Podcasts about contracts

In episode #339 of SaaS Metrics School, Ben explains how change of control provisions in customer contracts can quietly derail due diligence, fundraising, or a future company exit. Drawing from real-world CFO experience and a recent webinar with a SaaS-focused tech attorney, Ben breaks down why seemingly standard legal language can introduce major risk into a SaaS company's recurring revenue profile. Ben highlights how buyers and investors scrutinize customer contracts during due diligence—and why poorly structured MSAs can threaten valuation, increase churn risk, or even kill a deal outright. What You'll Learn What a change of control provision is and why it matters How customer contracts are reviewed during SaaS due diligence Why change of control clauses can open the door to customer churn after an acquisition How procurement teams and customer legal teams typically push for these provisions When to push back, escalate, or seek alternative contract language Why contract structure is part of strong SaaS financial and operational readiness Why It Matters Customer contracts directly impact company valuation during an exit or fundraise Change of control provisions can trigger immediate churn risk post-acquisition Buyers want confidence in the durability of recurring revenue Poor legal hygiene can delay, discount, or kill a transaction Proactive contract review reduces future due diligence friction Strong back-office processes support long-term financial strategy and investor trust Resources Mentioned Webinar replay with Omid (tech attorney) on legal readiness for SaaS exits: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/pl/2148384654 SaaS Metrics course: https://www.thesaasacademy.com/the-saas-metrics-foundation

Who else outside the seven players in the Washington Post article need to be added? Nats future is officially here with a new GM No easy way to fix a double digit lose season

A shocking arrest, a record-breaking fraud scandal, and a system Americans are rapidly losing faith in. Tara breaks down how the Brown University shooter was also the MIT murderer, why authorities initially denied the connection, and how the truth emerged anyway. But that's just the beginning. The episode dives into what may be the largest theft from the federal government in U.S. history—potentially $18 BILLION funneled through Minnesota alone—along with evidence suggesting officials looked the other way. The result? A growing sense that taxpayers are being looted on an industrial scale.

12-18 The Athletic's Mike Silver speaks to teams that might be interested in Mac Jones next season & his take on why coaching contracts remain shrouded in secrecySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

12-18 The Athletic's Mike Silver speaks to teams that might be interested in Mac Jones next season & his take on why coaching contracts remain shrouded in secrecySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Cliche Larke went from educator to entrepreneur; scaling LC Business Services into a powerhouse that lands six-figure government contracts. In this Leadership Loading Podcast episode, she breaks down how AI can elevate small businesses if used the right way.Inside the episode:Why blindly using AI is killing small brandsHow Cliche used ChatGPT, Gemini, and Airtable to streamline workflowsWhat most entrepreneurs miss when bidding government contractsThe power of capability statements, process documentation, and mentorshipHow she blends PMP and Six Sigma methods for business success

Starting or scaling a business is exciting—but the legal side can feel overwhelming. In this episode of Women on Wealth, Julina Ogilvie sits down with Robyn Drucker, Transactional Attorney at Cohen and Wolf, to break down the legal foundations every woman entrepreneur needs.Robyn has helped countless business owners—from new founders to women inheriting businesses—navigate the decisions that protect their assets, reduce risk, and support long-term success. Together, we unpack the practical steps, overlooked pitfalls, and confidence-building strategies that can make or break your business.Episode Breakdown02:00 – The First Legal Steps When Starting a Business07:00 – Unique Challenges Women Entrepreneurs Face10:00 – Legal Considerations When Scaling14:50 – When (and How Often) to Check in With a Lawyer15:40 – The Biggest Legal Risks Entrepreneurs Face18:00 – Real-World Examples of Things Going Wrong20:00 – Contracts 101: What Must Be Included24:00 – Can You Use Online Templates or AI for Legal Documents?32:00 – Protecting Personal vs. Business Assets35:00 – Multiple Streams of Income: When Is It a “Real” Business?37:40 – Hiring Your First Employee40:50 – The Truth About Independent Contractors vs. EmployeeConnect with Julina Ogilvie:WebsiteYouTubeLinkedInEmail- jogilvie@principlewealthpartners.comConnect with Robyn Drucker:https://www.linkedin.com/in/robyn-drucker-77244147/The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. The statements and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the author. PWP cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data. For current PWP information, please visit the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov by searching with PWP's CRD #290180

Hosted by holistic business coach, Katy Stuart, The Soulful CEO podcast is your home for all things business strategy, deep spiritual work, and everything in between. This podcast features solo episodes packed with insight and value, as well as expert guest interviews with some of Katy's favorite names in the industry. The Soulful CEO is designed to empower and educate driven, soul-led women with real stories, honest truths, tried-and-true biz strategy, and everything you need to know to create a life and business better than your wildest dreams.In this guest episode, I am talking with the incredible Aubrianna Kay. A former client, absolute powerhouse and someone I admire greatly.  Aubrianna is a business and sales coach who blends energetics, identity work, and simple high level strategy to help women scale with soul. Her work centers on expanding a clients capacity to receive while building offers, systems, and leadership that hold $20K to $50K months.To access any of the links we mentioned in the show you can navigate using the links below:Aubrianna's insta hereAubrianna's free telegram community here Hope you love this episode as much as we loved recording it! 

After a lengthy discussion during a very lengthy meeting, the Montezuma-Cortez Re-1 school board voted Tuesday night to engage a law firm to review contracts for the district's new and departing superintendents. And GOCO, or Great Outdoors Colorado, has awarded $2.6 million to projects in Southwest Colorado.

Discussing how the relationships in our lives are either preplanned contracts and contracts made on the fly as unexpected opportunities come into being. Knowing which is which and what the intention was/is can help us understand and navigate them.

Is Jerry Jones going to stop extending certain players to big contracts? full 799 Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:45:17 +0000 TObfUX6VCyhPruiVwf9BUKFL49PuxP2u nfl,dallas cowboys,sports Shan and RJ nfl,dallas cowboys,sports Is Jerry Jones going to stop extending certain players to big contracts? DFW sports fans, this one's for you. The Shan & RJ show brings the heat with honest takes, sharp insight, and plenty of laughs covering the Cowboys, Mavericks, Rangers, Stars, and everything Texas sports. Hosted by longtime local favorites Shan Shariff and RJ Choppy, along with insider Bobby Belt, the show blends deep knowledge with real fan vibes — plus regular guests like Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, Head Coach Brian Schottenheimer and former players who keep the conversation fresh and real. New episodes drop Monday-Friday, or you can listen to Shan & RJ live on 105.3 The Fan, weekdays from 6–10 a.m. CT. © 2025 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https://player.amper

Last spring, California voters narrowly passed Proposition 1 to reform behavioral health care across the state.It calls for a $6.4 billion bond to fund behavioral health beds and housing, and hands more money to the state to focus on treating serious mental illnesses and addiction.Now, county officials say they've been forced to cancel 21 contracts with agencies that provide preventative services.We talk about what this means for behavioral health services and community members in San Diego County.Guest:Lisa Halverstadt, senior investigative reporter, Voice of San Diego

In “Sean Combs: The Reckoning Pt 3 — Closing Remarks”, Ern & Iso wrap up the entire Diddy discussion with their final thoughts and a bigger convo about accountability, “trickle-down” success, and why public opinion flips depending on who's on the hot seat.They break down why it feels like everybody wants one person to carry the whole blame, even though whole teams, execs, and insiders benefited when things were good. They also talk about the jury outrage, the Cassie situation, and why people often prefer the more entertaining lie over the truth. From there, the conversation expands into the ugly realities of the music business: bad contracts, 360 deals, “opportunity” vs fair pay, and why artists keep signing anyway.They close with a real message: fame can make people accept deals and compromises they'll regret later, and in the end—knowledge, lawyers, and accountability matter.Tap in, and let us know in the comments: is the culture being consistent… or just picking sides?Support the show: Like

Exodus May Rock, Ubisoft expands, and hardware contracts The best gaming Podcast 561substack https://substack.com/@acgreviehttps://amzn.to/43LY1Gv Amazon Affiliate LinkJoin this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5zKbGokI0oI6SeZrHTfJjA/join Each Friday ACG and some pals Silver, Rej, Abssi, and Jonny from https://www.twitch.tv/jonnyplayslive get together to discuss games, life, books, movies and everything else. New home of the ACG Best Gaming Podcast Follow me on Twitter for reviews and info @jeremypenter-JOIN the ACG Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/ACGVids/ https://www.patreon.com/AngryCentaurGaming

In this episode of Gov Tech Today, hosts Russell Lowery and Jennifer Saha discuss the recent updates to terms and conditions for IT contracts released by the California Department of Technology (CDT) and the Department of General Services (DGS). The new regulations aim to simplify the contracting process by consolidating three sets of cloud provisions into one and introducing a cap on vendor liability for cybersecurity breaches. The episode delves into the significance of these changes for both vendors and state agencies, highlighting the collaborative efforts between CDT and DGS to address long-standing concerns from the vendor community. 00:00 Introduction to Gov Tech Today00:36 New Terms and Conditions Released by CDT04:04 Simplification of IT Contracts06:45 Collaboration Between CDT and DGS11:05 Impact on Vendors and Subcontractors13:20 Final Thoughts and Practical Advice

