Settle in beside the Supreme Court bench. Explore ten recent cases that affect our daily lives. Hear ten weeks of pivotal arguments that have refined our nation's laws. Hosts and lawyers Mary Reichard and Jenny Rough break down the decisions to show us what they really mean. They'll consult with legal experts, educators, and those directly involved. They'll guide you through excerpts of the oral arguments. Peek behind the pillar at cases regarding employment and age discrimination, state funding for religious education, the insanity defense for murder, and other vital issues.
The Legal Docket podcast is an incredibly insightful and educational show that dives into the world of the Supreme Court and provides a comprehensive understanding of the cases being reviewed. As someone who doesn't have a legal background, I appreciate how the hosts approach the topics in a way that simplifies complex processes and issues. The podcast does an excellent job of breaking down legal terms and cases, making it accessible for listeners who may not be familiar with the subject matter. Additionally, I love that they strive to present both sides of the arguments and interview those affected by the cases, providing a well-rounded perspective.
One of the best aspects of this podcast is its ability to provide interesting insight into what is happening on the Supreme Court bench. The hosts cover a wide range of cases throughout each season and highlight some of the most important ones from different years. They not only discuss recent cases but also delve into historical background, giving listeners a comprehensive understanding of how these cases made it to the Supreme Court. Furthermore, they consistently provide instruction on the judicial process as it relates to the court, making it easier for listeners to follow along.
While there aren't many negatives about this podcast, one aspect that could be improved upon is their ability to speak with both sides represented in the arguments. Sometimes they are unsuccessful in reaching a particular party, which can create an imbalance in perspectives presented. However, despite this limitation, their efforts in representing both views are commendable.
In conclusion, The Legal Docket podcast is a must-listen for anyone interested in gaining honest and in-depth reporting on the Supreme Court. The hosts' ability to simplify complex legal matters while providing valuable insights makes this show not only educational but also entertaining. Whether you have a legal background or not, this podcast is definitely worth your time if you want to stay informed about one of our country's most important institutions.
weekdays
infrequent
every other week
infrequent
infrequent
infrequent
weekdays
infrequent
The Supreme Court considers questions of mitigating evidence and jury bias arising from the trial of one of the the Boston Marathon bombers.
The Supreme Court considers questions of mitigating evidence and jury bias arising from the trial of one of the the Boston Marathon bombers.
The federal government and two pain management physicians argue about the meaning of the text in the Controlled Substances Act.
The federal government and two pain management physicians argue about the meaning of the text in the Controlled Substances Act.
Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates battle it out at the Supreme Court over Mississippi's law that protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation.
Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates battle it out at the Supreme Court over Mississippi's law that protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation.
Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates battle it out at the Supreme Court over Mississippi's law that protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation.
A new Mississippi law protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation. The only abortion provider in the state sued, arguing the law is a direct affront to Supreme Court precedent.
A new Mississippi law protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation. The only abortion provider in the state sued, arguing the law is a direct affront to Supreme Court precedent.
A new Mississippi law protects unborn life after 15 weeks' gestation. The only abortion provider in the state sued, arguing the law is a direct affront to Supreme Court precedent.
Virginia Prodan worked as a lawyer in communist Romania under dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. He sent a man to assassinate her. Instead, Prodan witnessed Christ to him.
Virginia Prodan worked as a lawyer in communist Romania under dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. He sent a man to assassinate her. Instead, Prodan witnessed Christ to him.
Virginia Prodan worked as a lawyer in communist Romania under dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. He sent a man to assassinate her. Instead, Prodan witnessed Christ to him.
A famous courtroom artist tells the little-known aspects of his craft, beyond the colorful sketches that you can see.
A famous courtroom artist tells the little-known aspects of his craft, beyond the colorful sketches that you can see.
A famous courtroom artist tells the little-known aspects of his craft, beyond the colorful sketches that you can see.
A football coach sued his school district when the school prohibited him from offering a prayer on the field after games.
A football coach sued his school district when the school prohibited him from offering a prayer on the field after games.
A football coach sued his school district when the school prohibited him from offering a prayer on the field after games.
A man concerned for his own safety sought a license to carry a gun outside his home. But a New York judge said no to him while other judges said yes to others arguably less qualified.
A man concerned for his own safety sought a license to carry a gun outside his home. But a New York judge said no to him while other judges said yes to others arguably less qualified.
A man concerned for his own safety sought a license to carry a gun outside his home. But a New York judge said no to him while other judges said yes to others arguably less qualified.
A former Taco Bell employee sued her employer for unpaid wages. She wants to keep her battle in court, but the employer wants to force arbitration.
A former Taco Bell employee sued her employer for unpaid wages. She wants to keep her battle in court, but the employer wants to force arbitration.
A former Taco Bell employee sued her employer for unpaid wages. She wants to keep her battle in court, but the employer wants to force arbitration.
A man on death row wants his pastor with him in the execution chamber, but he had to sue the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to get it.
A man on death row wants his pastor with him in the execution chamber, but he had to sue the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to get it.
A man on death row wants his pastor with him in the execution chamber, but he had to sue the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to get it.
Abortion, guns, religion—our third season covers it all. Get personal with a Supreme Court artist. Understand how the latest decisions from our nation's highest court shape our immediate futures.
Abortion, guns, religion—our third season covers it all. Get personal with a Supreme Court artist. Understand how the latest decisions from our nation's highest court shape our immediate futures.
Abortion, guns, religion—our third season covers it all. Get personal with a Supreme Court artist. Understand how the latest decisions from our nation's highest court shape our immediate futures.
Patent law and administrative law intersect in this case that raises a question about the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Patent law and administrative law intersect in this case that raises a question about the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Patent law and administrative law intersect in this case that raises a question about the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The new 2021-2022 term of the US Supreme Court is upon us. Today, you'll hear previews of several cases the justices will decide this term. Those include decisions about abortion, free speech, unequal treatment of religious schools, second amendment rights, and more.
The new 2021-2022 term of the US Supreme Court is upon us. Today, you'll hear previews of several cases the justices will decide this term. Those include decisions about abortion, free speech, unequal treatment of religious schools, second amendment rights, and more.
The new 2021-2022 term of the US Supreme Court is upon us. Today, you'll hear previews of several cases the justices will decide this term. Those include decisions about abortion, free speech, unequal treatment of religious schools, second amendment rights, and more.
The new 2021-2022 term of the US Supreme Court is upon us. Today, you'll hear previews of several cases the justices will decide this term. Those include decisions about abortion, free speech, unequal treatment of religious schools, second amendment rights, and more.
When the attorney general of California sought confidential information about charitable donors, charities on the left and the right fought back.
When the attorney general of California sought confidential information about charitable donors, charities on the left and the right fought back.
When the attorney general of California sought confidential information about charitable donors, charities on the left and the right fought back.
Former child slaves on West African cocoa farms sue U.S. chocolate companies. The case examines whether the Alien Tort Statute covers those claims.
Former child slaves on West African cocoa farms sue U.S. chocolate companies. The case examines whether the Alien Tort Statute covers those claims.
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
