.The report also exposed the government's unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein's lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein's exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney's Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein's abuse to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein's victims as required by the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein's high-powered legal team.The report also exposed the government's unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein's lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein's exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney's Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein's abuse to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode we finish off the court filings with: The Second Amended Order Governing courthouse and courtroom conduct, the notice of hearing and the order changing the preliminary status hearing.(commercial at 7:17)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:010423 Second Amended Order Governing Courthouse and Courtroom Conduct.pdf (idaho.gov)010523 Notice of Hearing Criminal.pdf (idaho.gov)010623 Order Changing Time of Preliminary Status Hearing.pdf (idaho.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge has ordered both the prosecution and the defense to stay away from speaking with any potential jurors in the trial of Bryan Kohberger.   The order is curious though because it's usually a foregone conclusion that both sides should not be attempting to speak with potential jurors so the question is, what spurred this on?   Was Judge Judge just being extra cautious or is there something else cooking behind the scenes?Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 8:24)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger case: Idaho judge bans both sides from contacting prospective jurors | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the latest installment of the morning update, we get right back at it and check in on the headlines that we might have missed overnight and see where things currently stand as of this morning.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders update: Moscow police chief gives frustrating response to question about students' killer | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode we dive back into the court documents and this time we're taking a look at the superseded indictment of Bryan Kohberger and also the an updated version of the courtroom guidelines.(commercial at 7:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho Judicial Cases of InterestBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The world has been shaken by the devastating news that Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a courageous survivor who became a symbol of truth and resilience, has died. Virginia's life was defined by extraordinary bravery—first surviving the unimaginable horrors of trafficking at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein and his powerful network, and later daring to speak out when so many tried to silence her. Through years of public scrutiny, court battles, and personal pain, she carried herself with a grace and strength that inspired countless survivors around the world. Her voice helped expose some of the darkest abuses hidden behind the walls of wealth and influence, and her loss is a deeply painful blow to those who loved, admired, and fought alongside her.Virginia's death leaves behind a void that cannot be filled. She was more than a witness to unspeakable evil—she was a fighter who challenged a system built to protect it. Her legacy will endure in every survivor who finds the strength to speak, and in every person who refuses to look away from injustice because she taught us how. Today, we mourn not just the passing of a remarkable woman, but the stolen years of peace and healing she so profoundly deserved. May her memory be a blessing, and may her fight for truth and dignity never be forgotten. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The last days of Virginia Giuffre as Prince Andrew's accuser feared enemies 'were out to get her' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge issued an order denying Bryan Kohberger's motion to strike the death penalty on the grounds that he may have Autism Spectrum Disorder. Kohberger's defense team argued that his possible diagnosis made him categorically ineligible for the death penalty under constitutional protections. However, the judge ruled that Idaho law does not recognize autism as a categorical bar to capital punishment, unlike intellectual disability. He emphasized that while evidence of Kohberger's mental health status may be presented during the sentencing phase if he is convicted, it is not a basis to prevent the State from seeking the death penalty at this stage.The judge made clear that questions about Kohberger's mental health, including any evidence of autism, must be reserved for trial and possible sentencing proceedings—not pretrial motions. He stated that ruling otherwise would require him to make findings of fact not appropriate at this phase and reiterated that the law demands that a jury, not the court alone, determine any mitigating factors after conviction. Thus, Kohberger remains eligible for the death penalty as the case proceeds toward trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:042425+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Strike+Death+Penalty+RE+Autism+Spectrum+Disorder.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, Sean Combs opposes the government's motion seeking permission to withhold the identities of certain witnesses in the civil RICO case, arguing that such secrecy is unjustified and prejudicial. Combs' legal team contends that the government's vague claims of witness safety concerns lack any factual foundation or evidence of real threats from Combs or his legal team. They argue that the government's request to conceal witness identities, even during the early stages of discovery, violates basic principles of due process and fairness, as it would prevent Combs from meaningfully preparing his defense and testing the credibility of key accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.248.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, Sean Combs opposes the government's motion seeking permission to withhold the identities of certain witnesses in the civil RICO case, arguing that such secrecy is unjustified and prejudicial. Combs' legal team contends that the government's vague claims of witness safety concerns lack any factual foundation or evidence of real threats from Combs or his legal team. They argue that the government's request to conceal witness identities, even during the early stages of discovery, violates basic principles of due process and fairness, as it would prevent Combs from meaningfully preparing his defense and testing the credibility of key accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.248.