In this fiery episode of the Talk My Credo Podcast, the conversation shifts into a discussion about Chris Paul, his playing style, and the implications of his recent release from the Los Angeles Clippers while delving into the complexities of basketball skills, particularly focusing on Chris Paul's impact on the game and the injuries that have shaped his career. It also touches on the choices of Carmelo Anthony, the "banana boat crew" and perspectives that pitted Donte against Nas on Chris Paul's legacy. Next, the TMC crew gets into a passionate debate on 50 Cent's P Diddy focused documentary "The Reckoning", and the intricate relationship between the two. Exploring themes of loyalty, friendship, and the perception of 'corniness' in the industry, the discussion highlights the power dynamics within the music industry and the ongoing rivalries that resembles "Game of Thrones", emphasizing the role of money and public perception in shaping these narratives. You dont want to miss this one! Tap in and lets get active!!*** CHAPTERS ***00:00 Navigating the Music Scene02:57 Challenges in the Christian Music Community05:52 The Struggle for Authenticity08:32 The Impact of Contracts and Management11:21 Reflections on Personal Growth and Change14:23 Game Highlights and School Achievements17:11 Scholarship Opportunities and HBCUs19:51 High School Rivalries and Rankings22:43 Experiences in Different States25:33 Podcast Introduction and Current Events31:19 Height and Identity34:42 Chris Paul's Legacy and Controversies46:26 The Impact of Chris Paul on the NBA55:39 The Evolution of NBA Superstars59:41 The Impact of Injuries on Player Careers01:01:23 Diddy and 50 Cent: A Complicated Relationship01:14:24 The Nature of Rivalries in the Entertainment Industry01:24:39 Navigating the Entertainment Industry's Pitfalls01:27:53 The Power Dynamics in Hip-Hop01:31:41 The Perception of 50 Cent01:38:05 The Cold War Between Diddy and 50 Cent01:43:09 The Impact of Public Perception01:48:08 Looking Ahead: Future Conversations---------------

Mark Longo, Uncle Mike Tosaw (St. Charles Wealth Management), and Andrew 'The Rock Lobster' Giovinazzi (The Option Pit) break down the final full trading week of 2025. This high-stakes episode covers the shocking conclusion to the '80s Trivia Challenge, explosive VIX and index flow, and a crucial year-end Tax Strategy discussion. The '80s Trivia Challenge: A Consequential Loss The dramatic conclusion of the year-long contest: Uncle Mike vs. The Rock Lobster. The hosts sweat it out in a high-pressure round of Sports & Leisure trivia. Find out who claims the point and if the "Chicago Politics" conspiracy theories hold up! The Trading Block: End-of-Year Market Breakdown The VIX Cash index is rallying off recent lows. Is this December different from years past? The Rock Lobster confesses his VIX Puts strategy was his "worst product" of the year due to being a "Greedy Pig" and not monetizing the downside swings. The panel also looks at key single-name movers like Apple (AAPL), Broadcom (AVGO), and a roaring Tesla (TSLA). Hot Options Report: VIX Puts & SPY Zero Day Flow Detailed analysis of today's hottest option: The dirt-cheap Dec 15th VIX Puts for $0.04. Plus, a look at the massive flow in SPY (SPY) and SPX (SPX) index options, confirming the zero-day trend, alongside surprising upside action in the QQQ (QQQ) Calls. Strategy Block: Crucial Year-End Tax Planning Uncle Mike provides essential guidance on year-end tax strategies. He details how to use Tax Loss Harvesting to offset gains and reminds traders about the Wash Sale rules. A must-listen segment covers the Mark-to-Market rule for 1256 Contracts (like SPX options) before the December 31st deadline. Around the Block: Silver (SLV) Poll & All-Time Highs The team forecasts whether Silver (SLV) can continue its historic run into 2026. Plus, predictions on if the SPX can hit new All-Time Highs before the new year.

Mark Longo, Uncle Mike Tosaw (St. Charles Wealth Management), and Andrew 'The Rock Lobster' Giovinazzi (The Option Pit) break down the final full trading week of 2025. This high-stakes episode covers the shocking conclusion to the '80s Trivia Challenge, explosive VIX and index flow, and a crucial year-end Tax Strategy discussion. The '80s Trivia Challenge: A Consequential Loss The dramatic conclusion of the year-long contest: Uncle Mike vs. The Rock Lobster. The hosts sweat it out in a high-pressure round of Sports & Leisure trivia. Find out who claims the point and if the "Chicago Politics" conspiracy theories hold up! The Trading Block: End-of-Year Market Breakdown The VIX Cash index is rallying off recent lows. Is this December different from years past? The Rock Lobster confesses his VIX Puts strategy was his "worst product" of the year due to being a "Greedy Pig" and not monetizing the downside swings. The panel also looks at key single-name movers like Apple (AAPL), Broadcom (AVGO), and a roaring Tesla (TSLA). Hot Options Report: VIX Puts & SPY Zero Day Flow Detailed analysis of today's hottest option: The dirt-cheap Dec 15th VIX Puts for $0.04. Plus, a look at the massive flow in SPY (SPY) and SPX (SPX) index options, confirming the zero-day trend, alongside surprising upside action in the QQQ (QQQ) Calls. Strategy Block: Crucial Year-End Tax Planning Uncle Mike provides essential guidance on year-end tax strategies. He details how to use Tax Loss Harvesting to offset gains and reminds traders about the Wash Sale rules. A must-listen segment covers the Mark-to-Market rule for 1256 Contracts (like SPX options) before the December 31st deadline. Around the Block: Silver (SLV) Poll & All-Time Highs The team forecasts whether Silver (SLV) can continue its historic run into 2026. Plus, predictions on if the SPX can hit new All-Time Highs before the new year.

In Season 3, Navigating Major Programmes expanded the podcast's primary goal—to go beyond the tools and frameworks of program delivery into the humanity behind it—with amazing results. In this wrap-up episode, Riccardo reviews the past year, celebrating the panelists, guests, and listeners who make the show possible. He highlights salient points from Uncharted Conversations and Master Builders, points that truly capture the breadth and depth these collaborators have achieved, both behind the mic and every day in their roles as leaders and innovators.With nearly twice as many episodes and double the weekly listeners from Season 2, the 2025 season gave Riccardo and his co-hosts and guests so many opportunities to explore both the big picture thinking and practical applications that are shaping—and shaking up—the industry today. In January 2026, Navigating Major Programmes will return for season 4 with even more inspiring stories, game-changing ideas, and disruptive conversations about the future of program management.Disclaimer: Navigating Major Programmes believes in adapting with technological advances. This episode was narrated by an AI-generated voice of the program host.Key Takeaways:What this season taught the hosts about what you—the listener—want to hear;Riccardo's favourite episodes, to listen back on during the break;What to expect in season 4, including a brand new series. Quote:“The future of this industry will be built by those who lead with humanity.” - Riccardo CosentinoThe conversation doesn't stop here—connect and converse with our community via LinkedIn:Listen to Episode 4, The Human Side of Major Projects with Melissa Di Marco: https://navigating-major-programmes-2a01b27b.simplecast.com/episodes/the-human-side-of-major-projects-with-melissa-di-marco-master-builders-s3-ep4Listen to Episode 10, The Powerful Impact of Specialization and Dedication on Long-Haul Projects with Wendy Itagawa: https://navigating-major-programmes-2a01b27b.simplecast.com/episodes/the-powerful-impact-of-specialization-and-dedication-on-long-haul-projects-with-wendy-itagawaListen to Episode 16, Public–Private Partnerships Part 2: Contracts, Contractors, and True Collaboration: https://navigating-major-programmes-2a01b27b.simplecast.com/episodes/publicprivate-partnerships-part-2-contracts-contractors-and-true-collaborationFollow Navigating Major Programmes: https://www.linkedin.com/company/navigating-major-programmes/Follow Riccardo Cosentino on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cosentinoriccardo/Read Riccardo's latest at: https://riccardocosentino.com/ Music: "A New Tomorrow" by Chordial Music. Licensed through PremiumBeat.

