Podcasts about urmas

This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule. Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP's hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable. In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule. Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP's hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable. In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/east-asian-studies

This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule. Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP's hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable. In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule. Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP's hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable. In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/chinese-studies

This podcast episode is hosted by Toomas Hanso International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) who is talking to Urmas Hõbepappel. Urmas is an analyst at the University of Tartu Asia Centre and a researcher at the ICDS. His academic work deals with political psychology, collective identity, and history narratives in China, but this episode focuses on his upcoming article on the psychological function of coping in Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to legitimise its rule. Starting from the very general question of what the century of humiliation is, who are the main historical culprits in humiliating China, and to what extent is Russia different from other colonial powers, we delve into more specific aspects of humiliation as a psychological phenomenon. Hõbepappel explains why we must pay attention to the psychological aspect of coping to understand how humiliation legitimises CCP's hold on power - by reminding its people of past humiliation(s), the CCP effectively generates unease and anxiety among its populace that needs to be mitigated to have a normal life. The CCP has so far been able to administer just the right amount of poison (the national humiliation narrative) not to kill the patient and provided just the right amount of medicine (politically correct coping mechanisms) to keep its hold on power stable. In addition, as Hõbepappel argues, the psychology of humiliation in China is understudied and surrounded by several misconceptions. For example, in the study of Chinese nationalism, humiliation is often equated to other affective states like shame, anger, sense of inferiority and insecurity. While these emotions are indeed often associated with the nationalist sentiments in China, they are psychologically distinct and should also be analysed as such.

Ajakirjanikud Indrek Kiisler, Urmas Jaagant ja Madis Hindre kõnelevad koalitsioonilepingust, Rail Balticust, teisest pensionisambast, kultuuri- ja spordiehitistest ja Trumpi trallist.

"Äratundmine, et tiivad kannavad ja elu jookseb juba ammu oma lugu ilma, et see vajaks sinu enda vahetut kontakti, on väga-väga raske," räägib Urmas Vaino laste pesast lahkumisest. "Ilmselt ongi lapsevanema kõige suurem töö olla selleks hetkeks valmis ja osata käituda. Kindlasti on see seotud elukogemusega - kuidas oled sa iseseisvumise hetkedest läbi tulnud või välja saanud."

"Rahva teenrite" saates osalevad laupäeval ajakirjanikud Urmas Jaagant, Neeme Korv ja Urmet Kook. Juttu tuleb ajutiste maksude alaliseks muutumisest, eutanaasia debatist, lõdvalt antud tarbimislaenudest, miks Keskerakond oma endist juhti vaenab jpm.

Kui Tiiu Randviir värske koolilõpetajana rolli "Luikede järves" tegi, algas üks silmapaistvamaid tähelende, mida meie ballett näinud on. Saates "Käbi ei kuku..." meenutab Tiiu ka suurele lavale jõudmise eellugu, aga meie peamine tähelepanu kuulub inimestele ja sündmustele tema tantsukire ümber.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Urmas Jaagant ja Liisu Lass, kes räägivad valitsuse lagunemisest, Eesti majandusest ja Donald Trumpi töisest nädalast.

Ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Martin Šmutov ja Urmas Jaagant vaatasid otsa Putini ja Tumpi telefonikõnest alanud segadusele, rääkisid tulude deklareerimisest ja välisluure aastaraamatust.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Heidit Kaio ja Urmas Jaagant. Kõneldi sellest, et poliitikud on alustanud kaitsekulude ülepakkumismaratoni ning Telia nörritab kliente ja et tööandjad tahavad sotsiaalkulude kasvu piirata.

NB! Erandkorras on saade eetris laupäeval kell 10.05. Pärast seda teeb Vikerraadio otseülekande president Arnold Rüütli matusetseremoonialt.

Selle nädala raamat vaatleb Lääne revolutsioonide lainet ja selle kommunistlikku kulminatsiooni 20. sajandil. Võrdleva ajaloo laiahaardeline ja sügav käsitlus pakub sotsialismi kujunemise uut tõlgendust, tuues välja Vene revolutsiooni, Nõukogude režiimi esiletõusu ja Nõukogude Liidu lõpliku kokkuvarisemise tähenduse.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Krister Paris ja Urmas Jaagant.

Kas kolmesaja kuuekümne kaheksa karikatuuriga saab kümne aasta ajalugu kokku võtta? Jah ja ei. Selle nädala raamatusse on neid igatahes just nii palju kogutud. Rohkem ei mahtunud ja vähem ei saanud. Enamik kümne aasta poliitilisi tähtsündmusi on nende kaante vahel ära märgitud.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Urmas Jaagant ja Neeme Korv.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Urmas Jaagant ja Krister Paris.

Sel korral oli stuudios hinnatud ajakirjanik ning raadio- ja telesaatejuht Urmas Vaino. Uurisin, mis on toonud talle edu ja kuidas seda üldse määratleda? Kuidas on tal õnnestunud ühildada pereelu ja karjäär. Lisaks saad teada, kuidas on Urmas korraldanud oma isiklikud rahaasjad. Saatejuht: Mari-Liis Jääger

28. septembril 1994 läks Läänemerel vesisesse hauda parvlaev Estonia, viies endaga kaasa sadu inimesi. Toome tänases erisaates teieni mõned kõhedad lood ning muuhulgas paljastame 33 aastat lahendamata mõrva, mis toimus Estonia pardal siis, kui see veel Estonia nime ei kandnud. See saade oli esimest korda eetris 2020. aasta septembris.

Ajakirjanikud Indrek Kiisler, Urmas Jaagant ja Heidit Kaio arutlevad tuleva aasta riigieelarve üle, juttu tuleb ka lennuettevõte Nordica keerulisest olukorras ja nutiseadmete koolide keelamise ettepanekust.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Urmas Jaagant ja Martin Šmutov.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Urmet Kook, Urmas Jaagant ja Krister Paris.

Vikerraadio otsestuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Urmas Jaagant ja Neeme Korv.

Stuudios on ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Aivar Hundimägi ja Urmas Jaagant.

Ajakirjanikud Mirko Ojakivi, Sulev Vedler ja Urmas Jaagant uurisid, kui terav on kärpekirves ja kuidas töötab Venemaa varade konfiskeerimise seadus. Lisaks tehti juttu majanduse kehvast seisust.

"Rahva teenrid" kaardistavad laupäeval Euroopa Parlamendi valimiste seisu. Samuti võetakse luubi alla riigieelarve võimalikud kärped, välisministri osalemine Gruusia meeleavaldusel, eestikeelsele õppele ülemineku võimalik pidurdumine Tallinnas, eakad liikluses ja muud teemad. Saates osalevad Urmet Kook, Urmas Jaagant ja Neeme Korv.

Haapsalu linnapea Urmas Sukles räägib Haapsalu raadio kuulsusrikkast minevikust.

Sepp, kunstnik ja disainer Urmas Lüüs osaleb kunstifestivali "Ma ei saa aru" peanäitusel.

"Rahva teenrid" võtab luubi alla Bolti lobitöö, kaitsekulutuste tõstmise ettepaneku viiele protsendile ja riigi rahandusseisu, europarlamendi valimisnimekirjad jpm. Saates osalevad Urmas Jaagant, Martin Šmutov ja Urmet Kook.

Miks meie väheseid putukafotograafe, äsja Erik Kumari looduskaitsepreemia pälvinud bioloog, professor Urmas Tartes pole kunagi nõelastatud putukakogu teinud, vaid on neid oma isa eeskujul lapsest peale üksnes pildistanud? Sest see on üks tema põhimõtteid.