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein's victims as required by the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein's high-powered legal team.The report also exposed the government's unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein's lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein's exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney's Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein's abuse to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report examining the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The report found serious missteps and poor judgment by federal prosecutors, particularly then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who ultimately approved the deal. The OIG concluded that while there was no evidence of criminal misconduct or corruption, prosecutors displayed a stunning lack of urgency, failed to properly notify Epstein's victims as required by the Crime Victims' Rights Act, and sidelined a 53-page federal indictment in favor of a lenient plea deal that shielded Epstein and his unnamed co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The report criticized the secretive nature of the NPA and found that Acosta gave “too much deference” to Epstein's high-powered legal team.The report also exposed the government's unusual willingness to cooperate with Epstein's lawyers, including allowing them to essentially dictate the terms of the deal, such as minimizing public exposure and avoiding victim input. Despite mounting evidence of Epstein's exploitation of dozens of underage girls, the U.S. Attorney's Office prioritized avoiding litigation risks and potential political fallout over pursuing justice. Although the OIG did not recommend criminal charges against any of the involved officials, the findings fueled renewed calls for accountability and transparency in cases involving wealthy, well-connected defendants. The report paints a picture of a justice system that buckled under pressure from power and influence, enabling Epstein's abuse to continue for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:dl (justice.gov)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 2-9-23In news that should not come as a shock to anyone, Ashley Guillard, the self proclaimed Tik Tok psychic/tarot card reader, missed a hearing in her case where she is being sued for defamation by University of Idaho Professor, Rebecca Scoefield.Scoefield was accused by Guillard without any evidence in multiple videos and even after receiving numerous cease and desist orders, she continued creating content. Now, since she didn't bother showing up for the hearing, a default judgement has been ruled in Rebecca Scoefields favor.(commercial at 7:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TikToker Who Falsely Accused Professor Of University Of Idaho Murders Faces Doomsday Judgement After Blowing Off Defamation Lawsuit (msn.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ashley Guillard, a tik tok content creator who claims to have psychic power and an inate spiritual ability that lets her solve crimes, has had all of her motions to dismiss the lawsuit against her denied by the Judge overseeing the case.In this episode we begin our look at that ruling.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.idd.51326.59.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this document, Sean Combs' legal team opposes the government's motion in limine that seeks to avoid disclosing the identities of certain witnesses in the criminal case against him. The defense argues that the government has not demonstrated any credible or individualized threat posed by Combs to justify withholding this information. They note that the government relies on generic assertions about witness safety without offering specific allegations of intimidation, coercion, or retaliation tied directly to Combs. The motion, they claim, lacks the evidentiary foundation required under legal precedent to support such an extreme restriction on the defendant's constitutional rights.Combs' attorneys also argue that shielding witness identities until just before trial would severely handicap the defense by preventing them from conducting thorough investigations, preparing cross-examinations, and assessing credibility—core components of a fair trial. They emphasize that protective measures, such as protective orders and redactions where necessary, already exist to mitigate genuine safety concerns without infringing on due process. Ultimately, the filing urges the court to deny the government's motion, framing it as an overreach that would tilt the trial unfairly in favor of the prosecution.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.266.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.As of April 2025, Kohberger's case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the early hours of November 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were brutally stabbed to death in a rental house near campus in Moscow, Idaho. The crime scene was particularly disturbing: there were no signs of forced entry, and two surviving roommates were left unharmed in the same house. The case immediately drew national attention due to the shocking nature of the murders and the lack of suspects in the early days. A months-long investigation led law enforcement to Bryan Christopher Kohberger, a 28-year-old Ph.D. criminology student at Washington State University, located about ten miles from the crime scene. Using cell phone data, surveillance footage, and a DNA match from a knife sheath found at the scene, police arrested Kohberger in Pennsylvania on December 30, 2022, and later extradited him to Idaho to face four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary.As of April 2025, Kohberger's case is still moving through the pretrial phase. His defense has pursued multiple motions challenging evidence collection, including arguments over cellphone pings, surveillance footage, and the genealogical tracing used to identify him as a suspect. The trial has faced delays due to defense requests for more time and the complexities of handling large volumes of digital and forensic evidence. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the calculated planning involved. Judge John Judge continues to rule on motions in limine, including what evidence will be allowed at trial. The case remains one of the most closely watched in the nation, with both legal teams preparing for what is expected to be a high-profile and emotionally charged trial, now tentatively slated to begin later in 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Leo "Tata" Sharp was an elderly World War II veteran and award-winning horticulturist who led a quiet life in Michigan—until it was revealed that he was one of the most prolific drug mules for Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel. In his late 80s, Sharp transported hundreds of kilograms of cocaine across the country in his Lincoln Town Car, using his age and unassuming appearance to avoid suspicion. He was recruited around 2009 by cartel associates and quickly proved useful, making regular cross-country drug runs between Arizona and Michigan, sometimes delivering up to 200 kilograms of cocaine at a time.His double life came crashing down in 2011 when he was pulled over in Michigan with over 100 kilograms of cocaine in his vehicle. During the stop, he tried to use his age as a shield, claiming he was lost and confused. Eventually, Sharp pleaded guilty in 2014 and was sentenced to three years in federal prison, a relatively light sentence given the scale of his crimes—largely due to his age, frail health, and status as a decorated veteran. The bizarre case captured national attention and inspired the 2018 Clint Eastwood film The Mule, loosely based on Sharp's story. He died in 2016, leaving behind a legacy as one of the most unlikely figures ever caught up in the cartel drug trade.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as his electronic accounts and devices. The defense argues that the government obtained these warrants by making false statements and omitting critical exculpatory evidence, thereby presenting a misleading portrayal of the facts to justify the searches. They contend that certain evidence, which suggested that participation in the alleged "Freak-Off" parties was voluntary and consensual, was intentionally excluded from the warrant applications. The defense asserts that this misconduct led to the issuance of overly broad warrants, allowing the seizure of extensive personal and digital records unrelated to the alleged offenses.Alternatively, the defense requests a Franks hearing to challenge the validity of the search warrants. A Franks hearing is warranted when a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement was knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in a warrant affidavit, and that the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause. The defense maintains that the government's alleged omissions and misrepresentations meet this standard, necessitating such a hearing. They emphasize that without the purportedly misleading information, the warrants would lack probable cause, rendering the seized evidence inadmissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:  gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.187.0.pdfshow lessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.