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding UCC Article 2 vs. Common Law Contracts: A Legal Deep DiveThis conversation provides an in-depth analysis of UCC Article 2, focusing on the transition from common law contracts to the more flexible UCC framework. It covers essential topics such as the scope of UCC Article 2, merchant status, contract formation, the battle of the forms, performance and breach, risk of loss, warranties, remedies, and the judicial concept of unconscionability. The discussion emphasizes the UCC's anti-surprise policy, which aims to protect buyers from hidden risks and unfair terms in contracts.Navigating the transition from common law contracts to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 2 can feel like stepping into a new world. The shift from rigid common law rules to the flexible, commerce-friendly UCC is akin to changing the rules of gravity in a legal landscape.The Philosophical Shift: Common law contracts focus on the intent and promises between two parties, demanding precision and formality. In contrast, UCC Article 2, which governs the sale of goods, is designed for the high-volume, often messy reality of commerce. It aims to facilitate trade rather than hinder it over minor discrepancies.Scope and Application: The UCC applies exclusively to transactions involving goods, defined as movable items at the time of contract identification. This distinction is crucial, as it determines whether the UCC or common law governs a transaction. In mixed contracts involving both goods and services, the predominant purpose test helps decide the applicable legal regime.Merchant Status and Good Faith: Merchant status under the UCC introduces stricter rules and increased liability. Merchants are held to a higher standard of good faith, requiring not only honesty but also adherence to reasonable commercial standards. This ensures that a merchant's conduct aligns with industry norms.Formation and Flexibility: UCC formation rules prioritize the parties' intent to contract, even if some terms are left open. The code provides statutory gap fillers to address these omissions, ensuring that viable agreements are not destroyed by technicalities.Warranties and Disclaimers: The UCC imposes express and implied warranties to ensure product quality. Sellers can disclaim these warranties, but the UCC's anti-surprise policy requires disclaimers to be conspicuous and explicit. This protects buyers from hidden risks.Remedies and Risk of Loss: The UCC offers remedies to place aggrieved parties in the position they would have occupied had the contract been fully performed. It also outlines rules for risk of loss, determining which party bears the financial burden if goods are damaged or destroyed.The UCC's overarching policy objective is to prevent surprise and ensure fairness in commercial transactions. By understanding the nuances of UCC Article 2 and its contrast with common law, legal professionals can navigate this complex landscape with confidence.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest legal insights and deepen your understanding of contract law.TakeawaysThe transition from common law to UCC is significant.UCC Article 2 focuses on commercial reality and flexibility.Merchant status affects the obligations and risks in transactions.The predominant purpose test determines the governing law for mixed contracts.UCC formation rules are more flexible than common law.The battle of the forms allows for contract formation despite discrepancies.The perfect tender rule gives buyers leverage but has safety valves.Risk of loss depends on the type of contract and seller status.Warranties are foundational seller promises that can be difficult to disclaim.Unconscionability serves as a judicial check on fairness in contracts.UCC, Article 2, contracts, common law, merchant status, warranties, remedies, unconscionability, risk of loss, battle of the forms

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding Third Party Rights: A Comprehensive Guide for Law StudentsThis conversation delves into the complexities of third-party rights in contract law, focusing on beneficiaries, assignments, and delegations. It provides a structured five-step framework to analyze these issues, emphasizing the importance of understanding the roles of various parties, the concept of vesting, and the implications of defenses and priority conflicts. The discussion also highlights the differences between common law and UCC rules regarding assignments and delegations, ultimately equipping listeners with the tools needed to navigate these intricate legal concepts effectively.In the intricate world of contract law, third party rights often present a complex challenge for students preparing for exams. This blog post delves into the nuances of third party rights, offering a roadmap to navigate these tricky waters.The Three-Dimensional Contract WorldContracts are not just agreements between two parties; they often extend obligations and rights beyond the original signatories. This concept is crucial for law students, especially when preparing for exams. Understanding third party rights is essential, as these issues frequently appear disguised within other legal scenarios.The Framework: Five Steps to MasteryIdentify the Role: Determine if the third party is a beneficiary, assignee, or delegatee. This identification is crucial as it sets the stage for further analysis.Validity and Vesting: Assess whether the third party's rights have become permanent. Timing is key here, as it dictates the enforceability of these rights.Rights and Defenses: Analyze what claims can be brought against the third party and who they can sue. This step involves understanding the legal standing and potential defenses.Modifications and Novation: Consider if the original parties have altered the contract before the third party's rights became final. This can significantly impact the third party's legal standing.Breach and Remedies: Finally, evaluate what happens when the contract falls apart. Understanding who is liable and the available remedies is crucial for a comprehensive analysis.Historical Context and Modern ImplicationsThe doctrine of privity of contract historically limited legal actions to the original parties. However, landmark cases like Lawrence V. Fox have expanded these rights, allowing intended beneficiaries to enforce contracts. This evolution reflects the law's adaptation to ensure fairness and prevent unjust enrichment.Mastering the ExamBy following this structured approach, law students can confidently tackle even the most complex exam questions on third party rights. Remember, contracts are dynamic, and understanding their full lifecycle is key to mastering this area of law.Subscribe NowStay updated with more insights and tips on mastering contract law by subscribing to our newsletter.TakeawaysThird party rights are essential in contract law.Understanding the roles of beneficiaries is crucial.Vesting of rights locks in a beneficiary's claims.Defenses can be raised against third party claims.Assignment transfers rights, while delegation transfers duties.Priority conflicts can complicate assignments.Novation requires consent from all parties involved.UCC rules provide specific guidelines for assignments.A structured framework helps analyze complex scenarios.Mastering these principles is key for legal exams.contracts, third party rights, beneficiaries, assignment, delegation, novation, UCC, legal obligations, standing, contract law

Host Bill Radke discusses the week’s news with Longtime local political consultant Cathy Allen, Seattle Channel host/producer, co-host of Seattle News, Views, and Brews podcast Brian Callanan, and King County GOP Chair Jolie Lansdowne.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of The Metrics Brothers, Ray “Growth” Rike and Dave “CAC” Kellogg take on one of the biggest challenges facing modern SaaS and AI-Native companies: how to measure NRR and expansion when pricing isn't fixed anymore.With the rise of usage-based, user-based-but-variable, and outcome-based pricing, the traditional world of ARR - long the backbone of SaaS metrics has been turned on its head. Contracts no longer tell the story. Spend does.Dave breaks down how to rethink ARR proxies using quarterly or monthly revenue (“implied ARR”) and why longer intervals help smooth volatility, especially for “humpback” or highly seasonal customers whose spend fluctuates dramatically month-to-month.Ray digs into what NRR was originally designed to measure and why many teams misinterpret it—especially in variable-pricing environments where a backward-looking metric can't serve as a forward-looking forecast. The brothers explain why sequential expansion, usage behavior, and real spend patterns now matter far more than traditional ARR bridges.Key topics include:Why ARR no longer maps cleanly to revenue in a variable pricing worldHow to calculate implied ARR using quarterly or monthly software revenueWhy NRR must be interpreted differently—and why survivor bias still mattersHow volatility and seasonality distort short-interval metricsWhy usage is the real leading indicator, not invoicesHow to rethink “expansion ARR” when base + variable spend changes continuouslyPacked with examples, including sinusoidal customers, misleading GRR math, and the dangers of splitting base versus variable revenue, this episode gives operators and investors a practical framework for measuring customer growth when pricing is anything but predictable.A must-listen for CFOs, RevOps leaders, and anyone trying to modernize SaaS metrics for the AI era.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

UK GDP data for October disappoints coming in at -0.1 per cent month on month with services output falling by 0.3 per cent. Oracle shares tumble to their lowest level since January as investors show their concern over the company's A.I.-related splurge but global markets reached new record highs during yesterday's session with the S&P 500 breaking through the 6,900-point mark for the first time. Disney and Open A.I. join forces in a $1bn deal with the entertainment giant licensing its characters to feature in the Sora video creation app.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding Contract Law Remedies: Expectation, Reliance, and RestitutionThis conversation delves into the intricacies of contract remedies, focusing on the primary types: expectation, reliance, and restitution. It emphasizes the importance of compensation over punishment in contract law, exploring the limitations on damages, special rules under the UCC, and the concept of equitable remedies. The discussion provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how damages are calculated and the legal principles that govern them, making it essential for law students preparing for exams.In the realm of contract law, understanding remedies is crucial for both students and practitioners. The primary goal of contract remedies is compensation, not punishment, aiming to place the non-breaching party in the position they would have been if the contract had been performed as promised. Let's delve into the three main types of remedies: expectation, reliance, and restitution.Expectation Damages: The Default RemedyExpectation damages are the most common remedy, designed to give the injured party the benefit of the bargain. This involves calculating the value of what was promised minus what was actually received, adding any incidental or consequential losses, and subtracting any costs avoided due to the breach. This forward-looking approach ensures the injured party receives the future they were promised.Reliance Damages: Looking BackwardWhen expectation damages are too speculative, reliance damages come into play. This remedy aims to restore the injured party to their pre-contract position by reimbursing expenses incurred in reliance on the contract. It's particularly useful in cases where future profits are uncertain, such as new business ventures.Restitution: Preventing Unjust EnrichmentRestitution shifts the focus from the injured party's loss to the breaching party's gain. This remedy ensures that the breaching party does not unfairly benefit from the contract. It's especially relevant in scenarios where the market value of the work done exceeds the contract price, allowing the non-breaching party to recover the reasonable value of their services.Key Limitations and ConsiderationsContract law also imposes limitations on these remedies, including foreseeability, certainty, and the duty to mitigate damages. These constraints ensure that damages are reasonable and justifiable. Additionally, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides specific rules for the sale of goods, emphasizing real-world mitigation strategies.In conclusion, understanding these remedies and their limitations is essential for navigating contract law effectively. Whether you're preparing for an exam or dealing with a real-world contract dispute, mastering these concepts will equip you with the tools needed to achieve fair compensation.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in contract law.TakeawaysThe goal of contract remedies is compensation, not punishment.Expectation damages aim to put the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed.Reliance damages restore the status quo ante, reimbursing expenses incurred in reliance on the contract.Restitution focuses on preventing unjust enrichment of the breaching party.Damages must be proven with reasonable certainty; speculation is not enough.The injured party has a duty to mitigate their losses after a breach.The Lost Volume Seller doctrine allows sellers to recover lost profits even after reselling goods.Specific performance is an equitable remedy used when money damages are inadequate.Liquidated damages clauses must be reasonable estimates of potential losses, not penalties.contract law, remedies, expectation damages, reliance damages, restitution, UCC, equitable remedies, legal principles, compensation, breach of contract

In today's episode, Eric sits down with Venus Quates, President & CEO of LaunchTech, to unpack the real truth about certifications—how they open doors, how they fail you when you rely on them alone, and why hunger and capability win long-term. Venus shares how she landed her very first state contract by responding overnight, expanded the work, underpriced herself, lost money, and still used the opportunity as a launchpad to scale. She also breaks down why certs don't equal contracts, the danger of relying on 8(a)/SDVOSB status without capability, and how partnerships, pricing strategy, and operational readiness matter far more than a badge on paper. Key Takeaways Certifications open the door — capability, hunger & execution keep you inside. Underpricing kills margins — learn pricing, back-office operations & contract math early. 8(a) ≠ automatic revenue; partnerships & performance create real opportunity. Learn more: https://federalhelpcenter.com/ https://govcongiants.org/  Join the bootcamp: https://govcongiants.org/bootcamp  Watch the full Youtube Episode here: https://youtu.be/wlLfhx0XbuM 

Greg Coleman's career took a turn that almost no one expects. After helping build a venture-backed tech company and appearing on Shark Tank, he shifted into a world most founders overlook: government contracting. In this conversation, Greg explains how startups, consultants, and small businesses can position themselves to work with federal agencies, navigate complex programs like SBIR and OTAs, and understand what it actually takes to break into the government market.Greg spent years inside the Department of Defense innovation ecosystem, where he evaluated early-stage technologies, managed prototype programs, and worked directly with founders trying to sell to the government. Today he advises companies on how to approach the federal market, avoid common mistakes, and build real opportunities inside agencies.If you're exploring government contracting for the first time, wondering how companies get funding, or trying to understand what separates successful federal vendors from everyone else, this interview gives you a clear, realistic starting point.Chapters00:00 – Greg's background and early Air Force career02:15 – Flying high-level government officials and global missions04:05 – Launching a startup and appearing on Shark Tank07:10 – Entering the government innovation ecosystem (DIU, NSIN)13:45 – How SBIR and STTR really work for small businesses18:20 – OTAs and how companies move from prototype to production25:10 – Examples of emerging tech companies building for the government31:20 – The hardest challenge: crossing the “valley of death”35:00 – Greg's advisory work helping companies approach the federal market38:30 – Greg's thoughts on the GovClose Certification ProgramWork With GregGreg advises early-stage and growth-stage companies (Pre-Seed through Series B) on entering the federal market, building repeatable sales strategies, and navigating SBIR, OTA, and prototype pathways.Connect: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregorycoleman/Become a Certified Government Contracting ProfessionalLearn federal sales, pipeline building, and modern acquisition strategies inside the GovClose Certification Program:https://govclose.comHire a GovClose-Trained ConsultantCompanies can get matched with trained federal sales consultants here:https://match.govclose.com

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 479. Libertarian Nicholas Sinard asked me to field some questions about the referenced issues, so we did so. (Recorded Dec. 10, 2025.) https://youtu.be/DlbDlmuUPW0 Regarding our discussion of my previous comments about the definition of rights, and what rights are justified. As a definitional matter, a legal right is a legally enforceable claim to the exclusive use of a resource. As to what rights libertarians think are justified, I have discussed the idea that the only rights that are legitimate or just are those that the assertion of which cannot be coherently criticized. The reason is rooted in the logic of argumentation ethics and my estoppel defense of rights, e.g. society may justly punish those who have initiated force, in a manner proportionate to their initiation of force and to the consequences thereof, because they cannot coherently object to such punishment") Stephan Kinsella, "A Libertarian Theory of Punishment and Rights," in Legal Foundations of a Free Society (Houston, Texas: Papinian Press, 2023). See also chapters 6. Dialogical Arguments for Libertarian Rights, 7. Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan, and 22. The Undeniable Morality of Capitalism, et pass.; and other writing such as KOL451 | Debating the Nature of Rights on The Rational Egoist (Michael Liebowitz) (from the transcript): [12:25–19:47] I think when people say that I have a right to X what they're really saying is if "I were to use force to defend my claim to this space" I can't be coherently criticized. In other words, my proposed use of force to defend this space, is just, is justified. Which is why it ties into what laws are justified. Because a law is just a social recognition, by your society—your local neighbors, the legal system—that they recognize your claim, and they're willing to endorse or support your use of force to defend yourself. So ultimately when we say there's a right, what we're saying is that if the legal system uses force to defend your claimed right, that use of force itself is justified. So this is a complicated way of saying what libertarians often say,  something like: it's either ballots or bullets. It always comes down to physical force in the end. So when you have a law, what you're saying is that the legal principle that we're that proposing—like defending my house, or my body from rape or murder—we're saying that if you were to use force to defend yourself, or if the legal system would do so in your name, then that would not be unjustified. And I think that's ultimately the claim. So what you're saying is ... the reason I call it a metanorm (( Rights as Metanorms; Rights and Morals as Intersecting Sets Not as Subset of Morals. )) is because ... Well, I distinguish between morality, and the justice of the legal system. So for example—and I think maybe Rand might agree with me on this, I'm not sure (( See, e.g, these tweets by Objectivist Michael Liebowitz, admitting that in some cases it might not only be moral to violate a right but immoral not to: 1, 2 ("Suppose a guy is driving with his son, and someone shoots up his car, badly wounding the son and taking out the tires. There is no one around, and he needs to get his son to a hospital. He sees an unattended parked car and steals it, getting his son the help he needs. That would be both virtuous and a crime."), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ("The person who wouldn't steal a dollar to prevent his children from being tortured is the person who should face harsh moral judgment."), 8.  ))—but a simplistic view of morality, which most libertarians might have—and I don't mean to be critical by saying simplistic, because it's an attempt to distinguish between...  so most people would say that "you shouldn't do drugs" and therefore they're not opposed to a law outlawing drugs, because to their simplistic linear mind, if it's immoral, it should be made illegal. But if you have a kind of a more nuanced view of things, you understand that, well just because something is immoral, doesn't mean it should be illegal. That's the libertarian view—its like, okay, doing drugs, being a  drug addict might be immoral, it might be harmful to your life, but you're not violating someone's rights. So the government [the state] is not justified in outlawing it. So that's like a second level. So when you explain that to your normy person, then you might say, well that's because morality, or that's because rights violations are a subset of morality. So that's kind of a first approximation about how you explain to people why everything that's not that's immoral should not be illegal. It's because a rights violation should be illegal, but that's only a subset of immorality. But when you put it that way, the assumption is that every rights violation is immoral although not everything that's immoral is a rights violation right. And my personal view that I've I've come to adopt over the years is that's that's actually slightly incorrect. In other words it it's incorrect to say that everything that's a rights violation is necessarily immoral. And the reason is because I view rights as a metanorm. This is the view as a human being, living in society, who wants to have a moral view of matters and the way human Society should operate, what law would I favor as a justified law? So I would say that we should have a law that says you can't steal from people. But what that means is that it's justified if the legal system uses force to stop crime, or to stop theft. It's justified. Which which means that if someone is caught being a thief or a rapist or a murderer and they're punished or dealt with in a certain way, that response by the legal system, or by the victim using the legal system as its proxy—you can't criticize that itself an immoral action; it's justified. So to my mind the ultimate purpose of law, and to think about this, is to think about what's justified. But it doesn't mean it doesn't mean that every rights violation is necessarily immoral. And again, it's because when you classify the legal system's response to a crime as justified, what you're saying is, it doesn't violate the aggressor's rights if force is used against him. But it doesn't necessarily imply that what he did was immoral. So this is why my view is that we have to view rights violations not as a proper subset of immorality, but as its own set which is mostly overlapping with immorality. So I would say that 99% of all rights violations are actually immoral, just like I would say that it's immoral to be a dishonest person in general but I don't think that it's logically necessarily true. And the reason is because the purpose of morality is to guide man's conduct in his everyday affairs, but the purpose of political ethics is to tell us which legal system is justified. So that morm is aimed at determining which laws are just; it's not aimed at telling us how we should act on a day-to-day basis. So given a legal system,  which I think is a just legal system—let's say we have a legal system where which outlaws murder and theft and extortion and rape and robbery and all this kind of stuff—that doesn't necessarily mean that I am always immoral if I choose to violate someone's rights in that system. It probably is in most cases,  but I'm not sure it's logically the same thing. [Then the example of someone in the woods breaking into a cabin to save their baby's life.] Shownotes (Grok) Show Notes: Stephan Kinsella & Nicholas Sinard on Co-Ownership, Property Rights, and Related Issues (Full conversation – Parts 1 & 2 combined) Opening Summary and Defense of Co-Ownership (0:00–4:41) Kinsella summarizes his long-standing view: co-ownership of scarce resources is unproblematic and historically unquestioned. Property rights exist to avoid interpersonal conflict over rivalrous (scarce) resources; contracts can split the “bundle of rights” in ways that still prevent conflict. Examples: state-owned property is actually co-owned by taxpayers/victims; homesteading-by-proxy creates temporary co-ownership; wills can be structured to achieve the same result even if death technically ends the testator's existence. Hoppe, Easements, and Collective Homesteading (4:41–8:22) Sinard: critics are taking Hoppe too literally when he says “only one owner per resource.” Hoppe himself recognizes easements, servitudes, and even collective homesteading (e.g., a commonly used village path). Practical co-ownership (spouses, roommates, joint heirs) already works via contracts and arbitration/divorce/sale when conflict arises. Meta-Norms and the Duty to Avoid Conflict (8:22–9:53) Even when no perfect rule exists, parties still have a background duty to seek peaceful dispute resolution rather than immediate violence. Property rights are not self-enforcing; they presuppose arbitration. Compossibility and the Essentialist Project (9:53–13:18) Sinard is working on an “essentialist” test: a proposed property-rights rule is only justifiable if it is logically compossible (no built-in conflicts). Kinsella links this to Hoppe's and Hülsmann's emphasis on compossible rights. Do Critics Really Oppose the Substance or Just the Word? (11:43–17:50) Kinsella suspects the dispute is merely semantic: critics accept contractual arrangements that achieve the same result as co-ownership but refuse the label. Sinard thinks critics mistakenly believe Kinsella derives property rights from contract (rather than contract from prior property rights). Tangent on contractarianism, mutual recognition, and argumentation ethics: mutual respect for rights is a proto-agreement, but contracts remain downstream of property. Consent, Revocability, and the Guest/Tenant Distinction (31:42–36:04) Bare consent (dinner guest, kissing) is revocable at will.

Sarah Fox is a lawyer transforming the way people do business. After decades dealing with huge deals in the construction sector, she realised that long, complex and bad contracts were costing time, money, deals and relationships.  Sarah advocates for short, simple contracts starting with just 500 words.  She inspires people across industries to streamline deals and enhance customer relations with contracts that represent their values, embed trust, and keep everyone protected. In this show Sarah will be sharing how speakers can create simpler contracts that can build bigger speaking businesses. What you'll discover: • The real cost of bloated contracts (and who they're really protecting) • What actually counts as a "contract" (yes, even that email thread! • How to price and protect your work, your recordings, and your energy • Why your contract should sound like you — not your solicitor's scary cousin • What red flags to watch for in pre-gig conversations • How your contract can actually accelerate your business (yes, really!) • How Sarah's TEDx moment and Happy Fee rule changed how she does business • The 3 C's every speaker contract should cover — and what to say when someone says "That's a bit pricey, isn't it?" Enjoy! If you've ever said "I'll just send them a quick email" instead of a proper agreement… this episode is for you. It's time to simplify, protect, and sound more like you in every part of your speaking business — including the small print.   If you'd like to watch the video of the episode, you can do that here>>   Guest Information: Website: https://500words.co.uk/  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarahjvfox/  Books & Resources*: Play Big by Tara Mohr Stepping Up as a Motivational Speaker with Joy Marsden - The Speaking Club 055 Speaking Resources: Grab Your From Blank Page to Stage Guide and Nail the Topic for a Client Winning Talk: https://saraharcher.co.uk/newguide-tsc  Want to get better at finding and sharing your stories then check out our FREE Five Day Snackable Story Challenge: https://www.saraharcher.co.uk/challenge  To share your thoughts:                                                   ·   leave a comment below. ·   Share this show on X, Facebook or LinkedIn. To help the show out: ·   Leave an honest review at https://www.ratethispodcast.com/tsc. Your ratings and reviews really help get the word out and I read each one. *(please note if you use my link I get a small commission, but this does not affect your payment)

The Edge of Risk Podcast by IRMI welcomes Theresa Guertin, partner at Saxe Doernberger & Vita, who was a speaker at the 2025 IRMI Construction Risk Conference in Indianapolis. Listen in for an informative discussion on coverage claims, contracts, and litigation strategy. In this 17-minute podcast episode, Ms. Guertin highlights excellent examples of policy language trends, sleeper risks, and red flags in construction insurance. She also shares her expert opinion on case law that may have a ripple effect on coverage litigation and provides highly applicable examples of best practices for construction risk transfer processes.

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding Contract Law: Performance, Breach, and ExcuseThis conversation delves into the complexities of contract law, focusing on performance, breach, and the various conditions that govern contractual obligations. It explores the tension between strict compliance and equitable considerations, the implications of anticipatory repudiation, and the legal frameworks that guide these issues under both common law and the UCC. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the nuances of contract performance and the potential consequences of breaches, while also highlighting the role of good faith in contractual relationships.In the world of contract law, the journey doesn't end with the formation of a contract. The real challenge begins with performance, where the rubber meets the road. This blog post delves into the critical aspects of contract law, focusing on performance, breach, and the excuses that can arise.The Essence of Performance: At the heart of every contract lies the duty to perform. This duty is not just a formality; it's a legal obligation that binds parties to fulfill their promises. The question often arises: how perfect does this performance need to be? Under common law, the standard is substantial performance, allowing for minor deviations as long as the essential purpose is met. However, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) demands perfection, known as the perfect tender rule, where even a slight deviation can lead to rejection.Breach and Its Classifications: When performance falters, it leads to a breach. Breaches are classified based on their severity: minor, material, or total. A minor breach allows the contract to continue, with the non-breaching party entitled to damages. A material breach, however, is significant enough to suspend the non-breaching party's obligations, potentially leading to a total breach if not cured.Excuses and Defenses: Contract law also provides mechanisms to excuse performance under certain conditions. Impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose are key defenses that can discharge duties when unforeseen events make performance unfeasible or pointless. Additionally, express conditions in contracts act as gatekeepers, determining when duties arise.Navigating the complexities of contract law requires a keen understanding of these principles. Whether you're a law student or a practicing attorney, mastering the nuances of performance, breach, and excuse is essential. Remember, the balance between strict rules and equitable outcomes is the cornerstone of high-level contract analysis.Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in contract law.TakeawaysThis Deep Dive is for law students and bar candidates.Understanding conditions is crucial for determining performance obligations.Express conditions require strict compliance, while constructive conditions allow for substantial performance.Breach classification is essential: minor, material, or total.Anticipatory repudiation allows immediate claims for breach.Adequate assurances can clarify uncertain performance situations.Impossibility and frustration of purpose can excuse performance obligations.The implied covenant of good faith underpins all contracts.Discharge by subsequent agreement can end or change contracts.The perfect tender rule is a strict standard under the UCC. contract law, performance, breach, anticipatory repudiation, conditions, good faith, UCC, common law, legal obligations, contract analysis

In this episode, host K. Wilkes and legal expert Samantha Bradshaw break down the legal essentials every content creator should understand. They tackle common misconceptions—like thinking an LLC provides trademark protection—and clarify the core pillars of intellectual property: trademarks, copyrights, and patents. Samantha explains how copyright protection is automatic, why registration matters, and how tools like batch filings, contracts, and media releases help creators protect their content and likeness online.They also explore the challenges of AI-generated content, the importance of knowing the difference between state and federal laws, and practical ways creators can proactively safeguard their work. Samantha shares insights from building her virtual law firm and highlights the value of strong support systems when navigating entrepreneurship—including why teaching your team copyright basics can reduce legal costs.If you're interested in connecting with Samantha for masterminds, membership groups, or local business circles—where she offers educational support on business and intellectual property law—please refer to the Guest Info below.Packed with actionable tips, this conversation helps creators build a strong, legally sound foundation for their brand.Chapters02:00 Demystifying Legal Practices for Content Creators14:12 Understanding Intellectual Property and Common Mistakes17:13 Defining Intellectual Property: Trademarks, Copyrights, and Patents22:17 Navigating Copyright Protection and Registration26:34 Protecting Content in the Age of AI28:15 Navigating Copyright Challenges30:57 Understanding Watch Services for Content Protection34:55 The Public Nature of Likeness and Content Ownership39:40 The Importance of Contracts in Content Creation43:10 Creating Effective Guest Release Agreements52:45 Navigating Legal Challenges in Podcasting53:20 Essential Protections for Podcasters54:55 Setting Goals for Your Podcast56:54 Balancing SEO and Trademarking58:51 Creating Trademarkable Brand Names01:00 Leveraging Intellectual Property for Growth01:02 Closing Thoughts - Building a Strong Foundation for Your BrandGuest InfoSamantha Bradshaw is a business attorney and the founder of InLine Legal. With a background as the Senior Foreign of Counsel for a multinational law firm in Beirut, Lebanon, she has a unique perspective on cross-border business and a life-by-design approach. Working from anywhere there's internet, Samantha is on a mission to empower a new generation of entrepreneurs by anti-gatekeeping legal information and showing them how to build a business that supports their life, not the other way around. She's here to talk about how a collaborative, no-nonsense approach to intellectual property can help you create lasting value and build a brand you actually own.ResourcesInLine Legal websiteInstagramYouTubeLinkedInLike what you heard? Share with others and follow us @ponderingthoughtspodcast Instagram

The Montezuma-Cortez Re-1 School Board is going to seek outside legal counsel to review the contracts for the outgoing and incoming district superintendents.

Topics discussed: Recapping a disappointing day for Red Sox fans | Rob Bradford, Lou Merloni on the Sox inactivity (The Drive) // Red Sox fans sound off on the team's continued inactivity and lack of spending // Former LSU coach Ed Orgeron's "joke" about NIL and paying players (Odds and Ends)

The Chicago Bulls enter one of the most pivotal stretches in franchise history, and tonight we're breaking down every angle. With seven players on expiring contracts, a seven-game losing streak, a collapsing defense, and Billy Donovan publicly challenging his locker room, the Bulls face tough decisions that will shape the next five years of this franchise.Haize dives deep into:

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding the Gatekeepers of Contract Law: A Deep DiveThis conversation delves into the complexities of contracts law, focusing on the Statute of Frauds, the Parole Evidence Rule, and contract interpretation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these doctrines for law students, particularly in the context of exam preparation. Key themes include the challenges of enforceability, the significance of written agreements, and the philosophical debates surrounding contract law. The conversation also provides practical strategies for approaching contracts law questions in exams, highlighting the need for a structured analytical approach.In the realm of contract law, the journey from handshake to enforceable agreement is fraught with complexities. This blog post explores the critical doctrines that govern this journey, focusing on the Statute of Frauds, the Parole Evidence Rule, and contract interpretation.The Statute of Frauds: Ensuring EnforceabilityThe Statute of Frauds serves as the first gatekeeper, determining whether a contract is enforceable. Originating from 17th-century English law, it requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged. This doctrine aims to prevent fraud and ensure that agreements are taken seriously. Key categories include contracts for the sale of land, agreements that cannot be performed within a year, and sales of goods over $500.Navigating the Parole Evidence RuleOnce a contract is deemed enforceable, the Parole Evidence Rule comes into play, focusing on the finality of the written document. This rule bars the introduction of extrinsic evidence that contradicts the written terms of a fully integrated contract. The philosophical divide between formalists, who rely solely on the written document, and contextualists, who consider external evidence, highlights the ongoing debate in contract law.Interpreting Contract TermsThe final stage involves interpreting the contract's terms. Courts aim to recover the parties' objective intent, prioritizing expressed terms, course of performance, course of dealing, and trade usage. The tension between textualism and contextualism continues to shape modern contract law, especially in an era of digital contracts and fine print.Mastering these doctrines is essential for navigating the complexities of contract law. By understanding the balance between formal predictability and subjective justice, legal professionals can anticipate counterarguments and craft sophisticated analyses. As the legal landscape evolves, the central question remains: should the law prioritize the stability of the written word or the fairness of the real bargain?Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in contract law.TakeawaysContracts law moves quickly and requires a solid understanding of key doctrines.The Statute of Frauds determines the enforceability of certain contracts.Payment alone is often insufficient to satisfy exceptions to the Statute of Frauds.The Parole Evidence Rule protects the integrity of written contracts.Integration of a writing can eliminate prior agreements from consideration.Context is crucial in understanding contract terms and intentions.The hierarchy of intent guides contract interpretation.Specific language in contracts takes precedence over general terms.Exam strategies should focus on a structured approach to contracts law.The balance between fairness and stability is a central theme in modern contract law.contracts law, statute of frauds, parole evidence rule, contract interpretation, law school, legal principles, enforceability, contract law exam, legal doctrines, law students

Pippa Hudson speaks to consumer journalist Wendy Knowler about fee increases in fixed-term contracts. Lunch with Pippa Hudson is CapeTalk’s mid-afternoon show. This 2-hour respite from hard news encourages the audience to take the time to explore, taste, read, and reflect. The show - presented by former journalist, baker and water sports enthusiast Pippa Hudson - is unashamedly lifestyle driven. Popular features include a daily profile interview #OnTheCouch at 1:10 pm. Consumer issues are in the spotlight every Wednesday while the team also unpacks all things related to health, wealth & the environment. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Lunch with Pippa Hudson Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays between 13:00 and 15:00 (SA Time) to Lunch with Pippa Hudson broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/MdSlWEs or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/fDJWe69 Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Smylie Kaufman and Charlie Hulme are back for a packed episode featuring a guest appearance from 2025 Australian Open champion Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen - fresh off his win at Royal Melbourne! Charlie opens and closes the show with some heartfelt reflections following his father's passing. The guys then jump into all the action from the Bahamas - Hideki Matsuyama's outrageous short game and putter collection, grading Scottie Scheffler's first year with a new putting grip, Wyndham Clark's viral “turf conditions” quote, and a behind-the-scenes look at Smylie's pro-am round in Albany. Then Rasmus joins the show — jet-lagged, honest, and riding high. He walks Smylie through: • The intense crowds in Australia • Playing head-to-head with Cameron Smith • How firm Royal Melbourne truly played • The near-impossible chip on 18 • The pressure of closing out a win overseas • How he processed the moment on a 20+ hour flight home Thanks for watching — subscribe for more episodes, interviews, and weekly golf breakdowns! CHAPTERS: 0:00 – Welcome Back 4:00 – Smylie's Airline Disaster 10:00 – Hero World Challenge Reactions 15:00 – Hideki's Iron Game & Short-Game Brilliance 20:00 – Why Hideki Tinkers With 400 Putters 26:00 – Alex Noren's Rise & Unique Swing Rehearsal 32:00 – Shot Shape Trends & Modern Fade-Dominance 38:00 – Smylie's Pro-Am Stories + Albany Short-Game Test 44:00 – Wyndham Clark's Turf Comments & Course Debate 50:00 – Q-School Controversy: Weather, Contracts, and Fairness 56:00 – Rasmus Interview Begins 1:00:00 – Royal Melbourne Conditions & Massive Crowds 1:06:00 – The 18th Hole: Rasmus Breaks Down the Chip 1:12:00 – Fastest Greens? Comparing Sandbelt to Augusta 1:16:30 – Remembering Charlie's Dad #golf #smylieshow #pgatour #golfhighlights 

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 478. Related: The Universal Principles of Liberty Announcing the Universal Principles of Liberty Fusillo on the Universal Principles of Liberty and Liberland KOL473 | The Universal Principles of Liberty, with Mark Maresca of The White Pillbox Selling Does Not Imply Ownership, and Vice-Versa: A Dissection, in Legal Foundations of a Free Society A Libertarian Theory of Contract: Title Transfer, Binding Promises, and Inalienability and Inalienability and Punishment: A Reply to George Smith, in Legal Foundations of a Free Society Disentangling Legal and Economic Concepts Dualism, Monism, Scientism, Causality, Teleology: Hoppe, Mises, Rothbard Libertarian Answer Man: Mind-Body Dualism, Self-Ownership, and Property Rights God as Slaveowner; Conversations with Murphy Mises on God KOL293 | Faith and Free Will, with Steve Mendelsohn  This is my appearance on Adam Haman's podcast and Youtube channel, Haman Nature (Haman Nature substack), Kinsella's Legal Treatise On Universal Principles Of Liberty | Hn 185 (recorded Nov. 9,  2025; released Dec. 9, 2025). https://youtu.be/tc-hdB_yiS4?si=icPwq5mSS6nDU8LP Adam's show notes: On this episode of Haman Nature, libertarian poker pro Adam Haman is joined once again by libertarian legal theorist (and patent attorney who despises IP) Stephan Kinsella about his new creation: The Universal Principles of Liberty. (apologies, folks - my mic was a bit wonky on this one) 00:00 -- Intro. Welcoming author, attorney, world-traveler, and all-around great guy Stephan Kinsella! 02:54 -- What are "The Universal Principles of Liberty", and why should we be excited by it? 11:40 -- What is a "person"? What is "property"? Why are these things so important to think about clearly? 34:24 -- This simple and elegant document can handle deep and complex issues. 47:54 -- When (and why) does selling not imply ownership, and vice-versa? What does "dualism" have to do with this? What's the confusion between economics and law when dealing with this stuff? 56:53 -- Outro. Go comment on TUPoL! (linked below) Thanks for watching Haman Nature!  Shownotes, links, grok summary, and transcript below. Shownotes (Grok) Haman Nature Podcast – Show Notes Guest: Stephan Kinsella Host: Adam Haman Episode Topic: The Universal Principles of Liberty – A New Foundation for Free Societies   0:00 – Opening Banter & Liberland Passport Shenanigans Stephan shows up in casual clothes after taking a suit-and-tie selfie… for his upcoming Liberland passport photo   Only a libertarian would put on half a suit to pretend to be a government just to get a passport   Stephan is heading to Prague in December 2025 for the signing and announcement of the Liberland Constitution 1:04 – Who is Stephan Kinsella? Patent attorney turned leading anarchist legal theorist   Author of Against Intellectual Property and Legal Foundations of a Free Society   Recent Vegas trip with Adam: helicopter into the Grand Canyon, Venetian St. Mark's Square (tacky but awesome) 2:59 – Introducing “The Universal Principles of Liberty” (TUPoL) A one-page, elegant, civil-law-style statement of libertarian metanorms   Not a constitution, not a detailed legal code – a foundational layer that private legal systems can build upon   Voluntary opt-in document: you must explicitly sign on to be bound   Purpose: foster conflict-free interaction through reason, experience, and ethics – no state decree, no majority vote 5:09 – Origin Story: From Liberland → Bir Tawil → Universal Principles Stephan helped draft Liberland's early (still statist) constitution but was uneasy as an anarchist   Long history of libertarian startup-country projects (Seasteading, Atlantis, Prospera, etc.)   Max (FreeMax) approached Stephan about Bir Tawil (unclaimed land between Egypt & Sudan) and wanted principles instead of a state   Co-drafters: Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Alessandro Fusillo, David Dürr, Pat Tinsley 9:16 – Why This Document Now? Refinement of 30+ years of libertarian legal theory (Rothbard, Hoppe, Kinsella)   Earlier concise restatement now in the Libertarian Party platform (plank 2.1/2.2)   Goal: a short, uncontroversial, legally precise statement that any free society can point to 11:40 – Key Features & Definitions “Person” = any sentient being capable of moral agency (includes possible AGI/aliens, excludes animals)   Rights are exclusively property rights in scarce physical resources (no “right to life,” no IP)   Self-ownership is primary and inalienable (the Walter Block voluntary-slavery debate settled against alienability)   Body rights can only be forfeited by committing aggression (proportional punishment/restoration justified) 20:01 – Freedom is a Consequence, Not a Primary Right No need for enumerated positive rights (speech, religion, warm baths)   All legitimate freedoms flow from property rights in body and external resources 23:25 – Why Self-Ownership is Inalienable (and Walter Block is wrong) Body ownership arises from direct embodiment/control, not homesteading   You can abandon or sell homesteaded external resources; you cannot abandon “you”   Contracts are title transfers, not enforceable promises 29:12 – Punishment, Outlaws, and Estoppel Aggressors implicitly consent to proportional defensive/enforcement force   No need for prior signed contract with an outlaw – committing aggression waives the right to complain 34:26 – Weapons of Mass Destruction Clause (Article 8) Indiscriminate devices that cannot be aimed solely at aggressors are legitimately restrictable   Practical insurance/neighborhood covenants would handle most cases anyway 37:39 – Evidentiary Standards Borrowed from Tradition Severe remedies require heightened standards (e.g., beyond reasonable doubt, jury nullification rights)   Roman & common law are largely libertarian and will serve as starting points 40:41 – Select Unjust Laws & Aspirational Closing Explicitly lists taxation, IP, conscription, etc. as unjust   Beautiful final paragraph: “We bow to no state… no power on earth will stop us” (mostly written by Max) 42:47 – Why Law Must Develop Organically (Quote from Stephan's blog) Detailed armchair legal codes are premature and counterproductive   Law evolves case-by-case through real disputes, custom, and decentralized courts 47:58 – Deep Dive: “Selling Does Not Imply Ownership” & Misesian Dualism Crucial distinction between possession/control (causal/economic) and legal ownership (normative)   Robinson Crusoe has possession but no ownership   Labor/services are not ownable – employment contracts are conditional title transfers of money, not sales of “labor”   Confusing the two realms leads to the fallacious justification for intellectual property 1:06:20 – Free Will, Compatibilism, and Scientism In the causal realm there is no free will (no downward causation)   In the teleological realm of human action we unavoidably treat people as purposeful choosers   Stephan's “Misesian compatibilism” – both views are correct in their respective domains 1:16:53 – Closing & Future Plans Stephan will push to have TUPoL incorporated into the final Liberland Constitution (to the extent compatible)   Next big project: new comprehensive book on IP/copyright titled Copy This Book   Where to find everything: stephankinsella.com | Universal Principles of Liberty poster & text freely available Links   The Universal Principles of Liberty full text & poster: https://www.stephankinsella.com/principles/   Stephan's blog announcement: https://stephankinsella.com/2025/08/announcing-the-universal-principles-of-liberty/   Adam's original Substack post: https://hamannature.substack.com/p/kinsellas-legal-treatise-on-universal Enjoy the episode and go read (and sign!) the Universal Principles of Liberty! Transcript (Youtube/Grok): Haman Nature Interview: Stephan Kinsella on The Universal Principles of Liberty (Corrected transcript – spelling, punctuation, minor grammar, no paraphrasing. Long speaking blocks broken into ≤10-sentence paragraphs. Topical headers with timestamps added.) Opening Banter & Liberland Passport Story [0:00] Adam Haman: Intro. Welcoming author, attorney, world-traveler, and all-around great guy Stephan Kinsella! [0:00] Stephan Kinsella: You forgot your cue. I told you to ask me about my adventure this morning and putting on a suit and tie. [0:06] Adam: I thought that was off because you, sir, are not wearing a suit and tie anymore. [0:11] Stephan: I know. So it wasn't for you. You know how people—well, I don't want to mess my shirt up. I can reuse it now. You know how it's probably common knowledge now that ever since the Zoom era, a lot of people were telecommuting and so they would put on a shirt and tie but they were wearing shorts underneath, right? [0:37] Stephan: So I did something this morning and I was thinking only a libertarian would do this. I put on a suit and tie to take a photo of myself because I need a passport photo. But I don't need a regular passport photo. I need a photo that I can use for my Liberland passport because I'm going to Prague in December for the signing and announcement of the Liberland Constitution. Formal Introduction [1:04] Adam: Hello and welcome to Haman Nature. I am Adam Haman and that fine fellow fiddling with his pipe on a Houston morning is one Stephan Kinsella. How you doing, sir? [1:15] Stephan: I'm in fine fettle. You're fine fettle and a fine fellow. [1:22] Adam: For those of you who just woke up underneath a rock, Stephan Kinsella is a legal theorist, one of our best, and also the author of this highly influential book here,

Danny Green and Harrison Sanford start to preview the NBA Cup action happening in the association on Tuesday night. Then, they have a discussion about the surging Phoenix Suns and how legit they can be this year. Finally, they end with their top 5 "hidden gem" contracts in the league. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Every year, there are 5 or 6 max-level contracts deemed untradeable. In this episode, we do our best to come up with six trades for players unlikely to be traded anytime soon and dissect them in another round of Who Says No?0:00 Intro2:07 Zach LaVine12:30 Kawhi Leonard21:36 Zion Williamson (as part of a Giannis trade)36:17 Paul George45:39 Joel Embiid55:13 Dejounte MurrayYou can follow Yossi on:Twitter: https://twitter.com/YossiGozlanBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/yossigozlan.bsky.socialSalary cap sheets: www.capsheets.comYou can follow Sam on:Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamQuinnCBSThird Apron is available on all podcast providers. Please subscribe, rate, and share if you enjoyed this: https://linktr.ee/yossigozlanYou can also access Yossi's salary cap analysis on his Substack. Subscribe for $7 per month or $50 annually!Third Apron: https://thirdapron.com

Understanding Contract Defenses: The Safety Valves of LawThis conversation delves into the critical aspects of contract defenses, focusing on how contracts can fail despite appearing valid. It covers the distinctions between void and voidable contracts, the capacity of parties, vitiation of assent, misrepresentation, mistakes, and the implications of illegality and unconscionability. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these defenses for law students preparing for exams, providing a structured analytical approach to tackle contract law questions effectively.In the intricate world of contract law, understanding the defenses available can be as crucial as knowing how to form a contract. These defenses act as safety valves, ensuring that agreements are not enforced when they are fundamentally flawed. Let's delve into the key defenses that can unmake a contract.Void vs. Voidable ContractsA critical distinction in contract law is between void and voidable contracts. A void contract is a nullity from the start, often due to illegality or lack of capacity. In contrast, a voidable contract is initially valid but can be invalidated by the victim due to factors like duress or fraud.Capacity and ConsentThe law protects those who may not fully understand the implications of a contract, such as minors or those with mental incapacities. These individuals have the power to disaffirm contracts, highlighting the law's protective stance. Consent, too, must be genuine. Misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can render a contract voidable.Unconscionability and Public PolicyContracts that are grossly unfair or violate public policy are often unenforceable. Unconscionability addresses both procedural and substantive issues, ensuring that contracts are not enforced if they are shockingly one-sided.Understanding these defenses is crucial for anyone navigating contract law. They ensure that contracts are not just legally binding but also fair and just. As you prepare for your exams or real-world applications, remember these safety valves and their role in maintaining the integrity of contractual agreements.TakeawaysUnderstanding defenses is non-negotiable for law students.The difference between void and voidable contracts is crucial.Capacity of parties is a key factor in contract validity.Duress and undue influence can vitiate consent.Misrepresentation can be innocent, negligent, or fraudulent.Mutual mistake can lead to contract rescission.Unconscionability allows courts to refuse enforcement of unfair contracts.The statute of frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing.Restitution is a common remedy when contracts are unwound.A systematic approach is essential for analyzing contract defenses.contract law, void contracts, voidable contracts, capacity, consent, duress, misrepresentation, fraud, unconscionability, statute of frauds

To watch a video version of this podcast, click here: https://youtu.be/nu1GoDS3z-EIn this episode of the Structure Talk podcast, hosts Reuben Saltzman and Tessa Murry welcome Nate Mielke, a general contractor and remodeler. They discuss Nate's journey in the construction industry, the differences between design-build and general contracting, and the importance of building performance in remodeling projects. The conversation also touches on unique business practices that set Nate apart from other contractors, as well as valuable lessons learned from past experiences.Here's the link to Inspector Empire Builder: https://www.iebcoaching.com/events You can check Nate's website here: www.skapar.netTakeawaysNate Mielke has been in the construction industry since 1997.The design-build approach allows for better collaboration and project outcomes.Pre-construction planning is crucial for successful remodeling projects.Building performance considerations can impact client satisfaction and comfort.Nate emphasizes the importance of understanding client budgets from the start.Mistakes in contracts can lead to significant issues, including lawsuits.Value engineering helps clients achieve their desired outcomes within budget.Nate's company focuses on high-end remodeling projects, typically ranging from $200,000 to $600,000.The use of technology and AI tools is becoming increasingly important in the construction industry.Nate's experience highlights the need for good contracts and legal protections in contracting. Chapters00:00 Introduction and Personal Updates07:17 Nate Mielke's Journey in Contracting18:20 Understanding Design-Build vs. General Contracting22:57 Project Scope and Examples25:48 Cost Insights for Bathroom and Kitchen Remodels26:48 Optimizing Space: Plumbing and Layout Considerations27:49 Integrating Building Performance in Remodeling30:16 Addressing Ventilation and Comfort in Remodels32:41 Client Concerns: Health and Indoor Environment34:16 Identifying Mold Issues in Older Homes37:35 The Impact of Building Codes on Home Performance38:21 Pre-Construction Planning: Setting Projects Up for Success41:28 Leveraging Technology: AI in Construction Management44:23 Learning from Mistakes: The Importance of Contracts

BT & Sal kick off the show by celebrating the one-year anniversary of the Juan Soto signing, arguing that winning the offseason doesn't guarantee a successful season. The focus quickly shifts to the Winter Meetings and a report on David Stearns' reluctance to give out long-term deals to free agent starting pitchers. Sal defends Stearns' strategy, preferring to chase Tarik Skubal via trade or pursue Michael King over overpaying non-aces like Framber Valdez. The hosts debate whether the Mets can afford to lose Pete Alonso and Edwin Díaz if Stearns' plan to build a "better" team doesn't include massive free-agent contracts. The conversation takes a sharp turn as they discuss the Diddy documentary on Netflix, with Sal questioning whether the hip-hop mogul was responsible for Tupac's death, and noting the lack of payment to artists. The show wraps up with calls debating the Mets' potential pursuit of Kyle Schwarber and Jeff McNeil's "petulant" behavior, with the hosts wondering if a new-look team could function without their "Core Four."

Yes, there are black bears in Door County, but we don't yet know where the one that washed ashore in Egg Harbor came from. Myles Dannhausen Jr. talks to Debra Fitzgerald about that bear, but first they dig into the news that the U.S. Navy has cancelled contracts for four Constellation-class frigates being built by Fincantieri Marinette Marine with assistance from its Sturgeon Bay yard. What does it mean for local workers when a multi-billion dollar contract ends?

The United States is close to declaring war on Venezuela. Well, sort of; the President said he won't actually seek a declaration from Congress and instead just “kill people that are bringing drugs into our country.” Just prior, however, the White House gave Maduro an ultimatum to flee Venezuela. So are we killing people with drugs on boats or orchestrating regime change? The 2024 US DOJ-DEA National Drug Threat Assessment literally did not even mention Venezuela. The only recent major indictment of the country came from a Presidential Memorandum on September 15, 2024, which declared several countries as having failed in “their obligations under international counternarcotics agreements.” Ironically, the President made “null” and “void” all “documents, proclamations, Executive Orders, Memorandums, or Contracts,” signed under former President Biden's autopen, essentially erasing the declaration that Venezuela had any connection serious to drug trafficking. But for drugs like fentanyl, nearly 100% of it comes through Mexico. One would be confused in learning this and then trying to figure out why the White House has targeted Venezuela in the name of those same drugs. Remember, Mexico refused to assist in cleaning up the cartels under Claudia Sheinbaum, and it is her ethno-state, Israel, which is verifiably behind training the cartels, arming them, and facilitating through HIAS mass human trafficking. The White House is also saying that Venezuela is a host of illegal immigration, though Mexico and several other countries play a far greater role.  This has people thinking that the whole issue is about oil, something the US State Department has denied. But perhaps it is about Sheinbaum. While Javier Milei of Argentina, who is also Jewish, just launched the Isaac Accords to strengthen political, economic and cultural cooperation between Israel and Latin America, Maduro of Venezuela, who himself has Jewish heritage, has consistently been condemning Israel as holding “an ideology more dangerous than Nazism.” He has accused Jews of controlling his opposition and the media, the same media now telling the public we have to stop Venezuelan drug trafficking by regime change only. Or perhaps, Maduro, who is Jewish, is playing the role of turning over the resource rich country to the US-Israel alliance, hence why he was given the option to flee. *The is the FREE archive, which includes advertisements. If you want an ad-free experience, you can subscribe below.WEBSITEFREE ARCHIVE (w. ads)SUBSCRIPTION ARCHIVE-X / TWITTERFACEBOOKINSTAGRAMYOUTUBERUMBLE-BUY ME A COFFEECashApp: $rdgable PAYPAL: rdgable1991@gmail.comRyan's Books: https://thesecretteachings.info - EMAIL: rdgable@yahoo.com / rdgable1991@gmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-secret-teachings--5328407/support.

In this episode, I'm joined by Oto Gomes, crypto investor, mentor, and founder of the Crypto Freedom Academy, for a conversation that goes far beyond charts, markets, and digital assets. Oto brings over a decade of crypto experience and another decade as an accountant, but what truly sets him apart is his heart-centered approach to wealth, sovereignty, and freedom.Together, we unpack why so many people feel disempowered around money, how our beliefs shape our financial reality, and why the future of prosperity depends less on chasing quick wins and more on understanding who we are at our core. Oto shares practical and grounded wisdom on navigating crypto safely, building true abundance, and creating a resilient inner foundation that can weather both bull and bear markets—externally and internally.We also explore the deeper emotional and spiritual layers of money. Oto breaks down how self-worth ties directly into financial behavior, why sovereignty is a non-negotiable in the new paradigm, and how interdependent communities can help us rewrite our relationship with wealth. His mission is clear: to empower people to reclaim their agency, operate from integrity, and create a prosperous life rooted in accountability and connection.If you're curious about crypto, seeking a more holistic approach to money, or wanting to align your financial path with personal freedom and purpose, this conversation offers grounded insights and expansive perspective. Visit lukestorey.com/cryptoacademy and use code LUKE for 10% off courses in the Crypto Freedom Academy.DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for educational purposes only and not intended for diagnosing or treating illnesses. The hosts disclaim responsibility for any adverse effects from using the information presented. Consult your healthcare provider before using referenced products. This podcast may include paid endorsements.THIS SHOW IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:BIOPTIMIZERS | Get 25% off Bioptimizer's entire product line for Black Friday and Cyber Monday at bioptimizers.com/lukePIQUE | For a limited time, get 20% off for life plus a free starter kit at piquelife.com/lukeLITTLE SAINTS | Visit littlesaints.com/luke and use code LUKE to get 20% off your first order. EONS | Visit lukestorey.com/eons and use code LUKE20 to save 20%.MORE ABOUT THIS EPISODE:(00:00:00) The $1.1 Million Lesson & the Truth About Wealth(00:10:57) Wartime vs Peacetime Capitalism & the Flow of Money(00:27:00) Crypto 101: Bitcoin, Blockchains, & Why It Won't Just “Disappear”(00:49:48) Blockchain, Internet “Nations,” & Rewriting Your Relationship With Money(01:09:13) From “I'm Bad at Tech” to Confident Crypto Steward(01:23:09) Redefining Money, Debt, & Value in a Two-World Reality(01:46:47) No One Is Coming to Save Us: Dismantling Statism, Contracts, & False KingsResources:• Website: otogomes.live• Instagram:

⬜ Welcome to Palvatar Market Recap, your go-to daily briefing on the latest market movements, global macro shifts, and crypto trends—powered by Raoul Pal's AI avatar, Palvatar ⬜ In today's update, Palvatar reviews a shaky start to December across global markets. Bitcoin faces its steepest one-day drop in months following China's crypto ban, while Japan considers a flat 20% tax on crypto gains and Sony Bank plans a U.S. stablecoin launch. Economic indicators show China's manufacturing contraction, cautious U.S. sentiment ahead of key reports, and mixed signals from UK consumer borrowing, highlighting ongoing market uncertainty.

“Giants Talk” hosts Cole Kuiper and Alex Pavlovic offer updates on Tatsuya Imai and on San Francisco's latest free-agent signings. Plus, a look at major deals around MLB so far.--(2:57) - Giants sign reliever Sam Hentges to one year deal(8:31) - The latest on Tatsuya Imai(18:47) - Looking back on large Giants contracts(22:00) - A look at major deals around the MLB(30:53) - Fan mailbag questions Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.